Administrator of an estate

Last updated

The administrator of an estate is a legal term referring to a person appointed by a court to administer the estate of a deceased person who left no will. [1] Where a person dies intestate, i.e., without a will, the court may appoint a person to settle their debts, pay any necessary taxes and funeral expenses, and distribute the remainder according to the procedure set down by law. Such a person is known as the administrator of the estate and will enjoy similar powers to those of an executor under a will.

Contents

Overview

Once an individual dies, their estate must pass through the estate process. This process, conducted in a state or local probate court, involves the disposition of the decedent’s estate either by will or intestacy. Often, to facilitate this process, the Court will appoint an Administrator of the Estate. The Court tasks this administrator with managing the decedent’s estate—which includes collecting the decedent’s assets, paying off all necessary debts, and distributing the remains to the decedent’s heirs. [2] However, these Administrators do not hold unlimited responsibilities but rather derive all of their power solely from the probate court. Thus, once the Administrator properly disposes of the estate, their role ceases to exist. [3]

Administrator eligibility

A court will appoint an estate administrator only when either the decedent died without a will, the decedent failed to name an executor in their will, or a named executor is unable or unwilling to perform their duties. [4] Generally, while any person may serve as an Administrator of an Estate, probate courts are limited by state statute or common law as to whom they may select. Some of the most common restrictions will be provided below. So although the information below provides general overview of general formalities, it's best to consult a particular state’s relevant statutes for further guidance.

Preferred parties

In some states, statute requires probate courts to appoint an administrator from a selected “preferred party list.” [5] A preferred party could range from the decedent's surviving widow to a surviving cousin. To provide an example, see the District of Columbia’s preferred party statute: “If the intestate leave[s] a widow or surviving husband and a child or children, administration, subject to the discretion of the court, should be granted either to the widow or surviving husband or to the child, or one or more of the children qualified to act as Administrator." [6] While some states allow probate courts to stray from this preferred list, most are required to pick from the restricted pool unless all preferred parties waive the right to be administrator.

Competency of an administrator

Before an Administrator may be appointed, they must first be determined competent. This competency, no different from competency in other legal matters, derived from the common law’s requirement that administrators be free from any mental condition that would impair their ability to serve the best interests of the estate. [7] Today, almost all states adopt this common law standard with some extending its boundaries to include physical impairments as well. It is important to note however that a Court cannot base their competency determination on general factors such as age or mobility. Rather, the Court or a petition party must establish specific mental or physical impairments that will almost certainly impair the administrators judgment (things such as dementia, cerebral palsy, or a traumatic brain injury). [8]

Adversely interested parties

Probate courts may refuse to appoint individuals as administrators if they possess an adverse interest to the estate. [9] The exact definition of an “adverse interest” falls entirely on a strict case-by-case factual inquiry. For instance, generally, the fact that an individual also serves as a beneficiary of an estate does not bar them from serving as an administrator. Instead, courts are required to assess all circumstances regarding an administrator’s adverse interest and determine whether these interests are egregious enough to require disqualification. [9] While not representative of a de-facto rule, many state courts found the following circumstances egregiously adverse: Parties who actively contest a will cannot serve as administrators; Parties asserting ownership of real or personal property cannot serve as administrators; Parties involved in other litigation regarding the decedent’s estate cannot serve as administrators. [10]

Strangers to the estate

While courts may be disposed to approve preferred parties of the estate, they are generally not limited from appointing “strangers” of the estate. Courts generally define “stranger” of an estate as an individual unrelated, by either blood or marriage, to the decedent and one without any interest in the decedent’s estate. [4] Judges and scholars view these “strangers” as more desirable administrators because they, unlike preferred parties, will not clouded in their decision-making by any personal interest. [4] Regardless, outside a statutory preferred-party requirement, probate courts are free to appoint any “stranger” as estate administrators

While this may not demonstrate an exhaustive list of all statutory limitations on the appointment of administrators, they represent a thread of common factors probate courts must review in their appointment decisions.

Powers of an administrator

Generally, administrators possess a wide range of powers when disposing of a decedent's estate. These include: collection of assets, payment of debts to creditors, sale of real estate/personal property, and final disposition of assets to heirs. Some of the most common and vital powers an administrator holds are:

Collection of an estate's assets

Once appointed by the court, an administrator must first collect all of a decedent's assets and prepare an inventory for the probate court. This inventory includes all real and personal property owned by the decedent, remaining balances in banking accounts, 401ks, insurance payments, and much more. Once the administrator properly submits this inventory before the probate court, they may proceed into paying creditors, settling remaining debts, and eventually disposing of the assets to the appropriate heirs. [11]

Payments to creditors

After properly inventorying the estate, an administrator must then pay all creditors of the decedent's estate. But, the administrator does not actively seek out the decedent's creditors. Rather, after moving through the proper channels of probate court, creditors will attach their claims to the decedent's estate. After the claim attaches, the probate court (and the administrator) will filter through the claims to determine if any are improper. If improper, the claim will be "thrown out" and not charged against the estate. If deemed proper, the administrator will be required to pay the debt out of the estate's assets—which they've already inventoried. If any assets remain after payments to creditors, the balance will be distributed amongst the decedent's heirs (as described below). [12]

Filing paperwork to the probate court

In addition to filing the inventory, administrators must submit a wide array of paperwork to properly administer a decedent's estate. For instance, in New Jersey, an administrator must file the decedent's will (if they have one), affidavits of surviving spouses regarding the existence of a will, affidavits of existing real property, deeds of distribution, applications for administration, and much more. [13] Often, the required paperwork varies from state to state, so an administrator must check their local jurisdiction—or contact a local attorney—to confirm the requirements under state law.

Sale of real estate and personal property

Dependent on the jurisdiction, administrators hold the power to both sell and lease a decedent's real and personal property. For instance, a decedent may request the deed of their apartment building be transferred to their surviving spouse. But before that transfer, the apartment building remains functioning and must be tended to by the administrator. And so, under the title, an administrator may continue to lease that property and collect disbursements of rent until they properly transfer the deed. In addition, an administrator may sell the building, after approval from the probate court, to pay any remaining debts on the decedent's estate. [11]

Disposition of assets to heirs

After inventorying the estate and paying all creditors, an administrator is now able to close the estate and disburse the remaining assets to the decedent's heirs. If the decedent died with a will, the administrator will disburse the assets as requested by the decedent. If the decedent died without a will, then the administrator must disburse the assets according to state or federal statute. For instance, under the New Jersey Intestacy statute, the decedent's estate must be distributed entirely to a decedent's surviving spouse. [14] Either way, the administrator must disburse the assets according to either a will or intestacy law; they do not retain full discretion to disburse as they please. [15]

Regardless of the actions an administrator wants to take, they should always consult a local probate court or attorney regarding their jurisdictions requirements and powers.

Removal of an administrator

An administrator of an estate may always be removed either by petition or appeal. For instance, once a Court appoints an Administrator, any interested party may appeal the court’s appointment. The appeal, of course, must possess merit; the party may cite improper judgement by the Court or claim another individual possessed mandatory entitlement to appointment. [16] Either way, an appellate court always holds the power to reverse any administrator appointment made by the probate court.

Outside the appeals process, an administrator may always be removed for failure to fulfill their statutory duties. [17] For instance, an administrator possesses a fiduciary duty to obtain the highest price for the sale of the estate’s property. Were an administrator to sell property at below market value to a close friend, they could be removed as administrator for failing their fiduciary duty (i.e., failing to obtain the highest price for sale). [18] In short, a court may always remove an administrator after it determines an administrator failed to satisfy their statutory or fiduciary duties.  

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trust (law)</span> Three-party fiduciary relationship

A trust is a legal relationship in which the owner of property, or any transferable right, gives it to another to manage and use solely for the benefit of a designated person. In the English common law, the party who entrusts the property is known as the "settlor", the party to whom it is entrusted is known as the "trustee", the party for whose benefit the property is entrusted is known as the "beneficiary", and the entrusted property is known as the "corpus" or "trust property". A testamentary trust is an irrevocable trust established and funded pursuant to the terms of a deceased person's will. An inter vivos trust is a trust created during the settlor's life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Will and testament</span> Legal declaration by which a person distributes their property at death

A will and testament is a legal document that expresses a person's (testator) wishes as to how their property (estate) is to be distributed after their death and as to which person (executor) is to manage the property until its final distribution. For the distribution (devolution) of property not determined by a will, see inheritance and intestacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intestacy</span> Dying without leaving a will

Intestacy is the condition of the estate of a person who dies without a legally valid will, resulting in the distribution of their estate under statutory intestacy laws rather than by their expressed wishes. Alternatively this may also apply where a will or declaration has been made, but only applies to part of the estate; the remaining estate forms the "intestate estate". Intestacy law, also referred to as the law of descent and distribution, which vary by jurisdiction, refers to the body of law, establish a hierarchy for inheritance, typically prioritizing close relatives such as spouses, children, and then extended family members and determines who is entitled to the property from the estate under the rules of inheritance.

In common law and statutory law, a life estate is the ownership of immovable property for the duration of a person's life. In legal terms, it is an estate in real property that ends at death, when the property rights may revert to the original owner or to another person. The owner of a life estate is called a "life tenant". The person who will take over the rights upon death is said to have a "remainder" interest and is known as a "remainderman".

An executor is someone who is responsible for executing, or following through on, an assigned task or duty. The feminine form, executrix, may sometimes be used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Probate</span> Proving of a will

In common law jurisdictions, probate is the judicial process whereby a will is "proved" in a court of law and accepted as a valid public document that is the true last testament of the deceased; or whereby, in the absence of a legal will, the estate is settled according to the laws of intestacy that apply in the state where the deceased resided at the time of their death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Will contest</span>

A will contest, in the law of property, is a formal objection raised against the validity of a will, based on the contention that the will does not reflect the actual intent of the testator or that the will is otherwise invalid. Will contests generally focus on the assertion that the testator lacked testamentary capacity, was operating under an insane delusion, or was subject to undue influence or fraud. A will may be challenged in its entirety or in part.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slayer rule</span> Murderer cannot inherit from their victim

The slayer rule, in the U.S. law of inheritance, stops a person inheriting property from a person they murdered.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disclaimer of interest</span> Legal concept

In the law of inheritance, wills and trusts, a disclaimer of interest is an attempt by a person to renounce their legal right to benefit from an inheritance or through a trust. "If a trustee disclaims an interest in property that otherwise would have become trust property, the interest does not become trust property."

A statute of repose, like a statute of limitations, is a statute that cuts off certain legal rights if they are not acted on by a specified deadline.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Administration (probate law)</span> Administration of an estate on death

In common-law jurisdictions, administration of an estate on death arises if the deceased is legally intestate, meaning they did not leave a will, or some assets are not disposed of by their will.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freehold (law)</span> Legal term

A freehold, in common law jurisdictions such as England and Wales, Australia, Canada, Ireland, and twenty states in the United States, is the common mode of ownership of real property, or land, and all immovable structures attached to such land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom insolvency law</span> Law in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

United Kingdom insolvency law regulates companies in the United Kingdom which are unable to repay their debts. While UK bankruptcy law concerns the rules for natural persons, the term insolvency is generally used for companies formed under the Companies Act 2006. Insolvency means being unable to pay debts. Since the Cork Report of 1982, the modern policy of UK insolvency law has been to attempt to rescue a company that is in difficulty, to minimise losses and fairly distribute the burdens between the community, employees, creditors and other stakeholders that result from enterprise failure. If a company cannot be saved it is liquidated, meaning that the assets are sold off to repay creditors according to their priority. The main sources of law include the Insolvency Act 1986, the Insolvency Rules 1986, the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, the Employment Rights Act 1996 Part XII, the EU Insolvency Regulation, and case law. Numerous other Acts, statutory instruments and cases relating to labour, banking, property and conflicts of laws also shape the subject.

A probate court is a court that has competence in a jurisdiction to deal with matters of probate and the administration of estates. In some jurisdictions, such courts may be referred to as orphans' courts or courts of ordinary. In some jurisdictions probate court functions are performed by a chancery court or another court of equity, or as a part or division of another court.

The insolvency law of Switzerland is the law governing insolvency, foreclosure, bankruptcy and debt restructuring proceedings in Switzerland. It is principally codified in the Federal Statute on Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy of 11 April 1889 as well as in ancillary federal and cantonal laws.

The South African law of succession prescribes the rules which determine the devolution of a person's estate after his death, and all matters incidental thereto. It identifies the beneficiaries who are entitled to succeed to the deceased's estate, and the extent of the benefits they are to receive, and determines the different rights and duties that persons may have in a deceased's estate. It forms part of private law.

Administration in United Kingdom law is the main kind of procedure in UK insolvency law when a company is unable to pay its debts. The management of the company is usually replaced by an insolvency practitioner whose statutory duty is to rescue the company, save the business, or get the best result possible. While creditors with a security interest over all a company's assets could control the procedure previously through receivership, the Enterprise Act 2002 made administration the main procedure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Virgin Islands bankruptcy law</span>

British Virgin Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in the Insolvency Act, 2003, and to a lesser degree in the Insolvency Rules, 2005. Most of the emphasis of bankruptcy law in the British Virgin Islands relates to corporate insolvency rather than personal bankruptcy. As an offshore financial centre, the British Virgin Islands has many times more resident companies than citizens, and accordingly the courts spend more time dealing with corporate insolvency and reorganisation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayman Islands bankruptcy law</span>

Cayman Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in five statutes and statutory instruments:

Australian insolvency law regulates the position of companies which are in financial distress and are unable to pay or provide for all of their debts or other obligations, and matters ancillary to and arising from financial distress. The law in this area is principally governed by the Corporations Act 2001. Under Australian law, the term insolvency is usually used with reference to companies, and bankruptcy is used in relation to individuals. Insolvency law in Australia tries to seek an equitable balance between the competing interests of debtors, creditors and the wider community when debtors are unable to meet their financial obligations. The aim of the legislative provisions is to provide:

References

  1. ↑ Sheppard, Stephen Michael (2012). "Bouvier Law Dictionary Administrator of Estate". The Wolters Kluwer Bouvier Law Dictionary Desk Edition.
  2. ↑ "Responsibilities of an Estate Administrator | Internal Revenue Service". www.irs.gov. Retrieved 2023-02-20.
  3. ↑ Coltoff, Paul (2023). "Executors and Administrators". American Jurisprudence. 31 (48) – via LexisNexis.
  4. 1 2 3 Zupanec, Donald (2022). "Propriety of Court's Appointment, as Administrator of Decedent's Estate, of Stranger Rather than Person Having Statutory Preference". American Law Reports. 84 (707) – via LexisNexis.
  5. ↑ See Brooks v. De Lacy, 257 F.2d 227, 228 (D.C. Cir. 1958).  
  6. ↑ D.C. Code § 20-303 (1981).
  7. ↑ Chermside, Jr., Herbert (2021). "Physical condition as affecting competency to act as executor or administrator". American Law Reports. 71 (675): 690 – via LexisNexis.
  8. ↑ See Griffin v. Irwin, 246 Ala. 631, 635, 21 So. 2d 668, 672 (Ala. 1945).
  9. 1 2 Wakefield, Wanda (2022). "Adverse interest or position as disqualification for appointment of administrator, executor, or other personal representative". American Law Reports 4th. 11 (638) – via LexisNexis.
  10. ↑ In re Estate of Bowman, 143 N.E.2d 150, 153 (Oh. Ct. App. 1957); In re Estate of Gadiparthi, 632 A.2d 942, 947 (Pa. Commw. 1993); In re Estate of Schenna, 159 N.Y.S.2d 867, 870 (1957).
  11. 1 2 Barnett, A.G. (2021). "Power and authority, in the absence of determining clause in will, of executor or administrator to lease out, or to rent, decedent's real estate". American Law Reports. 95 (258) – via LexisNexis.
  12. ↑ "Responsibilities of an Estate Administrator | Internal Revenue Service". www.irs.gov. Retrieved 2023-02-20.
  13. ↑ "Administration of an Estate". County of Union. 2014-03-24. Retrieved 2023-02-27.
  14. ↑ N.J.S.A. 3b:5-3 (2009).
  15. ↑ "How to Finalize and Wind Up a Probate Estate | NJ Estate Administration". Hanlon Niemann & Wright Law Firm | New Jersey Attorneys. Retrieved 2023-02-27.
  16. ↑ Succession of Thibaut, 7822, (La. 7/2/69), 224 So. 2d 852, 856-858.
  17. ↑ Zupanec, Donald (2022). "Propriety of Court's Appointment, as Administrator of Decedent's Estate, of Stranger Rather than Person Having Statutory Preference". American Law Reports. 84 (707) – via LexisNexis.
  18. ↑ Burke v. Burke, 993, S.W.2d 576, 581 (Mo. App. 1999).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.