C. Randy Gallistel

Last updated
Charles Ransom (Randy) Gallistel
C.R. Gallistel headshot 2014.jpg
Born (1941-05-18) May 18, 1941 (age 82)
Indianapolis
NationalityAmerican
Alma materStanford University, Yale University
Occupation(s)Neuroscientist, Psychologist

Charles Ransom Gallistel (born May 18, 1941) is an Emeritus Professor of Psychology at Rutgers University. He is an expert in the cognitive processes of learning and memory, using animal models to carry out research on these topics. Gallistel is married to fellow psychologist Rochel Gelman. Prior to joining the Rutgers faculty he held positions at the University of Pennsylvania, where he was chair of the psychology department and Bernard L. & Ida E. Grossman Term Professor, and at the University of California, Los Angeles. [1] [2]

Contents

Academic career

Gallistel obtained his BA in psychology from Stanford University in 1963 and his PhD in physiological psychology from Yale University in 1966. He joined the faculty of Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania in 1966, where he became full professor in 1976. He moved to UCLA with his wife, Rochel Gelman, in 1989. They moved to Rutgers University, the State University of New Jersey in New Brunswick, NJ in 2000, where they became co-directors of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. Gallistel was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2001 and to the National Academy of Sciences (USA) in 2002.

Research

Gallistel has made experimental and theoretical contributions to several areas of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience: 1) The nature and development of the representation of numerosity in young children, in collaboration with his wife, Rochel Gelman. [3] 2) The psychophysical analysis of the neural substrate for electrical self-stimulation of the brain. [4] 3) The theory of action and its close relation to the theory of motivation. [5] 4) The theory of learning. [6] 5) What it means to say that brains represent the experienced world. [7] 6) The brain's representation of the abstract variables central to conceptions of space (distance & direction), time (duration and phase), numerosity, rate (number/duration) and probability (subset numerosity/set numerosity). [8] 7) The nature of the engram, the physical realization of memory in brains. [9]

Gallistel is an advocate of the computational theory of mind, and as such he criticized the view of memory as an alteration of synaptic connections (a view that is related to Associationism). His critique, in particular, focuses on how the Associationist theory of mind allegedly cannot explain how the brain encodes quantitative data such as distances, directions, and temporal durations. Gallistel rather argues that such memories could be collected inside the neurons, at the molecular level, and to support his claim he remarks the considerable capacity of polynucleotides for storing information. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

Books

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive science</span> Interdisciplinary scientific study of cognitive processes

Cognitive science is the interdisciplinary, scientific study of the mind and its processes with input from linguistics, psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, computer science/artificial intelligence, and anthropology. It examines the nature, the tasks, and the functions of cognition. Cognitive scientists study intelligence and behavior, with a focus on how nervous systems represent, process, and transform information. Mental faculties of concern to cognitive scientists include language, perception, memory, attention, reasoning, and emotion; to understand these faculties, cognitive scientists borrow from fields such as linguistics, psychology, artificial intelligence, philosophy, neuroscience, and anthropology. The typical analysis of cognitive science spans many levels of organization, from learning and decision to logic and planning; from neural circuitry to modular brain organization. One of the fundamental concepts of cognitive science is that "thinking can best be understood in terms of representational structures in the mind and computational procedures that operate on those structures."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive neuroscience</span> Scientific field

Cognitive neuroscience is the scientific field that is concerned with the study of the biological processes and aspects that underlie cognition, with a specific focus on the neural connections in the brain which are involved in mental processes. It addresses the questions of how cognitive activities are affected or controlled by neural circuits in the brain. Cognitive neuroscience is a branch of both neuroscience and psychology, overlapping with disciplines such as behavioral neuroscience, cognitive psychology, physiological psychology and affective neuroscience. Cognitive neuroscience relies upon theories in cognitive science coupled with evidence from neurobiology, and computational modeling.

Computational neuroscience is a branch of neuroscience which employs mathematical models, computer simulations, theoretical analysis and abstractions of the brain to understand the principles that govern the development, structure, physiology and cognitive abilities of the nervous system.

ACT-R is a cognitive architecture mainly developed by John Robert Anderson and Christian Lebiere at Carnegie Mellon University. Like any cognitive architecture, ACT-R aims to define the basic and irreducible cognitive and perceptual operations that enable the human mind. In theory, each task that humans can perform should consist of a series of these discrete operations.

Neurophilosophy or philosophy of neuroscience is the interdisciplinary study of neuroscience and philosophy that explores the relevance of neuroscientific studies to the arguments traditionally categorized as philosophy of mind. The philosophy of neuroscience attempts to clarify neuroscientific methods and results using the conceptual rigor and methods of philosophy of science.

The cognitive revolution was an intellectual movement that began in the 1950s as an interdisciplinary study of the mind and its processes. It later became known collectively as cognitive science. The relevant areas of interchange were between the fields of psychology, linguistics, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, and philosophy. The approaches used were developed within the then-nascent fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and neuroscience. In the 1960s, the Harvard Center for Cognitive Studies and the Center for Human Information Processing at the University of California, San Diego were influential in developing the academic study of cognitive science. By the early 1970s, the cognitive movement had surpassed behaviorism as a psychological paradigm. Furthermore, by the early 1980s the cognitive approach had become the dominant line of research inquiry across most branches in the field of psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Grossberg</span> American scientist (born 1939)

Stephen Grossberg is a cognitive scientist, theoretical and computational psychologist, neuroscientist, mathematician, biomedical engineer, and neuromorphic technologist. He is the Wang Professor of Cognitive and Neural Systems and a Professor Emeritus of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering at Boston University.

In philosophy of mind, the computational theory of mind (CTM), also known as computationalism, is a family of views that hold that the human mind is an information processing system and that cognition and consciousness together are a form of computation. Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts (1943) were the first to suggest that neural activity is computational. They argued that neural computations explain cognition. The theory was proposed in its modern form by Hilary Putnam in 1967, and developed by his PhD student, philosopher, and cognitive scientist Jerry Fodor in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Despite being vigorously disputed in analytic philosophy in the 1990s due to work by Putnam himself, John Searle, and others, the view is common in modern cognitive psychology and is presumed by many theorists of evolutionary psychology. In the 2000s and 2010s, the view has resurfaced in analytic philosophy.

Creative visualization is the cognitive process of purposefully generating visual mental imagery, with eyes open or closed, simulating or recreating visual perception, in order to maintain, inspect, and transform those images, consequently modifying their associated emotions or feelings, with intent to experience a subsequent beneficial physiological, psychological, or social effect, such as expediting the healing of wounds to the body, minimizing physical pain, alleviating psychological pain including anxiety, sadness, and low mood, improving self-esteem or self-confidence, and enhancing the capacity to cope when interacting with others. It can also be a used as a way of facilitating an impossible imagination game.

Numerical cognition is a subdiscipline of cognitive science that studies the cognitive, developmental and neural bases of numbers and mathematics. As with many cognitive science endeavors, this is a highly interdisciplinary topic, and includes researchers in cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, neuroscience and cognitive linguistics. This discipline, although it may interact with questions in the philosophy of mathematics, is primarily concerned with empirical questions.

In human developmental psychology or non-human primate experiments, ordinal numerical competence or ordinal numerical knowledge is the ability to count objects in order and to understand the greater than and less than relationships between numbers. It has been shown that children as young as two can make some ordinal numerical decisions. There are studies indicating that some non-human primates, like chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys have some ordinal numerical competence.

Rochel Gelman is an emeritus psychology professor at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Science. Gelman is married to fellow psychologist C. Randy Gallistel. Prior to joining the Rutgers faculty she taught at the University of California, Los Angeles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tomaso Poggio</span> Italian physicist and computational neuroscientist

Tomaso Armando Poggio, is the Eugene McDermott professor in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, an investigator at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research, a member of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and director of both the Center for Biological and Computational Learning at MIT and the Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines, a multi-institutional collaboration headquartered at the McGovern Institute since 2013.

Common coding theory is a cognitive psychology theory describing how perceptual representations and motor representations are linked. The theory claims that there is a shared representation for both perception and action. More important, seeing an event activates the action associated with that event, and performing an action activates the associated perceptual event.

Bayesian approaches to brain function investigate the capacity of the nervous system to operate in situations of uncertainty in a fashion that is close to the optimal prescribed by Bayesian statistics. This term is used in behavioural sciences and neuroscience and studies associated with this term often strive to explain the brain's cognitive abilities based on statistical principles. It is frequently assumed that the nervous system maintains internal probabilistic models that are updated by neural processing of sensory information using methods approximating those of Bayesian probability.

The LIDA cognitive architecture is an integrated artificial cognitive system that attempts to model a broad spectrum of cognition in biological systems, from low-level perception/action to high-level reasoning. Developed primarily by Stan Franklin and colleagues at the University of Memphis, the LIDA architecture is empirically grounded in cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience. In addition to providing hypotheses to guide further research, the architecture can support control structures for software agents and robots. Providing plausible explanations for many cognitive processes, the LIDA conceptual model is also intended as a tool with which to think about how minds work.

Educational neuroscience is an emerging scientific field that brings together researchers in cognitive neuroscience, developmental cognitive neuroscience, educational psychology, educational technology, education theory and other related disciplines to explore the interactions between biological processes and education. Researchers in educational neuroscience investigate the neural mechanisms of reading, numerical cognition, attention and their attendant difficulties including dyslexia, dyscalculia and ADHD as they relate to education. Researchers in this area may link basic findings in cognitive neuroscience with educational technology to help in curriculum implementation for mathematics education and reading education. The aim of educational neuroscience is to generate basic and applied research that will provide a new transdisciplinary account of learning and teaching, which is capable of informing education. A major goal of educational neuroscience is to bridge the gap between the two fields through a direct dialogue between researchers and educators, avoiding the "middlemen of the brain-based learning industry". These middlemen have a vested commercial interest in the selling of "neuromyths" and their supposed remedies.

Mark A. Gluck is a professor of neuroscience at Rutgers–Newark in New Jersey, director of the Rutgers Memory Disorders Project, and publisher of the public health newsletter, Memory Loss and the Brain. He works at the interface between neuroscience, psychology, and computer science, studying the neural bases of learning and memory. He is the co-author of Gateway to Memory: An Introduction to Neural Network Models of the Hippocampus and an undergraduate textbook Learning and Memory: From Brain to Behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russell Poldrack</span>

Russell "Russ" Alan Poldrack is an American psychologist and neuroscientist. He is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, associate director of Stanford Data Science, member of the Stanford Neuroscience Institute and director of the Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience and the SDS Center for Open and Reproducible Science.

Giorgio Vallortigara is an Italian neuroscientist.

References

  1. Haselgrove, Mark (2016). Learning: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
  2. Stemmy, E. (2004). "Biography of Charles R. Gallistel". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (36): 13121–13123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405840101 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   516534 . PMID   15340141.
  3. R. Gelman et C. R. Gallistel, The Child's Understanding of Number.
  4. C. R. Gallistel, Electrical self-stimulation and its theoretical implications in Psychological Bulletin, 1964, 61, 23-34
  5. C. R. Gallistel, The organization of action: A new synthesis, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 432 pp, 1980
  6. C. R. Gallistel, P. D. Balsam, S. Fairhurst, The learning curve: Implications of a quantitative analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, R 101(36), 2004, p. 13124-13131
  7. C. R. Gallistel, Learning and Representation. In: R. Menzel (ed.), Learning. Theory and Behavior, Vol. 1 of Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, p. 141-154, Academic Press, Oxford
  8. C. R. Gallistel, 2018, Finding numbers in the brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London). Series B, 373(1740): 20170119
  9. Gallistel, C.R. The coding question., 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), 498-508. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.012
  10. C. R. Gallistel, Machinery of cognition, chapitre 3, in Evolution and the Mechanisms of Decision Making. Strüngmann Forum Reports, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2003, p. 39-52
  11. C. R. Gallistel, A. P. King, Memory and the Computational Brain : Why cognitive Science will transform Neuroscience, New York: Blackwell/Wiley, 2009
  12. C.R Gallistel, 2017 The neurobiological bases for the computational theory of mind, in R. G. d. Almeida & L. Gleitman (Eds.), On Concepts, Modules, and Language New York: Oxford University Press.p. 275-296
  13. C. R. Gallistel, 2017, The coding question. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(7), p. 498-508
  14. C. R. Gallistel, 2017, Numbers and brains. Learning & Behavior, 45(4), p. 327-328
  15. C. R. Gallistel, 2018, Finding numbers in the brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London). Series B, 373(1740): 20170119