Caminalcules

Last updated
Eight of the Caminalcules Caminalcules.jpg
Eight of the Caminalcules

Caminalcules are a fictive group of animal-like life forms, which were created as a tool for better understanding phylogenetics in real organisms. They were created by Joseph H. Camin (University of Kansas) and consist of 29 living 'species' and 48 fossil forms. [1]

Contents

The name of the taxon Caminalcules seems to come from Camin's last name and Antonie van Leeuwenhoek's animalcules.

History

Joseph H. Camin (1922–1979) drew the Caminalcules in the early 1960s or possibly even earlier to study the nature of taxonomic judgement. [2] He assured that there was genetic continuity in the Caminalcules by the preservation of all characters except for changes that he desired in all successive animals. He did not keep track of the changes he made in the different species. The images of the Caminalcules were made using master stencils. The images of the living OTUs (29 species) were made available in the early 1960s; those of the fossil ones (48 species) later in the decade. These images were copied using xerography. Copies of all OTUs were in the possession of Dr. Paul A. Ehrlich (Stanford University), Dr. W. Wayne Moss (Philadelphia Academy of Sciences) and Robert R. Sokal (State University of New York at Stony Brook) in 1983. [1] The original drawings by Joseph H. Camin have unfortunately been lost. [1]

The Caminalcules first appeared in print in the journal Systematic Zoology (now Systematic Biology ) in 1983, four years after Camin's death in 1979. Robert R. Sokal published four succeeding papers about them, titled "A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Caminalcules." [1] [3] [4] [5] These papers included the complete set of living and fossil species, as well as their cladogram, which Sokal had received from Camin in 1970. [3]

At a symposium dedicated to Camin, Dr. W. Wayne Moss said that "his collaborative studies on methods and principles of systematics at Kansas in the 1960s resulted in the appearance of that delightful taxon, the Caminalcules", and that "his thoughts helped to launch the infant field of phenetics and cladistics in North America". [2] This quote demonstrates the importance of the Caminalcules for the field of phylogenetics.

Ulrich Wirth introduced also the fictive animal group Didaktozoa in 1993, which was inspired by rotifers. According to Ulrich, the Didaktozoa are handier than the Caminalcules and were created in a way that more biologists would agree with, since phenomena such as homologous structures, apomorphy and organ reduction were taken into account in their creation. [6]

Use in assessment and development of taxonomic methods

The Caminalcules have a known phylogeny, whereas for real organisms it is generally impossible to obtain one. Therefore, Camin expected that they would be useful in evaluating different taxonomic techniques, such as phenetic and cladistic analysis. [7] This was indeed the case; for example, Robert R. Sokal used the Caminalcules to investigate the ability of different numerical methods to estimate the true cladogram [3] as well as the consequences of introducing fossil species into a data set for cladistic and phenetic classifications. [4] Whereas nowadays cladograms are usually created by applying algorithmic methods to gene sequences, Sokal numerically compared the morphological characteristics of organisms, rather than their genetic information. [8] [3]

The Caminalcules can be used as a tool for evaluating taxonomic methods by virtue of their similarity to data sets of real organisms. Many of their properties, including evolutionary rates, species longevity, homoplasy, parallelism, and other measures for quantifying evolutionary change, are within the range of values that have been observed for real organisms. [1] However, the taxonomic diversity distribution of the Caminalcules differs from the taxonomic diversity distributions of real animals and plants, since it does not follow a hollow curve. [9]

Use in education

Caminalcules are commonly used in secondary school and undergraduate university curriculums as a tool for teaching principles of phylogeny and evolution. [10] [7] [11] They can, for example, be used to illustrate the concepts of parsimony and convergent evolution. [7] [10]

Students are typically asked to construct a phylogenetic tree based on the morphological characteristics of the Caminalcules and taking into account evolutionary principles. In an article in American Biology Teacher, Robert P. Gendron published instructions for a lesson plan in which students are first asked to construct a potential tree based solely on the living Caminalcules, followed by a definitive tree that includes the fossil species. [7] Many secondary and tertiary educational institutions around the world have adopted lesson plans that follow this sequence. Some examples are the New York City Lab School for Collaborative Studies, [12] the University of Miami, [13] Carleton College, [14] and the Turkana Basin Institute. [15] Notably, the United States’ National Park Service also uses the Caminalcules in their lesson plans about evolution. [16] [17]

Using Caminalcules to practice the construction of phylogenetic trees has an advantage over using data sets consisting of real organisms, because it prevents the students’ pre-existing knowledge about the classification of real organisms to influence their reasoning during the exercise. [7] They may only use the given data set and the principles of evolution to come to a solution, which is how real taxonomic problems are solved as well.

There are many other popular phylogenetic exercises that use different sets of ‘organisms’, some of which were inspired by the Caminalcule exercises. [18] [10] Potential alternative data sets include sets of twigs, [19] chocolate bars, [20] Chinese masks, [11] and dragons. [10] Students may also be asked to create their own sets of fictional organisms, which has the additional value of demonstrating macroevolutionary processes. [18] Furthermore, in the case of data sets without a known phylogeny, unlike the case of the Caminalcules, students may find multiple, equally correct solutions. This may demonstrate the fact that taxonomic questions do not always have a single correct response, since the true phylogeny often remains unknown. [11]

Related Research Articles

Cladistics is an approach to biological classification in which organisms are categorized in groups ("clades") based on hypotheses of most recent common ancestry. The evidence for hypothesized relationships is typically shared derived characteristics (synapomorphies) that are not present in more distant groups and ancestors. However, from an empirical perspective, common ancestors are inferences based on a cladistic hypothesis of relationships of taxa whose character states can be observed. Theoretically, a last common ancestor and all its descendants constitute a (minimal) clade. Importantly, all descendants stay in their overarching ancestral clade. For example, if the terms worms or fishes were used within a strict cladistic framework, these terms would include humans. Many of these terms are normally used paraphyletically, outside of cladistics, e.g. as a 'grade', which are fruitless to precisely delineate, especially when including extinct species. Radiation results in the generation of new subclades by bifurcation, but in practice sexual hybridization may blur very closely related groupings.

In biology, phylogenetics is the study of the evolutionary history and relationships among or within groups of organisms. These relationships are determined by phylogenetic inference, methods that focus on observed heritable traits, such as DNA sequences, protein amino acid sequences, or morphology. The result of such an analysis is a phylogenetic tree—a diagram containing a hypothesis of relationships that reflects the evolutionary history of a group of organisms.

In biology, phenetics, also known as taximetrics, is an attempt to classify organisms based on overall similarity, usually with respect to morphology or other observable traits, regardless of their phylogeny or evolutionary relation. It is related closely to numerical taxonomy which is concerned with the use of numerical methods for taxonomic classification. Many people contributed to the development of phenetics, but the most influential were Peter Sneath and Robert R. Sokal. Their books are still primary references for this sub-discipline, although now out of print.

In biology, taxonomy is the scientific study of naming, defining (circumscribing) and classifying groups of biological organisms based on shared characteristics. Organisms are grouped into taxa and these groups are given a taxonomic rank; groups of a given rank can be aggregated to form a more inclusive group of higher rank, thus creating a taxonomic hierarchy. The principal ranks in modern use are domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. The Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus is regarded as the founder of the current system of taxonomy, as he developed a ranked system known as Linnaean taxonomy for categorizing organisms and binomial nomenclature for naming organisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cladogram</span> Diagram used to show relations among groups of organisms with common origins

A cladogram is a diagram used in cladistics to show relations among organisms. A cladogram is not, however, an evolutionary tree because it does not show how ancestors are related to descendants, nor does it show how much they have changed, so many differing evolutionary trees can be consistent with the same cladogram. A cladogram uses lines that branch off in different directions ending at a clade, a group of organisms with a last common ancestor. There are many shapes of cladograms but they all have lines that branch off from other lines. The lines can be traced back to where they branch off. These branching off points represent a hypothetical ancestor which can be inferred to exhibit the traits shared among the terminal taxa above it. This hypothetical ancestor might then provide clues about the order of evolution of various features, adaptation, and other evolutionary narratives about ancestors. Although traditionally such cladograms were generated largely on the basis of morphological characters, DNA and RNA sequencing data and computational phylogenetics are now very commonly used in the generation of cladograms, either on their own or in combination with morphology.

Molecular phylogenetics is the branch of phylogeny that analyzes genetic, hereditary molecular differences, predominantly in DNA sequences, to gain information on an organism's evolutionary relationships. From these analyses, it is possible to determine the processes by which diversity among species has been achieved. The result of a molecular phylogenetic analysis is expressed in a phylogenetic tree. Molecular phylogenetics is one aspect of molecular systematics, a broader term that also includes the use of molecular data in taxonomy and biogeography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phylogenesis</span>

Phylogenesis is the biological process by which a taxon appears. The science that studies these processes is called phylogenetics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avida (software)</span> Artificial life software platform

Avida is an artificial life software platform to study the evolutionary biology of self-replicating and evolving computer programs. Avida is under active development by Charles Ofria's Digital Evolution Lab at Michigan State University; the first version of Avida was designed in 1993 by Ofria, Chris Adami and C. Titus Brown at Caltech, and has been fully reengineered by Ofria on multiple occasions since then. The software was originally inspired by the Tierra system.

Evolutionary taxonomy, evolutionary systematics or Darwinian classification is a branch of biological classification that seeks to classify organisms using a combination of phylogenetic relationship, progenitor-descendant relationship, and degree of evolutionary change. This type of taxonomy may consider whole taxa rather than single species, so that groups of species can be inferred as giving rise to new groups. The concept found its most well-known form in the modern evolutionary synthesis of the early 1940s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outgroup (cladistics)</span>

In cladistics or phylogenetics, an outgroup is a more distantly related group of organisms that serves as a reference group when determining the evolutionary relationships of the ingroup, the set of organisms under study, and is distinct from sociological outgroups. The outgroup is used as a point of comparison for the ingroup and specifically allows for the phylogeny to be rooted. Because the polarity (direction) of character change can be determined only on a rooted phylogeny, the choice of outgroup is essential for understanding the evolution of traits along a phylogeny.

<i>Incertae sedis</i> Term to indicate an uncertain taxonomic position

Incertae sedis or problematica is a term used for a taxonomic group where its broader relationships are unknown or undefined. Alternatively, such groups are frequently referred to as "enigmatic taxa". In the system of open nomenclature, uncertainty at specific taxonomic levels is indicated by incertae familiae, incerti subordinis, incerti ordinis and similar terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iguanomorpha</span> Infraorder of lizards

Iguania is an infraorder of squamate reptiles that includes iguanas, chameleons, agamids, and New World lizards like anoles and phrynosomatids. Using morphological features as a guide to evolutionary relationships, the Iguania are believed to form the sister group to the remainder of the Squamata, which comprise nearly 11,000 named species, roughly 2000 of which are iguanians. However, molecular information has placed Iguania well within the Squamata as sister taxa to the Anguimorpha and closely related to snakes. The order has been under debate and revisions after being classified by Charles Lewis Camp in 1923 due to difficulties finding adequate synapomorphic morphological characteristics. Most iguanians are arboreal but there are several terrestrial groups. They usually have primitive fleshy, non-prehensile tongues, although the tongue is highly modified in chameleons. Today they are scattered occurring in Madagascar, the Fiji and Friendly Islands and Western Hemisphere.

Phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) use information on the historical relationships of lineages (phylogenies) to test evolutionary hypotheses. The comparative method has a long history in evolutionary biology; indeed, Charles Darwin used differences and similarities between species as a major source of evidence in The Origin of Species. However, the fact that closely related lineages share many traits and trait combinations as a result of the process of descent with modification means that lineages are not independent. This realization inspired the development of explicitly phylogenetic comparative methods. Initially, these methods were primarily developed to control for phylogenetic history when testing for adaptation; however, in recent years the use of the term has broadened to include any use of phylogenies in statistical tests. Although most studies that employ PCMs focus on extant organisms, many methods can also be applied to extinct taxa and can incorporate information from the fossil record.

Phylogenetic nomenclature is a method of nomenclature for taxa in biology that uses phylogenetic definitions for taxon names as explained below. This contrasts with the traditional method, by which taxon names are defined by a type, which can be a specimen or a taxon of lower rank, and a description in words. Phylogenetic nomenclature is regulated currently by the International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature (PhyloCode).

Walter Max Zimmermann was a German botanist and systematist. Zimmernann’s notions of classifying life objectively based on phylogenetic methods and on evolutionarily important characters were foundational for modern phylogenetics. Though they were later implemented by Willi Hennig in his fundamental work on phylogenetic systematics, Zimmermann's contributions to this field have largely been overlooked. Zimmermann also made several significant developments in the field of plant systematics such as the discovery of the telome theory. The standard botanical author abbreviation W.Zimm. is applied to species he described.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phylum</span> High level taxonomic rank for organisms sharing a similar body plan

In biology, a phylum is a level of classification or taxonomic rank below kingdom and above class. Traditionally, in botany the term division has been used instead of phylum, although the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants accepts the terms as equivalent. Depending on definitions, the animal kingdom Animalia contains about 31 phyla, the plant kingdom Plantae contains about 14 phyla, and the fungus kingdom Fungi contains about 8 phyla. Current research in phylogenetics is uncovering the relationships among phyla within larger clades like Ecdysozoa and Embryophyta.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euthyneura</span> Clade of molluscs

Euthyneura is a taxonomic infraclass of snails and slugs, which includes species exclusively from marine, aquatic and terrestrial gastropod mollusks in the clade Heterobranchia.

Turtles have been classified in different ways by different authors. While they were previously considered anapsids, they are now considered more derived. Recent analyses of molecular evidence have strongly suggested that they belong in the clade Archosauromorpha. Below are many of the possible classifications of Testudines and Testudinata:

Transformed cladistics, also known as pattern cladistics is an epistemological approach to the cladistic method of phylogenetic inference and classification that makes no a priori assumptions about common ancestry. It was advocated by Norman Platnick, Colin Patterson, Ronald Brady and others in the 1980s, but has few modern proponents. The book, Foundations of Systematics and Biogeography by David Williams and Malte Ebach provides a thoughtful history of the origins of this point of view.

Kevin de Queiroz is a vertebrate, evolutionary, and systematic biologist. He has worked in the phylogenetics and evolutionary biology of squamate reptiles, the development of a unified species concept and of a phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature, and the philosophy of systematic biology.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Sokal, R. R. (June 1983). "A phylogenetic analysis of the Caminalcules. I. The data base". Systematic Zoology. 32 (2): 159–184. doi:10.2307/2413279. JSTOR   2413279.
  2. 1 2 Moss, W. W. (1979). "Dedication to Joseph H. Camin (1922-1979)". American Zoologist. 19 (4): 1179. doi: 10.1093/icb/19.4.1179 .
  3. 1 2 3 4 Sokal, R. R. (June 1983). "A phylogenetic analysis of the Caminalcules. II. Estimating the true cladogram". Systematic Zoology. 32 (2): 185–201. doi:10.2307/2413280. JSTOR   2413280.
  4. 1 2 Sokal, R. R. (September 1983). "A phylogenetic analysis of the Caminalcules. III. Fossils and Classification". Systematic Zoology. 32 (3): 248–258. doi:10.2307/2413445. JSTOR   2413445.
  5. ↑ Sokal, R. R. (September 1983). "A phylogenetic analysis of the Caminalcules. IV. Congruence and Character Stability". Systematic Zoology. 32 (3): 259–275. doi:10.2307/2413446. JSTOR   2413446.
  6. ↑ Wirth, U. (1993). "Caminalcules and Didaktozoa: Imaginary Organisms as Test-Examples for Systematics". In Opitz, Otto; Lausen, Berthold; Klar, Rüdiger (eds.). Information and Classification. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis and Knowledge Organization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 421–433. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-50974-2_43. ISBN   978-3-642-50974-2.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Gendron, R. P. (2000). "The classification and evolution of Caminalcules". The American Biology Teacher. 62 (8): 570–576. doi:10.2307/4450980. JSTOR   4450980.
  8. ↑ Agapakis, C. (27 March 2013). "Synthetic classification: The evolution of imaginary animals". Scientific American. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  9. ↑ Holman, E. W. (1986). "A Taxonomic Difference Between the Caminalcules and Real Organisms". Systematic Zoology. 35 (2): 259–261. doi:10.2307/2413437. ISSN   0039-7989. JSTOR   2413437.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Cruz, R. A. L. (2017). "Here Be Dragons: Using Dragons as Models for Phylogenetic Analysis". The American Biology Teacher. 79 (7): 544–551. doi:10.1525/abt.2017.79.7.544. ISSN   0002-7685. S2CID   91044116.
  11. 1 2 3 Russo, C. A. M.; Aguiar, B. O.; Voloch, C. M.; Selvatti, A. P. (2016). "When Chinese Masks Meet Phylogenetics". The American Biology Teacher. 78 (3): 241–247. doi:10.1525/abt.2016.78.3.241. S2CID   87808288.
  12. ↑ Drozd, A. (April 5, 2019). Caminalcules instructions by Susan Price [Video file]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-a-SSX8pns&ab_channel=AndrewDrozd  
  13. ↑ Caminalcules. (n.d.). University of Miami. http://ww.bio.miami.edu/dana/107/Caminalcules.pdf
  14. ↑ Ausich, W. I. "Caminalcule phylogenetic exercise". SERC. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  15. ↑ Yang, D. (22 March 2017). "A family tree of Caminalcules". Turkana Basin Institute. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  16. ↑ "Canon Paleo Curriculum Unit 3: Evolution Lesson Plan 5". National Park Service. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  17. ↑ "Canon Paleo Curriculum Unit 3: Evolution Lesson Plan 6" (PDF). National Park Service. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  18. 1 2 Brown, C. G. (2016). "Modeling Macroevolution with Invented Creatures". The American Biology Teacher. 78 (2): 141–148. doi:10.1525/abt.2016.78.2.141. ISSN   0002-7685. S2CID   86141486.
  19. ↑ Flinn, K. M. (2015). "Building a Twig Phylogeny". The American Biology Teacher. 77 (2): 141–144. doi:10.1525/abt.2015.77.2.10. ISSN   0002-7685. JSTOR   10.1525/abt.2015.77.2.10. S2CID   83841790.
  20. ↑ Burks, R. L.; Boles, L. C. (2007). "Evolution of the Chocolate Bar: A Creative Approach to Teaching Phylogenetic Relationships within Evolutionary Biology". The American Biology Teacher. 69 (4): 229–237. doi:10.2307/4452143. ISSN   0002-7685. JSTOR   4452143.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.