The Hon. The Chief Justice Arun Bhansali | |
---|---|
Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court | |
Assumed office 5 February 2024 | |
Nominated by | D. Y. Chandrachud |
Appointed by | Droupadi Murmu |
Preceded by | Pritinker Diwaker |
Judge of Rajasthan High Court | |
In office 8 January 2013 –4 February 2024 | |
Nominated by | Altamas Kabir |
Appointed by | Pranab Mukherjee |
Personal details | |
Born | 15 October 1967 |
Nationality | Indian |
Alma mater | University of Rajasthan |
Arun Bhansali (born 15 October 1967) is an Indian Judge. He is serving as the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court since 5 February 2024. He is also the Member of Advisory - cum - Consultative panel for National Legal Service Authority (NALSA) and the Member of,National Court Management System Committee (NCMSC). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
After completing his LLB and enrolling as a lawyer in 1989,Bhansali worked in various legal domains. Prior to being a judge,he worked at the Rajasthan High Court in Jodhpur,in diverse legal areas,ranging from taxes and corporate law to civil and constitutional matters. Bhansali's legal expertise was also sought by numerous corporate entities and governmental bodies. He was retained by organizations such as the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd.,companies and trusts related to erstwhile Royal Family of Udaipur (1996–2013),and was Standing Counsel for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2004–2013),Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department (2012–2013),HPCL –Mittal Energy Ltd and Panel Lawyer for Bank of Baroda,Canara Bank,Central Bank of India and Vijaya Bank. He was also involved in public service,including as a standing counsel for government departments and agencies. [1] [5]
Bhansali was elevated to Judge of the Rajasthan High Court on 8 January 2013.
An appeal against conviction for offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced for life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- with default stipulation to undergo six months' additional simple imprisonment. A division bench consisting of Arun Bhansali and Rajendra Prakash Soni,JJ.,after appreciation of evidence,oral as well as documentary,and the circumstances of the case and conduct of the accused in not offering any explanation for the homicidal death of her five-month-old child,held the trial court has rightly convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC. [5]
While allowing a petition challenging the cancellation of the petitioner's candidature for the post of Teacher Grade III (Level I),A single-judge bench consisting of Bhansali quashed the determination made by respondents and held that since Association of Indian Universities (AIU) had issued an equivalence certificate with regard to the qualification of the petitioner,the same made her eligible for the post. [5]
A writ petition challenging the position of law prior to the amendment of Rule 2(c) of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant Rules,1996,which excluded the married daughter from the definition of 'dependent',for the purpose of compassionate appointment vide Notification dated 28 October 2021,a three judge bench (of Sandeep Mehta,Vijay Bishnoi and Bhansali) held that the provision of Rule 2(c) of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant Rules,1996,which exclude the married daughter from definition of dependent prior to its amendment vide notification dated 28.10.2021,is discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 to 16 of the Constitution of India and as such,the word 'unmarried' from the definition of 'dependent',is struck down.
Further,in Rule 5 of Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Servant Rules,1996 also the word unmarried daughters/adopted unmarried daughter,shall be read as daughters/adopted daughter. "Marriage does not determine the continuance of the relationship of a child,whether a son or a daughter,with the parents. A son continues to be a son both before and after marriage. A daughter continues to be a daughter. This relationship is not affected either in fact or in law upon marriage. Marriage does not bring about a severance of the relationship between a father and mother and their son or between parents and their daughter. Our society is governed by constitutional principles. Marriage cannot be regarded as a justifiable ground to define and exclude from who constitutes a member of the family when the state has adopted a social welfare policy which is grounded on dependency." [5]
While disposing of a writ petition filed by the petitioner requesting to make pay fixation of the petitioner equal to similarly situated teachers,a single-judge bench consisting of Arun Bhansali,* J.,directed the State to consider representations of petitioners for providing equal pay to similar positioned teachers. The Court reiterated the direction of the Jaipur Bench,"In case,a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period,the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However,in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order." [5]
The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial authority and the highest court of the Republic of India. It is the final court of appeal for all civil and criminal cases in India. It also has the power of judicial review. The Supreme Court,which consists of the Chief Justice of India and a maximum of fellow 33 judges,has extensive powers in the form of original,appellate and advisory jurisdictions.
Allahabad High Court,officially known as High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,is the high court based in the city of Prayagraj,formerly known as Allahabad,that has jurisdiction over the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It was established on 17 March 1866,making it one of the oldest high courts to be established in India.
Prashant Bhushan is an Indian author and a public interest lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. He was a member of the faction of the India Against Corruption (IAC) movement known as Team Anna which supported Anna Hazare's campaign for the implementation of the Jan Lokpal Bill. After a split in IAC,he helped Team Anna form the Aam Aadmi Party. In 2015,he made several allegations against the party's leadership,its functioning and its deviation from the core ideology,values and commitments. He is one of the founders of Swaraj Abhiyan and Sambhaavnaa,an Institute of Public Policy and Politics.
India does not recognise same-sex marriage,civil unions or other forms of partnerships,but provides some limited legal recognition to cohabiting same-sex couples in the form of live-in relationships. Several same-sex couples have married in traditional Hindu ceremonies since the late 1980s;however,these marriages are not registered with the state and couples do not enjoy all the same rights and benefits as married opposite-sex couples. The Supreme Court of India in August 2022 provided social security rights to those in same-sex live-in relationships while also recognising same-sex couples as being part of a "family unit".
Ranjan Gogoi is an Indian former advocate and judge who served as the 46th Chief Justice of India from 2018 to 2019,having previously served as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India from 2012 to 2018. He is currently a Member of the Rajya Sabha,having been nominated by President Ram Nath Kovind on 16 March 2020. Gogoi served as a judge in the Gauhati High Court from 2001 to 2010,and then was transferred as a judge to the Punjab and Haryana High Court from 2010 to 2011 where he later was the Chief Justice from 2011 to 2012. He is also a member of the Committee on External Affairs in the Rajya Sabha.
Volks NO v Robinson and Others is an important decision in South African family law and law of succession. In a majority judgment written by Justice Thembile Skweyiya,the Constitutional Court of South Africa dismissed a challenge to the constitutionality of the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act,1990. The court held that it is not discriminatory for the Act to exclude the survivors of permanent life partnerships from the protections it extends to the survivors of legal marriages. Married couples are entitled to claim maintenance from their deceased spouse's estate because the institution of marriage creates unique reciprocal duties of support which do not exist between permanent life partners.
Nuthalapati Venkata Ramana is a former Indian judge and journalist who served as the 48th Chief Justice of India.
The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was a proposed body which would have been responsible for the recruitment,appointment and transfer of judicial officers,legal officers and legal employees under the government of India and in all state governments of India. The commission was established by amending the Constitution of India through the 99th constitution amendment with the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act,2014 or 99th Constitutional Amendment Act-2014 passed by the Lok Sabha on 13 August 2014 and by the Rajya Sabha on 14 August 2014. The NJAC would have replaced the collegium system for the appointment of judges as invoked by the Supreme Court via judicial fiat by a new system. Along with the Constitution Amendment Act,the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act,2014,was also passed by the Parliament of India to regulate the functions of the National Judicial Appointments Commission. The NJAC Bill and the Constitutional Amendment Bill,was ratified by 16 of the state legislatures in India,and subsequently assented by the President of India Pranab Mukherjee on 31 December 2014. The NJAC Act and the Constitutional Amendment Act came into force from 13 April 2015.
Pankaj Mithal is a Judge of The Supreme Court of India. He is the former Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court. Previously,he has also served as the Chief Justice of the Jammu &Kashmir and Ladakh High Court and Judge of the Allahabad High Court.
Brijgopal Harkishan Loya (1966–2014) was an Indian judge who served in a special court which deals with matters relating to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). He was presiding over the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case,and died on 1 December 2014 in Nagpur. A bench of the Supreme Court of India,headed by the Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra,on April 19,2018,dismissed the public interest petition (PIL),and stated the death to be natural and such petitions to be an attack on the Judiciary.
Justice Akil Abdulhamid Kureshi is an Indian judge. He is former Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court and Tripura High Court. He has also served as Judge of Bombay High Court and Gujarat High Court,of which he has also served as an Acting Chief Justice.
Sunita Agarwal is an Indian Judge. Presently,she is Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court. She is a former judge of the Allahabad High Court.
Justice Ratnavel Pandian Subbiah is a sitting Judge of the Charted High Court of Madras. Subbiah is the Executive Chairman for the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority. He was elevated as a Judge of High Court of Madras on 24 March 2008.
S Sushma &Anr. versus Commissioner of Police&Ors.(2021) is a landmark decision of the Madras High Court that prohibited practice of "conversion therapy" by medical professionals in India. The court directed comprehensive measures to sensitize the society and various branches of the Union and State governments to remove prejudices against the queer community.
Munishwar Nath Bhandari is an Indian Judge. He is former Chief Justice of Madras High Court and currently serving as the Chairman,Appellate Tribunal under SAFEM Act,1976. He has also served as Acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court and Allahabad High Court and Judge of Allahabad High Court and Rajasthan High Court.
Rohit Sagar &Anr. versus State of Uttarakhand &Ors.(2021), a decision of the Uttarakhand High Court,established the right of legal adults to select their own partners and instructed the police to ensure the couple's safety and safeguard their property.
Chinmayee Jena versus State of Odisha &Ors.(2020) is case where the Orissa High Court upheld the right of self-determination of gender as an integral part of personal autonomy and self-expression. The court recognized the rights of trans persons to cohabit with the partner of their choice,regardless of the “gender”of the partner.
Ujjawal &Anr. versus State of Haryana&Ors.(2021),a case where Punjab and Haryana High Court,refused to provide police protection to a couple facing threat to their lives and personal liberty,citing potential disruption to "social fabric of the society."
Devu G. Nair versus State Of Kerala &Ors. (2023) is an ongoing Supreme Court case,poised to examine the legality of Conversion Therapy and addressing whether the High Court should have facilitated the alleged detainee's opportunity to provide their statement in person within the secure confines of the High Court building.