Ban Non Wat

Last updated
Ban Non Wat
Excavation at Ban Non wat.jpg
Excavation at Ban Non wat
Thailand location relief map.svg
Archaeological site icon (red).svg
Location in Thailand
Location Non Sung district, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
Coordinates 15°16′28″N102°16′08″E / 15.27444°N 102.26889°E / 15.27444; 102.26889
Type Human settlement
History
Periods Neolithic
Site notes
Archaeologists Charles Higham

Ban Non Wat is a village in Thailand, in the Non Sung district, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, located near the small city of Phimai. It has been the subject of excavation since 2002. The cultural sequence encompasses 11 prehistoric phases, which include 640 burials. [1] The site is associated with consistent occupation, and in modern-day Ban Non Wat the occupied village is located closer to the Mun River. [2]

Contents

Excavations show that people were occupying the region during the Neolithic, Bronze, and Iron Ages. [3] This unique sequence has been proven by 76 radiocarbon determinations treated with Bayesian analyses. [1] [4] Bayesian analysis is the use of Bayesian statistics to calibrate radiocarbon dates to receive a more accurate date. [5] Soil in the Ban Non Wat area may displace the Bayesian analysis. [2] These reveal that the initial Neolithic settlement took place in the 17th century BC, while the Bronze Age began in the late 11th century BC. The transition into the Iron Age took place in about 420 BC. [1]

Because of disagreements about the dating and environment surrounding Ban Non Wat, questions concerning the meanings of artifacts from the digs have been raised by Doctor Joyce White. She argues that precautions weren't taken during the process of collecting dates for the site, so results of dating aren't trustworthy. [2]

The excavations have been run by Charles Higham, and now by Dr. Nigel Chang and are partially funded by the Earthwatch institute. They are considered by some to be amongst the richest archaeological digs under current excavation.

Neolithic

The Neolithic phase at Ban Non Wat has evidence of human occupation but no evidence of metallurgy. [6] The Neolithic period is divided into an early and late phase. The earliest burials are a series of flexed burials thought to represent hunter-gatherers. These were partially contemporary with the initial Neolithic settlement by rice farmers who also raised pigs, hunted a wide range of animals, fished and collected shellfish. [1] [7] This was followed by a late Neolithic. Late Neolithic burials were often accompanied with ceramic vessels that are simply decorated with minimal grave goods. [6] In addition to ceramic vessels, stone adzes, shells, and animal remains have been found in Neolithic burials at Ban Non Wat. [8]

In 2022 the domestication of chicken was reassessed by researchers at the University of Exeter, the University of Oxford and Cardiff University. Chicken remains found in more than 600 sites in 89 countries were examined during the research project. The remains of 23 of what were thought to be the earliest chickens found in western Eurasia and north-west Africa were subjected to radiocarbon dating. Dr Julia Best, from Cardiff University, said, “This is the first time that radiocarbon dating has been used on this scale to determine the significance of chickens in early societies. Our results demonstrate the need to directly date proposed early specimens, as this allows us the clearest picture yet of our early interactions with chickens.” The oldest bones of a known domestic chicken were from Ban Non Wat, dating to between 1650BC and 1250BC. [9] [10]

Bronze Age

Burial from Ban Non Wat Bannonwat all9.jpg
Burial from Ban Non Wat

The discovery of remarkably wealthy early Bronze Age burials illustrates profound cultural changes with the advent of copper base metallurgy. The Bronze Age at Ban Non Wat has been divided into five phases. Phase 1 occurred from 1050 to 1000 BC and consists of seven burials. [6] Shell bracelets and necklaces as well as a copper based axe are examples of some grave goods found in Phase 1 burials. There is a dramatic increase in the amount grave goods found in burials compared to the Neolithic as personal ornamentation became a more common practice. [6] Wrapping bodies and placing them in wooden coffins was a common practice in the Bronze Age, however there is more variability in burial contexts in the late Bronze and early Iron Ages. [7]

Phase 2 occurred from 1000 to 850 BC. [11] Phase 2 burials display more wealth in their grave goods. Copper-based axes, anklets, rings, as well as shell bead necklaces, belts, and earrings are some examples of grave goods found at Phase 2 burials. [12] Phase 2 contained a wider variety of grave goods when compared to other mortuary phases. [13]

Phase 3 occurred from 850 to 800 BC. [11] Phase 3 burials continue the practice of wealthy burials with many grave goods and contain many of the same items from Phase 1 and 2 burials. Phase 3 burials are unique because they are facing the North-East or South-West [12] whereas other Bronze Age burials at Ban Non Wat are mostly buried facing the North or South. Phase 3 is the last phase with wealthy burials.

Phase 4 occurred from 800 to 700 BC. [11] There are 162 burials found in Ban Non Wat dating to Phase 4. [14] It is at this time that the people of Ban Non Wat are being buried into specific groupings however there is no data supporting what these groups represent. [14] Phase 4 also marks the dramatic decrease in grave goods as previously seen in Phases 1–3. [14]

Phase 5 occurred from 700 to 420 BC. [11] There is no clear date for the end of the Bronze Age and the beginning of the Iron Age at Ban Non Wat. Many of the burials for this phase rely on the presence of bronze grave goods instead of iron as well as the law of superposition. [12] Phase 5 continues the practice of decreased grave goods as seen in Phase 4.

Dog burial from Ban Non Wat Dog burial from Ban Non Wat.jpg
Dog burial from Ban Non Wat

One example of a unique burial at Ban Non Wat comes in the form of a dog burial that was found with two bowls, believed by archaeologists to be for food and water. [15]

Iron Age

With the Iron Age, a new range of exotic ornaments accompanied the dead, including carnelian, agate, and glass. Later in the Iron Age, the site was surrounded by banks and two moats, which involved the reticulation of water from the adjacent river round the site. The rice fields surrounding the village, although yet to be exhaustively studied, are thought to have been irrigated thousands of years ago, and preliminary dating has supported this theory. [6] In contrast with the Bronze Age, the Iron Age provided significantly fewer burial goods. [7] [2]

Burials during the Iron Age at Ban Non Wat are divided into two phases. Phase 1 Iron Age burials contents are very similar to Phase 5 Bronze Age burials grave goods, with the presence of Iron goods often being the only distinguishing factor between the two. [12] Phase 2 Iron Age burials are often noted by the presence of Phimai Black pottery in addition to iron works and exotic goods. [12] However the amount of grave goods is still dramatically reduced compared to some Bronze Age burials.

Many of the artifacts recovered have suggested an ongoing link with the Khmer culture, unsurprising given the site's proximity to one end of the Ancient Khmer Highway, at the Phimai Historical Park.

Evidence for metal working

While excavations at Ban Non Wat are primarily about burials, recent excavations show that the residents of Ban Non Wat were likely producing their own metalworks. Archaeologists were able to uncover about a dozen working floors dating to the Iron Age. [16] These floors were made of baked clay varying in color and texture. In addition to the floors, artifacts associated with metal working such as crucibles and bronze and iron fragments were also found at the site. [16]

Complications

The site of Ban Non Wat has accrued significant questioning that concerns several results including the Bayesian analysis, [2] as well as the significance of the burial goods and their meanings. [2] There is also argument on the importance of the bronze grave goods found in the burials; due to the fact that the introduction of metal had a significantly different social construct when compared to other cultures. [17] [18] Additionally, the soil in the area has a higher acidity due to the environment which can interfere with both digs and scientific analysis. [7] [17] [5]

There is some conversation concerning the occupation of Ban Non Wat. The site has been continuously occupied since the Bronze Age, during the neolithic age the site could have been less densely populated and used as a seasonal occupation site until the Bronze Age. [4] [17] [2]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bronze Age</span> Historical period (c. 3300–1200 BC)

The Bronze Age is a historic period, lasting approximately from 3300 BC to 1200 BC, characterized by the use of bronze, the presence of writing in some areas, and other early features of urban civilization. The Bronze Age is the second principal period of the three-age system proposed in 1836 by Christian Jürgensen Thomsen for classifying and studying ancient societies and history. It is also considered the second phase, of three, in the Metal Ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ban Chiang</span> Archaeological site in north-east Thailand

Ban Chiang is an archaeological site in Nong Han district, Udon Thani province, Thailand. It has been a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1992. Discovered in 1966, the site first attracted interest due to its ancient red-painted pottery. More recently, it gained international attention in 2008 when the United States Department of Justice, following an undercover investigation begun in 2003, raided several museums for their role in trafficking in Ban Chiang antiquities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plain of Jars</span> Megalithic archaeological landscape in Laos

The Plain of Jars is a megalithic archaeological landscape in Laos. It consists of thousands of stone jars scattered around the upland valleys and the lower foothills of the central plain of the Xiangkhoang Plateau. The jars are arranged in clusters ranging in number from one to several hundred.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phimai</span>

Phimai is a township in Nakhon Ratchasima Province in northeast Thailand. As of 2005 the town had a population of 9,768. The town is the administrative center of the Phimai District.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grave goods</span> Items buried along with the body

Grave goods, in archaeology and anthropology, are items buried along with a body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric Wales</span> History of Wales 230,000 years ago to AD 48

Prehistoric Wales in terms of human settlements covers the period from about 230,000 years ago, the date attributed to the earliest human remains found in what is now Wales, to the year AD 48 when the Roman army began a military campaign against one of the Welsh tribes. Traditionally, historians have believed that successive waves of immigrants brought different cultures into the area, largely replacing the previous inhabitants, with the last wave of immigrants being the Celts. However, studies of population genetics now suggest that this may not be true, and that immigration was on a smaller scale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Higham (archaeologist)</span> British-born New Zealand archaeologist

Charles Franklin Wandesforde Higham is a British-born New Zealand archaeologist most noted for his work in Southeast Asia. Among his noted contributions to archaeology are his work about the Angkor civilization in Cambodia, and his current work in Northeast Thailand. He is an emeritus professor at the University of Otago in Dunedin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric Thailand</span>

Prehistoric Thailand may be traced back as far as 1,000,000 years ago from the fossils and stone tools found in northern and western Thailand. At an archaeological site in Lampang, northern Thailand Homo erectus fossils, Lampang Man, dating back 1,000,000 – 500,000 years, have been discovered. Stone tools have been widely found in Kanchanaburi, Ubon Ratchathani, Nakhon Si Thammarat, and Lopburi. Prehistoric cave paintings have also been found in these regions, dating back 10,000 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bronze Age Britain</span> Period of British history from c. 2500 until c. 800 BC

Bronze Age Britain is an era of British history that spanned from c. 2500–2000 BC until c. 800 BC. Lasting for approximately 1,700 years, it was preceded by the era of Neolithic Britain and was in turn followed by the period of Iron Age Britain. Being categorised as the Bronze Age, it was marked by the use of copper and then bronze by the prehistoric Britons, who used such metals to fashion tools. Great Britain in the Bronze Age also saw the widespread adoption of agriculture.

Làng Cả is an archaeological site in the Red River Delta in northern Vietnam. Excavations there yielded a number of coffins containing relics of the Bronze Age Dong Son culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gesher (archaeological site)</span> Archaeological site in Israel

Gesher is an archaeological site located on the southern bank of Nahal Tavor, near kibbutz Gesher in the central Jordan Valley of Israel. It bears signs of occupation from two periods, the very early Neolithic and the Middle Bronze Age. The site was first excavated between 1986 and 1987 by Yosef Garfinkel of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and between 2002 and 2004 by Susan Cohen of Montana State University. The average of 4 radiocarbon dating results suggested inhabitation of the settlement around 8000 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seima-Turbino phenomenon</span>

The Seima-Turbino phenomenon is a pattern of burial sites with similar bronze artifacts dated to c. 2300–1700 BCE found across northern Eurasia, particularly Siberia and Central Asia, maybe from Fennoscandia to Mongolia, Northeast China, Russian Far East, Korea, and Japan. The homeland is considered to be the Altai Mountains. These findings have suggested a common point of cultural origin, possession of advanced metal working technology, and unexplained rapid migration. The buried were nomadic warriors and metal-workers, traveling on horseback or two-wheeled carts.

Samrong Sen on the east bank of the Stueng Chinit River is a prehistoric archaeological site in the Kampong Chhnang Province, Cambodia. Consisting of a very large fluviatile shell midden, it flourished in particular from 1500 BC to 500 BC.

Part of series of articles upon Archaeology of Kosovo

Phum Snay is an Iron Age archaeological site discovered in May 2000 in Preah Neat Prey District, Banteay Meanchey Province, Northwest Cambodia, around 80 km (50 mi) from the temple ruins of Angkor. The site was excavated between 2001 and 2003 by primary excavators Dougald O’Reilly of the Australian National University, Pheng Sitha and Thuy Chanthourn. The excavation was intended to discover more about Iron Age life in Cambodia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ban Kao</span> Tambon in Thailand

Ban Kao is a tambon (sub-district) of Mueang Kanchanaburi District, in Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand. In 2017, it had a population of 16,147 people. The tambon contains 15 villages. This network of villages had its origins in northern China and this is reinforced by pottery and ceramic fragments. The pottery and ceramic fragments found at Ban Kao highlight it's archaeological significance in Southeast Asia; some of these fragments are currently being kept at the Ban Kao National Museum.

The Zvejnieki burial ground is an archaeological site consisting of a large Stone Age cemetery with over 400 burials and associated grave goods. It is located along a drumlin on the northern shore of Lake Burtnieks in northern Latvia.

Lovea is a modern village and archaeological site located in the Puok district of Siem Reap province, Cambodia. Lovea's circular mound measures 210 metres (690 ft) north–south and 312 metres (1,024 ft) east-west and is notable for its two circular embankments or moats that surround the mound, an unusual habitation pattern in this part of Cambodia. The site was first identified and described by French archaeologist Louis Malleret in the 1950s. More recent archaeological excavations have identified burials and residential occupation. The site dates from the second century BCE through the Angkor period to the present day.

Prei Khmeng, or Prei Khmeng village, is an archaeological site located in Siem Reap province, Cambodia. Occupation of Prei Khmeng began during the Iron Age and continued through the 11th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nyaung-gan</span>

Nyaung-gan is a Bronze Age cemetery in central Myanmar, and was the first site in Myanmar to have artefacts dating to the Bronze Age. Burials found over two seasons (1998–1999) were found to have grave goods consisting of pottery filled with animal bones, beads, spear points, terracotta and jewelry, no iron was found at the site and that provides a good benchmark to start with dating of the site. The site was initially thought to be a significant site due to surface findings, so a team was assembled to investigate the validity of that claim. Myanmar is centrally located along trade routes that connect South, East, and Southeast Asia, and has great potential to show cultural influence from all stops along those trade routes. Another unique aspect of the site is that the skeletons found in the burials were left in situ, and a museum was constructed around them.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Higham, C. F. W. (2011). The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia: New insight on social change from Ban Non Wat. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 21(3), 365-389.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 White, Joyce (October 2015). "Comment on 'Debating a great site: Ban Non Wat and the wider prehistory of Southeast Asia'". Antiquity. 89 (347): 1230–1232. doi:10.15184/aqy.2015.109. ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   163037505.
  3. ↑ Harris, N.J.; Tayles, N. (June 2012). "Burial containers – A hidden aspect of mortuary practices: Archaeothanatology at Ban Non Wat, Thailand". Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 31 (2): 227–239. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2012.01.001. ISSN   0278-4165.
  4. 1 2 Higham, Charles; Higham, Thomas (2009-03-01). "A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat". Antiquity. 83 (319): 125–144. doi: 10.1017/s0003598x00098136 . ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   162486392.
  5. 1 2 Otárola-Castillo, Erik; Torquato, Melissa G. (2018-10-21). "Bayesian Statistics in Archaeology". Annual Review of Anthropology. 47 (1): 435–453. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045834. ISSN   0084-6570. S2CID   149644804.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Higham, Charles (2011). "The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia: New Insight on Social Change from Ban Non Wat". Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 21 (3): 365–389. doi:10.1017/S0959774311000424. ISSN   0959-7743. S2CID   162729367.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Harris, N.J.; Tayles, N. (2012). "Burial containers – A hidden aspect of mortuary practices: Archaeothanatology at Ban Non Wat, Thailand". Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 31 (2): 227–239. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2012.01.001.
  8. ↑ The excavation of Ban Non Wat. Part II, The neolithic occupation. C. F. W. Higham, A. Kijngam. Bangkok, Thailand. 2011. ISBN   978-1-78297-792-6. OCLC   884585671.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  9. ↑ Horton, Helena (6 June 2022). "Chickens were first tempted down from trees by rice, research suggests". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2022.
  10. ↑ "New evidence about when, where, and how chickens were domesticated". phys.org. 6 June 2022. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2022.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Higham, Charles (2011). "The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia: New Insight on Social Change from Ban Non Wat". Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 21 (3): 365–389. doi:10.1017/S0959774311000424. ISSN   1474-0540. S2CID   162729367.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Higham, Charles; Higham, Thomas (2009). "A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat". Antiquity. 83 (319): 125–144. doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00098136 . ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   162486392.
  13. ↑ White, Joyce C. (2013-09-01). "Ban non Wat: New light on the Metal Ages of Southeast Asia - C.F.W Higham & A. Kijngam (Ed.). Origins of the civilization of Angkor, volume 4. The excavation of Ban non Wat: Part 2: The Neolithic occupation. Xiv+223 pages, 257 colour and b&w illustrations, 40 tables. 2010. Bangkok: Thai Fine Arts Department; 978-974-417-389-8 hardback £ 50. - C.F.W Higham & A. Kijngam (Ed.). Origins of the civilization of Angkor, volume 5. The excavation of Ban non Wat: Part 3: The Bronze Age. Xxiv+598 pages, 665 colour and b&w illustrations, 46 tables. 2012. Bangkok: Thai Fine Arts Department; 978-974-417-627-1 hardback £ 100. - C.F.W Higham & A. Kijngam (Ed.). Origins of the civilization of Angkor, volume 6. The excavation of Ban non Wat: Part 4: The Iron Age, summary and conclusions. Xviii+403 pages, 369 colour and b&w illustrations, 36 tables. 2012. Bangkok: Thai Fine Arts Department; 978-616-283-009-9 hardback". Antiquity. 87 (337): 909–911. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00049619. ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   231656437.
  14. 1 2 3 Smith, Baylee A.; Davies, Tilman M.; Higham, Charles F. W. (2015-12-01). "Spatial and social variables in the Bronze Age Phase 4 cemetery of Ban Non Wat, Northeast Thailand". Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 4: 362–370. Bibcode:2015JArSR...4..362S. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.10.003. ISSN   2352-409X.
  15. ↑ "Bronze Age Dog Burial at Ban Non Wat". Alison in Cambodia. 2010-04-19. Retrieved 2022-03-11.
  16. 1 2 Duke, Belinda; Carter, Alison; Chang, Nigel (2010-12-22). "The Excavation of Iron Age Working Floors and Small-Scale Industry at Ban Non Wat, Thailand". Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 20. doi: 10.5334/pia.345 . ISSN   2041-9015.
  17. 1 2 3 White, Joyce C. (2013-09-01). "Ban non Wat: New light on the Metal Ages of Southeast Asia - C.F.W Higham & A. Kijngam (Ed.). Origins of the civilization of Angkor, volume 4. The excavation of Ban non Wat: Part 2: The Neolithic occupation. Xiv+223 pages, 257 colour and b&w illustrations, 40 tables. 2010. Bangkok: Thai Fine Arts Department; 978-974-417-389-8 hardback £ 50. - C.F.W Higham & A. Kijngam (Ed.). Origins of the civilization of Angkor, volume 5. The excavation of Ban non Wat: Part 3: The Bronze Age. Xxiv+598 pages, 665 colour and b&w illustrations, 46 tables. 2012. Bangkok: Thai Fine Arts Department; 978-974-417-627-1 hardback £ 100. - C.F.W Higham & A. Kijngam (Ed.). Origins of the civilization of Angkor, volume 6. The excavation of Ban non Wat: Part 4: The Iron Age, summary and conclusions. Xviii+403 pages, 369 colour and b&w illustrations, 36 tables. 2012. Bangkok: Thai Fine Arts Department; 978-616-283-009-9 hardback". Antiquity. 87 (337): 909–911. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00049619. ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   231656437.
  18. ↑ King, Charlotte L.; Tayles, Nancy; Gordon, Keith C. (September 2011). "Re-examining the chemical evaluation of diagenesis in human bone apatite". Journal of Archaeological Science. 38 (9): 2222–2230. Bibcode:2011JArSc..38.2222K. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.