Battle of Wadi (1916)

Battle of Wadi
	Part of the Mesopotamian campaign of World War I
	; A 1924 British map showing action at the Wadi
Date	13 January 1916
Location	Hanna defile, 3.5 miles (5.6 km) east of Sheikh Sa'ad, Mesopotamia, present-day Iraq
Result	British Empire tactical victory; Ottoman Empire strategic victory; (The British successfully capture the Wadi defile but suffer heavy casualties and fail in their overall objective of relieving the besieged army at Kut.)
Belligerents
British Empire India ; United Kingdom ;	Ottoman Empire ; German Empire (military commanders);
Commanders and leaders
Fenton Aylmer ; George Younghusband ; George Kemball	Colmar von der Goltz ; Halil Pasha
Strength
19,000	20,000
Casualties and losses
1,600 dead or wounded,; numerous captured	527 casualties unknown, estimated minor

Last updated June 08, 2023

The Battle of Wadi, occurring on 13 January 1916,^[2] was an unsuccessful attempt by British forces fighting in Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq) during World War I to relieve beleaguered forces under Sir Charles Townshend then under siege by the Ottoman Sixth Army at Kut-al-Amara.^[3]^[4]

Pushed by regional British Commander-in-Chief Sir John Nixon, General Fenton Aylmer launched an attack against Ottoman defensive positions on the banks of the Wadi River.^[5]^[6] The Wadi was a steep valley of a stream that ran from the north into the River Tigris, some 6 miles (9.7 km) upstream towards Kut-al-Amara from Sheikh Sa'ad.^[7] The attack is generally considered as a failure, as although Aylmer managed to capture the Wadi, it cost him 1,600 men. The British failure led to Townshend's surrender, along with 10,000 of his men, in the largest single surrender of British troops up to that time. However, the British recaptured Kut in February 1917, on their way to the capture of Baghdad sixteen days later on 11 March 1917.^[8]^[9]

Background

On 5 December 1915, Ottoman forces under the command of Halil Kut and the German commander Baron von der Goltz,^[3] surrounded an Anglo-Indian force of 25,000 men and began the Siege of Kut-Al Amara,^[4] a city 50 miles (80 km) south of Baghdad.^[2] Replying to pleas for help from Major Charles Townshend, Mesopotamian Theatre commander Sir John Nixon dispatched the British Tigris Corps of 19,000 men under Lieutenant General Sir Fenton Aylmer to relieve the besieged garrison.^[9]^[10]

The first attempt to relieve Kut (the Battle of Sheikh Sa'ad) came on 6 January 1916. Aylmer's advance force, under Major-General George Younghusband, moved forward from Ali Al-Gharbi towards Sheikh Sa'ad along both banks of the Tigris. Younghusband's column made contact with the Ottomans on the morning of 6 January, 3.5 miles (5.6 km) east of Sheikh Sa'ad. British efforts to defeat the Ottomans were unsuccessful.^[7] British casualties were heavy amounting to 4,202, including 133 officers. Following this, the Ottoman forces voluntarily abandoned their position on 9 January for an unknown reason,^[5] and retired 10 miles (16 km) upstream to the Wadi.^[4]^[11]

Preparations for the battle

Aylmer's troops were exhausted and demoralized as they continued to make their way up the Tigris toward Kut. Their progress was hampered by the region's typical shortage of available roads and supply routes.^[5] Aylmer planned to outflank the Wadi position, capture the Hanna Defile and surround the Ottoman force. The 28th Indian Brigade of the 7th (Meerut) Division under Brigadier General George Kemball would attack the Wadi trenches frontally, while the rest of the Tigris Corps moved around the flank. However, the British troops were hampered by having no accurate maps of the area, so much of the planning was left to chance.^[7]^[9]

Meanwhile, the Ottoman army, under new regional commander Halil Pasha, set up new and firmer defensive positions—with some 20,000 troops—along the banks of the smaller Wadi River, through which the British would have to pass to reach Kut.^[5]

Battle of Wadi

The attack, which began in the early afternoon of 13 January—postponed from the morning because of a persistent mist and a slow advance by artillery across the river—quickly lost the intended element of surprise, as the outnumbered British forces on both sides of enemy lines struggled to assert themselves against a robust Ottoman defense.^[5] Kemball made a frontal advance, while Younghusband, with the bulk of the British force, attempted a wide turning movement.^[11] The delay seriously affected the chances of success, as small-arms and artillery fire from the alerted Ottoman forces began to halt the British infantry movements.^[4]^[8]

Lacking proper maps, the leading British column became lost.^[10] Seizing the opportunity, the Ottoman units began to wheel around from a north–south orientation to an east–west, to face the British flanking manoeuvre. The resulting frontal attack by the 28th Brigade was repulsed with heavy casualties.^[8]^[9]

By dusk, it became clear that the attempt had failed. British troops, attempting to manoeuvre around the Ottoman flanks, failed to reach the river, and the mouth of the Hanna Defile was still strongly held by the entrenched Ottoman troops.^[8] Aylmer called off the attack by the end of the day and ferried most of his remaining troops to the right bank of the Tigris.^[10]

By this time, Aylmer's troops had gained control of the Wadi, but it was a small advance that was unworthy of the 1,600 men killed or wounded (including 40 British officers) in the attack and did little to bring relief closer to Townshend's beleaguered forces at Kut.^[5]^[11] The provision of adequate medical capacity and supplies had not improved significantly since the appalling debacle at Sheikh Sa'ad, so again many casualties suffered without treatment or evacuation for several days.^[7]

Aftermath

Colmar Freiherr von der Goltz - the victorious German commander leading the Ottoman troops Goltz-portrait.jpg — Colmar Freiherr von der Goltz – the victorious German commander leading the Ottoman troops

The British continued to attempt to break through the Ottoman lines over the coming months in order to rescue their brethren in Kut, all of which were unsuccessful. In April 1916, after nearly five months under siege, Townshend finally submitted, along with 10,000 of his men, in the largest single surrender of British troops up to that time.^[5]^[9]

Through mistreatment and neglect leading to starvation, nearly 5,000 British prisoners died before the end of the war. The Siege of Kut was an important Ottoman victory, greatly raising the morale of Ottoman soldiers and prestige for the Ottoman Army in the Middle East. The British government on the other hand was forced to pour more resources into Mesopotamia.^[6]^[10]

The British captured Kut in February 1917 on their way to the capture of Baghdad sixteen days later on 11 March 1917.^[8] The humiliation the British faced due to the loss of Kut had been partially rectified. The Ottoman government was forced to end its military operations in Persia and try to build up a new army to prevent the British from moving on to capture of Mosul.^[6]^[9]

Sepoy Chatta Singh of the 9th Bhopal Infantry was awarded the Victoria Cross for his actions at the battle.

Related Research Articles

Kūt, officially Al-Kut, also spelled Kutulamare or Kut al-Imara, is a city in eastern Iraq, on the left bank of the Tigris River, about 160 kilometres south east of Baghdad. As of 2018 the estimated population is about 389,400 people. It is the capital of the province long known as Al Kut, but since the 1960s renamed Wasit.

The siege of Kut Al Amara, also known as the first battle of Kut, was the besieging of an 8,000 strong British Army garrison in the town of Kut, 160 km (100 mi) south of Baghdad, by the Ottoman Army. In 1915, its population was around 6,500. Following the surrender of the garrison on 29 April 1916, the survivors of the siege were marched to imprisonment at Aleppo, during which many died. Historian Christopher Catherwood has called the siege "the worst defeat of the Allies in World War I". Ten months later, the British Indian Army, consisting almost entirely of newly recruited troops from Western India, conquered Kut, Baghdad and other regions in between in the Fall of Baghdad.

The 13th (Western) Division was one of the Kitchener's Army divisions in the First World War, raised from volunteers by Lord Kitchener. It fought at Gallipoli, in Mesopotamia and Persia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sir Fenton Aylmer, 13th Baronet</span>

Lieutenant-General Sir Fenton John Aylmer, 13th Baronet was an Anglo-Irish recipient of the Victoria Cross. He was in command of the first failed efforts to break the siege of Kut in 1916. From a military background, Aylmer was commissioned into the Indian Army, and immediately involved in fierce fighting on the north-west frontier. In a singularly heroic action, still in his twenties, he helped rescue Townshend's garrison at Chitral, spearheading the relief column. For his valorous conduct he was awarded the Victoria Cross, and rapid promotion through the officer class.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Ctesiphon (1915)</span> A battle in 1915 during the First World War

The Battle of Ctesiphon was fought in November 1915 by the British Empire, against the Ottoman Empire, within the Mesopotamian Campaign of World War I.

The Mesopotamian campaign was a campaign in the Middle Eastern theatre of World War I fought between the Allies represented by the British Empire, troops from Britain, Australia and the vast majority from British Raj, against the Central Powers, mostly the Ottoman Empire.

The fall of Baghdad occurred during the Mesopotamia Campaign, fought between the forces of the British Empire and the Ottoman Empire in the First World War.

The military history of Iraq, due to a rich archaeological record, is one of the longest in written human history. The region of Iraq, which used to be Mesopotamia, has been referred to as the "cradle of civilization", and wars of conquest have been recorded in this region as far back as the third millennium BC. Because of its geopolitical dominance and ideology based in world domination, the Neo-Assyrian Empire is by many researchers regarded to have been the first world empire in history. The area possesses strategic value, initially for the rich, fertile agricultural region in the Mesopotamian plain, and more recently for large petroleum deposits and access to the oil-rich Persian Gulf. The present territory of Iraq lacks significant strategic barriers, making it difficult to defend against foreign invasion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Townshend (British Army officer)</span> First World War soldier (1861–1924)

Major General Sir Charles Vere Ferrers Townshend, was a British soldier who during the First World War led an overreaching military campaign in Mesopotamia. His troops were besieged and captured at the Siege of Kut, which was possibly the worst defeat suffered by the Allies.

General Sir John Eccles Nixon was a senior commander of the British Indian Army. He gave the orders for the ultimately disastrous first British Expedition against Baghdad during the First World War.

The Battle of Dujaila was fought on 8 March 1916, between British and Ottoman forces during the First World War. The Ottoman forces, led by Colmar Freiherr von der Goltz were besieging Kut, when the Anglo-Indian relief force, led by Lieutenant-General Fenton Aylmer, attempted to relieve the city. The attempt failed, and Aylmer lost 3,500 men.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Battle of Kut</span>

The Second Battle of Kut was fought on 23 February 1917, between British and Ottoman forces at Kut, Mesopotamia.

General Sir Beauchamp Duff, was a Scottish officer with a distinguished career in the British Indian Army. He served as Commander-in-Chief of India during the First World War. His role in the disastrous expedition to Mesopotamia was criticised, helping to end a long career.

The First Battle of Hanna was a World War I battle fought on the Mesopotamian front on 21 January 1916 between Ottoman Army and Anglo-Indian forces.

The Battle of Es Sinn was a World War I military engagement between Anglo-Indian and Ottoman forces.

The Battle of Sheikh Sa'ad occurred between 6–8 January 1916 during the Mesopotamian Campaign of the First World War. The battle took place along the banks of the Tigris River between the Anglo-Indian Tigris Corps and elements of the Ottoman Sixth Army. The engagement was the first in a series of assaults by the Tigris Corps to try to break through the Ottoman lines to relieve the besieged garrison at Kut.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Amara</span>

The Battle of Amara, also known as the Second Battle of Qurna, was a military engagement between the forces of the British and Ottoman Empires during the Mesopotamian Campaign of World War I. The battle took place in the flooded marshes and islands along the Tigris river between the towns of Qurna and Amara and resulted in the British capture of Amara and rout of Ottoman forces in the area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Nasiriyah (1915)</span>

The Battle of Nasiriyah was a battle in World War I that took place in the Mesopotamian city of Nasiriyah between British and Ottoman forces in July 1915. It was a pivotal battle in the Mesopotamian campaign of World War I and saw 5,000 British and Indian troops face off against a Turkish garrison of a similar number. British and Indian forces under the command of Lieutenant General Sir George Frederick Gorringe attacked Nasiriyah with the intention of protecting the British stronghold of Basra and destroying a major Turkish supply center in the region. British forces defeated the Turkish forces in Nasiriyah and it became the latest addition to a long string of successes against Ottoman forces in the campaign, coming right after the capture of Amara and the Battle of Qurna.

The command of Charles Townshend in the Mesopotamian Campaign which led to the siege of Kut has been the object of much controversy. Townshend successfully led his "Regetta up the Tigris" to come very close to Baghdad, but was defeated. Townshend's behavior in Ottoman captivity has been especially controversial.

References

1 2 Edward J. Erickson, Ottoman Army Effectiveness in World War I: A comparative study, Routledge, 2007, ISBN 978-0-415-77099-6, p. 93.
1 2 Barber, Major Charles H (1917). Besieged in Kut – and After. Blackwood.
1 2 "Battles: The Battle of the Wadi, 1916". 27 February 2002. Retrieved 15 September 2008.
1 2 3 4 Candler, Edmund (1919). The Long Road to Baghdad. Baghdad: Cassell. pp. 311.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Battle of Wadi this day in history 1916". history.com. Archived from the original on 6 March 2009. Retrieved 15 September 2008.
1 2 3 Gilbert, Martin (2004). The First World War: A complete history. Henry Holt and Co. pp. 688. ISBN 0-8050-7617-4.
1 2 3 4 "Nixons Second Dispatch". 19141918. Archived from the original on 31 May 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2008.
1 2 3 4 5 "The long long trail". 1914-1918.net. Archived from the original on 11 August 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2008.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Esposito, Vincent Joseph (1964). A Concise History of World War I. Praeger. p. 414.
1 2 3 4 Tucker, Spencer; Priscilla Mary Roberts (2005). World War I: Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 1661. ISBN 978-1-85109-420-2.
1 2 3 Fraser, Lovat (12 January 1918). "What happened at Kut". 'The War Illustrated' – 'a Pictorial Record of the Conflict of the Nations'. Retrieved 17 September 2008.