Butterfly count

Last updated
Participants bring field guides, nets, and cameras to a butterfly count in Oregon. Butterfly Identification Rick Ahrens (7692407396).jpg
Participants bring field guides, nets, and cameras to a butterfly count in Oregon.

Butterfly counts are often carried out in North America and Europe to estimate the populations of butterflies in a specific geographical area.

Contents

A mesh net for capture specimens Butterfly net (6067594479).jpg
A mesh net for capture specimens

The counts are conducted by interested, mostly non-professional, residents of the area who maintain an interest in determining the numbers and species of butterflies in their locale. A butterfly count usually occurs at a specific time during the year and is sometimes coordinated to occur with other counts which may include a park, county, entire state or country. The results of the counts are usually shared with other interested parties including professional lepidopterists and researchers. The data gathered during a count can indicate population changes and health within a species. [1]

Sponsors

Professionals, universities, clubs, elementary and secondary schools, other educational providers, nature preserves, parks, and amateur organizations can organize a count. The participants often receive training to help them identify the butterfly species. The North American Butterfly Association organized over 400 counts in 2014. [2]

Types of butterfly counts

Capturing butterflies prior to tagging Catch To Tag Monarch Butterflys By Joody Moates.jpg
Capturing butterflies prior to tagging

There are several methods for counting butterflies currently in use, with the notable division being between restricted and open searches. Most counts are designed to count all butterflies observed in a locality.[ citation needed ] The purpose of a count is to estimate butterfly populations in a larger area from a smaller sample.

Counts may be targeted at single species and, in some cases, butterflies are observed and counted as they move from one area to another. A heavily researched example of butterfly migration is the annual migration of monarch butterflies in North America. [3] Some programs will tag butterflies to trace their migration routes, but these are migratory programs and not butterfly counts. Butterfly counts are sometimes done where there is a concentration (a roost) of a species of butterflies in an area. One example of this is the winter count of western monarch butterflies as they roost together at sites in California, northern Mexico and Arizona. [4]

Restricted searches: transects

Frequently referred to as "Pollard Transects" or "Pollard Walks" in North America, [5] a transect is a protocol designed to standardize the recording of butterfly observations, the initial format was outlined by Ernie Pollard in 1977. [6] The transect protocol involves one observer walking a fixed path at a constant pace, multiple times in a season. Butterflies are counted when they are seen within a prescribed distance from the path, often 2.5 meters on either side of the path, and only when the butterflies are seen in front of, or above, the observer (i.e., no backtracking). A second person may work with the observer to identify and/or photograph insects spotted by the observer. Transects should not change from year to year and ideally should sample a variety of habitats. [7] [8]

Examples of long-running restricted searches are Art Shapiro's Butterfly Project in the US (started in 1972), [9] and the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (started in 1976). [10]

Open searches

Open searches, also sometimes referred to as "checklist searches", are intended to focus on the presence and abundance of butterflies in a given area. They can be single events such as the North American Butterfly Association's July 1 and July 4 counts in Canada and the U.S. respectively, or they can be regular or ad hoc counts conducted by individuals or groups. The lack of formal structure makes them suitable for many citizen science programs.

In terms of the relative outcomes or the efficacy of open vs. restricted searches, studies have shown that open searches are more likely to find a greater number of species in a given area. [11] [12] Royer, et al. note that one reason for this is that during an open search, the "observer is free to search out places where butterflies typically would breed or congregate" rather than follow the fixed path of a transect. [5]

Simplified butterfly assessments

To promote broad public participation in butterfly monitoring, researcher from Austria propose to combine a simplified assessment scheme on group level executed by laypeople, with detailed assessments from butterfly experts. To evaluate their approach, they compared data collected by pupils with independent assessments of professional butterfly experts. Besides some identification uncertainties data collected by trained and supervised pupils were successfully used to predict the general habitat quality for butterflies. [13]

Opportunistic sightings

Opportunistic or incidental sightings are butterfly sightings that are not part of a formal count. Observers may note signal butterflies or multiple species. [14] An example of an opportunistic sighting is observing a butterfly in a garden and reporting it.

Atlas projects

Described as a "special type of open search", atlas projects are generally targeted at a specific geographical area such as a province or state. [14] The goal is to assess the presence or absence of species, usually over a multi-year period. Each atlas program will design its own data requirements but as they are measuring abundance and presence, they tend to accept data from transects, counts, and opportunistic sightings to build a database. The longest-running atlas program in North America is the Ontario Butterfly Atlas Online, which is supported by the Toronto Entomologists' Association and began collecting data in 1969. [15] [16]

Bait stations

Transects and open searches are not as comprehensive in tropical locations due to issues such as the density of flora and the height of the forest canopy. A counting system using bait stations with fermenting fruit has been used to assess specific populations. [17]

Quantifying observations

Participants are encouraged to employ a number of techniques to quantify large aggregations by making estimates of butterflies:

The number of butterflies can be estimated by the area size they inhabit, for example, in the overwintering population present in Mexico the population expressed in hectares. [20] Butterflies can be counted in their egg, larvae and instar number.

Tagged butterfly Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Tagged 3008px.jpg
Tagged butterfly

Butterflies are sometimes captured, tagged, and recovered. The number of tags recovered in a specific area is used to determine population size and direction of flight. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

This is an index of conservation topics. It is an alphabetical index of articles relating to conservation biology and conservation of the natural environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monarch butterfly</span> Milkweed butterfly in the family Nymphalidae

The monarch butterfly or simply monarch is a milkweed butterfly in the family Nymphalidae. Other common names, depending on region, include milkweed, common tiger, wanderer, and black-veined brown. It is amongst the most familiar of North American butterflies and an iconic pollinator, although it is not an especially effective pollinator of milkweeds. Its wings feature an easily recognizable black, orange, and white pattern, with a wingspan of 8.9–10.2 cm (3.5–4.0 in). A Müllerian mimic, the viceroy butterfly, is similar in color and pattern, but is markedly smaller and has an extra black stripe across each hindwing.

Butterfly watching is a hobby concerned with the observation and study of butterflies. It also includes the "catch and release" of butterflies. There are clubs, handbooks, checklists, and festivals devoted to the activity.

Local extinction, also extirpation, is the termination of a species in a chosen geographic area of study, though it still exists elsewhere. Local extinctions are contrasted with global extinctions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizen science</span> Scientific research conducted, in whole or in part, by amateur or nonprofessional scientists

Citizen science is scientific research conducted with participation from the general public. There are variations in the exact definition of citizen science, with different individuals and organizations having their own specific interpretations of what citizen science encompasses. Citizen science is used in a wide range of areas of study, with most citizen science research publications being in the fields of biology and conservation. There are different applications and functions of citizen science in research projects. Citizen science can be used as a methodology where public volunteers help in collecting and classifying data, improving the scientific community's capacity. Citizen science can also involve more direct involvement from the public, with communities initiating projects researching environment and health hazards in their own communities. Participation in citizen science projects also educates the public about the scientific process and increases awareness about different topics. Some schools have students participate in citizen science projects for this purpose as a part of the teaching curriculums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Butterfly gardening</span> Gardening to benefit butterflies

Butterfly gardening is a way to create, improve, and maintain habitat for lepidopterans including butterflies, skippers, and moths. Butterflies have four distinct life stages—egg, larva, chrysalis, and adult. In order to support and sustain butterfly populations, an ideal butterfly garden contains habitat for each life stage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prince Edward Point Bird Observatory</span>

The Prince Edward Point Bird Observatory is a bird observatory located in the Prince Edward Point National Wildlife Area, located on Prince Edward Point in the south-east corner of Prince Edward County, Ontario, Canada. The National Wildlife Area was established in 1978 covering 560 hectares. The observatory was established in 1995 to monitor bird migrations across the point, continuing the work of the Kingston Field Naturalists who performed similar work in the 1970s and 1980s. The observatory was designated a Globally Important Birding Area in 1998 by the Canadian Nature Federation and Bird Studies Canada. It is also an International Monarch Butterfly Reserve.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bird atlas</span>

A bird atlas is an ornithological work that attempts to provide information on the distribution, abundance, long-term change as well as seasonal patterns of bird occurrence and make extensive use of maps. They often involve a large numbers of volunteers to cover a wide geographic area and the methods used are standardized so that the studies can be continued in the future and the results remain comparable. In some cases the species covered may be restricted to those that breed or are resident. Migration atlases on the other hand cover migratory birds depict maps showing summaries of ringing and recoveries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve</span>

The Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve is a World Heritage Site containing most of the overwintering sites of the eastern population of the monarch butterfly. The reserve is located in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt pine-oak forests ecoregion on the border of Michoacán and State of Mexico, 100 km, northwest of Mexico City. Millions of butterflies arrive in the reserve annually. Butterflies only inhabit a fraction of the 56,000 hectares of the reserve from October–March. The biosphere's mission is to protect the butterfly species and its habitat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lepidoptera migration</span>

Many populations of Lepidoptera migrate, sometimes long distances, to and from areas which are only suitable for part of the year. Lepidopterans migrate on all continents except Antarctica, including from or within subtropical and tropical areas. By migrating, these species can avoid unfavorable circumstances, including weather, food shortage, or over-population. In some lepidopteran species, all individuals migrate; in others, only some migrate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reef Life Survey</span> Marine life monitoring programme based in Hobart, Tasmania

Reef Life Survey is a marine life monitoring programme based in Hobart, Tasmania. It is international in scope, but predominantly Australian, as a large proportion of the volunteers are Australian. Most of the surveys are done by volunteer recreational divers, collecting biodiversity data for marine conservation. The database is available to marine ecology researchers, and is used by several marine protected area managements in Australia, New Zealand, American Samoa and the eastern Pacific.

Lespesia archippivora is a species of tachinid fly, which, like all tachinids, are parasitoids of other arthropods. L. archippivora lives in the body of its host resulting in its death. This is not uncommon since it is estimated that about 10% of all insects are parasitoids. L. archippivora is a generalist and able to infect at least 25 lepidopteran species in addition to one species of Hymenoptera. It is common in North America and other species exist worldwide. One study suggests the species is bivoltine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monarch butterfly migration</span> Migrations, mainly across North America

Monarch butterfly migration is the phenomenon, mainly across North America, where the subspecies Danaus plexippus plexippus migrates each summer and autumn to and from overwintering sites on the West Coast of California or mountainous sites in Central Mexico. Other subspecies perform minor migrations or none at all. This massive movement of butterflies has been called "one of the most spectacular natural phenomena in the world".

The U.S. state of California has instituted numerous conservation programs, policies, laws, reserves and Habitat restoration projects throughout the state to facilitate the health and migration of the western population of the monarch butterfly. The population of western monarchs require very different breeding and overwintering habitat when compared to the eastern population of monarch butterflies. They require specific micro-climatic conditions to survive the winter and they are sensitive to habitat changes at the overwintering sites. The large aggregations of butterflies are seen as the most vulnerable at their overwintering locations along the coast. Many monarch overwintering sites are contained within the "coastal zone"; an area defined by the Coastal Zone Management Act to be 1000 yards inland from the high tide mark. Large number of overwintering sites are outside the coastal zone. There are more than 450 overwintering sites in California.

eButterfly is a real-time, online database and photo storage program. It provides a way for the butterfly community to report, organize, and access information about butterflies in Central and North America and the Caribbean. eButterfly provides detailed sources for basic data on butterfly abundance, distribution, and phenology at a variety of spatial and temporal scales across the region. eButterfly is maximizing the utility and accessibility of the vast numbers of butterfly observations, photographs, and collections made each year by recreational and professional butterfly enthusiasts. Observations can be entered directly to the eButterfly website. As of March 2021, eButterfly users have contributed over 429,000 observations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Churchville Nature Center</span>

Churchville Nature Center is a facility of the Bucks County, Pennsylvania Department of Parks and Recreation and is located in Churchville, Pennsylvania. The center focuses on environmental education, public outreach and the preservation of native wildlife through its wide range of programs, projects and surveys. The nature center offers educational programing year round through its Environmental Education and Lenape Village departments. The center features a native butterfly house and covers 55 acres of wildlife preserve.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monarch Watch</span>

Monarch Watch is a volunteer-based citizen science organization that tracks the fall migration of the monarch butterfly. It is self-described as "a nonprofit education, conservation, and research program based at the University of Kansas that focuses on the monarch butterfly, its habitat, and its spectacular fall migration."

The Biodiversity Monitoring Switzerland (BDM) is a Swiss Confederation programme for the long-term monitoring of species diversity in Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decline in insect populations</span> Ecological trend

An increasing number of scientific studies are reporting substantial declines in insect populations worldwide. Most commonly, the declines involve reductions in abundance, though in some cases entire species are going extinct. The declines are far from uniform. In some localities, there have been reports of increases in overall insect population, and some types of insects appear to be increasing in abundance across the world.

References

  1. Overall Participation (data from butterfly sampling for parasites), Altizer Lab, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, 2010, archived from the original on August 10, 2014, retrieved August 9, 2014
  2. "NABA Butterfly Counts" . Retrieved 2014-09-08.
  3. "Monarch Net Partners". Monarch Net. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
  4. "The Xerces Society » Number of Monarch butterflies overwintering in California holds steady, but still well below the 1990s". 2014-01-31. Retrieved 2014-09-08.
  5. 1 2 Royer, Ronald A.; Austin, Jane E.; Newton, Wesley E. (1998). "Checklist and "Pollard Walk" Butterfly Survey Methods on Public Lands". The American Midland Naturalist. 140 (2): 358–371. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(1998)140[0358:CAPWBS]2.0.CO;2. ISSN   0003-0031.
  6. Pollard, E. (1977). "A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies". Biological Conservation. 12 (2): 115–134. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9. ISSN   0006-3207.
  7. "Methods for recording butterfly transects". UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  8. Van Swaay, C.A.M.; Brereton, T.; Kirkland, P.; Warren, M.S. (2012). "Manual for Butterfly Monitoring" (PDF). Wageningen: De Vlinderstichting/Dutch Butterfly Conservation, Butterfly Conservation UK & Butterfly Conservation Europe. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  9. "Home Page". Art Shapiro's Butterfly Site. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
  10. "UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme". UKMBS.org. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
  11. Létourneau, Isabelle; Larrivée, Maxim; Morin, Antoine (2012). "A comparative analysis of butterfly richness detection capacity of Pollard transects and general microhabitat surveys". The Canadian Entomologist. 144 (5): 727–731. doi:10.4039/tce.2012.64. ISSN   0008-347X. S2CID   84027800.
  12. Isaac, Nick J. B.; Cruickshanks, Katie L.; Weddle, Ann M.; Marcus Rowcliffe, J.; Brereton, Tom M.; Dennis, Roger L. H.; Shuker, David M.; Thomas, Chris D. (2011). "Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations" (PDF). Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2 (6): 585–594. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00109.x . ISSN   2041-210X.
  13. Rüdisser, Johannes; Tasser, Erich; Walde, Janette; Huemer, Peter; Lechner, Kurt; Ortner, Alois; Tappeiner, Ulrike (2017-08-01). "Simplified and still meaningful: assessing butterfly habitat quality in grasslands with data collected by pupils". Journal of Insect Conservation. 21 (4): 677–688. doi: 10.1007/s10841-017-0010-3 . ISSN   1366-638X.
  14. 1 2 "Monitor Tracker". The North American Butterfly Monitoring Network. Archived from the original on 2014-12-30. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  15. "Ontario Butterfly Atlas". The North American Butterfly Monitoring Network. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  16. Jones, Colin; Layberry, Ross; Macnaughton, Alan. "Main Atlas Page". Ontario Butterfly Atlas Online. Toronto: Toronto Entomologists’ Association. Retrieved 8 January 2015.
  17. Puja Batra. "Butterfly Monitoring Protocol" (PDF). Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network. p. 3. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
  18. Barkmann, Friederike; Huemer, Peter; Tappeiner, Ulrike; Tasser, Erich; Rüdisser, Johannes (2023-01-06). "Standardized butterfly surveys: comparing transect counts and area-time counts in insect monitoring". Biodiversity and Conservation. doi: 10.1007/s10531-022-02534-2 . ISSN   1572-9710.
  19. Suggestions for Improving Observations on NABA Butterfly Counts (PDF), NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION, retrieved August 8, 2014
  20. "monarch-population-figure-2014-monarchwatch.png (1000×629)" . Retrieved 2014-09-08.
  21. "Monarch Monitoring Project". Cap May Bird Observatory. 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-12-20. Retrieved 2008-12-05.