C. Randy Gallistel

Last updated
Charles Ransom (Randy) Gallistel
C.R. Gallistel headshot 2014.jpg
Born (1941-05-18) May 18, 1941 (age 83)
Indianapolis
NationalityAmerican
Alma materStanford University, Yale University
Occupation(s)Neuroscientist, Psychologist

Charles Ransom Gallistel (born May 18, 1941) is an Emeritus Professor of Psychology at Rutgers University. He is an expert in the cognitive processes of learning and memory, using animal models to carry out research on these topics. Gallistel is married to fellow psychologist Rochel Gelman. Prior to joining the Rutgers faculty he held positions at the University of Pennsylvania, where he was chair of the psychology department and Bernard L. & Ida E. Grossman Term Professor, and at the University of California, Los Angeles. [1] [2]

Contents

Academic career

Gallistel obtained his BA in psychology from Stanford University in 1963 and his PhD in physiological psychology from Yale University in 1966. He joined the faculty of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania in 1966, where he became full professor in 1976. He moved to UCLA with his wife, Rochel Gelman, in 1989. They moved to Rutgers University, the State University of New Jersey in New Brunswick, NJ in 2000, where they became co-directors of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. Gallistel was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2001 and to the National Academy of Sciences (USA) in 2002.

Research

Gallistel has made experimental and theoretical contributions to several areas of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience: 1) The nature and development of the representation of numerosity in young children, in collaboration with his wife, Rochel Gelman. [3] 2) The psychophysical analysis of the neural substrate for electrical self-stimulation of the brain. [4] 3) The theory of action and its close relation to the theory of motivation. [5] 4) The theory of learning. [6] 5) What it means to say that brains represent the experienced world. [7] 6) The brain's representation of the abstract variables central to conceptions of space (distance & direction), time (duration and phase), numerosity, rate (number/duration) and probability (subset numerosity/set numerosity). [8] 7) The nature of the engram, the physical realization of memory in brains. [9]

Gallistel is an advocate of the computational theory of mind, and as such he criticized the view of memory as an alteration of synaptic connections (a view that is related to Associationism). His critique, in particular, focuses on how the Associationist theory of mind allegedly cannot explain how the brain encodes quantitative data such as distances, directions, and temporal durations. Gallistel rather argues that such memories could be collected inside the neurons, at the molecular level, and to support his claim he remarks the considerable capacity of polynucleotides for storing information. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

Books

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive science</span> Interdisciplinary scientific study of cognitive processes

Cognitive science is the interdisciplinary, scientific study of the mind and its processes. It examines the nature, the tasks, and the functions of cognition. Mental faculties of concern to cognitive scientists include language, perception, memory, attention, reasoning, and emotion; to understand these faculties, cognitive scientists borrow from fields such as linguistics, psychology, artificial intelligence, philosophy, neuroscience, and anthropology. The typical analysis of cognitive science spans many levels of organization, from learning and decision-making to logic and planning; from neural circuitry to modular brain organization. One of the fundamental concepts of cognitive science is that "thinking can best be understood in terms of representational structures in the mind and computational procedures that operate on those structures."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive neuroscience</span> Scientific field

Cognitive neuroscience is the scientific field that is concerned with the study of the biological processes and aspects that underlie cognition, with a specific focus on the neural connections in the brain which are involved in mental processes. It addresses the questions of how cognitive activities are affected or controlled by neural circuits in the brain. Cognitive neuroscience is a branch of both neuroscience and psychology, overlapping with disciplines such as behavioral neuroscience, cognitive psychology, physiological psychology and affective neuroscience. Cognitive neuroscience relies upon theories in cognitive science coupled with evidence from neurobiology, and computational modeling.

Artificial consciousness, also known as machine consciousness, synthetic consciousness, or digital consciousness, is the consciousness hypothesized to be possible in artificial intelligence. It is also the corresponding field of study, which draws insights from philosophy of mind, philosophy of artificial intelligence, cognitive science and neuroscience.

Computational neuroscience is a branch of neuroscience which employs mathematics, computer science, theoretical analysis and abstractions of the brain to understand the principles that govern the development, structure, physiology and cognitive abilities of the nervous system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ACT-R</span>

ACT-R is a cognitive architecture mainly developed by John Robert Anderson and Christian Lebiere at Carnegie Mellon University. Like any cognitive architecture, ACT-R aims to define the basic and irreducible cognitive and perceptual operations that enable the human mind. In theory, each task that humans can perform should consist of a series of these discrete operations.

The cognitive revolution was an intellectual movement that began in the 1950s as an interdisciplinary study of the mind and its processes, from which emerged a new field known as cognitive science. The preexisting relevant fields were psychology, linguistics, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, and philosophy. The approaches used were developed within the then-nascent fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and neuroscience. In the 1960s, the Harvard Center for Cognitive Studies and the Center for Human Information Processing at the University of California, San Diego were influential in developing the academic study of cognitive science. By the early 1970s, the cognitive movement had surpassed behaviorism as a psychological paradigm. Furthermore, by the early 1980s the cognitive approach had become the dominant line of research inquiry across most branches in the field of psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Grossberg</span> American scientist (born 1939)

Stephen Grossberg is a cognitive scientist, theoretical and computational psychologist, neuroscientist, mathematician, biomedical engineer, and neuromorphic technologist. He is the Wang Professor of Cognitive and Neural Systems and a Professor Emeritus of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering at Boston University.

John Robert Anderson is a Canadian-born American psychologist. He is currently professor of Psychology and Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University.

Creative visualization is the cognitive process of purposefully generating visual mental imagery, with eyes open or closed, simulating or recreating visual perception, in order to maintain, inspect, and transform those images, consequently modifying their associated emotions or feelings, with intent to experience a subsequent beneficial physiological, psychological, or social effect, such as expediting the healing of wounds to the body, minimizing physical pain, alleviating psychological pain including anxiety, sadness, and low mood, improving self-esteem or self-confidence, and enhancing the capacity to cope when interacting with others.

Evolutionary educational psychology is the study of the relation between inherent folk knowledge and abilities and accompanying inferential and attributional biases as these influence academic learning in evolutionarily novel cultural contexts, such as schools and the industrial workplace. The fundamental premises and principles of this discipline are presented below.

Numerical cognition is a subdiscipline of cognitive science that studies the cognitive, developmental and neural bases of numbers and mathematics. As with many cognitive science endeavors, this is a highly interdisciplinary topic, and includes researchers in cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, neuroscience and cognitive linguistics. This discipline, although it may interact with questions in the philosophy of mathematics, is primarily concerned with empirical questions.

In human developmental psychology or non-human primate experiments, ordinal numerical competence or ordinal numerical knowledge is the ability to count objects in order and to understand the greater than and less than relationships between numbers. It has been shown that children as young as two can make some ordinal numerical decisions. There are studies indicating that some non-human primates, like chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys have some ordinal numerical competence.

Rochel Gelman is an emeritus psychology professor at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Science. Gelman is married to fellow psychologist C. Randy Gallistel. Prior to joining the Rutgers faculty she taught at the University of California, Los Angeles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tomaso Poggio</span> Italian physicist and computational neuroscientist

Tomaso Armando Poggio, is the Eugene McDermott professor in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, an investigator at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research, a member of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and director of both the Center for Biological and Computational Learning at MIT and the Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines, a multi-institutional collaboration headquartered at the McGovern Institute since 2013.

Domain-general learning theories of development suggest that humans are born with mechanisms in the brain that exist to support and guide learning on a broad level, regardless of the type of information being learned. Domain-general learning theories also recognize that although learning different types of new information may be processed in the same way and in the same areas of the brain, different domains also function interdependently. Because these generalized domains work together, skills developed from one learned activity may translate into benefits with skills not yet learned. Another facet of domain-general learning theories is that knowledge within domains is cumulative, and builds under these domains over time to contribute to our greater knowledge structure. Psychologists whose theories align with domain-general framework include developmental psychologist Jean Piaget, who theorized that people develop a global knowledge structure which contains cohesive, whole knowledge internalized from experience, and psychologist Charles Spearman, whose work led to a theory on the existence of a single factor accounting for all general cognitive ability.

Common coding theory is a cognitive psychology theory describing how perceptual representations and motor representations are linked. The theory claims that there is a shared representation for both perception and action. More important, seeing an event activates the action associated with that event, and performing an action activates the associated perceptual event.

The LIDA cognitive architecture attempts to model a broad spectrum of cognition in biological systems, from low-level perception/action to high-level reasoning. Developed primarily by Stan Franklin and colleagues at the University of Memphis, the LIDA architecture is empirically grounded in cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience. It is an extension of IDA, which adds mechanisms for learning. In addition to providing hypotheses to guide further research, the architecture can support control structures for software agents and robots. Providing plausible explanations for many cognitive processes, the LIDA conceptual model is also intended as a tool with which to think about how minds work.

Mark A. Gluck is a professor of neuroscience at Rutgers–Newark in New Jersey, and director of the Rutgers Memory Disorders Project. His research focuses on the neural bases of learning and memory. He has authored Learning and Memory: From Brain to Behavior ., and co-authored Gateway to Memory: An Introduction to Neural Network Models of the Hippocampus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russell Poldrack</span>

Russell "Russ" Alan Poldrack is an American psychologist and neuroscientist. He is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, associate director of Stanford Data Science, member of the Stanford Neuroscience Institute and director of the Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience and the SDS Center for Open and Reproducible Science.

Walter Kintsch was an American psychologist and academic who was professor emeritus of Psychology at the University of Colorado Boulder. He was renowned for his groundbreaking theories in cognitive psychology, especially in relation to text comprehension.

References

  1. Haselgrove, Mark (2016). Learning: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  2. Stemmy, E. (2004). "Biography of Charles R. Gallistel". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (36): 13121–13123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405840101 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   516534 . PMID   15340141.
  3. R. Gelman et C. R. Gallistel, The Child's Understanding of Number.
  4. C. R. Gallistel, Electrical self-stimulation and its theoretical implications in Psychological Bulletin, 1964, 61, 23-34
  5. C. R. Gallistel, The organization of action: A new synthesis, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 432 pp, 1980
  6. C. R. Gallistel, P. D. Balsam, S. Fairhurst, The learning curve: Implications of a quantitative analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, R 101(36), 2004, p. 13124-13131
  7. C. R. Gallistel, Learning and Representation. In: R. Menzel (ed.), Learning. Theory and Behavior, Vol. 1 of Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, p. 141-154, Academic Press, Oxford
  8. C. R. Gallistel, 2018, Finding numbers in the brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London). Series B, 373(1740): 20170119
  9. Gallistel, C.R. The coding question., 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 498-508. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.012
  10. C. R. Gallistel, Machinery of cognition, chapitre 3, in Evolution and the Mechanisms of Decision Making. Strüngmann Forum Reports, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2003, p. 39-52
  11. C. R. Gallistel, A. P. King, Memory and the Computational Brain : Why cognitive Science will transform Neuroscience, New York: Blackwell/Wiley, 2009
  12. C.R Gallistel, 2017 The neurobiological bases for the computational theory of mind, in R. G. d. Almeida & L. Gleitman (Eds.), On Concepts, Modules, and Language New York: Oxford University Press.p. 275-296
  13. C. R. Gallistel, 2017, The coding question. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), p. 498-508
  14. C. R. Gallistel, 2017, Numbers and brains. Learning & Behavior, 45(4), p. 327-328
  15. C. R. Gallistel, 2018, Finding numbers in the brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London). Series B, 373(1740): 20170119