Supercompact cardinal

Last updated

In set theory, a supercompact cardinal is a type of large cardinal independently introduced by Solovay and Reinhardt. [1] They display a variety of reflection properties.

Contents

Formal definition

If is any ordinal, is -supercompact means that there exists an elementary embedding from the universe into a transitive inner model with critical point , and

That is, contains all of its -sequences. Then is supercompact means that it is -supercompact for all ordinals .

Alternatively, an uncountable cardinal is supercompact if for every such that there exists a normal measure over , in the following sense.

is defined as follows:

.

An ultrafilter over is fine if it is -complete and , for every . A normal measure over is a fine ultrafilter over with the additional property that every function such that is constant on a set in . Here "constant on a set in " means that there is such that .

Properties

Supercompact cardinals have reflection properties. If a cardinal with some property (say a 3-huge cardinal) that is witnessed by a structure of limited rank exists above a supercompact cardinal , then a cardinal with that property exists below . For example, if is supercompact and the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH) holds below then it holds everywhere because a bijection between the powerset of and a cardinal at least would be a witness of limited rank for the failure of GCH at so it would also have to exist below .

Finding a canonical inner model for supercompact cardinals is one of the major problems of inner model theory.

The least supercompact cardinal is the least such that for every structure with cardinality of the domain , and for every sentence such that , there exists a substructure with smaller domain (i.e. ) that satisfies . [2]

Supercompactness has a combinatorial characterization similar to the property of being ineffable. Let be the set of all nonempty subsets of which have cardinality . A cardinal is supercompact iff for every set (equivalently every cardinal ), for every function , if for all , then there is some such that is stationary. [3]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cardinal number</span> Size of a possibly infinite set

In mathematics, a cardinal number, or cardinal for short, is what is commonly called the number of elements of a set. In the case of a finite set, its cardinal number, or cardinality is therefore a natural number. For dealing with the case of infinite sets, the infinite cardinal numbers have been introduced, which are often denoted with the Hebrew letter (aleph) marked with subscript indicating their rank among the infinite cardinals.

In mathematics, a Mahlo cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number. Mahlo cardinals were first described by Paul Mahlo. As with all large cardinals, none of these varieties of Mahlo cardinals can be proven to exist by ZFC.

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, a Q-indescribable cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number that is hard to axiomatize in some language Q. There are many different types of indescribable cardinals corresponding to different choices of languages Q. They were introduced by Hanf & Scott (1961).

In mathematics, a measurable cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number. In order to define the concept, one introduces a two-valued measure on a cardinal κ, or more generally on any set. For a cardinal κ, it can be described as a subdivision of all of its subsets into large and small sets such that κ itself is large, and all singletons {α}, ακ are small, complements of small sets are large and vice versa. The intersection of fewer than κ large sets is again large.

In set theory, a strong cardinal is a type of large cardinal. It is a weakening of the notion of a supercompact cardinal.

In set theory, a Woodin cardinal is a cardinal number such that for all functions , there exists a cardinal with and an elementary embedding from the Von Neumann universe into a transitive inner model with critical point and .

In mathematics, a cardinal number is called huge if there exists an elementary embedding from into a transitive inner model with critical point and

In mathematics, a weakly compact cardinal is a certain kind of cardinal number introduced by Erdős & Tarski (1961); weakly compact cardinals are large cardinals, meaning that their existence cannot be proven from the standard axioms of set theory.

In mathematics, extendible cardinals are large cardinals introduced by Reinhardt (1974), who was partly motivated by reflection principles. Intuitively, such a cardinal represents a point beyond which initial pieces of the universe of sets start to look similar, in the sense that each is elementarily embeddable into a later one.

In mathematical logic, the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem is a theorem on the existence and cardinality of models, named after Leopold Löwenheim and Thoralf Skolem.

In mathematics, in set theory, the constructible universe, denoted by , is a particular class of sets that can be described entirely in terms of simpler sets. is the union of the constructible hierarchy. It was introduced by Kurt Gödel in his 1938 paper "The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalized Continuum-Hypothesis". In this paper, he proved that the constructible universe is an inner model of ZF set theory, and also that the axiom of choice and the generalized continuum hypothesis are true in the constructible universe. This shows that both propositions are consistent with the basic axioms of set theory, if ZF itself is consistent. Since many other theorems only hold in systems in which one or both of the propositions is true, their consistency is an important result.

In mathematics, particularly in mathematical logic and set theory, a club set is a subset of a limit ordinal that is closed under the order topology, and is unbounded relative to the limit ordinal. The name club is a contraction of "closed and unbounded".

In mathematics, specifically set theory and model theory, a stationary set is a set that is not too small in the sense that it intersects all club sets and is analogous to a set of non-zero measure in measure theory. There are at least three closely related notions of stationary set, depending on whether one is looking at subsets of an ordinal, or subsets of something of given cardinality, or a powerset.

In theoretical physics, a source field is a background field coupled to the original field as

In mathematics, the Jack function is a generalization of the Jack polynomial, introduced by Henry Jack. The Jack polynomial is a homogeneous, symmetric polynomial which generalizes the Schur and zonal polynomials, and is in turn generalized by the Heckman–Opdam polynomials and Macdonald polynomials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution</span> Probability distribution

In probability theory and statistics, the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution is a discrete probability distribution named after Richard W. Conway, William L. Maxwell, and Siméon Denis Poisson that generalizes the Poisson distribution by adding a parameter to model overdispersion and underdispersion. It is a member of the exponential family, has the Poisson distribution and geometric distribution as special cases and the Bernoulli distribution as a limiting case.

In mathematics, lifting theory was first introduced by John von Neumann in a pioneering paper from 1931, in which he answered a question raised by Alfréd Haar. The theory was further developed by Dorothy Maharam (1958) and by Alexandra Ionescu Tulcea and Cassius Ionescu Tulcea (1961). Lifting theory was motivated to a large extent by its striking applications. Its development up to 1969 was described in a monograph of the Ionescu Tulceas. Lifting theory continued to develop since then, yielding new results and applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultrafilter on a set</span> Maximal proper filter

In the mathematical field of set theory, an ultrafilter on a set is a maximal filter on the set In other words, it is a collection of subsets of that satisfies the definition of a filter on and that is maximal with respect to inclusion, in the sense that there does not exist a strictly larger collection of subsets of that is also a filter. Equivalently, an ultrafilter on the set can also be characterized as a filter on with the property that for every subset of either or its complement belongs to the ultrafilter.

References

Citations

  1. A. Kanamori, "Kunen and set theory", pp.2450--2451. Topology and its Applications, vol. 158 (2011).
  2. Magidor, M. (1971). "On the Role of Supercompact and Extendible Cardinals in Logic". Israel Journal of Mathematics . 10 (2): 147–157. doi:10.1007/BF02771565.
  3. M. Magidor, Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals, pp.281--282. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 42 no. 1, 1974.