Clipperton Island case

Last updated
Arbitral Award on the Subject of the Difference Relative to the Sovereignty over Clipperton Island
Clipperton.jpg
1930s map of Clipperton Island
SignedJanuary 28, 1931 (1931-01-28)
Location Rome, Italy
Mediators Flag of Italy (1861-1946).svg Victor Emmanuel III
Parties
Language
English translation [3]

The Clipperton Island case was an arbitration between France and Mexico over the sovereignty of Clipperton Island. The dispute was adjudicated by the King of Italy in 1931, who awarded the island to France. The case forms an important precedent in international law, particularly in matters of territorial sovereignty and the role of arbitration in resolving disputes between nations.

Contents

Background

Location of Clipperton Island Clipperton Island in North America.svg
Location of Clipperton Island

Clipperton Island, an uninhabited atoll in the Pacific Ocean, became the subject of a territorial dispute between France and Mexico in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. [4] [5] The island gained significant attention due to its strategic location in the Pacific Ocean and the potential for guano deposits, which were used to enhance fertilizer. [6] [7] Initially France, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States all laid claims to Clipperton. [8] Both the United Kingdom and United States dropped their claims to the island, leaving only France and Mexico. [9]

On November 17, 1858, Lieutenant Victor Le Coat de Kervéguen on the French merchant ship L'Amiral took possession of Clipperton for France. [9] Upon arriving in the Kingdom of Hawaii, a notice of France's annexation of Clipperton was published on November 17, 1858, in a local newspaper in Honolulu. [10] [11]

In 1897, a Mexican expedition raised the Mexican flag on Clipperton as a way to strengthen their claim to Clipperton. [12] In 1905, the Mexican government established a military garrison on the island, and later erected a lighthouse under the orders of President Porfirio Díaz. [13] [14] By 1914, around 100 Mexican settlers had landed on the island to further establish Mexico's claim. [15] [16] Due to the start of the Mexican Revolution, supply ships ceased visiting the island and by 1917 many settlers had perished from scurvy. [17] The survivors were rescued, and returned to Mexico. [18] [19]

Arbitration

Victor Emmanuel III in 1930 Portrait of H.M. King Vittorio Emanuele III of Italy.png
Victor Emmanuel III in 1930

On March 2, 1909, the two countries signed an agreement in Mexico to submit the dispute to arbitration, and selected King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy as arbiter. [3] [20] Nearly 22 years later, on January 28, 1931, Victor Emmanuel rendered his decision, awarding the island to France. [4] [3] [21]

There is no reason to suppose that France has subsequently lost her right by derelictio, since she never had the animus of abandoning the island, and the fact that she has not exercised her authority there in a positive manner does not imply the forfeiture of an acquisition already definitively perfected.

—  Victor Emmanuel III of Italy, Arbitral Award on the Subject of the Difference Relative to the Sovereignty over Clipperton Island [3]

France's argument for its ownership of Clipperton was based on its 1858 claim and the formal annexation of the island and that the land was terra nullius . [20] [22] Additionally, France had maintained its ownership of Clipperton when other nations had claimed or landed on Clipperton. [23] Mexico made the claim that Clipperton had been discovered by the Spanish Navy and that the papal bull of Alexander VI in 1492 had given sovereignty of the island to Spain. [24] [25] Following Spain's recognition of Mexico in 1836 following the Mexican War of Independence, Mexico retained all of the Spanish territory including the adjacent islands and annexed lands. [26] [27] Additionally, Mexico had both geographic proximity and effective occupation of the island in the early 20th century. [5] [28] The core legal question was which principle was more important in international law: historical claim or effective occupation. [29]

Impact on international law

An important result of the Clipperton Island case was that the first nation to discover and prove unclaimed land exists has claim to said territory. [30] [31] This means that the occupation of a territory is not always a requirement for making a claim on it. [32] [33] Nations wishing to make a claim on territory are required to exercise exclusive authority on the territory. [3] [34] Although the levels of exclusive authority are interrupted on a case-by-case basis, with uninhabitable areas such as Clipperton having a much lower bar than territory with a native population. [23] [35] [36] France's continued claims of sovereignty over the island, even when Mexico made claims, was an important part of the arbitration going in their favor. [33] As a further result of this ruling, nations which make claims on territory do not forfeit said territory when it is unoccupied or not actively developed. [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Country</span> Distinct territorial body or political entity

A country is a distinct part of the world, such as a state, nation, or other political entity. When referring to a specific polity, the term "country" may refer to a sovereign state, states with limited recognition, constituent country, or a dependent territory. Most sovereign states, but not all countries, are members of the United Nations. There is no universal agreement on the number of "countries" in the world since several states have disputed sovereignty status, limited recognition and a number of non-sovereign entities are commonly called countries. "Country" can also be a region that sovereign states here jointly claim sovereignty over, eg Korea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clipperton Island</span> Atoll of Overseas France

Clipperton Island, also known as Clipperton Atoll and previously as Clipperton's Rock, is an 8.9 km2 (3.4 sq mi) uninhabited French coral atoll in the eastern Pacific Ocean. The only French territory in the North Pacific, Clipperton is 10,675 km (6,633 mi) from Paris, France; 5,400 km (2,900 nmi) from Papeete, French Polynesia; and 1,280 km (690 nmi) from Acapulco, Mexico.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">League of Nations mandate</span> Territories administered by countries on behalf of the League of Nations

A League of Nations mandate represented a legal status under international law for specific territories following World War I, involving the transfer of control from one nation to another. These mandates served as legal documents establishing the internationally agreed terms for administering the territory on behalf of the League of Nations. Combining elements of both a treaty and a constitution, these mandates contained minority rights clauses that provided for the rights of petition and adjudication by the Permanent Court of International Justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Permanent Court of International Justice</span> International court from 1922 to 1946

The Permanent Court of International Justice, often called the World Court, existed from 1922 to 1946. It was an international court attached to the League of Nations. Created in 1920, the Court was initially well-received from states and academics alike, with many cases submitted to it for its first decade of operation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Permanent Court of Arbitration</span> Intergovernmental organization

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is a non-UN intergovernmental organization headquartered at the Peace Palace, in The Hague, Netherlands. Unlike a judicial court in the traditional sense, the PCA provides administrative support in international arbitrations involving various combinations of States, State entities, international organizations and private parties. The cases span a range of legal issues involving territorial and maritime boundaries, sovereignty, human rights, international investment, and international and regional trade. The PCA is constituted through two separate multilateral conventions with a combined membership of 122 Contracting Parties. The PCA is not a United Nations agency, but has been a United Nations observer since 1993.

<i>Terra nullius</i> International law term for unclaimed land

Terra nullius is a Latin expression meaning "nobody's land". Since the nineteenth century it has occasionally been used in international law as a principle to justify claims that territory may be acquired by a state's occupation of it. There are currently three territories sometimes claimed to be terra nullius: Bir Tawil, four pockets of land near the Danube due to the Croatia–Serbia border dispute, and parts of Antarctica, principally Marie Byrd Land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exclusive economic zone</span> Adjacent sea zone in which a state has special rights

An exclusive economic zone (EEZ), as prescribed by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, is an area of the sea in which a sovereign state has exclusive rights regarding the exploration and use of marine resources, including energy production from water and wind.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scarborough Shoal</span> Disputed atoll in the South China Sea

Scarborough Shoal, also known as Panacot,Bajo de Masinloc, Huangyan Island, Minzhu Jiao, and Panatag Shoal, are two skerries located between Macclesfield Bank to the west and Luzon to the east. Luzon is 220 kilometres (119 nmi) away and the nearest landmass. The atoll is a disputed territory claimed by the Republic of the Philippines through the 1734 Velarde map, as well as the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan). The atoll's status is often discussed in conjunction with other territorial disputes in the South China Sea, such as those involving the Spratly Islands, and the 2012 Scarborough Shoal standoff. In 2013, the Philippines initiated arbitration against China under UNCLOS. In 2016, the tribunal ruled that China's historic title within the nine-dash line was invalid but did not rule on sovereignty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards</span> International treaty within the UN framework

The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, commonly known as the New York Convention, was adopted by a United Nations diplomatic conference on 10 June 1958 and entered into force on 7 June 1959. The Convention requires courts of contracting states to give effect to private agreements to arbitrate and to recognize and enforce arbitration awards made in other contracting states. Widely considered the foundational instrument for international arbitration, it applies to arbitrations that are not considered as domestic awards in the state where recognition and enforcement is sought.

<i>Island of Palmas Case</i> Legal case

The Island of Palmas Case was a territorial dispute over the Island of Palmas between the Netherlands and the United States which was heard by the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Palmas was declared to be a part of the Netherlands East Indies and is now part of Indonesia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute</span> Territorial dispute between Guyana and Venezuela

The Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute between Guyana and Venezuela over the Essequibo region, also known as Esequibo or Guayana Esequiba in Spanish, a 159,500 km2 (61,600 sq mi) area west of the Essequibo River. The territory, excluding the Venezuelan-controlled Ankoko Island, is controlled by Guyana as part of six of its regions, based on the 1899 Paris Arbitral Award. It is also claimed by Venezuela as the Guayana Esequiba State. The boundary dispute was inherited from the colonial powers and has persisted following the independence of Venezuela and Guyana.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arbitration</span> Method of dispute resolution

Arbitration is a formal method of dispute resolution involving a neutral third party who makes a binding decision. The third party neutral renders the decision in the form of an 'arbitration award'. An arbitration decision or award is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in the courts, unless all parties stipulate that the arbitration process and decision are non-binding.

A number of methods of acquisition of sovereignty are or have been recognised by international law as lawful methods by which a state may acquire sovereignty over territory. International law adopts much of Roman property law in regards to acquisition of sovereignty due to the underlying European civil law at the time of early discovery voyages such as Christopher Columbus. The basis of acquisition of states ownership of vacant territory therefore continues to apply,.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canada–France Maritime Boundary Case</span> 1992 arbitration of Exclusive Economic Zone dispute

The Canada–France Maritime Boundary Case was a dispute between Canada and France that was decided in 1992 by an arbitral tribunal created by the parties to resolve the dispute. The decision established the extent of the Exclusive Economic Zone of the French territory of Saint Pierre and Miquelon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spratly Islands dispute</span> Territorial dispute involving multiple countries over the Spratly Islands.

The Spratly Islands dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute among Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam concerning "ownership" of the Spratly Islands, a group of islands and associated "maritime features" located in the South China Sea. The dispute is characterized by diplomatic stalemate and the employment of military pressure techniques in the advancement of national territorial claims. All except Brunei occupy some of the maritime features.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Borders of Suriname</span> Country borders

The borders of Suriname consist of land borders with three countries: Guyana, Brazil, and France. The borders with Guyana and France are in dispute, but the border with Brazil has been uncontroversial since 1906.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nine-dash line</span> Contested Chinese map of South China Sea

The nine-dash line, also referred to as the eleven-dash line by Taiwan, is a set of line segments on various maps that accompanied the claims of the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China in the South China Sea. The contested area includes the Paracel Islands, the Spratly Islands, the Pratas Island and the Vereker Banks, the Macclesfield Bank, and the Scarborough Shoal. Certain places have undergone land reclamation by the PRC, ROC, and Vietnam. The People's Daily of the PRC uses the term Duànxùxiàn (断续线) or Nánhǎi Duànxùxiàn, while the ROC government uses the term Shíyīduàn xiàn.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South China Sea Arbitration</span> 2016 international arbitration case

The South China Sea Arbitration was an arbitration case brought by the Republic of the Philippines against the People's Republic of China (PRC) under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning certain issues in the South China Sea, including the nine-dash line introduced by the mainland-based Republic of China since as early as 1947. A tribunal of arbitrators appointed the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as the registry for the proceedings.

Roberto Córdova was a Mexican jurist, international judge, and diplomat. Córdova served as a judge for the International Court of Justice (ICJ) between 1955 and 1964. He was the second Mexican to serve as an ICJ judge, following Isidro Fabela.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paris Arbitral Award</span> 1899 international arbitration decision

The Paris Arbitral Award is an arbitral award issued on 3 October 1899 by an arbitral tribunal convened in Paris, created two years earlier as established in the Arbitral Treaty of Washington D. C. on 2 February 1897, in which the United States on the one hand and the United Kingdom on the other, had agreed to submit to international arbitration the dispute over the border to the west of the British colony and the east of independent Venezuela, as a mechanism for an amicable solution to the territorial differendum.

References

  1. ↑ Victor-Emmanuel III (1932). "Sentence arbitrale au sujet du différend relative à la Souveraineté sur l'île de Clipperton". Revue générale de droit international public (in French). 3rd Series (VI): 129–132.
  2. ↑ Vittorio Emanule III (1932). "Laudo arbitral del rey de Italia Víctor Manuel III, sobre la soberanía sobre la Isla de Clipperton (o Isla de la Pasión) entre los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y la República Francesa" (PDF). Gobierno de México.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Victor Emmanuel III (April 1932). "Arbitral Award on the Subject of the Difference Relative to the Sovereignty Over Clipperton Island". American Journal of International Law. 26 (2): 390–394. doi:10.2307/2189369. ISSN   0002-9300. JSTOR   2189369. S2CID   246005364.
  4. 1 2 Dickinson, Edwin D. (1933). "The Clipperton Island Case". American Journal of International Law . 27 (1): 130–133. doi:10.2307/2189797. ISSN   0002-9300. JSTOR   2189797. S2CID   147177707. Archived from the original on 10 April 2023. Retrieved 2023-12-28.
  5. 1 2 Smith, Mark A. (1977). "Sovereignty Over Unoccupied Territories—The Western Sahara Decision". Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law . 9 (1): 135–159. Archived from the original on 16 July 2022. Retrieved 2023-12-28.
  6. ↑ Teall, J. J. H. (1898). "A Phosphatized Trachyte from Clipperton Atoll (Northern Pacific)". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society. 54 (1–4): 230–233. doi:10.1144/GSL.JGS.1898.054.01-04.20. ISSN   0370-291X. S2CID   129862014.
  7. ↑ Goldberg, Walter M. (2018), "Pacific Islands and the Politics of Fertilizer", The Geography, Nature and History of the Tropical Pacific and its Islands, World Regional Geography Book Series, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133–155, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69532-7_6, ISBN   978-3-319-69531-0 , retrieved 2023-12-31
  8. ↑ "Mysterious Island in the Pacific". Otago Daily Times. Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand. October 15, 1898. p. 3.
  9. 1 2 Myhre, Jeffrey D. (1986). The Antarctic Treaty system : politics, law, and diplomacy (1st ed.). Boulder, Colorado, United States of America: Westview Press. pp. 8–9.
  10. ↑ "Empire of France!". The Pacific Commercial Advertiser. Honolulu, Hawaii. 15 Jan 1859. Archived from the original on 27 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  11. ↑ Pardon, Daniel (2020-05-15). "1858 : Napoléon III déclenche la guerre des drapeaux à Clipperton" [1858: Napoleon III launches the War of the Flags at Clipperton]. Tahiti Infos (in French). Archived from the original on 1 June 2023. Retrieved 2023-06-01.
  12. ↑ Derrig, Ríán (2021), "Was Rockall Conquered? An Application of the Law of Territory to a Rock in the North Atlantic Ocean", Bliainiris Éireannach an Dlí IdirnáisiúntaThe Irish Yearbook of International Law, Hart Publishing, p. 65, doi:10.5040/9781509950904.0007, ISBN   978-1-5099-5087-4, S2CID   237982783 , retrieved 2023-12-31
  13. ↑ Remiro Brótons, Antonio (2015-01-01), del Castillo, Lilian (ed.), "19 About the Islands", Law of the Sea, From Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Brill | Nijhoff, pp. 318–336, doi:10.1163/9789004283787_020, ISBN   978-90-04-28378-7 , retrieved 2024-01-06
  14. ↑ Arnaud, Gabriela (2015). Clipperton, Una Historia de Honor y Gloria[Clipperton, A History of Honour and Glory] (in Spanish). Mexico: Bubok Editorial. ISBN   978-84-686-8274-7.
  15. ↑ "About Clipperton Island". ClippertonProject.com. The Clipperton Project. 2014. Archived from the original on 17 January 2014. Retrieved 11 January 2018.
  16. ↑ Aldrich, Robert; Connell, John (1992). France's overseas frontier: départements et territoires d'outre-mer (1st ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 43. ISBN   978-0-521-39061-3.
  17. ↑ Jean-Baptiste, Philippe; Fourré, Elise; Charlou, Jean-Luc; Donval, Jean-Pierre; Corrège, Thierry (2009). "Gaining insight into Clipperton's lagoon hydrology using tritium". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science . 83 (1): 39–46. Bibcode:2009ECSS...83...39J. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2009.03.017. S2CID   42281088. Archived from the original on 13 February 2020. Retrieved 1 April 2023.
  18. ↑ Crothers, R.A., ed. (1917-08-09). "Ten More Saved From Island Plague". San Francisco Bulletin. Vol. 124, no. 106. San Francisco, California, United States of America. Associated Press. p. 10.
  19. ↑ Hight, G.T., ed. (1918-02-14). "Tales of Horror Rivals Fiction". The Bristow Enterprise. Vol. 17, no. 39. Bristow, Nebraska, United States of America. p. 8.
  20. 1 2 McConnell, WH (1970). "The Legal Regime of Archipelagoes". Saskatchewan Law Review. 35 (2). Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  21. ↑ "ITALY: Clipperton Island". Time. 1931-02-16. Retrieved 2024-01-06.
  22. ↑ Evans, Malcolm D.; Lewis, Reece (2023). Islands, law and context: the treatment of islands in international law. Elgar international law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN   978-1-80220-763-7.
  23. 1 2 Schwarzenberger, Georg (1957). "Title to Territory: Response to a Challenge". American Journal of International Law. 51 (2): 308–324. doi:10.2307/2195709. ISSN   0002-9300. JSTOR   2195709. S2CID   147070225.
  24. ↑ Pope Alexander VI (25 September 1493). Dudum siquidem  (in Latin) – via Wikisource.
  25. ↑ Usuki, Eiichi (2021). "Japan's Claim to Takeshima". In Huth, Paul K.; Kim, Sunwoong; Roehrig, Terence (eds.). The Dokdo/Takeshima dispute: South Korea, Japan and the search for a peaceful solution. Maritime Cooperation in East Asia (1st ed.). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff. p. 94. ISBN   978-90-04-44789-9.
  26. ↑ Arias, Juan de Dios; Olavarría y Ferrari, Enrique de (1880) tomo IV page 392 (in Spanish)
  27. ↑ Robertson, William Spence (1918). "The Recognition of the Spanish Colonies by the Motherland". The Hispanic American Historical Review. 1 (1): 70–91. doi:10.2307/2506014. JSTOR   2506014.
  28. ↑ Van Dyke, Jon M. (1982). "Uninhabited Islands: Their Impact on the Ownership of the Oceans' Resources". Ocean Development and International Law. 12: 265.
  29. ↑ Buderi, Charles L.O.; Ricart, Luciana T. (2018-05-15). "The Early Seventeenth Century to the End of the Eighteenth Century: Were the Islands Still Terra Nullius?". The Iran-UAE Gulf Islands Dispute: A Journey Through International Law, History and Politics. Queen Mary Studies in International Law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff (published 2018). doi:10.1163/9789004236196_006. ISBN   978-90-04-23618-9.
  30. ↑ Tray, Kevin (2008). "Fear and Loathing in the South Pole: The Need to Resolve the Antarctic Sovereignty Issue and a Framework for Doing It". Temple International & Comparative Law Journal. 22: 213.
  31. ↑ Heydte, Friedrich August Freiherr Von Der (1935). "Discovery, Symbolic Annexation and Virtual Effectiveness in International Law". American Journal of International Law. 29 (3): 448–471. doi:10.2307/2190420. ISSN   0002-9300. JSTOR   2190420. S2CID   147097044.
  32. ↑ Dugard, John (1999). International law : a South African perspective (2nd ed.). Cape Town, Republic of South Africa: JUTA Law. p. 118.
  33. 1 2 Dixon, Martin (2013). Textbook on International Law (7th ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN   978-0-19-957445-2.
  34. ↑ Head, Ivan (1963). "Canadian Claims to Territorial Sovereignty in the Arctic Regions". McGill Law Journal. 9 (3).
  35. ↑ Ma, Xuechan (2017). "Historic Title Over Land and Maritime Territory". The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies. 4 (1): 31–46. ISSN   2288-6834. JSTOR   26664141.
  36. ↑ Johnson, Eric (1976). "Quick, before it Melts: Toward a Resolution of the Jurisdictional Morass in Antarctica". Cornell International Law Journal. 10 (1).
  37. ↑ Scott, Shirley V. (2021). "The Irrelevance of Non-recognition to Australia's Antarctic Territory Title". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 70 (2): 491–503. doi: 10.1017/S0020589321000051 . hdl: 1959.4/unsworks_75052 . ISSN   0020-5893.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.