Arlene B. Mayerson is an American civil rights attorney focused on disability rights. She is the Directing Attorney of Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF),[1] a position she has held since 1981. She has provided representation, consultation to counsel, and coordination of amicus briefs on key disability rights cases before all levels of federal court, including the U.S. Supreme Court. She was appointed by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education to the Civil Rights Reviewing Authority, responsible for reviewing civil rights decisions of the Department.[2][circular reference]
Ms. Mayerson was born and raised in Cincinnati, Ohio. She attended Boston University, where she received a degree in political science, from 1968 to 1971. She attended the University of California Boalt Hall School of Law, where she graduated Order of the Coif in 1977. As a law student she worked for Judge W. Arthur Garrity, who was overseeing Boston’s bussing program to achieve racial desegregation of the city’s public school system. From 1977 to 1978 she attended Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., where she obtained her Master of Laws degree and worked as a graduate fellow for the Institute for Public Representation, Georgetown University Law Center.[citation needed]
Career
Ms. Mayerson joined the legal staff of the Disability Law Resource Center, of the Berkeley Center for Independent Living, in 1978, the predecessor of the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF). She served as the Directing Attorney with DREDF from 1981 through 2019.[citation needed]
As DREDF’s Directing Attorney, Ms. Mayerson represented members of Congress, former government officials and the disability community in the U.S. Supreme Court in cases interpreting federal disability rights laws. She served as party co-counsel in the high court consideration of Alexander v. Choate, 569 U.S. (1985) (scope of Section 504).[5] She represented members of Congress in high court amicus filings in Sutton v. United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471 (ADA definition of disability);[6]Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624 (1998) (ADA definition of disability); and School Bd. of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987) (scope of Section 504).[7] She represented former U.S. Attorney General Thornburgh in amicus filings in United States v. Georgia, 546 U.S. 151 (2006) (ADA constitutionality)[8] and Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004)(ADA constitutionality).[9] She also represented the disability community in high court amicus filings in Toyota v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002) (ADA definition of disability);[10]Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187 (1996) (Section 504 coverage of federal government);[11]City of Cleburne v. Cleburne, 473 U.S. 432 (1985) (level of constitutional scrutiny afforded to disability); and Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone, 465 U.S. 624 (1984) (scope of Section 504).[12]
She led litigation that resulted in an opinion finding that Internet only businesses like Netflix are covered by the ADA. National Ass’n of the Deaf v. Netflix, Inc., 869 F.Supp.2d 196 (D. Mass. 2012).[13] This ruling enabled DREDF to attain agreements on captioning with all of the other major streamers, changing a major source of entertainment for millions of deaf and hard of hearing people. Ms. Mayerson was also a lead counsel on litigation against Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology[14] for failing to caption videos intended for the public. The recent settlements in those cases, after five years of litigation, now set the standard for universities across the nation.
Ms. Mayerson brought the first ADA case challenging the failure of preschools to assist children with diabetes in basic diabetes care.[15] The case challenged the idea that licensed personnel were needed to provide basic care, performed at home by parents and siblings. The victory led to litigation challenging the California Department of Education (CDE) and local school districts for failing to provide diabetes care in grades K-12. This litigation led to a settlement with the CDE to ensure that all students in public schools receive the care they need to be safe at school. The settlement established a statewide policy that recognized the preeminence of the ADA and the IDEA over State licensing rules. The policy was challenged by the nurses unions. After years of litigation, the California Supreme Court unanimously upheld the rights of school children with diabetes to receive the care they need at school.[16]
Her work includes the development of special education-related legal remedies to challenge restraint and seclusion in K-12 schools, and to combat the school-to-prison pipeline that disproportionately affects African American boys in public schools.[17]
She also served as plaintiff counsel in Sacramento City Unified School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Holland, 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied 512 U.S. 1207 (1994), an early landmark case upholding the rights of children with disabilities to be fully included with their non-disabled peers in school. Other class action cases include Emma C. v. Eastin, Civ. No. 96-4179-TEH (N.D. Cal.) (educational rights); Mark Chambers, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, Case No. C-06-06346 WHA (N.D. Cal.) (community integration); K.C., et al. v. O'Connell, et al. Case No. 05- CV-04077 MMC (N.D. Cal.) (educational rights).
In addition to her position at DREDF, Ms. Mayerson has served as a lecturer in disability law at the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law (now Berkeley Law) since 1987. She also taught at Stanford, Golden Gate, Santa Clara, and Davis law schools. In 1995, she was appointed by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, Secretary Riley, to the Civil Rights Reviewing Authority, responsible for reviewing all civil rights decisions of the Department of Education, and she served in that capacity for two three year terms.
Publications
Americans with Disabilities Act Annotated-Legislative History, Regulations & Commentary - A three-volume treatise which sets forth the legislative history and regulations for each provision of the ADA.[18]
Disability Rights Law: Roots, Present Challenges, and Future Collaborations - Disability rights and legal aid lawyers must collaborate to fix the damage caused by the US Supreme Court’s decisions narrowing the protections and remedies for people with disabilities. Clearinghouse Review, Vol. 41, Nos.5-6, Sept-Oct 2007.[19]
The History of the ADA, A Movement Perspective 1992[20][21]
Awards and recognition
The American Diabetes Association Public Policy Award (1997)[22]
The John and Elizabeth Boalt Lecturer Award (2013)[23]
Stanford Speech: Regarding How the ADA Came About, July 1993
7th Circuit Judges Workshop: ADA Speech, Kohler, Wisconsin, May 1-3, 1996
Villanova Law Review Symposium: Defining the Parameters of Coverage Under the ADA, 1997
University of Michigan Law School Speech: ADA and the U.S. Supreme Court, November 2-4, 2000
Ohio State Law Journal Symposium: Facing the Challenges of the ADA - The First Ten Years and Beyond, 2001
The History of the ADA: A Movement Perspective, 1992
Garrett Panel Speech, January 16, 2002
Testimony before Joint Congressional Committee, December 1990
The Supreme Court: Setbacks for Disability Rights, Boalt Conference, March 14, 2002
SF Bar Association MCLE Training Presentation, July 27, 2004
Caste to Class: Busting Barriers Along the Road to Citizenship, Wayne State University Law School, February 26, 2008
Keynote Speech: U.S. Supreme Court, Boalt Disability Law Society Symposium Dinner, March 14, 2002
Related Research Articles
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or ADA is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which made discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, and other characteristics illegal, and later sexual orientation and gender identity. In addition, unlike the Civil Rights Act, the ADA also requires covered employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, and imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations.
Richard Lewis Thornburgh was an American lawyer, author, and politician who served as the 76th United States attorney general from 1988 to 1991 under presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. A Republican, he previously served as the 41st governor of Pennsylvania and as the U.S. attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a piece of American legislation that ensures students with a disability are provided with a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) that is tailored to their individual needs. IDEA was previously known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA) from 1975 to 1990. In 1990, the United States Congress reauthorized EHA and changed the title to IDEA. Overall, the goal of IDEA is to provide children with disabilities the same opportunity for education as those students who do not have a disability.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a United States federal law, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The principal sponsor of the bill was Rep. John Brademas (D-IN-3). The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 replaces preexisting laws to extend and revise the authorization of grants to States for vocational rehabilitation services, with special emphasis on services to those with the most severe disabilities, to expand special Federal responsibilities and research and training programs with respect to individuals with disabilities, to establish special responsibilities in the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare for coordination of all programs with respect to individuals with disabilities within the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and for other purposes. It created the Rehabilitation Services Administration.
The right to a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) is an educational entitlement of all students in the United States who are identified as having a disability, guaranteed by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
A reasonable accommodation is an adjustment made in a system to accommodate or make fair the same system for an individual based on a proven need. That need can vary. Accommodations can be religious, physical, mental or emotional, academic, or employment-related, and law often mandates them. Each country has its own system of reasonable accommodations. The United Nations use this term in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, saying refusal to make accommodation results in discrimination. It defines a "reasonable accommodation" as:
... necessary and appropriate modification and adjustments not imposing a disproportionate or undue burden, where needed in a particular case, to ensure to persons with disabilities the enjoyment or exercise on an equal basis with others of all human rights and fundamental freedoms;
The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) is an American legal organization founded by former Reagan Administration official Robert B. Carleson in 1998 as a conservative counter to the American Civil Liberties Union.
The Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates (COPAA) is an independent national American association of parents of children with disabilities, attorneys, advocates, and related professionals who protect the legal and civil rights of students with disabilities and their families. COPAA has a 22-member Board of Directors who run the organization. Board members are selected to be representative of diversity of COPAA's peer-to-peer network and have significant experience in various aspects of COPAA's work. Currently COPAA has more than 3400 members in all states, the District of Columbia and several territories. Over 90% of all of its members, including professionals, are people with disabilities or parents and family members of people with disabilities. COPAA accomplishes its mission largely through the work of its network of volunteers, who are supported by the staff of the organization.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is American legislation that guarantees certain rights to people with disabilities. It was one of the first U.S. federal civil rights laws offering protection for people with disabilities. It set precedents for subsequent legislation for people with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990.
Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding discrimination against people with mental disabilities. The Supreme Court held that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with mental disabilities have the right to live in the community rather than in institutions if, in the words of the opinion of the Court, "the State's treatment professionals have determined that community placement is appropriate, the transfer from institutional care to a less restrictive setting is not opposed by the affected individual, and the placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available to the State and the needs of others with mental disabilities." The case was brought by the Atlanta Legal Aid Society on behalf of Lois Curtis.
The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 is an Act of Congress, effective January 1, 2009, that amended the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and other disability nondiscrimination laws at the Federal level of the United States.
The ministerial exception, sometimes known as the ecclesiastical exception, is a legal doctrine in the United States barring the application of anti-discrimination laws to religious institutions' employment of ministers or as to jobs with ministerial roles. As explained by the Supreme Court in the landmark 2012 case Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. E.E.O.C., the exception is drawn from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and serves two purposes: to safeguard the freedom of religious groups "to select their own ministers" and to prevent "government involvement in [...] ecclesiastical decisions". The first purpose is rooted in the Free Exercise Clause; the second, in the Establishment Clause. When the ministerial exception applies, it gives religious institutions an affirmative defense against lawsuits for discrimination. For example, a woman seeking to become a Catholic priest cannot sue the Catholic Church for sex discrimination over its position that women cannot be ordained as priests. The Supreme Court later elaborated on when employees qualify as ministerial – and thus how broadly the exception applies – in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (2020).
This disability rights timeline lists events relating to the civil rights of people with disabilities in the United States of America, including court decisions, the passage of legislation, activists' actions, significant abuses of people with disabilities, and the founding of various organizations. Although the disability rights movement itself began in the 1960s, advocacy for the rights of people with disabilities started much earlier and continues to the present.
The Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), located in Berkeley, California, and Washington, DC, US, is a national cross-disability civil rights law and policy center directed by individuals with disabilities and parents who have children with disabilities. Founded in 1979, DREDF advances the civil and human rights of people with disabilities through legal advocacy, training, education, and public policy and legislative development.
Marilyn Golden was an American disability rights activist, most notably in the area of transportation. For many years she was a policy analyst at the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF). She served on the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board from 1996 until 2005. She had previously worked as the Director of Access California, which was a "resource center on architectural accessibility run by the City of Oakland". She also worked as Co-Coordinator of the Disabled International Support Effort, which aided disability organizations in developing nations. She opposed assisted suicide and fought against assisted suicide legislation in California, Hawaii, and Vermont. She also lobbied for the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools, 580 U.S. 154 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986 does not command exhaustion of state-level administrative remedies codified in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when the gravamen of the plaintiff's lawsuit is not related to the denial of free appropriate public education (FAPE).
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School Dist. RE–1, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), required schools to provide students an education that is "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances." In a unanimous opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court vacated the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Andrew ("Drew") I. Batavia was a disability rights activist, health policy researcher, author, and associate professor at Florida International University who, at the age of 16, sustained a spinal cord injury. He earned a JD from Harvard Law School and an MS in health services research from Stanford University Medical School, and as a White House Fellow (1990) worked under Attorney General Dick Thornburgh to draft regulations for the Americans with Disabilities Act. In 2002, he co-founded Autonomy, Inc., to represent persons with disabilities who wanted choices and control over their lives, including the choice to end it for those with disabilities who were terminally ill.
Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 598 U.S. 142 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for denial of a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) can proceed without exhausting the administrative procedures of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), because compensatory damages are not available under IDEA. This case holds significant implications for disabled students who allege they were failed by school officials.
Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer, 601 U.S. 1 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding standing to sue under the Americans With Disabilities Act.
↑ Young, Jonathan M (1997). Equality of Opportunity: The Making of the Americans with Disabilities Act(PDF). National Council on Disability. Retrieved August 31, 2020. The lead attorney for the disability community, and the one who most often testified before Congress on behalf of the ADA, was Arlene Mayerson of DREDF. She had worked extensively on the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act, Civil Rights Restoration Act, and Fair Housing Amendments Act, and had submitted countless briefs to various committees and courts. Especially significant was her role in passing the Handicapped Children's Protection Act.
↑ "ALEXANDER v. CHOATE". caselaw.findlaw.com. Retrieved August 6, 2020. Gordon Bonnyman argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Brian Paddock, Arlene Mayerson, J. LeVonne Chambers, and Eric Schnapper.
↑ "UNITED STATES v. GEORGIA ET AL". scholar.google.com. Retrieved August 6, 2020. ...and for Dick Thornburgh et al. by Charles D. Siegal, Bradley S. Phillips, Daniel P. Collins, Peter Blanck, Arlene Mayerson, and Eve Hill.
↑ "TENNESSEE v.LANE ET AL". scholar.google.com. Retrieved August 6, 2020. ...and for the Honorable Dick Thornburgh et al. by Arlene B. Mayerson, Claudia Center, and Elizabeth Kristen.
↑ "LANE v.PENA, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL". scholar.google.com. Retrieved August 6, 2020. Linda D. Kilb, Arlene B. Mayerson, and Patricia Shiu filed a brief for the American Association of Retired Persons et al. as amici curiae urging reversal.
↑ American Nurses Association., et al. vs. Jack O'Connell, et al.; American Diabetes Association, Intervenor, Case No. 07AS04631 (Sacramento Cty. Superior Ct.) (educational rights); American Nurses Ass'n, et al. v. Jack O'Connell, et al, Case No. C061150 (Cal. Court of Appeals, 3d Appellate Dist.)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
