Work intensity

Last updated

Work intensity is defined as activity in relation to the capacity for that work. [1] It is a topic that affects developed and developing countries in different ways. There are many aspects to work intensity including multitasking, time poverty, health implications, and policy considerations. Multitasking is the overlap of many activities, usually care and informal work, that negatively impacts the livelihood of people, especially women, in the developing world. [2] Time poverty is defined as the lack of time for leisure and rest activities after time spent working. [3] High work intensity coupled with multitasking and time poverty has a negative correlation with health outcomes. [4] Work intensity is seldom considered when proposing new policy and legislation. As more women enter the workforce, work intensity and its implications are being brought to the forefront of policy, development, and empowerment debates.

Contents

Multitasking

Due to the nature of work intensity and multitasking, women tend to be more affected than men. [3] Work intensity is amplified by multitasking as women put forth more effort per unit of time through the performance of two or more tasks simultaneously. [5] Women assume productive, reproductive, and managing roles in their communities, thus the demand for their time is greater. [5] Each role requires a different amount of intensity, and the magnitude of the amount of work that women in the developing world complete is often disregarded. Current time use data and research ignores the multiplicity of roles and duties performed by women in developing nations, thus, the extent in which women multitask is vastly underreported. [6] This creates an unfair distribution of work between men and women as women chiefly deal with the functioning of the familial unit. [7]

While multitasking and its effects influence all socioeconomic classes, the lower, working classes tend to bear the burden of its distresses. [4] Multitasking, more often than not, is used to mitigate the effects of low incomes. [8] Families that cannot afford other means to take care of the daily ins and outs of running a household rely on women to complete everyday chores and care. In addition, families suffering from poverty are more likely to have both parents work, compounding the amount of labor done by women. [9] However, the alternative to multitasking can leave women and their families in deeper poverty. [3]

Economists are beginning to take note of the importance of correctly quantifying multitasking by looking at the role of care and unpaid work. [10] Care work, done predominantly by women, is a main component of multitasking. [9] Care work includes, but is not limited to, caring for children, the elderly, partners, and oneself. Unpaid work, while it includes care work, also includes activities such as cooking, cleaning, and fetching water. [11] There is an enormous overlap between childcare and multitasking, leading to a never ending workday for many women. If employed, she returns from her job and is again put to work cooking, cleaning, and caring for others in her household. Women complete over sixty percent of unpaid household work, which is almost never factored into any productive measure and overlooked. [12]

Time poverty

Time poverty is defined as the lack of time for leisure and rest activities after time spent working. [3] As women often serve productive, reproductive, and managing roles in their communities they are more likely to be time poor than men as their time is spread out over many activities. [5] Especially in rural areas, women tend to work more hours than men although the time work gap varies by country. [13] Additionally, there is a correlation between time and income poverty which further widens the time and income gap between men and women. [14] It is the combination of informal domestic work on top of market labor that puts women at a disadvantage. [15] Unfortunately, the alternative to being time poor is even deeper consumption poverty. [3] This grim alternative leaves women with no other choice than to be incessantly working, often on several projects at once (internal link to multitasking). Time poverty and multitasking are extremely interconnected in that women are so time impoverished that they must do many tasks simultaneously. In household units, women are more likely to make sacrifices for the rest of the family. In sacrificing their time for more work, women are less healthy, poorly rested, and have diminished capabilities.

The feminization of labor can be seen as partly responsible for the time impoverishment of women in developing countries. Joining the formal labor market means that women have more work to do in addition to the informal care work already done within the home. As women are often paid lower wages than men, the feminization of labor contributes to income inequality and thus general gender inequality. [16] This leaves women with few options: find gainful employment and thus increase bargaining power [17] while at the same time becoming more time poor, or slide further into consumption poverty.

This lack of leisure time reduces the capabilities of women who are time poor. One of the ten essential human capabilities Martha Nussbaum lists in her 2004 article on women's capabilities is play, which is the capability to enjoy life and all that it has to offer. [18] Women who are time poor are severely deficient in the play capability. As development policy slowly transitions from an income-based approach to one that is capability-based, the reduction of capabilities in time impoverished women becomes increasingly important.

Health implications

Because of the time and workload associated with work intensity, there is a negative correlation between work intensity and health. [19] While these health patterns occur in the developing and developed worlds, they manifest differently. An increase in work hours and multitasking may lead to higher monetary income and completed household tasks (for example, meals are cooked, clothes are washed, children are cared for), however the way in which women workers spend their time can lead to a deterioration in health due to stress, chronic fatigue, and a lack of recreation and sleep. [20] In addition, working long hours in agriculture and in factories can cause nutritional deficiencies and physical strain. [21] Lower classes tend to bear the burden of the negative health implications associated with work intensity, and they are more likely to take undesirable jobs that cause said health problems. In addition, lower class women generally take on higher degrees of work intensity. [22]

The capabilities approach emphasizes nutrition and health as fundamental freedoms, as do many other developmental goals and approaches freedom. [23] Health and bodily integrity are essential human capabilities vital to living a full life. A lack of health, especially unnecessarily, can be seen as an infringement on human rights. [18]

Work intensity coupled with rest has been proven beneficial in regards to health outcomes. [24] Rest is a form of productive consumption. Productive consumption enables the satisfaction of current needs and simultaneously increases the productive potential of labor. [25] Rest, improved nutrition, and education can help ease the problems associated with work intensity.

Policy considerations

Of the poverty eradication policies currently in place, very few of them incorporate work intensity into their reduction strategies and can often actually worsen conditions for citizens of developing countries. [21] A common development strategy is to increase the size of a plot of land used for agriculture. While this increases a family's output, it also increases the amount of work women have to do. [21] Another example would be moving a water source closer to a village. While women spend less time collecting water, their free time is rarely allocated to leisure and is instead allocated to more work that can often be more strenuous than the initial task of water collecting. [26] The two development projects listed above are common in developing countries, however neither takes time poverty nor multitasking into account. A potential solution to these two problems is to include improved nutritional programs when work intensity increases. [1] This way, women aren't forced to choose between more work and more food as the nutrition program will be improved as work intensity increases. Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen lists adequate nutrition as an essential human freedom, [23] and at the moment women are spending more time working that receiving sufficient nutrition and rest.

Another potential policy solution is to include rest into the workday as a form of productive consumption. [25] Many economists want to tangibly see the reallocation of work after a certain labor-saving technology has been incorporated. However, individuals need time to recover and thus rest is as important as physical work. A big issue facing policymakers is the inadequacy of the way gender equality and time use are currently measured. Two current methods to quantify gender equality are the Gender-related Development Index (GDI) and the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM). Although each index takes different factors into account, neither addresses time poverty or work intensity. Better economic measures to quantify care and informal work are necessary for more effective policy implementation.

Notes

  1. 1 2 Jackson, Cecile and Richard Palmer-Jones. "Work Intensity, Gender and Well-being." United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) 96 (1998): 14
  2. Floro, Maria Sagrario (1995). "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity". Feminist Economics. 1 (3): 1–25. doi:10.1080/714042246.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Bardasi, Elena; Wodon, Quentin (2010). "Working long hours and having no choice: time poverty in Guinea" (PDF). Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 45. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.508574. hdl: 10986/4156 . S2CID   216644956.
  4. 1 2 Jackson, Cecile and Richard Palmer-Jones. "Work Intensity, Gender and Well-being." United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) 96 (1998): 18
  5. 1 2 3 Floro, Maria Sagrario (1995). "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity". Feminist Economics. 1 (3): 2. doi:10.1080/714042246.
  6. Floro, Maria Sagrario (1995). "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity". Feminist Economics. 1 (3): 5. doi:10.1080/714042246.
  7. Floro, Maria Sagrario (1995). "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity". Feminist Economics. 1 (3): 1–5. doi:10.1080/714042246.
  8. Floro, Maria Sagrario (1995). "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity". Feminist Economics. 1 (3): 18. doi:10.1080/714042246.
  9. 1 2 Floro, Maria Sagrario (1995). "Women's well-being, poverty, and work intensity". Feminist Economics. 1 (3): 8. doi:10.1080/714042246.
  10. Braunstein, Elissa; van Staveren, Irene; Tavani, Daniele (2011). "Embedding care and unpaid work in macroeconomic modeling: a structuralist approach". Feminist Economics. 17 (4): 5–31. doi:10.1080/13545701.2011.602354. hdl: 1765/32966 . S2CID   52263410.
  11. Chen, Martha, Joann Vanek, Francie Lund, James Heintz with Renana Jhabvala, and Christine Bonner. 2005. “The Totality of Women’s Work,” in Progress of the World’s Women, pp. 22–35. New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women
  12. Gammage, Sarah (2010). "Time pressed and time poor: unpaid household work in Guatemala". Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 107. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.498571. S2CID   154932871.
  13. Chang, Hongqin; MacPhail, Fiona; Dong, Xiao-yuan (2010). "The feminization of labour and the time-use gender gap in rural China". Feminist Economics. 17 (4): 93–124. doi:10.1080/13545701.2011.604621. S2CID   154986461.
  14. Gammage, Sarah (2010). "Time pressed and time poor: unpaid household work in Guatemala". Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 79. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.498571. S2CID   154932871.
  15. Bardasi, Elena; Wodon, Quentin (2010). "Working long hours and having no choice: time poverty in Guinea" (PDF). Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 46. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.508574. hdl: 10986/4156 . S2CID   216644956.
  16. Standing, Guy (March 1999). "Global feminization through flexible labor: a theme revisited". World Development. 27 (3): 593. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00151-X.
  17. Agarwal, Bina (1999). "Gender and command over property: a critical gap in economic analysis and policy in South Asia". World Development. 22 (10): 1455–1478. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)90031-0.
  18. 1 2 Nussbaum, Martha (2004), "Promoting women's capabilities", in Benería, Lourdes; Bisnath, Savitri (eds.), Global tensions: challenges and opportunities in the world economy, New York: Routledge, pp. 200–214, ISBN   9780415934411
  19. Jackson, Cecile and Richard Palmer-Jones. "Work Intensity, Gender and Well-being." United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) 96 (1998): i-28
  20. Floro, Maria Sagrario; Pichetpongsa, Anant (2010). "Gender, work intensity, and well-being of Thai home-based workers". Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 8. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.499657. S2CID   154277203.
  21. 1 2 3 Jackson, Cecile and Richard Palmer-Jones. "Work Intensity, Gender and Well-being." United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) 96 (1998): ii
  22. Floro, Maria Sagrario; Pichetpongsa, Anant (2010). "Gender, work intensity, and well-being of Thai home-based workers". Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 31. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.499657. S2CID   154277203.
  23. 1 2 Sen, Amartya (1999), "The perspective of freedom", in Sen, Amartya (ed.), Development as freedom (1st ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, p. 15, ISBN   9780198297581
  24. Gammage, Sarah (2010). "Time pressed and time poor: unpaid household work in Guatemala". Feminist Economics. 16 (3): 83. doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.498571. S2CID   154932871.
  25. 1 2 Jackson, Cecile and Richard Palmer-Jones. "Work Intensity, Gender and Well-being." United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) 96 (1998): iii
  26. Jackson, Cecile and Richard Palmer-Jones. "Work Intensity, Gender and Well-being." United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) 96 (1998): 26

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminist economics</span> Gender-aware branch of economics

Feminist economics is the critical study of economics and economies, with a focus on gender-aware and inclusive economic inquiry and policy analysis. Feminist economic researchers include academics, activists, policy theorists, and practitioners. Much feminist economic research focuses on topics that have been neglected in the field, such as care work, intimate partner violence, or on economic theories which could be improved through better incorporation of gendered effects and interactions, such as between paid and unpaid sectors of economies. Other feminist scholars have engaged in new forms of data collection and measurement such as the Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), and more gender-aware theories such as the capabilities approach. Feminist economics is oriented towards the goal of "enhancing the well-being of children, women, and men in local, national, and transnational communities."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parental leave</span> Time taken off to care for a new child

Parental leave, or family leave, is an employee benefit available in almost all countries. The term "parental leave" may include maternity, paternity, and adoption leave; or may be used distinctively from "maternity leave" and "paternity leave" to describe separate family leave available to either parent to care for small children. In some countries and jurisdictions, "family leave" also includes leave provided to care for ill family members. Often, the minimum benefits and eligibility requirements are stipulated by law.

Marxist feminism is a philosophical variant of feminism that incorporates and extends Marxist theory. Marxist feminism analyzes the ways in which women are exploited through capitalism and the individual ownership of private property. According to Marxist feminists, women's liberation can only be achieved by dismantling the capitalist systems in which they contend much of women's labor is uncompensated. Marxist feminists extend traditional Marxist analysis by applying it to unpaid domestic labor and sex relations.

Feminization of poverty refers to a trend of increasing inequality in living standards between men and women due to the widening gender gap in poverty. This phenomenon largely links to how women and children are disproportionately represented within the lower socioeconomic status community in comparison to men within the same socioeconomic status. Causes of the feminization of poverty include the structure of family and household, employment, sexual violence, education, climate change, "femonomics" and health. The traditional stereotypes of women remain embedded in many cultures restricting income opportunities and community involvement for many women. Matched with a low foundation income, this can manifest to a cycle of poverty and thus an inter-generational issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Double burden</span> Workload of people who both earn money and have significant domestic responsibilities

A double burden is the workload of people who work to earn money, but who are also responsible for significant amounts of unpaid domestic labor. This phenomenon is also known as the Second Shift as in Arlie Hochschild's book of the same name. In couples where both partners have paid jobs, women often spend significantly more time than men on household chores and caring work, such as childrearing or caring for sick family members. This outcome is determined in large part by traditional gender roles that have been accepted by society over time. Labor market constraints also play a role in determining who does the bulk of unpaid work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capability approach</span> Normative approach to human welfare

The capability approach is a normative approach to human welfare that concentrates on the actual capability of persons to achieve lives they value rather than solely having a right or freedom to do so. It was conceived in the 1980s as an alternative approach to welfare economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bina Agarwal</span> Indian development economist

Bina Agarwal is an Indian development economist and Professor of Development Economics and Environment at the Global Development Institute at The University of Manchester. She has written extensively on land, livelihoods and property rights; environment and development; the political economy of gender; poverty and inequality; legal change; and agriculture and technological transformation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unpaid work</span> Labor that does not receive any direct remuneration

Unpaid labor or unpaid work is defined as labor or work that does not receive any direct remuneration. This is a form of non-market work which can fall into one of two categories: (1) unpaid work that is placed within the production boundary of the System of National Accounts (SNA), such as gross domestic product (GDP); and (2) unpaid work that falls outside of the production boundary, such as domestic labor that occurs inside households for their consumption. Unpaid labor is visible in many forms and isn't limited to activities within a household. Other types of unpaid labor activities include volunteering as a form of charity work and interning as a form of unpaid employment. In a lot of countries, unpaid domestic work in the household is typically performed by women, due to gender inequality and gender norms, which can result in high-stress levels in women attempting to balance unpaid work and paid employment. In poorer countries, this work is sometimes performed by children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Care work</span> Type of employment based on affection rather than immediate pecuniary reward

Care work is a sub-category of work that includes all tasks that directly involve the care processes done in service of others. It is often differentiated from other forms of work because it is considered to be intrinsically motivated. This perspective defines care labor as labor done out of affection or a sense of responsibility for other people, with no expectation of immediate pecuniary reward. Regardless of motivation, care work includes care activities done for pay as well as those done without remuneration.

<i>If Women Counted</i> 1988 book by Marilyn Waring

If Women Counted (1988) is a book by New Zealand academic and former politician Marilyn Waring, that is regarded as the "founding document" of the discipline of feminist economics. The book is a groundbreaking and systematic critique of the system of national accounts, the international standard of measuring economic growth, and the ways in which women's unpaid work as well as the value of Nature have been excluded from what counts as productive in the economy.

Gender and development is an interdisciplinary field of research and applied study that implements a feminist approach to understanding and addressing the disparate impact that economic development and globalization have on people based upon their location, gender, class background, and other socio-political identities. A strictly economic approach to development views a country's development in quantitative terms such as job creation, inflation control, and high employment – all of which aim to improve the ‘economic wellbeing’ of a country and the subsequent quality of life for its people. In terms of economic development, quality of life is defined as access to necessary rights and resources including but not limited to quality education, medical facilities, affordable housing, clean environments, and low crime rate. Gender and development considers many of these same factors; however, gender and development emphasizes efforts towards understanding how multifaceted these issues are in the entangled context of culture, government, and globalization. Accounting for this need, gender and development implements ethnographic research, research that studies a specific culture or group of people by physically immersing the researcher into the environment and daily routine of those being studied, in order to comprehensively understand how development policy and practices affect the everyday life of targeted groups or areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ailsa McKay</span> 20th and 21st-century Scottish economist

Ailsa McKay was a Scottish economist, government policy adviser, a leading feminist economist and Professor of Economics at Glasgow Caledonian University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender and food security</span>

Gender inequality both leads to and is a result of food insecurity. According to estimates, women and girls make up 60% of the world's chronically hungry and little progress has been made in ensuring the equal right to food for women enshrined in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Women face discrimination both in education and employment opportunities and within the household, where their bargaining power is lower. On the other hand, gender equality is described as instrumental to ending malnutrition and hunger. Women tend to be responsible for food preparation and childcare within the family and are more likely to be spent their income on food and their children's needs. The gendered aspects of food security are visible along the four pillars of food security: availability, access, utilization and stability, as defined by the Food and Agriculture Organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Ecuador</span> Overview of the status of women in Ecuador

Women in Ecuador are generally responsible for the upbringing and care of children and families; traditionally, men have not taken an active role. Ever more women have been joining the workforce, which has resulted in men doing some housework, and becoming more involved in the care of their children. This change has been greatly influenced by Eloy Alfaro's liberal revolution in 1906, in which Ecuadorian women were granted the right to work. Women's suffrage was granted in 1929.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender inequality in Mexico</span> Overview of gender inequality in Mexico

Gender inequality in Mexico refers to disparate freedoms in health, education, and economic and political abilities between men and women in Mexico. It has been diminishing throughout history, but continues to persist in many forms including the disparity in women's political representation and participation, the gender pay gap, and high rates of domestic violence and femicide. As of 2022, the World Economic Forum ranks Mexico 31st in terms of gender equality out of 146 countries. Structural gender inequality is relatively homogeneous between the Mexican states as there are very few regional differences in the inequalities present.

Naila Kabeer is an Indian-born British Bangladeshi social economist, research fellow, writer and Professor at the London School of Economics. She was also president of the International Association for Feminist Economics (IAFFE) from 2018 to 2019. She is on the editorial committee of journals such as Feminist Economist, Development and Change, Gender and Development, Third World Quarterly and the Canadian Journal of Development Studies. She works primarily on poverty, gender and social policy issues. Her research interests include gender, poverty, social exclusion, labour markets and livelihoods, social protection, focused on South and South East Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephanie Seguino</span> American economist

Stephanie Seguino is a feminist professor of economics at the University of Vermont in Burlington, Vermont, United States. She was the president of the International Association for Feminist Economics from 2010 to 2011 and has also carried out research for both the United Nations and the World Bank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yana van der Meulen Rodgers</span> Dutch feminist economist

Yana van der Meulen Rodgers is a professor in the Department of Labor Studies and Employment Relations in the School of Management and Labor Relations at Rutgers University,. She also serves as Faculty Director of the Center for Women and Work at Rutgers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reproductive labor</span> Type of domestic labor

Reproductive labor or work is often associated with care giving and domestic housework roles including cleaning, cooking, child care, and the unpaid domestic labor force. The term has taken on a role in feminist philosophy and discourse as a way of calling attention to how women in particular are assigned to the domestic sphere, where the labor is reproductive and thus uncompensated and unrecognized in a capitalist system. These theories have evolved as a parallel of histories focusing on the entrance of women into the labor force in the 1970s, providing an intersectionalist approach that recognizes that women have been a part of the labor force since before their incorporation into mainstream industry if reproductive labor is considered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shahra Razavi</span>

Shahra Razavi is an Iranian-born academic and senior United Nations official specialising in gender and social development. A graduate of the London School of Economics and Oxford University, Razavi is currently Director of the Social Protection Department of the International Labour Organisation in Geneva, Switzerland.