Attraction (grammar)

Last updated

Attraction, in linguistics, is a type of error in language production that incorrectly extends a feature from one word in a sentence to another. [1] This can refer to agreement attraction, wherein a feature is assigned based on agreement with another word. This tends to happen in English with Subject Verb Agreement, especially where the subject is separated from the verb in a complex noun phrase structure. It can also refer to Case Attraction, which assigns features based on grammatical roles, or in dialectal forms of English, Negative Attraction which extends negation particles. [2]

Contents

Agreement attraction

Agreement attraction occurs when a verb agrees with a noun other than its subject. It most commonly occurs with complex subject noun phrases, a notable example of this appeared in the New Yorker:

Efforts to make English the official language is gaining strength throughout the U.S. [3]

The head of the subject noun phrase, "efforts", is plural, but the verb appears in a singular form because the local noun "language" in the interceding phrase is singular, and therefore attracts the production of the singular feature in "is". While Bock pointed to this example, it doesn't follow the more common pattern where the local nouns are plural and attract plural marking onto the verb, such as in the sentence:

"The key to the cabinets were missing" [3]

The tendency for plural nouns to elicit attraction more often is caused by a marking plurality as a feature, where singularity is considered part of the default, and that activation of the noun plurality marker is what attracts the plural verb form activation. [3] Agreement attraction not only appears with Subject Verb Agreement, but also with Object Verb agreement in WH-movement in English. Take this ungrammatical construction:

"Which flowers are the gardener planting" [4]

This sentence is ungrammatical because the subject "gardener" is singular, but "are" is plural, which was attracted by the plural noun object phrase "which flowers" that appear just before the verb due to WH-movement.

Object attraction also appears in SOV constructions in Dutch, where agreement attraction occurs between the verb and the local object noun. [4]

"John gave his pencil to the teacher" - "his" refers to "John" as it is a possessive marker [5]

There can be a lot of confusion caused by words that are grammatically plural but conceptually singular such as "scissors", but also those that are grammatically and conceptually plural such as "suds", as well as words that are grammatically singular but can be conceptually plural such as "army". [6]

Case attraction

Case attraction is the process by which a relative pronoun takes on (is "attracted to") the case of its antecedent rather than having the case appropriate to its function in the relative clause. For example, in the following English sentence, the relative pronoun has the appropriate case, the accusative:

This is the boss of the man whom I met yesterday. [7]

The following erroneous sentence, on the other hand, has case attraction:

This is the boss of the man whose I met yesterday.

Because the antecedent, "[of] the man", is possessive, the relative pronoun has become possessive as well. Attraction is a theoretical process in Standard English, but it is common in the Greek of the Septuagint and also occurs in the New Testament.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

Grammatical case is a linguistics term regarding a manner of categorizing nouns, pronouns, adjectives, participles, and numerals according to their traditionally corresponding syntactical functions within a given phrase, clause, or sentence. In some languages, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, determiners, participles, prepositions, numerals, articles and their modifiers take different inflected forms, depending on their case. As a language evolves, cases can merge, a phenomenon formally called syncretism.

In linguistics and grammar, a pronoun is a word or a group of words that substitutes a noun or noun phrase.

In linguistics, grammatical number is a grammatical category of nouns, pronouns, adjectives and verb agreement that expresses count distinctions. English and other languages present number categories of singular or plural, both of which are cited by using the hash sign (#) or by the numero signs "No." and "Nos." respectively. Some languages also have a dual, trial and paucal number or other arrangements.

English grammar Grammar of the English language

English grammar is the way in which meanings are encoded into wordings in the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and whole texts.

The Finnish language is spoken by the majority of the population in Finland and by ethnic Finns elsewhere. Unlike the languages spoken in neighbouring countries, such as Swedish and Norwegian, which are North Germanic languages, or Russian, which is a Slavic language, Finnish is a Uralic language of the Finnic languages group. Typologically, Finnish is agglutinative. As other Uralic languages, Finnish has vowel harmony, and like other Finnic languages, it has consonant gradation.

Animacy is a grammatical and semantic feature, existing in some languages, expressing how sentient or alive the referent of a noun is. Widely expressed, animacy is one of the most elementary principles in languages around the globe and is a distinction acquired as early as six months of age.

<i>Who</i> (pronoun) English pronoun

The pronoun who, in English, is an interrogative pronoun and a relative pronoun, used primarily to refer to persons.

A relative clause is typically a clause that modifies a noun or noun phrase, and uses some grammatical device to indicate that one of the arguments within the relative clause has the same referent as that noun or noun phrase. For example, in the sentence I met a man who wasn't there, the subordinate clause who wasn't there is a relative clause, since it modifies the noun man, and uses the pronoun who to indicate that the same "man" is referred to within the subordinate clause.

English personal pronouns Closed lexical category of the English language

The Englishpersonal pronouns are a subset of English pronouns taking various forms according to number, person, case and natural gender. Modern English has very little inflection of nouns or adjectives, to the point where some authors describe it as an analytic language, but the Modern English system of personal pronouns has preserved some of the inflectional complexity of Old English and Middle English.

Standard Romanian shares largely the same grammar and most of the vocabulary and phonological processes with the other three surviving varieties of Balkan Romance, namely Aromanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Istro-Romanian.

Agreement or concord happens when a word changes form depending on the other words to which it relates. It is an instance of inflection, and usually involves making the value of some grammatical category "agree" between varied words or parts of the sentence.

Personal pronouns are pronouns that are associated primarily with a particular grammatical person – first person, second person, or third person. Personal pronouns may also take different forms depending on number, grammatical or natural gender, case, and formality. The term "personal" is used here purely to signify the grammatical sense; personal pronouns are not limited to people and can also refer to animals and objects.

Hindustani, the lingua franca of Northern India and Pakistan, has two standardised registers: Hindi and Urdu. Grammatical differences between the two standards are minor but each uses its own script: Hindi uses Devanagari while Urdu uses an extended form of the Perso-Arabic script, typically in the Nastaʿlīq style.

This article describes the grammar of Tigrinya, a South Semitic language which is spoken primarily in Eritrea and Ethiopia, and is written in Ge'ez script.

English pronouns Category of words in English that prototypically "stand in" for other noun phrases

The English pronouns form a relatively small category of words in Modern English whose primary semantic function is that of a pro-form for a noun phrase. Traditional grammars consider them to be a distinct category, while most modern grammars see them as a subcategory of noun, along with common and proper nouns.[p. 22] Still others see them as a subcategory of determiner. In this article, they are treated as a subtype of the noun category.


The grammar of the Marathi language shares similarities with other modern Indo-Aryan languages such as Odia, Gujarati or Punjabi. Jain Acharya Hemachandra is the grammarian of Maharashtri Prakrit. The first modern book exclusively on Marathi Grammar was printed in 1805 by Willam Carey.

Iraqw language

Iraqw is a Cushitic language spoken in Tanzania in the Arusha and Manyara Regions. It is expanding in numbers as the Iraqw people absorb neighbouring ethnic groups. The language has many Datooga loanwords, especially in poetic language. The Gorowa language to the south shares numerous similarities and is sometimes considered a dialect.

Zero-marking in English is the indication of a particular grammatical function by the absence of any morpheme. The most common types of zero-marking in English involve zero articles, zero relative pronouns, and zero subordinating conjunctions. Examples are I like cats in which the absence of the definite article, the, signals cats to be an indefinite reference, whose specific identity is not known to the listener; that's the cat I saw in which the relative clause (that) I saw omits the implied relative pronoun, that, which would otherwise be the object of the clause's verb; and I wish you were here. in which the dependent clause, (that) you were here, omits the subordinating conjunction, that.

This article deals with the grammar of the Udmurt language.

English possessive Possessive words and phrases in the English language

In English, possessive words or phrases exist for nouns and most pronouns, as well as some noun phrases. These can play the roles of determiners or of nouns.

References

  1. ↑ Franck, Julie (November 2011). "Reaching agreement as a core syntactic process: Commentary of Bock & Middleton Reaching Agreement". Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 29 (4): 1071–1086. doi:10.1007/s11049-011-9153-1. JSTOR   41475316. S2CID   58911334.
  2. ↑ Labov, William (December 1972). "Negative Attraction and Negative Concord in English Grammar". Language. 48 (4): 773–818. doi:10.2307/411989. JSTOR   411989.
  3. 1 2 3 Bock, Kathryn (April 1995). "Producing Agreement". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 4 (2): 56–61. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10771165. JSTOR   20182327. S2CID   18002143.
  4. 1 2 Dillon, Brian; Staub, Adrian; Levy, Joshua; Clifton, Charles (2017). "Which noun phrases is the verb supposed to agree with?: Object agreement in American English". Language. 93 (1): 65–96. doi:10.1353/lan.2017.0003. S2CID   151963486.
  5. ↑ Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos (July 2012). "Agreement, attraction and architectural opportunism". Journal of Linguistics. 48 (2): 257–295. doi:10.1017/S0022226712000084. JSTOR   41502431. ProQuest   1019244248.
  6. ↑ Bock, Kathryn; Eberhard, Kathleen M.; Cutting, J.Cooper; Meyer, Antje S.; Schriefers, Herbert (September 2001). "Some Attractions of Verb Agreement". Cognitive Psychology. 43 (2): 83–128. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.462.2372 . doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0753. PMID   11527432. S2CID   26038674.
  7. ↑ Wagers, Matthew W.; Lau, Ellen F.; Phillips, Colin (August 2009). "Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes". Journal of Memory and Language. 61 (2): 206–237. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.525.8649 . doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002.


Linguistics stub.svg

This grammar-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.