Association for the Study of Abortion

Last updated

The Association for the Study of Abortion (ASA) was an American organization founded around 1965 [lower-alpha 1] dedicated to the study of abortion and advocacy for the liberalization of abortion law. Its founding members included the obstetrician-gynecologists Alan F. Guttmacher (then president of Planned Parenthood) and Robert E. Hall, who served as the organization's initial chairman. [1]

Contents

ASA funded research as well as educational material aimed at the public. It initially took a conservative approach to the reform of abortion law, though it later embraced the more radical cause of repeal, and provided support to the attorneys who argued the landmark Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade in 1973. The organization was dissolved after the success of Roe v. Wade, which found that women had a constitutional right to an abortion. [5]

ASA was founded in New York, but had a national focus, and was the only national-level abortion rights organization until the founding of the pro-repeal NARAL in 1969. [2] : 24–25 

Background

At the time of the organization's founding, all US states criminalized abortion, generally with the sole exception of those necessary to save the life of the mother. [3] Since medical technology had mostly eliminated scenarios where abortion was required as a life-saving measure, the net effect was that legal abortions were almost never performed. [6] Some states such as New Hampshire, New York, and California had seen attempts to reform their statute to increase access, for example, by adding allowances to preserve the physical or mental health of the mother, or for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, but none had yet succeeded. [3] These efforts had generally been led by (male) doctors, and it was not until the late 1960s that abortion rights would be taken up as a feminist cause. [4] : 276 

Founding and membership

ASA was founded in New York in February 1965 as the Association for Humane Abortion, but voted to change its name to the "Association for the Study of Abortion" the following month. It grew out of the Committee for a Humane Abortion Law, which was created in 1964 by the Westchester Ethical Society. [3]

It maintained a voting membership of around 20, mostly consisting of doctors, lawyers, and other professionals. [2] : 15 

Goals and ideology

The organization's stated goals were to sponsor, collect, and analyse research of abortion and of public attitudes toward abortion, as well as to advocate for greater understanding of "the abortion problem" among the public. [3]

Like most early abortion advocacy groups, the ASA initially took a conservative approach of advocating for the "reform" of abortion law—for example by legalizing abortion in a wider range of cases of "medical necessity" beyond those which threatened the life of the mother—rather than "repeal" (i.e. legal abortion on demand). Some members who disagreed with this approach would go on to found the more radical National Association for Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL) in 1969, including Lawrence Lader and Ruth Proskauer Smith. [2] : 16  ASA would later come to embrace the repeal position by the time of Roe v. Wade.

Activities

In 1966, ASA publicized the results of a nationwide poll they had conducted showing that an overwhelming majority of psychiatrists supported liberalizing abortion law, though less than a quarter supported complete repeal. [6]

In 1968, the organization sponsored a research conference in Hot Springs, Virginia in which the "vacuum suction" method of abortion was introduced to American practitioners; its better safety profile would lead to it eventually replacing dilation and curettage as the standard method for first-trimester abortions. [7] [1]

A 1972 ASA memo issued by director Jimmye Kimmey has been cited by authors Linda Greenhouse and Reva B. Siegel as introducing the rhetoric of a "right to choose" (which would later morph into the label "pro-choice") among abortion rights activists. Kimmey specifically identified a need to find a counter to the "right to life" slogan which was being successfully employed by anti-abortion groups. [8]

ASA supported the petitioners in the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade . In particular, they connected the lawyers arguing the case with experts such as Harriet Pilpel, and helped coordinate the submission of 42 amicus curiae briefs from sympathetic organizations. [2] : 15–16  They also funded legal scholarship by Cyril Means which was cited in the court's decision. [2] ASA had also funded legal scholarship by Roy Lucas in the late 1960s which originated the theory followed by the Roe v. Wade decision: that a constitutional right to privacy (first discussed in the 1965 case Griswold v. Connecticut ) protected a woman's right to choose an abortion. [9] [10] The organization ceased operations after the Roe v. Wade decision was handed down. [5]

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Sources variously give ASA's founding year as either 1964 [1] [2] or 1965 [3] [4] . Shaffer 1965 describes the ASA as an "outgrowth" of a committee founded in 1964, which may explain this discrepancy.

Related Research Articles

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protected a right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many abortion laws, and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court upheld the right to have an abortion as established by the "essential holding" of Roe v. Wade (1973) and issued as its "key judgment" the restoration of the undue burden standard when evaluating state-imposed restrictions on that right. Both the essential holding of Roe and the key judgment of Casey were overturned by the Supreme Court in 2022, with its landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States abortion-rights movement</span> Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that sanctions any form of criminal punishment to all forms of private, consensual non-procreative adult sexual activities between two individuals are unconstitutional. The Court reaffirmed the concept of a "right to privacy" that earlier cases had found the U.S. Constitution provides, even though it is not explicitly enumerated. It based its ruling on the notions of personal autonomy to define one's own relationships and of American traditions of non-interference with any or all forms of private sexual activities between consenting adults.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span> Termination of a pregnancy in the United States

The United States is a global outlier among developed countries on the issue of abortion, with the subject being divisible in American politics and culture wars to an extent not found elsewhere. There are widely different abortion laws depending on state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Blackmun</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1970 to 1994

Harry Andrew Blackmun was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1970 to 1994. Appointed by President Richard Nixon, Blackmun ultimately became one of the most liberal justices on the Court. He is best known as the author of the Court's opinion in Roe v. Wade.

Reproductive Freedom for All, formerly NARAL Pro-Choice America and commonly known as simply NARAL, is a non-profit 501(c)(4) organization in the United States that engages in lobbying, political action, and advocacy efforts to oppose restrictions on abortion, to expand access to abortion and birth control, and to support paid parental leave and protection against pregnancy discrimination.

The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) is the oldest and largest national anti-abortion organization in the United States with affiliates in all 50 states and more than 3,000 local chapters nationwide.

Reva B. Siegel is the Nicholas deB. Katzenbach Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Siegel's writing draws on legal history to explore questions of law and inequality, and to analyze how courts interact with representative government and popular movements in interpreting the Constitution. She is currently writing on the role of social movement conflict in guiding constitutional change, addressing this question in recent articles on reproductive rights, originalism and the Second Amendment, the "de facto ERA," and the enforcement of Brown. Her publications include Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking ; The Constitution in 2020 ; and Directions in Sexual Harassment Law. Professor Siegel received her B.A., M.Phil, and J.D. from Yale University, clerked for Judge Spottswood William Robinson III on the D.C. Circuit, and began teaching at the University of California at Berkeley. She is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and is active in the American Society for Legal History, the Association of American Law Schools, the American Constitution Society, in the national organization and as faculty advisor of Yale's chapter. She was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States anti-abortion movement</span> Movement in the United States opposing abortion

The United States anti-abortion movement contains elements opposing induced abortion on both moral and religious grounds and supports its legal prohibition or restriction. Advocates generally argue that human life begins at conception and that the human zygote, embryo or fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. The anti-abortion movement includes a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body. There are diverse arguments and rationales for the anti-abortion stance. Some anti-abortion activists allow for some permissible abortions, including therapeutic abortions, in exceptional circumstances such as incest, rape, severe fetal defects, or when the woman's health is at risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linda Coffee</span> American lawyer (born 1942)

Linda Nellene Coffee is an American lawyer living in Dallas, Texas. Coffee is best known, along with Sarah Weddington, for arguing the precedent-setting United States Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion-rights movements</span> Social movement advocating for legal access to abortion

Abortion-rights movements, also self-styled as pro-choice movements, advocate for the right to have legal access to induced abortion services including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancy without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

Patricia Theresa "Pat" Maginnis was considered the first abortion rights activist in American history. She was one part of the "Army of Three", the grass-roots collective that would eventually become NARAL Pro-Choice America and that founded the Society for Humane Abortion. She was also a political cartoonist, painter, and peace activist. In 2018, she was chosen by the National Women's History Alliance as one of its honorees for Women's History Month in the United States.

Abortion in California is legal up to the point of fetal viability. An abortion ban was in place by 1900, and by 1950, it was a criminal offense for a woman to have an abortion. In 1962, the American Law Institute published their model penal code as it applied to abortions, with three circumstances where they believed a physician could justifiably perform an abortion, and California adopted a version of this code. In 2002, California passed a law guaranteeing women the right to have an abortion "prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman." In 2022, California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 1, which amended the Constitution of California to explicitly protect the right to abortion and contraception by a margin of 33.76%.

Abortion in Maryland is legal up to the point of fetal viability and later when necessary to preserve the life or health of the pregnant person. The first laws regulating abortion in the state were passed in 1867 and 1868, banning abortion except by a physician to "secure the safety of the mother." Abortion providers continued to operate both within and outside of the law. Legal enforcement became more strict from the 1940s through 60s, with numerous police raids on abortion providers. In 1968, Maryland passed a liberalized abortion law that clarified the wording of the previous law, allowing abortion in hospital settings in cases of rape, severe fetal deformity, or when life and health were endangered.

Abortion in New Mexico is legal at all stages of pregnancy. The number of abortion clinics in New Mexico has declined over the years, with 26 in 1982, 20 in 1992 and 11 in 2014. There were 4,500 legal abortions in 2014. There were 7 facilities providing abortion in New Mexico in 2017, and 6 of those were clinics. In 2017, 91% of New Mexico counties had no clinics that provided abortions, and 48% of New Mexico women lived in those counties.

Abortion in Puerto Rico is legal throughout pregnancy. On June 22, 2022, the Senate passed a bill limiting abortion to 22 weeks, with exceptions for danger to the mother's life, fetal defects, and if the fetus would not be viable. The bill will need to be considered by the House.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. The court's decision overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), returning to individual states the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not protected by federal law.

Pro-choice and pro-life are terms of self-identification used by the two sides of the abortion debate: those who support access to abortion, and those who seek to restrict it, respectively. They are generally considered loaded language, since they frame the corresponding position in terms of inherently positive qualities. For this reason, more neutral or descriptive alternatives are sometimes preferred, for example by describing groups or individuals as supporters or opponents of abortion or abortion rights.

Robert Elliott Hall was an American obstetrician, psychiatrist, professor, and early advocate for the liberalization of abortion law in the United States. He founded the Association for the Study of Abortion with Alan F. Guttmacher in 1965, the first national abortion-rights organization in the country, and served as its chair. He and Guttmacher were considered the two most prominent physicians advocating for liberalization of abortion law in the US. Hall published many medical papers, as well as materials aimed at the general public, particularly relating to abortion law.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Joffe, Carol; Weitz, T.A.; Stacey, C.L. (20 September 2004). "Uneasy allies: pro-choice physicians, feminist health activists and the struggle for abortion rights". Sociology of Health and Illness. 26 (6): 775–796. doi:10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00418.x. PMID   15383041.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Staggenborg, Suzanne (1991). The Pro-choice movement: organization and activism in the abortion conflict. Oxford University Press.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Shaffer, H. B. (1965). "Abortion in law and medicine". Editorial Research Reports.
  4. 1 2 Greenhouse, Linda; Siegel, Reva (2012). Before Roe V. Wade: Voices that Shaped the Abortion Debate Before the Supreme Court's Ruling (PDF) (2 ed.). Yale Law School. ISBN   9780615648217.
  5. 1 2 Hall, Robert E. (19 February 1984). "[Letter to the editor]". New York Times.
  6. 1 2 "Psychiatrists Back Abortion Reforms". New York Times. 31 March 1966.
  7. ↑ Joffe, Carol (1991). "Portraits of Three "Physicians of Conscience": Abortion before Legalization in the United States". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 2 (1): 53. JSTOR   3704098.
  8. ↑ Merelli, Annalisa (28 January 2017). "A brief history of a marketing masterpiece: branding the anti-abortion movement "pro-life"". Quartz.
  9. ↑ Greenhouse, Linda (25 January 1970). "Constitutional Question: Is There a Right to Abortion?". New York Times.
  10. ↑ Urbina, Ian (7 November 2003). "Roy Lucas, 61, Legal Theorist Who Helped Shape Roe Suit". New York Times.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.