William Bronston

Last updated

William Bronston
William Bronston.jpg
Bronston speaking at a conference in 1981
BornMarch 1939 (age 85)
Los Angeles, California, U.S.
Education
Children2
Parent
Relatives Olga Kameneva (grandmother)
Leon Trotsky (great-uncle)
Zinaida Volkova (great-aunt)
Nora Volkow (second cousin, once removed)

William Bronston (born March 1939) is an American psychiatrist and activist. Bronston is known for his involvement in the deinstitutionalization of Willowbrook State School in the early 1970s. After returning to California in 1975, Bronston became the medical director of the Department of Developmental Disabilities at the California Department of Health.

Contents

Early life and education

William Bronston was born in March 1939 to Bessarabian-born Jewish American film producer Samuel Bronston (1908–1994) and Ukrainian-American pianist Sara "Dony" Bronston (1911–1990). [1] Bronston was born in Los Angeles and raised in an affluent family in Beverly Hills, California. [2] He is the great-nephew to Russian Marxist revolutionary Leon Trotsky. [3] Bronston has one younger sister, as well as four other half or step-siblings. [4] Bronston's parents divorced when he was thirteen and he moved in with his father, while his sister stayed with their mother. [5]

Bronston attended West Hollywood Elementary School, Bancroft Junior High School, and Hollywood High School. [6] At sixteen, Bronston enrolled at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), as a pre-med major; influenced by art history classes he took at UCLA, Bronston switched majors to 20th-century history while also continuing his pre-med studies. [7] At twenty, Bronston married his first wife Janet, a flight attendant for Trans World Airlines (TWA), who he met two years earlier. [8] After being rejected from a number of medical schools, Bronston spent another year at UCLA, graduating in 1961 with a Bachelor of Arts in contemporary history with a minor in contemporary art history. [9]

University of Southern California and the Student Health Organization

At the USC School of Medicine, Bronston helped organize a series of lecture forums featuring eminent figures in medicine. USC Medical Student Forum poster.png
At the USC School of Medicine, Bronston helped organize a series of lecture forums featuring eminent figures in medicine.

After graduating from UCLA, Bronston attended the USC School of Medicine. [10] In his first year, Bronston completed a fellowship in pediatrics at the Child Therapy Clinic at the Children's Hospital Los Angeles under Richard Koch  [ Wikidata ], a professor of pediatrics at USC. [11] In September 1964, when Bronston was a senior, he helped organize the USC Medical Student Forum with sophomore Michael McGarvey and advice from former members of the Association of Internes and Medical Students (AIMS). [12] The USC Medical Student Forum was a series of lecture forums featuring a number of influential figures covering a variety of topics in medicine. [12] These included a forum on the legalization of abortion featuring Planned Parenthood president Alan Guttmacher, a forum on the health effects of Jim Crow laws featuring civil rights activist H. Jack Geiger and others featuring Michael Harrington, Thomas Szasz and Benjamin Spock. [13]

Inspired by the success of the forum, they also began the student newspaper Borborygmi (meaning "stomach rumbles") in 1964, which featured essays and editorials centering medical students. [13] In January 1965, Bronston and McGarvey transformed the lecture forums into the Student Medical Action Conference (SMAC), which integrated the forums with praxis by organizing various social and political public health projects. [14] After graduating from USC in spring 1965, Bronston flew cross-country to coordinate a national students movement in the health sciences, aided by his access to discounted flights from his wife's job at TWA. [15]

In October 1965, Bronston organized a national convention at the University of Chicago, where Bronston co-founded the Student Health Organization (SHO). [16] The SHO, whose name was based on the World Health Organization, was a product of the New Left and imagined a national organization of medical students similar to the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). [17]

Menninger School of Psychiatry

During his senior year of medical school, Bronston toured various post-doctoral programs in Sweden for intellectually disabled children, [18] but was unable to attend because of restrictions laid out by the draft board. [19] In 1965, Bronston chose to attend the residency program at the Menninger School of Psychiatry at Topeka State Hospital in Kansas. [20] Bronston's first wife Janet did not want to move to Kansas and the two separated that year. [21] At Topeka, Bronston led the predominantly African American direct support professionals in re-activating the dormant health workers' union and organizing a sit-in for improvements in wages and working conditions, [22] which led to him being expelled from the institution in June 1968. [23]

Career

In 1968, Bronston moved to New York City, where he worked as the primary physician in a Harlem poor people's medical center run by the Black Panther Party. [24] At the clinic, which was among the first neighborhood mental health clinics in Manhattan, Bronston worked as part of a survey team on nutrition. [25] Bronston, who was frustrated by the team's limited resources and impact, left in 1970 to become a staff physician at Willowbrook State School, a state facility housing 5,000 mentally disabled adults and children. [26] Bronston also organized a commune in a Victorian Staten Island home and moved in with Michael Wilkins and other friends. [27]

Willowbrook State School

A postcard of Willowbrook State School, where Bronston worked in the early 1970s Willowbrook State School (NYPL b15279351-105038) - cropped.jpg
A postcard of Willowbrook State School, where Bronston worked in the early 1970s

At Willowbrook, Bronston became of the chief medical officer of Building 76, which housed 200 disabled children. [28] Bronston reported being shocked by the institution's "general disregard of modern medical practice" and scheduled weekly meetings with Jack Hammond, the director of Willowbrook. [27] Their meetings went poorly, with Hammond objecting to Bronston's proposals to reform the system with concerns about practicalities. [27] In response to 1971 budget cuts and a "job freeze" at the institution, Bronston organized a campaign to send Wilkins and Bronston as the joint representatives of Willowbrook at the New York state medical convention. [29] The campaign was a failure and the opposition received unanimous support. [30]

After his campaign failure, Bronston attempted to reform Building 76, but his plans to re-organize the building's lines of authority, report accurate assessments of IQ and replicate the Swedish theory of normalization drew ire from the nursing and custodial staff. [31] Two months into his reform program, Hammond reprimanded Bronston, accusing him of breeding conflict and circumventing the established chain of command. [29] In lieu of termination—which Bronston was protected from by his civil service tenure—Bronston was transferred to Buildings 22 and 23, which housed 470 adult women who the staff considered the most difficult to control. [29] Bronston attempted to appeal his transfer, but his petitions were rejected. [32]

Transfer to Buildings 22 and 23

At Buildings 22 and 23, Bronston went public with his grievances and started a campaign to politicize the residents' condition as the direct result of negligence. [32] He held meetings with parents, where he brought in guest speakers from model programs and described radical changes that could be made to the institution. [32] Encouraged by Bronston's meetings, groups of parents began organizing at meetings of the Benevolent Society—the official organization of parents at Willowbrook—and other social workers at Willowbrook held their own meetings calling on parents to fight against the budget cuts. [33] In November 1971, Bronston invited Richard Koch  [ Wikidata ], his university professor, and Jane Kurtin, a reporter for the Staten Island Advance , to visit the facility. [34] Both Koch and Kurtin were shocked by the treatment at Willowbrook; Kurtin's report on the institution, "Inside the Cages", ran on the front page of the Advance and she went on to write multiple follow-up pieces. [34]

By the end of the month, a group of 100 parents led a demonstration around the institution, holding placards reading "stop the job freeze" and blocking traffic on Victory Boulevard. [35] At Benevolent Society meetings, parents began airing their complaints and listing non-negotiable demands to Hammond. [36] The Federation of Parents Organizations for the New York State Mental Institutions—the collective body coordinating all the Benevolent Societies—demanded that a grand jury be raised to investigate whether charges of criminal neglect could be brought against Willowbrook officials. [36] Director Hammond responded to Bronston's campaign by prohibiting meetings with parents at Willowbrook, later prohibiting all communications between Willowbrook staff and the media, and terminating the employment of Wilkins and Elizabeth Lee, who lacked tenure. [37] Hammond's efforts to suppress protest further emboldened parents and staff; by the last weeks of December, pickets were frequently held in front of Willowbrook and the Advance published numerous investigative reports on the institute. [38] In January 1972, Geraldo Rivera reported on Willowbrook in an influential ABC documentary on the institution and Bronston appeared frequently in talk shows and hearings to discuss his experiences at Willowbrook and criticize representatives for the state of New York. [39]

Litigation and Bronston's testimony

In March 1972, a group of fifty parents, lawyers and professionals including Bronston convened at the Mount Augustine Retreat House to plan and strategize a campaign to reform the institution. [40] Their meeting culminated in a class action suit headed by attorney Bruce Ennis. [41] Bronston supported Ennis's plan for a lawsuit and stayed at the institution to gather evidence for the case. [42] In September, Bronston took forty photographs documenting lacerations and lesions on patients he had treated at the institute. [43] During the trial, Bronston described the injuries he documented in detail and the effects of gross neglect and abuse at the institute. [42] Bronston's efforts in protesting and publicizing the conditions at Willowbrook culminated in 1975, when a state court ruling deinstitutionalized the facility. [44]

Return to California

Bronston returned to California in 1975 and became the medical director of the Department of Developmental Disabilities at the California Department of Health. [45] In California, Bronston was part of a growing group of clinicians opposed to the use of aversion therapy to treat developmental disorders. [3] In an influential 1979 memo to the director of the California Department of Developmental Services, Bronston recommended that the state of California end its relationship with the Behavior Research Institute. [46] Bronston's memo was successful in influencing director David Loberg to overturn a ruling mandating the North Los Angeles County Regional Center continue to fund the institute. [47]

Personal life and beliefs

Bronston supports the adoption of a single-payer healthcare system and is a member of the advocacy group Physicians for a National Health Program. [48] Bronston has twins: a son and daughter. [49]

Selected works

Related Research Articles

The disability rights movement is a global social movement that seeks to secure equal opportunities and equal rights for all people with disabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Willowbrook State School</span> Former institution for intellectually disabled children

Willowbrook State School was a state-supported institution for children with intellectual disabilities in the Willowbrook neighborhood of Staten Island in New York City, which operated from 1947 until 1987.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</span> United States law

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a piece of American legislation that ensures students with a disability are provided with a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) that is tailored to their individual needs. IDEA was previously known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) from 1975 to 1990. In 1990, the United States Congress reauthorized EHA and changed the title to IDEA. Overall, the goal of IDEA is to provide children with disabilities the same opportunity for education as those students who do not have a disability.

An Individualized Education Program (IEP) is a legal document under United States law that is developed for each public school child in the U.S. who needs special education. It is created through a team of the child's parent(s) and district personnel who are knowledgeable about the child's needs. IEPs must be reviewed every year to keep track of the child's educational progress.

Developmental disability is a diverse group of chronic conditions, comprising mental or physical impairments that arise before adulthood. Developmental disabilities cause individuals living with them many difficulties in certain areas of life, especially in "language, mobility, learning, self-help, and independent living". Developmental disabilities can be detected early on and persist throughout an individual's lifespan. Developmental disability that affects all areas of a child's development is sometimes referred to as global developmental delay.

Self-advocacy is the act of speaking up for oneself and one's interests. It is used as a name for civil rights movements and mutual aid networks for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The term arose in the broader civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, and is part of the disability rights movement. Today there are self-advocacy organizations across the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deinstitutionalisation</span> Replacement of psychiatric hospitals

Deinstitutionalisation is the process of replacing long-stay psychiatric hospitals with less isolated community mental health services for those diagnosed with a mental disorder or developmental disability. In the late 20th century, it led to the closure of many psychiatric hospitals, as patients were increasingly cared for at home, in halfway houses and clinics, in regular hospitals, or not at all.

A group home, congregate living facility, care home, adult family home, etc., is a structured and supervised residence model that provides assisted living and medical care for those with complex health needs. Traditionally, the model has been used for children or young people who cannot live with their families or afford their own homes, people with chronic disabilities who may be adults or seniors, or people with dementia and related aged illnesses. Typically, there are no more than six residents, and there is at least one trained caregiver there 24 hours a day. In some early "model programs", a house manager, night manager, weekend activity coordinator, and four part-time skill teachers were reported. Originally, the term group home referred to homes of 8 to 16 individuals, which was a state-mandated size during deinstitutionalization. Residential nursing facilities, also included in this article, may be as large as 100 individuals in 2015, which is no longer the case in fields such as intellectual and developmental disabilities. Depending on the severity of the condition requiring one to need to live in a group home, some clients are able to attend day programs and most clients are able to live normal lifestyles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judge Rotenberg Center</span> Controversial American special education institution

The Judge Rotenberg Center (JRC) is a controversial institution in Canton, Massachusetts, United States, for people with developmental disabilities and emotional and behavioral disorders. The center has been condemned for torture by the United Nations special rapporteur on torture. The JRC is known for its use of the graduated electronic decelerator (GED), a device that administers electric shocks to residents as part of the institution's behavior modification program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intellectual disability</span> Generalized neurodevelopmental disorder

Intellectual disability (ID), also known as general learning disability in the United Kingdom and formerly mental retardation, is a generalized neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significantly impaired intellectual and adaptive functioning. It is defined by an IQ under 70, in addition to deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors that affect everyday, general living. Intellectual functions are defined under the DSM-5 as reasoning, problem‑solving, planning, abstract thinking, judgment, academic learning, and learning from instruction and experience, and practical understanding confirmed by both clinical assessment and standardized tests. Adaptive behavior is defined in terms of conceptual, social, and practical skills involving tasks performed by people in their everyday lives.

Disability abuse is when a person with a disability is abused physically, financially, sexually and/or psychologically due to the person having a disability. This type of abuse has also been considered a hate crime. The abuse is not limited to those who are visibly disabled or physically deformed, but also includes those with learning, intellectual and developmental disabilities or mental illnesses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kennedy Krieger Institute</span> Hospital in Maryland, United States

The Kennedy Krieger Institute is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, Johns Hopkins affiliate located in Baltimore, Maryland, that provides in-patient and out-patient medical care, community services, and school-based programs for children and adolescents with learning disabilities, as well as disorders of the brain, spinal cord, and musculoskeletal system. The Institute provides services for children with developmental concerns mild to severe and is involved in research of various disorders, including new interventions and earlier diagnosis.

The Family Movement, also known in the past as the Parent Movement, is an arm of the disability rights movement, a larger social movement. The Family Movement advocates for the economic and social rights of family members with a disability. Key elements include: social inclusion; active participation; a life of meaning; safety; economic security; accessibility and self-determination. The family movement has been critical in closing institutions and other segregated facilities; promoting inclusive education; reforming adult guardianship to the current supported decisionmaking; increasing access to health care; developing real jobs; fighting stereotypes and reducing discrimination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Letchworth Village</span> Hospital in New York, United States

Letchworth Village was a residential institution located in Rockland County, New York, in the hamlet of Thiells built for the physically and mentally disabled of all ages, from the newborn to the elderly. Opened in 1911, Letchworth Village at its peak consisted of over 130 buildings spread out over many acres of land. It was named for William Pryor Letchworth, who espoused reform in the treatment and care of the insane, epileptics, and poor children.

This disability rights timeline lists events relating to the civil rights of people with disabilities in the United States of America, including court decisions, the passage of legislation, activists' actions, significant abuses of people with disabilities, and the founding of various organizations. Although the disability rights movement itself began in the 1960s, advocacy for the rights of people with disabilities started much earlier and continues to the present.

Community integration, while diversely defined, is a term encompassing the full participation of all people in community life. It has specifically referred to the integration of people with disabilities into US society from the local to the national level, and for decades was a defining agenda in countries such as Great Britain. Throughout recent decades, community integration programs have been increasingly effective in improving healthcare access for people with disabilities. They have been valued for providing a "voice for the voiceless"

Family support is the support of families with a member with a disability, which may include a child, an adult, or even the parent in the family. In the United States, family support includes "unpaid" or "informal" support by neighbors, families, and friends, "paid services" through specialist agencies providing an array of services termed "family support services", school or parent services for special needs such as respite care, specialized child care or peer companions, or cash subsidies, tax deductions or other financial subsidies. Family support has been extended to different population groups in the US and worldwide. Family support services are currently a "community services and funding" stream in New York and the US which has had variable "application" based on disability groups, administrating agencies, and even, regulatory and legislative intent.

Disability in China is common, and according to the United Nations, approximately 83 million people in China are estimated to have a disability.

The United States has experienced two waves of deinstitutionalization, the process of replacing long-stay psychiatric hospitals with less isolated community mental health services for those diagnosed with a mental disorder or developmental disability.

References

Citations

  1. Bronston 2004 , pp. 1–2, 4
  2. Bronston 2004 , p. 1; Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 37
  3. 1 2 Nisbet 2021 , p. 39
  4. Bronston 2004 , p. 4
  5. Bronston 2004 , p. 11
  6. Bronston 2004 , p. 6
  7. Bronston 2004 , pp. 9, 12–14
  8. Bronston 2004 , p. 14; Mullan 2006 , p. 52
  9. Bronston 2004 , pp. 14, 16; Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 34
  10. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 34
  11. Backmann 1992 , p. 3; Bronston 2004 , pp. 32, 35
  12. 1 2 Chowkwanyun 2018 , p. 181; Chowkwanyun & Howell 2019 , p. 1871
  13. 1 2 Chowkwanyun & Howell 2019 , p. 1871; Mullan 2006 , p. 53; Rogers 2001 , p. 5
  14. Chowkwanyun 2018 , pp. 181–182; Chowkwanyun & Howell 2019 , p. 1871
  15. Mullan 2006 , p. 52
  16. Chowkwanyun 2018 , pp. 181–183; Chowkwanyun & Howell 2019 , p. 1871
  17. Rogers 2001 , p. 7
  18. Bronston 2004 , p. 32; Carter 1968 , p. 162
  19. Bronston 2004 , p. 39
  20. Bronston 2004 , p. 43; Nisbet 2021 , p. 39
  21. Bronston 2004 , p. 44
  22. Carter 1968 , p. 162; Rogers 2001 , p. 19; Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 34
  23. Carter 1968 , p. 162; Pelka 2012 , p. 174
  24. Nisbet 2021 , p. 39; Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 34
  25. Pelka 2012 , p. 174; Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 34
  26. Rogers 2001 , p. 19; Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 34–35
  27. 1 2 3 Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 35
  28. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 35, 38
  29. 1 2 3 Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 36
  30. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 36–37
  31. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 38–40
  32. 1 2 3 Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 41
  33. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 22, 41–42
  34. 1 2 Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 42
  35. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 42–43
  36. 1 2 Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 43
  37. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 16, 43–44
  38. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 44
  39. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 44–46
  40. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 47, 76
  41. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 1, 50
  42. 1 2 Rothman & Rothman 1984 , p. 76
  43. Rothman & Rothman 1984 , pp. 76–78
  44. Rogers 2001 , p. 19
  45. Bronston 2004 , pp. 139–140
  46. Nisbet 2021 , pp. 49–53
  47. Nisbet 2021 , p. 53
  48. Backmann 1992 , p. 3
  49. Japenga 1985 , p. 21

Books

Journals and magazines

Archives

News articles