Army ant

Last updated
African Dorylus raid Safari ants tunnel.jpg
African Dorylus raid

The name army ant (or legionary ant or marabunta [1] ) is applied to over 200 ant species in different lineages. Because of their aggressive predatory foraging groups, known as "raids", a huge number of ants forage simultaneously over a limited area. [2]

Contents

Another shared feature is that, unlike most ant species, army ants do not construct permanent nests; an army ant colony moves almost incessantly over the time it exists. All species are members of the true ant family, Formicidae, but several groups have independently evolved the same basic behavioural and ecological syndrome. This syndrome is often referred to as "legionary behaviour", and may be an example of convergent evolution. [3] [n 1]

Most New World army ants belong to the genera Cheliomyrmex , Neivamyrmex , Nomamyrmex , Labidus , and Eciton . [3] The largest genus is Neivamyrmex, which contains more than 120 species; the most predominant species is Eciton burchellii ; its common name "army ant" is considered to be the archetype of the species. Most Old World army ants are divided between the tribes Aenictini and Dorylini. Aenictini contains more than 50 species of army ants in the single genus, Aenictus . However, the Dorylini contain the genus Dorylus , the most aggressive group of driver ants; 70 species are known.[ citation needed ]

Originally, some of the Old World and New World lineages of army ants were thought to have evolved independently, in an example of convergent evolution. In 2003, though, genetic analysis of various species suggests that several of these groups evolved from a single common ancestor, which lived approximately 100 million years ago at the time of the separation of the continents of Africa and South America, while other army ant lineages (Leptanillinae, plus members of Ponerinae, Amblyoponinae, and Myrmicinae) are still considered to represent independent evolutionary events. [3] Army ant taxonomy remains in flux, and genetic analysis will likely continue to provide more information about the relatedness of the various taxa. [4]

Morphology

An Eciton burchellii soldier guarding workers Eciton burchellii army ants.jpg
An Eciton burchellii soldier guarding workers

Workers

The workers of army ants are usually blind or can have compound eyes that are reduced to a single lens. There are species of army ants where the worker caste may show polymorphism based on physical differences and job allocations; however, there are also species that show no polymorphism at all. [5] The worker caste is usually composed of sterile female worker ants. [6]

Soldiers

The soldiers of army ants are larger than the workers, and they have much larger mandibles than the worker class of ants, with older soldiers possessing larger heads and stronger mandibles than the younger ones. They protect the colony, and help carry the heaviest loads of prey to the colony bivouac.

Males

Males are large in size and have a large cylindrical abdomen, highly modified mandibles and uncommon genitalia not seen in other ants. [7] They have 13 segments on their antennae, are alated (have wings) and therefore can resemble wasps. [5] Males are born as part of a sexual brood. [7] As soon as they are born, they will fly off in search of a queen to mate with. In some instances where males seek to mate with a queen from an existing colony, the receiving workers will forcibly remove the wings in order to accommodate the large males into the colony for mating. [8] Because of their size, males are sometimes called "sausage flies" or "sausage ants." [9]

Queen

Colonies of real army ants always have only one queen, while some other ant species can have several queens. The queen is dichthadiigyne (a blind ant with large gaster) but may sometimes possess vestigial eyes. [5] The queens of army ants are unique in that they do not have wings, have an enlarged gaster size and an extended cylindrical abdomen. [8] They are significantly larger than worker army ants and possess 10–12 segments on their antennae. [5] Queens will mate with multiple males and because of their enlarged gaster, can produce 3 to 4 million eggs a month, resulting in synchronized brood cycles and colonies composed of millions of individuals all related to a single queen. [5] [10]

Behaviour

E. vagans with larvae of a raided wasp nest Flickr - ggallice - Spoils of the raid.jpg
E. vagans with larvae of a raided wasp nest
Dorylus sp. in Cameroon, consuming a grasshopper Dorylus.JPG
Dorylus sp. in Cameroon, consuming a grasshopper
Safari ants (Dorylus sp.) on a march in Kakamega Forest, Kenya. A column of workers moves under the protection of the soldiers, who link together into a tunnel and display their mandibles to ward off predators Safari Ants - Kakamega-Forest Kenya.jpg
Safari ants (Dorylus sp.) on a march in Kakamega Forest, Kenya. A column of workers moves under the protection of the soldiers, who link together into a tunnel and display their mandibles to ward off predators

Army ant syndrome

The term "army ant syndrome" refers to behavioral and reproductive traits such as obligate collective foraging, nomadism and highly specialized queens that allow these organisms to become the most ferocious social hunters. [3]

Most ant species will send individual scouts to find food sources and later recruit others from the colony to help; however, army ants dispatch a cooperative, leaderless group of foragers to detect and overwhelm the prey at once. [3] [5] Army ants do not have a permanent nest but instead form many bivouacs as they travel. The constant traveling is due to the need to hunt large amounts of prey to feed its enormous colony population. [5] Their queens are wingless and have abdomens that expand significantly during egg production. [8] This allows for the production of 3–4 million eggs every month and often results in synchronized brood cycles, thus each colony will be formed of millions of individuals that descend from a single queen. These three traits are found in all army ant species and are the defining traits of army ants. [3] [11]

Nomadic and stationary phase

Army ants have two phases of activity –a nomadic (wandering) phase and a stationary (statary) phase –that constantly cycle, and can be found throughout all army ant species. [8]

The nomadic phase begins around 10 days after the queen lays her eggs. This phase will last approximately 15 days to let the larvae develop. The ants move during the day, capturing insects, spiders, and small vertebrates to feed their brood. At dusk, they will form their nests or bivouac, which they change almost daily. [8] At the end of the nomadic phase, the larvae will spin pupal cases and no longer require food. The colony can then live in the same bivouac site for around 20 days, foraging only on approximately two-thirds of these days. [2] [8] This pattern of diurnal activity does not apply to all army ants: there are also species that forage at night (nocturnal) or at both day and night (cathemeral). [12]

The stationary phase, which lasts about two to three weeks, begins when the larvae pupate. From this point on, the prey that were previously fed to the larvae are now fed exclusively to the queen. [8] The abdomen (gaster) of the queen swells significantly, and she lays her eggs. At the end of the stationary phase, both the pupae emerge from their cocoons (eclosion) and the next generation of eggs hatch so the colony has a new group of workers and larvae. After this, the ants resume the nomadic phase. [5] [8]

Behaviour and organization of a bivouac Army ant Eciton Burchelli.svg
Behaviour and organization of a bivouac

Colony fission

Army ants will split into groups when the size of the colony has reached a size threshold, which happens approximately every three years. [13] Wingless virgin queens will hatch among a male sexual brood that hatches at a later date. When the colony fissions, there are two ways new queens are decided. A possible outcome is a new queen will stay at the original nest with a portion of the workers and the male brood while the old queen will leave with the rest of the workers and find a new nest. Another possibility is that the workers will reject the old queen and new queens will each head a newly-divided colony. [2] [8] The workers will affiliate with individual queens based on the pheromone cues that are unique to each queen. When new bivouacs are formed, communication between the original colony and the new bivouacs will cease. [8]

Queen behaviour

Being the largest ants on Earth, army ants, such as African Dorylus queens have the greatest reproductive potential among insects, with an egg-laying capacity of several million per month. Army ant queens never have to leave the protection of the colony, where they mate with foreign incoming males which disperse on nuptial flights. The exact mating behaviour of the army ant queen is still unknown, but observations seem to imply that queens may be fertilized by multiple males. [14] Due to the queen's large reproductive potential, a colony of army ants can be descended from a single queen. [10]

When the queen ant dies, there is no replacement and army ants cannot rear emergency queens. Most of the time, if the queen dies, the colony will likely die too. Queen loss can occur due to accidents during emigrations, predator attack, old age or illness. [13] However, there are possibilities to avoid colony death. When a colony loses its queen, the worker ants will usually fuse with another colony that has a queen, within a few days. [6] [15] Sometimes, the workers will backtrack along the paths of prior emigrations to search for a queen that has been lost or merge with a sister colony. [15] [16] By merging with a related colony, the workers would increase their overall inclusive fitness. [13] The workers that merge into a new colony may cause the colony to increase in size by 50%.

Sexual selection by workers

Workers in army ant species have a unique role in selecting both the queen and the male mate.

When the queens emerge, the workers in the colony will form two 'systems' or arms in opposite directions. These queens that are hatched will move down either of the arms and only two queens will succeed, one for each branch. Any remaining new queens will be left in the middle and are abandoned. Two new bivouacs will be formed and break off into different directions. The workers will surround the two to-be queens to ensure they survive. These workers that surround the queens are affected by the CHC (pheromone) profile emitted by the new queen. [8]

When males hatch from their brood, they will fly off to find a mate. For males to access the queen and mate, they must run through the workers in the colony. Males that are favoured are superficially similar in size and shape to the queen. The males also produce large quantities of pheromones to pacify the worker ants. [8]

Reproduction responsibilities and problems

In a colony, the queen is the primary individual responsible for reproduction in the colony. Analysis of genotypes have confirmed that workers are, on average, more closely related to the offspring of the queen than to that of other workers, and that workers rarely, if ever, reproduce. [17] Three factors have been suggested to rationalize the loss of worker reproduction in the presence of a queen. First, if the worker reproduces, it lowers the general performance of the colony because it is not working. Second, workers increase their inclusive fitness by policing other workers because they themselves are more related to the queen's offspring than other worker's offspring. [17] Lastly, the large male larvae become too large to be transported, forcing colonies with a sexual brood to nest for a period of 41–56 days, as compared to non-reproductive colonies that remain in the nest an average of 17 days before returning to a nomadic phase. This suggests that if workers produced male offspring, they might be hatched out of sync with the queen's sexual brood and not likely to be successfully reared to adulthood. [17]

Ant mills

Army ants can get lost from the pheromone track while foraging, making the ants follow each other in a circular motion, potentially causing them to die of exhaustion. [18]

Foraging

The whole colony of army ants can consume up to 500,000 prey animals each day, so can have a significant influence on the population, diversity, and behaviour of their prey. [19] The prey selection differs with the species. Underground species prey primarily on ground-dwelling arthropods and their larvae, earthworms, and occasionally also the young of vertebrates, turtle eggs, or oily seeds. A majority of the species, the "colony robbers", specialize in the offspring of other ants and wasps. Only a few species seem to have the very broad spectrum of prey seen in the raiding species. Even these species do not eat every kind of animal. Although small vertebrates that get caught in the raid will be killed, the jaws of the American Eciton are not suited to this type of prey, in contrast to the African Dorylus . These undesired prey are simply left behind and consumed by scavengers or by the flies that accompany the ant swarm. Only a few species hunt primarily on the surface of the earth; they seek their prey mainly in leaf litter and in low vegetation. About five species hunt in higher trees, where they can attack birds and their eggs, although they focus on hunting other social insects along with their eggs and larvae. Colonies of army ants are large compared to the colonies of other Formicidae. Colonies can have over 15 million workers and can transport 3000 prey (items) per hour during the raid period. [14] [20]

When army ants forage, the trails that are formed can be over 20 m (66 ft) wide and over 100 m (330 ft) long. [20] They stay on the path through the use of a concentration gradient of pheromones. The concentration of pheromone is highest in the middle of the trail, splitting the trail into two distinct regions: an area with high concentration and two areas with low concentrations of pheromones. The outbound ants will occupy the outer two lanes and the returning ants will occupy the central lane. [20] The returning worker ants have also been found to emit more pheromones than those leaving the nest, causing the difference in concentration of pheromone in the trails. [21] The pheromones will allow foraging to be much more efficient by allowing the army ants to avoid their own former paths and those of their conspecifics. [19] Scaffolds structure has been observed when workers carried heavy prey food to inclined surface. Walking ants are prevented from falling by other ants. [22]

While foraging, army ants cause many invertebrates to flee from their hiding places under leaves of the forest floor, under tree bark, and other such locations, thereby allowing predators to catch them more easily. For example, in the tropical rainforests of Panama, swarms of army ants attract many species of birds to this feast of scrambling insects, spiders, scorpions, worms, and other animals. Some of these birds are named "antbirds" due to this tendency. [23] While focused on feeding on these invertebrates, birds at army-ant swarms typically allow very close approach by people –within 1–2 metres (3.3–6.6 ft) in many cases –often providing the best opportunities to see many of these species. Depending on the size of the ant swarm and the amount of prey the ants stir up, birds can number from a few to dozens of individuals. Birds that frequent army-ant swarms include the white-whiskered puffbird, rufous motmot, rufous-vented ground cuckoo, grey-cowled wood rail, plain-brown woodcreeper, northern barred woodcreeper, cocoa woodcreeper, black-striped woodcreeper, fasciated antshrike, black-crowned antshrike, spotted antbird, bicolored antbird, ocellated antbird, chestnut-backed antbird, black-faced antthrush, and gray-headed tanager. [24]

Nesting

Eciton sp. forming a bridge Ant bridge.jpg
Eciton sp. forming a bridge

Army ants do not build a nest like most other ants. Instead, they build a living nest with their bodies, known as a bivouac. Bivouacs tend to be found in tree trunks or in burrows dug by the ants. The members of the bivouac hold onto each other's legs and so build a sort of ball, which may look unstructured to a layman's eyes, but is actually a well-organized structure. [25] The older female workers are located on the exterior; in the interior are the younger female workers. At the smallest disturbance, soldiers gather on the top surface of the bivouac, ready to defend the nest with powerful mandibles and (in the case of the Aenictinae and Ecitoninae) stingers. Inside the nest, there are numerous passages that have 'chambers' of food, larvae, eggs, and most importantly, the queen. [26]

Symbionts

Many species of army ants are widely considered to be keystone species [27] due to their important ecological role as arthropod predators [28] and due to their large number of vertebrate and invertebrate associates that rely on army ant colonies for nutrition or protection. [29] [30] [31] During their hunt, many surface-raiding army ants are accompanied by various birds, such as antbirds, thrushes, ovenbirds and wrens, which devour the insects that are flushed out by the ants, a behavior known as kleptoparasitism. [32] [33] A wide variety of arthropods including staphylinid beetles, histerid beetles, spiders, silverfish, isopods, and mites also follow colonies. [34] While some guests follow the colony emigrations on foot, [35] [36] [31] many others are phoretically transported, for example by attaching themselves on army ant workers such as the histerid beetle Nymphister kronaueri . [37] The Neotropical army ant Eciton burchellii has an estimated 350 to 500 animal associates, the most of any one species known to science. [31]

It has been speculated that the nocturnal foraging of some army ant species is done to reduce kleptoparasitism by birds, since the bird kleptoparasites of army ants are diurnal. [12]

Taxonomy

Historically, "army ant" in the broad sense referred to various members of five different ant subfamilies. In two of these cases, the Ponerinae and Myrmicinae, only a few species and genera exhibit legionary behavior; in the other three lineages, Ecitoninae, Dorylinae, and Leptanillinae, all of the constituent species were considered to be legionary. More recently, ant classifications now recognize an additional New World subfamily, Leptanilloidinae, which also consists of obligate legionary species, so is another group now included among the army ants. [38]

A 2003 study of thirty species (by Sean Brady of Cornell University) indicates that army ants of subfamilies Ecitoninae (South America), Dorylinae (Africa) and Aenictinae (Asia) together formed a monophyletic group, based on data from three molecular genes and one mitochondrial gene. Brady concluded that these groups are, therefore, a single lineage that evolved in the mid-Cretaceous period in Gondwana, [n 2] so these subfamilies are now generally united into a single subfamily Dorylinae, though this is still not universally recognized. [40] However, the unification of these lineages means that the only subfamily that is composed solely of legionary species is Leptanillinae, as Dorylinae contains many non-legionary genera.

Accordingly, the "army ants" as presently recognized consist of legionary species in these genera:

Subfamily Dorylinae (Aenictinae, Aenictogitoninae, Cerapachyinae, Ecitoninae and Leptanilloidinae, 2014) [41]
Subfamily Leptanillinae
Subfamily Myrmicinae
Subfamily Ponerinae
Subfamily Amblyoponinae

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "There are also interesting [evolutionary] convergences within the ants. Although most ant colonies live a settled existence in a fixed nest, there seems to be a successful living to be made by wandering in enormous pillaging armies. This is called the legionary habit." (Dawkins 1986)
  2. ↑ "Because army ants are found almost everywhere, scientists postulated that they evolved many times after the break-up and dispersal of the supercontinent Gondwana just over 100 million years ago. The conventional view of the evolution of army ants needs a revision because of new data obtained by Sean Brady, a Cornell University, US, entomologist who has discovered that these ants evolved from a common ancestor."(Whitehouse 2003) [39]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ant</span> Family of insects

Ants are eusocial insects of the family Formicidae and, along with the related wasps and bees, belong to the order Hymenoptera. Ants evolved from vespoid wasp ancestors in the Cretaceous period. More than 13,800 of an estimated total of 22,000 species have been classified. They are easily identified by their geniculate (elbowed) antennae and the distinctive node-like structure that forms their slender waists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red harvester ant</span> Species of ant

Pogonomyrmex barbatus is a species of harvester ant from the genus Pogonomyrmex. Its common names include red ant and red harvester ant. These large ants prefer arid chaparral habitats and are native to the Southwestern United States. Nests are made underground in exposed areas. Their diets consist primarily of seeds, and they consequently participate in myrmecochory, an ant-plant interaction through which the ants gain nutrients and the plants benefit through seed dispersal. Red harvester ants are often mistaken for fire ants, but are not closely related to any fire ant species, native or introduced.

<i>Dorylus</i> Driver ants (genus of insects)

Dorylus, also known as driver ants, safari ants, or siafu, is a large genus of army ants found primarily in central and east Africa, although the range also extends to southern Africa and tropical Asia. The term siafu is a loanword from Swahili, and is one of numerous similar words from regional Bantu languages used by indigenous peoples to describe various species of these ants. Unlike the New World members of the former subfamily Ecitoninae, members of this genus form temporary subterranean bivouacs in underground cavities which they excavate and inhabit - either for a few days or up to three months. Also unlike some New World army ants, driver ants are not specialized predators of other species of ant, instead being more generalistic with a diet consisting of a diversity of arthropods. Colonies are enormous compared to other army ants and can contain over 20 million individuals. As with their American counterparts, workers exhibit caste polymorphism with the soldiers having particularly large heads that power their scissor-like mandibles. They are capable of stinging, but very rarely do so, relying instead on their powerful shearing jaws. Driver ant queens are the largest living ants known, with the largest measuring between 40 - 63 millimeters in total body length depending on their physiological condition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pharaoh ant</span> Species of ant

The pharaoh ant is a small (2 mm) yellow or light brown, almost transparent ant notorious for being a major indoor nuisance pest, especially in hospitals. A cryptogenic species, it has now been introduced to virtually every area of the world, including Europe, the Americas, Australasia and Southeast Asia. It is a major pest in the United States, Australia, and Europe. The ant's common name is said to be derived from the mistaken belief that it was one of the biblical Egyptian (pharaonic) plagues.

<i>Bombus terrestris</i> Species of bee

Bombus terrestris, the buff-tailed bumblebee or large earth bumblebee, is one of the most numerous bumblebee species in Europe. It is one of the main species used in greenhouse pollination, and so can be found in many countries and areas where it is not native, such as Tasmania. Moreover, it is a eusocial insect with an overlap of generations, a division of labour, and cooperative brood care. The queen is monogamous which means she mates with only one male. B. terrestris workers learn flower colours and forage efficiently.

<i>Vespula vulgaris</i> Species of insect

Vespula vulgaris, known as the common wasp, is a species found in regions that include the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, India, China, New Zealand and Australia. It is sometimes known in English as the European wasp, but the same name is used for the species Vespula germanica or German wasp. In 2010, the ostensible Vespula vulgaris wasps in North America were found to be a different species, Vespula alascensis.

<i>Eciton burchellii</i> Species of ant

Eciton burchellii is a species of New World army ant in the genus Eciton. This species performs expansive, organized swarm raids that give it the informal name, Eciton army ant. This species displays a high degree of worker polymorphism. Sterile workers are of four discrete size-castes: minors, medias, porters (sub-majors), and soldiers (majors). Soldiers have much larger heads and specialized mandibles for defense. In lieu of underground excavated nests, colonies of E. burchellii form temporary living nests known as bivouacs, which are composed of hanging live worker bodies and which can be disassembled and relocated during colony emigrations. Eciton burchellii colonies cycle between stationary phases and nomadic phases when the colony emigrates nightly. These alternating phases of emigration frequency are governed by coinciding brood developmental stages. Group foraging efforts known as "raids" are maintained by the use of pheromones, can be 200 metres (660 ft) long, and employ up to 200,000 ants. Workers are also adept at making living structures out of their own bodies to improve efficiency of moving as a group across the forest floor while foraging or emigrating. Workers can fill "potholes" in the foraging trail with their own bodies, and can also form living bridges. Numerous antbirds prey on the Eciton burchellii by using their raids as a source of food. In terms of geographical distribution, this species is found in the Amazon jungle and Central America.

<i>Nothomyrmecia</i> Genus of ants

Nothomyrmecia, also known as the dinosaur ant or dawn ant, is an extremely rare genus of ants consisting of a single species, Nothomyrmecia macrops. These ants live in South Australia, nesting in old-growth mallee woodland and Eucalyptus woodland. The full distribution of Nothomyrmecia has never been assessed, and it is unknown how widespread the species truly is; its potential range may be wider if it does favour old-growth mallee woodland. Possible threats to its survival include habitat destruction and climate change. Nothomyrmecia is most active when it is cold because workers encounter fewer competitors and predators such as Camponotus and Iridomyrmex, and it also increases hunting success. Thus, the increase of temperature may prevent them from foraging and very few areas would be suitable for the ant to live in. As a result, the IUCN lists the ant as Critically Endangered.

<i>Eciton</i> Genus of ants

Eciton is a New World army ant genus that contains the most familiar species of army ants. The most predominant and well-known species is Eciton burchellii, which is also more commonly known as the army ant and is considered the type species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuptial flight</span> Mating flight of eusocial insects

Nuptial flight is an important phase in the reproduction of most ant, termite, and some bee species. It is also observed in some fly species, such as Rhamphomyia longicauda.

Myrmecia inquilina is a species of ant endemic to Australia in the subfamily Myrmeciinae, first discovered in 1955 and described by Athol Douglas and William Brown Jr. in 1959. These ants are large, measuring 21.4 millimetres (0.84 in). During the time of its discovery, Douglas and Brown announced M. inquilina as the first social parasite among the primitive subfamilies, and today it is one of the two known Myrmecia species to have no worker caste. Two host species are known, Myrmecia nigriceps and Myrmecia vindex. Aggression between M. inquilina and its host species does not occur, and colonies may only produce M. inquilina brood months after the inquiline queens begin to lay their eggs. Queens eat the colony brood or trophic eggs, and other Myrmecia species may kill M. inquilina queens if they reject them. Due to its restricted distribution and threats to its habitat, the ant is "vulnerable" according to the IUCN Red List.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eusociality</span> Highest level of animal sociality a species can attain

Eusociality is the highest level of organization of sociality. It is defined by the following characteristics: cooperative brood care, overlapping generations within a colony of adults, and a division of labor into reproductive and non-reproductive groups. The division of labor creates specialized behavioral groups within an animal society which are sometimes referred to as 'castes'. Eusociality is distinguished from all other social systems because individuals of at least one caste usually lose the ability to perform behaviors characteristic of individuals in another caste. Eusocial colonies can be viewed as superorganisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eastern yellowjacket</span> Species of insect

The eastern yellow jacket or eastern yellowjacket is a wasp found in eastern North America. Although most of their nests are subterranean, they are often considered a pest due to their nesting in recreational areas and buildings. This yellow jacket is a social insect, living in colonies of hundreds to thousands of individuals. Along with their subfamily, Vespinae, this species demonstrates supportive parental care for offspring, separation of reproductive and sterile castes, and overlapping generations. They aggressively defend their hives from threats and are known to inflict painful stings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green-head ant</span> Species of ant

The green-head ant is a species of ant that is endemic to Australia. It was described by British entomologist Frederick Smith in 1858 as a member of the genus Rhytidoponera in the subfamily Ectatomminae. These ants measure between 5 and 7 mm. The queens and workers look similar, differing only in size, with the males being the smallest. They are well known for their distinctive metallic appearance, which varies from green to purple or even reddish-violet. Among the most widespread of all insects in Australia, green-head ants are found in almost every Australian state, but are absent in Tasmania. They have also been introduced in New Zealand, where several populations have been established.

<i>Leptanilla japonica</i> Species of ant

Leptanilla japonica is an uncommon highly migratory, subterranean ant found in Japan. They are tiny insects, with workers measuring about 1.2 mm and queens reaching to about 1.8 mm, and live in very small colonies of only a few hundred individuals at a time Its sexual development follows a seasonal cycle that affects the colony's migration and feeding habits, and vice versa. L. japonica exhibits specialized predation, with prey consisting mainly of geophilomorph centipedes, a less reliable food source that also contributes to their high rate of nest migration. Like ants of genera Amblyopone and Proceratium, the genus Leptanilla engages in larval hemolymph feeding (LHF), with the queen using no other form of sustenance. LHF is an advantageous alternative to the more costly cannibalism. Unlike any other ant, however, members of Leptanilla, including L. japonica, have evolved a specialized organ dubbed the “larval hemolymph tap” that reduces the damage LHF inflicts on the larvae. LHF has become this species' main form of nutrition.

<i>Polistes exclamans</i> Species of wasp

Polistes exclamans, the Guinea paper wasp, is a social wasp and is part of the family Vespidae of the order Hymenoptera. It is found throughout the United States, Mexico, the Bahamas, Jamaica and parts of Canada. Due to solitary nest founding by queens, P. exclamans has extended its range in the past few decades and now covers the eastern half of the United States, as well as part of the north. This expansion is typically attributed to changing global climate and temperatures. P. exclamans has three specific castes, including males, workers, and queens, but the dominance hierarchy is further distinguished by age. The older the wasp is, the higher it is in ranking within the colony. In most P. exclamans nests, there is one queen who lays all the eggs in the colony. The physiological similarities between the worker and queen castes have led to experiments attempting to distinguish the characteristics of these two castes and how they are determined, though males have easily identifiable physiological characteristics. Since P. exclamans live in relatively small, open combed nests, they are often subject to predators and parasites, such as Chalcoela iphitalis, Elasmus polistis, and birds. P. exclamans have defense and recognition strategies that help protect against these predators and parasites.

<i>Ooceraea biroi</i> Species of ant

Ooceraea biroi, the clonal raider ant, is a queenless clonal ant in the genus Ooceraea. Native to the Asian mainland, this species has become invasive on tropical and subtropical islands throughout the world. Unlike most ants, which have reproductive queens and mostly nonreproductive workers, all individuals in a O. biroi colony reproduce clonally via thelytokous parthenogenesis. Like most dorylines, O. biroi are obligate myrmecophages and raid nests of other ant species to feed on the brood.

<i>Novomessor cockerelli</i> Species of ant

Novomessor cockerelli is a species of ant in the subfamily Myrmicinae. It is native to the deserts of the Southwestern United States and Mexico. It lives in large underground colonies in which there is a single queen. The worker ants leave the nest daily to forage for seeds, plant material and dead insects.

This is a glossary of terms used in the descriptions of ants.

<i>Nymphister kronaueri</i> Species of beetle

Nymphister kronaueri is a species of histerid beetle native to Costa Rica. It was first discovered in 2014. The discovery of the beetle received much media attention due to its unusual habit of hitchhiking on army ants. It was formally described in 2017.

References

  1. ↑ Dejean, Alain; Azémar, Frédéric; Roux, Olivier (2014-07-01). "An invasive ant species able to counterattack marabunta raids". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 337 (7): 474–479. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2014.05.004. ISSN   1631-0691. PMID   25103833.
  2. 1 2 3 Schneirla, Theodore Christian (1971). Topoff, Howard R. (ed.). Army Ants: A Study in Social Organization . San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN   978-0-7167-0933-6. OCLC   210501.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Brady, Seán G. (2003). "Evolution of the army ant syndrome: The origin and long-term evolutionary stasis of a complex of behavioral and reproductive adaptations". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (11): 6575–6579. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.6575B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1137809100 . PMC   164488 . PMID   12750466.
  4. ↑ "Army Ants Harbor a Host-Specific Clade of Entomoplasmatales Bacteria". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2019-04-04.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Gotwald, William H. Jr. (2 December 2012). "Army Ants". Social Insects. Vol. 4. Elsevier. pp. 157–254. ISBN   9780323152167. in Hermann 1982
  6. 1 2 Bourke, Andrew F. G; Franks, Nigel R. (1995). Social Evolution in Ants. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-04426-2. OCLC   32087436.
  7. 1 2 Trager, James C., ed. (1988). Advances in Myrmecology. Leiden, NL: E.J. Brill. ISBN   978-0-916846-38-1. OCLC   468279677.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Franks, Nigel R.; Hölldobler, Bert (1987). "Sexual competition during colony reproduction in army ants". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 30 (3): 229–243. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00298.x.
  9. ↑ "Driver Ants – info and games". www.sheppardsoftware.com. Retrieved 2019-04-04.
  10. 1 2 Kronauer, Daniel J. C.; Schöning, Caspar; Pedersen, Jes S. S.; Boomsma, Jacobus J.; Gadau, Jurgen R. (2004). "Extreme queen-mating frequency and colony fission in African army ants". Molecular Ecology. 13 (8): 2381–2388. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02262.x. PMID   15245410. S2CID   13887869.
  11. ↑ Wilson, Edward. O.; Hölldobler, Bert (September 2005). "Eusociality: Origin and consequences". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (38): 13367–13371. Bibcode:2005PNAS..10213367W. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505858102 . PMC   1224642 . PMID   16157878.
  12. 1 2 O'Donnell, Sean; Lattke, John; Powell, Scott; Kaspari, Michael (2021). "Diurnal and nocturnal foraging specialisation in Neotropical army ants". Ecological Entomology. 46 (2): 352–359. doi:10.1111/een.12969. ISSN   0307-6946.
  13. 1 2 3 Kronauer, Daniel J. C. (2009). "Recent advances in army ant biology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Myrmecological News . 12: 51–65.
  14. 1 2 Kronauer, Daniel J. C.; Johnson, Robert A.; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (2007). "The Evolution of multiple mating in army ants". Evolution. 61 (2): 413–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00040.x . PMID   17348950. S2CID   36371272.
  15. 1 2 Kronauer, Daniel J. C.; Schöning, Caspar; d'Ettorre, Patricia; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (2010). "Colony fusion and worker reproduction after queen loss in army ants". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 277 (1682): 755–763. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1591. PMC   2842746 . PMID   19889701.
  16. ↑ Schneirla, Theodore Christian (1949). "Army-ant Life and Behavior under Dry-season Conditions. 3, The Course of Reproduction and Colony Behavior" (PDF). Bulletin of the AMNH. 94. hdl:2246/407.
  17. 1 2 3 Kronauer, Daniel J. C.; Schöning, Caspar; Boomsma, Jacobus J. (2006). "Male parentage in army ants". Molecular Ecology. 15 (4): 1147–1151. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02850.x. PMID   16599973. S2CID   8393095.
  18. ↑ Delsuc F (2003). "Army Ants Trapped by Their Evolutionary History". PLOS Biology. 1 (2): e37. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000037 . PMC   261877 . PMID   14624241.
  19. 1 2 Franks, Nigel R.; Fletcher, Charles R. (1983). "Spatial Patterns in Army Ant Foraging and Migration: Eciton burchelli on Barro Colorado Island, Panama". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 12 (4): 261–270. doi:10.1007/BF00302894. S2CID   30296073.
  20. 1 2 3 Couzin, Iain D.; Franks, Nigel R. (2003). "Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 270 (1511): 139–146. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2210. PMC   1691225 . PMID   12590751.
  21. ↑ Deneubourg, Jean-Louis; Goss, S.; Franks, Nigel R.; Pasteels, Jacques M. (1989). "The blind leading the blind: Modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns". Journal of Insect Behavior. 2 (5): 719–725. doi:10.1007/BF01065789. S2CID   10750656.
  22. ↑ Reid, Chris; Carlesso, Daniele (April 19, 2021). "Bridges, highways, scaffolds: how the amazing engineering of army ants can make us smarter creators". The Conversation. Retrieved 2021-04-20.
  23. ↑ Angehr G, Dean R. 2010. The birds of Panama: a field guide. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 456 pp.[ ISBN missing ][ page needed ]
  24. ↑ Kent Livezey, Birding Pipeline Panama, Panama City, Panama[ ISBN missing ][ page needed ]
  25. ↑ Dawkins, Richard (1996) [1986]. "4. Making Tracks Through Animal Space". The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design. W. W. Norton & Company. p.  107. ISBN   978-0-393-31570-7.
  26. ↑ "The Army Ant". Kaieteur News. 2013-08-11. Retrieved 2019-04-04.
  27. ↑ Pérez-Espona, Sílvia (March 2021). "Eciton Army Ants – Umbrella Species for Conservation in Neotropical Forests". Diversity. 13 (3): 136. doi: 10.3390/d13030136 . hdl: 20.500.11820/be179574-8ff7-4531-b575-8ebecc801e3d .
  28. ↑ Hoenle, Philipp O.; Blüthgen, Nico; Brückner, Adrian; Kronauer, Daniel J. C.; Fiala, Brigitte; Donoso, David A.; Smith, M. Alex; Jara, Bryan Ospina; Beeren, Christoph von (2019). "Species-level predation network uncovers high prey specificity in a Neotropical army ant community". Molecular Ecology. 28 (9): 2423–2440. doi:10.1111/mec.15078. ISSN   1365-294X. PMID   31050080. S2CID   143433968.
  29. ↑ Boswell, Graeme P.; Britton, Nicholas F.; Franks, Nigel R. (1998). "Habitat fragmentation, percolation theory and the conservation of a keystone species". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 265 (1409): 1921–1925. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0521. PMC   1689475 .
  30. ↑ von Beeren, Christoph; Blüthgen, Nico; Hoenle, Philipp O.; Pohl, Sebastian; Brückner, Adrian; Tishechkin, Alexey K.; Maruyama, Munetoshi; Brown, Brian V.; Hash, John M.; Hall, W. E.; Kronauer, Daniel J. C. (2021). "A remarkable legion of guests: Diversity and host specificity of army ant symbionts". Molecular Ecology. 30 (20): 5229–5246. doi: 10.1111/mec.16101 . ISSN   1365-294X. PMID   34406688. S2CID   237199045.
  31. 1 2 3 Rettenmeyer, C. W.; Rettenmeyer, M. E.; Joseph, J.; Berghoff, S. M. (2011-08-01). "The largest animal association centered on one species: the army ant Eciton burchellii and its more than 300 associates" . Insectes Sociaux. 58 (3): 281–292. doi:10.1007/s00040-010-0128-8. ISSN   1420-9098. S2CID   32688600.
  32. ↑ Wrege, Peter H.; Wikelski, M.; Mandel, J. T.; Rassweiler, T.; Couzin, I. D. (2005). "Antbirds parasitize foraging army ants". Ecology. 8 (3): 555–559. doi:10.1890/04-1133. S2CID   1704704.
  33. ↑ Willis, Edwin O.; Oniki, Yoshika (1978). "Birds and Army Ants". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 9 (1): 243–263. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001331. ISSN   0066-4162 – via ResearchGate.
  34. ↑ Kronauer, Daniel J. C. (2020). Army Ants. Cambridge, MA. ISBN   978-0-674-24941-7. OCLC   1224277932.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  35. ↑ von Beeren, Christoph; Maruyama, Munetoshi; Kronauer, Daniel J. C. (2016). "Cryptic diversity, high host specificity and reproductive synchronization in army ant-associated Vatesus beetles". Molecular Ecology. 25 (4): 990–1005. doi:10.1111/mec.13500. ISSN   1365-294X. PMID   26618779. S2CID   22773782.
  36. ↑ von Beeren, Christoph; Maruyama, Munetoshi; Kronauer, Daniel J. C. (2016-11-09). "Community Sampling and Integrative Taxonomy Reveal New Species and Host Specificity in the Army Ant-Associated Beetle Genus Tetradonia (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae)". PLOS ONE. 11 (11): e0165056. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1165056V. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165056 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   5102370 . PMID   27829037.
  37. ↑ von Beeren, Christoph; Tishechkin, Alexey K. (2017-02-10). "Nymphister kronaueri von Beeren & Tishechkin sp. nov., an army ant-associated beetle species (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Haeteriinae) with an exceptional mechanism of phoresy". BMC Zoology. 2 (1): 3. doi: 10.1186/s40850-016-0010-x . ISSN   2056-3132.
  38. ↑ J.C Kronauer, Daniel (10 November 2008). "Recent advances in army ant biology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Myrmecological News. 12: 51–65. eISSN   1997-3500. ISSN   1994-4136. S2CID   17965336.
  39. ↑ Whitehouse, David (2003-05-10). "Ant history revealed". Science & Environment. BBC News Online. Retrieved 2009-01-14.
  40. ↑ Engel, Michael S.; Grimaldi, David A. (2005). "Primitive new ants in Cretaceous amber from Myanmar, New Jersey, and Canada (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)" (PDF). American Museum Novitates (3485): 1–24. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2005)485[0001:PNAICA]2.0.CO;2. hdl:2246/5676. S2CID   84043939.
  41. ↑ Brady, Seán G; Fisher, Brian L; Schultz, Ted R; Ward, Philip S (2014). "The rise of army ants and their relatives: diversification of specialized predatory doryline ants". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 14: 2–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-93 . PMC   4021219 . PMID   24886136.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.