Climate reparations

Last updated

Climate reparations are a type of requested loss and damage payments for damage and harm caused by climate change, which may include debt cancellation. [1] [2] [3] The term climate reparations differs from simple "loss and damage," in that it is based on the concept of reparations, that compensation holds countries accountable for historical emissions, and is an ethical and moral obligation. [4] [5] [2]

Contents

"The idea behind calls for loss and damage funding is that the countries that have done most to pollute the atmosphere, and grown rich doing so, should compensate," according to The New Republic . [6]

The High Commissioner for Human Rights has states that human rights obligations require that states cooperate toward the promotion of human rights globally, including adequate financing from those who can best afford it. This requires climate change mitigation, adaptation, and rectification of damage. The subject of reparations must be considered with equity to be the center of global response. This requires that the counties who have disproportionately created the environmental crisis must do more to compensate for the damages they have cause, including respecting the most vulnerable countries. Generally, reparations are an effort to redress societal harm through the acknowledgement of wrongdoing and through in-kind and monetary means. Acceptance of responsibility, followed by undertaking that address and repair societal injustices and widespread harms are key principles of reparatory justice. In the context of climate change, it would require identifying those who have contributed the most greenhouse gas emissions with the harms they have caused and rectify the serious damage inflicted disproportionately on low income countries. [7]

Current efforts

Climate reparations have been under discussion in connection with the catastrophic 2022 Pakistan floods. [8] [9] [10] As of October 14, 2022, the Scottish government is calling for loss and damage funding as a moral responsibility. [2]

Loss and damage was discussed at COP26. As a part of its COP26 coverage, New York Magazine featured a David Wallace-Wells article about climate reparations on its cover. [11] A Bangladeshi consultant remarked at COP26, "The term ‘loss and damage’ is a euphemism for terms we’re not allowed to use, which are ‘liability and compensation' ... ‘Reparations’ is even worse." [12]

At COP27, climate reparations, in the form of loss and damage funding for developing nations, are "top of the agenda", according to the World Economic Forum. [13] [14] [15] Environment and Climate Change Canada has announced support for discussion of "loss and damage," and the U.S. has announced support for "formal negotiations over possible climate reparations." [16] [17]

Two days before the COP27 talks began, a compromise was reached, "that discussion would focus on 'cooperation and facilitation' not 'liability or compensation.'" [18]

Vanuatu's starting point for climate reparations at COP27 is US $117 million. [19]

At the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, there have been a consistent opposition to climate reparations from the wealthiest and most powerful nations. These same nations have benefited from current carbon emissions and using an excess of their atmospheric budget. Furthermore, this would require the redistribution of resources from the wealthy nations to colonized areas across the globe. [20]

Considerations for implementation

A 2023 study published in One Earth estimated that the top 21 fossil fuel companies will owe cumulative climate reparations of $5.4 trillion over the period 2025–2050. [21]

Climate reparations have been described as a "human rights challenge." [22]

A "corrective justice model" could be based on governments accepting moral responsibility for damage to climate. In this model, the countries most responsible provide funding to the affected, poorer countries, which has done relatively little damage to climate. Funds might be distributed by an “international compensation commission,” which adjudicates claims by affected countries. [5]

Another approach would be lawsuits against corporations responsible for carbon emissions or damage to climate, in which courts would determine the funding to be distributed to affected parties. [5] [23]

Compensation could be distributed based on a "Polluter Pays" principle, meaning "that in addition to having to cover the expense of corrective action, the polluter also has to pay to compensate those who have suffered environmental harm as a result of their conduct." [24]

Mechanisms for distribution of funding could include debt forgiveness and direct grants for climate adaptation and mitigation efforts. [5]

Challenges for implementation include accountability and evaluation to ensure that funds do not disappear due to corruption. [5] Although IPCC has a task force on measuring emissions, it does not yet have a task force capable of establishing metrics for climate mitigation impact. [25]

Opposition

Some opponents have argued that current generations should not be considered responsible for the greenhouse gas emissions of their ancestors. Since it was not widely understood before 1990 that greenhouse gas emissions would be a problem, some opponents argue that pre-1990 emissions should not be taken into consideration. One organization has pointed out that a relatively small number of corporations have been knowingly responsible for large amounts of damaging emissions for forty years, and argues that a public which has been willfully deceived by corporate public relations campaigns should not be expected to pay for these damages. [26]

Proponents

Vanuatu, a small island nation vulnerable to sea-level rise, has considered suing for climate reparations. [27] [28]

Pakistan and other nations from the Global South will be pushing for climate reparations at COP27. [10] [29] [30] [ needs update ]

Organizations supporting debt cancellation as a means of climate finance include the African Forum and Network on Debt and Development, the CARICOM Reparations Committee, the Transnational Accountability & Justice Initiative, Fridays for Future Bangladesh, and the Jubilee Debt Campaign. [29] [31] Climate campaigners have estimated that the G20 nations are collectively responsible for about 80% of greenhouse gas emissions, and some assert that expecting the poorer countries to bear the brunt of climate impacts is essentially continuing a legacy of colonialism and oppression connected with extractive industries. [28]

Fridays for Future strikes “for climate reparations and justice" took place in about 450 locations in September 2022, including Berlin, Kinshasa, Bengalauru, India, New Zealand, and Japan. [32]

An opinion piece in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists suggests that "rather than on locking down borders as a response to climate migration,' it is important to acknowledge "climate displacement as something driven by our fossil-fueled way of life in the Global North," and "focus on the question of responsibility and reparations, in a moral, legal, and financial framework under international law." [23]

The CARICOM Reparations Commission is more blunt: "Either we allow climate migrants to move in, or we compensate these refugees financially for the damages caused by our greenhouse gas emissions." [33]

Precedent

The principle of loss and damage appears in the 2015 Paris Agreement as a mechanism for climate finance. [34]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change mitigation</span> Actions to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to limit climate change

Climate change mitigation is action to limit the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that cause climate change. Greenhouse gas emissions are primarily caused by people burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. Phasing out fossil fuel use can happen by conserving energy and replacing fossil fuels with clean energy sources such as wind, hydro, solar, and nuclear power. Secondary mitigation strategies include changes to land use and removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. Governments have pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but actions to date are insufficient to avoid dangerous levels of climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecological debt</span> Environmental debt between Global North and South

Ecological debt refers to the accumulated debt seen by some campaigners as owed by the Global North to Global South countries, due to the net sum of historical environmental injustice, especially through resource exploitation, habitat degradation, and pollution by waste discharge. The concept was coined by Global Southerner non-governmental organizations in the 1990s and its definition has varied over the years, in several attempts of greater specification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions</span> Sources and amounts of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere from human activities

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide, from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before. Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2017 were 425±20 GtC from fossil fuels and industry, and 180±60 GtC from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2017, coal 32%, oil 25%, and gas 10%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate justice</span> Term linking the climate crisis with environmental and social justice

Climate justice is an approach to climate action that focuses on the unequal impacts of climate change on marginalized or otherwise vulnerable populations. Climate justice wants to achieve an equitable distribution of both the burdens of climate change and the efforts to mitigate climate change. Climate justice is a type of environmental justice.

Environmental issues in Canada include impacts of climate change, air and water pollution, mining, logging, and the degradation of natural habitats. As one of the world's significant emitters of greenhouse gasses, Canada has the potential to make contributions to curbing climate change with its environmental policies and conservation efforts.

The climate policy of China is to peak its greenhouse gas emissions before 2030 and to be carbon neutral before 2060. Due to the large buildout of solar power in China and burning of coal in China the energy policy of China is closely related to its climate policy. There is also policy to adapt to climate change. Ding Xuexiang represented China at the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2023, and may be influential in setting climate policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate debt</span>

Climate debt is the debt said to be owed to developing countries by developed countries for the damage caused by their disproportionately large contributions to climate change. Historical global greenhouse gas emissions, largely by developed countries, pose significant threats to developing countries, who are less able to deal with climate change's negative effects. Therefore, some consider developed countries to owe a debt to developing ones for their disproportionate contributions to climate change.

Reparations are broadly understood as compensation given for an abuse or injury. The colloquial meaning of reparations has changed substantively over the last century. In the early 1900s, reparations were interstate exchanges that were punitive mechanisms determined by treaty and paid by the surrendering side of conflict, such as the World War I reparations paid by Germany and its allies. Reparations are now understood as not only war damages but also compensation and other measures provided to victims of severe human rights violations by the parties responsible. The right of the victim of an injury to receive reparations and the duty of the part responsible to provide them has been secured by the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paris Agreement</span> 2015 international treaty on climate change

The Paris Agreement, often referred to as the Paris Accords or the Paris Climate Accords, is an international treaty on climate change. Adopted in 2015, the agreement covers climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance. The Paris Agreement was negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference near Paris, France. As of February 2023, 195 members of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are parties to the agreement. Of the three UNFCCC member states which have not ratified the agreement, the only major emitter is Iran. The United States withdrew from the agreement in 2020, but rejoined in 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Europe</span> Emissions, impacts and responses of Europe related to climate change

Climate change has resulted in an increase in temperature of 2.3 °C (2022) in Europe compared to pre-industrial levels. Europe is the fastest warming continent in the world. Europe's climate is getting warmer due to anthropogenic activity. According to international climate experts, global temperature rise should not exceed 2 °C to prevent the most dangerous consequences of climate change; without reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, this could happen before 2050. Climate change has implications for all regions of Europe, with the extent and nature of impacts varying across the continent.

Loss and damage is a concept to describe results from the adverse effects of climate change and how to deal with them. There has been slow progress on implementing mitigation and adaptation. Some losses and damages are already occurring, and further loss and damage is unavoidable. There is a distinction between economic losses and non-economic losses. The main difference between the two is that non-economic losses involve things that are not commonly traded in markets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Climate Change Conference</span> Yearly conference held for climate change treaty negotiations

The United Nations Climate Change Conferences are yearly conferences held in the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). They serve as the formal meeting of the UNFCCC parties – the Conference of the Parties (COP) – to assess progress in dealing with climate change, and beginning in the mid-1990s, to negotiate the Kyoto Protocol to establish legally binding obligations for developed countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Starting in 2005 the conferences have also served as the "Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of Parties to the Kyoto Protocol" (CMP); also parties to the convention that are not parties to the protocol can participate in protocol-related meetings as observers. From 2011 to 2015 the meetings were used to negotiate the Paris Agreement as part of the Durban platform, which created a general path towards climate action. Any final text of a COP must be agreed by consensus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon budget</span> Limit on carbon dioxide emission for a given climate impact

A carbon budget is a concept used in climate policy to help set emissions reduction targets in a fair and effective way. It examines the "maximum amount of cumulative net global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions that would result in limiting global warming to a given level". It can be expressed relative to the pre-industrial period. In this case, it is the total carbon budget. Or it can be expressed from a recent specified date onwards. In that case it is the remaining carbon budget.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference</span> 26th UN Climate Change conference held in Glasgow, Scotland

The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference, more commonly referred to as COP26, was the 26th United Nations Climate Change conference, held at the SEC Centre in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, from 31 October to 13 November 2021. The president of the conference was UK cabinet minister Alok Sharma. Delayed for a year due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the third meeting of the parties to the 2015 Paris Agreement, and the 16th meeting of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP16).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in the Marshall Islands</span>

Climate change in the Marshall Islands is a major issue for the country. As with many countries made up of low-lying islands, the Marshall Islands is highly vulnerable to sea level rise and other impacts of climate change. The atoll and capital city of Majuro are particularly vulnerable, and the issue poses significant implications for the country's population. These threats have prompted Marshallese political leaders to make climate change a key diplomatic issue, who have responded with initiatives such as the Majuro Declaration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate target</span> Policy for emissions reductions

A climate target, climate goal or climate pledge is a measurable long-term commitment for climate policy and energy policy with the aim of limiting the climate change. Researchers within, among others, the UN climate panel have identified probable consequences of global warming for people and nature at different levels of warming. Based on this, politicians in a large number of countries have agreed on temperature targets for warming, which is the basis for scientifically calculated carbon budgets and ways to achieve these targets. This in turn forms the basis for politically decided global and national emission targets for greenhouse gases, targets for fossil-free energy production and efficient energy use, and for the extent of planned measures for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference</span> Yearly conference held for climate change treaty negotiations

The 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference or Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC, more commonly referred to as COP27, was the 27th United Nations Climate Change conference, held from 6 November until 20 November 2022 in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. It took place under the presidency of Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sameh Shoukry, with more than 92 heads of state and an estimated 35,000 representatives, or delegates, of 190 countries attending. It was the fifth climate summit held in Africa, and the first since 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IPCC Sixth Assessment Report</span> Intergovernmental report on climate change

The Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the sixth in a series of reports which assess scientific, technical, and socio-economic information concerning climate change. Three Working Groups covered the following topics: The Physical Science Basis (WGI); Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (WGII); Mitigation of Climate Change (WGIII). Of these, the first study was published in 2021, the second report February 2022, and the third in April 2022. The final synthesis report was finished in March 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change ethics</span>

Climate change ethics is a field of study that explores the moral aspects of climate change. Climate change is often studied and addressed by scientists, economists, and policymakers in value neutral ways. However, philosophers such as Stephen M. Gardiner and the scientific authors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), argue that decisions related to climate change are moral issues and involve value judgment. Climate change involves difficult moral questions relating to global inequality and human development, who bears responsibility for past emissions, as well as the role of future generations, personal responsibility and many more.

Lukas H. Meyer is a German philosopher, academic and author. He is a university professor as well as speaker of the working section Moral and Political Philosophy at the University of Graz.

References

  1. Frost, Rosie (2022-07-27). "Climate damage likely amounts to €trillions. Who owes who for what?". Euronews . Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  2. 1 2 3 "'A moral responsibility': Scotland calls for climate reparations ahead of COP27". MSN. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  3. Fecht, Sarah (2022-11-01). "Loss and Damage: What Is It, and Will There Be Progress at COP27?". State of the Planet, Columbia Climate School. Retrieved 2022-11-03.
  4. Manke, Kara (2022-05-04). "What is the role of reparations in delivering climate justice?". Berkeley News. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Bhadani, Anita (2021-11-29). "A Guide to Climate Reparations". YES! Magazine. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  6. Gordon, Noah (2022-10-26). "Climate Reparations Really Aren't That Radical—or Hard". The New Republic. ISSN   0028-6583 . Retrieved 2022-11-03.
  7. Chapman, Audrey (December 23, 2021). "Climate Justice, Human Rights, and the Case for Reparations". Health and Human Rights. 23 (2): 81–94. PMC   8694300 . PMID   34966227.
  8. AHMED, Issam. "Why are climate activists calling for reparations?". phys.org. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  9. Saul Elbein, Sharon Udasin (2022-08-23). "Equilibrium/Sustainability — Island willing to sue for climate reparations". The Hill. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  10. 1 2 Yousaf, Kamrani (2022-11-01). "Pakistan to push for climate reparations at COP27". The Express Tribune. Retrieved 2022-11-03.
  11. Starke, Lauren (2021-11-01). "On the Cover of New York Magazine: Climate Reparations". New York Press Room. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  12. Sengupta, Somini (2021-11-11). "Calls for Climate Reparations Reach Boiling Point in Glasgow Talks". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-11-08.
  13. Sadasivam, Naveena (2022-10-11). "Climate reparations are on the agenda at COP27 — whether wealthy nations like it or not". Salon. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  14. Chugh, Abhinav (2022-10-27). "Loss and Damage: Why climate reparations are top of the agenda at COP27". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  15. Kaplan, Sarah; George, Susannah (2022-11-05). "At COP27, flood-battered Pakistan leads push to make polluting countries pay". Washington Post . Retrieved 2022-11-06.
  16. El Wardany, Salma (2022-10-20). "Rich Nations May Finally Need to Talk Climate Reparations at COP". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  17. Sadasivam, Naveena (2022-10-27). "The US is finally ready to discuss climate reparations. But is it ready to act?". Grist. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  18. Ainger, John; El Wardany, Salma; Dlouhy, Jennifer A (2022-11-06). "COP27 Talks Begin With Deal to Discuss Climate Reparations". www.bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2022-11-08.
  19. Sommer, Lauren (2022-11-07). "Developing countries want climate reparations. Here's what it could cost". NPR.org. Retrieved 2022-11-08.
  20. Dearing, Aissa (December 7, 2023). "Climate Justice as Climate Reparations". JSTOR DAILY. Retrieved February 20, 2024.
  21. Grasso, Marco; Heede, Richard (19 May 2023). "Time to pay the piper: Fossil fuel companies' reparations for climate damages". One Earth. 6 (5): 459–463. Bibcode:2023OEart...6..459G. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.04.012 . hdl: 10281/416137 .
  22. Chapman, Audrey R.; Ahmed, A. Karim (2021). "Climate Justice, Humans Rights, and the Case for Reparations". Health and Human Rights. 23 (2): 81–94. ISSN   1079-0969. PMC   8694300 . PMID   34966227.
  23. 1 2 Drollette, Dan (2020-11-06). "The case for climate reparations". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  24. "What is Climate Reparation?". Legacy IAS Academy, Bangalore, India. 2022-09-08. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  25. Tham, Natalie (2022-10-04). "Climate reparations may be ethical, but they aren't the best fix, climatologist says". CNBC. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  26. Ampe, Teagan (2021-11-15). "Climate Change Reparations: Who Should Carry the Cost?". Viterbi Conversations in Ethics. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  27. "Pakistan's Biblical Floods and the Case for Climate Reparations". The New Yorker. 2022-09-26. Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  28. 1 2 "'A form of colonialism': Activists demand climate reparations". Al Jazeera . 2022-09-25. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  29. 1 2 Táíwò, Olúfémi O.; Bigger, Patrick (2022-04-22). "The Global South Is Calling for Climate Reparations". The Nation . ISSN   0027-8378 . Retrieved 2022-10-18.
  30. "Why are climate activists calling for reparations?". The New Indian Express. 2022-09-25. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  31. Bhadani, Anita (2021-11-30). "A guide to climate reparations". NationofChange. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  32. Gayle, Damien (2022-09-23). "Thousands call for 'climate reparations and justice' in global protests". the Guardian. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  33. Rojas, Don (2020-11-29). "The Case for Climate Reparations". Caribbean Reparations Commission. Archived from the original on 2022-11-04. Retrieved 2022-11-04.
  34. McDonnell, Tim (2022-10-19). "COP27 is all about the money". Quartz. Retrieved 2022-10-20.