Spring peeper

Last updated

Contents

Spring peeper
H crucifer USGS.jpg
Status TNC G5.svg
Secure  (NatureServe) [2]
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Hylidae
Genus: Pseudacris
Species:
P. crucifer
Binomial name
Pseudacris crucifer
(Wied-Neuwied, 1838)
Pseudacris crucifer map.svg
Range of P. crucifer
Synonyms
  • Hyla crucifer
    Wied-Neuwied, 1838
  • Hylodes pickeringii
    Holbrook, 1839
  • Acris pickeringii
    — Jan, 1857
  • Hyliola pickeringii
    — Mocquard, 1899
  • Hyla pickeringii
    — Cope, 1899
  • Hyla crucifer
    — Myers, 1927
  • Parapseudacris crucifer
    — Hardy & Borroughs, 1986
  • Pseudacris crucifer
    — Hedges, 1986
  • Hyla crucifer
    — Cocroft, 1994

The spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) [3] is a small chorus frog widespread throughout the eastern United States and Canada. [4] They prefer permanent ponds due to their advantage in avoiding predation; however, they are very adaptable with respect to the habitat they can live in. In northern regions, the frog is able to endure below freezing temperatures due to the capacity of their livers to exude and flush the bloodstream with a glucose cryoprotectant which acts both as an anti-freeze in their blood, and allows organs like the heart to enter into a state of protected dormancy. [5] They are so called because of their chirping call that marks the beginning of spring. Crucifer is derived from the Latin root meaning "cross-bearing". This could be a reference to the cross-like pattern on the spring peeper's dorsal side.

These chirping calls are significant for communication in mating as females choose their mates based on the frequency and volume associated with them. Satellite males who do not make any calls also strategically place themselves near those that make louder calls in an attempt to intercept females.

Temperature plays a large role in when the spring peeper begins breeding as well as the duration of mating. Warm spells result in a massive increased calling rate. [6]

Description

Spring peepers are tan or brown frogs with a dark cross on their dorsa (thus the Latin name crucifer, meaning cross-bearer [7] ), though sometimes the marking may be indistinct. [8] [9] Dark lines can also be found between the eyes and in a crossband on the hindlimbs of P. crucifer. [10] They have a body length between less than 25 mm (0.98 in) to 38 mm (1.5 in) [9] and a mass between 3 and 5 g (0.11 and 0.18 oz). [8]

Unlike some other Pseudacris species, P. crucifer does not have white lines on its lips, but its lips may be lighter than its head. [10]

Anatomy and physiology

The species has large toe pads for climbing, although it is more at home amid the loose debris of the forest floor. [8] Because of its toepads, the spring peeper was once thought to be more closely related to treefrogs than chorus frogs and was placed in the genus Hyla, but it is now in the genus Pseudacris. [10]

The color variations of P. crucifer are mostly tan, brown, yellow, pink, olive green, and gray. [11] All have a slightly pale yellow coloration on the inside of the thighs. Females are lighter-colored, while males are slightly smaller and usually have dark throats. Females have a bulkier abdomen. [12] Skin color of Spring Peepers is also affected by temperature and light. Coloration is dynamic and adaptable in this species. It can be altered quickly, in 15 to 45 minutes, in order to better camouflage from predators. [13]

This frog has a vocal sac that expands and deflates like a balloon to create a short and distinct peeping sound. Only males can make this loud high-pitched noise, and they use it to attract mates.

In the female spring peeper, protruding beyond the lower jaw of the frog sits its snout. Through the use of adhesive pads located on the tips of their non-webbed fingers, spring peepers can stick to particular materials. Males and females are differentiated from one another through the darkening of the skin beneath the jaw in males. Males have a body length ranging from 18–30 millimetres (0.71–1.18 in), and females have a body length ranging from 20–35 millimetres (0.79–1.38 in). [12]

Glands and toxins

In Hyla crucifer males, the blackened pigmentation of the testis affects the seminiferous tubules, the underside of the peritoneum, and the organ itself. The tubules of the testis are surrounded by a pigment layer and a layer of flattened epithelial cells which are located within the surrounding connective tissue. The thickness of an average testis is about 1.10 mm and 2.5 mm in length. The spermatogonia are a cluster of masses jutting out from the tubule lumen. In the late fall, the spermatozoa, located in the seminiferous tubules of the spring peeper, mature and remain there until the spring for breeding. After the seminiferous tubules are emptied, during mating season, the pigmentation of the testis changes from black to a dull grey. [12]

In the spring peeper, most of its energy is used during courtship. Higher energetic costs in female spring peepers are associated with gametogenesis, which occurs before breeding. Stored reserves of fat and glycogen contents can be measured early in the reproductive process to determine the amount used in spring peepers and their correlation to body size. Nonpolar lipid and glycogen content in male spring peepers increased with body mass, whereas in females, it decreased or had minimal variation. [14] The fiber triglyceride and glycogen contents of the female spring peeper's liver increased significantly slower than in males as body mass increased. At the beginning of the breeding season, male spring peepers have more significant amounts of bodily lipid content. Therefore, those that are larger are experiencing lower efficiencies in calling. More reserves of glycogen and lipids are required to maintain calling during the season and require additional rationing of reserves to prepare themselves for courtship. In females, there is a positive correlation between their snout length and wet ovary mass, which also correlates to an increase in body size. [14]

Respiratory and circulatory system

The bigger, older, and more fit male spring peepers are typically superior callers. These types of males utilize citrate synthase and β-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase in their muscles at greater levels. Males with higher calling rates also tend to inhibit larger ventricles and greater concentrations of blood hemoglobin; both the large ventricle size and blood hemoglobin concentrations play a significant role in the speed of oxygen consumption, which is intensely linked to the calling rate. [15] When a male spring peeper calls, the sound is made by the contraction of external and internal oblique muscles which subsequently force air out of the lungs, then move through the larynx to the vocal sac. Of the total body weight of male spring peepers, 15% is made up of the trunk muscles – which contain 2% of lipids in the body by volume – and showcase enzymes with mitochondrial markers. Calls that occur at rapid rates result in prominent energetic costs, which is why stored lipids are the source of 90% of energy applied to calling. [15]

Thermoregulation

Climate plays a major role in the timing of spring peeper breeding: studies have shown a correlation between temperature and the date of first call (when spring peepers start to breed). [16] [17] Though the precise factors affecting breeding timing are complex, there has been a trend towards earlier breeding as average temperatures have increased since the early 20th century. [17] [18]

Another impact of temperature is the duration of mating calls. There is a negative relationship between the length of mating calls and throat temperature. However, male spring peepers with superior calling frequencies are positively related to throat temperature. The temperature of the surrounding environment of spring peepers also plays a role in the rate of calls, which is positively associated with the success of males during the mating and breeding period, showing that increasing site and throat temperatures result in increasing dominant frequency. [19]

Spring peepers are known to tolerate freezing temperatures by producing a glucose-based cryoprotectant to limit cell shrinkage and prevent cell freezing. [20]

Geographic range and habitat

The southern spring peeper's habitat includes the Gulf Coast from southeastern Texas to southeastern Georgia and northern Florida, United States. Its northern conspecific occurs in the entire east of the Mississippi and ranges to the Atlantic provinces in Canada as far west as Saskatchewan. [21] [4] [8] [22] [18]

During the breeding season, the spring peeper will be found near ponds and usually located in bodies of water that are free of fish and pollutants. During actual breeding, their choruses form near where trees hang by bushy plants or secondary forests. Their choruses can also be located within ponds, marshes, or swamps. They will usually resume call activity during warm rain, and are not commonly seen outside of their breeding choruses. During the non-breeding season, they will inhabit dead plant material from trees, shrubs, and other plants in the woods. [23]

Spring peepers are often found in temporary ponds (which eventually dry during the summer months), intermediate ponds that have interchanging periods of being dry and wet every year, or in customarily filled ponds year-round. Although they are able to inhabit multiple types of ponds, spring peepers have been seen to be superior competitors in permanent ponds due to their higher caliber of predation resistance within the environment. [24] Spring peepers live primarily in forests and regenerating woodlands near ephemeral or semipermanent wetlands. [22] This amphibious species requires marshes, ponds, or swamp regions to support the aquatic environment the eggs and tadpoles need.

In the northern reaches of their range, spring peepers must endure occasional periods of subfreezing temperatures during the breeding season. The species can tolerate the freezing of some of its body fluids, and undergoes hibernation under logs or behind loose bark on trees. [8] It is capable of surviving the freezing of its internal body fluids to temperatures as low as −8 °C (17.6 °F). [25] This species frequently occurs in breeding aggregations of several hundred individuals, and commonly breeds in many small wetlands, including swamps and temporary pools and disturbed habitats, such as farm ponds and borrow pits. [22] [26]

Home range and territoriality

The mating displays of male spring peepers vary with different environmental factors: humidity and vegetation density. These factors play a significant role in the arboreal behavior and nature of spring peepers during mating. At sites with higher humidity and air temperature, there is increased dominance of arboreal behavior, which showcases that latitude may play a role. [27] Spring peepers who reside in areas of warmer temperatures tend to exhibit arboreal behavior to greater extents compared to those in environments of lower temperatures. When comparing the improvement of mating calls in males, calls from above ground compared to those near the ground showcased better results. Local vegetation may also play a role in the betterment of arboreal calling compared to calling from lower levels due to the spatial aspects interrupting the call. [27]

Spring peepers almost always migrate at night. [28] This is most likely to prevent drying out.

Diet

Larva (tadpole)

Tadpoles are suspension feeders, therefore they graze on inorganic and organic matter. [29] They also feed on algae and other organisms in the water. Their predators include great diving beetle larvae (when in tadpole form), snakes, skunks, and larger frogs. [30]

Adult

Spring peepers are nocturnal insectivores, emerging at night to feed primarily on small invertebrates, such as beetles, ants, flies, and spiders. [8] They do not climb high into trees, but hunt in low vegetation. Spring peepers living in deep, damp forests are active hunters both day and night, whereas those found in woodland edges restrict most hunting and other activity to night. [9] The spring peeper's diet involves the filtering of particles from water columns and scouring periphyton and detritus (dead, organic matter) from environmental surfaces in their habitat. [31]

Reproduction and lifecycle

Spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) eggs in water. Spring Peeper Eggs.jpg
Spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) eggs in water.

Brood size

Spring peepers breed in southern areas from October to March, depending on the local temperature. In northern areas, they breed between March and June, when the warm rains start. P. crucifer typically lays around 900 eggs per clutch, but up to 1000 are possible. Females will lay eggs singularly or in groups of two or three. [32] Egg clusters are hidden under vegetation or debris at the water base. [33]

Lifespan

Tadpole 2015-04-16-12.04.26 ZS PMax (16571152244) (2) Tadpole 2015-04-16-12.04.26 ZS PMax (16571152244) (2).jpg
Tadpole 2015-04-16-12.04.26 ZS PMax (16571152244) (2)

After they hatch, they remain tadpoles for two to three months before transforming into frogs and are ready to leave the water. [33] Following breeding in the spring, the spring peepers' larval stage lasts two to three months. [31] The spring peeper can live an estimated three years in the wild. [34]

By looking at the different shading/coloring of concentric rings in the skeletons of spring peepers, age can be determined regarding the way of bone growth. Darker lines coincide with periods of higher survival rates during winter months. Lighter lines and areas represent periods of bone deposition and rapid growth. [35] These lines allow it to be determined that spring peepers begin to breed, going into their third spring when they are two years old. Male spring peepers have reached sexual maturity at this time yet are smaller in size than females. Between spring peepers' second and third years, their body size increases significantly, then subsequently plateaus. During the first season of breeding, the two-year-old males produce higher frequency calls than males in their third and fourth seasons do [35]

P. c. crucifer tadpoles, about 4-5 wk old and 24 hours away from complete metamorphosis. Spring Peeper tadpoles.jpg
P. c. crucifer tadpoles, about 4–5 wk old and 24 hours away from complete metamorphosis.

Mating

Mate searching behavior

Gnome-mime-sound-openclipart.svg
Single spring peeper calling
The call in relative isolation from others.
Collective spring peepers calling
A few hundred in a single pond.
Problems playing these files? See media help.

As their common name implies, the spring peeper has a high-pitched call similar to that of a young chicken, only much louder and rising slightly in tone. They are among the first frogs in the regions to call in the spring. [36] Unlike A. americanus and P. feriarum whose call activity is dependent on seasonality, 63% of variance in P. crucifer call is explained by temperature. [6] Calling rate can be modified by interactions among neighboring males, which tend to alternate calls with one another. [6] The mating calls of the spring peeper consist of a sound very similar to a "peep" and are repeated by males up to 13,500 times per night. [15] As a chorus, they resemble the sounds of sleigh bells. [37] They are heard early in spring not long after the ice melts on the wetlands. [9] The males usually call from the edges of the bodies of water in which they breed, hidden near the bases of shrubs or grasses. Even when calling, they may be difficult to locate and are most easily seen when in amplexus in the shallows. As in other frogs, an aggressive call is made when densities are high. This call is a rising trill closely resembling the breeding call of the southern chorus frog (Pseudacris nigrita nigrita). [22]

Female/male interactions

Courting

Spring Peeper mating Spring Peeper mating.jpg
Spring Peeper mating

Females choose mates based on the speed and volume of these male calls. Interestingly, females also discriminate between distinct genetic lineages, with females preferring males of their own lineage, [38] possibly due to the detrimental effects of hybridization. [39] Older, larger males tend to have faster and louder calls that are preferred by the females. A segment of the male population, known as 'satellite males' do not make these calls, but instead position themselves near loud males and attempt to intercept females drawn in by these calls. [40] Males can switch between satellite-ing and calling. The satellite tactic is not associated with size or inferiority. [20] Males normally call between 15 and 25 times per minute to attract mates starting in the evening and continuing through the night. [18] Though only weighing a few grams, the Spring Peeper can produce a call as loud as songbirds that weigh 10-100 times as much. [41] Male spring peepers have also been found to increase the duration and frequency of aggressive calls in response to increased calling intensity from others. [42] These satellite males are also known to circumvent female choice and increase rates of hybridization between spring peeper lineages. [43] Males produce both advertisement calls, long-range calls that signal a male's position to other males and to attract females, and courtship calls, short-range calls that are directed toward nearby females to inform them that the male is ready to mate. [20]

A male, spring peeper with its vocal sac inflated as it performs its mating call. Spring peeper male mating.jpg
A male, spring peeper with its vocal sac inflated as it performs its mating call.

Mate choice

It has been established that the mating call of male spring peepers acts as an etiological isolating mechanism. As a potential agent of sexual selection, the mating call has many variations that may come into play as a major factor in mate choice by females. During mating, females monitor body size in correlation to the frequency of calls in an inverse matter. [35] The basilar papilla of the inner ear is responsible for decoding and detecting mating calls. The basilar papilla units within the female ear are tuned between 2100 and 3700 Hz and are dependent on intensity. Females tend to select low-frequency calls over high-frequency ones because the calls at the lower end of the spectrum are easier to detect. [35] The calls of spring peepers are often repeated, which has been deemed essential concerning the evolution of the mate choice of females reacting to particular mating and courtship behavior. [19]

Enemies

Spring peepers encounter enemies in their natural environments early in their development. Compared to intermediate or temporary ponds, permanent ponds host a large abundance of tadpoles and larger predators. Drying periods of ponds typically align before or during the metamorphic larval stage of spring peepers due to their slower growth rates. This suggests that higher mortality rates may be an effect. [44] Salamanders and particular kinds of fish are seen to have profound impacts on the survivorship of spring peeper tadpoles. Each type of pond typically hosts different predators: temporary ponds host beetle larvae and dragonflies, intermediate ponds host salamanders and beetle larvae, and permanent ponds host fishes and dragonfly larvae. Each predator plays a role as a potential predator to the spring peeper, depending on which type of pond they inhabit. [44]

Spring peeper larvae are thought to be poor competitors in environments where other anurans are present. This is typically due to the larval spring peepers' small size and lower levels of activity. The small size of the larval allows them to be able to deal with their depressed resource density. Larval spring peepers harvest smaller amounts of resources, resulting in them having lower metabolic costs and a maintained growth rate. Spring peepers are said to occupy locations where predators have previously gotten ridden of bigger competitors. [31]

Conservation status

The spring peeper has no special status in most areas. They are common and widespread in the eastern regions. However, their habitats change quickly due to loss of wetlands. In some areas, their populations have decreased significantly. [37]

The species is listed as threatened in both Iowa [37] and Kansas. [45]

Taxonomy

There are currently two subspecies recognized, although detailed genetic and behavioral analysis demonstrates they likely are not taxonomically accurate: [38] [46]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ornate chorus frog</span> Species of amphibian

The ornate chorus frog is a species of chorus frog endemic to the Southeastern United States. Their distribution ranges from North Carolina, east to the very eastern part of Louisiana, and south to northern parts of Florida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American bullfrog</span> Species of amphibian

The American bullfrog, often simply known as the bullfrog in Canada and the United States, is a large true frog native to eastern North America. It typically inhabits large permanent water bodies such as swamps, ponds, and lakes. Bullfrogs can also be found in manmade habitats such as pools, koi ponds, canals, ditches and culverts. The bullfrog gets its name from the sound the male makes during the breeding season, which sounds similar to a bull bellowing. The bullfrog is large and is commonly eaten throughout its range, especially in the southern United States where they are plentiful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common frog</span> Species of amphibian

The common frog or grass frog, also known as the European common frog, European common brown frog, European grass frog, European Holarctic true frog, European pond frog or European brown frog, is a semi-aquatic amphibian of the family Ranidae, found throughout much of Europe as far north as Scandinavia and as far east as the Urals, except for most of the Iberian Peninsula, southern Italy, and the southern Balkans. The farthest west it can be found is Ireland. It is also found in Asia, and eastward to Japan. The nominative, and most common, subspecies Rana temporaria temporaria is a largely terrestrial frog native to Europe. It is distributed throughout northern Europe and can be found in Ireland, the Isle of Lewis and as far east as Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wood frog</span> Species of amphibian

Lithobates sylvaticus or Rana sylvatica, commonly known as the wood frog, is a frog species that has a broad distribution over North America, extending from the boreal forest of the north to the southern Appalachians, with several notable disjunct populations including lowland eastern North Carolina. The wood frog has garnered attention from biologists because of its freeze tolerance, relatively great degree of terrestrialism, interesting habitat associations, and relatively long-range movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American green tree frog</span> Species of amphibian

The American green tree frog is a common arboreal species of New World tree frog belonging to the family Hylidae. This nocturnal insectivore is moderately sized and has a bright green to reddish-brown coloration. Commonly found in the central and southeastern United States, the frog lives in open canopy forests with permanent water sources and abundant vegetation. When defending its territory, the frog either emits aggressive call signals or resolves to grapple with intruders, seldom leading to injury or death. To avoid predation, the frog will leap into the water or jump into the treetops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific tree frog</span> Species of amphibian

The Pacific tree frog, also known as the Pacific chorus frog, has a range spanning the Pacific Northwest, from Northern California, Oregon, and Washington to British Columbia in Canada and extreme southern Alaska. They live from sea level to more than 10,000 feet in many types of habitats, reproducing in aquatic settings. They occur in shades of greens or browns and can change colors over periods of hours and weeks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common parsley frog</span> Species of amphibian

The common parsley frog is a species of frog in the genus Pelodytes. It lives in the Iberian region of southwestern Europe. Its earliest identification is believed to be from 1802.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moor frog</span> Species of amphibian

The moor frog is a slim, reddish-brown, semiaquatic amphibian native to Europe and Asia. Moor frogs are known for their ability to freeze solid and survive thawing. The frog makes use of various cryoprotectants i.e. antifreeze that decrease its internal freezing temperature. The species is distributed over a large range, covering a significant portion of Eurasia. Male moor frogs are known to turn blue temporarily during the height of mating season. This coloration is assumed to signal a mate's fitness. Moor frogs typically mate through multimale amplexus a form of polyandry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern cricket frog</span> Species of amphibian

The northern cricket frog is a species of small hylid frog native to the United States and northeastern Mexico. These frogs are majorly in grey, green, and brown color with blotching patterns. Many have a brown or orange stripe down the center of their back and a triangular marking on the top of their head. Despite being members of the tree frog family, they are not arboreal. These frogs prefer habitats near the edges of slow-moving bodies of water, and in close proximity to shelter items, like rocks. It has two recognized subspecies, A. c. crepitans and A. c. paludicola.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gray treefrog</span> Species of amphibian

The gray treefrog is a species of small arboreal holarctic tree frog native to much of the eastern United States and southeastern Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Italian agile frog</span> Species of amphibian

The Italian agile frog, also known as Lataste's frog, is a species of frog in the family Ranidae. The species is native to southern Europe, primarily found in the Po River Basin of Italy. It is one of the most endangered amphibian species in Europe, with its populations declining sharply in recent years, and has been the focus of multiple conservation plans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boreal chorus frog</span> Species of amphibian

The boreal chorus frog is a species of chorus frog native to Canada from central Quebec to eastern British Columbia and north to the Northwest Territories and the southern portion of the Yukon. It occurs in the USA throughout Montana, northwestern Wisconsin, northeastern Arizona, northern New Mexico, and southwestern Utah.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Western chorus frog</span> Species of amphibian

The western chorus frog, also known as striped chorus frog, or midland chorus frog is a species of frog found in Canada and the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Upland chorus frog</span> Species of amphibian

The upland chorus frog is a species of chorus frog found in the United States. It was recently separated from the Western chorus frog, being identified as an individual species rather than a subspecies. They are a rarely seen species, but their calls are frequently heard soon after rains in the spring time.

<i>Dryophytes gratiosus</i> Species of amphibian

Dryophytes gratiosus, commonly known as the barking tree frog, is a species of tree frog endemic to the south-eastern United States. Formerly known as Hyla gratiosa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama cross-banded tree frog</span> Species of amphibian

The Panama cross-banded tree frog or pug-nosed tree frog is a species of frog in the family Hylidae found in the humid Pacific lowlands of southwestern Costa Rica to eastern Panama and in the Caribbean lowlands of Panama and northern Colombia. Males of the species utilize synchronous calling to hide their position from predators. Females create basins during amplexus and deposit fertilized eggs onto the surface of the water.

Hyperolius nitidulus is a species of frog from the family Hyperoliidae. It is found on the West African savannas between Guinea and Mali in the west and Nigeria and Cameroon in the east. Common name plain reed frog has been coined for it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Túngara frog</span> Species of amphibian

The Túngara frog is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is a small nocturnal terrestrial frog found in Mexico, Central America, and the northeastern regions of South America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quacking frog</span> Species of amphibian

The quacking frog, also known as the red-thighed froglet due to its legs tending to be bright red, is a species of frog from the Myobatrachidae family and is in a clad with five other species. The frog is well known for the sound it produces which resembles a quack. It has up to 11 notes and can change the notes in their call. It has larger testes compared to other frogs within the genus and has started to be used in experiments. This frog is found in southwest Australia. It is found in ponds and pools and other moisture filled areas. These frogs engage in polyandry and can result in multiple paternity of its offspring. Additionally, the tadpoles of this species can change the rate they metamorphosize depending on the conditions. The males tend to have larger arm girth and can adopt different mating strategies depending on size. The mating strategy is dependent on male density. The frogs also vary in terms of colour and texture of its skin. The tadpoles are generally golden with transparent tails.

<i>Lithobates clamitans</i> Species of amphibian

Lithobates clamitans or Rana clamitans, commonly known as the green frog, is a species of frog native to eastern North America. The two subspecies are the bronze frog and the northern green frog.

References

  1. ↑ IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2022). "Pseudacris crucifer". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2022: e.T55892A193392474. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2022-1.RLTS.T55892A193392474.en . Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  2. ↑ "Pseudacris crucifer". NatureServe Explorer. Retrieved 17 April 2024.
  3. ↑ ITIS Pseudacris crucifer (Integrated Taxonomic Information System). www.itis.gov.
  4. 1 2 "Northern Spring Peeper / Rainette Crucifère". Opinicon Natural History. 2009-09-17. Retrieved 2021-03-19.
  5. ↑ Schmid, William D. (1982-02-05). "Survival of Frogs in Low Temperature". Science. 215 (4533): 697–698. Bibcode:1982Sci...215..697S. doi:10.1126/science.7058335. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   7058335.
  6. 1 2 3 Wells, Kentwood D.; Taigen, Theodore L.; O'Brien, Jennifer A. (1996-01-01). "The effect of temperature on calling energetics of the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer)". Amphibia-Reptilia. 17 (2): 149–158. doi:10.1163/156853896X00180. ISSN   1568-5381.
  7. ↑ "Crucifer | Search Online Etymology Dictionary".
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Spring Peeper Profile". National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on June 14, 2007. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  9. 1 2 3 4 LeClere, Jeff. "Spring Peeper – Pseudacris crucifer". HerpNet. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  10. 1 2 3 Powell, Robert (2016). Peterson Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America (4th ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 140.
  11. ↑ Tipton, Bob L., and Bob L. Tipton. Texas Amphibians a Field Guide. 1st ed., University of Texas Press, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7560/737358.
  12. 1 2 3 Rugh, Roberts (1941). "Experimental Studies on the Reproductive Physiology of the Male Spring Peeper, Hyla Crucifer". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 84 (5): 617–632. JSTOR   984843.
  13. ↑ Kats, Lee B.; van Dragt, Randall G. (1986). "Background Color-Matching in the Spring Peeper, Hyla crucifer". Copeia. 1986 (1): 109–115. doi:10.2307/1444895. JSTOR   1444895.
  14. 1 2 Duffitt, Ashley D.; Finkler, Michael S. (2011). "Sex-Related Differences in Somatic Stored Energy Reserves of Pseudacris crucifer and Pseudacris triseriata during the Early Breeding Season". Journal of Herpetology. 45 (2): 224–229. doi:10.1670/09-263.1. JSTOR   41415272. S2CID   83807187.
  15. 1 2 3 Zimmitti, Salvatore J. (November 1999). "Individual Variation in Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Features Associated with Calling in Spring Peepers (Pseudacris crucifer)". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 72 (6): 666–676. doi:10.1086/316706. PMID   10603330. S2CID   34950753.
  16. ↑ Blaustein, Andrew R.; Belden, Lisa K.; Olson, Deanna H.; Green, David M.; Root, Terry L.; Kiesecker, Joseph M. (14 December 2001). "Amphibian Breeding and Climate Change". Conservation Biology. 15 (6): 1804–1809. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00307.x . hdl: 2027.42/75127 . S2CID   26685121.
  17. 1 2 Gibbs, James P.; Breisch, Alvin R. (2001). "Climate Warming and Calling Phenology of Frogs near Ithaca, New York, 1900–1999". Conservation Biology. 15 (4): 1175–1178. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041175.x. JSTOR   3061337. S2CID   86182135.
  18. 1 2 3 Lovett, Gary M. (June 2013). "When Do Peepers Peep? Climate and the Date of First Calling in the Spring Peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) in Southeastern New York State". Northeastern Naturalist. 20 (2): 333–340. doi:10.1656/045.020.0209. S2CID   86691153.
  19. 1 2 Sullivan, Brian K.; Hinshaw, Steven H. (1990-12-31). "Variation in Advertisement Calls and Male Calling Behavior in the Spring Peeper (Pseudacris crucifer)". Copeia. 1990 (4): 1146. doi:10.2307/1446500. JSTOR   1446500.
  20. 1 2 3 Ethier, Jeffrey P.; Fayard, Aurore; Soroye, Peter; Choi, Daeun; Mazerolle, Marc J.; Trudeau, Vance L. (2021-08-27). "Life history traits and reproductive ecology of North American chorus frogs of the genus Pseudacris (Hylidae)". Frontiers in Zoology. 18 (1): 40. doi: 10.1186/s12983-021-00425-w . ISSN   1742-9994. PMC   8394169 . PMID   34452622.
  21. ↑ Rashleigh, Karen R., & Michael Crowell. “Spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) in Labrador, Canada: An update.” The Canadian Field-Naturalist, vol. 132, no. 2, 1 Jan. 2019, pp. 163–167, https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v132i2.2051.
  22. 1 2 3 4 "Spring Peeper". U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 2009-11-15.
  23. ↑ Stewart, Kathryn (4 March 2013). Contact zone dynamics and the evolution of reproductive isolation in a North American treefrog, the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) (Thesis). hdl:1974/7841. ProQuest   1886372286.
  24. ↑ Skelly, David K. (1997). "Tadpole Communities: Pond permanence and predation are powerful forces shaping the structure of tadpole communities". American Scientist. 85 (1): 36–45. JSTOR   27856689.
  25. ↑ Layne, Jr; Lee, Re (1995). "Adaptations of frogs to survive freezing". Climate Research. 5 (1): 53–59. Bibcode:1995ClRes...5...53L. doi: 10.3354/cr005053 . hdl:2374.MIA/5875. JSTOR   24863316.
  26. ↑ "Spring Peeper (Psuedocris crucifer". Wildlife Journal Junior. New Hampshire PBS. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  27. 1 2 Cicchino, Amanda S; Cairns, Nicholas A; Bulté, Grégory; Lougheed, Stephen C (2019-10-07). Taborsky, Michael (ed.). "High and dry: Trade-off in arboreal calling in a treefrog mediated by local environment". Behavioral Ecology: arz169. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arz169 .
  28. ↑ Todd, Brian D.; Winne, Christopher T. (May 2006). "Ontogenetic and interspecific variation in timing of movement and responses to climatic factors during migrations by pond-breeding amphibians". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 84 (5): 715–722. doi:10.1139/z06-054. ISSN   0008-4301.
  29. ↑ "Virginia Herpetological Society". www.virginiaherpetologicalsociety.com. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
  30. ↑ "Spring Peeper Pseudacris crucifer". Wildlife Journal Junior. New Hampshire PBS. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  31. 1 2 3 Skelly, David K. (1995). "Competition and the Distribution of Spring Peeper Larvae". Oecologia. 103 (2): 203–207. Bibcode:1995Oecol.103..203S. doi:10.1007/BF00329081. JSTOR   4221021. PMID   28306774. S2CID   22425047.
  32. ↑ Baud, Donald R.; Beck, Melvin L. (2005). "Interactive Effects of UV-B and Copper on Spring Peeper Tadpoles (Pseudacris Crucifer)". Southeastern Naturalist (Steuben, Me.). 4 (1): 15–22. doi:10.1656/1528-7092(2005)004[0015:IEOUAC]2.0.CO;2. S2CID   83788323 – via BioOne.
  33. 1 2 "BioKIDS – Kids' Inquiry of Diverse Species, Pseudacris crucifer, Spring Peeper: INFORMATION". www.biokids.umich.edu. Retrieved 2019-03-20. In very cold weather, they hibernate under logs and loose bark. Spring peepers often call day and night as long as the temperature is above freezing, but they are mostly heard and usually not seen because they hide in dense plants. They are especially easy to hear due to their extremely loud mating call which gives them the name "peeper", but it is often hard to pinpoint the source of the sound, especially when many are peeping at once. The peepers generally breed close to dusk and throughout the evening and early morning hours. Their calls can be heard from as far as one to two and a half miles, depending on their numbers. "Spring Peeper". National Geographic. 11 November 2010.
  34. ↑ "Spring Peeper National Geographic". Animals. 11 November 2010. Archived from the original on May 7, 2017.
  35. 1 2 3 4 Lykens, David V.; Forester, Don C. (1987). "Age Structure in the Spring Peeper: Do Males Advertise Longevity?". Herpetologica. 43 (2): 216–223. JSTOR   3892054.
  36. ↑ "Pseudacris crucifer". Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
  37. 1 2 3 "Spring Peeper". The Regents of the University of Michigan. BioKIDS. Retrieved 19 November 2009.
  38. 1 2 3 Stewart, K. A.; Austin, J. D.; Zamudio, K. R.; Lougheed, S. C. (February 2016). "Contact zone dynamics during early stages of speciation in a chorus frog (Pseudacris crucifer)". Heredity. 116 (2): 239–247. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.96 . PMC   4806893 . PMID   26626576.
  39. ↑ Stewart, Kathryn A.; Lougheed, Stephen C. (2013). "Testing for intraspecific postzygotic isolation between cryptic lineages of Pseudacris crucifer". Ecology and Evolution. 3 (14): 4621–4630. doi:10.1002/ece3.851. PMC   3867898 . PMID   24363891.
  40. ↑ Harding, James H. (1997). Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes Region. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. p. 133. ISBN   978-0-472-09628-2.
  41. ↑ Lovett, Gary M. “When Do Peepers Peep? Climate and the Date of First Calling in the Spring Peeper (Pseudacris Crucifer) in Southeastern New York State.” Northeastern Naturalist, vol. 20, no. 2, 2013, pp. 333–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43287117. Accessed 12 Feb. 2024.
  42. ↑ Schwartz, Joshua J. (1989). "Graded Aggressive Calls of the Spring Peeper, Pseudacris crucifer". Herpetologica. 45 (2): 172–181. JSTOR   3892159.
  43. ↑ Stewart, K. A.; Hudson, C. M.; Lougheed, S. C. (2017). "Can alternative mating tactics facilitate introgression across a hybrid zone by circumventing female choice?". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 30 (2): 412–421. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13017 . PMID   27862550. S2CID   42215306.
  44. 1 2 Skelly, David K. (1996-08-01). "Pond Drying, Predators, and the Distribution of Pseudacris Tadpoles". Copeia. 1996 (3): 599–605. doi:10.2307/1447523. JSTOR   1447523.
  45. ↑ "Pseudacris crucifer". The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors. Retrieved 19 November 2009.
  46. ↑ Cairns, N.A.; Cicchino, A.S.; Stewart, K.A.; Austin, J.D.; Lougheed, S.C. (March 2021). "Cytonuclear discordance, reticulation and cryptic diversity in one of North America's most common frogs". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 156: 107042. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107042. PMID   33338660. S2CID   229324658.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.