Thread-local storage

Last updated

In computer programming, thread-local storage (TLS) is a memory management method that uses static or global memory local to a thread. The concept allows storage of data that appears to be global in a system with separate threads.

Contents

Many systems impose restrictions on the size of the thread-local memory block, in fact often rather tight limits. On the other hand, if a system can provide at least a memory address (pointer) sized variable thread-local, then this allows the use of arbitrarily sized memory blocks in a thread-local manner, by allocating such a memory block dynamically and storing the memory address of that block in the thread-local variable. On RISC machines, the calling convention often reserves a thread pointer register for this use.

Usage

While the use of global variables is generally discouraged in modern programming, legacy operating systems such as UNIX are designed for uniprocessor hardware and often use global variables to store important values. An example is the errno used by many functions of the C library. On a modern machine, where multiple threads may be modifying the errno variable, a call of a system function on one thread may overwrite the value previously set by a call of a system function on a different thread, possibly before following code on that different thread could check for the error condition. The solution is to have errno be a variable that looks like it is global, but is physically stored in a per-thread memory pool, the thread-local storage.

A second use case would be multiple threads accumulating information into a global variable. To avoid a race condition, every access to this global variable would have to be protected by a mutex. Instead, each thread might accumulate into a thread-local variable, thereby eliminating any possibility of a race condition, thereby removing the need for locking. The threads then only have to synchronise a final accumulation from their own thread-local variable into a single global variable.

Windows implementation

The application programming interface (API) function TlsAlloc can be used to obtain an unused TLS slot index; the TLS slot index will then be considered 'used'.

The TlsGetValue and TlsSetValue functions are then used to read and write a memory address to a thread-local variable identified by the TLS slot index. TlsSetValue only affects the variable for the current thread. The TlsFree function can be called to release the TLS slot index.

There is a Win32 Thread Information Block for each thread. One of the entries in this block is the thread-local storage table for that thread. [1] TlsAlloc returns an index to this table, unique per address space, for each call. Each thread has its own copy of the thread-local storage table. Hence, each thread can independently use TlsSetValue(index) and obtain the specified value via TlsGetValue(index), because these set and look up an entry in the thread's own table.

Apart from TlsXxx function family, Windows executables can define a section which is mapped to a different page for each thread of the executing process. Unlike TlsXxx values, these pages can contain arbitrary and valid addresses. These addresses, however, are different for each executing thread and therefore should not be passed to asynchronous functions (which may execute in a different thread) or otherwise passed to code which assume that a virtual address is unique within the whole process. TLS sections are managed using memory paging and its size is quantized to a page size (4kB on x86 machines). Such sections may only be defined inside a main executable of a program - DLLs should not contain such sections, because they are not correctly initialized when loading with LoadLibrary.

Pthreads implementation

In the Pthreads API, memory local to a thread is designated with the term Thread-specific data.

The functions pthread_key_create and pthread_key_delete are used respectively to create and delete a key for thread-specific data. The type of the key is explicitly left opaque and is referred to as pthread_key_t. This key can be seen by all threads. In each thread, the key can be associated with thread-specific data via pthread_setspecific. The data can later be retrieved using pthread_getspecific.

In addition pthread_key_create can optionally accept a destructor function that will automatically be called at thread exit, if the thread-specific data is not NULL. The destructor receives the value associated with the key as parameter so it can perform cleanup actions (close connections, free memory, etc.). Even when a destructor is specified, the program must still call pthread_key_delete to free the thread-specific data at process level (the destructor only frees the data local to the thread).

Language-specific implementation

Apart from relying on programmers to call the appropriate API functions, it is also possible to extend the programming language to support thread local storage (TLS).

C and C++

In C11, the keyword _Thread_local is used to define thread-local variables. The header <threads.h>, if supported, defines thread_local as a synonym for that keyword. Example usage:

#include<threads.h>thread_localintfoo=0;

C++11 introduces the thread_local [2] keyword which can be used in the following cases

Aside from that, various compiler implementations provide specific ways to declare thread-local variables:

On Windows versions before Vista and Server 2008, __declspec(thread) works in DLLs only when those DLLs are bound to the executable, and will not work for those loaded with LoadLibrary() (a protection fault or data corruption may occur). [9]

Common Lisp and other dialects

Common Lisp provides a feature called dynamically scoped variables.

Dynamic variables have a binding which is private to the invocation of a function and all of the children called by that function.

This abstraction naturally maps to thread-specific storage, and Lisp implementations that provide threads do this. Common Lisp has numerous standard dynamic variables, and so threads cannot be sensibly added to an implementation of the language without these variables having thread-local semantics in dynamic binding.

For instance the standard variable *print-base* determines the default radix in which integers are printed. If this variable is overridden, then all enclosing code will print integers in an alternate radix:

;;; function foo and its children will print;; in hexadecimal:(let((*print-base*16))(foo))

If functions can execute concurrently on different threads, this binding has to be properly thread-local, otherwise each thread will fight over who controls a global printing radix.

D

In D version 2, all static and global variables are thread-local by default and are declared with syntax similar to "normal" global and static variables in other languages. Global variables must be explicitly requested using the shared keyword:

intthreadLocal;// This is a thread-local variable.sharedintglobal;// This is a global variable shared with all threads.

The shared keyword works both as the storage class, and as a type qualifiershared variables are subject to some restrictions which statically enforce data integrity. [12] To declare a "classic" global variable without these restrictions, the unsafe __gshared keyword must be used: [13]

__gsharedintglobal;// This is a plain old global variable.

Java

In Java, thread-local variables are implemented by the ThreadLocal class object. [14] ThreadLocal holds variable of type T, [14] which is accessible via get/set methods. For example, ThreadLocal variable holding Integer value looks like this:

privatestaticfinalThreadLocal<Integer>myThreadLocalInteger=newThreadLocal<Integer>();

At least for Oracle/OpenJDK, this does not use native thread-local storage in spite of OS threads being used for other aspects of Java threading. Instead, each Thread object stores a (non-thread-safe) map of ThreadLocal objects to their values (as opposed to each ThreadLocal having a map of Thread objects to values and incurring a performance overhead). [15]

.NET languages: C# and others

In .NET Framework languages such as C#, static fields can be marked with the ThreadStatic attribute: [16] :898

classFooBar{[ThreadStatic]privatestaticint_foo;}

In .NET Framework 4.0 the System.Threading.ThreadLocal<T> class is available for allocating and lazily loading thread-local variables. [16] :899

classFooBar{privatestaticSystem.Threading.ThreadLocal<int>_foo;}

Also an API is available for dynamically allocating thread-local variables. [16] :899–890

Object Pascal

In Object Pascal (Delphi) or Free Pascal the threadvar reserved keyword can be used instead of 'var' to declare variables using the thread-local storage.

varmydata_process:integer;threadvarmydata_threadlocal:integer;

Objective-C

In Cocoa, GNUstep, and OpenStep, each NSThread object has a thread-local dictionary that can be accessed through the thread's threadDictionary method.

NSMutableDictionary*dict=[[NSThreadcurrentThread]threadDictionary];dict[@"A key"]=@"Some data";

Perl

In Perl threads were added late in the evolution of the language, after a large body of extant code was already present on the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network (CPAN). Thus, threads in Perl by default take their own local storage for all variables, to minimise the impact of threads on extant non-thread-aware code. In Perl, a thread-shared variable can be created using an attribute:

usethreads;usethreads::shared;my$localvar;my$sharedvar:shared;

PureBasic

In PureBasic thread variables are declared with the keyword Threaded.

Threaded Var

Python

In Python version 2.4 or later, local class in threading module can be used to create thread-local storage.

importthreadingmydata=threading.local()mydata.x=1

Multiple instances of local class can be created to store different sets of variables. [17] Thus, it is not a singleton.

Ruby

Ruby can create/access thread-local variables using []=/[] methods:

Thread.current[:user_id]=1

Rust

Thread-local variables can be created in Rust using the thread_local! macro provided by the Rust standard library:

usestd::cell::RefCell;usestd::thread;thread_local!(staticFOO: RefCell<u32>=RefCell::new(1));FOO.with(|f|{assert_eq!(*f.borrow(),1);*f.borrow_mut()=2;});// each thread starts out with the initial value of 1, even though this thread already changed its copy of the thread local value to 2lett=thread::spawn(move||{FOO.with(|f|{assert_eq!(*f.borrow(),1);*f.borrow_mut()=3;});});// wait for the thread to complete and bail out on panict.join().unwrap();// original thread retains the original value of 2 despite the child thread changing the value to 3 for that threadFOO.with(|f|{assert_eq!(*f.borrow(),2);});

See also

Related Research Articles

Java and C++ are two prominent object-oriented programming languages. By many language popularity metrics, the two languages have dominated object-oriented and high-performance software development for much of the 21st century, and are often directly compared and contrasted. Java's syntax was based on C/C++.

Thread safety is a computer programming concept applicable to multi-threaded code. Thread-safe code only manipulates shared data structures in a manner that ensures that all threads behave properly and fulfill their design specifications without unintended interaction. There are various strategies for making thread-safe data structures.

In programming languages, a closure, also lexical closure or function closure, is a technique for implementing lexically scoped name binding in a language with first-class functions. Operationally, a closure is a record storing a function together with an environment. The environment is a mapping associating each free variable of the function with the value or reference to which the name was bound when the closure was created. Unlike a plain function, a closure allows the function to access those captured variables through the closure's copies of their values or references, even when the function is invoked outside their scope.

In software engineering, double-checked locking is a software design pattern used to reduce the overhead of acquiring a lock by testing the locking criterion before acquiring the lock. Locking occurs only if the locking criterion check indicates that locking is required.

In object-oriented programming (OOP), the object lifetime of an object is the time between an object's creation and its destruction. Rules for object lifetime vary significantly between languages, in some cases between implementations of a given language, and lifetime of a particular object may vary from one run of the program to another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">OpenMP</span> Open standard for parallelizing

OpenMP is an application programming interface (API) that supports multi-platform shared-memory multiprocessing programming in C, C++, and Fortran, on many platforms, instruction-set architectures and operating systems, including Solaris, AIX, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Linux, macOS, and Windows. It consists of a set of compiler directives, library routines, and environment variables that influence run-time behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C syntax</span> Set of rules defining correctly structured programs

The syntax of the C programming language is the set of rules governing writing of software in C. It is designed to allow for programs that are extremely terse, have a close relationship with the resulting object code, and yet provide relatively high-level data abstraction. C was the first widely successful high-level language for portable operating-system development.

In computer science, a union is a value that may have any of several representations or formats within the same position in memory; that consists of a variable that may hold such a data structure. Some programming languages support special data types, called union types, to describe such values and variables. In other words, a union type definition will specify which of a number of permitted primitive types may be stored in its instances, e.g., "float or long integer". In contrast with a record, which could be defined to contain both a float and an integer; in a union, there is only one value at any given time.

In computer science and software engineering, busy-waiting, busy-looping or spinning is a technique in which a process repeatedly checks to see if a condition is true, such as whether keyboard input or a lock is available. Spinning can also be used to generate an arbitrary time delay, a technique that was necessary on systems that lacked a method of waiting a specific length of time. Processor speeds vary greatly from computer to computer, especially as some processors are designed to dynamically adjust speed based on current workload. Consequently, spinning as a time-delay technique can produce unpredictable or even inconsistent results on different systems unless code is included to determine the time a processor takes to execute a "do nothing" loop, or the looping code explicitly checks a real-time clock.

In class-based, object-oriented programming, a constructor is a special type of function called to create an object. It prepares the new object for use, often accepting arguments that the constructor uses to set required member variables.

In computer programming, volatile means that a value is prone to change over time, outside the control of some code. Volatility has implications within function calling conventions, and also impacts how variables are stored, accessed and cached.

Cilk, Cilk++, Cilk Plus and OpenCilk are general-purpose programming languages designed for multithreaded parallel computing. They are based on the C and C++ programming languages, which they extend with constructs to express parallel loops and the fork–join idiom.

In computer programming, a static variable is a variable that has been allocated "statically", meaning that its lifetime is the entire run of the program. This is in contrast to shorter-lived automatic variables, whose storage is stack allocated and deallocated on the call stack; and in contrast to objects, whose storage is dynamically allocated and deallocated in heap memory.

In some programming languages, const is a type qualifier that indicates that the data is read-only. While this can be used to declare constants, const in the C family of languages differs from similar constructs in other languages in being part of the type, and thus has complicated behavior when combined with pointers, references, composite data types, and type-checking. In other languages, the data is not in a single memory location, but copied at compile time on each use. Languages which use it include C, C++, D, JavaScript, Julia, and Rust.

The C and C++ programming languages are closely related but have many significant differences. C++ began as a fork of an early, pre-standardized C, and was designed to be mostly source-and-link compatible with C compilers of the time. Due to this, development tools for the two languages are often integrated into a single product, with the programmer able to specify C or C++ as their source language.

C++11 is a version of the ISO/IEC 14882 standard for the C++ programming language. C++11 replaced the prior version of the C++ standard, called C++03, and was later replaced by C++14. The name follows the tradition of naming language versions by the publication year of the specification, though it was formerly named C++0x because it was expected to be published before 2010.

In computer programming, a pure function is a function that has the following properties:

  1. the function return values are identical for identical arguments, and
  2. the function has no side effects.

In computer programming, an anonymous function is a function definition that is not bound to an identifier. Anonymous functions are often arguments being passed to higher-order functions or used for constructing the result of a higher-order function that needs to return a function. If the function is only used once, or a limited number of times, an anonymous function may be syntactically lighter than using a named function. Anonymous functions are ubiquitous in functional programming languages and other languages with first-class functions, where they fulfil the same role for the function type as literals do for other data types.

C++14 is a version of the ISO/IEC 14882 standard for the C++ programming language. It is intended to be a small extension over C++11, featuring mainly bug fixes and small improvements, and was replaced by C++17. Its approval was announced on August 18, 2014. C++14 was published as ISO/IEC 14882:2014 in December 2014.

Objective-C is a high-level general-purpose, object-oriented programming language that adds Smalltalk-style messaging to the C programming language. Originally developed by Brad Cox and Tom Love in the early 1980s, it was selected by NeXT for its NeXTSTEP operating system. Due to Apple macOS’s direct lineage from NeXTSTEP, Objective-C was the standard programming language used, supported, and promoted by Apple for developing macOS and iOS applications until the introduction of the Swift programming language in 2014.

References

  1. Pietrek, Matt (May 2006). "Under the Hood". MSDN . Retrieved 6 April 2010.
  2. Section 3.7.2 in C++11 standard
  3. "C-Compiler Information Specific to Sun's Implementation". C User's Guide Sun Studio 8. 2004. 2.3 Thread Local Storage Specifier.
  4. "XL C/C++ compilers". August 2010. Thread-local storage (TLS). Archived from the original on 11 April 2011.
  5. "Thread-Local Storage". GCC 3.3.1 Manual. 2003.
  6. "LLVM 2.0 Release Notes". 23 May 2007. llvm-gcc Improvements.
  7. "Clang Language Extensions - Clang 3.8 documentation". Introduction. This document describes the language extensions provided by Clang. In addition to the language extensions listed here, Clang aims to support a broad range of GCC extensions. Please see the GCC manual for more information on these extensions.
  8. "Intel® C++ Compiler 8.1 for Linux Release Notes For Intel IA-32 and Itanium® Processors" (PDF). 2004. Thread-local Storage. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 January 2015.
  9. 1 2 Visual Studio 2003: "Thread Local Storage (TLS)". Microsoft Docs . 5 June 2017.
  10. Intel C++ Compiler 10.0 (windows): Thread-local storage
  11. "Attributes in Clang - Clang 3.8 documentation". thread.
  12. Alexandrescu, Andrei (6 July 2010). Chapter 13 - Concurrency. InformIT. p. 3. Retrieved 3 January 2014.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  13. Bright, Walter (12 May 2009). "Migrating to Shared". dlang.org. Retrieved 3 January 2014.
  14. 1 2 Bloch 2018, p. 151-155, §Item 33: Consider typesafe heterogeneous containers.
  15. "How is Java's ThreadLocal implemented under the hood?". Stack Overflow. Stack Exchange. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
  16. 1 2 3 Albahari 2022.
  17. "cpython/Lib/_threading_local.py at 3.12 · python/cpython". GitHub. Retrieved 25 October 2023.

Bibliography