C. R. formula

Last updated

The Sind Observer reports Gandhi's acceptance to the C. R. Formula CR Formula.JPG
The Sind Observer reports Gandhi's acceptance to the C. R. Formula

C. Rajagopalachari's formula (or C. R. formula or Rajaji formula) was a proposal formulated by Chakravarti Rajagopalachari to solve the political deadlock between the All India Muslim League and the Indian National Congress on the independence of British India. The League's position was that the Muslims and Hindus of British India were of two separate nations and henceforth the Muslims had the right to their own nation. The Congress, which had predominantly Hindu members and opposed to the idea of partitioning the Subcontinent. With the advent of the Second World War the British administration sought to divide the Indian political elite into two factions so as to make sure that the Indian independence movement does not make large progress, taking advantage of the war.

Contents

C. Rajagopalachari, a Congress leader from Madras, devised a proposal for the Congress to offer the League the predominantly Muslim region that became Pakistan based on a plebiscite of allowing the people in those regions where Muslims were in the majority. Although the formula was opposed even within the Congress party, Gandhi used it as the basis of his proposal in talks with Jinnah in 1944. However, Jinnah rejected the proposal and the talks failed and thus C.R. Formula did not come into effect.

Congress and League

The All India Muslim League was formed in 1906 to "protect the interests of Muslims" in British India and to "represent their needs and aspirations to the Government". [1] The Indian National Congress, formed in 1885, had demanded self-governance in India. [2] In 1916, the League and the Congress entered into a pact in which the League agreed to support the Congress' efforts for home rule in exchange for the Congress' support for a two electorate system [3] that would create constituencies where only Muslims could contest and vote. [4] In the elections of 1937, Congress emerged as the largest party in seven of the 11 provinces with a clear majority in five (Madras Presidency, Uttar Pradesh, Central Province, Bihar and Orissa). [5] On the whole, Congress won 716 of the 1161 seats it contested. The League secured 4.8% of the total Muslim votes (winning 25% of the seats allotted for Muslims [6] ) and did not acquire majority in any of the four Muslim predominant provinces (Punjab, Sind Province, North West Frontier Province and Bengal Presidency). [5] The League had hoped that its candidates would win the votes over the Congress in Muslim electorates, but was disappointed. [6] Since Congress had majority in Hindu majority provinces, it refused to share power with the League in those provinces. [7] The eventual disagreement led to a political tussle between the League and the Congress [8] climaxing with the League's Lahore Resolution in March 1940, calling for an independent Muslim nation carved out of British India. [9]

Second World War

In September 1939, Lord Linlithgow, the then Viceroy of India, announced that India was at war with Germany. [10] The Congress Party resigned its provincial seats in protest, stating that the viceroy's decisions had pushed India into a war not of India's making and without consulting its people or representatives. [11] Nevertheless, many Congress leaders, including Nehru had expressed moral support to the Allies cause against the Nazis. [12] Congress demanded that if Britain was fighting to protect democracy through the war, it should also establish democracy in India. [13] However, both the Viceroy and the Secretary of State for India (Leo Amery) openly disliked Indian National Congress and its leaders including Gandhi and Nehru. [12] Moreover, since the British Indian army was dominated by Muslims and Sikhs, the government in London was keen to get both these parties' support rather than appeasing Congress. [10] While Jinnah's Muslim League wanted a Muslim Pakistan, Sikhs feared that if India were divided, Punjab would come under Pakistan and hence put the Sikhs under Muslim rule. [14] Eventually the British administration concluded that no progress towards Indian statehood could be made unless Congress and the League reached an agreement. [11]

With Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, the US entered the war. Later the Japanese invasion of South East Asia in 1941 drew the war much closer to India. Congress maintained that it would support the war efforts of Britain provided India was given its freedom. [15] While the Congress demanded a unified India and that the issue of a Muslim nation be resolved after independence, the League preferred that separate dominions be created first. [16] Jinnah claimed that he wanted "Pakistan and that commodity is available not in the Congress market but in the British market". [16] Although the ruling Conservatives had taken a harsh stance on the Congress, the Labour Party and its leaders were sympathetic to its efforts. [17] The war saw an increase in support in Britain for efforts to solve the crisis between the Raj, Congress and League. It was realised that the deadlock meant that the vast resources of India was not available to the war. [18] In addition, America had been sympathetic to India's cause, which if not satisfied by the British administration would have further weakened the Allies. [19] With divided opinion within the British government, Sir Stafford Cripps was sent to India in March 1942. [20] Since Cripps was a well known Congress sympathiser who had earlier advised the Congress leaders to "stand firm as a rock" on their demands of freedom, he was seen as the best choice for negotiations. [21] Cripps' mission however failed as the Congress declared that he was assuming different stances in private and public with regard to Indian self-governance. [22] Cripps' failure

Chakravarti Rajagopalachari's role

C. Rajagopalachari during a rally in 1939 Rajaji1939.jpg
C. Rajagopalachari during a rally in 1939

Chakravarti Rajagopalachari (or Rajaji as he was commonly referred to) was a prominent Congress leader from Madras.[ citation needed ] He was a well known follower of Gandhi and was sometimes referred to as Gandhi's conscience keeper. [23] Nonetheless, he proposed that if Muslims in India wanted a partition, Congress should not oppose this. [24] Thus he was the earliest Congress leader to acknowledge that partition was inevitable. He considered that, in the then likely scenario of Japanese invasion, India would need the support of the British and hence required the Congress and the League to agree on the constitution of India with urgency. [10] In April 1942, parts of the Madras Presidency were bombed by Japanese warplanes operating from the aircraft carrier Ryūjō . Arthur Hope, the Governor of Madras advised the people to leave Madras and also moved the secretariat inland. [25] Rajaji considered this an act of the British administration forsaking the people of Madras and brought resolutions in Madras Legislature Party of the All India Congress Committee that the Congress should concede the demand of Pakistan if the League insisted on it. [26] With severe opposition to the resolutions from the Congress leadership, he resigned from the Congress as per Gandhi's advice. [27] Thus he did not participate in the Quit India movement and was not arrested with the other Congress leaders. [24] Hence he was able to devise a proposal to negotiate with the League. [28] This proposal, which was called the CR formula by the popular press [29] was to recognise the demand for Pakistan in principle and to act as a basis for talks between the League and the Congress. [30]

The proposal

Mohandas Gandhi and C. Rajagopalachari during the Gandhi-Jinnah talks at Birla House, Bombay Gandhi Rajagopalachari.jpg
Mohandas Gandhi and C. Rajagopalachari during the Gandhi-Jinnah talks at Birla House, Bombay

The CR formula entailed [31]

i. The League was to endorse the Indian demand for independence and to co-operate with the Congress in formation of Provisional Interim Government for a transitional period.
ii. At the end of the War, a commission would be appointed to demarcate the districts having a Muslim population in absolute majority and in those areas plebiscite to be conducted on all inhabitants (including the non-Muslims) on basis of adult suffrage.
iii. All parties would be allowed to express their stance on the partition and their views before the plebiscite.
iv. In the event of separation, a mutual agreement would be entered into for safeguarding essential matters such as defence, communication and commerce and for other essential services.
v. The transfer of population, if any would be absolutely on a voluntary basis.
vi. The terms of the binding will be applicable only in case of full transfer of power by Britain to Government of India.

Gandhi–Jinnah talks of 1944

Gandhi and Jinnah in Bombay, September 1944 Jinnah Gandhi.jpg
Gandhi and Jinnah in Bombay, September 1944

As the Allies saw more victories, the attitude of British administration towards Congress softened. [32] Moreover, America had been pressing Britain to meet India's demand for self-governance. [33] Although other Congress leaders were still in prison Gandhi was released on 5 May 1944. [34] [ full citation needed ] After his release Gandhi proposed talks with Jinnah on his two-nation theory and negotiating on issue of partition. [35] The CR formula acted as the basis for the negotiations. [36] Gandhi and Jinnah met in September 1944 to ease the deadlock. [28] Gandhi offered the CR formula as his proposal to Jinnah. [31] Nevertheless, Gandhi-Jinnah talks failed after two weeks of negotiations. [30]

Causes of failure of the proposal

Although the formulation supported the principle of Pakistan, it aimed to show that the provinces that Jinnah claimed as Pakistan contained large numbers of non-Muslims. [29] Jinnah had claimed provinces then regarded as Muslim majority regions (in the north-west; Sind, Baluchistan, the North-West Frontier Province and the Punjab, and in the north-east, Assam and Bengal). [37] Thus if a plebiscite was placed, Jinnah ran a risk of partitioning Punjab and Bengal. [29] Moreover, Jinnah considered that the League represented all Muslims and the adult franchise demanded by the formula was redundant. [31] Furthermore, the decision of Muslims to secede from India, according to the CR formula, would be taken not just by Muslims alone but by a plebiscite of the entire population even in the Muslim majority districts. This, according to Ayesha Jalal (a Pakistani-American sociologist and historian), might well have diluted the enthusiasm of the people of these provinces about going partition. Hence Jinnah rejected the initiative, telling his Council that it was intended to 'torpedo' the Lahore resolution; it was the 'grossest travesty', a 'ridiculous proposal', 'offering a shadow and a husk – a maimed, mutilated and moth-eaten Pakistan, and thus trying to pass off having met out Pakistan scheme and Muslim demand'. [16]

While the formula retained most of the essential services, Jinnah wanted a full partition and any relations would be dealt via treaty alone. [37] Although a failure the CR formula was seen as Congress' betrayal of the Sikhs by Akali Dal leaders like Master Tara Singh. [38] Since the formula meant vivisection of Punjab, if agreed the Sikh community would be divided. Sikhs did not hold a majority in any single district. Splitting Punjab would leave many on both sides of the dividing line. [29] The proposal had been attacked by other leaders such as V. D. Sarvarkar [39] and Syama Prasad Mookerjee of the Hindu Mahasabha and Srinivas Sastri of National Liberal Federation. [30] However, Wavell the then viceroy of India who had earlier insisted on the geographic unity of India, [32] stated that the talks based on the CR formula failed because Gandhi himself did "not really believe" in the proposal nor Jinnah was ready to "answer awkward questions" which would reveal that he had "not thought out the implications of Pakistan". [37]

Notes

  1. ↑ Singh et al. 2008, p. 29.
  2. ↑ Mishra 1987, pp. 73–75.
  3. ↑ Hardy 1972, pp. 187–188.
  4. ↑ Dudley-Jenkins 2003, p. 160.
  5. 1 2 Shakoor 2003, pp. 16–17.
  6. 1 2 Kulke & Rothermund 2004, p. 314.
  7. ↑ Kulke & Rothermund 2004, pp. 314–315.
  8. ↑ Shakoor 2003, pp. 186–189.
  9. ↑ Shakoor 2003, pp. 171–174.
  10. 1 2 3 Wolpert 1984, p. [ page needed ].
  11. 1 2 Hardy 1972, p. 230.
  12. 1 2 Kux 1993, p. 6.
  13. ↑ Chopra 2003, p. 272.
  14. ↑ Tan & Kudaisya 2000, p. 101.
  15. ↑ Mishra 1982, p. 31.
  16. 1 2 3 Jalal 1994, p. 121.
  17. ↑ Mishra 1982, p. 34.
  18. ↑ Mishra 1982, pp. 34–36.
  19. ↑ Kux 1993, p. s 6–11.
  20. ↑ Mishra 1982, p. 40.
  21. ↑ Mishra 1982, p. 41.
  22. ↑ Marrow, Felix. "The Truth About the Cripps Mission".
  23. ↑ Srinivasan 2009.
  24. 1 2 Zakaria 2001, p. 88.
  25. ↑ Jackson 2006, p. 296.
  26. ↑ Ramanathan 2008, p. 311.
  27. ↑ Sinha 2002, pp. 61–62.
  28. 1 2 Chhabra 2005, p. 167.
  29. 1 2 3 4 Tan & Kudaisya 2000, p. 108.
  30. 1 2 3 Sen 1997, p. 311.
  31. 1 2 3 Chhabra 2005, p. 168.
  32. 1 2 Zakaria 2001, p. 91.
  33. ↑ Kux 1993, pp. 6–34.
  34. ↑ Zakaria 2001, p. 92.
  35. ↑ Zakaria 2001, p. 93.
  36. ↑ Chhabra 2005, pp. 167–168.
  37. 1 2 3 Wavell's letter to Amery
  38. ↑ Tan & Kudaisya 2000, pp. 108–109.
  39. ↑ "Gandhi Jinnah Talks". 1944. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 10 December 2009.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vallabhbhai Patel</span> Indian barrister and politician (1875–1950)

Vallabhbhai Jhaverbhai Patel, commonly known as Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, was an Indian independence nationalist and barrister who served as the first Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister of India from 1947 to 1950. He was a senior leader of the Indian National Congress, who played a significant role in the country's struggle for independence and its political integration. In India and elsewhere, he was often called Sardar, meaning "Chief" in Hindi, Urdu, Bengali and Persian. He acted as the Home Minister during the political integration of India and the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian independence movement</span> Independence movement to end British rule over India

The Indian independence movement was a series of historic events with the ultimate aim of ending British rule in India also known as British Raj. It lasted until 1947.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. Rajagopalachari</span> Indian statesman and writer (1878–1972)

Chakravarti Rajagopalachari BR, popularly known as Rajaji or C.R., also known as Mootharignar Rajaji, was an Indian statesman, writer, lawyer, and independence activist. Rajagopalachari was the last Governor-General of India, as when India became a republic in 1950 the office was abolished. He was also the only Indian-born Governor-General, as all previous holders of the post were British nationals. He also served as leader of the Indian National Congress, Premier of the Madras Presidency, Governor of West Bengal, Minister for Home Affairs of the Indian Union and Chief Minister of Madras state. Rajagopalachari founded the Swatantra Party and was one of the first recipients of India's highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna. He vehemently opposed the use of nuclear weapons and was a proponent of world peace and disarmament. During his lifetime, he also acquired the nickname 'Mango of Salem'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Partition of India</span> 1947 division of British India

The Partition of India in 1947 was the change of political borders and the division of other assets that accompanied the dissolution of the British Raj in the Indian subcontinent and the creation of two independent dominions in South Asia: India and Pakistan. The Dominion of India is today the Republic of India, and the Dominion of Pakistan—which at the time comprised two regions lying on either side of India—is now the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the People's Republic of Bangladesh. The partition was outlined in the Indian Independence Act 1947. The change of political borders notably included the division of two provinces of British India, Bengal and Punjab. The majority Muslim districts in these provinces were awarded to Pakistan and the majority non-Muslim to India. The other assets that were divided included the British Indian Army, the Royal Indian Navy, the Royal Indian Air Force, the Indian Civil Service, the railways, and the central treasury. Provisions for self-governing independent Pakistan and India legally came into existence at midnight on 14 and 15 August 1947 respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">All-India Muslim League</span> Political party in British-ruled India

The All-India Muslim League (AIML) was a political party established in Dhaka in 1906 when some well-known Muslim politicians met the Viceroy of British India, Lord Minto, with the goal of securing Muslim interests on the Indian subcontinent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maulana Azad</span> Indian politician

Abul Kalam Ghulam Muhiyuddin Ahmed bin Khairuddin Al-Hussaini Azad ; 11 November 1888 – 22 February 1958) was an Indian independence activist, writer and a senior leader of the Indian National Congress. Following India's independence, he became the First Minister of Education in the Indian government. He is commonly remembered as Maulana Azad; the word Maulana is an honorific meaning 'Our Master' and he had adopted Azad (Free) as his pen name. His contribution to establishing the education foundation in India is recognised by celebrating his birthday as National Education Day across India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quit India Movement</span> Indian freedom movement against the British

The Quit India Movement was a movement launched at the Bombay session of the All India Congress Committee by Mahatma Gandhi on 8 August 1942, during World War II, demanding an end to British rule in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pakistan Movement</span> Movement to establish Pakistan, 1940–1947

The Pakistan Movement was a nationalist and political movement in the first half of the 20th century that aimed for the creation of Pakistan from the Muslim-majority areas of British India. It was connected to the perceived need for self-determination for Muslims under British rule at the time. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, a barrister and politician led this movement after the Lahore Resolution was passed by All-India Muslim League on the 23 March 1940 and Ashraf Ali Thanwi as a religious scholar supported it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radcliffe Line</span> Boundary of the Partition of India

The Radcliffe Line was the boundary demarcated between the Indian and Pakistani portions of the Punjab Province and Bengal Presidency of British India. It was named after Cyril Radcliffe, who, as the joint chairman of the two boundary commissions for the two provinces, had the ultimate responsibility to equitably divide 175,000 square miles (450,000 km2) of territory with 88 million people.

The Cripps Mission was a failed attempt in late March 1942 by the British government to secure full Indian cooperation and support for their efforts in World War II. The mission was headed by a senior minister Stafford Cripps. Cripps belonged to the left-wing Labour Party, which was traditionally sympathetic to Indian self-rule, but he was also a member of the coalition War Cabinet led by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who had long been the leader of the movement to block Indian independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian nationalism</span> Territorial nationalist movement

Indian nationalism is an instance of territorial nationalism, which is inclusive of all of the people of India, despite their diverse ethnic, linguistic and religious backgrounds. Indian nationalism can trace roots to pre-colonial India, but was fully developed during the Indian independence movement which campaigned for independence from British rule. Indian nationalism quickly rose to popularity in India through these united anti-colonial coalitions and movements. Independence movement figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru spearheaded the Indian nationalist movement. After Indian Independence, Nehru and his successors continued to campaign on Indian nationalism in face of border wars with both China and Pakistan. After the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971 and the Bangladesh Liberation War, Indian nationalism reached its post-independence peak. However by the 1980s, religious tensions reached a melting point and Indian nationalism sluggishly collapsed. Despite its decline and the rise of religious nationalism; Indian nationalism and its historic figures continue to strongly influence the politics of India and reflect an opposition to the sectarian strands of Hindu nationalism and Muslim nationalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dominion of India</span> 1947–1950 dominion in South Asia

The Dominion of India, officially the Union of India, was an independent dominion in the British Commonwealth of Nations existing between 15 August 1947 and 26 January 1950. Until its independence, India had been ruled as an informal empire by the United Kingdom. The empire, also called the British Raj and sometimes the British Indian Empire, consisted of regions, collectively called British India, that were directly administered by the British government, and regions, called the princely states, that were ruled by Indian rulers under a system of paramountcy. The Dominion of India was formalised by the passage of the Indian Independence Act 1947, which also formalised an independent Dominion of Pakistan—comprising the regions of British India that are today Pakistan and Bangladesh. The Dominion of India remained "India" in common parlance but was geographically reduced. Under the Act, the British government relinquished all responsibility for administering its former territories. The government also revoked its treaty rights with the rulers of the princely states and advised them to join in a political union with India or Pakistan. Accordingly, the British monarch's regnal title, "Emperor of India," was abandoned.

The National Unionist Party was a political party based in the Punjab Province during the period of British rule in India. The Unionist Party mainly represented the interests of the landed gentry and landlords of Punjab, which included Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs. The Unionists dominated the political scene in Punjab from World War I to the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947. The party's leaders served as Prime Minister of the Punjab.

A Cabinet Mission went to India on 24 March 1946 to discuss the transfer of power from the British government to the Indian political leadership with the aim of preserving India's unity and granting its independence. Formed at the initiative of British Prime Minister Clement Attlee, the mission contained as its members, Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A. V. Alexander. The Viceroy of India Lord Wavell participated in some of the discussions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the British Raj</span>

After the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British Government took over the administration to establish the British Raj. The British Raj was the period of British Parliament rule on the Indian subcontinent between 1858 and 1947, for around 89 years of British occupation. The system of governance was instituted in 1858 when the rule of the East India Company was transferred to the Crown in the person of Queen Victoria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simla Conference</span> 1945 meeting convened to formulate the Wavellite Plan in British India

The Shimla Conference of 1945 was a meeting between the Viceroy of India, Lord Wavell and the major political leaders of British India at the Viceregal Lodge in Simla. When it was clear that British intended to leave India, they desperately needed an agreement on what should happen when they leave.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1937 Indian provincial elections</span> Provincial elections held in British India in the winter of 1936-37

Provincial elections were held in British India in the winter of 1936-37 as mandated by the Government of India Act 1935. Elections were held in eleven provinces - Madras, Central Provinces, Bihar, Orissa, the United Provinces, the Bombay Presidency, Assam, the North-West Frontier Province, Bengal, Punjab and Sind.

The August Offer was an offer made by Viceroy Linlithgow in 1940 promising the expansion of the Executive Council of the Viceroy of India to include more Indians, the establishment of an advisory war council, giving full weight to minority opinion, and the recognition of Indians' right to frame their own constitution.. In return, it was hoped that all parties and communities in India would cooperate in Britain's efforts in World War II. However this proposal was rejected by the Indian National Congress. Moreover, the minorities, especially the Muslim League, were assured that no constitutional scheme was acceptable to the government without their agreement, i.e. providing a veto power to the Muslim League. The Muslim League did not accept the offer, as it did not give a clear assurance for the establishment of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Muhammad Ali Jinnah</span> Founder and 1st Governor-General of Pakistan (1876–1948)

Muhammad Ali Jinnah was a barrister, politician and the founder of Pakistan. Jinnah served as the leader of the All-India Muslim League from 1913 until the inception of Pakistan on 14 August 1947, and then as the Dominion of Pakistan's first Governor-General until his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opposition to the Partition of India</span> Political viewpoint in South Asian politics

Opposition to the Partition of India was widespread in British India in the 20th century and it continues to remain a talking point in South Asian politics. Those who opposed it often adhered to the doctrine of composite nationalism in the Indian subcontinent. The Hindu, Christian, Anglo-Indian, Parsi and Sikh communities were largely opposed to the Partition of India, as were many Muslims.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.