Teaching quantum mechanics

Last updated

Quantum mechanics is a difficult subject to teach due to its counterintuitive nature. [1] As the subject is now offered by advanced secondary schools, educators have applied scientific methodology to the process of teaching quantum mechanics, in order to identify common misconceptions and ways of improving students' understanding.

Contents

Common learning difficulties

Students' misconceptions range from fully classical physics thinking, mixed models, to quasi-quantum ideas. [1] For example, if the concept that quantum mechanics does not describe a path for electrons or photons is misunderstood, students may believe that they follow specific trajectories (classical), or sinusoidal paths (mixes), or are simultaneously wave and particles (quasi-quantum: "in which students understand that quantum objects can behave as both particles and waves, but still have difficulty describing events in a nondeterministic way"). Among the concepts most often misunderstood are:

Issues also arise from misunderstanding classical concepts related to quantum concepts, such as the difference between light energy and light intensity.

Teaching strategies

Mathematics

Quantum mechanics can be taught with a focus on different interpretations, different models, or via mathematical techniques. Studies have shown that focus on non-mathematical concepts can lead to adequate understanding. [6]

Digital and multi-media

Despite the fundamental impossibility of directly viewing quantum states, multimedia visualizations are an important tool in education. Interactive media provides an alternative experience beyond everyday personal experience as a tool for understanding quantum mechanics. [2] Among the multimedia sites that have been studied with positive results are QuVis [7] and Phet. [8]

History and philosophy of science as educational guides

In introducing history as part of the process of teaching quantum mechanics sets up a potential conflict of goals: accurate history or pedagogical clarity. [9] Studies have shown that teaching through history helps students recognize that the counterintuitive issues are fundamental rather than simply something they don't understand. Specifically discussing the historical debates on quantum concepts drives home the idea the quantum differs from classical. [2] Discussing the philosophy of science introduces the idea that language derived from everyday experience limits our ability to describe quantum phenomena.

Directly discussing the meanings of words

Mohan [10] analyzes two widely used representative quantum mechanics textbooks against the learning challenges reported by Krijtenburg-Lewerissa [1] and others. Both texts adopt language ('waves' and 'particles') familiar to students in other contexts without directly exploring the significant shifts in meaning required by quantum mechanics. Mohan attributes some of the learning challenges to this unexplored application of inappropriate language.

Teaching for quantum computing

N. David Mermin reports that an unconventional strategy based on abstract but simple math concepts is sufficient to teach quantum mechanics to students interested in quantum computing application rather than physics. [11] Many of the issues that confound students of physics to not apply to this case and the mathematical background of quantum computing resembles the background already taught in computer science. Mermin develops notation and operations with classical bits then introduces quantum bits as superpositions of two classical states. He never needs to discuss even Planck's constant, which he suggests is important for quantum computer hardware but not software.

Teaching based on quantum optics

Philipp Blitzenbauer engages students through simple but intrinsically quantum single-photon experiments. [12] The approach avoids the ambiguous classical vs quantum character of photons in optical interference experiments like the double slit. Students exposed to quantum mechanics in this way avoid developing misconceptions apparent among students in the control group.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Whether the apparent nondeterminism of quantum mechanics is truly fundamental depends on the interpretation. [4] [5]

Related Research Articles

The Copenhagen interpretation is a collection of views about the meaning of quantum mechanics, stemming from the work of Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, and others. The term "Copenhagen interpretation" was apparently coined by Heisenberg during the 1950s to refer to ideas developed in the 1925–1927 period, glossing over his disagreements with Bohr. Consequently, there is no definitive historical statement of what the interpretation entails.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Double-slit experiment</span> Physics experiment, showing light and matter can be modelled by both waves and particles

In modern physics, the double-slit experiment demonstrates that light and matter can satisfy the seemingly incongruous classical definitions for both waves and particles. This ambiguity is considered evidence for the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics. This type of experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave behavior of visible light. In 1927, Davisson and Germer and, independently George Paget Thomson and his research student Alexander Reid demonstrated that electrons show the same behavior, which was later extended to atoms and molecules. Thomas Young's experiment with light was part of classical physics long before the development of quantum mechanics and the concept of wave–particle duality. He believed it demonstrated that Christiaan Huygens' wave theory of light was correct, and his experiment is sometimes referred to as Young's experiment or Young's slits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum entanglement</span> Correlation between quantum systems

Quantum entanglement is the phenomenon of a duet of particles being generated, interacting, or sharing spatial proximity in such a way that the quantum state of each particle of the group cannot be described independently of the state of the others, including when the particles are separated by a large distance. The topic of quantum entanglement is at the heart of the disparity between classical and quantum physics: entanglement is a primary feature of quantum mechanics not present in classical mechanics.

Wave–particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that quantum entities exhibit particle or wave properties according to the experimental circumstances. It expresses the inability of the classical concepts such as particle or wave to fully describe the behavior of quantum objects. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, light was found to behave as a wave, and then later discovered to have a particulate character, whereas electrons were found to act as particles, and then later discovered to have wavelike aspects. The concept of duality arose to name these contradictions.

An interpretation of quantum mechanics is an attempt to explain how the mathematical theory of quantum mechanics might correspond to experienced reality. Although quantum mechanics has held up to rigorous and extremely precise tests in an extraordinarily broad range of experiments, there exist a number of contending schools of thought over their interpretation. These views on interpretation differ on such fundamental questions as whether quantum mechanics is deterministic or stochastic, local or non-local, which elements of quantum mechanics can be considered real, and what the nature of measurement is, among other matters.

Newton's laws of motion are three laws that describe the relationship between the motion of an object and the forces acting on it. These laws, which provide the basis for Newtonian mechanics, can be paraphrased as follows:

  1. A body remains at rest, or in motion at a constant speed in a straight line, except insofar as it is acted upon by a force.
  2. The net force on a body is equal to the body's instantaneous acceleration multiplied by its instantaneous mass or, equivalently, the rate at which the body's momentum changes with time.
  3. If two bodies exert forces on each other, these forces have the same magnitude but opposite directions.

Bell's theorem is a term encompassing a number of closely related results in physics, all of which determine that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden-variable theories, given some basic assumptions about the nature of measurement. "Local" here refers to the principle of locality, the idea that a particle can only be influenced by its immediate surroundings, and that interactions mediated by physical fields cannot propagate faster than the speed of light. "Hidden variables" are putative properties of quantum particles that are not included in quantum theory but nevertheless affect the outcome of experiments. In the words of physicist John Stewart Bell, for whom this family of results is named, "If [a hidden-variable theory] is local it will not agree with quantum mechanics, and if it agrees with quantum mechanics it will not be local."

In quantum physics, a measurement is the testing or manipulation of a physical system to yield a numerical result. A fundamental feature of quantum theory is that the predictions it makes are probabilistic. The procedure for finding a probability involves combining a quantum state, which mathematically describes a quantum system, with a mathematical representation of the measurement to be performed on that system. The formula for this calculation is known as the Born rule. For example, a quantum particle like an electron can be described by a quantum state that associates to each point in space a complex number called a probability amplitude. Applying the Born rule to these amplitudes gives the probabilities that the electron will be found in one region or another when an experiment is performed to locate it. This is the best the theory can do; it cannot say for certain where the electron will be found. The same quantum state can also be used to make a prediction of how the electron will be moving, if an experiment is performed to measure its momentum instead of its position. The uncertainty principle implies that, whatever the quantum state, the range of predictions for the electron's position and the range of predictions for its momentum cannot both be narrow. Some quantum states imply a near-certain prediction of the result of a position measurement, but the result of a momentum measurement will be highly unpredictable, and vice versa. Furthermore, the fact that nature violates the statistical conditions known as Bell inequalities indicates that the unpredictability of quantum measurement results cannot be explained away as due to ignorance about "local hidden variables" within quantum systems.

In quantum mechanics, the measurement problem is the problem of how, or whether, wave function collapse occurs. The inability to observe such a collapse directly has given rise to different interpretations of quantum mechanics and poses a key set of questions that each interpretation must answer.

A concept inventory is a criterion-referenced test designed to help determine whether a student has an accurate working knowledge of a specific set of concepts. Historically, concept inventories have been in the form of multiple-choice tests in order to aid interpretability and facilitate administration in large classes. Unlike a typical, teacher-authored multiple-choice test, questions and response choices on concept inventories are the subject of extensive research. The aims of the research include ascertaining (a) the range of what individuals think a particular question is asking and (b) the most common responses to the questions. Concept inventories are evaluated to ensure test reliability and validity. In its final form, each question includes one correct answer and several distractors.

In physics, thermalisation is the process of physical bodies reaching thermal equilibrium through mutual interaction. In general, the natural tendency of a system is towards a state of equipartition of energy and uniform temperature that maximizes the system's entropy. Thermalisation, thermal equilibrium, and temperature are therefore important fundamental concepts within statistical physics, statistical mechanics, and thermodynamics; all of which are a basis for many other specific fields of scientific understanding and engineering application.

Quantum mechanics is the study of matter and its interactions with energy on the scale of atomic and subatomic particles. By contrast, classical physics explains matter and energy only on a scale familiar to human experience, including the behavior of astronomical bodies such as the moon. Classical physics is still used in much of modern science and technology. However, towards the end of the 19th century, scientists discovered phenomena in both the large (macro) and the small (micro) worlds that classical physics could not explain. The desire to resolve inconsistencies between observed phenomena and classical theory led to a revolution in physics, a shift in the original scientific paradigm: the development of quantum mechanics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">N. David Mermin</span> American physicist

Nathaniel David Mermin is a solid-state physicist at Cornell University best known for the eponymous Hohenberg–Mermin–Wagner theorem, his application of the term "boojum" to superfluidity, his textbook with Neil Ashcroft on solid-state physics, and for contributions to the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum Bayesianism</span> Interpretation of quantum mechanics

In physics and the philosophy of physics, quantum Bayesianism is a collection of related approaches to the interpretation of quantum mechanics, the most prominent of which is QBism. QBism is an interpretation that takes an agent's actions and experiences as the central concerns of the theory. QBism deals with common questions in the interpretation of quantum theory about the nature of wavefunction superposition, quantum measurement, and entanglement. According to QBism, many, but not all, aspects of the quantum formalism are subjective in nature. For example, in this interpretation, a quantum state is not an element of reality—instead, it represents the degrees of belief an agent has about the possible outcomes of measurements. For this reason, some philosophers of science have deemed QBism a form of anti-realism. The originators of the interpretation disagree with this characterization, proposing instead that the theory more properly aligns with a kind of realism they call "participatory realism", wherein reality consists of more than can be captured by any putative third-person account of it.

Physics education research (PER) is a form of discipline-based education research specifically related to the study of the teaching and learning of physics, often with the aim of improving the effectiveness of student learning. PER draws from other disciplines, such as sociology, cognitive science, education and linguistics, and complements them by reflecting the disciplinary knowledge and practices of physics. Approximately eighty-five institutions in the United States conduct research in science and physics education.

<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i> Textbook by scientists Michael Nielsen and Isaac Chuang

Quantum Computation and Quantum Information is a textbook about quantum information science written by Michael Nielsen and Isaac Chuang, regarded as a standard text on the subject. It is informally known as "Mike and Ike", after the candies of that name. The book assumes minimal prior experience with quantum mechanics and with computer science, aiming instead to be a self-contained introduction to the relevant features of both. The focus of the text is on theory, rather than the experimental implementations of quantum computers, which are discussed more briefly.

Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods is a 1993 quantum physics textbook by Israeli physicist Asher Peres. Well-regarded among the physics community, it is known for unconventional choices of topics to include.

<i>Modern Quantum Mechanics</i> Physics textbook

Modern Quantum Mechanics, often called Sakurai or Sakurai and Napolitano, is a standard graduate-level quantum mechanics textbook written originally by J. J. Sakurai and edited by San Fu Tuan in 1985, with later editions coauthored by Jim Napolitano. Sakurai died in 1982 before he could finish the textbook and both the first edition of the book, published in 1985 by Benjamin Cummings, and the revised edition of 1994, published by Addison-Wesley, were edited and completed by Tuan posthumously. The book was updated by Napolitano and released two later editions. The second edition was initially published by Addison-Wesley in 2010 and rereleased as an eBook by Cambridge University Press, who released a third edition in 2020.

Quantum engineering is the development of technology that capitalizes on the laws of quantum mechanics. Quantum engineering uses quantum mechanics as a toolbox for the development of quantum technologies, such as quantum sensors or quantum computers.

In physics, Mermin's device or Mermin's machine is a thought experiment intended to illustrate the non-classical features of nature without making a direct reference to quantum mechanics. The challenge is to reproduce the results of the thought experiment in terms of classical physics. The input of the experiment are particles, starting from a common origin, that reach detectors of a device that are independent from each other, the output are the lights of the device that turn on following a specific set of statistics depending on the configuration of the device.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K.; Pol, H. J.; Brinkman, A.; van Joolingen, W. R. (2017-02-17). "Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education". Physical Review Physics Education Research. 13 (1): 010109. arXiv: 1701.01472 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109. ISSN   2469-9896. S2CID   13446988.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Bouchée, T.; de Putter - Smits, L.; Thurlings, M.; Pepin, B. (2022-07-03). "Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses". Studies in Science Education. 58 (2): 183–202. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2021.1963579 . ISSN   0305-7267. S2CID   239272777.
  3. ↑ Marshman, Emily; Singh, Chandralekha (2017-03-01). "Investigating and improving student understanding of the probability distributions for measuring physical observables in quantum mechanics". European Journal of Physics . 38 (2): 025705. Bibcode:2017EJPh...38b5705M. doi: 10.1088/1361-6404/aa57d1 . ISSN   0143-0807. S2CID   126311599.
  4. ↑ Schlosshauer, Maximilian; Kofler, Johannes; Zeilinger, Anton (2013-08-01). "A snapshot of foundational attitudes toward quantum mechanics". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 44 (3): 222–230. arXiv: 1301.1069 . Bibcode:2013SHPMP..44..222S. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004. ISSN   1355-2198. S2CID   55537196.
  5. ↑ Schaffer, Kathryn; Barreto Lemos, Gabriela (24 May 2019). "Obliterating Thingness: An Introduction to the "What" and the "So What" of Quantum Physics". Foundations of Science . 26: 7–26. arXiv: 1908.07936 . doi:10.1007/s10699-019-09608-5. ISSN   1233-1821. S2CID   182656563.
  6. ↑ Dangur, Vered; Avargil, Shirly; Peskin, Uri; Dori, Yehudit Judy (2014). "Learning quantum chemistry via a visual-conceptual approach: students' bidirectional textual and visual understanding". Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15 (3): 297–310. doi:10.1039/C4RP00025K. ISSN   1109-4028.
  7. ↑ Kohnle, Antje; Cassettari, Donatella; Edwards, Tom J.; Ferguson, Callum; Gillies, Alastair D.; Hooley, Christopher A.; Korolkova, Natalia; Llama, Joseph; Sinclair, Bruce D. (2012-02-01). "A new multimedia resource for teaching quantum mechanics concepts". American Journal of Physics. 80 (2): 148–153. doi:10.1119/1.3657800. ISSN   0002-9505.
  8. ↑ McKagan, S. B.; Handley, W.; Perkins, K. K.; Wieman, C. E. (2009-01-01). "A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect". American Journal of Physics. 77 (1): 87–94. arXiv: 0706.2165 . doi:10.1119/1.2978181. ISSN   0002-9505. S2CID   40164976.
  9. ↑ Kragh, Helge (1992-12-01). "A sense of history: History of science and the teaching of introductory quantum theory". Science and Education. 1 (4): 349–363. doi:10.1007/BF00430962. ISSN   0926-7220.
  10. ↑ Mohan, Ashwin Krishnan (June 2020). "Philosophical Standpoints of Textbooks in Quantum Mechanics". Science & Education. 29 (3): 549–569. doi:10.1007/s11191-020-00128-4. ISSN   0926-7220.
  11. ↑ Mermin, N. David (2003-01-01). "From Cbits to Qbits: Teaching computer scientists quantum mechanics". American Journal of Physics. 71 (1): 23–30. arXiv: quant-ph/0207118 . doi:10.1119/1.1522741. ISSN   0002-9505. S2CID   13068252.
  12. ↑ Bitzenbauer, Philipp (2021-07-22). "Effect of an introductory quantum physics course using experiments with heralded photons on preuniversity students' conceptions about quantum physics". Physical Review Physics Education Research. 17 (2): 020103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020103 . ISSN   2469-9896. S2CID   237715353.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.