American Bar Association v. United States Department of Education

Last updated

American Bar Association v. United States Department of Education
Seal of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.png
Court United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Full case nameAmerican Bar Association, et al. v. United States Department of Education, et al.
ArguedSeptember 26 2018
DecidedFebruary 22 2019
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Timothy J. Kelly

American Bar Association v. United States Department of Education, 370 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2019), was a case filed in December 2016 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that reached its final resolution in February 2020, in which the ABA and four individual public interest lawyers (two of whom were former ABA employees) succeeded in preventing the United States Department of Education from denying individuals employed by certain "public service organizations" eligibility to participate in the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program. [1] Following an initial victory on summary judgment for three of the individual plaintiffs in the district court's February 2019 ruling, the ABA and the fourth individual plaintiff settled the outstanding issues with the department. As a result, the four individual plaintiffs and all employees of the ABA, as well as other similarly situated individuals, are eligible to participate in the PSLF program.

Contents

History

The PSLF program was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2007 and provided that anyone working full-time in eligible public service jobs could have the remaining balance of their student loans issued under the Federal Direct Student Loan Program forgiven after making 120 qualifying monthly payments. In 2008, the Department of Education issued a regulation defining the term "public service job" to include any full-time position at an eligible "public service organization," including a federal, state, local, or Tribal government; a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization; and any other not-for-profit organization that provides any of a number of listed "public services," including "public interest law services" and "public education," among others. The ABA is a not-for-profit 501(c)(6) organization. Several ABA employees, including two who were individual plaintiffs in the case, worked on public interest law projects for the organization, such as assisting undocumented immigrants on the U.S. southern border and expanding access to justice for indigent individuals. After initially reviewing the Employment Certification Forms submitted by those employees, the Department of Education sent letters confirming that their ABA employment would qualify them for the PSLF program, provided that they continued to make monthly payments for the required 120-month period. Similarly, the remaining two individual plaintiffs, who worked for the not-for-profit 501(c)(6) American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and not-for-profit 501(c)(19) Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA), provided public education services on issues related to immigration law and services to individuals with disabilities and the elderly (i.e., Vietnam War veterans), respectively; the department likewise informed them that their employment qualified them for participation in PSLF. A few years later, however, the department issued each of these individuals notices stating that their employment did not qualify for PSLF, that the prior approval notices had been issued in error, and that none of the payments made on their loans while employed by these organizations would count toward the 120-payment threshold.

Following unsuccessful attempts by the ABA to resolve its dispute with the department, the ABA and the four individual plaintiffs filed suit on December 20, 2016, seeking to force the department to reinstate the plaintiffs' PSLF eligibility. [2] The plaintiffs alleged that the department had improperly changed its interpretations of the PSLF qualifying criteria as defined in the statute and regulation, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the plaintiffs' due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. The department's primary arguments in defense were that the lawsuit was premature since none of the individuals in question had yet reached the 120-payment threshold that would allow them to apply for PSLF, and therefore that there had been no "final agency action" giving rise to an APA claim; and that the department had not changed its interpretations but instead had merely corrected errors committed by its student loan servicer, which was responsible for administering the PSLF program. The department also defended its denials by arguing that the ABA and the other organizations were not public service organizations because their "primary purpose" was not to provide one of the services listed in the regulation, and because AILA's public education services were not provided in a "school or school-like setting." [3]

Decision and outcome

In an opinion issued on February 22, 2019, Judge Timothy J. Kelly granted summary judgment in favor of three of the individual plaintiffs: the two former ABA employees and the AILA employee. [4] Kelly rejected as "nonsense" the department's argument that its denials did not amount to final agency action, finding that the legal and practical effects of the department's denial notices were significant given the immense impact on the plaintiffs' ability to plan their careers and finances, even if they had not yet applied for final loan forgiveness. Kelly further determined that evidence produced by the plaintiffs demonstrated conclusively that the department had created the "primary purpose" and "school-like setting" standards years after issuing its 2008 regulation and without providing any of the public notice required under the APA, thus rendering the changes arbitrary and capricious. As a result, he issued an order vacating those standards and remanding the denial notices to the department for reconsideration in light of his opinion. Kelly denied summary judgment to the ABA as an organization and to the fourth individual plaintiff who had worked for VVA, finding that the evidence did not demonstrate that that plaintiff's denial had been based on a changed interpretation.

The ABA and the fourth individual plaintiff commenced an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. For its part, the department declined to appeal the district court's ruling with respect to the three individual plaintiffs who had prevailed. Following a court-appointed mediation, the department agreed to issue letters confirming that both the ABA and VVA are qualifying public service organizations for purposes of the PSLF program, and restored the fourth individual plaintiff's payment credits earned while at VVA. Ropes & Gray LLP partner Chong Park, who represented the plaintiffs, noted the "positive impact this has for [the] individual plaintiffs as well as other student loan borrowers in similar positions." The practical effect of the outcome is that the department is barred from applying the "primary purpose" or "school-like setting" standards when assessing the PSLF eligibility of any non-501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student loan</span> Type of loan for educational expenses

A student loan is a type of loan designed to help students pay for post-secondary education and the associated fees, such as tuition, books and supplies, and living expenses. It may differ from other types of loans in the fact that the interest rate may be substantially lower and the repayment schedule may be deferred while the student is still in school. It also differs in many countries in the strict laws regulating renegotiating and bankruptcy. This article highlights the differences of the student loan system in several major countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ITT Technical Institute</span> Former for-profit technical institute

ITT Technical Institute was a private for-profit technical institute with its headquarters in Carmel, Indiana and many campuses throughout the United States. Founded in 1969 and growing to 130 campuses in 38 states of the United States, ITT Tech was one of the largest for-profit educators in the US before it closed in 2016.

A 501(c) organization is a nonprofit organization in the federal law of the United States according to Internal Revenue Code and is one of over 29 types of nonprofit organizations exempt from some federal income taxes. Sections 503 through 505 set out the requirements for obtaining such exemptions. Many states refer to Section 501(c) for definitions of organizations exempt from state taxation as well. 501(c) organizations can receive unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and unions.

The Presidential Management Fellows (PMF) Program is a two-year training and leadership development program at a United States government agency, administered by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), for advanced degree holders. After completing the program, agencies may convert PMFs to permanent federal civilian employees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Higher Education Act of 1965</span> U.S. law establishing a student loan program

The Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA) was legislation signed into United States law on November 8, 1965, as part of President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society domestic agenda. Johnson chose Texas State University, his alma mater, as the signing site. The law was intended "to strengthen the educational resources of our colleges and universities and to provide financial assistance for students in postsecondary and higher education". It increased federal money given to universities, created scholarships, gave low-interest loans for students, and established a National Teachers Corps. The "financial assistance for students" is covered in Title IV of the HEA.

The Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program was a system of private student loans which were subsidized and guaranteed by the United States federal government. The program issued loans from 1965 until it was ended in 2010. Similar loans are now provided under the Federal Direct Student Loan Program, which are federal loans issued directly by the United States Department of Education.

The William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program provides "low-interest loans for students and parents to help pay for the cost of a student's education after high school. The lender is the U.S. Department of Education ... rather than a bank or other financial institution." It is the largest single source of federal financial aid for students and their parents pursuing post-secondary education and for many it is the first financial obligation they incur, leaving them with debt to be paid over a period of time that can be a decade or more as the average student takes 19.4 years. The program is named after William D. Ford, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Michigan.

A 501(c)(3) organization is a United States corporation, trust, unincorporated association or other type of organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of Title 26 of the United States Code. It is one of the 29 types of 501(c) nonprofit organizations in the US.

In the United States, federal assistance, also known as federal aid, federal benefits, or federal funds, is defined as any federal program, project, service, or activity provided by the federal government that directly assists domestic governments, organizations, or individuals in the areas of education, health, public safety, public welfare, and public works, among others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student loans in the United States</span> Loans incurred to pay for higher education

In the United States, student loans are a form of financial aid intended to help students access higher education. In 2018, 70 percent of higher education graduates had used loans to cover some or all of their expenses. With notable exceptions, student loans must be repaid, in contrast to other forms of financial aid such as scholarships, which are not repaid, and grants, which rarely have to be repaid. Student loans may be discharged through bankruptcy, but this is difficult. Research shows that access to student loans increases credit-constrained students' degree completion, later-life earnings, and student loan repayment while having no impact on overall debt.

Income-based repayment or income-driven-repayment (IDR) is a student loan repayment program in the United States that regulates the amount that one needs to pay each month based on one's current income and family size.

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program is a United States government program that was created under the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 (CCRAA) to provide indebted professionals a way out of their federal student loan debt burden by working full-time in public service.

Pay As You Earn (PAYE) is a federal student loan relief program signed into law on December 21, 2012, by President Barack Obama.

The Teacher Loan Forgiveness program is a student loan forgiveness program by the United States Department of Education. This program is intended to encourage individuals to enter and continue in the teaching profession. Under this program, teachers who provide direct classroom teaching, or classroom-type teaching in a nonclassroom setting full-time for five complete and consecutive academic years in a Title 1 eligible school or school district may be eligible to receive loan forgiveness for their federal student loans.

Navient Corporation is an American student loan servicer based in Wilmington, Delaware. Managing nearly $300 billion in student loans for more than 12 million debtors, the company was formed in 2014 by the split of Sallie Mae into two distinct entities: Sallie Mae Bank and Navient. Navient employs 6,000 people at offices across the U.S. As of 2018, Navient services 25% of student loans in the United States.

Linda Klein is an American lawyer, past president of the American Bar Association, and senior managing shareholder at the Baker Donelson law firm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paycheck Protection Program</span> U.S. federal government business loan program

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) is a $953-billion business loan program established by the United States federal government during the Trump administration in 2020 through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act to help certain businesses, self-employed workers, sole proprietors, certain nonprofit organizations, and tribal businesses continue paying their workers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal aid during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada</span> National economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic

The Government of Canada introduced multiple temporary social security and financial aid programs in response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. The initial CA$82-billion aid package was announced on March 18, 2020 by Justin Trudeau.

The Student Borrower Protection Center is a nonprofit organization aimed at protecting borrowers of student loans and improving the student loan system.

Biden v. Nebraska, 600 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the forgiveness of federal student loans by the Biden administration in 2022, challenged by multiple states. The Supreme Court's ruling was issued on June 30, 2023, ruling 6–3 that the Secretary of Education did not have the power to waive student loans under the HEROES Act.

References

  1. ↑ "ABA, Education Department settle student loan forgiveness". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved June 3, 2020.
  2. ↑ Douglas-Gabriel, Danielle (December 20, 2016). "Lawsuit accuses Education Department of reversing course on student loan forgiveness". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 18, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  3. ↑ September 25, Karen Sloan |; PM, 2018 at 04:29. "ABA, Dept. of Education Battle Over Loan Forgiveness". Texas Lawyer. Retrieved February 18, 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  4. ↑ Lieber, Ron (February 23, 2019). "3 Borrowers Win Case on Eligibility for Public Service Loan Forgiveness". The New York Times. Retrieved June 3, 2020.
  5. ↑ "ABA, Education Department settle student loan forgiveness". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved June 3, 2020.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.