Eye contact effect

Last updated

The eye-contact effect is a psychological phenomenon in human selective attention and cognition. It is the effect that the perception of eye contact with another human face has on certain mechanisms in the brain. [1] This contact has been shown to increase activation in certain areas of what has been termed the ‘social brain’. [2] This social brain network processes social information as the face, [3] theory of mind, [4] empathy, [5] and goal-directedness. [6]

Contents

Activation in the brain

When gaze is direct, the eye-contact effect produces activation in the social brain. [2] These six regions demonstrate that perceived eye contact increases activation of elements within this network, with the area of activation depending on task demands and the social context.

Fusiform gyrus

Increase in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) shows larger activation for direct than averted gaze in this area. [7] It has been suggested that this increased activation is related to initial increased face encoding. However, these effects are absent when one has already been presented with a face and its gaze shifts towards the participant. This indicates that when attending to face identity, face encoding effects can be masked. [1]

Anterior, right side of superior temporal sulcus

When directing gaze specifically towards the eye area, the anterior, right side of the superior temporal sulcus is activated, indicating facilitation of gaze direction encoding in this region when eye contact is present. [8] Like the fusiform gyrus, this effect can also be masked in this area. [7]

Posterior, right side of superior temporal sulcus

The activation in this region of the brain during the eye contact effect is not always consistent. Although it has been demonstrated in several studies when dynamic stimuli are used, [9] activation is not demonstrated across all literatures. [10] The studies that demonstrate activation provided social or communicative context in their experiments, suggesting that the eye-contact effect only activates the posterior right side of superior temporal sulcus in these instances.

Medial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex

These two areas activate when dynamic facial expressions are presented as well as in a communication context when participants are required to decode the intention of the presented face. Like the posterior right side of superior temporal sulcus, this suggests that context could be a factor in this activation. However, some studies have shown higher activation in the medial prefrontal cortex when averted gaze is perceived than direct gaze. This activation was in a slightly posterior position compared to the areas which had higher activation for direct gaze.

Amygdala

The activation in the amygdala, like the posterior right side of superior temporal sulcus, is not hugely consistent either. While three studies have found activation for direct gaze in this area, several studies have found no effect. It is speculated that due to the small size of the amygdala, neural imaging methods are not sensitive enough to correctly detect activation.

Underlying mechanisms

Three models have been developed to explain the mechanisms underlying the eye-contact effect. These models show the areas of the brain that are activated by direct eye contact and where they overlap in activation with areas in the brain related to the social brain network.

The affective arousal model

This model proposes that eye contact directly activates brain arousal systems and emotional responses which influences perceptual and cognitive processing. Because reciprocated eye contact elevates emotional arousal, [11] activation becomes widespread across cortical structures as emotional arousal is often associated with the amygdala. As gaze is directed towards the perceiver, activation increases in a region in the right amygdala. [12] However, this model fails to account for the selective nature of activation effects. Activation must be more widespread across the network if general arousal is the main effect at work.

The communicative intention detector model

Eye contact signals intent of communication and the social significance of eye gaze engages theory of mind computations. [13] Because there is an overlap of activation in structures involved in theory of mind computation with regions associated with eye contact detection, this model proposes that this is the mechanism that causes the eye contact effect. However, only parts of the theory of mind network (medial prefrontal cortex, posterior right side of superior temporal sulcus, and sometimes precuneus and amygdala) are activated depending on task demands and context.

The first-track modulator model

Proposed by Senju and Johnson, this model argues that the eye contact effect is facilitated by the subcortical face detection pathway. This pathway involves the superior colliculus, pulvinar, and amygdala. This route is fast and operates on low spatial frequency and modulates cortical face processing. [1] [14]

Development

Sensitivity to eye contact is present in newborns. From as early as four months old cortical activation as a result of eye contact has suggested that infants are able to detect and orient towards faces that make eye contact with them. [15] This sensitivity to eye contact remains as the presence of eye contact has an effect on the processing of social stimuli in slightly older infants. For example, a 9-month-old infant will shift its gaze towards an object in response to another face shifting its gaze towards the same object. [16]

As humans get older, the eye contact effect develops as well. Accurate face recognition facilitated by direct gaze improves over the period of development from 6 to 11 years of age. [17]

Atypical development

Autism spectrum disorders

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), which include autism and Asperger syndrome, are characterized by difficulties with social interaction and communication. Atypical responses to direct gaze, a characteristic of ASD, have been demonstrated to manifest in infancy, [18] suggesting that these responses are present from early in development.

Due to these difficulties, the development of the eye contact effect may be obstructed. However, studies addressing eye contact in individuals with ASD can elicit mixed results. Response to eye contact has been identified as stronger neuro-physiologically for direct gaze than indirect gaze. [19] This may be due to individuals with ASD responding faster to eye contact based on their detection of features, rather than in the facial context. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Limbic system</span> Set of brain structures involved in emotion and motivation

The limbic system, also known as the paleomammalian cortex, is a set of brain structures located on both sides of the thalamus, immediately beneath the medial temporal lobe of the cerebrum primarily in the forebrain.

A facial expression is one or more motions or positions of the muscles beneath the skin of the face. According to one set of controversial theories, these movements convey the emotional state of an individual to observers. Facial expressions are a form of nonverbal communication. They are a primary means of conveying social information between humans, but they also occur in most other mammals and some other animal species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Face perception</span> Cognitive process of visually interpreting the human face

Facial perception is an individual's understanding and interpretation of the face. Here, perception implies the presence of consciousness and hence excludes automated facial recognition systems. Although facial recognition is found in other species, this article focuses on facial perception in humans.

In psychology, theory of mind refers to the capacity to understand other people by ascribing mental states to them. A theory of mind includes the knowledge that others' beliefs, desires, intentions, emotions, and thoughts may be different from one's own. Possessing a functional theory of mind is crucial for success in everyday human social interactions. People utilize a theory of mind when analyzing, judging, and inferring others' behaviors. The discovery and development of theory of mind primarily came from studies done with animals and infants. Factors including drug and alcohol consumption, language development, cognitive delays, age, and culture can affect a person's capacity to display theory of mind. Having a theory of mind is similar to but not identical with having the capacity for empathy or sympathy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superior temporal gyrus</span> One of three gyri of the temporal lobe of the brain

The superior temporal gyrus (STG) is one of three gyri in the temporal lobe of the human brain, which is located laterally to the head, situated somewhat above the external ear.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eye contact</span> Form of nonverbal communication

Eye contact occurs when two people or animals look at each other's eyes at the same time. In people, eye contact is a form of nonverbal communication and can have a large influence on social behavior. Coined in the early to mid-1960s, the term came from the West to often define the act as a meaningful and important sign of confidence and respect. The customs, meaning, and significance of eye contact can vary greatly between societies, neurotypes, and religions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mu wave</span> Electrical activity in the part of the brain controlling voluntary movement

The sensorimotor mu rhythm, also known as mu wave, comb or wicket rhythms or arciform rhythms, are synchronized patterns of electrical activity involving large numbers of neurons, probably of the pyramidal type, in the part of the brain that controls voluntary movement. These patterns as measured by electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), or electrocorticography (ECoG), repeat at a frequency of 7.5–12.5 Hz, and are most prominent when the body is physically at rest. Unlike the alpha wave, which occurs at a similar frequency over the resting visual cortex at the back of the scalp, the mu rhythm is found over the motor cortex, in a band approximately from ear to ear. People suppress mu rhythms when they perform motor actions or, with practice, when they visualize performing motor actions. This suppression is called desynchronization of the wave because EEG wave forms are caused by large numbers of neurons firing in synchrony. The mu rhythm is even suppressed when one observes another person performing a motor action or an abstract motion with biological characteristics. Researchers such as V. S. Ramachandran and colleagues have suggested that this is a sign that the mirror neuron system is involved in mu rhythm suppression, although others disagree.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temporoparietal junction</span> Area of the brain where the temporal and parietal lobes meet

The temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is an area of the brain where the temporal and parietal lobes meet, at the posterior end of the lateral sulcus. The TPJ incorporates information from the thalamus and the limbic system as well as from the visual, auditory, and somatosensory systems. The TPJ also integrates information from both the external environment as well as from within the body. The TPJ is responsible for collecting all of this information and then processing it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint attention</span> When two people focus on something at once

Joint attention or shared attention is the shared focus of two individuals on an object. It is achieved when one individual alerts another to an object by means of eye-gazing, pointing or other verbal or non-verbal indications. An individual gazes at another individual, points to an object and then returns their gaze to the individual. Scaife and Bruner were the first researchers to present a cross-sectional description of children's ability to follow eye gaze in 1975. They found that most eight- to ten-month-old children followed a line of regard, and that all 11- to 14-month-old children did so. This early research showed it was possible for an adult to bring certain objects in the environment to an infant's attention using eye gaze.

Emotional responsivity is the ability to acknowledge an affective stimuli by exhibiting emotion. It is a sharp change of emotion according to a person's emotional state. Increased emotional responsivity refers to demonstrating more response to a stimulus. Reduced emotional responsivity refers to demonstrating less response to a stimulus. Any response exhibited after exposure to the stimulus, whether it is appropriate or not, would be considered as an emotional response. Although emotional responsivity applies to nonclinical populations, it is more typically associated with individuals with schizophrenia and autism.

The concept of motor cognition grasps the notion that cognition is embodied in action, and that the motor system participates in what is usually considered as mental processing, including those involved in social interaction. The fundamental unit of the motor cognition paradigm is action, defined as the movements produced to satisfy an intention towards a specific motor goal, or in reaction to a meaningful event in the physical and social environments. Motor cognition takes into account the preparation and production of actions, as well as the processes involved in recognizing, predicting, mimicking, and understanding the behavior of other people. This paradigm has received a great deal of attention and empirical support in recent years from a variety of research domains including embodied cognition, developmental psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superior temporal sulcus</span> Part of the brains temporal lobe

In the human brain, the superior temporal sulcus (STS) is the sulcus separating the superior temporal gyrus from the middle temporal gyrus in the temporal lobe of the brain. A sulcus is a deep groove that curves into the largest part of the brain, the cerebrum, and a gyrus is a ridge that curves outward of the cerebrum.

Memory supports and enables social interactions in a variety of ways. In order to engage in successful social interaction, people must be able to remember how they should interact with one another, whom they have interacted with previously, and what occurred during those interactions. There are a lot of brain processes and functions that go into the application and use of memory in social interactions, as well as psychological reasoning for its importance.

Social cues are verbal or non-verbal signals expressed through the face, body, voice, motion and guide conversations as well as other social interactions by influencing our impressions of and responses to others. These percepts are important communicative tools as they convey important social and contextual information and therefore facilitate social understanding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parental brain</span>

Parental experience, as well as changing hormone levels during pregnancy and postpartum, cause changes in the parental brain. Displaying maternal sensitivity towards infant cues, processing those cues and being motivated to engage socially with her infant and attend to the infant's needs in any context could be described as mothering behavior and is regulated by many systems in the maternal brain. Research has shown that hormones such as oxytocin, prolactin, estradiol and progesterone are essential for the onset and the maintenance of maternal behavior in rats, and other mammals as well. Mothering behavior has also been classified within the basic drives.

A neurological look at race is multifaceted. The cross-race effect has been neurologically explained by there being differences in brain processing while viewing same-race and other-race faces. There is a debate over the cause of the cross-race effect.

Autism is characterized by the early onset of impairments in reciprocal social interaction and communication and restricted repetitive behaviors or interests. One of the many hypotheses explaining the psychopathology of autism, the deficit in joint attention hypothesis is prominent in explaining the disorder's social and communicative deficits. Nonverbal autism is a subset of autism spectrum where the person does not learn how to speak. One study has shown that 64% of autistic children who are nonverbal at age 5, are still nonverbal 10 years later.

The first half of the topic of agency deals with the behavioral sense, or outward expressive evidence thereof. In behavioral psychology, agents are goal-directed entities that are able to monitor their environment to select and perform efficient means-ends actions that are available in a given situation to achieve an intended goal. Behavioral agency, therefore, implies the ability to perceive and to change the environment of the agent. Crucially, it also entails intentionality to represent the goal-state in the future, equifinal variability to be able to achieve the intended goal-state with different actions in different contexts, and rationality of actions in relation to their goal to produce the most efficient action available. Cognitive scientists and Behavioral psychologists have thoroughly investigated agency attribution in humans and non-human animals, since social cognitive mechanisms such as communication, social learning, imitation, or theory of mind presuppose the ability to identify agents and differentiate them from inanimate, non-agentive objects. This ability has also been assumed to have a major effect on inferential and predictive processes of the observers of agents, because agentive entities are expected to perform autonomous behavior based on their current and previous knowledge and intentions. On the other hand, inanimate objects are supposed to react to external physical forces.

Social cognitive neuroscience is the scientific study of the biological processes underpinning social cognition. Specifically, it uses the tools of neuroscience to study "the mental mechanisms that create, frame, regulate, and respond to our experience of the social world". Social cognitive neuroscience uses the epistemological foundations of cognitive neuroscience, and is closely related to social neuroscience. Social cognitive neuroscience employs human neuroimaging, typically using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Human brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation are also used. In nonhuman animals, direct electrophysiological recordings and electrical stimulation of single cells and neuronal populations are utilized for investigating lower-level social cognitive processes.

The pathophysiology of autism is the study of the physiological processes that cause or are otherwise associated with autism spectrum disorders.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Senju, Atsushi; Johnson, Mark H. (2009-02-13). "The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 13 (3): 127–134. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009. PMID   19217822. S2CID   2873180.
  2. 1 2 Johnson, Mark H.; Griffin, Richard; Csibra, Gergely; Halit, Hanife; Farroni, Teresa; De Haan, Michelle; Tucker, Leslie A.; Baron–Cohen, Simon; Richards, John (2005). "The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development". Development and Psychopathology. 17 (3): 599–619. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050297. ISSN   0954-5794. PMC   1464100 . PMID   16262984.
  3. ↑ Hoffman, Elizabeth A.; Haxby, James V. (January 2000). "Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception". Nature Neuroscience. 3 (1): 80–84. doi:10.1038/71152. ISSN   1097-6256. PMID   10607399. S2CID   369825.
  4. ↑ Frith, Chris D.; Frith, Uta (2006-05-18). "The Neural Basis of Mentalizing". Neuron. 50 (4): 531–534. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001 . PMID   16701204. S2CID   16198411.
  5. ↑ Singer, Tania (2006). "The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 30 (6): 855–863. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011. PMID   16904182. S2CID   15411628.
  6. ↑ Pelphrey, Kevin A.; Morris, James P. (June 2006). "Brain Mechanisms for Interpreting the Actions of Others From Biological-Motion Cues". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 15 (3): 136–140. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00423.x. ISSN   0963-7214. PMC   2136413 . PMID   18079992.
  7. 1 2 George, Nathalie; Driver, Jon; Dolan, Raymond J. (June 2001). "Seen Gaze-Direction Modulates Fusiform Activity and Its Coupling with Other Brain Areas during Face Processing". NeuroImage. 13 (6): 1102–1112. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0769. hdl: 21.11116/0000-0001-A1AE-5 . PMID   11352615. S2CID   8311624.
  8. ↑ Calder, Andrew J; Lawrence, Andrew D; Keane, Jill; Scott, Sophie K; Owen, Adrian M; Christoffels, Ingrid; Young, Andrew W (2002-01-01). "Reading the mind from eye gaze". Neuropsychologia. 40 (8): 1129–1138. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00008-8. ISSN   0028-3932. PMID   11931917. S2CID   13910127.
  9. ↑ Conty, Laurence; N’Diaye, Karim; Tijus, Charles; George, Nathalie (2007-10-01). "When eye creates the contact! ERP evidence for early dissociation between direct and averted gaze motion processing". Neuropsychologia. 45 (13): 3024–3037. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.017. PMID   17644145. S2CID   25441481.
  10. ↑ Wicker, Bruno; Perrett, David I; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Decety, Jean (2003). "Being the target of another's emotion: a PET study". Neuropsychologia. 41 (2): 139–146. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00144-6. PMID   12459212. S2CID   46066691.
  11. ↑ Nichols, K. A.; Champness, B. G. (1971-11-01). "Eye gaze and the GSR". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 7 (6): 623–626. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(71)90024-2. ISSN   0022-1031.
  12. ↑ Kawashima, Ryuta; Sugiura, Motoaki; Kato, Takashi; Nakamura, Akinori; Hatano, Kentaro; Ito, Kengo; Fukuda, Hiroshi; Kojima, Shozo; Nakamura, Katsuki (April 1999). "The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring". Brain. 122 (4): 779–783. doi:10.1093/brain/122.4.779. ISSN   1460-2156. PMID   10219788.
  13. ↑ Wicker, B., Perrett, D. I., Baron-Cohen, S., & Decety, J. (2003) Being the target of another's emotion: a PET study. Neuropsychologia, 41(2) 139-146.
  14. ↑ Johnson, Mark H. (2005-10-01). "Subcortical face processing". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 6 (10): 766–774. doi:10.1038/nrn1766. ISSN   1471-0048. PMID   16276354. S2CID   205500386.
  15. ↑ Farroni, Teresa; Massaccesi, Stefano; Menon, Enrica; Johnson, Mark H. (March 2007). "Direct gaze modulates face recognition in young infants". Cognition. 102 (3): 396–404. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.007. PMID   16540101. S2CID   13957199.
  16. ↑ Senju, Atsushi; Csibra, Gergely; Johnson, Mark H. (2008-08-01). "Understanding the referential nature of looking: Infants' preference for object-directed gaze". Cognition. 108 (2): 303–319. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.009. ISSN   0010-0277. PMID   18371943. S2CID   1340375.
  17. ↑ Smith, Alastair D.; Hood, Bruce M.; Hector, Karen (September 2006). "Eye remember you two: gaze direction modulates face recognition in a developmental study". Developmental Science. 9 (5): 465–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00513.x. ISSN   1363-755X. PMID   16911448.
  18. ↑ Elsabbagh, Mayada; Volein, Agnes; Csibra, Gergely; Holmboe, Karla; Garwood, Holly; Tucker, Leslie; Krljes, Sanya; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Bolton, Patrick; Charman, Tony; Baird, Gillian; Johnson, Mark H. (2009-01-01). "Neural Correlates of Eye Gaze Processing in the Infant Broader Autism Phenotype". Biological Psychiatry. 65 (1): 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.09.034. PMID   19064038. S2CID   13936224.
  19. ↑ Kylliäinen, Anneli; Hietanen, Jari K. (2006-03-23). "Skin Conductance Responses to Another Person's Gaze in Children with Autism". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 36 (4): 517–525. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0091-4. ISSN   0162-3257. PMID   16555137. S2CID   29319389.
  20. ↑ Senju, Atsushi; Hasegawa, Toshikazu; Tojo, Yoshikuni (2005-11-01). "Does perceived direct gaze boost detection in adults and children with and without autism? The stare-in-the-crowd effect revisited". Visual Cognition. 12 (8): 1474–1496. doi:10.1080/13506280444000797. ISSN   1350-6285. S2CID   14524916.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.