Alien land laws

Last updated August 15, 2024

Alien land laws were a series of legislative attempts to discourage Asian and other "non-desirable" immigrants from settling permanently in U.S. states and territories by limiting their ability to own land and property. Because the Naturalization Act of 1870 had extended citizenship rights only to African Americans but not other ethnic groups, these laws relied on coded language excluding "aliens ineligible for citizenship" to prohibit primarily Chinese and Japanese immigrants from becoming landowners without explicitly naming any racial group.^[1] Various alien land laws existed in over a dozen states. Like other discriminatory measures aimed at preventing minorities from establishing homes and businesses in certain areas, such as redlining and restrictive covenants, many alien land laws remained technically in effect, forgotten or ignored, for many years after enforcement of the laws fell out of practice.^[2]

Background

Resentment against Asian immigrants in the U.S. grew with their population. Although American businesses had initially recruited Chinese immigrants as a cheap labor source in the emerging railroad and mining industries (and, in the Reconstruction South, to replace slaves on sugar plantations) by the late 19th century, fears of a largescale "Mongolian" plot to take land and resources from white Americans became widespread.^[3] Contemporary newspapers and politicians cultivated the idea of a Yellow Peril: an imminent threat to white morality and economic interests posed by Chinese and other Asian immigrants. Nativist groups prevented the Naturalization Act of 1870 from granting citizenship rights (and therefore the ability to vote and serve on juries) to Asians, and successfully campaigned for laws to reduce and finally, with the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, stop immigration from China.

The end of Chinese immigration came around the same time as the opening of Japan, when Japanese citizens were for the first time in the nation's history allowed to emigrate to other countries, and Japanese soon replaced Chinese as the primary target for labor recruiters. New Japanese immigrants, including many recently released from indentured labor contracts with Hawaiian plantations, moved to rural areas in Western states and took up tenant farming, taking over land formerly occupied by Chinese farmers. The sharp increase in the population of Japanese residing in the U.S. and their success in the agricultural industry soon resulted in an exclusionary movement similar to that faced by the earlier wave of primarily Chinese workers.^[3] Following the pattern set by the anti-Chinese movement, anti-Japanese lobbyists first limited Japanese immigration to the U.S. with the Gentlemen's Agreement of 1907 and then stopped East Asian immigration completely with the Immigration Act of 1924. The Cable Act of 1922 added further complications to the ban on citizenship for Asian immigrants, stripping U.S.-born women of their citizenship if they married men ineligible for naturalization. Meanwhile, alien land laws became a common tool to prevent Asian immigrants already in the country from becoming a permanent presence in hostile white communities.

List of laws

Arkansas

1943 - Arkansas, home to two World War II Japanese American incarceration sites, passed a law specifically barring any "Japanese or a descendant of a Japanese" from purchasing land in that state, though by including citizen Nisei within its scope, it was not a true alien land law.^[4]

California

1879 - The state revises its constitution to limit the ownership of land to aliens who are of "the white race or of African descent."^[1]
1913 - California's Alien Land Law prohibits aliens ineligible for citizenship from owning property or entering into leases longer than three years.
1920 - Further restrictions are added to the 1913 law, making any lease agreement with an ineligible alien illegal and barring companies owned by ineligible aliens from purchasing land.

Florida

2008 voters rejected amendment to remove alien land law
November 2018 voted on again^[5] and the repeal was approved by the voters.^[6]

Minnesota

1887 - The state legislature limits ownership of real estate to citizens and "those who have lawfully declared their intentions to become such," and prevents companies with more than 20 percent alien ownership from purchasing land.^[7]
1897-1911 - A series of exceptions to the 1887 law are enacted, allowing alien-owned corporations to hold land so long as it is being sold to "actual settlers" or being used for legitimate business purposes.^[7]

Nebraska

1841 - The Preemption Act allows settlers to file a "preemptive" claim on up to 160 acres of land, protecting their title against subsequent claims on the tract. Claimants must provide proof of citizenship or a declaration to obtain citizenship in order to file for preemption.^[8]
1862 - The Homestead Act, which allows settlers to claim up to 160 acres of land on which they live and work, includes a requirement that homesteaders be citizens or have filed for citizenship.^[8]
1904 - The Kincaid Act, another homestead law allowing settlers to claim up to 640 acres of land in the western and central parts of the state less conducive to small-plot farming and ranching, uses the same citizenship requirement as the previous laws.^[8]

Oregon

1859 - Oregon rewrites its constitution to state that no "Chinaman" can own property in the state.^[1]
1923 - After three failed attempts to pass laws limiting land and property rights to citizens and those eligible for naturalization, an act based on the California model is pushed through the state legislature.^[9]
1945 - Oregon enacted a law forbidding Issei from not only working on farms owned by their children, but forbade them from living with their children or even stepping onto their children's farm fields. Later, in 1947, it was unanimously declared unconstitutional by Oregon's Supreme Court.^[10]

Texas

1891 - Texas passes a law prohibiting aliens or alien-owned companies from holding property for more than six years (aliens eligible for naturalization are exempt if they obtain citizenship before the end of the six year grace period). The law is repealed as unconstitutional later that same year.^[11]
1892 - A new law extends the previous time limit from six to ten years and removes the restriction against corporations owned by aliens.^[11]
1921 - The state essentially returns to the restrictions of the 1891 law, once again prohibiting alien-owned companies from obtaining property and reducing the time limit on holding land from ten to five years.^[11]

Utah

1943 - After the Topaz War Relocation Center was established in Utah, the legislature passed a land law prohibiting land purchase by aliens, allowing only a yearly lease.^[4] This law was repealed in 1947.^[12]

Washington

1886 - Passed the same year as a race riot in which Seattle's Chinese population was displaced by a mob of angry whites, Washington Territory writes a constitutional provision barring aliens ineligible for citizenship from owning property.^[13]
1889 - A statute requiring aliens to declare an intent to naturalize "in good faith" in order to buy property is added to the territory's constitution, refining the 1886 law.^[1]^[13]
1921 - An alien land bill modeled after the California law is passed in the state legislature after failing to make it onto the 1920 ballot. As in California, ineligible aliens were prohibited from leasing land.^[13]
1923 - The 1921 law is expanded to prevent the U.S.-born children of immigrants from holding land in trust for their parents.^[1]
1967 - The Washington state legislature repeals the 1921 alien land law.^[14]

Wyoming

1943 - Wyoming, which was home to the Heart Mountain Relocation Center, an incarceration camp for Japanese Americans removed from the West Coast during World War II, passed alien land laws in order to prevent former camp inmates from resettling in Wyoming. This land law was repealed in 2001.^[2]^[15]

Other states

1921 - Arizona^[9] and Louisiana^[4] pass alien land acts. New Mexico voters approve an amendment to the state constitution that prohibits ineligible aliens from owning property in the state (the amendment is removed in 2006).^[16]
1923 - Idaho and Montana pass alien land laws.^[4]
1925 - Kansas and Arkansas write their own laws restricting property rights.^[4]

Related court cases

Yamashita v. Washington (1902) — Takuji Yamashita filed a brief with the Washington State Supreme Court after being denied the ability to practice law on the grounds that he was ineligible for naturalization and therefore ineligible to become an attorney under the Washington Bar's requirements. The court ruled unanimously against him.
California v. Harada (1918) — The state supreme court ruled in favor of Jukichi Harada, who with his wife had purchased a home in the name of their three American-born children, finding that the children's citizenship gave them the right to own real property despite their status as minors.
Ozawa v. United States (1922) — Takao Ozawa petitioned for citizenship, arguing that people of Japanese descent were included in the "white race" and therefore eligible for naturalization. The Supreme Court ruled against Ozawa.
Yamashita v. Hinkle (1922) — Decided the same day as the Ozawa case, the Supreme Court upheld a Washington state alien land law challenged by Takuji Yamashita.
Estate of Tetsubumi Yano (1922) — The California Supreme Court found that a non-citizen parent had guardianship rights over agricultural land owned in the name of his Nisei daughter.^[1]
Webb v. O'Brien (1923) — Overturning a lower court decision, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on cropping contracts, which technically dealt with labor rather than land and were used by many Issei to avoid the restrictions of California's alien land act.^[9]
Porterfield v. Webb and Terrace v. Thompson (1923) — Two Supreme Court cases in which bans on leasing to ineligible aliens in Washington and California were ruled constitutional.^[9]
Washington v. Hirabayashi (1925) — Washington's Supreme Court decided that the land purchased in the name of a Nisei but managed primarily by an Issei-owned company must revert to the state.^[1]
Oyama v. California (1948) — The Supreme Court ruled that Fred Oyama's 14th Amendment rights had been violated when the state of California moved to repossess land purchased by Oyama's non-citizen father in his son's name while the family was in camp. However, the 1913 and 1920 alien land laws used by the state to justify the escheat filing, while weakened, were not struck down at this time.
Takahashi v. California Fish and Game Commission (1948) — Torao Takahashi, an Issei fisherman who was denied a fishing license upon his return to Terminal Island after being released from camp in 1945, successfully challenged a state law that declared aliens ineligible for citizenship could not obtain a commercial fishing license.
Fujii v. California (1952) — The California Supreme Court ruled that California's 1920 Alien Land Law, and others like it, violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Although enforcement of the California law had essentially stopped after the Oyama decision in 1948, the ruling in that case had not addressed the constitutionality of the law but only the individual rights of Fred Oyama. The Fujii ruling dealt directly with the legislation itself, therefore nullifying alien land laws.
Masaoka v. California (1952) — Issued three months after the Fujii decision officially branded such laws unconstitutional, the California Supreme Court upheld a lower court's ruling against California's Alien Land Law.^[17]

2021 Florida Legislation

In 2021, Florida enacted legislation restricting property ownership for citizens of China, along with nationals from Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, and Syria. The law targets individuals without relevant US legal status and extends to government officials, political party members, and businesses from these countries, especially those seeking to own agricultural land or property near military installations. This move has sparked significant legal debate, with experts suggesting that the law could face challenges similar to those that historically overturned similar statutes on constitutional grounds.^[18]

Related Research Articles

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth. This decision established an important precedent in its interpretation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

The Japanese American Citizens League is an Asian American civil rights charity, headquartered in San Francisco, with regional chapters across the United States.

The Cable Act of 1922 was a United States federal law that partially reversed the Expatriation Act of 1907. (It is also known as the Married Women's Citizenship Act or the Women's Citizenship Act). In theory the law was designed to grant women their own national identity; however, in practice, as it still retained vestiges of coverture, tying a woman's legal identity to her husband's, it had to be amended multiple times before it granted women citizenship in their own right.

Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922), was a US legal proceeding. The United States Supreme Court found Takao Ozawa, a Japanese American who was born in Japan but had lived in the United States for 20 years, ineligible for naturalization. In 1914, Ozawa filed for United States citizenship under the Naturalization Act of 1906. This act allowed only "free white persons" and "persons of African nativity or persons of African descent" to naturalize. Ozawa did not challenge the constitutionality of the racial restrictions. Instead, he claimed that Japanese people should be properly classified as "free white persons".

Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 (1948) was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled that specific provisions of the 1913 and 1920 California Alien Land Laws abridged the rights and privileges guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to Fred Oyama, a U.S. citizen in whose name his father, a Japanese citizen, had purchased land. In doing so, however, the court did not overturn the California Alien Land Laws as unconstitutional.

Ulysses Sigel Webb was an American lawyer and politician affiliated with the Republican Party. He served as the 19th Attorney General of California for the lengthy span of 37 years. He was previously the District Attorney of Plumas County from 1890 to 1902. He was the longest serving attorney general in California history.

The California Alien Land Law of 1913 prohibited "aliens ineligible for citizenship" from owning agricultural land or possessing long-term leases over it, but permitted leases lasting up to three years. It affected the Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and Korean immigrant farmers in California. Implicitly, the law was primarily directed at the Japanese. It passed 35–2 in the State Senate and 72–3 in the State Assembly and was co-written by attorney Francis J. Heney and California state attorney general Ulysses S. Webb at the behest of Governor Hiram Johnson. Japan's Consul General Kametaro Iijima and lawyer Juichi Soyeda lobbied against the law. In a letter to the United States Secretary of State, the Japanese government via the Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs called the law "essentially unfair and inconsistent... with the sentiments of amity and good neighborhood which have presided over the relations between the two countries," and noted that Japan felt it was "in disregard of the spirit of the existing treaty between Japan and the United States." The law was meant to discourage immigration from Asia, and to create an inhospitable climate for immigrants already living in California.

Asian immigration to the United States refers to immigration to the United States from part of the continent of Asia, which includes East Asia, South Asia, and Southeast Asia. Asian-origin populations have historically been in the territory that would eventually become the United States since the 16th century. The first major wave of Asian immigration occurred in the late 19th century, primarily in Hawaii and the West Coast. Asian Americans experienced exclusion, and limitations to immigration, by the United States law between 1875 and 1965, and were largely prohibited from naturalization until the 1940s. Since the elimination of Asian exclusion laws and the reform of the immigration system in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, there has been a large increase in the number of immigrants to the United States from Asia.

The Naturalization Act of 1790 was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person(s) ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, enslaved people, free Africans, Pacific Islanders, and non-White Asians. This eliminated ambiguity on how to treat newcomers, given that free black people had been allowed citizenship at the state level in many states. In reading the Naturalization Act, the courts also associated whiteness with Christianity and thus excluded Muslim immigrants from citizenship until the decision Ex Parte Mohriez recognized citizenship for a Saudi Muslim man in 1944.

United States citizenship can be acquired by birthright in two situations: by virtue of the person's birth within United States territory or because at least one of their parents was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person's birth. Birthright citizenship contrasts with citizenship acquired in other ways, for example by naturalization.

The Citizenship Clause is the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was adopted on July 9, 1868, which states:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial aspects of race in the United States</span>

Legislation seeking to direct relations between racial or ethnic groups in the United States has had several historical phases, developing from the European colonization of the Americas, the triangular slave trade, and the American Indian Wars. The 1776 Declaration of Independence included the statement that "all men are created equal", which has ultimately inspired actions and legislation against slavery and racial discrimination. Such actions have led to passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

People from Japan began emigrating to the U.S. in significant numbers following the political, cultural, and social changes stemming from the 1868 Meiji Restoration. Japanese immigration to the Americas started with immigration to Hawaii in the first year of the Meiji era in 1868.

During the 18th and most of the 19th centuries, the United States had limited regulation of immigration and naturalization at a national level. Under a mostly prevailing "open border" policy, immigration was generally welcomed, although citizenship was limited to “white persons” as of 1790, and naturalization subject to five year residency requirement as of 1802. Passports and visas were not required for entry into America, rules and procedures for arriving immigrants were determined by local ports of entry or state laws. Processes for naturalization were determined by local county courts.

Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm'n, 334 U.S. 410 (1948), was a test case brought by Japanese-American fishermen before the United States Supreme Court to challenge California state legislation aimed at preventing them from returning to fishing occupations they worked in before their mass removal and internment during World War II. The issue at hand was a restrictive law in California requiring American citizenship to get a fishing license. A 1945 amendment to the state code barred "aliens ineligible to citizenship" from obtaining fishing licenses. The Court held that this was an unreasonable restriction and was discriminatory to residents of Japanese ancestry.

The Expatriation Act of 1907 was an act of the 59th United States Congress concerning retention and relinquishment of United States nationality by married women and Americans residing abroad. It effectively functioned as Congressional endorsement of the various ad hoc rulings on loss of United States nationality that had been made by the State Department since the enactment of the Expatriation Act of 1868. Some sections of it were repealed by other acts in the early 1920s; those sections which remained were codified at 8 U.S.C. §§ 6–17, but those too were repealed by the Nationality Act of 1940 when the question of dual citizenship arose.

This is a timeline of voting rights in the United States, documenting when various groups in the country gained the right to vote or were disenfranchised.

Terrace v. Thompson, 263 U.S. 197 (1923), decided by U.S. Supreme Court on November 12, 1923, was a case challenging Washington Alien Land Law that is preventing aliens purchasing, using, or leasing the land. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the decision of state that Due Process and Equal Protection clause of Fourteenth Amendment and the treaty between the United States and Japan are not conflicted.

References

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lyon, Cherstin M. "Alien land laws" Densho Encyclopedia. Retrieved 08 July 2014.
1 2 Prengaman, Peter. "Racist Statutes Under Siege" Los Angeles Times (29 September 2002). Retrieved 09 July 2014.
1 2 Matsumoto, Mieko. "Chinese Exclusion Act" Densho Encyclopedia. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
1 2 3 4 5 McGovney, Dudley O. (1947). "The Anti-Japanese Land Laws of California and Ten Other States" (PDF). California Law Review. 35 (1): 7–60. doi:10.2307/3477374. JSTOR 3477374 . Retrieved 10 July 2014.
↑ "Repeal of 'alien land' law goes on ballot". 17 April 2018.
↑ "Florida Amendment 11, Repeal Prohibition on Aliens' Property Ownership, Delete Obsolete Provision on High-Speed Rail, and Repeal of Criminal Statutes' Effect on Prosecution Amendment (2018)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
1 2 Rankin, Sam. "Alien Farmers in Minnesota, 1851-2004," Minnesota House Research Department (2004). Retrieved 16 July 2014.
1 2 3 "U.S. Government Land Laws in Nebraska, 1854-1904," ^[usurped] Nebraska State Historical Society (29 June 1998). Retrieved 18 July 2014.
1 2 3 4 Niiya, Brian (1993). Japanese American History: An A-to-Z Reference from 1868 to the Present. pp. 44–47. ISBN 0-8160-2680-7.
↑ Ito, Kazuo (1973). Issei: A History of Japanese Immigrants in North America. Seattle: Executive Committee for Publication. pp. 160–161. ASIN B000IXEZ4G.
1 2 3 "Alien Land Law," Handbook of Texas Online (Texas State Historical Association). Retrieved 16 July 2014.
↑ Taniguchi, Nancy (1994). "Japanese Immigrants in Utah". Utah History Encyclopedia. Utah Education Network. Retrieved 12 August 2022. in 1947, Japanese again could buy their own land in Utah due to the repeal of the Alien Land Law.
1 2 3 Grant, Nicole (2008). "White Supremacy and the Alien Land Laws of Washington State". Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project.
↑ Caldbick, John (2018-02-09). "Washington Governor Louis Hart signs stringent Alien Land Bill on March 8, 1921". Historylink.org .
↑ Matsumoto, Mieko. "Heart Mountain" Densho Encyclopedia. Retrieved 09 July 2014.
↑ Bronstein, Jamie (2013). "Sowing Discontent: The 1921 Alien Land Act in New Mexico". Pacific Historical Review. 82 (3): 362–395. doi:10.1525/phr.2013.82.3.362.
↑ Niiya. Japanese American History, p69.
↑ Florida Law Blocks Chinese Citizens From Homeownership 2024.

External links

Lyon, Cherstin M. "Alien land laws" Densho Encyclopedia.
Robinson, Greg. "Fujii v. California" Densho Encyclopedia.
How residents of Locke, California, the last rural Chinese town in America, lived under the Alien Land laws: "Bitter Melon: Inside America's Last Rural Chinese Town"

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Lyon-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lyon, Cherstin M. "Alien land laws" Densho Encyclopedia. Retrieved 08 July 2014.

[Prengaman-2] 1 2 Prengaman, Peter. "Racist Statutes Under Siege" Los Angeles Times (29 September 2002). Retrieved 09 July 2014.

[ExclusionAct-3] 1 2 Matsumoto, Mieko. "Chinese Exclusion Act" Densho Encyclopedia. Retrieved 10 July 2014.

[McGovney-4] 1 2 3 4 5 McGovney, Dudley O. (1947). "The Anti-Japanese Land Laws of California and Ten Other States" (PDF). California Law Review. 35 (1): 7–60. doi:10.2307/3477374. JSTOR 3477374 . Retrieved 10 July 2014.

[5] "Repeal of 'alien land' law goes on ballot". 17 April 2018.

[6] "Florida Amendment 11, Repeal Prohibition on Aliens' Property Ownership, Delete Obsolete Provision on High-Speed Rail, and Repeal of Criminal Statutes' Effect on Prosecution Amendment (2018)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2021-01-17.

[MN-7] 1 2 Rankin, Sam. "Alien Farmers in Minnesota, 1851-2004," Minnesota House Research Department (2004). Retrieved 16 July 2014.

[Nebraska-8] 1 2 3 "U.S. Government Land Laws in Nebraska, 1854-1904," ^[usurped] Nebraska State Historical Society (29 June 1998). Retrieved 18 July 2014.

[Niiya-9] 1 2 3 4 Niiya, Brian (1993). Japanese American History: An A-to-Z Reference from 1868 to the Present. pp. 44–47. ISBN 0-8160-2680-7.

[ito160-10] Ito, Kazuo (1973). Issei: A History of Japanese Immigrants in North America. Seattle: Executive Committee for Publication. pp. 160–161. ASIN B000IXEZ4G.

[TSHA-11] 1 2 3 "Alien Land Law," Handbook of Texas Online (Texas State Historical Association). Retrieved 16 July 2014.

[Taniguchi-12] Taniguchi, Nancy (1994). "Japanese Immigrants in Utah". Utah History Encyclopedia. Utah Education Network. Retrieved 12 August 2022. in 1947, Japanese again could buy their own land in Utah due to the repeal of the Alien Land Law.

[Grant-13] 1 2 3 Grant, Nicole (2008). "White Supremacy and the Alien Land Laws of Washington State". Seattle Civil Rights & Labor History Project.

[historylink2124-14] Caldbick, John (2018-02-09). "Washington Governor Louis Hart signs stringent Alien Land Bill on March 8, 1921". Historylink.org .

[15] Matsumoto, Mieko. "Heart Mountain" Densho Encyclopedia. Retrieved 09 July 2014.

[16] Bronstein, Jamie (2013). "Sowing Discontent: The 1921 Alien Land Act in New Mexico". Pacific Historical Review. 82 (3): 362–395. doi:10.1525/phr.2013.82.3.362.

[17] Niiya. Japanese American History, p69.

[18] Florida Law Blocks Chinese Citizens From Homeownership 2024.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]