United States v. Rogers

Last updated

United States v. Rogers
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued March 2, 1846
Decided March 9, 1846
Full case nameUnited States v. William S. Rogers
Citations45 U.S. 567 ( more )
4 How. 567; 11 L. Ed. 1105
Holding
A white man, adopted into an Indian tribe, does not become an Indian for the purposes of criminal jurisdiction.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Roger B. Taney
Associate Justices
John McLean  · James M. Wayne
John Catron  · John McKinley
Peter V. Daniel  · Samuel Nelson
Levi Woodbury
Case opinion
MajorityTaney

United States v. Rogers, 45 U.S. (4 How.) 567 (1846), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States holding that a white man, adopted into an Indian tribe, does not become an Indian for the purposes of criminal jurisdiction.

Contents

Background

In 1844, William S. Rogers, a white man and Cherokee Nation citizen by marriage, who murdered his brother-in-law Jacob Nicholson, another white man and Cherokee Nation citizen by marriage. [1] [2] Rogers was from Tennessee and enlisted in June 1836 to help with Cherokee removal. He was discharged a month later and married a Cherokee woman in November 1836 and was removed with her to Indian Territory. [3] Rogers wife died in 1843 and he murdered Nicholson for an unknown reason on September 1, 1844, within the Cherokee Nation in Indian Territory. [4] On April 2, 1845, Cherokee Nation Sheriff Alexander Foreman captured Rogers and he was given to the federal garrison at Fort Gibson pending a trial in the Cherokee Nation's courts. [5]

Within two weeks of his arrest, Rogers was sent to Little Rock for trial in federal court. [6] Rogers was indicted for the murder of Jacob Nicholson by the grand jury for the United States District Court for the District of Arkansas. [7]

Lower court case

On April 18, 1845, Rogers plead pro se that since he and his victim were both Cherokee citizens the federal government lacked jurisdiction under the Trade and Intercourse Act of 1834. [6] While Judge Benjamin Johnson agreed the United States lacked jurisdiction, Justice Peter V. Daniel disagreed while in town riding the circuit which triggered an automatic appeal under the Judiciary Act of 1793. [8]

Oral Arguments

On May 12, 1845, Rogers escaped the Little Rock Jail with another prisoner and drowned while crossing the Arkansas River. Two months after Rogers' death, the district court clerk for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arkansas certified the record of the case for appeal while failing to notify the court of Rogers' death. In March 1846 the court heard oral arguments from U.S. attorney general John Y. Mason and no one appeared for the defense. [9]

Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the opinion of the court. Taney noted that while the Cherokee nation and their treaties with the United States did have bearing, Rogers was "was still a white man, of the white race, and therefore not within the exception in the act of Congress." He noted the act's jurisdictional "exception is confined to those who by the usages and customs of the Indians are regarded as belonging to their race. It does not speak of members of a tribe, but of the race generally." [7]

The Rogers test, derived from the cases, is used for determining whether a defendant is an "Indian" under federal law for purposes of criminal jurisdiction. Under the test, courts look for both "Indian blood" and recognition as an Indian (usually interpreted as citizenship in a federally recognized tribe). [10]

Analysis

Law professor Bethany R. Berger notes the decision is inconsistent with Taney's other writing on Indian law and likely was heavily written by or copied from arguments made by U.S. attorney Samuel Hempstead and attorney general John Y. Mason. [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cherokee</span> Indigenous American people of the southeastern United States

The Cherokee people are one of the Indigenous peoples of the Southeastern Woodlands of the United States. Prior to the 18th century, they were concentrated in their homelands, in towns along river valleys of what is now southwestern North Carolina, southeastern Tennessee, southwestern Virginia, edges of western South Carolina, northern Georgia and northeastern Alabama consisting of around 40,000 square miles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian Territory</span> Historic sovereign territory set aside for Native American nations, 1834–1907

Indian Territory and the Indian Territories are terms that generally described an evolving land area set aside by the United States government for the relocation of Native Americans who held original Indian title to their land as an independent nation-state. The concept of an Indian territory was an outcome of the U.S. federal government's 18th- and 19th-century policy of Indian removal. After the American Civil War (1861–1865), the policy of the U.S. government was one of assimilation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribal sovereignty in the United States</span> Type of political status of Native Americans

Tribal sovereignty in the United States is the concept of the inherent authority of Indigenous tribes to govern themselves within the borders of the United States.

Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978), is a United States Supreme Court case deciding that Indian tribal courts have no criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians. The case was decided on March 6, 1978 with a 6–2 majority. The court opinion was written by William Rehnquist, and a dissenting opinion was written by Thurgood Marshall, who was joined by Chief Justice Warren Burger. Justice William J. Brennan did not participate in the decision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Baldwin (judge)</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1830 to 1844

Henry Baldwin was an American judge who was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from January 6, 1830, to April 21, 1844.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians</span> Federally recognized tribe based in Oklahoma

The United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma is a federally recognized tribe of Cherokee Native Americans headquartered in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. According to the UKB website, its members are mostly descendants of "Old Settlers" or "Western Cherokees," those Cherokees who migrated from the Southeast to present-day Arkansas and Oklahoma around 1817. Some reports estimate that Old Settlers began migrating west by 1800, before the forced relocation of Cherokees by the United States in the late 1830s under the Indian Removal Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cherokee Nation</span> Native American tribe in Oklahoma, United States

The Cherokee Nation, formerly known as the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, is the largest of three federally recognized tribes of Cherokees in the United States. It includes people descended from members of the Old Cherokee Nation who relocated, due to increasing pressure, from the Southeast to Indian Territory and Cherokees who were forced to relocate on the Trail of Tears. The tribe also includes descendants of Cherokee Freedmen, Absentee Shawnee, and Natchez Nation. As of 2023, over 450,000 people were enrolled in the Cherokee Nation.

The Goingsnake Massacre refers to the eleven victims of a fatal shootout on April 15, 1872, that broke out during a murder and assault trial in the Cherokee court in the Goingsnake District of the Cherokee Nation The dead included three Cherokee on the defendant's side, including his attorney and a brother; a US Deputy Marshal and four members of his federal posse, plus three relatives of the Cherokee murder victim. Another ten men were wounded, including both Cherokee and white men.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural assimilation of Native Americans</span> By the US, into European–American culture

A series of efforts were made by the United States to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream European–American culture between the years of 1790 and 1920. George Washington and Henry Knox were first to propose, in the American context, the cultural assimilation of Native Americans. They formulated a policy to encourage the so-called "civilizing process". With increased waves of immigration from Europe, there was growing public support for education to encourage a standard set of cultural values and practices to be held in common by the majority of citizens. Education was viewed as the primary method in the acculturation process for minorities.

The Cherokee Freedmen controversy was a political and tribal dispute between the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and descendants of the Cherokee Freedmen regarding the issue of tribal membership. The controversy had resulted in several legal proceedings between the two parties from the late 20th century to August 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American recognition in the United States</span>

Native American recognition in the United States, for tribes, usually means being recognized by the United States federal government as a community of Indigenous people that has been in continual existence since prior to European contact, and which has a sovereign, government-to-government relationship with the Federal government of the United States. In the United States, the Native American tribe is a fundamental unit of sovereign tribal government. This recognition comes with various rights and responsibilities. The United States recognizes the right of these tribes to self-government and supports their tribal sovereignty and self-determination. These tribes possess the right to establish the legal requirements for membership. They may form their own government, enforce laws, tax, license and regulate activities, zone, and exclude people from tribal territories. Limitations on tribal powers of self-government include the same limitations applicable to states; for example, neither tribes nor states have the power to make war, engage in foreign relations, or coin money.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Jolly</span> Cherokee leader (died 1838)

John Jolly was a leader of the Cherokee in Tennessee, the Arkansaw district of the Missouri Territory, and Indian Territory. After a reorganization of the tribal government around 1818, he was made Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation–West. Jolly was a wealthy slave-owning planter, cow rancher, and merchant. In many ways, he lived the life of a Southern planter.

The Cherokee Male Seminary was a tribal college established in 1846 by the Cherokee Nation in Indian Territory. Opening in 1851, it was one of the first institutions of higher learning in the United States to be founded west of the Mississippi River.

Fellows v. Blacksmith, 60 U.S. 366 (1857), is a United States Supreme Court decision involving Native American law. John Blacksmith, a Tonawanda Seneca, sued agents of the Ogden Land Company for common law claims of trespass, assault, and battery after he was forcibly evicted from his sawmill by the Company's agents. The Court affirmed a judgement in Blacksmith's favor, notwithstanding the fact that the Seneca had executed an Indian removal treaty and the Company held the exclusive right to purchase to the land by virtue of an interstate compact ratified by Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aboriginal title in the Taney Court</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States, under Chief Justice Roger B. Taney (1836–1864), issued several important decisions on the status of aboriginal title in the United States, building on the opinions of aboriginal title in the Marshall Court.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal law in the Taney Court</span> Aspect of U.S. judicial history (1836–1864)

The Taney Court heard thirty criminal law cases, approximately one per year. Notable cases include Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842), United States v. Rogers (1846), Ableman v. Booth (1858), Ex parte Vallandigham (1861), and United States v. Jackalow (1862).

Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217 (1959), was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the State of Arizona does not have jurisdiction to try a civil case between a non-Indian doing business on a reservation with tribal members who reside on the reservation, the proper forum for such cases being the tribal court.

United States v. Ramsey, 271 U.S. 467 (1926), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the government had the authority to prosecute crimes against Native Americans (Indians) on reservation land that was still designated Indian Country by federal law. The Osage Indian Tribe held mineral rights that were worth millions of dollars. A white rancher, William K. Hale, devised a plot to kill tribal members to allow his nephew, who was married to a tribal member, to inherit the mineral rights. The tribe requested the assistance of the federal government, which sent Bureau of Investigation agents to solve the murders. Hale and several others were arrested and tried for the murders, but they claimed that the federal government did not have jurisdiction. The district court quashed the indictments, but on appeal, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the Osage lands were Indian Country and that the federal government therefore had jurisdiction. This put an end to the Osage Indian murders.

United States v. Antelope, 430 U.S. 641 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that American Indians convicted on reservation land were not deprived of the equal protection of the laws; (a) the federal criminal statutes are not based on impermissible racial classifications but on political membership in an Indian tribe or nation; and (b) the challenged statutes do not violate equal protection. Indians or non-Indians can be charged with first-degree murder committed in a federal enclave.

References

  1. Berger 2004, p. 1960.
  2. Berger 2004, p. 1983.
  3. Berger 2004, p. 1982.
  4. Berger 2004, p. 1983-1984.
  5. Berger 2004, p. 1984.
  6. 1 2 Berger 2004, p. 1989.
  7. 1 2 United States v. Rogers, 45 U.S. (4 How. ) 567 (1846)
  8. Berger 2004, p. 1991.
  9. Berger 2004, p. 1999.
  10. Summers 2018, p. 211.
  11. Berger 2004, p. 2004.

Works cited