Codentify

Last updated

Codentify is the name of a product serialization system developed and patented back in 2005 by Philip Morris International (PMI) for the verification of authenticity and production volume, as well as supply chain control of tobacco products. In the production process, each cigarette package is marked with a unique visible code (also called “Codentify”), that allows authenticating the code against a central server. [1] [2]

Contents

In November 2010, PMI licensed this technology to its three main competitors, namely British American Tobacco (BAT), Imperial Tobacco Group (ITG), and Japan Tobacco International (JTI), and the four companies together formed the Digital Coding and Tracking Association (DCTA) which works to promote the system in order to replace governmental revenue stamps. [3] Codentify was branded by its inventors as a “track & trace and product authentication technology”. [1]

History

In July 2004, Phillip Morris International and the European Union had settled a 12-year-long legal dispute concerning cigarette smuggling allegations. PMI agreed to pay 1.25 Billion USD to the EU budget and its member states. In addition, PMI was legally obligated to mark its products with trackable serial codes. [4] [5] [6] Agreements were subsequently signed with the other three major tobacco companies.

PMI's affiliate company, Philip Morris Products S.A. created and patented the Codentify system in 2005.

In late 2010, PMI licensed Codentify technology to its main competitors BAT, JTI, and ITG free of charge. [3] The four companies, which together account for 71% of global cigarette sales (excluding China), agreed to use the PMI-developed system on all of their products to ensure “the adoption of a single industry standard, based on Codentify.” [7] The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) immediately voiced concerns that “Codentify should never be used for tracking and tracing purposes as tracking and tracing provisions should be implemented under the strict control and management of governments.” [8]

In 2011, the four companies formed the Digital Coding and Tracking Association (DCTA) to promote international standards and digital technologies to help governments fight smuggling, counterfeiting, and tax evasion. The association was officially launched in 2013. [9]

According to the DCTA, around 12% of the global cigarette market is illicit, depriving national governments of more than US$40 billion a year in lost tax revenues [10] and some say this is a serious underestimate. [11] [12] The agreements between the EU and the four major tobacco companies aim to stem the illicit trade of cigarettes, but some academics and the anti-tobacco movement have criticized it as a wholly inadequate deterrent. [13] [14] The EU has since not renewed this deal after MEPs complained that it was inappropriate for governments and tobacco companies to have such a deal. [15]

Inexto

In June 2016 the DCTA announced that it transferred Codentify to Inexto, an affiliate of the French Group Impala. [16] This was criticized by leading industry watchdogs such as the FCTC and academics such as Anna Gilmore, who is the director of the tobacco control research group at the University of Bath. She said that “Inexto could not be considered sufficiently independent from the tobacco industry". Martyn Day, Scottish National Party Member of Parliament, says while Codentify was sold "the new owner is merely a front company and that the system is still under the effective control of the tobacco firms". [17] Other academics such as Luk Joossens, who is the advocacy officer of the Association of European Cancer Leagues, said the sale was “predictable” and that tobacco companies will now “pretend” that Codentify is no longer part of the tobacco industry. [18] PMI have rebutted that “Inexto is fully independent from the tobacco industry." [19]

Technology

The Codentify system is based on a machine-created, unique, human-readable multi-digit alphanumeric code that is printed directly onto every individual product during the manufacturing process. [20] A double key encryption system, with separate central authority level and factory level encryption keys are stored on a respective server, allows for factory line production of a pre-defined number of Codentify codes that have been authorized by a central (e.g.: government) server. [3]

The system-generated 12-digit variant of the code is described as pseudo-random, offering 3412 possible combinations. Data that is unique and attributed to each discrete item (product) is encrypted into the code such as the date and exact time of manufacture, machine count of the item, specific machine line of manufacture, brand, variant, pack size, pack type, destination market, and price. [20]

Critics of this system have argued that this approach only allows for the verification of the code itself and not of the product the code is printed on; thereby leaving the potential for copying. [2] A European Commission Assessment Report into Tracking and Tracing notes in section 5.1.2 that in addition to the Codentify code being easily copied, it also fails to link the cigarette packets to the master cases. [21]

However, this critique fails to recognize that the system does allow for the recognition of copied codes when an illegitimate copy is queried. The system logic leverages geo-positioning data and will recognize if a code has been previously queried to highlight and notify that the item is suspect. Illegitimate products are invariably developed and replicated in significant numbers from a legitimate example. Once the system logic recognizes illegitimate code, it is able to notify the system authority that this code has been compromised and is no longer valid. Due to the pseudo-random encrypted design of Codentify, illegitimate parties cannot predict codes and therefore can either default to replication of one legitimate code, which the system will logically identify from duplicate queries and provide notification, or the generation of random illegitimate codes, which the system will immediately recognize. Given the geo-positioning data at the time of query, both illegitimate approaches provide legitimate authorities with important data on the suspect supply chain.[ citation needed ]

Furthermore, when the Codentify technology is coupled with aggregated data (parent-child packaging) and supply chain event tracking, the ability of the system to identify a suspect query is thereafter immediate. In essence, supply chain event tracking along the legitimate supply chain generates additional data encompassing that legitimate product’s specific provenance. Provenance that the illicit supply chain cannot replicate.[ citation needed ]

Criticism

Codentify has been the subject of harsh criticism as a tobacco industry-promoted system that is aimed at undermining public health efforts and is not capable of curbing the illicit trade of cigarettes. [22] This criticism has come from some academics and pro-health groups, [2] to include the WHO. [23]

The WHO FCTC Protocol on the Elimination of the Illicit Trade in Tobacco products states in article 8, section 12 that tobacco tracking and regulation “shall not be performed by or delegated to the tobacco industry”. [24] [25] Today, the Codentify technology is under totally independent ownership and management, having no capitalistic or governance link to the tobacco industry, with application of a successor product (INEXTOR) that is now present across multiple industries outside of tobacco, to include beer, fine spirits, luxury goods, automotive parts, and pharmaceuticals.[ citation needed ]

Critics of the tobacco industry say Codentify is simply not good enough, “because it focuses too much on production and does not store product codes or track them.” [2] [26] However, the Codentify system does not require the storage of codes in the clear for security purposes (though it is capable to perform this task if specified by the central authority), as such mass storage of legitimate codes exposes them to potential compromise.[ citation needed ] The Codentify technology uses decryption processes to deliver authentication and validation of an item and is able to provide the item’s descriptive and unique attributes in parallel, with a near-instant response time.[ citation needed ]

Heavy criticism has also been launched at the factory-level keys the system uses to provide unique verification codes for the product. Since these secret keys are stored on company and government servers, abuse of privileges on this level would allow criminals to generate additional codes, which would appear to be genuine to the system. [2] [27] However, this criticism does not take into account that the central server keys are not shared with the manufacturer nor does it account for the dynamic and static key multi-level encryption method designed into the system, which jointly provide the legitimate authority with complete and secure control over the code authorization process.[ citation needed ]

The decentralized nature of the system the realities of imperfect connectivity across complex, cross-border supply chains by ensuring a central control and oversight of secure code generation within production environments whilst providing legitimate manufacturing assets continuity of production under parameters dictated by the central authority. [ citation needed ]

Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) described the system as a black box created by the tobacco industry that uses unsecured equipment that is vulnerable to code recycling. [28] However, this criticism does not take into account that: (i) codes can only be legitimized by the central authority server, (ii) the algorithm and both static and dynamic keys remain secret to and under strict control of the central authority, (iii) the method applied in the generation of the codes is patented and therefore visible by the public. Under this strict control regime, illegitimate creation of codes is not possible.[ citation needed ] Illicit techniques such as “code recycling”, using codes of products rejected in quality control, “code cloning”, printing the same code on multiple products, and “code migration”, reprinting codes used in one country elsewhere, allowing the reuse of genuine codes multiple times, are therefore rendered obsolete and defeated by this multi-layer encryption method.[ citation needed ]

Philip Morris has been accused, via its South American subsidiary Massalin Particulares, of using bribery and extortion to implement Codentify and Inexto in Argentina.[ citation needed ]

“The directors, managers, and legal representatives of PMI and its Argentine subsidiary Massalin Particulares S.R.L. (MP) are being investigated within the framework of a criminal case in federal court…,” Attorney Alejandro Sánchez Kalbermatten wrote in a 2017 letter to the Security and Exchange Commission in the United States.[ citation needed ]

A decision by the Federal Court of Argentina overseeing the case concluded that the plaintiff, Attorney Alejandro Sánchez Kalbermatten, had no standing and that material facts did not substantiate the accusations made in the complaint. As a consequence, the case No.17.766/2016 was fully dismissed on September 28, 2017.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobacco industry</span> Persons and companies that produce tobacco-related products

The tobacco industry comprises those persons and companies who are engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, shipment, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products. It is a global industry; tobacco can grow in any warm, moist environment, which means it can be farmed on all continents except Antarctica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Tobacco</span> Collective term for the largest global tobacco companies

Big Tobacco is a name used to refer to the largest companies in the tobacco industry. According to the World Medical Journal, the five largest tobacco companies are: Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco, Imperial Brands, Japan Tobacco International, and China National Tobacco Company. These companies have substantial power economically, with revenues matching some small countries. These companies are well-known for lobbying governments, advocating for looser restrictions and lower taxes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control</span>

The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is a treaty adopted by the 56th World Health Assembly held in Geneva, Switzerland on 21 May 2003. It became the first World Health Organization treaty adopted under article 19 of the WHO constitution. The treaty came into force on 27 February 2005. It had been signed by 168 countries and is legally binding in 182 ratifying countries. There are currently 14 United Nations member states that are non-parties to the treaty.

Philip Morris USA is the American tobacco division of the American tobacco corporation Altria Group. It has been the leading cigarette manufacturer in the U.S. since the late 20th century. It was incorporated in New York City in 1902 as Philip Morris & Co. Ltd. In 1919 George J. Whelan, along with fellow shareholders Reuben M. Ellis and Leonard B. McKitterick, acquired the American division of the company and created Philip Morris & Co. Ltd., Inc. In the 1950s it introduced innovations such as the flip-top box and filters for cigarettes. In 1972 it became the leading cigarette manufacturer in the United States in terms of sales, a position it continued to hold. Today its major brands include Marlboro, Virginia Slims, Benson & Hedges, Merit, Parliament, and others. In March 2008, Philip Morris International was split from Philip Morris USA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicotine marketing</span> Marketing technique

Nicotine marketing is the marketing of nicotine-containing products or use. Traditionally, the tobacco industry markets cigarette smoking, but it is increasingly marketing other products, such as electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products. Products are marketed through social media, stealth marketing, mass media, and sponsorship. Expenditures on nicotine marketing are in the tens of billions a year; in the US alone, spending was over US$1 million per hour in 2016; in 2003, per-capita marketing spending was $290 per adult smoker, or $45 per inhabitant. Nicotine marketing is increasingly regulated; some forms of nicotine advertising are banned in many countries. The World Health Organization recommends a complete tobacco advertising ban.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip Morris International</span> Multinational tobacco company

Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI) is an American multinational tobacco company, with products sold in over 180 countries. The most recognized and best selling product of the company is Marlboro. Philip Morris International is often referred to as one of the companies comprising Big Tobacco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobacco politics</span> Politics surrounding the use and distribution of tobacco

Tobacco politics refers to the politics surrounding the use and distribution of tobacco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobacco control</span> Field of health science

Tobacco control is a field of international public health science, policy and practice dedicated to addressing tobacco use and thereby reducing the morbidity and mortality it causes. Since most cigarettes and cigars and hookahs contain/use tobacco, tobacco control also concerns these. E-cigarettes do not contain tobacco itself, but (often) do contain nicotine. Tobacco control is a priority area for the World Health Organization (WHO), through the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. References to a tobacco control movement may have either positive or negative connotations, depending upon the commentator.

About a quarter of adults in Turkey smoke. Smoking in Turkey is banned in government offices, workplaces, bars, restaurants, cafés, shopping malls, schools, hospitals, and all forms of public transport, including trains, taxis and ferries. Turkey's smoking ban includes provisions for violators, where anyone caught smoking in a designated smoke-free area faces a fine of 188 Turkish lira (~€9.29/$9.90/£8.22) and bar owners who fail to enforce the ban could be fined from 560 liras for a first offence up to 5,600 liras. The laws are enforced by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plain tobacco packaging</span> Legally mandated packaging of tobacco products without any brand imagery

Plain tobacco packaging, also known as generic, neutral, standardised or homogeneous packaging, is packaging of tobacco products, typically cigarettes, without any branding, including only the brand name in a mandated size, font and place on the pack, in addition to the health warnings and any other legally mandated information such as toxic constituents and tax-paid stamps. The appearance of all tobacco packs is standardised, including the colour of the pack.

<i>Philip Morris v. Uruguay</i> Arbitration case on smoking regulations

The Philip Morris v. Uruguay case was an investor-state dispute settlement case initiated on 19 February 2010 and concluded on 8 July 2016, in which the multinational tobacco company Philip Morris International (PMI), whose head office is located in Lausanne, lodged a complaint against Uruguay that was resolved by international arbitration under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illicit cigarette trade</span> Trade in tobacco goods which fail to comply with legislation

The illicit cigarette trade is defined as "the production, import, export, purchase, sale, or possession of tobacco goods which fail to comply with legislation". Illicit cigarette trade activities fall under 3 categories:

  1. Contraband: cigarettes smuggled from abroad without domestic duty paid;
  2. Counterfeit: cigarettes manufactured without authorization of the rightful owners, with intent to deceive consumers and to avoid paying duty;
  3. Illicit whites: brands manufactured legitimately in one country, but smuggled and sold in another without duties being paid.

The Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products is a 2012 World Health Organization treaty, designed to combat the worldwide illicit tobacco trade. The Protocol is supplementary to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mighty Corporation</span> Tobacco company in the Philippines

Mighty Corporation is a Filipino corporation and was the second largest cigarette manufacturer in the Philippines from 2010 to 2017. On September 8, 2017, Japan Tobacco acquired Mighty Corporation's cigarette business in the amount of ₱46.8 billion, paving the way for the full payment of ₱30 billion to the Philippine government as part of the agreement for Mighty Corporation to settle its unpaid tax liabilities.

"Tobacco" is a segment of the HBO news satire television series Last Week Tonight with John Oliver about the tobacco industry. It first aired on February 15, 2015, as part of the second episode of the series' second season. During the eighteen-minute segment, comedian John Oliver discusses tobacco industry trends and practices.

A heated tobacco product (HTP) is a tobacco product that heats the tobacco at a lower temperature than conventional cigarettes. These products contain nicotine, which is a highly addictive chemical. The heat generates an aerosol or smoke to be inhaled from the tobacco, which contains nicotine and other chemicals. HTPs may also contain additives not found in tobacco, including flavoring chemicals. HTPs generally heat tobacco to temperatures under 600 °C (1100 °F), a lower temperature than conventional cigarettes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iqos</span> Heated tobacco products by Philip Morris International

Iqos is a line of heated tobacco and electronic cigarette products manufactured by Philip Morris International (PMI). It was first introduced in November 2014 in Japan and Italy. Most of the IQOS products are devices that heat tobacco without burning it.

The Foundation for a Smoke-Free World is an organization focused on smoking harm reduction founded in 2017. It is funded by Philip Morris International (PMI), which had initial plans for $80 million in annual funding. The current pledge agreement from PMI to the Foundation, modified in September 2020, promises $35 million in funding to the Foundation from 2022 through 2029.

The composition of the emissions generated from heated tobacco products are generally lower than that found in cigarette smoke. This is due to the comparatively low temperatures, the filter systems, and physical design. The composition of what is produced is complex. The main toxicants found in the emissions of cigarette smoke are also found in the emissions of these products in varying concentrations. The aerosol generated contains levels of nicotine and cancer-causing chemicals that are comparable to regular cigarettes. The emissions contained 84% of the nicotine found in regular cigarettes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Veev</span> Electronic cigarette brand

Veev is a brand of electronic cigarettes manufactured by Philip Morris International (PMI).

References

  1. 1 2 "Codentify E Brochure" (PDF). Pmi.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-28. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Joossens, Luk; Gilmore, Anna B. (2013-03-12). "The transnational tobacco companies' strategy to promote Codentify, their inadequate tracking and tracing standard". Tobacco Control. 23 (e1): tobaccocontrol–2012–050796. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796. ISSN   1468-3318. PMC   3897562 . PMID   23481904.
  3. 1 2 3 "Does the tobacco industry have a tracking and tracing system that governments can use?" (PDF). World No Tobacco Day 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-10-27. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  4. Tran, Mark (2004-07-09). "Philip Morris reaches $1.25bn EU agreement". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  5. "European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - European Commission and Philip Morris International sign 12-year Agreement to combat contraband and counterfeit cigarettes". europa.eu. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  6. Madeleine Heyward LL.M. (New York). "Legal analysis of the agreements between the European Union, Member States, and multinational tobacco companies". Fctc.org. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  7. Hill M. "Digital Tax Verification (DTV) Codentify, The industry Standard, October 2010 and Philip Morris International, Codentify, Brochure, 2012" (PDF). Pmi.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-28. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  8. "Framework Convention Alliance Bulletin". Fctc.org. Archived from the original on 2016-10-27. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  9. "Association launched to fight illicit trade in excisable goods". MarketWatch. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  10. "Tobacco: where volume counts". AIT Central: fighting illicit trade.
  11. "Illicit Tobacco: What is the Tobacco Industry Trying to Do?" (PDF). Ash.org.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-10-02. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  12. Gilmore, Anna B.; Rowell, Andy; Gallus, Silvano; Lugo, Alessandra; Joossens, Luk; Sims, Michelle (2014). "Towards a greater understanding of the illicit tobacco trade in Europe: A review of the PMI funded 'Project Star' report". Tobacco Control. 23 (e1): e51–e61. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051240. PMC   4078702 . PMID   24335339.
  13. Joossens, L.; Gilmore, A. B.; Stoklosa, M.; Ross, H. (2016). "Assessment of the European Union's illicit trade agreements with the four major Transnational Tobacco Companies | Tobacco Control". Tobacco Control. 25 (3): 254–260. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052218. PMC   4853556 . PMID   26022741 . Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  14. "Tobacco smuggling - European Commission". Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  15. "EU to end anti-tobacco smuggling deal with Philip Morris". Financial Times. 5 July 2016. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  16. "DCTA technology ownership transferred to Inexto, an affiliate of Impala Group" (PDF). Dcta-global.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-07. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  17. "Christmas Adjournment - Hansard Online". hansard.parliament.uk. Retrieved 2017-02-28.
  18. Saturday 4th Mar 2017 (2016-06-01). "Big Tobacco suspected of dodging EU anti-smuggling rules". Euobserver.com. Retrieved 2017-03-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  19. "Pharmalutions Pte Ltd" (PDF). Tobacco.cleartheair.org.hk. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  20. 1 2 "Digital Tax Verification". Iticnet.org. Archived from the original on 2016-10-27. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  21. "Analysis and Feasibility Assessment Regarding EU systems for Tracking and Tracing of Tobacco Products and for Security Features" (PDF). Ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  22. "Condentify: an industry attempt to control illicit trade" (PDF). Corporate Accountability International. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-13. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  23. "Dr Vera Luiza da Costa e Silva, head of the Convention Secretariat, sends her remarks to the High-Level Conference: Combating tobacco industry tactics: state of play and a way forward, European Parliament, Brussels, 2 March 2016". World Health Organization. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  24. "Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products" (PDF). Apps.who.int. Retrieved 2017-03-04.
  25. whyitsbad (2016-02-29). "World Health Organization is the Solution for Codentify". Why It's Bad. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  26. Geller, Martinne. "Big Tobacco squares up as EU rules aim to track every cigarette". Reuters UK. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  27. "Major Flaws Discovered in the Codentify Track and Trace System". Tobacco Industry facts. Archived from the original on 2016-10-27. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
  28. "Codentify_final" (PDF).