Aston Group

Last updated

Aston Group is the designation of a group of organizational researchers who pursued their research between 1961 and 1970 under the leadership of Derek S. Pugh. The official name was Industrial Administration Research Unit of the Birmingham College of Advanced Technology.And In 2014 the Group's revenue decreased by 9.8%, following decreases in sales ... (UK) Limited, Annual Revenue. $21.79 million USD for 2019. Birmingham College was renamed to Aston University in 1966. [1] [2] The Aston Group pioneered works in the area of statistical analysis of organizations and their functioning. Contrary to former analysis' which were based on binary factors of features - such as presence vs. absence - the group expanded the spectrum to continuous dimensions and achieved a more differentiated view of their research subject. [3]

Members of the group originated in different areas of research such as psychology, economics, political sciences and sociology. Amongst others, John Child, David Hickson, Bob Hinings, Roy Payne, Diana Pheysey, and Charles McMillan published under the Aston-label. As did several other researchers. Remarkably, the Aston group was never associated with a single member, not even its leader Derek S. Pugh. [4]

Research

In a summary, Derek Pugh describes the works of the Aston group. [5] According to him, there is no complete theory formulated out of the Aston findings. Their theories and results are embedded in the works of several topics of research. These topic were, according to Greenwood and Devine: [6]

  1. Derek Pugh, David Hickson and C.R. (Bob) Hinings with the relations of organizational structures and their influencers technology, size and environment.
  2. Diane Pheysey, Kerr Inkson and Roy Payne worked on the relation of organizational structure and organizational climate
  3. Lex Donaldson, John Child and Charles McMillan expanded the Aston-research for performance management and culture-spanning analysis'.

Malcolm Warner maintains "There is a potentially brilliant empirical theory of organizations to be written by the Aston gurus". [7] But such a theory was never published.

A typical result from the early phase of their works is the following matrix, reflecting an early means of analyzing the extent of bureaucratization in organizations. From empirical research in 46 enterprises in the Birmingham area, the group concluded:

Both results confirm empirically the expectation but do not explain the result. Based on the findings, the researchers concluded that organizations where more structure is imposed and power gets concentrated tend to become more bureaucratic.

Power/
Structurization [4]
Structuring of activities
LowHigh
Concentration
of
authority
HighPersonal
bureaucracies
Full
bureaucracies
LowNon-
bureaucracies
Workflow-
bureaucracies

Based on measurable dimensions - the amount of written instructions - and a structural analysis of the power-concentration, the bureaucracy-level of an organization can easily be determined.

In an expansion and building upon the works of Max Weber, who only recognized one bureaucracy, the Aston group found a taxonomy of different types with distinguishable features and characteristics based on only three factors: concentration of authority, structuring and attention to rules. The causal relationship postulated by the group assumed that with concentration of authority within an organization, the variety of roles decreases and therefore the interpersonal interaction and motivated innovation and flexibility decreases. [5] The factors are interconnected and influence each other. As a result, bureaucracies reduce innovation. [5]

In a British-Canadian cooperation, group members David J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, C. A. Lee, R. E. Schneck and J. M. Pennings developed the contingency approach to organizational power, in full the strategic "contingencies theory of interaorganizational power". [8] According to this theory, power rests on three pillars: [9] [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organization</span> Social entity established to meet needs or pursue goals

An organization or organisation, is an entity—such as a company, an institution, or an association—comprising one or more people and having a particular purpose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leadership</span> Quality of one individual or group influencing or guiding others based on authority

Leadership, both as a research area and as a practical skill, encompasses the ability of an individual, group or organization to "lead", influence or guide other individuals, teams, or entire organizations. The word "leadership" often gets viewed as a contested term. Specialist literature debates various viewpoints on the concept, sometimes contrasting Eastern and Western approaches to leadership, and also North American versus European approaches.

Reviewing request.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organizational theory</span> Type of theory

A theory involves concepts or constructs that are related in such a way as to explain why certain phenomena occur. An organizational theory involves a set of concepts/constructs that are related to each other and explain how individuals behave in social units we call organizations. Organizational theory also attempts to explain how interrelated units of organization do or do not connect with each other. Organizational theory also concerns understanding how groups of individuals behave, which may differ from the behavior of an individual. The behavior organizational theory often focuses on is goal-directed. Organizational theory can cover intra-organizational as well as inter-organizational fields of study.

An organizational structure defines how activities such as task allocation, coordination, and supervision are directed toward the achievement of organizational aims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Blau</span> American sociologist (1918–2002)

Peter Michael Blau was an American sociologist and theorist. Born in Vienna, Austria, he immigrated to the United States in 1939. He completed his PhD doctoral thesis with Robert K. Merton at Columbia University in 1952, laying an early theory for the dynamics of bureaucracy. The next year, he was offered a professorship at the University of Chicago, where he taught from 1953 to 1970. He also taught as Pitt Professor at Cambridge University in Great Britain, as a senior fellow at King's College, and as a Distinguished Honorary professor at Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences which he helped to establish. In 1970 he returned to Columbia University, where he was awarded the lifetime position of Professor Emeritus. From 1988 to 2000 he taught as the Robert Broughton Distinguished Research Professor at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill in the same department as his wife, Judith Blau, while continuing to commute to New York to meet with graduate students and colleagues.

Span of control, also called span of management, is the term used in business management, particularly human resource management. The term refers to the number of subordinates or direct reports a supervisor is responsible for.

A contingency theory is an organizational theory that claims that there is no best way to organize a corporation, to lead a company, or to make decisions. Instead, the optimal course of action is contingent (dependent) upon the internal and external situation. Contingent leaders are flexible in choosing and adapting to succinct strategies to suit change in situation at a particular period in time in the running of the organization.

Innovation management is a combination of the management of innovation processes, and change management. It refers to product, business process, marketing and organizational innovation. Innovation management is the subject of ISO 56000 series standards being developed by ISO TC 279.

Hasso Spode is a German historian and sociologist.

Derek Salman Pugh was a British psychologist, business theorist and Emeritus Professor of International Management at the Open University, known for his work in the field of organisational development (OD), and particularly the Pugh Matrix, a tool within OD.

Stewart Clegg is a British-born Australian sociologist and organizational theorist, and a professor at the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS), where he is also the research director of CMOS.

Substitutes for leadership theory is a leadership theory first developed by Steven Kerr and John M. Jermier and published in Organizational Behavior and Human Performance in December 1978.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social network</span> Social structure made up of a set of social actors

A social network is a social structure made up of a set of social actors, sets of dyadic ties, and other social interactions between actors. The social network perspective provides a set of methods for analyzing the structure of whole social entities as well as a variety of theories explaining the patterns observed in these structures. The study of these structures uses social network analysis to identify local and global patterns, locate influential entities, and examine network dynamics.

The task-relationship model is defined by Forsyth as "a descriptive model of leadership which maintains that most leadership behaviors can be classified as performance maintenance or relationship maintenances." Task-oriented leadership is a behavioral approach in which the leader focuses on the tasks that need to be performed in order to meet certain goals, or to achieve a certain performance standard. Relationship-oriented leadership is a behavioral approach in which the leader focuses on the satisfaction, motivation and the general well-being of the team members.

David John Hickson was a British organizational theorist and Emeritus Professor of International Management and Organization at the Bradford University School of Management, known for his work in the field of organisational development (OD).

Gerald R. (Jerry) Salancik was an American organizational theorist, and Professor at Carnegie Mellon University. He is best known for his work with Jeffrey Pfeffer on "organizational decision making" and "the external control of organizations."

As stated by political scientist Samuel Krislov, representative bureaucracy is a notion that "broad social groups should have spokesman and officeholders in administrative as well as political positions". With this notion, representative bureaucracy is a form of representation that captures most or all aspects of a society's population in the governing body of the state.. An experimental study shows that representative bureaucracy can enhance perceived performance and fairness. This study finds that in a “no representation” scenario, respondents reported the lowest perceived performance and fairness, while in scenarios such as “proper representation” or “over representation” of women, they reported higher perceived performance and fairness.

Sociomateriality is a theory built upon the intersection of technology, work and organization, that attempts to understand "the constitutive entanglement of the social and the material in everyday organizational life." It is the result of considering how human bodies, spatial arrangements, physical objects, and technologies are entangled with language, interaction, and practices in organizing. Specifically, it examines the social and material aspects of technology and organization, but also emphasizes the centrality of materials within the communicative constitution of organizations. It offers a novel way to study technology at the workplace, since it allows researchers to study the social and the material simultaneously.

Heinrich Popitz was a German sociologist who worked towards a general sociological theory. Alongside thinkers like Helmut Schelsky, Hans Paul Bahrdt, Dieter Claessens, and others he was one of those sociologists in post-war Germany who founded their sociological reflections on insights from Philosophical Anthropology, thus creating an alternative to the then dominant paradigms of the Frankfurt School and Cologne School. His work revolves around the four central concepts power, norms, technology, and creativity.

References

  1. Erich Frese (1992) Organisationstheorie - Historische Entwicklung - Ansätze - Perspektiven; 2. ed. 1992 XVI,; Gabler Verlag; page 116 ff
  2. Derek Pugh: The Aston Research Programme; p. 124 ff. in Alan Bryman: Doing Research in Organizations, 1988, Routledge, ISBN   978-0-415-00258-5
  3. Michael J. Handel: The Sociology of Organizations: Classic, Contemporary and Critical Readings, 2002, Sage Publications, ISBN   978-0-7619-8766-6, S. 41 ff
  4. 1 2 Derek Pugh and David J. Hickson (ed) 1996; Writers on Organizations, 5th Edition 1996; Penguin Books, London
  5. 1 2 3 John B. Miner (2006) Organization Behaviour 2: Essential Theories of Process and Structure.; Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe
  6. Ron Greenwood and Kay Devine (1997). Inside Aston: A Conversation with Derek Pugh. Journal of Management Inquiry, 6, 200-208
  7. Malcolm Warner (1981) Review of Organization and Nation: The Aston Programme IV. Journal of Management Studies, 184 48-50
  8. Karl Sandner (1990) Prozesse der Macht - Zur Entstehung, Stabilisierung und Veränderung der Macht von Akteuren in Unternehmen; Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg; ISBN   3-790-80647-1
  9. David J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings; C. A. Lee, R. E. Schneck; J. M. Pennings (1971) A Strategic Contingencies' Theoriy of Intraorganizational Power; in Administrative Science Quarterly, 16. Yr. 1971; 2; P. 151-196; quoted in Karl Sandner (1990) Prozesse der Macht - Zur Entstehung, Stabilisierung und Veränderung der Macht von Akteuren in Unternehmen; Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg; ISBN   3-790-80647-1
  10. C. R. Hinings, David J. Hickson, J. M. Pennings, R. E. Schneck (1974) Structural Conditions of Intraorganizational Power; in Administrative Science Quarterly 19. Yr 1974; 1, p. 22-44; quoted in Karl Sandner (1990) Prozesse der Macht - Zur Entstehung, Stabilisierung und Veränderung der Macht von Akteuren in Unternehmen; Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg; ISBN   3-790-80647-1