Clergy housing allowance

Last updated

The clergy housing allowance (sometimes called a parsonage allowance or a rental allowance) is an allowance paid to ordained ministers and rabbis in Canada and the United States. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

United States

In the United States, the rental value of a home furnished to, or the rental allowance paid to, a minister of the gospel or rabbi is not included in his or her taxable income if certain conditions are met. [2] [4] [5] [6] [3] [7]

Qualifying clergy and services performed

In order to qualify, the clergy must be duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed by a religious body constituting a church or church denomination or synagogue, and the clergy must be given the authority to conduct religious worship according to the prescribed tenets and practices of that religious organization. [2] [4] [5] [6] [8] [3]

The allowance must be for the minister's or rabbi's services performed:

In order to qualify, the service must be performed for a church or synagogue or an integral agency of a religious organization. An integral agency of a religious organization is generally one where several of the following apply.

The following services do not qualify:

Retired clergy

Retired clergy are also eligible to claim the exclusion for the housing allowance because the Internal Revenue Service deems clergy housing allowance as compensation for past services as clergy. [8] [12]

The tax-exclusion for clergy housing allowance also applies to retired clergy. A retired minister or rabbi who receives compensation for past services, such as withdrawals from an employer-sponsored retirement plan, may designate a portion of the compensation as a clergy housing allowance, and this amount is excluded from taxable income to the extent it is used for expenses directly related to providing a home. [13]

In the case of a widow of a deceased minister or rabbi, the tax-exclusion applies only if the housing allowance is designated with respect to a retirement plan representing compensation earned by the widow for the widow's past services that were in the exercise of ministry. [14] [15]

Qualifying housing costs

The home must actually be used as a home by the clergy. The allowance cannot exceed the fair rental value of the home, furnishings, appurtenances, and utilities. [4] [5] [6] Clergy may legitimately include housing costs such as cost of buying or renting a home, real estate taxes, mortgage interest, condo or co-op fees, homeowners association dues, heat, electricity, basic telephone service, water, sewage, furniture, appliances, dishes, cookware, rugs, pictures, curtains, bedspreads, sheets, towels, insurance on the home and its contents, home improvements, home repairs and maintenance, home cleaning, snow removal, and lawn mowing. [16] [17]

The minister's or rabbi's total compensation, including salary, fringe benefits, and clergy housing allowing, cannot exceed reasonable compensation for the services performed. [16] [18] p. 22 [2] [3]

Reporting and taxation

After year-end, the church or religious organization must provide a written notice indicating the total amount of clergy housing allowance for the year; using box 14 of a Form W-2 is an example of such a written notice. [16] [3]

Clergy housing allowance is not generally subject to income tax, but it is generally subject to self-employment tax [6] unless the person is retired clergy. [18] p. 23

In November 2013, the clergy housing allowance faced judicial opposition. In Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Lew, the Federal District Court of the Western District of Wisconsin issued a decision holding that the allowance violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. However, the Justice Department appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court reversed the decision, ruling that the plaintiff did not have standing; therefore the tax-free status remained unchanged. [19]

Because the reversal pertained to standing of the plaintiff and not to the merits of the case, the same case, with minor revision, was reinstituted by the Freedom From Religion Foundation in the same federal district court in 2017. [20] [21]

On October 6, 2017, the federal judge struck down the clergy housing allowance, ruling that the law is an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment's establishment clause, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion", because the law "does not have a secular purpose or effect and because a reasonable observer would view the statute as an endorsement of religion". [20] [22] [23]

The ruling only affects tax-free compensation paid to clergy, which the clergy uses to pay for the clergy's own home. [24] The ruling does not affect housing actually owned by, or leased by, a church. [24]

On December 13, 2017, the federal judge ordered that any injunction should be stayed for 180 days pending resolution of any appeals, so the effect of the decision was not yet in effect. [24] [25]

On March 15, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled on the law exempting clergy housing allowances from income tax, saying that its effect was to "neither to endorse nor to inhibit religion". [26] The Court of Appeals affirmed that Congress has the power to provide federal tax exemptions for religious organizations and that Congress has done so since at least 1802. [26] The Court of Appeals stated that while any sort of financial interaction between a religious entity and the government may be considered a degree of entanglement, but the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution is violated only with excessive entanglement. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clergy</span> Formal leaders within established religions

Clergy are formal leaders within established religions. Their roles and functions vary in different religious traditions, but usually involve presiding over specific rituals and teaching their religion's doctrines and practices. Some of the terms used for individual clergy are clergyman, clergywoman, clergyperson, churchman, cleric, ecclesiastic, and vicegerent while clerk in holy orders has a long history but is rarely used.

A rabbi is a spiritual leader or religious teacher in Judaism. One becomes a rabbi by being ordained by another rabbi—known as semikha—following a course of study of Jewish history and texts such as the Talmud. The basic form of the rabbi developed in the Pharisaic and Talmudic eras, when learned teachers assembled to codify Judaism's written and oral laws. The title "rabbi" was first used in the first century CE. In more recent centuries, the duties of a rabbi became increasingly influenced by the duties of the Protestant Christian minister, hence the title "pulpit rabbis", and in 19th-century Germany and the United States rabbinic activities including sermons, pastoral counseling, and representing the community to the outside, all increased in importance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom From Religion Foundation</span> American nonprofit organization

The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) is an American nonprofit organization that advocates for atheists, agnostics, and nontheists. Formed in 1976, FFRF promotes the separation of church and state, and challenges the legitimacy of many federal and state programs that are faith-based. It supports groups such as nonreligious students and clergy who want to leave their faith.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clergy house</span> Residence of one or more priests or ministers of religion

A clergy house is the residence, or former residence, of one or more priests or ministers of a given religion. Residences of this type can have a variety of names, such as manse, parsonage, rectory, or vicarage.

The Canada Revenue Agency is the revenue service of the Canadian federal government, and most provincial and territorial governments. The CRA collects taxes, administers tax law and policy, and delivers benefit programs and tax credits. Legislation administered by the CRA includes the Income Tax Act, parts of the Excise Tax Act, and parts of laws relating to the Canada Pension Plan, employment insurance (EI), tariffs and duties. The agency also oversees the registration of charities in Canada, and enforces much of the country's tax laws.

Jewish leadership has evolved over time. Since the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem in 70 CE, there has been no single body that has a leadership position over the entire Jewish diaspora. Various branches of Judaism, as well as Jewish religious or secular communities and political movements around the world elect or appoint their governing bodies, often subdivided by country or region.

A 501(c) organization is a nonprofit organization in the federal law of the United States according to Internal Revenue Code and is one of over 29 types of nonprofit organizations exempt from some federal income taxes. Sections 503 through 505 set out the requirements for obtaining such exemptions. Many states refer to Section 501(c) for definitions of organizations exempt from state taxation as well. 501(c) organizations can receive unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, and unions.

A church tax is a tax collected by the state from members of some religious denominations to provide financial support of churches, such as the salaries of its clergy and to pay the operating cost of the church. Not all countries have such a tax. In some countries that do, people who are not members of a religious community are exempt from the tax; in others it is always levied, with the payer often entitled to choose who receives it, typically the state or an activity of social interest.

McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case related to the power of a state to use its tax-supported public school system to aid religious instruction. The case was a test of the separation of church and state with respect to education.

A 501(c)(3) organization is a United States corporation, trust, unincorporated association or other type of organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of Title 26 of the United States Code. It is one of the 29 types of 501(c) nonprofit organizations in the US.

Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, 551 U.S. 587 (2007), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which ruled that taxpayers do not have the right to challenge the constitutionality of expenditures by the executive branch of the government. The issue was whether taxpayers have the right to challenge the existence of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. The case centered on three Supreme Court precedents: Flast v. Cohen, Bowen v. Kendrick, and Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientology status by country</span>

Recognition of Scientology and the Church of Scientology varies from country to country with respect to state recognition for religious status, charitable status, or tax exempt status. Decisions are contingent upon the legal constructs of each individual country, and results are not uniform worldwide. For example, the absence of a clear definition for 'religion' or 'religious worship' has resulted in unresolved and uncertain status for Scientology in some countries.

The issue of Freedom of religion in Russia is complex with a long and fraught history. As of 2023, Russia is a majority Russian Orthodox society, with significant minority religions within its borders protected by the Constitution of Russia. However, the international community often disputes whether this protection is carried out in practice.

Barbara Brandriff Crabb is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

Tax protesters in the United States advance a number of constitutional arguments asserting that the imposition, assessment and collection of the federal income tax violates the United States Constitution. These kinds of arguments, though related to, are distinguished from statutory and administrative arguments, which presuppose the constitutionality of the income tax, as well as from general conspiracy arguments, which are based upon the proposition that the three branches of the federal government are involved together in a deliberate, on-going campaign of deception for the purpose of defrauding individuals or entities of their wealth or profits. Although constitutional challenges to U.S. tax laws are frequently directed towards the validity and effect of the Sixteenth Amendment, assertions that the income tax violates various other provisions of the Constitution have been made as well.

The government of the Soviet Union followed an unofficial policy of state atheism, aiming to gradually eliminate religious belief within its borders. While it never officially made religion illegal, the state nevertheless made great efforts to reduce the prevalence of religious belief within society. To this end, at various times in its history it engaged in anti-religious persecutions of varying intensity and methodology. Believers were never officially attacked for being believers, but they were officially attacked for real or perceived political opposition to the state and to its policies. These attacks, however, in the broader ideological context, were meant to serve the ultimate goal of eliminating religion, and the perceived political opposition acted as a legal pretext to carry this out. Thus, although the Soviet Union was officially a secular state and guaranteed freedom of religion in its constitutions, in practice believers suffered discrimination and were widely attacked for promoting religion.

East Meadow Beth-El Jewish Center (EMJC) is a Conservative synagogue located at 1400 Prospect Avenue, East Meadow, on Long Island, New York, in the United States. Temple Beth-El of Bellmore, New York, consolidated with East Meadow Jewish Center to create East Meadow Beth-El Jewish Center. Rabbi Dr. Ronald L. Androphy has been the rabbi of the synagogue since 1983.

<i>R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal</i>

R v Registrar General ex parte Segerdal and another was a court case heard by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, which was instrumental in determining whether the Church of Scientology was to be considered a bona fide religion in England and Wales, and by extension what defines a religion in English law. The case, heard in 1969–70, focused on the question of whether a chapel at the Scientologists' UK headquarters should be registered as a meeting place for religious worship under an 1855 law. The Church's initial application was refused and it appealed the case to the courts, arguing that Scientology was a genuine religion and that it used the chapel for religious purposes. In dismissing the appeal, the Court of Appeal found that Scientology's practices "did not reveal any form whatever of worship". Ten years later, the Segerdal ruling was drawn upon to define a religion for the purposes of English common law as requiring "faith in a god and worship of that god". The Segerdal ruling was later overturned by the Supreme Court in 2013 who redefined the term "religion" in a modern context and ruled that Scientology is to be recognised as a religion in the UK.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal status of the Universal Life Church</span>

The legal status of the Universal Life Church encompasses a collection of court decisions and state executive branch pronouncements determining what rights the Universal Life Church (ULC) and comparable organizations have as religious organizations.

Church of Atheism of Central Canada v Canada (National Revenue) 2019 FCA 296 (CanLII) is a 2019 Federal Court of Appeal case in Canada. It was brought by the Church of Atheism of Central Canada against the Canada Revenue Agency after the Minister of National Revenue rejected their application for religious charitable status. The court determined on a unanimous verdict that atheism is not a religion and not eligible for tax-exempt charity status.

References

  1. ↑ "Ministers' Compensation & Housing Allowance | Internal Revenue Service". www.irs.gov.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Parsonage". Reform Pension Board.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Here's why rabbis can keep their housing expenses tax free".
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 "U.S. Code § 107 - Rental value of parsonages". Internal Revenue Service. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. August 16, 1954. Amended on May 20, 2002. Accessed on March 29, 2016.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 "Publication 15-A: Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide". Internal Revenue Service. 2016.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Publication 517: Social Security and Other Information for Members of the Clergy and Religious Workers". Internal Revenue Service. 2015.
  7. ↑ Oster, Marcy. "US rabbis' housing expenses to remain tax free". www.timesofisrael.com.
  8. 1 2 "Treasury Regulation Section 1.107-1: Rental value of parsonages". Internal Revenue Service. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. Retrieved October 25, 2017.
  9. ↑ "Treasury Regulation Section 1.1402(c)-5: Ministers and members of religious orders". Internal Revenue Service. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. Retrieved October 25, 2017.
  10. ↑ Rev. Rul. 62-171, 1962-2 C.B.
  11. ↑ Rev. Rul. 72-606.
  12. ↑ Revenue Ruling 63-156, 1963-2 C.B. 79. Internal Revenue Service.
  13. ↑ Internal Revenue Service Rev. Rul. 63-156.
  14. ↑ Internal Revenue Service Rev. Rul. 72-249.
  15. ↑ Internal Revenue Service Private Letter Ruling 8404101 (1984).
  16. 1 2 3 "The Minister’s Housing Allowance". Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability . Retrieved December 24, 2017.
  17. ↑ Smilowitz, Mitchell J. (2023). "Understanding the Parsonage Allowance Part 2: Calculating the Parsonage Allowance". Joint Retirement Board for Conservative Judaism.
  18. 1 2 "Publication 1828: Tax Guide for Churches & Religious Organizations". Internal Revenue Service. 2015.
  19. ↑ "Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Lew". United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit . No. 14–1152. November 13, 2014.
  20. 1 2 Bruinius, Harry. "Why a former minister is challenging churches' tax privileges in US". The Christian Science Monitor. October 20, 2017.
  21. ↑ "Gaylor, Barker, Gaylor, and Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Mnuchin and Koskinen". United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit . April 6, 2016.
  22. ↑ Reilly, Peter J. "Clergy Housing Tax Break Ruled Unconstitutional - Again". Forbes . October 7, 2017.
  23. ↑ "Gaylor, Barker, Gaylor, and Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Mnuchin and Koskinen". United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit . October 6, 2017.
  24. 1 2 3 Reilly, Peter J. "Tax Free Housing Benefits For Clergy Will Be Safe For The Present". Forbes . December 23, 2017.
  25. ↑ "Gaylor, Barker, Gaylor, and Freedom from Religion Foundation v. Mnuchin and Koskinen". United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit . December 13, 2017.
  26. 1 2 Bauer, Scott (March 15, 2019). "Federal appeals court OKs tax-free housing for clergy". The Washington Post.
  27. ↑ Banks, Adelle M. (March 19, 2019). "Clergy housing allowance is constitutional, appeals court rules". Religion News Service.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.