Microaggression

Last updated

Microaggression is a term used for commonplace verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups. [1] The term was coined by Harvard University psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals which he regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflicting on African Americans. [1] [2] [3] [4] By the early 21st century, use of the term was applied to the casual disparagement of any socially marginalized group, including LGBT people, poor people, and disabled people. [5] Psychologist Derald Wing Sue defines microaggressions as "brief, everyday exchanges that send denigrating messages to certain individuals because of their group membership". The persons making the comments may be otherwise well-intentioned and unaware of the potential impact of their words. [6]

Contents

A number of scholars and social commentators have criticized the concept of microaggression for its lack of a scientific basis, over-reliance on subjective evidence, and promotion of psychological fragility. [7] Critics argue that avoiding behaviors that one interprets as microaggressions restricts one's own freedom and causes emotional self-harm, and that employing authority figures to address microaggressions (i.e. call-out culture) can lead to an atrophy of those skills needed to mediate one's own disputes. [8] Some argue that, because the term "microaggression" uses language connoting violence to describe verbal conduct, it can be abused to exaggerate harm, resulting in retribution and the elevation of victimhood. [9]

D. W. Sue, who popularized the term microaggressions, has expressed doubts on how the concept is being used: "I was concerned that people who use these examples would take them out of context and use them as a punitive rather than an exemplary way." [10] In the 2020 edition of his book with Lisa Spanierman and in a 2021 book with his doctoral students, Dr. Sue introduces the idea of "microinterventions" as potential solutions to acts of microaggression. [11] [12]

Description

Microaggressions are common, everyday slights and comments that relate to various aspects of one's appearance or identity such as class, gender, sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, mother tongue, age, body shape, disability, or religion, among others. [13] They are thought to spring from unconsciously held prejudices and beliefs which may be demonstrated consciously or unconsciously through daily verbal interactions. [14] Although these communications typically appear harmless to observers, they are considered a form of covert racism or everyday discrimination. [15] Microaggressions differ from what Pierce referred to as "macroaggressions", which are more extreme forms of racism (such as lynchings or beatings) due to their ambiguity, size and commonality. [16] Microaggressions are experienced by most stigmatized individuals and occur on a regular basis. These can be particularly stressful for people on the receiving end as they are easily denied by those committing them. They are also harder to detect by members of the dominant culture, [17] as they are often unaware they are causing harm. [18] Sue describes microaggressions as including statements that repeat or affirm stereotypes about the minority group or subtly demean its members.

Race or ethnicity

Social scientists Sue, Bucceri, Lin, Nadal, and Torino (2007) described microaggressions as "the new face of racism", saying that the nature of racism has shifted over time from overt expressions of racial hatred and hate crimes, toward expressions of aversive racism, such as microaggressions, that are more subtle, ambiguous, and often unintentional. Sue says this has led some Americans to believe wrongly that non-white Americans no longer suffer from racism. [19] One example of such subtle expressions of racism is Asian students being either pathologized or penalized as too passive or quiet. [18] An incident that caused controversy at UCLA occurred when a teacher corrected a student's use of "indigenous" in a paper by changing it from upper- to lowercase. [20]

According to Sue et al., [18] microaggressions seem to appear in four forms:

Some psychologists have criticized microaggression theory for assuming that all verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities are due to bias. [21] [22] [23] Thomas Schacht says that it is uncertain whether a behavior is due to racial bias or is a larger phenomenon that occurs regardless of identity conflict. [24] However, Kanter and colleagues found that microaggressions were robustly correlated to five separate measures of bias. [15] In reviewing the microaggression literature, Scott Lilienfeld suggested that microassaults should probably be struck from the taxonomy because the examples provided in the literature tend not to be "micro", but are outright assaults, intimidation, harassment and bigotry; in some cases, examples have included criminal acts. [21] Others have pointed out that what could be perceived as subtle snubs could be due to people having conditions such as autism or social anxiety disorders, and assuming ill will could be harmful to these people. [25] [26]

Examples

In conducting two focus groups with Asian-Americans, for instance, Sue proposed different themes under the ideology of microinsult and microinvalidation. [18]

Microinvalidation:

  • Alien in own land: When people assume people of color are foreigners.
    • E.g.: "So where are you really from?" or "Why don't you have an accent?
  • Denial of racial reality: When people emphasize that a person of color does not suffer from racial discrimination or inequality (this correlates to the idea of model minority).
  • Invisibility: Asian-Americans are considered invisible or outside discussions of race and racism.
    • E.g.: Discussions on race in the United States excluding Asian-Americans by focusing only on 'white and black' issues.
  • Refusal to acknowledge intra-ethnic differences: When a speaker ignores intra-ethnic differences and assumes a broad homogeneity over multiple ethnic groups.
    • E.g.: Descriptions such as "all Asian-Americans look alike", or assumptions that all members of an ethnic minority speak the same language or have the same cultural values.

Microinsult:

  • Pathologizing cultural values/communication styles: When Asian American culture and values are viewed as less desirable.
    • E.g.: Viewing the valuation of silence (a cultural norm present in some Asian communities) as a fault, leading to disadvantages caused by the expectation of verbal participation common in many Western academic settings.
  • Second-class citizenship: When minorities are treated as lesser human beings, or are not treated with equal rights or priority.
    • E.g.: A Korean man asking for a drink in a bar being ignored by the bartender, or the bartender choosing to serve a white man before serving the Korean man.
  • Ascription of intelligence: When people of color are stereotyped to have a certain level of intelligence based on their race.
    • E.g.: "You people always do well in school", or "If I see a lot of Asian students in my class, I know it's going to be a hard class".
  • Exoticization of non-white women: When non-white women are stereotyped as being in the "exotic" category based on gender, appearance, and media expectations.
    • E.g.: Descriptions of an Asian-American woman as a 'Dragon Lady', 'Tiger mother', or 'Lotus Blossom', or using symbols associated with Eastern cultures.

In a 2017 peer-reviewed review of the literature, Scott Lilienfeld critiqued microaggression research for hardly having advanced beyond taxonomies such as the above, which was proposed by Sue nearly ten years earlier. [21] While acknowledging the reality of "subtle slights and insults directed toward minorities", Lilienfeld concluded that the concept and programs for its scientific assessment are "far too underdeveloped on the conceptual and methodological fronts to warrant real-world application". [21] He recommended abandonment of the term microaggression since "the use of the root word 'aggression' in 'microaggression' is conceptually confusing and misleading". In addition, he called for a moratorium on microaggression training programs until further research can develop the field. [21]

In 2017 Althea Nagai, who works as a research fellow at the conservative Center for Equal Opportunity, published an article in the National Association of Scholars journal Academic Questions , criticizing microaggression research as pseudoscience. [27] Nagai said that the prominent critical race researchers behind microaggression theory "reject the methodology and standards of modern science." [27] She lists various technical shortcomings of microaggression research, including "biased interview questions, reliance on narrative and small numbers of respondents, problems of reliability, issues of replicability, and ignoring alternative explanations." [27] [28]

Gender

Explicit sexism in the society of the US is on the decline, but still exists in a variety of subtle and non-subtle expressions. [29] Women encounter microaggressions in which they are made to feel inferior, sexually objectified, and bound to restrictive gender roles, [30] both in the workplace and in academia, as well as in athletics. [31] Microaggressions based on gender are applied to female athletes when their abilities are compared only to men, when they are judged on "attractiveness", and when they are restricted to "feminine" or sexually attractive attire during competition. [30]

Other examples of sexist microaggressions are "[addressing someone by using] a sexist name, a man refusing to wash dishes because it is 'women's work,' displaying nude pin-ups of women at places of employment, someone making unwanted sexual advances toward another person". [32]

Makin and Morczek also use the term gendered microaggression to refer to male interest in violent rape pornography. [33]

Sociologists Sonny Nordmarken and Reese Kelly (2014) identified trans-specific microaggressions that transgender people face in healthcare settings, which include pathologization, sexualization, rejection, invalidation, exposure, isolation, intrusion, and coercion. [34]

Sexuality and sexual orientation

In focus groups, individuals identifying as bisexual report such microaggressions as others denying or dismissing their self-narratives or identity claims, being unable to understand or accept bisexuality as a possibility, pressuring them to change their bisexual identity, expecting them to be sexually promiscuous, and questioning their ability to maintain monogamous relationships. [35]

Some LGBTQ individuals report receiving expressions of microaggression from people even within the LGBTQ community. [36] They say that being excluded, or not being made welcome or understood within the gay and lesbian community is a microaggression. [35] Roffee and Waling suggest that the issue arises, as occurs among many groups of people, because a person often makes assumptions based on individual experience, and when they communicate such assumptions, the recipient may feel that it lacks taking the second individual into account and is a form of microaggression. [36]

Intersectionality

People who are members of overlapping marginal groups (e.g., a gay Asian American man or a trans woman) experience microaggressions based in correspondingly varied forms of marginalization. [37] [ failed verification ] For example, in one study Asian American women reported feeling they were classified as sexually exotic by majority-culture men or were viewed by them as potential trophy wives simply because of their group membership. [38] African American women report microaggressions related to characteristics of their hair, which may include invasion of personal space as an individual tries to touch it, or comments that a style that is different from that of a European American woman looks "unprofessional". [15] [39]

People with mental illnesses

People with mental illness report receiving more overt forms of microaggression than subtle ones, coming from family and friends as well as from authority figures. [40] In a study involving college students and adults who were being treated in community care, five themes were identified: invalidation, assumption of inferiority, fear of mental illness, shaming of mental illness, and being treated as a second-class citizen. [40] Invalidation would occur, for example, when friends and family members minimized mental health symptoms; one participant described others claiming "You can't be depressed, you're smiling." [40] People would sometimes falsely assume that mental illness means lower intelligence; a participant reported that the hospital staff in a psych ward were speaking to mentally ill patients as if they could not understand instructions. [40]

Disability

Individuals who have an aspect of their identity that lacks a sense of systemic power are subject to microaggressions; thus, persons with disabilities are subject to ableist microaggressions. [41] Like others with marginalized identities, microaggressions toward individuals with disabilities may manifest as a microassault, a microinsult, or a microinvalidation, all of which may also be executed as an environmental microaggression. [18]

Current literature is available to better understand microaggressions in the context of ability. In one qualitative study, a group of researchers studied a sample of individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) diagnoses. MS is a chronic disease that may impact mental, cognitive, and physical abilities. [42] The researchers illustrated examples of real-life ableist microaggressions in the context of microassaults, microinsults, and microinvalidations faced by their sample, specifically in the workplace.

People with physical disabilities also face microaggressions, [43] [44] [45] such as

Media

Members of marginalized groups have also described microaggressions committed by performers or artists associated with various forms of media, such as television, film, photography, music, and books. Some researchers believe that such cultural content reflects but also molds society, [46] allowing for unintentional bias to be absorbed by individuals based on their media consumption, as if it were expressed by someone with whom they had an encounter.

A study of racism in TV commercials describes microaggressions as gaining a cumulative weight, leading to inevitable clashes between races due to subtleties in the content. [46] As an example of a racial microaggression, or microassault, [18] this research found that black people were more likely than white counterparts to be shown eating or participating in physical activity, and more likely to be shown working for, or serving others. [46] The research concludes by suggesting that microaggressive representations can be omitted from a body of work, without sacrificing creativity or profit.

Pérez Huber and Solorzano [47] start their analysis of microaggressions with an anecdote about Mexican "bandits" as portrayed in a children's book read at bedtime. The article gives examples of negative stereotypes of Mexicans and Latinos in books, print, and photos, associating them with the state of racial discourse within majority culture and its dominance over minority groups in the US. The personification of these attitudes through media can also be applied to microaggressive behaviors towards other marginalized groups.

A 2015 review of the portrayal of LGBT characters in film says that gay or lesbian characters are presented in "offensive" ways. [48] In contrast, LGBT characters portrayed as complex characters who are more than a cipher for their sexual orientation or identity are a step in the right direction. Ideally, "queer film audiences finally have a narrative pleasure that has been afforded to straight viewers since the dawn of film noir: a central character who is highly problematical, but fascinating." [48]

Ageism and intolerance

Microaggression can target and marginalize any definable group, including those who share an age grouping or belief system. Microaggression is a manifestation of bullying that employs microlinguistic power plays in order to marginalize any target with a subtle manifestation of intolerance by signifying the concept of "other". [49]

Perpetrators

Because microaggressions are subtle and perpetrators may be unaware of the harm they cause, the recipients often experience attributional ambiguity, which may lead them to dismiss the event and blame themselves as overly sensitive to the encounter. [50]

If challenged by the minority person or an observer, perpetrators will often defend their microaggression as a misunderstanding, a joke, or something small that should not be blown out of proportion. [51]

A 2020 study involving American college students found a correlation between likelihood to commit microaggressions, and racial bias. [52]

Effects

A 2013 scholarly review of the literature on microaggressions concluded that "the negative impact of racial microaggressions on psychological and physical health is beginning to be documented; however, these studies have been largely correlational and based on recall and self-report, making it difficult to determine whether racial microaggressions actually cause negative health outcomes and, if so, through what mechanisms". [53] A 2017 review of microaggression research argued that that as scholars try to understand the possible harm caused by microaggressions, they have not conducted much cognitive or behavioral research, nor much experimental testing, and they have overly relied on small collections of anecdotal testimonies from samples who are not representative of any particular population. [21] These assertions were later argued against in that same journal in 2020, [54] [55] but the response was criticized for failing to address the findings of the systematic reviews and continuing to draw causal inferences from correlational data. [56]

Recipients of microaggressions may feel anger, frustration, or exhaustion. African Americans have reported feeling under pressure to "represent" their group or to suppress their own cultural expression and "act white". [57] Over time, the cumulative effect of microaggressions is thought by some to lead to diminished self-confidence and a poor self-image for individuals, and potentially also to such mental-health problems as depression, anxiety, and trauma. [51] [57] [58] [59] Many researchers have argued that microaggressions are more damaging than overt expressions of bigotry precisely because they are small and therefore often ignored or downplayed, leading the victim to feel self-doubt for noticing or reacting to the encounter, rather than justifiable anger, and isolation rather than support from others about such incidents. [60] [61] [62] Studies have found that in the U.S. when people of color perceived microaggressions from mental health professionals, client satisfaction with therapy is lower. [63] [64] Some studies suggest that microaggressions represent enough of a burden that some people of color may fear, distrust, and/or avoid relationships with white people in order to evade such interaction. [58] On the other hand, some people report that dealing with microaggressions has made them more resilient. [59] Scholars have suggested that, although microaggressions "might seem minor", they are "so numerous that trying to function in such a setting is 'like lifting a ton of feathers.'" [65]

An ethnographic study of transgender people in healthcare settings observed that participants sometimes responded to microaggressions by leaving a hospital in the middle of treatment, and never returning to a formal healthcare setting again. [34]

Criticism

Public discourse and harm to speakers

Kenneth R. Thomas wrote in American Psychologist that recommendations inspired by microaggression theory, if "implemented, could have a chilling effect on free speech and on the willingness of White people, including some psychologists, to interact with people of color." [22] Sociologists Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning have written in the academic journal Comparative Sociology that the microaggression concept "fits into a larger class of conflict tactics in which the aggrieved seek to attract and mobilize the support of third parties" that sometimes involves "building a case for action by documenting, exaggerating, or even falsifying offenses". [66] The concept of microaggressions has been described as a symptom of the breakdown in civil discourse, and that microaggressions are "yesterday's well-meaning faux pas". [67]

One suggested type of microaggression by an Oxford University newsletter was avoiding eye contact or not speaking directly to people. This spurred a controversy in 2017 when it was pointed out that such assumptions are insensitive to autistic people who may have trouble making eye contact. [25] [26]

In a 2019 journal article, Scott Lilienfeld, who is a critic of microaggression theory, titled a section: "The Search for Common Ground." [68] Lilienfeld agrees that "a discussion of microaggressions, however we choose to conceptualize them, may indeed have a place on college campuses and businesses." [68]  In such conversations, Lilienfeld states it is important to assume "most or all individuals…were genuinely offended," "to listen nondefensively to their concerns and reactions," and to "be open to the possibility that we have been inadvertently insensitive." [68] In his latest book, D.W. Sue, who popularized the term microaggression, also recommends a "collaborative rather than an attacking tone." [69]

Culture of victimhood

In their article "Microaggression and Moral Cultures", sociologists Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning [66] say that the discourse of microaggression leads to a culture of victimhood. Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt states that this culture of victimhood lessens an individual's "ability to handle small interpersonal matters on one's own" and "creates a society of constant and intense moral conflict as people compete for status as victims or as defenders of victims". [70] Similarly, the linguist and social commentator John McWhorter says that "it infantilizes black people to be taught that microaggressions, and even ones a tad more macro, hold us back, permanently damage our psychology, or render us exempt from genuine competition." [71] McWhorter does not disagree that microaggressions exist. However, he worries that too much societal focus on microaggressions will cause other problems and has stated that the term should be confined to "when people belittle us on the basis of stereotypes." [72]

Emotional distress

In The Atlantic , Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt expressed concern that the focus on microaggressions can cause more emotional trauma than the experience of the microaggressions at the time of occurrence. They believe that self-policing by an individual of thoughts or actions in order to avoid committing microaggressions may cause emotional harm as a person seeks to avoid becoming a microaggressor, as such extreme self-policing may share some characteristics of pathological thinking. [73] Referring especially to prevention programs at schools or universities, they say that the element of protectiveness, of which identifying microaggression allegations are a part, prepares students "poorly for professional life, which often demands intellectual engagement with people and ideas one might find uncongenial or wrong". [73] They also said that it has become "unacceptable to question the reasonableness (let alone the sincerity) of someone's emotional state", resulting in adjudication of alleged microaggressions having characteristics of witch trials. [73]

Amitai Etzioni, writing in The Atlantic , suggested that attention to microaggressions distracts individuals and groups from dealing with much more serious acts. [74]

Political correctness

According to Derald Wing Sue, whose works popularized the term, many critiques are based on the term being misunderstood or misused. He said that his purpose in identifying such comments or actions was to educate people and not to silence or shame them. He further notes that, for instance, identifying that someone has used racial microaggressions is not intended to imply that they are racist. [75]

Mind reading

According to Lilienfeld, a possible harmful effect of microaggression programs is to increase an individual's tendency to over-interpret the words of others in a negative way. [21] : 147  Lilienfeld refers to this as mind reading, "in which individuals assume—without attempts at verification—that others are reacting negatively to them.... For example, Sue et al...regarded the question 'Where were you born?' directed at Asian Americans as a microaggression." [21] : 147 

Microaggression has been mentioned in popular culture since it was coined. In 2016, American academic Fobazi Ettarh created Killing Me Softly: A Game About Microaggressions, an open-access video game. [76] [77] which allows players to navigate through the life of a character who experiences microaggression. [78]

See also

Related Research Articles

Stereotype threat is a situational predicament in which people are or feel themselves to be at risk of conforming to stereotypes about their social group. It is theorized to be a contributing factor to long-standing racial and gender gaps in academic performance. Since its introduction into the academic literature, stereotype threat has become one of the most widely studied topics in the field of social psychology.

Cultural psychology is the study of how cultures reflect and shape their members' psychological processes.

Covert racism is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious. Concealed in the fabric of society, covert racism discriminates against individuals through often evasive or seemingly passive methods. Covert, racially biased decisions are often hidden or rationalized with an explanation that society is more willing to accept. These racial biases cause a variety of problems that work to empower the suppressors while diminishing the rights and powers of the oppressed. Covert racism often works subliminally, and much of the discrimination is done subconsciously.

Internalized racism is a form of internalized oppression, defined by sociologist Karen D. Pyke as the "internalization of racial oppression by the racially subordinated." In her study The Psychology of Racism, Robin Nicole Johnson emphasizes that internalized racism involves both "conscious and unconscious acceptance of a racial hierarchy in which whites are consistently ranked above people of color." These definitions encompass a wide range of instances, including, but not limited to, belief in negative stereotypes, adaptations to white cultural standards, and thinking that supports the status quo.

Aversive racism is a social scientific theory proposed by Samuel L. Gaertner & John F. Dovidio (1986), according to which negative evaluations of racial/ethnic minorities are realized by a persistent avoidance of interaction with other racial and ethnic groups. As opposed to traditional, overt racism, which is characterized by overt hatred for and discrimination against racial/ethnic minorities, aversive racism is characterized by more complex, ambivalent expressions and attitudes nonetheless with prejudicial views towards other races. Aversive racism arises from unconscious personal beliefs taught during childhood. Subtle racist behaviors are usually targeted towards African Americans. Workplace discrimination is one of the best examples of aversive racism. Biased beliefs on how minorities act and think affect how individuals interact with minority members.

Gay affirmative psychotherapy is a form of psychotherapy for non-heterosexual people, specifically gay and lesbian clients, which focuses on client comfort in working towards authenticity and self-acceptance regarding sexual orientation, and does not attempt to "change" them to heterosexual, or to "eliminate or diminish" same-sex "desires and behaviors". The American Psychological Association (APA) offers guidelines and materials for gay affirmative psychotherapy. Affirmative psychotherapy affirms that homosexuality or bisexuality is not a mental disorder, in accordance with global scientific consensus. In fact, embracing and affirming gay identity can be a key component to recovery from other mental illnesses or substance abuse. Clients whose religious beliefs are interpreted as teaching against homosexual behavior may require some other method of integration of their possibly conflicting religious and sexual selves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kevin Nadal</span> American writer

Kevin Nadal is an author, activist, comedian, and Distinguished Professor of Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York. He is a researcher and expert on the effects of microaggressions on racial/ethnic minorities and LGBTQ people.

Black psychology, also known as African-American psychology and African/Black psychology, is a scientific field that focuses on how people of African descent know and experience the world. The field, particularly in the United States, largely emerged as a result of the lack of understanding of the psychology of Black people under traditional, Westernized notions of psychology. Overall, the field combines perspectives from both Black studies and traditional psychology encapsulating a range of definitions and approaches while simultaneously proposing its own framework of understanding.

Social privilege is an advantage or entitlement that benefits individuals belonging to certain groups, often to the detriment of others. Privileged groups can be advantaged based on social class, wealth, education, caste, age, height, skin color, physical fitness, nationality, geographic location, cultural differences, ethnic or racial category, gender, gender identity, neurodiversity, physical disability, sexual orientation, religion, and other differentiating factors. Individuals can be privileged in one area, such as education, and not privileged in another area, such as health. The amount of privilege any individual has may change over time, such as when a person becomes disabled, or when a child becomes a young adult.

Institutional betrayal is a concept described by psychologist Jennifer Freyd, referring to "wrongdoings perpetrated by an institution upon individuals dependent on that institution, including failure to prevent or respond supportively to wrongdoings by individuals committed within the context of the institution". It is an extension of betrayal trauma theory. When institutions such as universities cover up violations such as rape, sexual assault and child sexual abuse, this institutional betrayal undermines survivors' recovery. In a landmark study in 2013, Carly P. Smith and Freyd documented psychological harm caused by institutional betrayal. A legal analysis concludes that this study is reliable under the Frye standard and the Daubert standard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gendered racism</span>

Gendered racism is a form of oppression that occurs due to race and gender. It is perpetuated due to the prevalence of perceptions, stereotypes, and images of certain groups. Racism functions as a way to distinguish races as inferior or superior to one another. "Sexism" is defined as prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination on the basis of sex. Gendered racism differs in that it pertains specifically to racial and ethnic understandings of masculinity and femininity, as well as along gendered forms of race and ethnic discrimination.

In social psychology, a positive stereotype refers to a subjectively favourable belief held about a social group. Common examples of positive stereotypes are Asians with better math ability, African Americans with greater athletic ability, and women with being warmer and more communal. As opposed to negative stereotypes, positive stereotypes represent a "positive" evaluation of a group that typically signals an advantage over another group. As such, positive stereotypes may be considered a form of compliment or praise. However, positive stereotypes can have a positive or negative effect on targets of positive stereotypes. The positive or negative influence of positive stereotypes on targets depends on three factors: (1) how the positive stereotype is stated, (2) who is stating the positive stereotype, (3) in what culture the positive stereotype is presented.

Race-based traumatic stress is the traumatic response to stress following a racial encounter. Robert T. Carter's (2007) theory of race-based traumatic stress implies that there are individuals of color who experience racial discrimination as traumatic, and often generate responses similar to post-traumatic stress. Race-based traumatic stress combines theories of stress, trauma and race-based discrimination to describe a particular response to negative racial encounters.

Racial trauma, or race-based traumatic stress, is the cumulative effects of racism on an individual’s mental and physical health. It has been observed in numerous BIPOC communities and people of all ages, including young children. Racial trauma can be experienced vicariously or directly. It has been linked to feelings of anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation, as well as other physical health issues.

The weathering hypothesis was proposed to account for early health deterioration as a result of cumulative exposure to experiences of social, economic, and political adversity. It is well documented that minority groups and marginalized communities suffer from poorer health outcomes. This may be due to a multitude of stressors including prejudice, social alienation, institutional bias, political oppression, economic exclusion, and racial discrimination. The weathering hypothesis proposes that the cumulative burden of these stressors as individuals age is "weathering," and the increased weathering experienced by minority groups compared to others can account for differences in health outcomes. In recent years, the biological plausibility of the weathering hypothesis has been investigated in studies evaluating the physiological effects of social, environmental and political stressors among marginalized communities. This has led to more widespread use of the weathering hypothesis as a framework for explaining health disparities on the basis of differential exposure to racially based stressors. Researchers have also identified patterns connecting weathering to biological phenomena associated with stress and aging, such as allostatic load, epigenetics, telomere shortening, and accelerated brain aging.

Racial battle fatigue is a term coined in 2003 to describe the psychosocial stress responses from being a racially oppressed group member in society and on a historically White campus. The term was introduced by William A. Smith, a professor in the Division of Ethnic Studies and Department of Education, Culture, and Society at the University of Utah. The framework intends to offer a lens to better understand racial undertones of a campus environment and educational experiences for people of color. Smith's research was originally conducted on Black faculty, both men and women, and then on Black college students, prior to a more focused examination on African American men. Since this earlier period of research, racial battle fatigue scholarship has been used to include other racially marginalized groups. The phenomenon builds on existing research connecting African Americans and other people of color with oppression and discrimination experienced at historically White institutions. Smith incorporates literature on combat trauma and combat stress syndrome to help understand the effects of managing hostile environments and the ensuing persistent stress.

Racial-ethnic socialization describes the developmental processes by which children acquire the behaviors, perceptions, values, and attitudes of an ethnic group, and come to see themselves and others as members of the group.

In the Western world or in non-Asian countries, terms such as "racism against Asians" or "anti-Asian racism" are typically used in reference to racist policies, discrimination against, and mistreatment of Asian people and Asian immigrants by institutions and/or non-Asian people.

Michelle (Mikki) Rae Hebl is an applied psychologist whose research focuses on workplace discrimination and barriers experienced by stigmatized individuals. She is the Martha and Henry Malcolm Lovett Professor of Psychological Sciences at Rice University and affiliated with the Jones Graduate School of Business.

The psychological impact of discrimination on health refers to the cognitive pathways through which discrimination impacts mental and physical health in members of marginalized, subordinate, and low-status groups. Research on the relation between discrimination and health became a topic of interest in the 1990s, when researchers proposed that persisting racial/ethnic disparities in health outcomes could potentially be explained by racial/ethnic differences in experiences with discrimination. Although the bulk of the research tend to focus on the interactions between interpersonal discrimination and health, researchers studying discrimination and health in the United States have proposed that institutional discrimination and cultural racism also give rise to conditions that contribute to persisting racial and economic health disparities.

References

  1. 1 2 Sue DW (2010). Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Wiley. pp. xvi. ISBN   978-0-470-49140-9.
  2. ↑ Delpit L (2012). "Multiplication Is for White People": Raising Expectations for Other People's Children . The New Press. ISBN   978-1-59558-046-7.
  3. ↑ Treadwell HM (2013). Beyond Stereotypes in Black and White: How Everyday Leaders Can Build Healthier Opportunities for African American Boys and Men. Praeger Publishing. p. 47. ISBN   978-1-4408-0399-4.
  4. ↑ Sommers-Flanagan R (2012). Counseling and Psychotherapy Theories in Context and Practice: Skills, Strategies, and Techniques. Wiley. p. 294. ISBN   978-0-470-61793-9.
  5. ↑ Paludi MA (2010). Victims of Sexual Assault and Abuse: Resources and Responses for Individuals and Families (Women's Psychology). Praeger Publishing. p. 22. ISBN   978-0-313-37970-3.
  6. ↑ Paludi MA (2012). Managing Diversity in Today's Workplace: Strategies for Employees and Employers. Praeger Publishing. ISBN   978-0-313-39317-4.
  7. ↑ Cantu, Edward; Jussim, Lee (Fall 2021). "Microaggressions, Questionable Science, and Free Speech". Texas Review of Law & Politics. 26 (1): 217–267. SSRN   3822628.
  8. ↑ Lukianoff, Greg; Haidt, Jonathan (September 2015). "How Trigger Warnings Are Hurting Mental Health on Campus". The Atlantic . Retrieved September 2, 2018.
  9. ↑ Friedersdorf, Conor (September 14, 2015). "Why Critics of the 'Microaggressions' Framework Are Skeptical". The Atlantic . Retrieved September 2, 2018.
  10. ↑ Zamudio-Suarez, Fernanda (June 29, 2016). "What Happens When Your Research Is Featured on 'Fox & Friends'". The Chronicle of Higher Education . Retrieved April 23, 2021.
  11. ↑ Sue, Derald Wing; Spanierman, Lisa (2020). Microaggressions in Everyday Life. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-119-51380-3.[ page needed ]
  12. ↑ "The Right to Not Remain Silent". Teachers College - Columbia University. Retrieved January 29, 2022.
  13. ↑ Harrison, Colin; Tanner, Kimberly D. (2018). "Language Matters: Considering Microaggressions in Science". CBE: Life Sciences Education. 17 (1): fe4. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-01-0011. PMC   6007773 . PMID   29496676.
  14. ↑ Sue, D. W., & Capodilupo, C. M. (2008). Racial, gender, and sexual orientation microaggressions: Implications for counseling and psychotherapy. In D.W. Sue & D. Sue (Eds.), Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. 1 2 3 Kanter JW, Williams MT, Kuczynski AM, Manbeck KE, Debreaux M, Rosen DC (December 1, 2017). "A Preliminary Report on the Relationship Between Microaggressions Against Black People and Racism Among White College Students". Race and Social Problems. 9 (4): 291–299. doi:10.1007/s12552-017-9214-0. ISSN   1867-1748. S2CID   4792728.
  16. ↑ Pierce C (1970). "Offensive mechanisms". In Barbour F (ed.). In the Black Seventies. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent. pp. 265–282.
  17. ↑ Alabi, J. (2015). "Racial microaggressions in academic libraries: results of a survey of minority and non-minority librarians". Journal of Academic Librarianship. 41 (1): 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.008.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, Bucceri JM, Holder AM, Nadal KL, Esquilin M (2007). "Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice". The American Psychologist. 62 (4): 271–86. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.4.271. PMID   17516773. S2CID   7326535.
  19. ↑ Sue DW, Nadal KL, Capodilupo CM, Lin AI, Torino GC, Rivera DP (July 2008). "Racial Microaggressions Against Black Americans: Implications for Counseling". Journal of Counseling & Development. 86 (3): 330–338. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00517.x. S2CID   145807149.
  20. ↑ "UCLA grad students stage sit-in during a class to protest what they see as racially hostile climate" . Retrieved August 3, 2018.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Lilienfeld SO (January 2017). "Microaggressions". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 12 (1): 138–169. doi:10.1177/1745691616659391. PMID   28073337. S2CID   219951045.
  22. 1 2 Thomas KR (2008). "Macrononsense in multiculturalism". The American Psychologist. 63 (4): 274–5, discussion 277–9. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.274. PMID   18473616.
  23. ↑ Harris RS (2008). "Racial microaggression? How do you know?". The American Psychologist. 63 (4): 275–6, discussion 277–9. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.275. PMID   18473617.
  24. ↑ Schacht TE (2008). "A broader view of racial microaggression in psychotherapy". The American Psychologist. 63 (4): 273, discussion 277–9. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.273. PMID   18473615.
  25. 1 2 "Oxford sorry for eye contact racism claim". BBC News. April 28, 2017. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
  26. 1 2 Turner, Camilla (April 29, 2017). "Oxford University apologises for 'everyday racism' advice which offended autistic people". The Telegraph. ISSN   0307-1235 . Retrieved August 3, 2018.
  27. 1 2 3 Nagai A (March 2017). "The Pseudo-Science of Microaggressions". Academic Questions. 30 (1): 47–57. doi:10.1007/s12129-016-9613-5. S2CID   151587438.
  28. ↑ Marchello L (August 2, 2017). "Rutgers Orders Freshmen to Add Microaggression to Their Course Lists". Reason . Retrieved August 4, 2017.
  29. ↑ Basford TE, Offermann LR, Behrend TS (November 19, 2013). "Do You See What I See? Perceptions of Gender Microaggressions in the Workplace". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 38 (3): 340–349. doi:10.1177/0361684313511420. S2CID   146761354.
  30. 1 2 Kaskan ER, Ho IK (2016). "Microaggressions and Female Athletes". Sex Roles. 74 (7–8): 275–287. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0425-1. S2CID   145707094.
  31. ↑ Ross-Sheriff F (2012). "Microaggression, Women, and Social Work". Affilia. 27 (3): 233–236. doi: 10.1177/0886109912454366 . S2CID   145451726.
  32. ↑ Wing DW (2010). Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. p. 169. ISBN   978-0-470-49140-9. OCLC   430842664.
  33. ↑ Makin DA, Morczek AL (July 2016). "X Views and Counting: Interest in Rape-Oriented Pornography as Gendered Microaggression". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 31 (12): 2131–55. doi:10.1177/0886260515573572. PMID   25724876. S2CID   206564636.
  34. 1 2 Nordmarken, Sonny; Kelly, Reese (2014). "Limiting Transgender Health: Administrative Violence and Microaggressions in Health Care Systems". In Harvey, Vickie L.; Housel, Teresa Heinz (eds.). Health Care Disparities and the LGBT Population. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 143–166. ISBN   978-0-7391-8702-9.
  35. 1 2 Bostwick W, Hequembourg A (2014). "'Just a little hint': bisexual-specific microaggressions and their connection to epistemic injustices". Culture, Health & Sexuality. 16 (5): 488–503. doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.889754. PMID   24666221. S2CID   12844733.
  36. 1 2 Roffee JA, Waling A (2016). "Rethinking microaggressions and anti-social behaviour against LGBTIQ youth". Safer Communities. 15 (4): 190–201. doi:10.1108/sc-02-2016-0004. ISSN   1757-8043.
  37. ↑ Zesiger H (July 25, 2013). "Racial Microaggressions and College Student Wellbeing" (PDF). Archived from the original on October 14, 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  38. ↑ Sue DW, Bucceri J, Lin AI, Nadal KL, Torino GC (January 2007). "Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience". Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. 13 (1): 72–81. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.72. PMID   17227179. S2CID   7607812.
  39. ↑ Lundberg-Love PK (2011). Women and Mental Disorders. Praeger Women's Psychology. p. 98. ISBN   978-0-313-39319-8.
  40. 1 2 3 4 Gonzales L, Davidoff KC, Nadal KL, Yanos PT (September 2015). "Microaggressions experienced by persons with mental illnesses: An exploratory study". Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 38 (3): 234–41. doi:10.1037/prj0000096. PMID   25402611.
  41. ↑ Mio, Jeffery Scott (2020). Multicultural psychology : understanding our diverse communities. Lori A. Barker, Melanie M. Domenech Rodriguez (5th ed.). New York, New York. ISBN   978-0-19-085495-9. OCLC   1076461020.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  42. ↑ Lee, Eun-Jeong; Ditchman, Nicole; Thomas, Julia; Tsen, Jonathan (2019). "Microaggressions experienced by people with multiple sclerosis in the workplace: An exploratory study using Sue's taxonomy". Rehabilitation Psychology. 64 (2): 179–193. doi:10.1037/rep0000269. ISSN   1939-1544. PMID   30907614. S2CID   85497480.
  43. ↑ Eisenmenger, Ashley (December 12, 2019). "Ableism 101 - What is Ableism? What Does it Look Like?". Access Living. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
  44. ↑ "#Ableism – Center for Disability Rights". cdrnys.org. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
  45. ↑ "Understanding ableism and negative reactions to disability". www.apa.org. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
  46. 1 2 3 Pierce CM, Carew JV, Pierce-Gonzalez D, Wills D (1977). "An Experiment in Racism". Education and Urban Society. 10 (1): 61–87. doi:10.1177/001312457701000105. S2CID   147068226.
  47. ↑ Pérez Huber L, Solorzano DG (2015). "Visualizing Everyday Racism". Qualitative Inquiry. 21 (3): 223–238. doi:10.1177/1077800414562899. S2CID   143596635.
  48. 1 2 Stein, Peter L. (November 2015). "A cinematic trend emerges: 'gays gone bad'" (PDF). The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide. 22 (6): 25–26. Gale   A433588107.
  49. ↑ Gendron TL, Welleford EA, Inker J, White JT (December 2016). "The Language of Ageism: Why We Need to Use Words Carefully". The Gerontologist. 56 (6): 997–1006. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv066 . PMID   26185154.
  50. ↑ David E (2013). Internalized Oppression: The Psychology of Marginalized Groups. Springer Publishing Company. p. 5. ISBN   978-0-8261-9925-6.
  51. 1 2 Love KL (2009). An emancipatory study with African -American women in predominantly White nursing schools (Thesis). ProQuest   304870336.
  52. ↑ Kanter, Jonathan (September 24, 2020). "Microaggressions aren't just innocent blunders – new research links them with racial bias". The Conversation. Retrieved September 27, 2020.
  53. ↑ Wong G, Derthick AO, David EJ, Saw A, Okazaki S (June 2014). "How: A Review of Racial Microaggressions Research in Psychology". Race and Social Problems. 6 (2): 181–200. doi:10.1007/s12552-013-9107-9. PMC   4762607 . PMID   26913088.
  54. ↑ Williams, Monnica T. (2020). "Microaggressions: Clarification, evidence, and impact". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1177/1745691619827499. PMID   31418642. S2CID   198627266.
  55. ↑ Williams, Monnica T. (2020). "Psychology cannot afford to ignore the many harms caused by microaggressions". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15 (1): 38–43. doi: 10.1177/1745691619893362 . PMID   31801042. S2CID   208643063.
  56. ↑ Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2020). "Microaggression Research and Application: Clarifications, Corrections, and Common Ground". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15 (1): 27–37. doi: 10.1177/1745691619867117 . PMID   31408611. S2CID   199574567.
  57. 1 2 Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Holder AM (June 2008). "Racial microaggressions in the life experience of Black Americans". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 39 (3): 329–336. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.39.3.329.
  58. 1 2 Evans SY (2009). African Americans and Community Engagement in Higher Education: Community Service, Service-learning, and Community-based Research. State University of New York Press. pp. 126–127. ISBN   978-1-4384-2874-1.
  59. 1 2 Lundberg PK (2011). Women and Mental Disorders. Praeger. pp. 89–92. ISBN   978-0-313-39319-8.
  60. ↑ Greer TM, Chwalisz K (2007). "Minority-Related Stressors and Coping Processes Among African American College Students". Journal of College Student Development. 48 (4): 388–404. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0037. S2CID   145750892.
  61. ↑ Solórzano D, Ceja M, Yosso T (2000). "Critical Race Theory, Racial Microaggressions, and Campus Racial Climate: The Experiences of African American College Students". Journal of Negro Education. 69 (1): 60–73. JSTOR   2696265.
  62. ↑ Watkins NL, Labarrie TL, Appio LM (2010). "Black undergraduates' experience with perceived racial microaggressions in predominantly White colleges and universities". In Sue D (ed.). Microaggressions and Marginality: Manifestation, Dynamics, and Impact. Wiley. pp. 25–58. ISBN   978-0-470-62720-4.
  63. ↑ Constantine MG (2007). "Racial microaggressions against African American clients in cross-racial counseling relationships". Journal of Counseling Psychology. 54 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.1.
  64. ↑ Owen J, Tao KW, Imel ZE, Wampold BE, Rodolfa E (2014). "Addressing racial and ethnic microaggressions in therapy". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 45 (4): 283–290. doi:10.1037/a0037420.
  65. ↑ "Harvard Study Suggests Microaggressions Might Make People Die Sooner". National Review . January 13, 2015. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
  66. 1 2 Campbell B, Manning J (2014). "Microaggression and Moral Cultures". Comparative Sociology. 13 (6): 692–726. doi:10.1163/15691330-12341332.
  67. ↑ Demetriou D. "Fighting Together: Civil Discourse and Agonistic Honor". In Johnson L, Demetriou D (eds.). Honor in the Modern World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Lexington Books. Retrieved June 4, 2016.
  68. 1 2 3 Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2020). "Microaggression Research and Application: Clarifications, Corrections, and Common Ground". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15 (1): 27–37. doi: 10.1177/1745691619867117 . PMID   31408611. S2CID   199574567.
  69. ↑ Sue, Derald Wing; Calle, Cassandra Z.; Mendez, Narolyn; Alsaidi, Sarah; Glaeser, Elizabeth (2021). Microintervention Strategies: What You Can Do to Disarm and Dismantle Individual and Systemic Racism and Bias. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-119-76996-5.[ page needed ]
  70. ↑ Haidt J (September 7, 2015). "Where microaggressions really come from: A sociological account". Righteous Mind. Retrieved September 20, 2015. The key idea is that the new moral culture of victimhood fosters 'moral dependence' and an atrophying of the ability to handle small interpersonal matters on one's own. At the same time that it weakens individuals, it creates a society of constant and intense moral conflict as people compete for status as victims or as defenders of victims.
  71. ↑ "Starbucks and the Swimming Pool - The American Interest". The American Interest. July 26, 2018. Retrieved August 14, 2018.
  72. ↑ "'Microaggression' Is the New Racism on Campus". Time. Retrieved August 14, 2018.
  73. 1 2 3 Lukianoff G, Haidt J (September 2015), The Coddling of the American Mind, The Atlantic , retrieved February 14, 2016
  74. ↑ Etzioni A (April 8, 2014). "Don't Sweat the Microaggressions". The Atlantic.
  75. ↑ Zamudio-Suaréz F (June 29, 2016). "What Happens When Your Research Is Featured on 'Fox & Friends'". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved June 30, 2016.
  76. ↑ "Fobazi Ettarh". SJSU School of information. San Jose State University. October 5, 2020. Archived from the original on May 22, 2022. Retrieved January 15, 2023.
  77. ↑ "Vocational Awe". State Library of Ohio . Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved January 16, 2023.
  78. ↑ "Killing Me Softly: A Game of Microaggressions". CUNY Games Network. Graduate Center, CUNY. August 3, 2016. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved January 16, 2023.

Sue, D.W., Alsaidi, S., Awad, M. N., Glaeser, E., Calle, C.Z., & Mendez, N. (2019). Disarming racial microaggressions: Microintervention strategies for targets, Whites allies, and bystanders. American Psychologist, 74(1), 128.

Sue, D.W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.