Alien land laws were a series of legislative attempts to discourage Asian and other "non-desirable" immigrants from settling permanently in U.S. states and territories by limiting their ability to own land and property. Because the Naturalization Act of 1870 had extended citizenship rights only to African Americans but not other ethnic groups, these laws relied on coded language excluding "aliens ineligible for citizenship" to prohibit primarily Chinese and Japanese immigrants from becoming landowners without explicitly naming any racial group. [1] Various alien land laws existed in over a dozen states. Like other discriminatory measures aimed at preventing minorities from establishing homes and businesses in certain areas, such as redlining and restrictive covenants, many alien land laws remained technically in effect, forgotten or ignored, for many years after enforcement of the laws fell out of practice. [2]
Since the 2020s, some states have passed laws with similar restrictions on agricultural land ownership by citizens or entities from "foreign adversaries," such as the People's Republic of China, citing national security concerns. [3] [4] As of October 2025, approximately 29 states have enacted such legislation. [5] [6]
Resentment against Asian immigrants in the U.S. grew with their population. Although American businesses had initially recruited Chinese immigrants as a cheap labor source in the emerging railroad and mining industries (and, in the Reconstruction South, to replace slaves on sugar plantations) by the late 19th century, fears of a largescale "Mongolian" plot to take land and resources from white Americans became widespread. [7] Contemporary newspapers and politicians cultivated the idea of a Yellow Peril: an imminent threat to white morality and economic interests posed by Chinese and other Asian immigrants. Nativist groups prevented the Naturalization Act of 1870 from granting citizenship rights (and therefore the ability to vote and serve on juries) to Asians, and successfully campaigned for laws to reduce and finally, with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, stop immigration from China.
The end of Chinese immigration came around the same time as the opening of Japan, when Japanese citizens were for the first time in the nation's history allowed to emigrate to other countries, and Japanese soon replaced Chinese as the primary target for labor recruiters. New Japanese immigrants, including many recently released from indentured labor contracts with Hawaiian plantations, moved to rural areas in Western states and took up tenant farming, taking over land formerly occupied by Chinese farmers. The sharp increase in the population of Japanese residing in the U.S. and their success in the agricultural industry soon resulted in an exclusionary movement similar to that faced by the earlier wave of primarily Chinese workers. [7] Following the pattern set by the anti-Chinese movement, anti-Japanese lobbyists first limited Japanese immigration to the U.S. with the Gentlemen's Agreement of 1907 and then stopped East Asian immigration completely with the Immigration Act of 1924. The Cable Act of 1922 added further complications to the ban on citizenship for Asian immigrants, stripping U.S.-born women of their citizenship if they married men ineligible for naturalization. Meanwhile, alien land laws became a common tool to prevent Asian immigrants already in the country from becoming a permanent presence in hostile white communities.
In 2023, Florida enacted legislation, Senate Bill 264 (Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 692.201-205), restricting property ownership for citizens of China, along with nationals from Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and Syria. [22] [23] The law targets individuals without relevant US legal status and extends to government officials, political party members, and businesses from these countries, especially those seeking to own agricultural land or property near military installations, citing national security risks. [23] This move has sparked significant legal debate, with experts suggesting that the law could face challenges similar to those that historically overturned similar statutes on constitutional grounds. [24]
In May 2023, Chinese nationals living in Florida filed a lawsuit (Shen v. Simpson), alleging that SB 264 violated their rights to equal protection, due process, and the Fair Housing Act. [25] [26] On November 4, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that plaintiffs lacked standing (as the law applies only to people "domiciled" in China) and that the law does not violate federal statutes or discriminate against Asians. [27]
In June 2025, Texas Governor Abbott signed into law Senate Bill 17 (SB 17), which prohibits agricultural land ownership by entities or individuals "domiciled" in China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, countries designated as national security risks. [28]
In July 2025, Chinese nationals who live in Texas sued Texas Attorney General Paxton (Wang v. Paxton), alleging that the law violates the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause and is preempted by the Fair Housing Act. [29] The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissed the case on August 18, 2025 for lack of standing. Plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [30]
in 1947, Japanese again could buy their own land in Utah due to the repeal of the Alien Land Law.