Truth Decay (book)

Last updated
Truth Decay
Truth Decay (book).jpg
AuthorJennifer Kavanagh and Michael Rich
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
GenreNon-fiction
PublisherRAND Corporation
Publication date
January 16, 2018

Truth Decay is a non-fiction book by Jennifer Kavanagh and Michael D. Rich. Published by the RAND Corporation on January 16, 2018, [1] the book examines historical trends such as "yellow journalism" and "new journalism" to demonstrate that "truth decay" is not a new phenomenon in American society. [2] The authors argue that the divergence between individuals over objective facts and the concomitant increase in the relative "volume and influence of opinion over fact" in civil and political discourse has historically proliferated American society and culminated in truth decay.

Contents

The term "truth decay" was suggested by Sonni Efron and adopted by the authors of the book to characterize four interrelated trends in American society.

Kavanagh and Rich describe the "drivers" of truth decay as cognitive prejudices, transformation of information systems, competing demands on the education system, and polarization. [2] This has consequences on various aspects of American society. The authors argue that truth decay has engendered the deterioration of "civil discourse" and "political paralysis". [2] This has culminated in an increasing withdrawal of individuals from institutional sites of discourse throughout modern American society.

Truth Decay was positively received by audiences. The book was a nonfiction bestseller in the United States. [3] Indeed, Barack Obama included the "very interesting" book in his 2018 reading list. [4] Further, it stimulated a panel discussion at the University of Sydney on the role of media institutions in society and the ways in which democratic governance and civic engagement can be improved. [5]

Publishing history

Truth Decay was first published as a web-only book on January 16, 2018, by the RAND corporation. [6] This allowed individuals to read the book online without incurring any costs. On 26 January 2018, physical copies of the book were also published by the RAND corporation and made available for order on websites such as Amazon and Apple Books. [7]

The RAND corporation is a non-profit and nonpartisan research organization that is based in California. [8] It is concerned about the social, economic and political dangers that truth decay poses to the decision making processes of individuals in society. Kavanagh, a senior political scientist, has expressed concern that there is an increasing number of people in America and Europe are doubtful of climate change and the efficacy of vaccines. [9]

The term truth decay

In Chapter 1, Kavanagh and Rich introduce the term “truth decay”. The term “truth decay” was suggested by Sonni Efron and adopted by the authors of the book to characterize four interrelated trends in American society, including:

Kavanagh and Rich differentiate truth decay from “fake news”. The authors argue that phenomena such as “fake news” have not, in themselves, catalyzed the shift away from objective facts in political and civil discourse. The authors allege that “fake news” constitutes an aspect of truth decay and the associated challenges arising from the diminishing faith in historically authoritative sources of accurate information such as government, media and education. [6] Notwithstanding this distinction, the authors argue that the expression “fake news” has been intentionally deployed by politicians such as Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to diminish the accuracy and facticity of information promulgated by sources that do not align with their partisan position. In that context, the authors argue that a limited focus on phenomena such as “fake news” inhibits a vigorous analysis of the causes and consequences of truth decay in society.

Structure and major arguments

Truth Decay is organized in six chapters and explores three historical eras — the 1890s, 1920s, and 1960s — for historical evidence of the four trends of Truth Decay. [2] The authors argue that Truth Decay is “not a new phenomenon” as there has been a sustained increase in the volume and influence of opinion over fact throughout the last century.

Historical context

In Chapter 3, the book explores three eras — the 1890s, 1920s, and 1960s — for historical evidence of the aforementioned four trends of truth decay in American society.

Gilded Age

Depiction of a young woman being strip-searched by imposing Spanish policemen (Illustrator: Frederic Remington) Spaniards search women 1898.jpg
Depiction of a young woman being strip-searched by imposing Spanish policemen (Illustrator: Frederic Remington)

First, the authors identify the 1880s–1890s as the "Gilded Age". This historical era commenced after the American Civil War and was punctuated by the industrialization of America. [10] The introduction of printing technology increased the output of newspaper publishers. This stimulated competition within the newspaper publishing industry. [10] In New York City, major newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and William Hearst engaged in "yellow journalism" by deploying a sensationalist style of covering politics, world events and crime in order to fend off competitors and attract market share. [6] The authors note that these publishers also deployed "yellow journalism" to advance the partisan political objectives of their respective news organizations. For example, in April 1898, the New York Journal owned by Hearst published a number of articles with bold headlines, violent images and aggrandized information to position the Cubans as "innocent" people being "persecuted by the illiberal Spanish" regime and thereby emphasize the propriety of America's intervention in the Spanish-American War to the audience. [11] Thus, "yellow journalism" caused a conflation of opinions and objectively verifiable facts in society.

Roaring Twenties and the Great Depression

Second, the authors identify the 1920s–1930s as the Roaring Twenties and the Great Depression. This historical era was renowned as another period of economic growth and development that catalysed significant changes in the American media industry. The authors argue that radio broadcasting and tabloid journalism emerged as a dramatized form of media that focused on news surrounding public figures such as politicians, actors, musicians and sports athletes as entertainment rather than reliable and accurate information for the audience to utilise in considered decision-making. [6] As such, "jazz journalism" is alleged to have amplified the conflation of opinions and objectively verifiable facts in society.

The Civil Rights Movement

Third, the authors identify the 1960s–1970s as the period of "civil rights and social unrest". This historical era was punctuated by America's involvement in the Vietnam War. Television news was used to disseminate information which portrayed the appropriateness and success of America's involvement in the Vietnam War to the audience. Kavanagh and Rich argue that this increasingly conflated opinion and objective facts to advance partisan objectives. [6] The Civil Rights movement in the 1960s contributed to a transformation in news reporting. Journalists began to deploy first-person narration in their reporting of world events to illuminate the inequities faced by African American citizens who strived for recognition and civil rights. On its face, this incidence of "new journalism" increased the risk of reporters imbuing their work with personal biases. [12] Nonetheless, Bainer suggests that "new journalism" also augmented reporting as it permitted journalists to disseminate information on matters without the hollow pretence of objective reporting. [13]

Current drivers

In Chapter 4, Kavanagh and Rich describe the "drivers" of the aforementioned four trends of truth decay as cognitive prejudices, transformation of information systems and cuts to the education sector. [6]

Cognitive prejudices

First, cognitive prejudices are described as systematic errors in rational thinking that transpire when individuals are absorbing information. Confirmation bias is the propensity to identify and prioritise information that supports a pre-existing worldview. [14] This has a number of impacts on the process of individual decision-making. [14] The authors argue that individuals consciously or unconsciously employ motivated reasoning to resist accepting information that challenges their pre-existing worldview. [15] This causes the interface with invalidating information to further ingrain the partisan opinions of individuals. It is alleged by the authors that, in the long term, cognitive prejudices have created "political, sociodemographic, and economic polarisation" as individuals form cliques that are diametrically opposed in their worldview and communication, thereby attenuating the quality civil discourse in American society. [16]

Transformation of information systems

Second, the transformation of information systems refers to the surge in the "volume and speed of news" that is disseminated to individuals. The authors note that the move towards a "24-hour news cycle" has increased the number of competitors to traditional news organizations. [6] This competition, it is said, has reduced profitability and compelled news organizations such as ABC and Fox to pivot from costly investigative journalism to sensationalized opinion as a less-costly method of attracting an audience. [6] The increase in the quantity of opinion rather than objectively discernible fact in reporting is further exacerbated by the introduction of social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. These social media platforms facilitate rapid access to, and dissemination of, opinion news to millions of users.

Cuts to the educational sector

U.S. Federal Budget Deficit from 2018 to 2027 U.S. Federal Deficit Stacked Bar Chart - 2018 to 2027.png
U.S. Federal Budget Deficit from 2018 to 2027

Third, the authors allege that cuts to the educational sector have catalyzed a reduction in the critical thinking and media literacy education of individuals. Kavanagh and Rich argue that individuals utilise the information and critical thinking skills established in traditionally authoritative sites of discourse such as secondary schools and universities to make decisions. [6] Financial constraints associated with the swelling federal budget deficit from 2010 to 2021 have precipitated cuts to the funding apportioned to the American education sector. [17] The authors argue that this has meant that, in the face of the increasing volume of online news, fewer students have acquired the technical and emotional skills to identify the explicit and implicit biases of reporters and thereby critically assess the accuracy and reliability of information emanating from sources such as the government and media. [18] Ranschaert uses data gained through a longitudinal study of social studies teachers to argue that the decline in individuals relying on teachers for authoritative information has serious implications for ability of the education system to act as a buffer against truth decay. [18] The authors go further than Ranschaert by arguing that, in the long term, this has resulted in a constituency that is vulnerable to absorbing and promoting misinformation as the skill to delineate objective facts from misinformation has atrophied. In that context, the disparity between the media literacy education of students and the challenges posed by Internet technology is said to engender truth decay. [18]

Current consequences

In Chapter 5, Kavanagh and Rich describe the consequences of truth decay in America.

Deterioration of civil discourse in society

Violent protests at the Minnesota Capitol Stop The Steal, St. Paul (50712391846).jpg
Violent protests at the Minnesota Capitol

First, it is alleged that truth decay manifests in the deterioration of civil discourse in modern American society. [6] The authors define civil discourse as vigorous dialogue that attempts to promote the public interest. [6] It follows that, in the absence of a baseline set of objective facts, the authors suggest that the ability for individuals and politicians to meaningfully listen and engage in a constructive dialogue about economics, science and policy is diminished.

Political paralysis

Second, truth decay is alleged to manifest in "political paralysis". [6] The authors note that the deterioration of civil discourse and increasing dispute about objective facts has created a deep chasm between conservative and liberal politicians in America. [6] A case study on the increasing use of the filibuster in the United States Senate between 1947 and 2017 is used to suggest that truth decay has culminated in conservative and liberal politicians being increasingly unable to compromise on a range of policy initiatives. This incurs short term economic costs for the U.S. economy as the government becomes rigid an unable to respond promptly to domestic crises that require direct intervention. [19] For example, America's federal government shut down in 2013 due to the inability of the Senate to pass the Affordable Care Act. The lack of funding for federal operations resulted in a $24 billion loss to the economy. [17] In the long term, political paralysis also causes the U.S. to drop in international standing.

Withdrawal of individuals from institutional sites of discourse

Third, truth decay is alleged to have engendered the withdrawal of individuals from institutional sites of discourse. [6] The authors argue that the decrease of faith in education institutions, media and government among young voters aged between 18 and 29 precipitated the consistent decrease in the overall number of votes cast in the U.S federal election from 2004 to 2016. [6] This decrease in the exercise of civic responsibility through voting may, in the long run, diminish the ability of citizens to scrutinise state power, thereby diminishing policy making and overall accountability.

Reception

Truth Decay was positively received by American audiences. The book debuted as a Nonfiction Bestseller in 2018. On Amazon.com, the book is rated 4.3 stars out of 5 stars. [3]

The book subsequently stimulated a panel discussion at the University of Sydney. [20] On 22 August 2018, Michael Rich joined Professor Simon Jackman, John Barron, Nick Enfield and Lisa Bero for a discussion of the causes and consequences of truth decay in modern society. [20] This panel was co-hosted by the RAND Australia and the United States Studies Centre.

Excerpts from the book were published by CNN, [21] ABC [22] and the Washington Post. [23] An article on the ABC website reported on the "troubling trend" of truth decay which was "exposed" by the authors of the book. [22]

Barack Obama included the "very interesting" book in his 2018 summer reading list. [4] Obama noted that "a selective sorting of facts and evidence" is deceitful and corrosive to civil discourse. [4] This is because "society has always worked best when reasoned debate and practical problem-solving thrive". [4] This notion was echoed by Cãtãlina Nastasiu, who lauded the "ambitious exploratory work" because it "serves as a base to better understand the information ecosystem". [24]

Related Research Articles

Journalism is the production and distribution of reports on the interaction of events, facts, ideas, and people that are the "news of the day" and that informs society to at least some degree of accuracy. The word, a noun, applies to the occupation, the methods of gathering information, and the organizing literary styles.

Media bias occurs when journalists and news producers show bias in how they report and cover news. The term "media bias" implies a pervasive or widespread bias contravening of the standards of journalism, rather than the perspective of an individual journalist or article. The direction and degree of media bias in various countries is widely disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sensationalism</span> Type of editorial tactic used in mass media

In journalism and mass media, sensationalism is a type of editorial tactic. Events and topics in news stories are selected and worded to excite the greatest number of readers and viewers. This style of news reporting encourages biased or emotionally loaded impressions of events rather than neutrality, and may cause a manipulation to the truth of a story. Sensationalism may rely on reports about generally insignificant matters and portray them as a major influence on society, or biased presentations of newsworthy topics, in a trivial, or tabloid manner, contrary to general assumptions of professional journalistic standards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizen journalism</span> Journalism genre

Citizen journalism, also known as collaborative media, participatory journalism, democratic journalism, guerrilla journalism or street journalism, is based upon members of the community playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing, and disseminating news and information. Courtney C. Radsch defines citizen journalism "as an alternative and activist form of news gathering and reporting that functions outside mainstream media institutions, often as a response to shortcomings in the professional journalistic field, that uses similar journalistic practices but is driven by different objectives and ideals and relies on alternative sources of legitimacy than traditional or mainstream journalism". Jay Rosen offers a simpler definition: "When the people formerly known as the audience employ the press tools they have in their possession to inform one another." The underlying principle of citizen journalism is that ordinary people, not professional journalists, can be the main creators and distributors of news. Citizen journalism should not be confused with community journalism or civic journalism, both of which are practiced by professional journalists; collaborative journalism, which is the practice of professional and non-professional journalists working together; and social journalism, which denotes a digital publication with a hybrid of professional and non-professional journalism.

<i>Public Opinion</i> (book) 1922 book by Walter Lippmann

Public Opinion is a book by Walter Lippmann published in 1922. It is a critical assessment of functional democratic government, especially of the irrational and often self-serving social perceptions that influence individual behavior and prevent optimal societal cohesion. The detailed descriptions of the cognitive limitations people face in comprehending their sociopolitical and cultural environments, leading them to apply an evolving catalogue of general stereotypes to a complex reality, rendered Public Opinion a seminal text in the fields of media studies, political science, and social psychology.

Fact-checking is the process of verifying the factual accuracy of questioned reporting and statements. Fact-checking can be conducted before or after the text or content is published or otherwise disseminated. Internal fact-checking is such checking done in-house by the publisher to prevent inaccurate content from being published; when the text is analyzed by a third party, the process is called external fact-checking.

Media democracy is a democratic approach to media studies that advocates for the reform of mass media to strengthen public service broadcasting and develop participation in alternative media and citizen journalism in order to create a mass media system that informs and empowers all members of society and enhances democratic values.

Journalistic objectivity is a considerable notion within the discussion of journalistic professionalism. Journalistic objectivity may refer to fairness, disinterestedness, factuality, and nonpartisanship, but most often encompasses all of these qualities. First evolving as a practice in the 18th century, a number of critiques and alternatives to the notion have emerged since, fuelling ongoing and dynamic discourse surrounding the ideal of objectivity in journalism.

Advocacy journalism is a genre of journalism that adopts a non-objective viewpoint, usually for some social or political purpose.

Journalistic ethics and standards comprise principles of ethics and good practice applicable to journalists. This subset of media ethics is known as journalism's professional "code of ethics" and the "canons of journalism". The basic codes and canons commonly appear in statements by professional journalism associations and individual print, broadcast, and online news organizations.

Claims of media bias generally focus on the idea of media outlets reporting news in a way that seems partisan. Other claims argue that outlets sometimes sacrifice objectivity in pursuit of growth or profits.

Michael D. Rich is President Emeritus at RAND Corporation. Rich was the fifth president and CEO of the Santa Monica, California-based research institution, succeeding James A. Thomson, who had led RAND from 1989 to 2011. Rich was appointed as President and CEO in November 2011 and served in that role until his retirement in 2022. Rich was succeeded by current RAND President and CEO Jason Gaverick Matheny.

Peace journalism is a style and theory of reporting that aims to treat stories about war and conflict with balance, in contrast to war journalism, which peace journalism advocates say display a bias toward violence. The theory proposes practical methods for correcting biases in stories appearing in the mainstream and alternative media, and suggests ways for journalists to work with other media professionals, audiences, and organizations in conflict.

<i>Scandal: How "Gotcha" Politics Is Destroying America</i> Book by Lanny Davis

Scandal: How 'Gotcha' Politics Is Destroying America is a 2006 book by Lanny Davis, a lawyer who was special counsel to Bill Clinton, an appointee under George W. Bush, and advisor to Hillary Clinton during her then-upcoming 2008 campaign. The theme of the book is "that both [major political] parties [in the United States] have to learn to have civil debate, the[n] solve people's problem[s]," by working together in a bipartisan fashion. Moreover, Davis predicts that centrist 'purple' politicians could build a winning bipartisan coalition in that manner, in particular by winning over 'angry' independent voters fed up with scandal-mongering and incivility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political journalism</span> Political reporter

Political journalism is a broad branch of journalism that includes coverage of all aspects of politics and political science, although the term usually refers specifically to coverage of civil governments and political power.

Civil discourse refers to respectful conversation aimed at fostering understanding and constructive communication, where individuals within a group share different perspectives, enhancing the learning experience. It is a fundamental aspect of freedom of speech, characterized by dialogue that supports the societal good." Members of the U.S. Supreme Court session in 2011 aptly described civil discourse as "robust, honest, frank and constructive dialogue and deliberation that seeks to advance the public interest." Arguments are grounded in reason and evidence, adhering to strict guidelines for the appropriate behavior to be practiced. In contrast, uncivil discourse contains direct insults, unwarranted attributions of motive, and open contempt."

Post-truth politics, amidst varying academic and dictionary definitions of the term, refer to a recent historical period where political culture is marked by public anxiety about what claims can be publicly accepted facts. It suggests that the public distinction between truth and falsity—as well as honesty and lying—have become a focal concern of public life, and are viewed by popular commentators and academic researchers alike as having a consequential role in how politics operates in the early 21st century. It is regarded as especially being influenced by the arrival of new communication and media technologies. Popularized as a term in news media and a dictionary definition, post-truth has developed from a short-hand label for the abundance and influence of misleading or false political claims into a concept empirically studied and theorized by academic research. Oxford Dictionaries declared that its international word of the year in 2016 was "post-truth", citing a 20-fold increase in usage compared to 2015, and noted that it was commonly associated with the noun "post-truth politics".

Piers Gregory Robinson is a British academic researcher in the field of media studies. He is also a co-director of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies and a founder of the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (SPM). He has authored a number of publications on the CNN effect. He has attracted criticism for disputing the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ad Fontes Media</span> Media watchdog organization

Ad Fontes Media, Inc. is a Colorado-based, media watchdog, public benefit corporation primarily known for its Media Bias Chart, which rates media sources in terms of political bias and reliability. The organization was founded in 2018 by patent attorney Vanessa Otero with the goal of combating political polarization and media bias. Ad Fontes Media uses a panel of analysts across the political spectrum to evaluate articles for the Chart.

Adversarial journalism refers to a kind of journalism or a journalistic role where the journalist adopts an oppositional and combative style of reporting and interviewing. The goal of adversarial journalism is to reveal supposed wrongdoings of actors under investigation. Instead of being completely impartial, adversarial journalists take sides in what they believe to be true. They deliberately combine information with commentary or opinion in their writing. In particular, adversarial journalists remain relentlessly hostile and highly skeptical regarding government, big business companies, and political events, questions, institutions and personalities. Adversarial journalism is thought to be traditional in liberal democracies where journalism is regarded as a "Fourth Estate". It is also considered an extreme form of participant journalism or advocacy journalism. It has been contrasted with public or civic journalism.

References

  1. ↑ The era of "truth decay": 12 things we still don't know about our weird time, Laura Hazard Owen, Nieman Lab, 2018-01-26
  2. 1 2 3 4 Kavanagh, Jennifer; Rich, Michael D. (2018). "TRUTH DECAY: A Threat to Policymaking and Democracy". RAND Corporation.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. 1 2 Kavanagh, Jennifer; Rich, Michael D. (2018-01-26). Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND. ISBN   978-0-8330-9994-5.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Michael Schaub (2018-06-18). "Obama shares his June reading list, but don't expect any beach reads". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  5. ↑ Truth Decay: Exploring the diminishing role of facts and analysis, United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney, 2018-08-22
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Kavanagh, Jennifer; Rich, Michael D. (16 January 2018). Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life.
  7. ↑ Truth Decay.
  8. ↑ Monica, 1776 Main Street Santa; California 90401-3208. "About the RAND Corporation". www.rand.org. Retrieved 2022-04-29.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  9. ↑ Kavanagh, Michael D. Rich and Jennifer. "'Fake news' and 'Truth Decay' threaten America. How can we revive respect for facts?". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2022-04-29.
  10. 1 2 Nerone, John (1992). "The Media and American Society". OAH Magazine of History. 6 (4): 14–19. doi:10.1093/maghis/6.4.14. ISSN   0882-228X. JSTOR   25154080.
  11. ↑ "How Yellow Journalism Sparked the Spanish-American War". History. 2019-04-16. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
  12. ↑ Oxford bibliographies. Communication. Patricia Moy, Oxford University Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-975684-1. OCLC   711563452.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  13. ↑ Pauly, John J (July 2014). "The New Journalism and the struggle for interpretation". Journalism. 15 (5): 589–604. doi:10.1177/1464884914529208. ISSN   1464-8849. S2CID   145131817.
  14. 1 2 Hertel, Paula T.; Mathews, Andrew (November 2011). "Cognitive Bias Modification: Past Perspectives, Current Findings, and Future Applications". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 6 (6): 521–536. doi:10.1177/1745691611421205. ISSN   1745-6916. PMID   26168375. S2CID   1359292.
  15. ↑ Dandeneau, Stéphane D.; Baldwin, Mark W. (August 2004). "The Inhibition of Socially Rejecting Information Among People with High Versus Low Self-Esteem: The Role of Attentional Bias and the Effects of Bias Reduction Training". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 23 (4): 584–603. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.4.584.40306. ISSN   0736-7236.
  16. ↑ Campante, Filipe R.; Hojman, Daniel A. (2013-04-01). "Media and polarization: Evidence from the introduction of broadcast TV in the United States". Journal of Public Economics. 100: 79–92. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.02.006. ISSN   0047-2727.
  17. 1 2 Labonte, Marc. The FY2014 government shutdown: economic effects. OCLC   1104212236.
  18. 1 2 3 Ranschaert, Rachel (2020-09-02). "Authority and Carnival: Preservice Teachers' Media Literacy Education in a Time of Truth Decay". Educational Studies. 56 (5): 519–536. doi:10.1080/00131946.2020.1799219. ISSN   0013-1946. S2CID   222213245.
  19. ↑ Abrams, Samuel J (2007-08-16). "Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches". Perspectives on Politics. 5 (3): 642. doi: 10.1017/s1537592707071873 . ISSN   1537-5927. S2CID   145761690.
  20. 1 2 "Truth decay: Exploring the diminishing role of facts and analysis — United States Studies Centre". www.ussc.edu.au. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  21. ↑ Why 'truth decay' is getting worse - CNN Video, 29 December 2019, retrieved 2022-05-02
  22. 1 2 "The fight for truth: How misinformation and disinformation can lead to 'chaos, civil war'". ABC Action News Tampa Bay (WFTS). 2021-01-25. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  23. ↑ Will, George F. (2018-01-25). "Opinion | When the whole country becomes a campus safe space". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2023-08-07.
  24. ↑ Nastasiu, Cătălina (2020-07-01). "Book review of 'Truth Decay. An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life' by Jennifer Kavanagh and Michael D. Rich, RAND Corporation, 2017, 324 p." Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations. 22 (2): 133–135. doi: 10.21018/rjcpr.2020.2.305 . ISSN   2344-5440. S2CID   225559910.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.