India: The Modi Question

Last updated

India: The Modi Question
India- The Modi Question thumbnail.jpg
Title card
GenreDocumentary
Country of originUnited Kingdom
Original languageEnglish
No. of episodes2
Production
Executive producersRichard Cookson
Mike Radford
Running time60 minutes (per episode)
Original release
Network BBC Two
BBC iPlayer
Release17 January (2023-01-17) –
24 January 2023 (2023-01-24)

India: The Modi Question is a 2023 two-part documentary series aired by BBC Two about the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his relationship with the Muslim minority in the country. The first part covers Modi's early political career and his role in the 2002 Gujarat riots, which occurred when he was the chief minister of Gujarat. [1] It discusses documents found by the BBC, including a UK government report stating that the violence in Gujarat showed "all the hallmarks of an ethnic cleansing". [2] The second part examines the activities of Modi's administration following his re-election in 2019. It covers a series of controversial policies, including the revocation of Kashmir's autonomy and a new citizenship law. [3] It also depicts the violent response to protests against the new laws, and the aftermath of the 2020 Delhi riots. [3]

Contents

The Government of India banned the documentary from being screened, describing it as "hostile propaganda and anti-India garbage", [4] and asked social media sites to take down snippets of the documentary shared by users. [2] In response to the government's ban, the BBC said that the documentary had been researched "rigorously", and that it depicted a "wide range of voices", including the opinions of figures within Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party. [5] The ban was frequently circumvented, and several student organisations held screenings in various parts of the country. The ban was criticised by opposition politicians as censorship, [6] and described as an assault on freedom of the press by commentators and human rights groups. [7]

Background

Anti-Muslim riots occurred in the Indian state of Gujarat in 2002. [7] Over one thousand people were killed, most of them Muslim, and 150,000 people were displaced. [8] The riots followed the deaths of Hindu pilgrims on a train in Godhra, [8] for which the state's Muslim minority was blamed. [9] The riots were among the worst religious violence since India became an independent country in 1947. [10] Narendra Modi, a member of the Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), was at the time the chief minister of Gujarat. [9] [8] His administration is considered complicit in the riots, [11] [12] [13] [14] or otherwise criticised for its management of the crisis. A Special Investigation Team appointed by the Supreme Court of India found no evidence to initiate prosecution proceedings against Modi personally. [15] [16]

Modi's role in the riots remains a source of controversy. [10] After the BJP won the 2014 Indian general election and Modi was appointed prime minister, Indian Muslims have been the target of increased violence, on which Modi has largely not commented. [7] [17] The policies of the Modi administration have been seen as discriminatory toward India's Muslim minority, and as entrenching a right-wing Hindu-nationalist image of the country. [18] Reporters Without Borders says that press freedom in the country has declined, and that the government has shut down criticism of it on social media. [7] The Modi administration has often put pressure on Twitter to remove tweets the government perceives as critical of Modi or the BJP. [7]

Content

The first segment of the documentary, approximately an hour in length, [10] covered Modi's early political career in the BJP, his appointment as chief minister of Gujarat in 2001, and his role in the 2002 Gujarat riots. [1] [19] It discussed documents found by the BBC, which showed that Modi's conduct was criticised at the time by diplomats and the Government of the United Kingdom. [2] These include a report stating that the violence in Gujarat showed "all the hallmarks of an ethnic cleansing". [2] The documents also cited police officers who stated that the police were prevented from aiding Muslim rape victims by pressure from the state government, and noted religious bias in how relief funds were distributed. [20] Jack Straw, at the time the UK Foreign Secretary, is depicted saying that there were "serious claims" that Modi was actively restricting the activities of the police, and also "tacitly encouraging the Hindu extremists". [21]

The second part, released on 24 January 2023, and also an hour long, examines the activities of Modi's administration following his re-election as prime minister of India in 2019. It examines a series of controversial policies, including the revocation of Kashmir's autonomy in 2019 and a new citizenship law. [3] It depicts the violent response by security forces to protests against the new laws, and interviews the family members of people who died in the 2020 Delhi riots. [3]

Release and reaction

The first part of the two-part documentary was released by the BBC on 17 January 2023, [19] and the second part on 24 January. [3] It was not scheduled to be broadcast in India. [9] The Indian Ministry of Information and Broadcasting described the documentary as propaganda, stated that it lacked objectivity, and "reflected a colonial mindset." [1] A government minister stated that watching the documentary was treasonous. [9] It was later banned in India, with the government invoking a 2021 law that increased its power to censor social media. [22] Twitter and YouTube blocked posts linking to the documentary on their platforms following legal demands from the Indian government. [23] The ban on the documentary has been frequently circumvented; clips from the documentary circulated on WhatsApp, Telegram, and Twitter, [22] and VPNs were used to circumvent the ban. [8] Commentators argued that the ban had drawn more attention to the documentary than it would otherwise have received, [22] [7] a phenomenon known as the Streisand effect. [24] [25] The ban was challenged in the Supreme Court of India. The court agreed on 3 February to hear two petitions by Mahua Moitra and Prashant Bhushan. [26] [27] Right-wing Hindu-nationalist groups also petitioned the Supreme Court to ban the BBC altogether; the court described the petition as "absolutely meritless", and rejected it. [17] In March, the Assam Legislative Assembly, majority-controlled by the BJP, adopted a resolution put forward by the BJP MLA Bhubon Pegu, who alleged that the documentary raised doubts over Indian press freedom, the country's judicial system and the government, seeking an action against the BBC. [28]

Screenings of the documentary were organised in late January by a Fraternity Movement students' group at Hyderabad Central University and the Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) screened it in various parts of Kerala. [29] [30] Discussing its decision, DYFI stated: "Let people see the fascist face of the Sangh Parivar outfits. We will go ahead with the plan and more screenings will be done at other places also in the coming days." [31] The Indian Youth Congress said that it too would screen the documentary in Kerala. [32] The Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union also decided to screen the documentary. However, electricity and internet access to the room where the screening was to take place were cut by university authorities, leading to students streaming the documentary on their cell phones. [8] [33] After students at Jamia Millia University planned a screening, at least a dozen students were arrested, and the university entrances blocked. [33] [34] Witnesses stated that policemen with riot gear and tear gas had been sent into the university campus. [9] The All India Students Association also screened the documentary in late January, with students attending from several colleges in Bangalore including Christ College, Indian Institute of Science, and Azim Premji University. [35] The documentary was screened at the Parliament House in Australia by lawmakers and activists, during Modi's Australia trip in May 2023 to meet the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. [36]

The ban on India: The Modi Question was described as an assault on freedom of the press by independent commentators, human rights groups, and opposition parties. [7] [9] [37] Trinamool Congress leaders Derek O'Brien and Mahua Moitra, who tweeted video links to the documentary, criticised the move as censorship. [38] The Guardian wrote that the ban on the documentary had occurred during a period of restricted press freedom in India, during which journalists had experienced harassment by the government and the judiciary. [2] According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), the ban was an example of the harsh treatment of religious minorities under Modi's administration. HRW stated that the government under Modi had often used "draconian" laws to silence critics of the government. [7] [39] Slate described the ban as an example of "pervasive" hostility to freedom of the press and censorship of criticism. [20] In response to the first part of the documentary, more than three hundred Indian former judges, bureaucrats, and soldiers released a statement which criticised the BBC for "unrelenting hostility" towards India. [40] More than five hundred Indian scholars signed a petition criticising the ban, stating that it "violates our rights, as Indians, to access and discuss important information about our society and government". [41] A New York Times editorial described the ban as the most recent example of the Modi's suppression of press freedom. [37]

The BBC's offices in Mumbai and New Delhi were the targets of searches by the Income Tax Department of India in February 2023. [42] The searches began on 14 February, and continued for three days. [43] [44] Phones and laptops belonging to employees were searched. [45] The searches were seen by commentators as being in retaliation for the documentary, [46] and received condemnation from the Editors Guild of India, a nonprofit organisation of journalists promoting press freedom, Amnesty International India, and opposition parties. [42] Reporters Without Borders said that the Indian tax department raids "have all the appearance of a reprisal" and denounced the "government’s attempts to clamp down on independent media." [47]

Reception

A review of India: The Modi Question in the Deccan Herald was positive, stating that the documentary had notably given space to a variety of opinions, including those of BJP members. [48] It described the portrayal of the Gujarat riots "comprehensive", and called the documentary "sharp". However, it stated that the documentary had fallen short in assessing other shortcomings of the Modi administration, and in understanding the links between religious majoritarianism and gender and caste. [48] Political scientist Christophe Jaffrelot, among the scholars interviewed in the documentary, stated in an interview that the BBC had produced an "incredibly rigorous" piece of work. [49]

A commentary in The News Minute was critical, stating that while the documentary had "interviewed the best voices", it had failed to uncover substantive new ground, and therefore allowed the Modi administration to "use the films for one more round of propaganda – painting themselves as victims". [50] The author wrote that the first segment failed to interrogate open questions about the Godhra train burning. [50] She was more positive about the second segment, but criticised it for not being sufficiently bold, particularly with its footage of Hindu extremists fomenting violence and of Muslims being beaten by the police during the 2020 Delhi riots. [50]

Discussing the first segment of the documentary, a commentary in the Telegraph noted that the majority of the narrative covered the well-documented history of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Modi's career, and the Gujarat riots, with the only new material being British government reports. [51] The author criticized the documentary for failing to interrogate why Western governments were willing to engage with Modi when documents in their position called him a violator of human rights, [51] an opinion echoed by The News Minute review. [50] The author was also critical of the ban on the documentary, stating that any criticism of Modi and the Sangh Parivar was being derided as "colonial" by these same organisations even though they had acted as raj-toadies during the colonial period and did "precious little to remove colonialism from India". [51]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bharatiya Janata Party</span> Indian political party

The Bharatiya Janata Party is a political party in India and one of the two major Indian political parties alongside the Indian National Congress. Since 2014, it has been the ruling political party in India under the incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The BJP is aligned with right-wing politics and has close ideological and organisational links to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) volunteer paramilitary organisation. Its policies adhere to Hindutva, a Hindu nationalist ideology. As of January 2024, it is the country's biggest political party in terms of representation in the Parliament of India as well as state legislatures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Narendra Modi</span> Prime Minister of India since 2014 (born 1950)

Narendra Damodardas Modi is an Indian politician who has served as the 14th prime minister of India since May 2014. Modi was the chief minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014 and is the Member of Parliament (MP) for Varanasi. He is a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right wing Hindu nationalist paramilitary volunteer organisation. He is the longest-serving prime minister from outside the Indian National Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pravin Togadia</span> Indian oncologist, activist

Pravin Togadia is an Indian doctor, cancer surgeon and an advocate for Hindu nationalism, coming from the state of Gujarat. He was the former International Working President of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and a cancer surgeon by qualification. He is Founder and Current President of Antarashtriya Hindu Parishad. He had a falling out with the Sangh Parivar and is a vocal critic of Narendra Modi.

The Godhra train burning occurred on the morning of 27 February 2002: 59 Hindu pilgrims and karsevaks returning from Ayodhya were killed in a fire inside the Sabarmati Express near the Godhra railway station in the Indian state of Gujarat. The cause of the fire remains disputed. The Gujarat riots, in which Muslims were the targets of widespread and severe violence, occurred shortly afterward.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2002 Gujarat riots</span> Sectarian violence in the Indian state

The 2002 Gujarat riots, also known as the 2002 Gujarat violence, was a three-day period of inter-communal violence in the western Indian state of Gujarat. The burning of a train in Godhra on 27 February 2002, which caused the deaths of 58 Hindu pilgrims and karsevaks returning from Ayodhya, is cited as having instigated the violence. Following the initial riot incidents, there were further outbreaks of violence in Ahmedabad for three months; statewide, there were further outbreaks of violence against the minority Muslim population of Gujarat for the next year.

Final Solution is a 2004 documentary film directed by Rakesh Sharma concerning the 2002 Gujarat riots in the state of Gujarat in which 254 Hindus and 790 Muslims were killed. Hindu right wing organizations were made responsible for these riots which took place as a "spontaneous response" to the killing of 70 Hindu Pilgrims in the Godhra Train Burning by a mob of radical muslims on 27 February 2002. But as the film proceeds with victims continuing to come forward and share their experiences, a more unsettling possibility seems to emerge- that far from being a spontaneous expression of outrage. The makers of the film claim that the violence had been carefully coordinated and planned.

Religious violence in India includes acts of violence by followers of one religious group against followers and institutions of another religious group, often in the form of rioting. Religious violence in India has generally involved Hindus and Muslims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Premiership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee</span> Indian prime minister 1998–1999

Atal Bihari Vajpayee was an Indian politician who served twice as Prime Minister of India, first from 16 May to 1 June 1996, and then from 19 March 1998 to 22 May 2004. A member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Vajpayee was the tenth Prime Minister. He headed the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance in the Indian Parliament, and became the first Prime Minister unaffiliated with the Indian National Congress to complete a full five-year term in office. He died at the age of 93 on Thursday 16 August 2018 at 17:05 at AIIMS, New Delhi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amit Shah</span> 31st and current Home Minister of India (born 1964)

Amit Anil Chandra Shah is an Indian politician who is currently serving as the 31st Minister of Home Affairs since 2019 and the 1st Minister of Co-operation of India since 2021. He served as the 10th President of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) from 2014 to 2020. He has also served as chairman of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) since 2014. He was elected to the lower house of Parliament, Lok Sabha, in the 2019 Indian general elections from Gandhinagar. Earlier, he had been elected as a member of the upper house of Parliament, Rajya Sabha, from Gujarat from 2017 to 2019.

Sanjiv Bhatt is a former Indian Police Service officer of the Gujarat-cadre. He is known for his role in filing an affidavit in the Supreme Court of India against the then Chief Minister of the Government of Gujarat, Narendra Modi, concerning Modi's alleged role in the 2002 Gujarat riots. He claimed to have attended a meeting, during which Modi allegedly asked top police officials to let Hindus vent their anger against the Muslims. However, the Special Investigation Team appointed by the Supreme Court of India concluded that Bhatt did not attend any such meeting, and dismissed his allegations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Naroda Patiya massacre</span> Massacre during the 2002 Gujarat riots

The Naroda Patiya massacre took place on 28 February 2002 at Naroda, in Ahmedabad, India, during the 2002 Gujarat riots. 97 Muslims were killed by a mob of approximately 5,000 people, organised by the Bajrang Dal, a wing of the Vishva Hindu Parishad, and allegedly supported by the Bharatiya Janata Party which was in power in the Gujarat State Government. The massacre at Naroda occurred during the bandh (strike) called by Vishwa Hindu Parishad a day after the Godhra train burning. The riot lasted over 10 hours, during which the mob plundered, stabbed, sexually assaulted, gang-raped and burnt people individually and in groups. After the conflict, a curfew was imposed in the state and Indian Army troops were called in to contain further violence.

The Truth: Gujarat 2002 was an investigative report on the 2002 Gujarat riots published by India's Tehelka news magazine in its 7 November 2007 issue. The video footage was screened by the news channel Aaj Tak. The report, based on a six-month-long investigation and involving video sting operations, stated that the violence was made possible by the support of the state police and the then Chief Minister of Gujarat Narendra Modi for the perpetrators. The report and the reactions to it were widely covered in Indian and international media. The recordings were authenticated by India's Central Bureau of Investigation on 10 May 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campaigning in the 2014 Indian general election</span>

The Indian general election of 2014 were held to constitute the 16th Lok Sabha in India. Voting took place in all 543 parliamentary constituencies of India to elect members of parliament in the Lok Sabha. The result of this election was declared on 16 May. The 15th Lok Sabha completed its constitutional mandate on 31 May 2014. Since the last general election in 2009, the 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement by Anna Hazare, and other similar moves by Baba Ramdev, have gathered momentum and political interest. Issues such as Inflation, price rise and corruption were some of the chief issues.

There have been several instances of religious violence against Muslims since the partition of India in 1947, frequently in the form of violent attacks on Muslims by Hindu nationalist mobs that form a pattern of sporadic sectarian violence between the Hindu and Muslim communities. Over 10,000 people have been killed in Hindu-Muslim communal violence since 1950 in 6,933 instances of communal violence between 1954 and 1982.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public image of Narendra Modi</span> Public views on Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Narendra Modi, the 14th Prime Minister of India, has elicited a number of public perceptions regarding his personality, background and policies.

Cow vigilante violence is a pattern of mob-based collective vigilante violence seen in India. The attacks are perpetuated by Hindu nationalists against non-Hindus to protect cows, which are considered sacred in Hinduism.

Conservatism in India refers to expressions of conservative politics in India. Conservative-oriented political parties have included the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Congress Nationalist Party, and the Uttar Pradesh Praja Party. In addition, a number of figures within the Indian National Congress, such as Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel were conservative.

<i>Namaste Trump</i> 2020 visit of Donald Trump to India

Namaste Trump was a tour event held on 24 and 25 February 2020 in India. It was the inaugural visit of the then US President Donald Trump and his family to India. A rally event of the same name was held in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, and was the highlight of the tour, as a response to the "Howdy Modi" event held in Houston, Texas, in September 2019. The Motera Stadium hosted US President Trump and his family along with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. An attendance of over 100,000 people was reported, with some speculating an attendance as high as 125,000. The tour was originally named "Kem Chho Trump" but was renamed by the Government of India to promote Indian nationalism over regionalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aakar Patel</span> Indian activist and author

Aakar Patel is an Indian journalist, activist and author. He served as the head of Amnesty International in India between 2015 and 2019, and currently serves as the chair of the Board of Amnesty International in India. He is the author of Our Hindu Rashtra, an account of majoritarianism in India, and of Price of the Modi Years, which examines the administrative performance of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In 2014, he authored a translation of Saadat Hasan Manto's Urdu non-fiction Why I Write.

The Bilkis Bano case relates to an attack that took place in the 2002 Gujarat riots, in which a gang of 11 men gang raped a pregnant woman named Bilkis Bano and killed numerous members of her family.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Under what emergency powers has the BBC documentary on PM Modi been blocked?". The Indian Express. 21 January 2023. Archived from the original on 23 January 2023. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "India invokes emergency laws to ban BBC Modi documentary". the Guardian. 23 January 2023. Archived from the original on 23 January 2023. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Lakshman, Sriram (25 January 2023). "BBC documentary | Second part of 'The Modi Question' airs in the U.K." The Hindu. ISSN   0971-751X. Archived from the original on 25 January 2023. Retrieved 25 January 2023.
  4. ↑ "Why India has banned this documentary about its Prime Minister Narendra Modi". SBS News. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  5. ↑ "India government criticises BBC's Modi documentary". BBC News. 20 January 2023. Archived from the original on 23 January 2023. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
  6. ↑ "The Modi Question: Government blocks YouTube videos, tweets sharing BBC documentary on PM Modi". www.dnaindia.com. Archived from the original on 23 January 2023. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "India's government scrambles to block a film about Modi's role in anti-Muslim riots". NPR. 25 January 2023. Archived from the original on 25 January 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Yasir, Samir (25 January 2023). "As India Tries to Block a Modi Documentary, Students Fight to See It". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 26 January 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shih, Gerry (25 January 2023). "Censorship, arrests, power cuts. India scrambles to block BBC documentary". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 28 January 2023. Retrieved 29 January 2023.
  10. 1 2 3 Rajvanshi, Astha (23 January 2023). "Why India Is Using Emergency Laws to Ban a Modi Documentary". Time. Archived from the original on 26 January 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  11. ↑ Bobbio, Tommaso (1 May 2012). "Making Gujarat Vibrant: Hindutva, development and the rise of subnationalism in India". Third World Quarterly. 33 (4): 657–672. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.657423. S2CID   154422056. Archived from the original on 1 March 2020. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  12. ↑ Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future. Harvard University Press. pp. 17–28, 50–51. ISBN   978-0-674-03059-6. JSTOR   27639120.
  13. ↑ Shani, Orrit (2007). Communalism, Caste and Hindu Nationalism: The Violence in Gujarat. Cambridge University Press. pp. 168–173. ISBN   978-0-521-68369-2. Archived from the original on 18 February 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
  14. ↑ Jaffrelot, Christophe (June 2013). "Gujarat Elections: The Sub-Text of Modi's 'Hattrick'—High Tech Populism and the 'Neo-middle Class'". Studies in Indian Politics . 1 (1): 79–95. doi:10.1177/2321023013482789. S2CID   154404089 . Retrieved 29 August 2021.
  15. ↑ "India Gujarat Chief Minister Modi cleared in riots case". BBC News . BBC. 10 April 2012. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 17 February 2017.
  16. ↑ Dasgupta, Manas (10 April 2012). "SIT finds no proof against Modi, says court". The Hindu . Archived from the original on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 17 February 2017.
  17. 1 2 Means, Other (14 February 2023). "Indian Officials Search BBC Offices in Delhi After Modi Documentary". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 15 February 2023. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  18. ↑ Ellis-Petersen, Hannah (14 February 2023). "What is the BBC Modi documentary and why is it so controversial?". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 February 2023. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  19. 1 2 "'Will you ban movie on Godse too?' Owaisi's jibe after govt blocks BBC documentary on PM Modi". India Today. 23 January 2023. Archived from the original on 23 January 2023. Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  20. 1 2 Pahwa, Nitish (25 January 2023). "Narendra Modi's Censorship Has Reached an Alarming New Level". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  21. ↑ Bhattacherjee, Kallol (19 January 2023). "BBC documentary on PM Modi is 'propaganda' and reflects 'colonial mindset', says India". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  22. 1 2 3 Syed, Armani (26 January 2023). "How Indians Are Watching the Banned BBC Modi Documentary". Time. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  23. ↑ Rajvanshi, Astha; Syed, Armani (23 January 2023). "Why India Is Using Emergency Laws to Ban a Modi Documentary". Time. Archived from the original on 25 January 2023. Retrieved 25 January 2023.
  24. ↑ "Why Modi and BJP want the BBC documentary to raise heat and dust". Firstpost. 26 January 2023. Archived from the original on 28 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  25. ↑ "BBC documentary can't undermine India's sovereignty: Shashi Tharoor". The New Indian Express. 26 January 2023. Archived from the original on 28 January 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
  26. ↑ "Supreme Court to hear pleas on BBC documentary row, asks petitioners seeking ban to mention case again". Hindustan Times. 3 February 2023. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  27. ↑ Dasgupta, Sravasti (3 February 2023). "India's top court issues notice to government over banned BBC documentary on Modi". The Independent. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  28. ↑ "Assam passes resolution against BBC docu amid uproar". MorungExpress. IANS. 22 March 2023. Retrieved 23 March 2023.
  29. ↑ "DYFI to screen 'banned' BBC documentary in Thiruvananthapuram, more campuses follow suit". OnManorama. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
  30. ↑ "DYFI screens BBC documentary in Kerala". English.Mathrubhumi. 24 January 2023. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
  31. ↑ Babu, Ramesh (24 January 2023). "Kerala: CPI(M) youth wing DYFI says will screen BBC documentary on PM Modi today". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  32. ↑ "DYFI, SFI, Congress to screen banned BBC documentary on PM Modi in Kerala". News9live. 24 January 2023. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 24 January 2023.
  33. 1 2 "Jamia, JNU: India students angry after screenings of BBC Modi documentary blocked". BBC News. 25 January 2023. Archived from the original on 26 January 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  34. ↑ "Dozen students detained after bid to screen Modi documentary at Jamia campus". The Indian Express. 25 January 2023. Archived from the original on 27 January 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  35. ↑ "AISA screens BBC documentary on PM Modi in Bengaluru, students of various colleges participate". The Indian Express . 30 January 2023. Archived from the original on 3 February 2023. Retrieved 6 February 2023.
  36. ↑ Staff, The Wire (24 May 2023). "'In India, Telling Truth Can Be Crime': Australian Lawmakers, Activists on BBC Documentary on Modi". The Wire . Retrieved 24 May 2023.
  37. 1 2 "Opinion - India's Proud Tradition of a Free Press Is at Risk". The New York Times. 12 February 2023. Archived from the original on 12 February 2023. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  38. ↑ "TMC MPs share link to controversial BBC documentary on PM Modi, say they won't accept 'censorship'". The Indian Express. 22 January 2023. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  39. ↑ "India's Blocking of BBC Documentary Reflects Broader Crackdown". Human Rights Watch. 23 January 2023. Archived from the original on 12 February 2023. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  40. ↑ "Modi BBC Documentary: Over 300 Retired judges, bureaucrats slam broadcaster for its 'unrelenting hostility' towards India and its PM". Free Press Journal. 21 January 2023. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  41. ↑ "More Than 500 Indian Scientists, Academics Slam Govt for Blocking BBC Documentary on Modi". The Wire. 3 February 2023. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  42. 1 2 "BBC India offices searched by income tax officials". BBC News. 14 February 2023. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  43. ↑ "Indian officials search BBC offices for second straight day". AP NEWS. 15 February 2023. Archived from the original on 15 February 2023. Retrieved 15 February 2023.
  44. ↑ Mogul, Manveena Suri,Kunal Sehgal,Rhea (16 February 2023). "Search of BBC offices by Indian government enters third day | CNN Business". CNN. Archived from the original on 16 February 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  45. ↑ Ahmad, Aftab (16 February 2023). "Indian tax inspectors examine mobiles, laptops of BBC employees". Reuters. Archived from the original on 16 February 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
  46. ↑ Das, Krishna N.; Maclellan, Kylie (14 February 2023). "India tax officers search BBC offices weeks after critical Modi documentary". Reuters. Archived from the original on 14 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  47. ↑ "BBC offices raided in India in latest Modi assault on press freedom | RSF". rsf.org. 16 February 2023. Archived from the original on 16 February 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2023.
  48. 1 2 "'India: The Modi Question' – A sharp documentary with some blind spots". Deccan Herald. 27 January 2023. Archived from the original on 29 January 2023. Retrieved 29 January 2023.
  49. ↑ Katakam, Anupama (3 February 2023). "Christophe Jaffrelot on 2002 Gujarat riots: 'The ghosts have never left me'". Frontline. Archived from the original on 6 February 2023. Retrieved 6 February 2023.
  50. 1 2 3 4 Laul, Revati (28 January 2023). "Opinion: BBC's 'The Modi Question' played it safe, failed in many ways". The News Minute. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  51. 1 2 3 Joshi, Ruchir (24 January 2023). "Lingering shadow". Telegraph India. Archived from the original on 5 February 2023. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.