Rhipicephalus microplus

Last updated

Rhipicephalus microplus
Rhipicephalus-microplus-female-male.jpg
female and male
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Subgenus:
Species:
R. microplus
Binomial name
Rhipicephalus microplus
(Canestrini, 1888)
Synonyms
  • Boophilus annulatus australisLahille, 1905
  • Boophilus annulatus calcaratusSharif, 1928
  • Boophilus annulatus caudatusLahille, 1905
  • Boophilus annulatus microdusArnold, 1935 (misapplied name)
  • Boophilus annulatus microplusLahille, 1905
  • Boophilus australisStiles & Hassall, 1901
  • Boophilus caudatusLahille, 1905
  • Boophilus intraoculatusMinning, 1936
  • Boophilus microplusLahille, 1905
  • Boophilus microplus annulatusFloch, 1956
  • Boophilus (Margaropus) annulatus australisToumanoff, 1944
  • Boophilus (Palpoboophilus) minningiKishida, 1936
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) caudatusMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) cyclopsMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) distansMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) fallaxMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) krijgsmaniMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) longiscutatusMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) microplusMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) rotundiscutatusMinning, 1934
  • Boophilus (Uroboophilus) sharifiMinning, 1934
  • Haemaphysalis microplaCanestrini, 1888
  • Ixodes australisRuotsalainen, 1903 (misapplied name)
  • Margaropus annulatus argentinusCastellani & Chalmers, 1910
  • Margaropus annulatus australisNewstead, 1909
  • Margaropus annulatus caudatusNeumann, 1911
  • Margaropus annulatus mexicanusMacias Valadez, 1923
  • Margaropus annulatus microphilusCastellani & Chalmers, 1919
  • Margaropus annulatus microplusRohr, 1909
  • Margaropus australisManson, 1907
  • Margaropus caudatusCastellani & Chalmers, 1910
  • Margaropus microphilusCastellani & Chalmers, 1910 (misapplied name)
  • Margaropus microplaNeumann, 1911
  • Margaropus microplusHunter & Hooker, 1907
  • Palpoboophilus brachyurisKishida, 1939
  • Palpoboophilus minningiKishida, 1939
  • Rhipicaphalus annulatus caudatusNeumann, 1897
  • Rhipicaphalus australisFuller, 1899
  • Rhipicephalus annulatus argentinensisNeumann, 1901
  • Rhipicephalus annulatus argentinusNeumann, 1901
  • Rhipicephalus annulatus australisNeumann, 1901
  • Rhipicephalus annulatus caudatusNeumann, 1901
  • Rhipicephalus annulatus microplusNeumann, 1901
  • Rhipicephalus annulatus microplusNeumann, 1901
  • Rhipicephalus caudatusFuller, 1899
  • Rhipicephalus microplusCanestrini, 1890
  • Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) argentinusNeumann, 1904
  • Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus
  • Uroboophilus australisKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus caudatusKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus cyclopsSchulze, 1936
  • Uroboophilus distansSchulze, 1935
  • Uroboophilus fallaxKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus indicusMinning, 1936
  • Uroboophilus krijgsmaniKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus longiscutatusKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus microplusKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus occidentalisMinning, 1936
  • Uroboophilus rotundiscutatusKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus sharifiKishida, 1939
  • Uroboophilus sinensisSchulze, 1935

The Asian blue tick (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, Rhipicephalus microplus, or Boophilus microplus) is an economically important tick that parasitises a variety of livestock and wild mammal species, [1] especially cattle, on which it is the most economically significant ectoparasite in the world. [2] It is known as the Australian cattle tick, southern cattle tick, Cuban tick, Madagascar blue tick, and Puerto Rican Texas fever tick. [3]

Contents

It is classified as a hard tick in the family Ixodidae. It is a small teardrop-shaped arachnid with a hardened plate called the scutum covering its head. Males are entirely covered in scutum on their backs with additional plates called festoons along their sides. The body can be brown or pale in nymphs and darkens as the tick matures. Adults have 8 cream-colored legs. [1]

In R. microplus the hypostome has a hexagonal base (basis capitulum) which can be used as an identifying characteristic. Ticks may be identified by the arrangement of hair-like structures called setae. In R. microplus the setae are arranged in rows of two or three along the tick's body behind the scutum. [1]

Parasitism

Rhipicephalus microplus is best known for being a cattle parasite. However, it has also been discovered in a number of other animal hosts such as domestic water buffalo, wild and domestic goats, horses, wild pigs, various rat species, and humans. [4]

R. microplus serves as a vector for numerous pathogens, most notably Babesia bigemina and B. bovis . B. bigemina and B. bovis are responsible for bovine babesiosis which is ranked as the most economically important arthropod-transmitted illness in cattle. Bovine babesiosis is characterized by anemia, fever, and potentially multiple organ failure. [5] This results in weight loss and lower milk production in infected cattle and therefore, massive economic losses in countries like Brazil where 80% of the cattle population is infected. [6] R. microplus has also been shown to be a vector for Ehrlichia ruminantium in West Africa. [7] E. ruminantium causes fluid buildup around the heart in cattle and other species, a condition with an 80% mortality rate, causing significant economic damage in infected areas. [7] [8]

Distribution

Rhipicephalus microplus was originally found in the tropical and sub-tropical forests of India. However, due to the centuries-long movement of cattle around Europe, R. microplus has dramatically spread from its original range, making it to the United States between 4 and 5 centuries ago. [9] [10] R. microplus is generally found between 32°N and 32°S, a region strongly overlapping with major cattle breeding countries and territories. [9]

Nearly a cosmopolitan species, Asian blue tick is found specifically in Costa Rica, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Brazil, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Argentina, Colombia, Cote D'Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ethiopia, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Guam, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Martinique, Mexico, Montserrat, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam, Virgin Islands (U.S.), Zambia and Zimbabwe. [11]

Tick populations in Australia once thought to belong to R. microplus are now recognized to belong to R. australis, which was reinstated as a sibling species of R. microplus in 2012. [12]

Having formerly been present in the United States, it has since been eradicated there, except for sporadic occurrences in a buffer zone along the Mexican border. [1]

In Louisiana, Governor Ruffin Pleasant in 1917 signed legislation sponsored by freshman State Senator Norris C. Williamson of East Carroll Parish to authorize state funding to eradicate the cattle tick. [13]

Climate change

Some veterinary science research suggests that R. microplus could become established in the currently temperate countries once their autumns and winters become warmer by about 2–2.75 °C (3.60–4.95 °F). [14]

Life cycle

The life cycle of R. microplus has been examined under laboratory conditions using rabbit hosts. The average life cycle was determined to be approximately 65 days. The life cycle begins with an adult female which feeds for approximately 7 days before entering a 4-day pre-oviposition period. During pre-oviposition a female will mate with any and all males who present themselves. The female tick then spends 8.6 days in oviposition, during which time she will lay her eggs. On average, each female lays about 1450 eggs per brood. The eggs take about 21 days to hatch. Approximately 83.5% will survive to hatch into a free-living larval stage which lasts for 3.5 days. The larvae have their first feeding at this time, and their first molt 8 days later. At this point, the larvae have become nymphs. They will feed for 11 days before becoming adults. [15]

Control

Management efforts in the United States began after R. microplus was deemed responsible for an estimated $63 billion in damages during the early 19th century. A control campaign began in 1906 and by 1943 it was considered complete, having eradicated most of the tick population other than a small region along the Southern US border. [9] [10] In the modern day, the standard form of control is spraying of acaricides: a type of pesticide that targets ticks and mites. Overuse of acaricides has resulted in some R. microplus populations developing resistance, [16] and it is now considered the most resistant tick ever. [4] Other control methods include ivermectin, a common anti-parasitic. In Mexico, it has been shown that R. microplus populations are developing varying levels of resistance to ivermectin, meaning this treatment is becoming less effective year over year. [17]

Vaccinating cattle against R. microplus was considered as another option, however, the original Bm86-based vaccines have shown limited efficacy against R. microplus as compared to other tick species. [4]

Acaricides and pyrethroids are commonly used however this has led to the development of acaricide- and pyrethroid- resistances. [2] Acaricide resistance in R. microplus is mediated by para sodium channel mutants. [2] Such alleles can be rapidly detected in a border livestock inspection by PCR+High Resolution Melt testing. [2] This is especially useful on the United States-Mexico border where the US has almost eradicated R. microplus, but Mexico has a high prevalence and a high prevalence of acaricide resistance. [2] This technique could also be applied in other countries where pyrethroid resistant R. microplus is a common problem. [2]

Some populations of R. microplus have developed resistance to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. [18] The search for the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) mutations responsible has been stymied because, although there are only three AChEs in this genome, all three have a high copy number. [18] Progress has been made by Bellgard et al., 2012, Temeyer et al., 2012, and Bendele et al., 2015 toward identifying acaricide resistance alleles. [18]

Another management option that has shown promise is the use of pasture rotation. This is based on knowledge of the R. microplus life cycle. A large pasture is divided up into multiple regions that cattle are moved between regularly. The rotation time is based on the time it takes the R. microplus eggs to hatch. If timed correctly, the larvae in an area only become viable after the cattle have moved, leading to loss of that R. microplus generation. This has been shown to be effective in reducing the tick population. However, the amount of time a pasture needs to remain empty means it isn't generally economically viable for farmers. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tick</span> Order of arachnids in the arthropod phylum

Ticks are parasitic arachnids that are part of the mite superorder Parasitiformes. Adult ticks are approximately 3 to 5 mm in length depending on age, sex, species, and "fullness". Ticks are external parasites, living by feeding on the blood of mammals, birds, and sometimes reptiles and amphibians. The timing of the origin of ticks is uncertain, though the oldest known tick fossils are from the Cretaceous period, around 100 million years old. Ticks are widely distributed around the world, especially in warm, humid climates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ixodidae</span> Family of ticks

The Ixodidae are the family of hard ticks or scale ticks, one of the three families of ticks, consisting of over 700 species. They are known as 'hard ticks' because they have a scutum or hard shield, which the other major family of ticks, the 'soft ticks' (Argasidae), lack. They are ectoparasites of a wide range of host species, and some are vectors of pathogens that can cause human disease.

<i>Babesia</i> Genus of protozoan parasites

Babesia, also called Nuttallia, is an apicomplexan parasite that infects red blood cells and is transmitted by ticks. Originally discovered by the Romanian bacteriologist Victor Babeș in 1888, over 100 species of Babesia have since been identified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anaplasmosis</span> Medical condition

Anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease affecting ruminants, dogs, and horses, and is caused by Anaplasma bacteria. Anaplasmosis is an infectious but not contagious disease. Anaplasmosis can be transmitted through mechanical and biological vector processes. Anaplasmosis can also be referred to as "yellow bag" or "yellow fever" because the infected animal can develop a jaundiced look. Other signs of infection include weight loss, diarrhea, paleness of the skin, aggressive behavior, and high fever.

<i>Ehrlichia ruminantium</i> Ruminant disease

Heartwater is a tick-borne rickettsial disease. The name is derived from the fact that fluid can collect around the heart or in the lungs of infected animals. It is caused by Ehrlichia ruminantium —an intracellular Gram-negative coccal bacterium. The disease is spread by various Amblyomma ticks, and has a large economic impact on cattle production in affected areas. There are four documented manifestations of the disease, these are acute, peracute, subacute, and a mild form known as heartwater fever. There are reports of zoonotic infections of humans by E. ruminantium, similar to other Ehrlichia species, such as those that cause human ehrlichiosis.

<i>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</i> Species of species of tick found worldwide

Rhipicephalus sanguineus, commonly called the brown dog tick, kennel tick, or pantropical dog tick, is a species of tick found worldwide, but more commonly in warmer climates. This species is unusual among ticks in that its entire lifecycle can be completed indoors. The brown dog tick is easily recognized by its reddish-brown color, elongated body shape, and hexagonal basis capituli. Adults are 2.28 to 3.18 mm in length and 1.11 to 1.68 mm in width. They do not have ornamentation on their backs.

<i>Dermacentor</i> Genus of ticks

Dermacentor is a genus of ticks in the family Ixodidae, the hard ticks. The genus has a cosmopolitan distribution, with native species on all continents except Australia. Most are found in North America.

<i>Rhipicephalus</i> Genus of ticks

Rhipicephalus is a genus of ticks in the family Ixodidae, the hard ticks, consisting of about 74 or 75 species. Most are native to tropical Africa.

<i>Ixodes pacificus</i> Species of arachnid

Ixodes pacificus, the western black-legged tick, is a species of parasitic tick found on the western coast of North America. I. pacificus is a member of the family Ixodidae. It is the principal vector of Lyme disease in that region. I. pacificus typically feeds on lizards and small mammals therefore its rate of transmission of Lyme disease to humans is around 1% of adults. It is an ectoparasite that attaches itself to the outside of its host and feeds on the host's blood. It can have a heteroxenous lifestyle or monoxenous life cycle depending on how many hosts it feeds on in each cycle. I. pacificus has a four stage life cycle that takes around 3 years to complete. These stages include egg, larva, nymph, and adult. They prefer dense woodland habitats or areas of brush and tall grass.

<i>Babesia bovis</i> Species of single-celled organism

Babesia bovis is an Apicomplexan single-celled parasite of cattle which occasionally infects humans. The disease it and other members of the genus Babesia cause is a hemolytic anemia known as babesiosis and colloquially called Texas cattle fever, redwater or piroplasmosis. It is transmitted by bites from infected larval ticks of the order Ixodida. It was eradicated from the United States by 1943, but is still present in Mexico and much of the world's tropics. The chief vector of Babesia species is the southern cattle fever tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ticks of domestic animals</span>

Ticks of domestic animals directly cause poor health and loss of production to their hosts. Ticks also transmit numerous kinds of viruses, bacteria, and protozoa between domestic animals. These microbes cause diseases which can be severely debilitating or fatal to domestic animals, and may also affect humans. Ticks are especially important to domestic animals in tropical and subtropical countries, where the warm climate enables many species to flourish. Also, the large populations of wild animals in warm countries provide a reservoir of ticks and infective microbes that spread to domestic animals. Farmers of livestock animals use many methods to control ticks, and related treatments are used to reduce infestation of companion animals.

Anaplasma bovis is gram negative, obligate intracellular organism, which can be found in wild and domestic ruminants, and potentially a wide variety of other species. It is one of the last species of the Family Anaplasmaceae to be formally described. It preferentially infects host monocytes, and is often diagnosed via blood smears, PCR, and ELISA. A. bovis is not currently considered zoonotic, and does not frequently cause serious clinical disease in its host. This organism is transmitted by tick vectors, so tick bite prevention is the mainstay of A. bovis control, although clinical infections can be treated with tetracyclines. This organism has a global distribution, with infections noted in many areas, including Korea, Japan, Europe, Brazil, Africa, and North America.

<i>Amblyomma variegatum</i> Species of tick

Amblyomma variegatum, commonly known as the tropical bont tick, is a species of tick of the genus Amblyomma endemic to Africa. It has spread from its centre of origin to several countries, including the Caribbean islands, where it is known as the Senegalese tick and the Antigua gold tick. They are vividly coloured and have a substantial impact on livestock, primarily through their transmission of diseases. They are three-host hard ticks that have been found on a variety of domesticated species such as camels, cattle, goats, sheep, dogs, and various species of wildlife.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flumethrin</span> Chemical compound

Flumethrin is a pyrethroid insecticide. It is used externally in veterinary medicine against parasitic insects and ticks on cattle, sheep, goats, horses, and dogs, and the treatment of parasitic mites in honeybee colonies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mites of livestock</span> Small crawling animals related to ticks and spiders

Mites are small crawling animals related to ticks and spiders. Most mites are free-living and harmless. Other mites are parasitic, and those that infest livestock animals cause many diseases that are widespread, reduce production and profit for farmers, and are expensive to control.

<i>Hyalomma dromedarii</i> Species of tick

Hyalomma dromedarii is a species of hard-bodied ticks belonging to the family Ixodidae.

Haemaphysalis bispinosa is a hard-bodied tick of the genus Haemaphysalis. It is found in India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Pakistan, Nepal, Australia, and Indonesia. It is an obligate ectoparasite of mammals. It is a potential vector of Kyasanur Forest disease virus. These ticks was found parasitized by a chalcid Hunterellus sagarensis in these diseased areas.

<i>Rhipicephalus annulatus</i> Species of tick

Rhipicephalus annulatus, the cattle tick, is a hard-bodied tick of the genus Rhipicephalus. It is also known as North American cattle tick, North American Texas fever tick, and Texas fever tick.

<i>Rhipicephalus pulchellus</i> Species of tick

The zebra tick or yellow back tick is a species of hard tick. It is common in the Horn of Africa, with a habitat of the Rift Valley and eastward. It feeds upon a wide variety of species, including livestock, wild mammals, and humans, and can be a vector for various pathogens. The adult male has a distinctive black and ivory ornamentation on its scutum.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Spickler, Anna Rovid (2022). "Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and R. australis" (PDF). Retrieved 20 March 2024 via The Center for Food Security & Public Health, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6
  3. "Species Details: Rhipicephalus microplus Canestrini, 1888". Catalogue of Life . Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  4. 1 2 3 Tan, Li Peng; Hamdan, Ruhil Hayati; Hassan, Basripuzi Nurul Hayyan; Reduan, Mohd Farhan Hanif; Okene, Ibrahim Abdul-Azeez; Loong, Shih Keng; Khoo, Jing Jing; Samsuddin, Ahmad Syazwan; Lee, Seng Hua (July 2021). "Rhipicephalus Tick: A Contextual Review for Southeast Asia". Pathogens . 10 (7): 821. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070821 . ISSN   2076-0817. PMC   8308476 . PMID   34208961.
  5. Howell, Jeanne M.; Ueti, Massaro W.; Palmer, Guy H.; Scoles, Glen A.; Knowles, Donald P. (October 2007). "Persistently Infected Calves as Reservoirs for Acquisition and Transovarial Transmission of Babesia bovis by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus". Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 45 (10): 3155–3159. doi:10.1128/JCM.00766-07. ISSN   0095-1137. PMC   2045367 . PMID   17687016.
  6. Matysiak, A.; Dudko, P.; Dudek, K.; Dudek, M.; Junkuszew, A.; Tryjanowski, P. (2016-09-13). "The occurrence of pathogens in Rhipicephalus microplus ticks from cattle in Madagascar". Veterinární Medicína . 61 (9): 516–523. doi: 10.17221/59/2016-VETMED .
  7. 1 2 Biguezoton, Abel; Noel, Valerie; Adehan, Safiou; Adakal, Hassane; Dayo, Guiguigbaza-Kossigan; Zoungrana, Sébastien; Farougou, Souaïbou; Chevillon, Christine (2016-06-22). "Ehrlichia ruminantium infects Rhipicephalus microplus in West Africa". Parasites & Vectors . 9 (1): 354. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1651-x . ISSN   1756-3305. PMC   4918008 . PMID   27334439.
  8. Allsopp, Basil A. (2010-02-10). "Natural history of Ehrlichia ruminantium". Veterinary Parasitology . Ticks and Tick-borne Pathogens. 167 (2): 123–135. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.014. hdl: 2263/16002 . ISSN   0304-4017. PMID   19836892.
  9. 1 2 3 Ali, Abid; Parizi, Luís Fernando; Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti; Vaz Junior, Itabajara da Silva (2016-04-19). "A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis". Ciência Rural . 46 (7): 1240–1248. doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151416 . hdl: 10183/147176 . ISSN   0103-8478.
  10. 1 2 Giles, John R.; Peterson, A. Townsend; Busch, Joseph D.; Olafson, Pia U.; Scoles, Glen A.; Davey, Ronald B.; Pound, J. Mathews; Kammlah, Diane M.; Lohmeyer, Kimberly H.; Wagner, David M. (2014-04-17). "Invasive potential of cattle fever ticks in the southern United States". Parasites & Vectors . 7 (1): 189. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-189 . ISSN   1756-3305. PMC   4021724 . PMID   24742062.
  11. "Rhipicephalus spp" . Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  12. Estrada-Peña, A., J. M. Venzal, S. Nava, A. Mangold, A. A. Guglielmone, M. B. Labruna, and J. D. L. Fuente. 2012. Reinstatement of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) australis (Acari: Ixodidae) with redescription of the adult and larval stages. Journal of Medical Entomology 49:794-802.
  13. Earnest I. Smith (August 1918). "Organizing and Conducting State-wide Tick Eradication in Louisiana". Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association . New Series. VI (5): 639. Retrieved July 25, 2013.
  14. Nava, Santiago; Gamietea, Ignacio J.; Morel, Nicolas; Guglielmone, Alberto A.; Estrada-Pena, Agustin (6 July 2022). "Assessment of habitat suitability for the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in temperate areas". Research in Veterinary Science. 150: 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2022.04.020. PMID   35803002. S2CID   250252036.
  15. Senbill, Haytham; Hazarika, Lakshmi Kanta; Baruah, Aiswarya; Borah, Deepak Kumar; Bhattacharyya, Badal; Rahman, Sahidur (2018-06-12). "Life cycle of the southern cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Canestrini 1888 (Acari: Ixodidae) under laboratory conditions". Systematic and Applied Acarology . 23 (6): 1169. doi:10.11158/saa.23.6.12. ISSN   1362-1971. S2CID   89753898.
  16. 1 2 Nicaretta, João Eduardo; dos Santos, Jordana Belos; Couto, Luiz Fellipe Monteiro; Heller, Luciana Maffini; Cruvinel, Leonardo Bueno; de Melo Júnior, Rubens Dias; de Assis Cavalcante, Alliny Souza; Zapa, Dina María Beltrán; Ferreira, Lorena Lopes; de Oliveira Monteiro, Caio Márcio; Soares, Vando Edesio; Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti (2020-08-01). "Evaluation of rotational grazing as a control strategy for Rhipicephalus microplus in a tropical region". Research in Veterinary Science . 131: 92–97. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.04.006. ISSN   0034-5288. PMID   32325299. S2CID   216108204.
  17. Fernández-Salas, A.; Rodríguez-Vivas, R. I.; Alonso-Díaz, M. A.; Basurto-Camberos, H. (2012-11-23). "Ivermectin resistance status and factors associated in Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) populations from Veracruz, Mexico". Veterinary Parasitology . 190 (1): 210–215. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.003. ISSN   0304-4017. PMID   22785128.
  18. 1 2 3 Chatonnet, Arnaud; Lenfant, Nicolas; Marchot, Pascale; Selkirk, Murray E. (2017-04-05). "Natural genomic amplification of cholinesterase genes in animals". Journal of Neurochemistry . International Society for Neurochemistry (Wiley). 142: 73–81. doi:10.1111/jnc.13990. hdl: 10044/1/48129 . ISSN   0022-3042. PMID   28382676. S2CID   34155509.

Further reading

[1] [ clarification needed ]

  1. La especie Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari-Ixodidae) Canestrini, 1888 conocida comúnmente como la garrapata común del bovino, es sin dudas la más dañina de las garrapatas y el más dañino de los ectoparásitos, que afectan al ganado bovino, ya que provoca daños en la piel, anemias, baja condición física, alteraciones reproductivas, decrecimiento en la producción de leche y carne, mortalidad de los animales y parálisis. Además es agente transmisor de hemoparásitos <r<NCBI. National Center for Biotechnology Information. NCBI Taxonomy browser https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/?term=ixodidae.></Barker, S. Murrel, A. 2008. Systematics and evolution of ticks with a list of valid genus and species names. Ticks: Biology disease and control Eds. A. Bowman y P. Nuttal. Cambridge University Press. 39 p.>Nari, A. 1995. Strategies for the control of one-host ticks and relationship with tick-borne diseases in South America. Veterinary Parasitology. 57:153-165>