Proto-Indo-European pronouns

Last updated

Proto-Indo-European pronouns have been reconstructed by modern linguists, based on similarities found across all Indo-European languages. This article lists and discusses the hypothesised forms.

Contents

Proto-Indo-European (PIE) pronouns, especially demonstrative pronouns, are difficult to reconstruct because of their variety in later languages.

Grammatical categories

PIE pronouns inflected for case and number, and partly for gender. For more information on these categories, see the article on Proto-Indo-European nominals.

Personal pronouns

PIE had personal pronouns in the first and second person, but not the third person, where demonstratives were used instead. They were inflected for case and number (singular, dual, and plural), but not for gender. The personal pronouns had their own unique forms and endings, and some had two distinct stems; this is most obvious in the first person singular, where the two stems are still preserved, as for instance in English I and me. There were also two varieties for the accusative, genitive and dative cases, a stressed and an enclitic form. Many of the special pronominal endings were later borrowed as nominal endings.

The following tables give the paradigms as reconstructed by Beekes [1] and by Sihler. [2]

Beekes' reconstruction of PIE personal pronouns
First personSecond person
SingularPluralSingularPlural
Nominative *h₁eǵ(oH/Hom)*uei*tuH*iuH
Accusative stressed*h₁mé*nsmé*tué*usmé
enclitic*h₁me*nōs*te*uōs
Genitive stressed*h₁méne*ns(er)o-*teue*ius(er)o-
enclitic*h₁moi*nos*toi*uos
Dative stressed*h₁méǵʰio*nsmei*tébʰio*usmei
enclitic*h₁moi*ns*toi?
Instrumental *h₁moí?*toí?
Ablative *h₁med*nsmed*tued*usmed
Locative *h₁moí*nsmi*toí*usmi
Sihler's reconstruction of PIE personal pronouns
First personSecond person
SingularDualPluralSingularDualPlural
Nominative*eǵoH*weh₁*we-i*tī̆ (*tū̆)*yuh₁ (*yūh₁?)*yūs (*yuHs?)
Accusativetonic*m-mé (> *mé)*n̥h₁-wé*n̥smé*twé*uh₁-wé*usmé
enclitic*me*nō̆h₁*nō̆s*te*wō̆h₁*wō̆s
Genitivetonic*mé-me*n̥sóm*té-we*usóm
enclitic*mos (adj.)*nō̆s*tos (adj.)*wō̆s
Dativetonic*mébhi*n̥sm-éy*tébhi*usm-éy
enclitic*mey, *moy?*nō̆s*tey, *toy*wō̆s
Ablative*mm-ét (> *mét)*n̥sm-ét*tw-ét*usm-ét

Other reconstructions typically differ only slightly from Beekes and Sihler (see for example Fortson 2004 [3] ).

Demonstrative pronouns

As for demonstratives, Beekes [4] tentatively reconstructs a system with only two pronouns: *so "this, that" and *h₁e "the (just named)" (anaphoric, reconstructed as *ei- by Fortson [5] ). He gives the following paradigms:

Demonstrative pronouns (Beekes)
SingularPlural
MasculineNeuterFeminineMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominative *so*tod*seh₂*toi*teh₂*seh₂i??
Accusative *tóm*teh₂m*tons*teh₂ns
Genitive *(to)sio*(t)eseh₂s*tesom?*tesom?
Ablative *tosmōd*toios?
Dative *tosmōi*tesieh₂ei*toimus*teh₂mus?
Locative *tosmi*tesieh₂i*toisu*teh₂su?
Instrumental *toi?*toi?*toibʰi*teh₂bʰi?
Nominative*h₁e*(h₁)id*(h₁)ih₂*h₁ei*ih₂*ih₂es
Accusative*im*ih₂m*ins*ih₂ns
Genitive*h₁éso*h₁eseh₂s?*h₁es(om)
Ablative*h₁esmōd*h₁eios?
Dative*h₁esmōi*h₁esieh₂ei*h₁eimus
Locative*h₁esmi*h₁esieh₂i*h₁eisu
Instrumental*h₁ei?*h₁eibʰi

Beekes also postulates three adverbial particles, from which demonstratives were constructed in various later languages:

Demonstrative pronouns (Sihler)
SingularPlural
MasculineNeuterFeminineMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominative *so*tod*seh₂, *sih₂*toy*teh₂*teh₂s
Accusative *tom*teh₂m*toms*teh₂ms
Genitive *tosyo*tosyeh₂s*toysō̆m*teh₂sō̆m
Ablative *tosmōd*tosyeh₂s*toybʰ-*teh₂bʰ-
Dative *tosmey*tosyeh₂ey*toybʰ-*teh₂bʰ-
Locative *tosmi?*toysu*teh₂su
Instrumental ????
Nominative*is*id*ih₂*eyes*ih₂*ih₂es
Accusative*im*ih₂m*ins*ih₂ms
Genitive*esyo*esyeh₂s*eysom
Ablative*esmod*esyeh₂s*eybʰ-
Dative*esmey*esyeh₂ey*eybʰ-
Locative*esmi?*eysu
Instrumental??

Reflexive pronoun

A third-person reflexive pronoun *s(w)e-, parallel to the first and second person singular personal pronouns, also existed, though it lacked a nominative form:

Reflexive pronoun (Beekes) [6]
Accusative*se
Genitive*seue, *sei
Dative*sebʰio, *soi

Relative pronoun

PIE had a relative pronoun with the stem *(H)yo-. [7]

Interrogative/indefinite pronoun

There was also a pronoun with the stem *kʷe- / *kʷi- (adjectival *kʷo-) used both as an interrogative and an indefinite pronoun. [5] [8]

Interrogative pronoun (Sihler [9] )
PronominalAdjectival
SingularPluralSingularPlural
Masc./Fem.NeuterMasc./Fem.NeuterMasculineNeuterFeminineMasculineNeuterFeminine
Nominative*kʷis*kʷid*kʷeyes*kʷih₂*kʷos*kʷod*kʷeh₂*kʷoy*kʷeh₂*kʷeh₂(e)s
Accusative*kʷim*kʷims*kʷom*kʷeh₂m*kʷoms*kʷeh₂ms
Dative*kʷesmey*kʷeybh-*kʷosmey ? ?
Genitive*kʷesyo*kʷeysom*kʷosyo ? ?
Locative*kʷesmi*kʷeysu ? ? ?

Pronominal adjectives

Proto-Indo-European possessed few adjectives that had a distinct set of endings, identical to those of the demonstrative pronoun above but differing from those of regular adjectives. [10] They included at least *ályos "other, another" [5] (or *h₂élyos?).

Reflexes

Reflexes, or descendants of the PIE reconstructed forms in its daughter languages, include the following.

TypeReconstructionReflexes
1st sg. nom.*eǵoH Hitt. ūk, Ved. ahám, Av. azəm, Gk. ἐγω(ν), Lat. ego, Goth. ik, [11]

Eng. I, Gm. ich, Du. ik, Alb. u-në, Bulg. аз\az, Russ. я\ja,

Kamviri õc, Carian uk, Osset. æz/æz, Umb. eho, ON ek, Lith. aš, Venet. ego[ citation needed ]

1st sg. oblique *me Ved. mām, Av. mąm, Gk. ἐμέ, Lat. mē, [11]

Eng. mec/me, Gm. mih/mich, Du. mij,

Osset./Pers. mæn, Umb. mehe, Ir. mé, Welsh mi, Russ. mne, Alb. mua, Venet. mego[ citation needed ]

1st pl. nom.*we-i Hitt. wēš, Ved. vayám, Av. vaēm, Goth. wit (dual), weis, Toch. was/wes, [11]

Eng. we, Gm. wir, Du. wij,

Pers. vayam/?, ON vér, Lith. vedu[ citation needed ]

1st pl. oblique*nō̆s Hitt. anzāš, Gk. νώ (dual), Lat. nōs, Goth. uns, Toch. ñäś (sg.), [11]

Gm. uns, Eng. us, Du. ons,

Skr. nas, Av. nō, Pers. amaxām/?, ON oss, okkr, Old Ir. ni, Welsh ni, OPruss. noūson, Lith. nuodu, Pol., Russ. nas, Alb. ne[ citation needed ]

2nd sg.*tī̆ (*tū̆) / *te Hitt. zīk, Ved. tvám, Av. tū, Gk. σύ, Doric τύ, Lat. tū, Goth. þu, Toch. tu/tuwe, OCS ty [12]

Gm. du, Eng. thou,

Pers. tuva/to, Osset. dy, Kashmiri tsū', Kamviri tü, Umb. tu, tui, Osc. tuvai, ON þú, Ir. tú/thú, Welsh ti, Arm. tu/du, OPruss. toū, Pol. ty, Russ. ty, Lith. tu, Ltv. tu, Alb. ti[ citation needed ]

2nd pl. nom.*yū(H)s Ved. yūyám, Av. yūš, Gk. ὑμεῖς, Goth. jūs, Toch. yas/yes, [12]

Eng. gē/ye; ēow/you, Gm. ir/ihr, Du. jij / gij,

ON ykkr, yðr, Arm. dzez/dzez/cez, OPruss. ioūs, Lith. jūs, Ltv. jūs, Alb. juve, ju[ citation needed ]

2nd pl. oblique*wō̆s Lat. vōs, [12]

Skr. vas, Av. vō, Umb. uestra, OPruss. wans, Pol. wy, was, Russ. vy, vas,[ citation needed ] Alb. u

Demonstrative ("this, that")*so (m), *se-h₂ (f), *to-d (n) Ved. sá, sā, tád, Av. hō, hā, tat̰, Gk. ὁ, ἡ, τό, Goth. sa, so, þata, Icel. sá, sú, það, TochB. se, sā, te [5]

Old Eng. se, seo, thæt, Russ. tot, ta, to[ citation needed ]

Demonstrative ("the just named; this")*h₁e / *ei- Ved. ay-ám, id-ám, Av. īm "him", Lat. is, ea, id, Alb. aì (he, that), ajò (she, that), Goth. is "he" [5]

Skr. it[ citation needed ]

Demonstrative / adverbial particle*ḱi(-) Lat. cis, Eng. he, Gm. heute "on this day, today", OCS sĭ, Lith. šìs, [5]

ON hér, Goth. hita, Eng. it, Gm. hier, Russ. sije[ citation needed ]

Reflexive*s(w)e- Ved. sva-yám, Av. xᵛāi, Gk. ἑ-, Lat. sē, sibi, suus, Old Ir. fa(-dessin), Ir. féin, OCS sę, [5]

Gm. sih/sich, sin/sein, Du. zich, zijn

Carian sfes, Lyd. śfa-, Osc. sífeí, Umb. seso, ON sik, sinn, Goth. sik, Arm. ink῾s, OPruss. sien, sin, Lith. savo, Latv. sevi, Russ. sebe, -sja, Alb. vetë, u, Phryg. ve[ citation needed ]

Relative*(H)yo- Ved. yá-, Av. ya-, Gk. ὅ-, Proto-Celtic *yo- [5]
Interrogative pronoun*kʷi-s (m, f), *kʷi-d (n) Hitt. kuiš, Luw. kuiš, Gk. τίς, Lat. quis, quid, Ir. cia, Eng. hwī/–, OCS čĭto [5]

Lyc. tike, Lyd. qi-, Osset. či, Pers. čiy/ki, Osc. pisi, Umb. púí, svepis, ON hverr, Welsh pwi,[ citation needed ] Russ. kto, čto, Alb. çë

Interrogative adjective*kʷo-s (m), *kʷe-h₂ (f), *kʷo-d (n) Ved. kás, Av. kō, Gk. ποῦ "where?", pōs "somehow", Goth. ƕas, Lith. kàs, OCS kŭto [5]

Eng. hwā/who; hwæt/what, Gm. hwër/wer, Du. wie / wat,

Carian kuo, Kashmiri kus, Kamviri kâča, Lat. qui, quae, quod; Arm. ov, inč῾, Toch. kus/kŭse, Ltv. kas, Pol. kto, Russ. kto, Alb. ku, kush, Phryg. kos[ citation needed ]

"(an)other"*alyo- Gk. ἄλλος, Lat. alius, Goth. aljis, Ir. ail/eile, Toch. ālak/alyek, [5]

Gm. eli-lenti "in another land, expelled" / elend "miserable, wretched", [13] Eng. elles/else,

Lyd. aλaś, Skr. araṇa, Osc. allo, ON elligar, Gaul. alla, Arm. ayl[ citation needed ]

In the following languages, two reflexes separated by a slash mean:

Notes

  1. Beekes (2011 :233)
  2. Sihler (1995 :389)
  3. Fortson (2004 :127–9)
  4. Beekes (2011 :228–229)
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Fortson (2004 :130)
  6. Beekes (2011 :234–235)
  7. Sihler (1995 :&#91, page needed &#93, )
  8. Sihler (1995 :397)
  9. Sihler (1995 :397–398)
  10. Ringe (2006)
  11. 1 2 3 4 Fortson (2004 :127)
  12. 1 2 3 Fortson (2004 :128)
  13. Grebe (1963 :134)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tocharian languages</span> Extinct Indo-European languages in Asia

The Tocharianlanguages, also known as Arśi-Kuči, Agnean-Kuchean or Kuchean-Agnean, are an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family spoken by inhabitants of the Tarim Basin, the Tocharians. The languages are known from manuscripts dating from the 5th to the 8th century AD, which were found in oasis cities on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin and the Lop Desert. The discovery of these languages in the early 20th century contradicted the formerly prevalent idea of an east–west division of the Indo-European language family as centum and satem languages, and prompted reinvigorated study of the Indo-European family. Scholars studying these manuscripts in the early 20th century identified their authors with the Tokharoi, a name used in ancient sources for people of Bactria (Tokharistan). Although this identification is now believed to be mistaken, "Tocharian" remains the usual term for these languages.

The laryngeal theory is a theory in the historical linguistics of the Indo-European languages positing that:

In Indo-European studies, a thematic vowel or theme vowel is the vowel *e or *o from ablaut placed before the ending of a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) word. Nouns, adjectives, and verbs in the Indo-European languages with this vowel are thematic, and those without it are athematic. Used more generally, a thematic vowel is any vowel found at the end of the stem of a word.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Germanic language</span> Ancestor of the Germanic languages

Proto-Germanic is the reconstructed proto-language of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Indo-European language</span> Ancestor of the Indo-European languages

Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European language family. No direct record of Proto-Indo-European exists; its proposed features have been derived by linguistic reconstruction from documented Indo-European languages.

Proto-Indo-European verbs reflect a complex system of morphology, more complicated than the substantive, with verbs categorized according to their aspect, using multiple grammatical moods and voices, and being conjugated according to person, number and tense. In addition to finite forms thus formed, non-finite forms such as participles are also extensively used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Celtic language</span> Ancestor of the Celtic languages

Proto-Celtic, or Common Celtic, is the ancestral proto-language of all known Celtic languages, and a descendant of Proto-Indo-European. It is not attested in writing but has been partly reconstructed through the comparative method. Proto-Celtic is generally thought to have been spoken between 1300 and 800 BC, after which it began to split into different languages. Proto-Celtic is often associated with the Urnfield culture and particularly with the Hallstatt culture. Celtic languages share common features with Italic languages that are not found in other branches of Indo-European, suggesting the possibility of an earlier Italo-Celtic linguistic unity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Baltic language</span>

Proto-Baltic is the unattested, reconstructed ancestral proto-language of all Baltic languages. It is not attested in writing, but has been partly reconstructed through the comparative method by gathering the collected data on attested Baltic and other Indo-European languages. It represents the common Baltic speech that approximately was spoken between the 3rd millennium BC and ca. 5th century BC, after which it began dividing into West and East Baltic languages. Proto-Baltic is thought to have been a fusional language and is associated with the Corded Ware and Trzciniec cultures.

<i>Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben</i> Etymological dictionary

The Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben is an etymological dictionary of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) verb. The first edition appeared in 1998, edited by Helmut Rix. A second edition followed in 2001. The book may be seen as an update to the verb entries of the Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW) by Julius Pokorny. It was the first dictionary fully utilizing the modern three-laryngeal theory with reconstructions of Indo-European verbal roots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Indo-Iranian language</span> Reconstructed proto-language

Proto-Indo-Iranian, also called Proto-Indo-Iranic or Proto-Aryan, is the reconstructed proto-language of the Indo-Iranic branch of Indo-European. Its speakers, the hypothetical Proto-Indo-Iranians, are assumed to have lived in the late 3rd millennium BC, and are often connected with the Sintashta culture of the Eurasian Steppe and the early Andronovo archaeological horizon.

The numerals and derived numbers of the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) have been reconstructed by modern linguists based on similarities found across all Indo-European languages. The following article lists and discusses their hypothesized forms.

Proto-Indo-European nominals include nouns, adjectives, and pronouns. Their grammatical forms and meanings have been reconstructed by modern linguists, based on similarities found across all Indo-European languages. This article discusses nouns and adjectives; Proto-Indo-European pronouns are treated elsewhere.

The phonology of the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) has been reconstructed by linguists, based on the similarities and differences among current and extinct Indo-European languages. Because PIE was not written, linguists must rely on the evidence of its earliest attested descendants, such as Hittite, Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, and Latin, to reconstruct its phonology.

The roots of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) are basic parts of words that carry a lexical meaning, so-called morphemes. PIE roots usually have verbal meaning like "to eat" or "to run". Roots never occurred alone in the language. Complete inflected verbs, nouns, and adjectives were formed by adding further morphemes to a root and potentially changing the root's vowel in a process called ablaut.

The particles of the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) have been reconstructed by modern linguists based on similarities found across all Indo-European languages.

Sanskrit has inherited from its reconstructed parent the Proto-Indo-European language an elaborate system of nominal morphology. Endings may be added directly to the root, or more frequently and especially in the later language, to a stem formed by the addition of a suffix to it.

Osthoff's law is an Indo-European sound law which states that long vowels shorten when followed by a resonant, followed in turn by another consonant. It is named after German Indo-Europeanist Hermann Osthoff, who first formulated it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Tocharian language</span> Reconstructed proto-language

Proto-Tocharian, also spelled Proto-Tokharian, is the reconstructed proto-language of the extinct Tocharian branch of the Indo-European languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Italic language</span> Ancestor of Latin and other Italic languages

The Proto-Italic language is the ancestor of the Italic languages, most notably Latin and its descendants, the Romance languages. It is not directly attested in writing, but has been reconstructed to some degree through the comparative method. Proto-Italic descended from the earlier Proto-Indo-European language.

Historical linguistics has made tentative postulations about and multiple varyingly different reconstructions of Proto-Germanic grammar, as inherited from Proto-Indo-European grammar. All reconstructed forms are marked with an asterisk (*).

References