Ben Klemens

Last updated

Ben Klemens
Ben Klemens.jpeg
Born (1975-04-10) April 10, 1975 (age 48)
Occupation(s)Economist, writer, emoji designer
Known for Software patents
Falafel emoji
Website ben.klemens.org

Ben Klemens (born April 10, 1975[ citation needed ]) is an Australian economist, author, and co-host of the podcast 'Pod, Paper, Scissors'. [1] He works for the US Treasury Department [2] and was previously a nonresident fellow at the Brookings Institution's Center on Social and Economic Dynamics. [3] He holds a PhD in Social Sciences from Caltech. [4]

Contents

Klemens is the author of the proposal to the Unicode consortium for the Falafel emoji, [5] which will be appearing across web platforms in 2019. [6] [7]

Statistical computing

In the realm of statistical computing, Klemens has done extensive work on statistical analysis for large data sets and non-traditional models such as agent-based models. He developed an innovative library of statistics functions for C, named Apophenia, [8] and has written a textbook on statistical computing, Modeling with Data. [9]

Software patent policy

Klemens has also worked on the policy aspects of computing, and in particular the issue of software patents. He has argued in a book entitled Math You Can't Use ( ISBN   0815749422) and a law review article [10] that intangibles such as computer code and mathematics should not be patentable subject matter. [11]

Klemens was previously the executive director of End Software Patents, an advocacy group that has lobbied to eliminating software patents and has organized around the Bilski v. Kappos case that was decided by the Supreme Court in 2010. [12] [13] He is a featured expert in the documentary Patent Absurdity: How Software Patents Broke the System (2010). [14] His writings on the subject have appeared in the op-ed sections of The Wall Street Journal , [15] Ars Technica, [16] [17] and The Washington Post . [18] He has occasionally commented on broader issues of technology policy and patent law. [19]

Related Research Articles

A software patent is a patent on a piece of software, such as a computer program, libraries, user interface, or algorithm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unicode Consortium</span> Nonprofit organization that coordinates the development of the Unicode Standard

The Unicode Consortium is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization incorporated and based in Mountain View, California, U.S. Its primary purpose is to maintain and publish the Unicode Standard which was developed with the intention of replacing existing character encoding schemes which are limited in size and scope, and are incompatible with multilingual environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emoji</span> Symbols often used as emotional cues in text

An emoji is a pictogram, logogram, ideogram, or smiley embedded in text and used in electronic messages and web pages. The primary function of modern emoji is to fill in emotional cues otherwise missing from typed conversation as well as to replace words as part of a logographic system. Emoji exist in various genres, including facial expressions, expressions, activity, food and drinks, celebrations, flags, objects, symbols, places, types of weather, animals and nature.

The software patent debate is the argument about the extent to which, as a matter of public policy, it should be possible to patent software and computer-implemented inventions. Policy debate on software patents has been active for years. The opponents to software patents have gained more visibility with fewer resources through the years than their pro-patent opponents. Arguments and critiques have been focused mostly on the economic consequences of software patents.

Neither software nor computer programs are explicitly mentioned in statutory United States patent law. Patent law has changed to address new technologies, and decisions of the United States Supreme Court and United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) beginning in the latter part of the 20th century have sought to clarify the boundary between patent-eligible and patent-ineligible subject matter for a number of new technologies including computers and software. The first computer software case in the Supreme Court was Gottschalk v. Benson in 1972. Since then, the Supreme Court has decided about a half dozen cases touching on the patent eligibility of software-related inventions.

State Street Bank and Trust Company v. Signature Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368, also referred to as State Street or State Street Bank, was a 1998 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning the patentability of business methods. State Street for a time established the principle that a claimed invention was eligible for protection by a patent in the United States if it involved some practical application and, in the words of the State Street opinion, "it produces a useful, concrete and tangible result."

Business method patents are a class of patents which disclose and claim new methods of doing business. This includes new types of e-commerce, insurance, banking and tax compliance etc. Business method patents are a relatively new species of patent and there have been several reviews investigating the appropriateness of patenting business methods. Nonetheless, they have become important assets for both independent inventors and major corporations.

<i>Ars Technica</i> Technology news website owned by Condé Nast

Ars Technica is a website covering news and opinions in technology, science, politics, and society, created by Ken Fisher and Jon Stokes in 1998. It publishes news, reviews, and guides on issues such as computer hardware and software, science, technology policy, and video games.

Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a process claim directed to a numerical algorithm, as such, was not patentable because "the patent would wholly pre-empt the mathematical formula and in practical effect would be a patent on the algorithm itself." That would be tantamount to allowing a patent on an abstract idea, contrary to precedent dating back to the middle of the 19th century. The ruling stated "Direct attempts to patent programs have been rejected [and] indirect attempts to obtain patents and avoid the rejection ... have confused the issue further and should not be permitted." The case was argued on October 16, 1972, and was decided November 20, 1972.

Freeman-Walter-Abele is a now outdated judicial test in United States patent law. It came from three decisions of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals—In re Freeman, 573 F.2d 1237, In re Walter, 618 F.2d 758 ; and In re Abele, 684 F.2d 902 —which attempted to comply with then-recent decisions of the Supreme Court concerning software-related patent claims.

<i>In re Bilski</i>

In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385, was an en banc decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on the patenting of method claims, particularly business methods. The court affirmed the rejection of the patent claims involving a method of hedging risks in commodities trading, as non-patentable subject matter. Most importantly, the Court concluded, that machine-or-transformation test "was proper test to apply to determine patent-eligibility of process", and that the “useful, concrete and tangible result” of State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group and AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications, Inc. should no longer be relied upon.

The Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society is a quarterly peer-reviewed law journal covering intellectual property law. It was established in 1918.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Kappos</span>

David "Dave" J. Kappos is an attorney and former government official who served as Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) from 2009 to 2013. Kappos is currently a partner at New York law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore.

Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for determining the patent eligibility of a process, but rather "a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under § 101." In so doing, the Supreme Court affirmed the rejection of an application for a patent on a method of hedging losses in one segment of the energy industry by making investments in other segments of that industry, on the basis that the abstract investment strategy set forth in the application was not patentable subject matter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poop emoji</span> Emoji representing a pile of feces

Pile of Poo (💩), also known informally as the poomoji (slang), poop emoji, or poo emoji, is an emoji resembling a coiled pile of feces, usually adorned with cartoon eyes and a large smile. Originated from Japan, it is used as an expression of various contexts. Some possible uses include: as a response of passive aggressive emotion, for comedic value, as commentary on what's bad, or as its literal meaning.

Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision related to the nature of computer code and copyright law. The dispute centered on the use of parts of the Java programming language's application programming interfaces (APIs) and about 11,000 lines of source code, which are owned by Oracle, within early versions of the Android operating system by Google. Google has since transitioned Android to a copyright-unburdened engine without the source code, and has admitted to using the APIs but claimed this was within fair use.

CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366, is a United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit case that disputed patent eligibility for the '154 patent, which describes a method and system for detecting fraud of credit card transactions through the internet. This court affirmed the decision of United States District Court for the Northern District of California which ruled that the patent is actually unpatentable.

Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014), was a 2014 United States Supreme Court decision about patent eligibility of business method patents. The issue in the case was whether certain patent claims for a computer-implemented, electronic escrow service covered abstract ideas, which would make the claims ineligible for patent protection. The patents were held to be invalid, because the claims were drawn to an abstract idea, and implementing those claims on a computer was not enough to transform that abstract idea into patentable subject matter.

Android Marshmallow is the sixth major version of the Android operating system developed by Google, being the successor to Android Lollipop. It was announced at Google I/O on May 28, 2015, and released the same day as a beta, before being officially released on September 29, 2015. It was succeeded by Android Nougat on August 22, 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eggplant emoji</span> Emoji icon

The Eggplant emoji (🍆), also known by its Unicode name of Aubergine, is an emoji featuring a purple eggplant. Social media users have noted the emoji's phallic appearance and often use it as a euphemistic or suggestive icon during sexting conversations, to represent a penis.

References

  1. Pod, Paper, Scissors https://podpaperscissors.com/ . Retrieved July 29, 2020.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. Klemens, Ryan Nunn, Laura Kawano, and Ben (February 22, 2018). "Unemployment insurance and worker mobility". Brookings. Retrieved February 8, 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. "Ben Klemens". Brookings.edu. Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  4. policies, CEP council on economic. "Contributor - Council on Economic Policies". Council on Economic Policies. Retrieved June 17, 2018.
  5. Spiro, Amy (February 6, 2019). "Falafel emoji on its way to your phone - OMG - Jerusalem Post". www.jpost.com. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  6. Klemens, Ben (April 4, 2018). "Proposal to Add Emoji Symbol for Falafel to Unicode" (PDF). Unicode.org. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
  7. Judkins, Maura (February 7, 2019). "Why does the new falafel emoji look like potatoes?". Washington Post. Retrieved February 7, 2019.
  8. "Apophenia". Free Software Directory. Free Software Foundation . Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  9. Klemens, Ben (February 17, 2008). "U.S. expanding the law – domestic and foreign – to benefit corporations". SFGate.com. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  10. Klemens, Ben (2008). "The Rise of the Information Processing Patent" (PDF). Journal of Science & Technology Law. 14 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 20, 2009. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  11. Klemens, Ben (January 14, 2006). "Math You Can't Use, Ch. 6". Groklaw. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  12. "Ben Klemens on software patents". End Soft Patents. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  13. "Bilski v. Kappos (2010, USA)". End Soft Patents. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  14. "Patent Absurdity: How Software Patents Broke the System". PatentAbsurdity.com. Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  15. Klemens, Ben (March 25, 2006). "The Gravity of the U.S. Patent Swindle". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  16. Klemens, Ben (January 10, 2019). "Software patents poised to make a comeback under new patent office rules". Ars Technica. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  17. Tashea, Jason. "Are software patents about to make a comeback? Revised guidance may do just that". ABA Journal. Retrieved February 8, 2019.
  18. Klemens, Ben (August 25, 2006). "U.S. Patent Imperialism Hurts American Interests". The Washington Post . Retrieved April 28, 2015.
  19. Palmer, Helen (July 3, 2007). "$1 million to rat out your company!". Marketplace. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved April 28, 2015.