Tri-state water dispute

Last updated

Chattahoochee River in Norcross, Georgia, downstream from Lake Lanier and Buford Dam. Chattahoochee.jpg
Chattahoochee River in Norcross, Georgia, downstream from Lake Lanier and Buford Dam.

The tri-state water dispute is a 21st-century water-use conflict among the U.S. states of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida over flows in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin and the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River Basin. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has regulated water flow for the entire Chattahoochee River, from Lake Lanier in Forsyth County, Georgia, to Alabama and Florida.

Contents

The states filed suit in 1990 in their conflict over the water supply; federal courts has affirmed the Corps' authority to negotiate the conflict. As the Lake Lanier project was authorized by Congress, each of the three states is entitled to an equal portion of the water; the project was never envisioned only to benefit metropolitan Atlanta, the closest large city and one that has developed rapidly since the late 20th century, greatly increasing its water consumption. The water flows are also regulated to support a variety of uses by states downriver, including preservation of marine life under the Endangered Species Act, and support for major seafood industries.

History

Buford Dam

Buford Dam on the Chattahoochee River in northern Georgia. The dam impounds Lake Lanier. USACE Buford Dam Georgia.jpg
Buford Dam on the Chattahoochee River in northern Georgia. The dam impounds Lake Lanier.

In 1938, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers produced a report for the U.S. Congress that suggested a list of potential hydropower projects. One of the suggested dams was the Buford Dam on the Chattahoochee River to create a reservoir (now known as Lake Lanier) in north Georgia. In addition to providing hydroelectric power, the dam could provide a steady water supply to Atlanta if, in the future, the city needed additional water resources. The city did not contribute to construction of the dam or reservoir. [1] Additional objectives for the dam included reducing flooding downriver during heavy rains and allowing for easier navigation on related Georgia waterways. [2]

Congress authorized the construction of Buford Dam in 1946, and the dam was completed in 1957. As Atlanta's population continued to grow from the time the dam was built, especially since the late 20th century, its consumption and need for water has grown. At the same time, both Alabama and Florida used the waters from Lake Lanier, which were critical to a variety of uses, including important economic industries. In 1989, the Corps of Engineers released a report concluding that some of the water being used for hydroelectric power at Buford Dam should, instead, be used to supply Atlanta with water for human consumption. [3]

As a result of the COE's recommendation, Alabama filed a lawsuit in 1990 against Georgia and the Army Corps of Engineers, followed by the state of Florida later that year. Alabama challenged the Corps' recommendation of the reallocation of the water supply, arguing that the Corps' recommendation had favored Georgia's interests and had ignored the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the impact of its recommendation on the environment. In its suit, Florida cited the critical effect of the dam's operations on endangered species and NEPA violations by the Corps of Engineers. [4] Alabama and Florida later filed amended briefs to the 1990 Alabama suit, stating that an endangered aquatic species was being threatened due to a decrease of water levels downriver. [3]

After the 1990 lawsuit was filed in Alabama, the parties decided to suspend legal procedures in an effort to reach an agreement suitable to all three states. After arbitration by a federal judge from Minnesota, in 1997, the parties created two compacts: the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) between Alabama, Florida, and Georgia; and the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) between Alabama and Georgia. [5] Georgia had sued the Corps for wrongfully prohibiting Lake Lanier to be used for water consumption for metropolitan Atlanta, but a federal judge ruled that the project had not been authorized for that purpose. [3]

During negotiation of the 1997 compacts, Georgia also entered into negotiations with the Corps to allow part of Lake Lanier to be used for water consumption. In 2004, both Alabama and Florida challenged these agreements due to the preeminence of the suit filed by Alabama in 1990. [6] The 1997 compacts, however, were not successful; they were allowed to expire in 2003 and 2004, for the ACF and the ACT, respectively.

The states could not agree on minimum flow requirements, general operation standards, and consumption caps. Georgia argued that if the flow standards are met, then minimum flow requirements are unnecessary. [7] Georgia and the Corps of Engineers reached an agreement to reduce the state's water usage from Lake Lanier, but in 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that this type of change in the agreement required Congressional approval and could not be made by the USACE. [5] At various times, the governors of each of the three states have met, but these meetings have resulted only in deadline extensions for agreement. When U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar visited Georgia in 2009, he said that he would not force the states into any agreement, but he would help them come to an agreement. [8]

U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson, brought in as a neutral arbiter, ruled in July 2009 that metropolitan Atlanta would be prohibited from taking water out of Lake Lanier for a three-year negotiation period to begin among the states of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. [9] In October 2009, Judge Magnuson ruled against Georgia in response to an appeal by the state on the July ruling. [10]

In June 2011 the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the 2009 district court decision and confirmed the USACE's authority to regulate Lake Lanier for Atlanta's water supply. [11] The Corps responded in June 2012 with plans for further analysis and evaluation of proposals from the three states. [12]

In 2013, Florida filed an original action against Georgia in the Supreme Court of the United States, requesting equitable apportionment of waters in the ACF Basin. On November 3, 2014, the Supreme Court granted Florida leave to file the complaint, and the case went before a special master before being argued on January 8, 2018. [13] [ needs update ]

Positions

Georgia

Georgia has indicated that the need for fresh water to use for human consumption is its primary concern in the issue. Experts in the metro Atlanta area assert that the people of metro Atlanta require and can safely extract 705 million gallons (2.67  Gl) of fresh water per day from a number of reservoirs and water basins around northern Georgia until the year 2030. Georgia states the water from Lake Allatoona and the Etowah River in North Georgia could sustain the water needs of the metro Atlanta area. [14] Georgia's main concern is whether or not they have the capability to supply over 5.6 million people [15] in the metro Atlanta area with potable water.

Because of Georgia's need to supply a booming population with safe, usable water, Georgia's circumstance is unique to the three states involved. [14] The interstate water dispute becomes an intrastate issue for Georgia because of the major quantities of water needed for supporting population growth in the metro Atlanta. The growth of Atlanta has also increased water consumption for maintaining lawns and golf courses, which other parties to the rivers do not want to support. Lake Lanier's downstream users in Georgia maintain that an increase in the water consumption of metro Atlanta results in a decrease of available water for users in south Georgia. [14] Farmers in Southwest Georgia and homeowners on West Point Lake perceive metro Atlanta as competition for water. [14]

For the past two decades, Georgia's leadership has failed to produce significant agreements with Alabama and Florida. Many people blame the leaders of the state for this failure. The old course of "Conflict, Conceal, and Capture" [16] has not resulted in any progress. In December 2009 Governor Sonny Perdue's Water Contingency Planning Task Force recommended greater water conservation in the Atlanta region and further negotiation regarding the reallocation of portions of Lake Lanier to supply the needs of metro Atlanta. [16] Nathan Deal, Governor of Georgia in 2011, wanted to resolve the conflict with Alabama by finding new solutions to Atlanta's need for water. [17]

Alabama

Alabama uses water of the ACF River Basin for a variety of purposes, including agriculture, industry, fisheries, recreation, preservation of habitats and biodiversity, power generation, navigation, and water quality, [18] all of which may be limited by Atlanta's growing usage. Alabama's goals during the ACF negotiations have been to ensure adequate water levels of the Chattahoochee River through the Alabama cities of Phenix City and Columbia, perpetuation of waste assimilation and water use permits in the middle regions of the Chattahoochee River, continuation of the Corps' projects such as hydropower and flood control, preservation of water levels of Alabama's West Point Lake and Lake Eufaula, and ensuring that neither current or future plans adversely affect the stated goals. [19] During the drought of 2007, the state of Georgia had statewide water restrictions, but the city of Phenix City, Alabama failed to enact water restrictions on their customers. [20]

During the early part of the process, Alabama was, compared to Georgia and Florida, somewhat ill-equipped to address some of the arguments presented by Florida and Georgia. The state did not pass a comprehensive Water Resources Act until 1993, more than two years after their lawsuit was filed against the Corps. The newly created Office of Water Resources was not fully staffed until 1997. But it has worked to catch up. [21]

Florida

As another downstream user of the ACF River Basin, Florida wants and needs enough freshwater to reach the Apalachicola Bay of Northwestern Florida to maintain shrimping and other seafood industries, which provide significant income for the state. These industries are vital to the Apalachicola Bay area and generate millions of dollars for the region, while providing thousands of jobs. [22] Unlike Georgia, where the issue over the use of freshwater is based on supplying a growing human population with potable water, Florida is faced with economic challenges and severe losses if the water from upriver is diminished. [23]

Policy issues

Stakeholders

As all three states have portions of the ACF river basin, ACT river basin, or both within their borders, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida are involved in the issue. [24] The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers constructed Lake Lanier under authorization and appropriations by Congress, and controls its flow of water for multiple purposes, so it is involved in the dispute. [25]

Concerned with the environmental effects on the two river basins, the Tri-State Conservation Coalition—a league of more than 45 organizations, including the Alabama Rivers Alliance, Southern Environmental Law Center, American Rivers, Lake Watch of Lake Martin, and Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper—is involved with the goal of preserving the water quality and other environmental factors. [26]

Environmental impact

Alabama is concerned about environmental effects under drought, if the waters of the ACF and the ACT river basins are diminished to use Lake Lanier to supply water for Atlanta's consumption. [27] These two river basins are the habitat for countless numbers of fish and other aquatic life, which need a proper amount of water to thrive. [22]

If the water levels fall too low, such aquatic species may suffer. Endangered species of both sturgeon and mussel live in the basins, and reducing the water supply to the basins would put these endangered species at risk. [24] NEPA requires submission of an environmental impact statement (EIS) before any action with potentially major environmental effects can take place. No EIS has been published for changes to allocation of water from Lake Lanier, indicating the full environmental impact has not been assessed. [28] Draft Programmatic EISs for the two basins were published in 1999, but were never formalized. No Record of Decision (ROD) was ever published.[ citation needed ]

Florida also has major environmental issues related to the flow in the ACF basin. The Apalachicola Bay provides 35 percent of the freshwater flow to the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and it is vital to the richly productive estuaries in this region. The key to the estuary is the fluctuation in salinity levels produced by the ACF's freshwater flow. A reduced flow of fresh water into these estuaries would result in higher salinity levels, that could endanger the marine life, including that supporting major seafood industries. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seminole County, Georgia</span> County in Georgia, United States

Seminole County is a county located in the southwestern corner of U.S. state of Georgia. As of the 2020 census, the population was 9,147. The county seat is Donalsonville.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forsyth County, Georgia</span> County in Georgia, United States

Forsyth County is a county in the Northeast portion of the U.S. state of Georgia. Suburban and exurban in character, Forsyth County lies within the Atlanta Metropolitan Area. The county's only incorporated city and county seat is Cumming. At the 2020 census, the population was 251,283. Forsyth was the fastest-growing county in Georgia and the 15th fastest-growing county in the United States between 2010 and 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chattahoochee River</span> River in Georgia, United States

The Chattahoochee River forms the southern half of the Alabama and Georgia border, as well as a portion of the Florida and Georgia border. It is a tributary of the Apalachicola River, a relatively short river formed by the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers and emptying from Florida into Apalachicola Bay in the Gulf of Mexico. The Chattahoochee River is about 430 miles (690 km) long. The Chattahoochee, Flint, and Apalachicola rivers together make up the Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin. The Chattahoochee makes up the largest part of the ACF's drainage basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ACF River Basin</span> Drainage basin of the Apalachicola River in the southeastern United States

The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin is the drainage basin, or watershed, of the Apalachicola River, Chattahoochee River, and Flint River, in the Southeastern United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apalachicola River</span> 180 km (112mi) river in Florida, USA

The Apalachicola River is a river, approximately 160 miles (260 km) long, in the state of Florida. The river's large watershed, known as the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint (ACF) River Basin, drains an area of approximately 19,500 square miles (50,500 km2) into the Gulf of Mexico. The distance to its farthest head waters in northeast Georgia is approximately 500 miles (800 km). Its name comes from Apalachicola Province, an association of Native American towns located on what is now the Chattahoochee River. The Spanish included what is now called the Chattahoochee River as part of one river, calling all of it from its origins in the southern Appalachian foothills down to the Gulf of Mexico the Apalachicola.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flint River</span> River in Georgia, United States

The Flint River is a 344-mile-long (554 km) river in the U.S. state of Georgia. The river drains 8,460 square miles (21,900 km2) of western Georgia, flowing south from the upper Piedmont region south of Atlanta to the wetlands of the Gulf Coastal Plain in the southwestern corner of the state. Along with the Apalachicola and the Chattahoochee rivers, it forms part of the ACF basin. In its upper course through the red hills of the Piedmont, it is considered especially scenic, flowing unimpeded for over 200 miles (320 km). Historically, it was also called the Thronateeska River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake Lanier</span> Reservoir in Georgia, United States

Lake Lanier is a reservoir in the northern portion of the U.S. state of Georgia. It was created by the completion of Buford Dam on the Chattahoochee River in 1956, and is also fed by the waters of the Chestatee River. The lake encompasses 38,000 acres (150 km2) or 59 sq mi (150 km2) of water, and 692 mi (1,114 km) of shoreline at normal level, a "full pool" of 1,071 ft (326 m) above mean sea level and the exact shoreline varies by resolution according to the coastline paradox. Named for poet Sidney Lanier, it was built and is operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for flood control and water supplies. Its construction destroyed more than 50,000 acres (20,000 ha) of farmland and displaced more than 250 families, 15 businesses, and relocated 20 cemeteries along with their remains in the process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apalachicola Bay</span>

Apalachicola Bay is an estuary and lagoon located on the northwest coast of the U.S. state of Florida. The Apalachicola Bay system also includes St. George Sound, St. Vincent Sound and East Bay, covering an area of about 208 square miles (540 km2). Four islands, St. Vincent Island to the west, Cape St. George Island and St. George Island to the south, and Dog Island to the east, separate the system from the Gulf of Mexico. Water exchange occurs through Indian Pass, West Pass, East Pass and the Duer Channel. The lagoon has been designated as a National Estuarine Research Reserve and the Apalachicola River is the largest source of freshwater to the estuary. Combined with the Chattahoochee River, Flint River, and Ochlockonee River they drain a watershed of over 20,000 square miles (50,000 km2) at a rate of 19,599 cubic feet per second according to the United States Geological Survey in 2002.

Chattahoochee Riverkeeper (CRK) -- formerly known as Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper (UCR) -- is an environmental advocacy organization with 10,000 members dedicated solely to protecting and restoring the Chattahoochee River Basin. CRK was modeled after New York’s Hudson Riverkeeper and was the 11th licensed program in the international Waterkeeper Alliance. In 2012, the organization officially changed its name to simply Chattahoochee Riverkeeper (CRK), dropping the "Upper" to better reflect its stewardship over the entire river basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake Seminole</span>

Lake Seminole is a reservoir located in the southwest corner of Georgia along its border with Florida, maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Chattahoochee and Flint rivers join in the lake, before flowing from the Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, which impounds the lake, as the Apalachicola River. The lake contains 37,500 acres (152 km2) of water, and has a shoreline of 376 mi (605 km). The fish in Lake Seminole include largemouth bass, crappie, chain pickerel, catfish, striped bass and other species. American alligators, snakes and various waterfowl are also present in the lake, which is known for its goose hunting.

<i>Medionidus penicillatus</i> Species of bivalve

Medionidus penicillatus, the gulf moccasinshell, is a rare species of freshwater mussel in the family Unionidae, the river mussels. This aquatic bivalve mollusk is native to Alabama, Florida, and Georgia in the United States, where it is in decline and has been extirpated from most of the rivers it once inhabited. It is a federally listed endangered species of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northeast Georgia</span> Region of Georgia in the United States

Northeast Georgia is a region of Georgia in the United States. The northern part is also in the north Georgia mountains, while the southern part is still hilly but much flatter in topography. Northeast Georgia is also served by the Asheville/Spartanburg/Greenville/Anderson market.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council's recent study, Florida is one of 14 states predicted to face "high risk" water shortages by the year 2050. The state's water is primarily drawn from the Floridan Aquifer as well as from the St. Johns River, the Suwannee River, and the Ocklawaha River. Florida's regional water conflicts stem primarily from the fact that the majority of the fresh water supply is found in the rural north, while the bulk of the population, and therefore water consumption, resides in the south. Metropolitan municipalities in central and south Florida have neared their aquifer extraction limit of 650 million US gallons (2,500,000 m3) per day, leading to the search for new, extra-regional sources.

War over Water usually means Water conflict. It may also refer to the following:

Limestone Creek is a stream in Georgia, and is a tributary of the Chattahoochee River. The creek is approximately 2.32 miles (3.73 km) long.

Flat Creek is a stream in Georgia, and is a tributary of the Chattahoochee River in Lake Lanier. The creek is approximately 5.09 miles (8.19 km) long.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Halloween darter</span> Species of fish

The Halloween darter is a small freshwater fish native to North America. It is found in Georgia and Alabama in the drainage basin of the Apalachicola River, specifically in the Flint River system and the Chattahoochee River system. It prefers shallow, fast-flowing areas with gravel bottoms in small and medium-sized rivers. It was first described in 2008, having not previously been distinguished from the Blackbanded darter (P. nigrofasciata), formerly though to occur in the same watershed. Blackbanded darter has since been split again with Westfall's darter now recognised from the Apalachicola drainage. The species is somewhat variable, being generally blackish dorsally, with some individuals having indistinct saddle-like barring. Males have orange and dark lateral striping while females have dark stripes and a yellowish-green belly. At a maximum standard length of 101 mm (4 in), males are slightly larger than females, and both sexes develop distinctive orange barring on the edge of the first dorsal fin during the breeding season.

Florida v. Georgia, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in an original jurisdiction case. It involves a long-running dispute over waters within the ACF River Basin, running from the north Georgia mountains through metro Atlanta to the Florida panhandle, which is managed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Waters in the area have been stressed by the population growth of Atlanta over previous decades. The immediate case stemmed from droughts in 2011 and 2012 that caused economic damage to Florida due to lower water flows from the ACF River Basin into the panhandle, impacting its seafood production; Florida sought relief to have more water allocated towards them from the ACF by placing a water allocation cap on Georgia. The Supreme Court assigned a special master to review Florida's complaint, but ultimately found in 2016 that Florida had not fully demonstrated the need for more allocation. Florida challenged this determination to the Supreme Court. On June 27, 2018, the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that the special master had not properly considered Florida's argument and remanded the case to be reheard and reviewed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Point Lake</span> Lake in Georgia, U.S.

West Point Lake is a man-made reservoir located mostly in west-central Georgia on the Chattahoochee River and maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The Chattahoochee river flows in from the north, before flowing through the West Point Dam, which impounds the lake, and continuing to Columbus, Georgia. Of the four major USACE lakes in the ACF River Basin, West Point Lake is the smallest by area containing 25,864 acres (10,467 ha) of water, and has the second shortest shoreline at 604 mi (972 km). The purposes of the reservoir are to provide flood control, hydroelectric power, and water storage to aid the navigation of the lower Chattahoochee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buford Dam</span> Dam in Buford, Georgia, U.S.

Buford Dam is a dam in Buford, Georgia which is located at the southern end of Lake Lanier, a reservoir formed by the construction of the dam in 1956. The dam itself is managed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.

References

  1. Rankin, Bill (July 25, 2009). "Decades before water wars, Buford Dam won city support, not finances". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved March 19, 2011.[ dead link ]
  2. "History". Lake Sidney Lanier. US Army Corps of Engineers. Archived from the original on July 28, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  3. 1 2 3 "Water Wars Background". Alabama Rivers Alliance. Archived from the original on May 30, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  4. "Tri-State Water Wars History". Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Website. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  5. 1 2 Bryan, Hobson. "Interstate Water Disputes". Encyclopedia of Alabama. University of Alabama. Archived from the original on December 13, 2010. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  6. Lathrop, Alyssa. "A Tale of Three States: Equitable Apportionment of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin" (PDF). Florida State University Law Review. The Florida State University College of Law. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 6, 2010. Retrieved March 27, 2011.
  7. Proceedings of the 2005 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held April 25–27, 2005, at the University of Georgia. Kathryn J. Hatcher, editor, Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
  8. "Florida, Alabama, Georgia water sharing". Water Webster. Archived from the original on June 24, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  9. "Judge Rules in Tri-State Water Wars that Atlanta Can't Take Water from Lake Lanier". Southern Environmental Law Center. Archived from the original on January 5, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  10. Rankin, Bill (October 5, 2009). "Judge again rules against Georgia in water fight". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on September 3, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2011.
  11. "ACF Master Water Control Manual Update". US Army Corps of Engineers. Archived from the original on August 26, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2013.
  12. "USACE extends public scoping to next year". US Army Corps of Engineers. Archived from the original on March 12, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2013.
  13. "SCOTUSblog Case File, Florida v. Georgia". SCOTUSblog. Archived from the original on February 21, 2015. Retrieved February 22, 2015.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Shelton, Stacy (January 6, 2003). "Water wars: GOP shift new reality as tri-state talks begin". Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Archived from the original on May 22, 2011. Retrieved March 21, 2011.
  15. "Metro Atlanta 7th largest in population". Atlanta Business Chronicle. August 4, 2010. Archived from the original on October 30, 2010. Retrieved March 27, 2011.
  16. 1 2 Bethea, Sally. "Charting a New Course for Georgia's Water Security". Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved March 27, 2011.
  17. Brumbeck, Kate (March 21, 2011). "Deal encouraged by early talks in water war". The Times. Retrieved March 27, 2011.[ dead link ]
  18. Hutson, Susan. "Alabama Water Use, 2005" (PDF). U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 17, 2012. Retrieved March 27, 2011.
  19. "Neighbor Of Thirsty Georgia Faces No Water Restrictions". Planetizen. Archived from the original on July 5, 2008. Retrieved March 24, 2011.
  20. "Water Management". Archived from the original on August 8, 2014. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  21. 1 2 "Tri-State Water Wars". Southern Environmental Law Center. Archived from the original on March 24, 2011. Retrieved March 20, 2011.
  22. Blackwood, Harris (December 8, 2008). "Tri-state water wars fought on many fronts". The Times. Retrieved April 1, 2011.[ dead link ]
  23. 1 2 Boulard, Gary (March 2008). "Hot water: states need water like never before, which creates competition but also cooperation" . State Legislatures. 34 (3): 21. Gale   A175351410.
  24. Tyrnauer, Stuart. "Tri State Water Wars". A Solution to the Lake Lanier Water Dilemma. Archived from the original on August 19, 2011. Retrieved March 22, 2011.
  25. "Tri-State Conservation Coalition". Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011. Retrieved March 22, 2011.
  26. "12th Annual ADEM Drinking Water Branch Surface Water Meeting" (PDF). Alabama Department of Environmental Management. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2011. Retrieved March 20, 2011.
  27. "Amicus Brief in Tristate Water Allocation Dispute". Alabama Rivers Alliance. Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved March 20, 2011.
  28. Ruhl, J.B. (June 2005). "Water Wars, Eastern Style: Divvying Up the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin" (PDF). Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education (131): 47–54. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 24, 2011. Retrieved April 18, 2011.