Cognitive warfare

Last updated

Cognitive warfare (CW) consists of any military activities designed to affect attitudes and behaviours, by influencing, protecting, or disrupting individual, group, or population level cognition. [1] [2] It is an extension of information warfare using propaganda and disinformation. [1]

Contents

NATO General Paolo Ruggiero distinguishes it from other information-related activities by its objectives: "Its goal is not what individuals think, but rather, the way they think." [3] [ better source needed ] Exponents of cognitive warfare aim to influence human thought, reasoning, sense-making, decision-making, and behaviour, through the manipulation of information and use of machine learning structures which distribute information on the internet. [1] Other methods of cognitive warfare include the targeted use of inaudible sound waves (frequency of <20 Hz) and microwaves to incapacitate enemy forces by disrupting the neurological functions of human targets without causing visible injury. [4] [5] [6] According to the U.S. National Institute of Health, infrasound’s effect on the human inner ear includes “vertigo, imbalance, intolerable sensations, incapacitation, disorientation, nausea, vomiting, and bowel spasm; and resonances in inner organs, such as the heart." [4] [5]

Comparison of cognitive warfare with information warfare

According to Masakowski, cognitive warfare is an extension of information warfare (IW). [1] [ better source needed ] Operations in the information environment are traditionally conducted in five core capabilities - electronic warfare (EW), psychological operations (PSYOPs), military deception (MILDEC), operational security (OPSEC), and computer network operations (CNO). [3] [7] Information warfare aims at controlling the flow of information in support of traditional military objectives, mainly to produce lethal effects on the battlefield. [3] [ better source needed ] According to Masakowski & NATO Gen Ruggiero, cognitive warfare degrades the capacity to know and produce foreknowledge, transforming the understanding and interpretations of situations by individuals and in the mass consciousness, and has multiple agnostic applications including commercial, political and covert IW and CW military operations. [1] [3] The Chinese military refers to operations in the cognitive domain as 'cognitive domain operations (CDO)'. [8]

Cognitive warfare and data

Using a psychological and psychographic profile, an influence campaign can be created and adjusted in real time by A.I. ML models until desired cognitive and behaviour affects on the individual and/or population are achieved. [9] [ better source needed ] U.S. Army and Marine Corps counterinsurgency strategy calls for the use of automated biometric systems to separate insurgents and foreign fighters from the general population. [10] In doing so, this helps counterinsurgents leverage the population and operational environment against the threat network. [10]

Decades of peer-reviewed research show that echo chambers, in the physical world and online, cause political polarization, [11] extremism, confusion, cognitive dissonance, negative emotional responses (e.g. anger and fear), reactance, microaggressions, and third-person effects. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [ excessive citations ][ verification needed ]

And because of these psychological perseverance mechanisms like confirmation bias, this can be very problematic based on the work of Nyhan & Reifler (2010). Nyhan & Reifler found that even attempting to correct false beliefs often reinforces rather than dispels these beliefs among those who hold them most strongly. This is known as the backfire effect – "in which corrections actually increase misperceptions." [25] [26] [27] [28]

Objectives and downstream effects

According to Masakowski, the objectives of cognitive warfare are to shape/control and enemy's cognitive thinking and decision-making; to manipulate and degrade a nation's values, emotions, national spirit, cultural traditions, historical beliefs, political will; to achieve adversarial strategic geopolitical objectives without fighting; to influence human/societal reasoning, thinking, emotions, et al. aligned with specific objectives; and to degrade a populations trust in their institutions. [1] [ verification needed ][ better source needed ] In doing so, Masakowski claims that this allows for the weakening/distruption of military, political & societal cohesion; and undermining/threatening of democracy. [1] [ verification needed ][ better source needed ] Masakowski alleges that cognitive warfare has also been used by authoritarian societies to restructure society and groom populations to accept "continuous surveillance" and that this allows these authoritarian societies to "remove individuals/outliers who resist and insist on freedom of speech, independent thinking, etc." [1] [ verification needed ][ better source needed ]

Related Research Articles

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values. People display this bias when they select information that supports their views, ignoring contrary information, or when they interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing attitudes. The effect is strongest for desired outcomes, for emotionally charged issues, and for deeply entrenched beliefs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electronic warfare</span> Combat involving electronics and directed energy

Electromagnetic warfare or electronic warfare (EW) is warfare involving the use of the electromagnetic spectrum or directed energy to control the spectrum, attack an enemy, or impede enemy operations. The purpose of electromagnetic warfare is to deny the opponent the advantage of—and ensure friendly unimpeded access to—the EM spectrum. Electromagnetic warfare can be applied from air, sea, land, or space by crewed and uncrewed systems, and can target communication, radar, or other military and civilian assets.

Military doctrine is the expression of how military forces contribute to campaigns, major operations, battles, and engagements. A military doctrine outlines what military means should be used, how forces should be structured, where forces should be deployed, and the modes of cooperation between types of forces. "Joint doctrine" refers to the doctrines shared and aligned by multinational forces or joint service operations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Psychological warfare</span> Information operations to assist military objectives

Psychological warfare (PSYWAR), or the basic aspects of modern psychological operations (PsyOp), has been known by many other names or terms, including Military Information Support Operations (MISO), Psy Ops, political warfare, "Hearts and Minds", and propaganda. The term is used "to denote any action which is practiced mainly by psychological methods with the aim of evoking a planned psychological reaction in other people".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military intelligence</span> Information about military opponents

Military intelligence is a military discipline that uses information collection and analysis approaches to provide guidance and direction to assist commanders in their decisions. This aim is achieved by providing an assessment of data from a range of sources, directed towards the commanders' mission requirements or responding to questions as part of operational or campaign planning. To provide an analysis, the commander's information requirements are first identified, which are then incorporated into intelligence collection, analysis, and dissemination.

A debunker is a person or organization that exposes or discredits claims believed to be false, exaggerated, or pretentious. The term is often associated with skeptical investigation of controversial topics such as UFOs, claimed paranormal phenomena, cryptids, conspiracy theories, alternative medicine, religion, exploratory or fringe areas of scientific, or pseudoscientific research.

Fact-checking is the process of verifying the factual accuracy of questioned reporting and statements. Fact-checking can be conducted before or after the text or content is published or otherwise disseminated. Internal fact-checking is such checking done in-house by the publisher to prevent inaccurate content from being published; when the text is analyzed by a third party, the process is called external fact-checking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cass Sunstein</span> American legal scholar, writer, blogger (born 1954)

Cass Robert Sunstein is an American legal scholar known for his work in constitutional law, administrative law, environmental law, and behavioral economics. He is also The New York Times best-selling author of The World According to Star Wars (2016) and Nudge (2008). He was the administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration from 2009 to 2012.

Network-centric warfare, also called network-centric operations or net-centric warfare, is a military doctrine or theory of war that aims to translate an information advantage, enabled partly by information technology, into a competitive advantage through the computer networking of dispersed forces. It was pioneered by the United States Department of Defense in the 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Counterinsurgency</span> Military operation aimed at defeating insurgent forces

Counterinsurgency is "the totality of actions aimed at defeating irregular forces". The Oxford English Dictionary defines counterinsurgency as any "military or political action taken against the activities of guerrillas or revolutionaries" and can be considered war by a state against a non-state adversary. Insurgency and counterinsurgency campaigns have been waged since ancient history. However, modern thinking on counterinsurgency was developed during decolonization.

Strategic communication can mean either communicating a concept, a process, or data that satisfies a long-term strategic goal of an organization by allowing the facilitation of advanced planning or communicating over long distances, usually using international telecommunications or dedicated global network assets to coordinate actions and activities of operationally significant commercial, non-commercial, and military business or combat and logistic subunits. It can also mean the related function within an organization, which handles internal and external communication processes. Strategic communication can also be used for political warfare.

Battlespace or battle-space is a term used to signify a military strategy which integrates multiple armed forces for the military theatre of operations, including air, information, land, sea, cyber and outer space to achieve military goals. It includes the environment, timeframe and other factors, and conditions that must be understood to successfully apply combat power, protect the force, or complete the mission. This includes enemy and friendly armed forces, infrastructure, weather, terrain, and the electromagnetic spectrum within the operational areas and areas of interest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Command and control</span> Military exercise of authority by a commanding officer over assigned forces

Command and control is a "set of organizational and technical attributes and processes ... [that] employs human, physical, and information resources to solve problems and accomplish missions" to achieve the goals of an organization or enterprise, according to a 2015 definition by military scientists Marius Vassiliou, David S. Alberts, and Jonathan R. Agre. The term often refers to a military system.

Brendan Nyhan is an American political scientist and professor at Dartmouth College. He is also a liberal to moderate political blogger, author, and political columnist. He was born in Mountain View, California and now lives in Hanover, New Hampshire.

Selective exposure is a theory within the practice of psychology, often used in media and communication research, that historically refers to individuals' tendency to favor information which reinforces their pre-existing views while avoiding contradictory information. Selective exposure has also been known and defined as "congeniality bias" or "confirmation bias" in various texts throughout the years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Echo chamber (media)</span> Situation that reinforces beliefs by repetition inside a closed system

In news media and social media, an echo chamber is an environment or ecosystem in which participants encounter beliefs that amplify or reinforce their preexisting beliefs by communication and repetition inside a closed system and insulated from rebuttal. An echo chamber circulates existing views without encountering opposing views, potentially resulting in confirmation bias. Echo chambers may increase social and political polarization and extremism. On social media, it is thought that echo chambers limit exposure to diverse perspectives, and favor and reinforce presupposed narratives and ideologies.

Hybrid warfare was defined by Frank Hoffman in 2007 as the emerging simultaneous use of multiple types of warfare by flexible and sophisticated adversaries who understand that successful conflict requires a variety of forms designed to fit the goals at the time. A US document on maritime strategy said "Conflicts are increasingly characterized by a hybrid blend of traditional and irregular tactics, decentralized planning and execution, and non-state actors using both simple and sophisticated technologies in innovative ways." While there is no clear, accepted definition, methods include political warfare and blend conventional warfare, irregular warfare, and cyberwarfare with other influencing methods, such as fake news, diplomacy, lawfare, regime change, and foreign electoral intervention. By combining kinetic operations with subversive efforts, the aggressor intends to avoid attribution or retribution. The concept of hybrid warfare has been criticized by a number of academics and practitioners, who say that it is vague and has disputed constitutive elements and historical distortions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political warfare</span> Use of political means to compel an opponent with hostile intent

Political warfare is the use of hostile political means to compel an opponent to do one's will. The term political describes the calculated interaction between a government and a target audience, including another state's government, military, and/or general population. Governments use a variety of techniques to coerce certain actions, thereby gaining relative advantage over an opponent. The techniques include propaganda and psychological operations ("PsyOps"), which service national and military objectives respectively. Propaganda has many aspects and a hostile and coercive political purpose. Psychological operations are for strategic and tactical military objectives and may be intended for hostile military and civilian populations.

Belief perseverance is maintaining a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it.

New physical principles weapons are a wide range of weapons or systems created using emerging technologies, like wave, psychophysical, and genetic weapons.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Masakowski, Yvonne, PhD. (April 11, 2022). "Newport Lecture Series: "Artificial Intelligence & Cognitive Warfare" with Yvonne Masakowski". YouTube .{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. "Cognitive Warfare". NATO's Strategic Warfare Development Command.
  3. 1 2 3 4 ""#RigaStratComDialogue | Strategy Talk by NATO General Paolo Ruggiero"". YouTube .
  4. 1 2 "Infrasound: Brief Review of Toxicological Literature" (PDF). U.S. National Institute of Health. November 2001. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 28, 2024.
  5. 1 2 Mizokami, Kyle (September 25, 2019). "So What Is This Secretive Chinese Sonic Weapon Exactly?". Popular Mechanics.
  6. NATO Commander Grostad (July 13, 2022). "NATO CyCon 2022 DAY 3 Panel: Cognitive Warfare – Hacking the OODA Loop". YouTube .
  7. Wilson, Clay, 'Information Operations, Electronic Warfare, and Cyberwar: Capabilities and Related Policy Issues', LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, 2007 Mar 20
  8. Baughman, Josh. "How China Wins the Cognitive Domain" (PDF).
  9. ""Target Audience Analysis" – Joint Warfare Center" (PDF).
  10. 1 2 "Field Manual 3-24 INSURGENCIES AND COUNTERING INSURGENCIES (MCWP 3-33.5)" (PDF).
  11. Bail, Christopher A.; Argyle, Lisa P.; Brown, Taylor W.; Bumpus, John P.; Chen, Haohan; Hunzaker, M. B. Fallin; Lee, Jaemin; Mann, Marcus; Merhout, Friedolin; Volfovsky, Alexander (September 11, 2018). ""Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization"". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (37): 9216–9221. Bibcode:2018PNAS..115.9216B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804840115 . PMC   6140520 . PMID   30154168.
  12. "Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government" | By: Achen CH, Bartels LM | Princeton Univ Press, Princeton | 2016
  13. "Public Opinion and Policy in the American States" | By: Erikson RS, Wright GC, McIver JP | Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK | 1993
  14. "When  the People  Speak:  Deliberative Democracy  and  Public Consultation" | By: Fishkin  JS | Oxford University Press, Oxford | 2011
  15. "A   new  era   of   minimal  effects?   The   changing foundations of political communication" | J Commun 58:707–731 | By: Bennett   WL,  Iyengar   S | 2008
  16. Sunstein C (2002) Republic.com (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton)
  17. "The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog" | By: Adamic, L., & Glance, N. | 2005, August 21 | Paper presented at the 3th International Workshop on Link Discovery (pp. 36–43), Chicago, IL. New York, NY: ACM
  18. Wollebæk, Dag; Karlsen, Rune; Steen-Johnsen, Kari; Enjolras, Bernard (April 2019). "Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers: The Emotional Basis for Online Behavior". Social Media + Society. 5 (2). doi:10.1177/2056305119829859. hdl: 11250/2597058 .
  19. Del Vicario, Michela; Bessi, Alessandro; Zollo, Fabiana; Petroni, Fabio; Scala, Antonio; Caldarelli, Guido; Stanley, H. Eugene; Quattrociocchi, Walter (December 21, 2015), Echo chambers in the age of misinformation, arXiv: 1509.00189
  20. "Mapping social dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit debate" | By: Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., & Quattrociocchi, W. | 2017 | 'Social Networks,' 50, 6–16.
  21. "The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you" | By: Pariser, E. | 2011 | New York, NY: Penguin Press
  22. ""The Law of Group Polarization" | By: Cass R. Sunstein | John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 91, 1999".
  23. ""Unintended Effects of Public Relations in Strategic Communication: A First Synthesis" | By: Jie Xu | 'Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal', 2019, Vol 20, p1 | ISSN: 1440-4389" (PDF).
  24. Villanova University, USA; Xu, Jie (2020). "Unintended Effects of Advertising: An Updated Qualitative Review". Review of Communication Research. 8: 1–16. doi: 10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.021 (inactive November 1, 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  25. ""When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions" | By: Nyhan Brendan, Reifler Jason | 2010 | Political Behavior 32:303–30". doi:10.1177/2378023116689791.
  26. ""The Backfire Effect" | By: Matthew Wills | April 3, 2017". April 3, 2017.
  27. "A dissonance analysis of the boomerang effect" | By: Cohen, Arthur R. | March 1962 | 'Journal of Personality' 30 (1): 75–88 | Doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02306.x. | PMID 13880221
  28. "Silverman, Craig (June 17, 2011). "The Backfire Effect: More on the press's inability to debunk bad information". Columbia Journalism Review, Columbia University (New York City)".