Political correctness

Last updated

Political correctness (adjectivally: politically correct; commonly abbreviated PC) is a term used to describe language, policies, or measures that are intended to avoid offense or disadvantage to members of particular groups in society. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] In public discourse and the media, the term is generally used as a pejorative with an implication that these policies are excessive or unwarranted. [6] [3] [7] [8] [9] [10] Since the late 1980s, the term has been used to describe a preference for inclusive language and avoidance of language or behavior that can be seen as excluding, marginalizing, or insulting to groups of people disadvantaged or discriminated against, particularly groups defined by ethnicity, sex, gender, or sexual orientation.


Early usage of the term politically correct by leftists in the 1970s and 1980s was as self-critical satire; usage was ironic, rather than a name for a serious political movement. [7] [11] [12] [13] It was considered an in-joke among leftists used to satirise those who were too rigid in their adherence to political orthodoxy. [14]

The modern pejorative usage of the term emerged from conservative criticism of the New Left in the late 20th century, with many describing it as a form of censorship. [15] Commentators on the political left in the United States contend that conservatives use the concept of political correctness to downplay and divert attention from substantively discriminatory behavior against disadvantaged groups. [16] [17] [18] They also argue that the political right enforces its own forms of political correctness to suppress criticism of its favored constituencies and ideologies. [19] [20] [21] In the United States, the term has played a major role in the "culture war" between liberals and conservatives. [22]


Early-to-mid 20th century

In the early-to-mid 20th century, the phrase politically correct was used to describe strict adherence to a range of ideological orthodoxies within politics. In 1934, The New York Times reported that Nazi Germany was granting reporting permits "only to pure 'Aryans' whose opinions are politically correct". [2]

The term political correctness first appeared in Marxist-Leninist vocabulary following the Russian Revolution of 1917. At that time it was used to describe strict adherence to the policies and principles of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, that is, the party line. [23] Later, in the United States, the phrase came to be associated with accusations of dogmatism in debates between American Communists and American Socialists. According to American educator Herbert Kohl, writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s, the Socialists saw the Communists as always having a "correct" position on all political matters.

The term "politically correct" was used disparagingly, to refer to someone whose loyalty to the CP line overrode compassion, and led to bad politics. It was used by Socialists against Communists, and was meant to separate out Socialists who believed in egalitarian moral ideas from dogmatic Communists who would advocate and defend party positions regardless of their moral substance.

"Uncommon Differences", The Lion and the Unicorn [3]


In the 1970s, the American New Left began using the term politically correct. [11] In the essay The Black Woman: An Anthology (1970), Toni Cade Bambara said that "a man cannot be politically correct and a [male] chauvinist, too." William Safire records this as the first use in the typical modern sense. [24]

Thereafter, the term was often used as self-critical satire. Debra L. Shultz said that "throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the New Left, feminists, and progressives... used their term 'politically correct' ironically, as a guard against their own orthodoxy in social change efforts." [7] [11] [12] PC is used in the comic book Merton of the Movement, by Bobby London, which was followed by the term ideologically sound, in the comic strips of Bart Dickon. [11] [25] In her essay "Toward a feminist Revolution" (1992) Ellen Willis said: "In the early eighties, when feminists used the term 'political correctness', it was used to refer sarcastically to the anti-pornography movement's efforts to define a 'feminist sexuality'." [13]

Stuart Hall suggests one way in which the original use of the term may have developed into the modern one:

According to one version, political correctness actually began as an in-joke on the left: radical students on American campuses acting out an ironic replay of the Bad Old Days BS (Before the Sixties) when every revolutionary groupuscule had a party line about everything. They would address some glaring examples of sexist or racist behaviour by their fellow students in imitation of the tone of voice of the Red Guards or Cultural Revolution Commissar: "Not very 'politically correct', Comrade!" [14]

The term probably entered use in the modern sense in the United Kingdom around 1975. [10] [ clarification needed ]

1980s and 1990s

Allan Bloom's 1987 book The Closing of the American Mind [26] heralded a debate about "political correctness" in American higher education in the 1980s and 1990s. [7] [27] [28] Professor of English literary and cultural studies at CMU Jeffrey J. Williams wrote that the "assault on ... political correctness that simmered through the Reagan years, gained bestsellerdom with Bloom's Closing of the American Mind." [29] According to Z.F. Gamson, Bloom's book "attacked the faculty for 'political correctness'". [30] Prof. of Social Work at CSU Tony Platt says the "campaign against 'political correctness'" was launched by Bloom's book in 1987. [31]

An October 1990 New York Times article by Richard Bernstein is credited with popularizing the term. [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] At this time, the term was mainly being used within academia: "Across the country the term p.c., as it is commonly abbreviated, is being heard more and more in debates over what should be taught at the universities". [37] Nexis citations in "arcnews/curnews" reveal only seventy total citations in articles to "political correctness" for 1990; but one year later, Nexis records 1,532 citations, with a steady increase to more than 7,000 citations by 1994. [35] [38] In May 1991, The New York Times had a follow-up article, according to which the term was increasingly being used in a wider public arena:

What has come to be called "political correctness," a term that began to gain currency at the start of the academic year last fall, has spread in recent months and has become the focus of an angry national debate, mainly on campuses, but also in the larger arenas of American life.

Robert D. McFadden, "Political Correctness: New Bias Test?", 1991. [39]

The previously obscure far-left term became common currency in the lexicon of the conservative social and political challenges against progressive teaching methods and curriculum changes in the secondary schools and universities of the U.S. [8] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] Policies, behavior, and speech codes that the speaker or the writer regarded as being the imposition of a liberal orthodoxy, were described and criticized as "politically correct". [16] In May 1991, at a commencement ceremony for a graduating class of the University of Michigan, then U.S. President George H. W. Bush used the term in his speech: "The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land. And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones. It declares certain topics off-limits, certain expression off-limits, even certain gestures off-limits." [45]

After 1991, its use as a pejorative phrase became widespread amongst conservatives in the US. [8] It became a key term encapsulating conservative concerns about the left in cultural and political debates extending beyond academia. Two articles on the topic in late 1990 in Forbes and Newsweek both used the term "thought police" in their headlines, exemplifying the tone of the new usage, but it was Dinesh D'Souza's Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus (1991) which "captured the press's imagination". [8] Similar critical terminology was used by D'Souza for a range of policies in academia around victimization, supporting multiculturalism through affirmative action, sanctions against anti-minority hate speech, and revising curricula (sometimes referred to as "canon busting"). [8] [46] [ failed verification ] These trends were at least in part a response to multiculturalism and the rise of identity politics, with movements such as feminism, gay rights movements and ethnic minority movements. That response received funding from conservative foundations and think tanks such as the John M. Olin Foundation, which funded several books such as D'Souza's. [7] [16]

Herbert Kohl, in 1992, commented that a number of neoconservatives who promoted the use of the term "politically correct" in the early 1990s were former Communist Party members, and, as a result, familiar with the Marxist use of the phrase. He argued that in doing so, they intended "to insinuate that egalitarian democratic ideas are actually authoritarian, orthodox, and Communist-influenced, when they oppose the right of people to be racist, sexist, and homophobic". [3]

During the 1990s, conservative and right-wing politicians, think tanks, and speakers adopted the phrase as a pejorative descriptor of their ideological enemies – especially in the context of the Culture Wars about language and the content of public-school curricula. Roger Kimball, in Tenured Radicals, endorsed Frederick Crews's view that PC is best described as "Left Eclecticism", a term defined by Kimball as "any of a wide variety of anti-establishment modes of thought from structuralism and poststructuralism, deconstruction, and Lacanian analyst to feminist, homosexual, black, and other patently political forms of criticism". [47] [29]

Liberal commentators have argued that the conservatives and reactionaries who used the term did so in an effort to divert political discussion away from the substantive matters of resolving societal discrimination – such as racial, social class, gender, and legal inequality – against people whom conservatives do not consider part of the social mainstream. [7] [17] [48] Jan Narveson wrote that "that phrase was born to live between scare-quotes: it suggests that the operative considerations in the area so called are merely political, steamrolling the genuine reasons of principle for which we ought to be acting..." [6] Commenting in 2001, one such British journalist, [49] [50] Polly Toynbee, said "the phrase is an empty, right-wing smear, designed only to elevate its user", and, in 2010, "the phrase 'political correctness' was born as a coded cover for all who still want to say Paki , spastic , or queer ". [51] Another British journalist, Will Hutton, [52] wrote in 2001:

Political correctness is one of the brilliant tools that the American Right developed in the mid–1980s, as part of its demolition of American liberalism.... What the sharpest thinkers on the American Right saw quickly was that by declaring war on the cultural manifestations of liberalism – by levelling the charge of "political correctness" against its exponents – they could discredit the whole political project.

Will Hutton, "Words Really are Important, Mr Blunkett", 2001.

Glenn Loury wrote in 1994 that to address the subject of "political correctness" when power and authority within the academic community is being contested by parties on either side of that issue, is to invite scrutiny of one's arguments by would-be "friends" and "enemies". Combatants from the left and the right will try to assess whether a writer is "for them" or "against them". [53]

Geoffrey Hughes suggested that debate over political correctness concerns whether changing language actually solves political and social problems, with critics viewing it less about solving problems than imposing censorship, intellectual intimidation and demonstrating the moral purity of those who practice it. Hughes also argues that political correctness tends to be pushed by a minority rather than an organic form of language change. [54]


The modern pejorative usage of the term emerged from conservative criticism of the New Left in the late 20th century. This usage was popularized by a number of articles in The New York Times and other media throughout the 1990s, [37] [39] [32] [55] [33] [34] and was widely used in the debate surrounding Allan Bloom's 1987 book The Closing of the American Mind . [7] [26] [27] The term gained further currency in response to Roger Kimball's Tenured Radicals (1990), [7] [16] [47] and conservative author Dinesh D'Souza's 1991 book Illiberal Education. [7] [8] [16] [56] Supporters of politically correct language have been pejoratively referred to as the "language police". [57]


Modern debate on the term was sparked by conservative critiques of perceived liberal bias in academia and education, [7] and conservatives have since used it as a major line of attack. [8]

Similarly, a common conservative criticism of higher education in the United States is that the political views of teaching staff are more liberal than those of the general population, and that this contributes to an atmosphere of political correctness. [58] [ non-primary source needed ] William Deresiewicz defines political correctness as an attempt to silence "unwelcome beliefs and ideas", arguing that it is largely the result of for-profit education, as campus faculty and staff are wary of angering students upon whose fees they depend. [59] [ non-primary source needed ]

Preliminary research published in 2020 indicated that students at a large U.S. public university generally felt instructors were open-minded and encouraged free expression of diverse viewpoints; nonetheless, most students worried about the consequences of voicing their political opinions, with "[a]nxieties about expressing political views and self-censorship ... more prevalent among students who identify as conservative". [60] [61]

As a conspiracy theory

Some conservative commentators in the West argue that "political correctness" and multiculturalism are part of a conspiracy with the ultimate goal of undermining Judeo-Christian values. This theory, which holds that political correctness originates from the critical theory of the Frankfurt School as part of a conspiracy that its proponents call "Cultural Marxism". [62] The theory originated with Michael Minnicino's 1992 essay "New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness'", published in a Lyndon LaRouche movement journal. [63] In 2001, conservative commentator Patrick Buchanan wrote in The Death of the West that "political correctness is cultural Marxism", and that "its trademark is intolerance". [64]


In the US, the term has been widely used in books and journals, but in Britain, usage has been confined mainly to the popular press. [65] Many such authors and popular-media figures, particularly on the right, have used the term to criticize what they see as bias in the media. [6] [16] William McGowan argues that journalists get stories wrong or ignore stories worthy of coverage, because of what McGowan perceives to be their liberal ideologies and their fear of offending minority groups. [66] Robert Novak, in his essay "Political Correctness Has No Place in the Newsroom", used the term to blame newspapers for adopting language use policies that he thinks tend to excessively avoid the appearance of bias. He argued that political correctness in language not only destroys meaning but also demeans the people who are meant to be protected. [67]

Authors David Sloan and Emily Hoff claim that in the US, journalists shrug off concerns about political correctness in the newsroom, equating the political correctness criticisms with the old "liberal media bias" label. [68] According to author John Wilson, left-wing forces of "political correctness" have been blamed for unrelated censorship, with Time citing campaigns against violence on network television in the US as contributing to a "mainstream culture [that] has become cautious, sanitized, scared of its own shadow" because of "the watchful eye of the p.c. police", protests and advertiser boycotts targeting TV shows are generally organized by right-wing religious groups campaigning against violence, sex, and depictions of homosexuality on television. [69]

Satirical use

Political correctness is often satirized, for example in The PC Manifesto (1992) by Saul Jerushalmy and Rens Zbignieuw X, [70] and Politically Correct Bedtime Stories (1994) by James Finn Garner, which presents fairy tales re-written from an exaggerated politically correct perspective. In 1994, the comedy film PCU took a look at political correctness on a college campus.

Other examples include the television program Politically Incorrect , George Carlin's "Euphemisms" routine,[ citation needed ] and The Politically Correct Scrapbook. [71] The popularity of the South Park cartoon program led to the creation of the term "South Park Republican" by Andrew Sullivan, and later the book South Park Conservatives by Brian C. Anderson. [72] In its Season 19 (2015), South Park introduced the character PC Principal, who embodies the principle, to poke fun at the principle of political correctness. [73]

The Colbert Report's host Stephen Colbert often talked, satirically, about the "PC Police". [74]


Groups who oppose certain generally accepted scientific views about evolution, second-hand tobacco smoke, AIDS, global warming, race and other politically contentious scientific matters have used the term "political correctness" to describe what they view as unwarranted rejection of their perspective on these issues by a scientific community that they believe has been corrupted by liberal politics. [75]

Right-wing political correctness

"Political correctness" is a label typically used to describe liberal terms and actions, but rarely used for analogous attempts to mold language and behavior on the right. [76] Economist Paul Krugman, in 2012, wrote that "the big threat to our discourse is right-wing political correctness, which – unlike the liberal version – has lots of power and money behind it. And the goal is very much the kind of thing Orwell tried to convey with his notion of Newspeak: to make it impossible to talk, and possibly even think, about ideas that challenge the established order." [21] [77] Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute referred to the right's own version of political correctness as "patriotic correctness". [78]

See also

Related Research Articles

Feminazi is a pejorative term for feminists that was popularized by politically conservative American radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tory</span> Conservative political philosophy

A Tory is a person who holds a political philosophy known as Toryism, based on a British version of traditionalism and conservatism, which upholds the supremacy of social order as it has evolved in the English culture throughout history. The Tory ethos has been summed up with the phrase "God, King, and Country". Tories are generally monarchists, were historically of a high church Anglican religious heritage, and opposed to the liberalism of the Whig faction. Typically, Tories defend the ideas of hierarchy, natural order, and aristocracy.

The Christian right, or the religious right, are Christian political factions characterized by their strong support of socially conservative and traditionalist policies. Christian conservatives seek to influence politics and public policy with their interpretation of the teachings of Christianity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Culture war</span> Conflict between cultural values

A culture war is a cultural conflict between social groups and the struggle for dominance of their values, beliefs, and practices. It commonly refers to topics on which there is general societal disagreement and polarization in societal values. Its contemporary use refers to a social phenomenon in which multiple social groups, holding distinct values and ideologies, attempt to steer public policy in opposition to each other, thus a culture war now describes "hot button" or "polarizing" social issues in politics and public policy. These include wedge issues such as abortion, homosexuality, transgender rights, pornography, multiculturalism, racism and other cultural conflicts based on values, morality, and lifestyle which are described as the major political cleavage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-LGBT rhetoric</span> Slogans or catchphrases that demean LGBT movement

Anti-LGBT rhetoric comprises themes, catchphrases, and slogans that have been used against homosexuality or other non-heterosexual sexual orientations in order to demean lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. They range from the demeaning and the pejorative to expressions of hostility towards homosexuality which are based on religious, medical, or moral grounds. It is a form of hate speech which is illegal in countries such as the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.

The Conservative Party of Canada, colloquially known as the Tories, is a federal political party in Canada. It was formed in 2003 by the merger of the two main right-leaning parties, the Progressive Conservative Party and the Canadian Alliance, the latter being the successor of the Western Canadian-based Reform Party. The party sits at the centre-right to the right of the Canadian political spectrum, with their federal rival, the Liberal Party of Canada, positioned to their left. The Conservatives are defined as a "big tent" party, practising "brokerage politics" and welcoming a broad variety of members, including "Red Tories" and "Blue Tories".

The term "person of color" is primarily used to describe any person who is not considered "white". In its current meaning, the term originated in, and is primarily associated with, the United States; however, since the 2010s, it has been adopted elsewhere in the Anglosphere, including relatively limited usage in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Ireland, South Africa, and Singapore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republican in Name Only</span> Pejorative term to describe some Republican politicians

In US politics, Republican In Name Only (RINO) is a pejorative used to describe politicians of the Republican Party who are deemed to be insufficiently loyal to the party or misaligned with the party's ideology. Similar terms have been used since the early 1900s. The term is an acronym invented so that it is abbreviated to "RINO" and pronounced to sound like "rhino". The term became popular in the 1990s, and has been used often by former President Donald Trump to describe his critics in the Republican Party.

In the United Kingdom, the hard left are the left-wing political movements and ideas outside the mainstream centre-left.

In politics, a dog whistle is the use of coded or suggestive language in political messaging to garner support from a particular group without provoking opposition. The concept is named for ultrasonic dog whistles, which are audible to dogs but not humans. Dog whistles use language that appears normal to the majority but communicates specific things to intended audiences. They are generally used to convey messages on issues likely to provoke controversy without attracting negative attention.

<i>JoongAng Ilbo</i> South Korean newspaper

The JoongAng, formally known as JoongAng Ilbo, is a South Korean daily newspaper published in Seoul, South Korea. It is one of the three biggest newspapers in South Korea, and a newspaper of record for South Korea. The paper also publishes an English edition, Korea JoongAng Daily, in alliance with the International New York Times. It is often regarded as the holding company of JoongAng Group chaebol as it is owner of various affiliates, such as the broadcast station and drama producing company JTBC, and movie theatres chain Megabox.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reappropriation</span> Valuing a formerly pejorative term in esteem

In linguistics, reappropriation, reclamation, or resignification is the cultural process by which a group reclaims words or artifacts that were previously used in a way disparaging of that group. It is a specific form of a semantic change. Linguistic reclamation can have wider implications in the fields of discourse and has been described in terms of personal or sociopolitical empowerment.

The term Jewish lobby is used to describe organized lobbying attributed to Jews on domestic and foreign policy decisions, as political participants of representative government, conducted predominantly in the Jewish diaspora in a number of Western countries. When used to allege disproportionately favorable Jewish influence, it can be perceived as pejorative or as constituting antisemitism.

"Wingnut", wing nut or wing-nut, is a pejorative American political term referring to a person who holds extreme, and often irrational, political views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Association of Scholars</span> American advocacy nonprofit interested in education

The National Association of Scholars (NAS) is an American non-profit politically conservative advocacy organization, with a particular interest in education. It opposes a perceived political correctness on college campuses and supports a return to mid-20th-century curricular and scholarship norms, and an increase in conservative representation in faculty.

"Cuckservative" is a pejorative formed as a portmanteau of "cuck", an abbreviation of the word "cuckold", and the political designation "conservative". It has become a label used by white nationalists and the alt-right in the United States. The word "cuckservative" reached a high level of mainstream political conversation around mid-July 2015, where it gained media attention just a few weeks before the start of the first Republican primary debate for the 2016 United States presidential election.

Social justice warrior (SJW) is a pejorative term and internet meme used for an individual who promotes socially progressive, left-wing and liberal views, including feminism, civil rights, gay and transgender rights, identity politics, political correctness and multiculturalism. The accusation that somebody is an SJW carries implications that they are pursuing personal validation rather than any deep-seated conviction, and engaging in disingenuous arguments.

<i>Woke</i> Term meaning alert to racial or social injustices

Woke is an English adjective meaning "alert to racial prejudice and discrimination" that originated in African-American Vernacular English (AAVE). Beginning in the 2010s, it came to encompass a broader awareness of social inequalities such as sexism, and has also been used as shorthand for American Left ideas involving identity politics and social justice, such as the notion of white privilege and slavery reparations for African Americans.

The term "Cultural Marxism" refers to a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory which claims that Western Marxism is the basis of continuing academic and intellectual efforts to subvert Western culture. The conspiracy theory misrepresents the Frankfurt School as being responsible for modern progressive movements, identity politics, and political correctness, claiming there is an ongoing and intentional subversion of Western society via a planned culture war that undermines the Christian values of traditionalist conservatism and seeks to replace them with the culturally liberal values of the 1960s.


  1. For definitions, see:
    • "'politically correct' definition". Cambridge English Dictionary . Archived from the original on 6 April 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
    • "Definition of political correctness in English". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 1 January 2017.
    • "'Politically Correct' definition". Merriam-Webster . Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
  2. 1 2 Gibson, Caitlin (13 January 2016). "How 'politically correct' went from compliment to insult". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 June 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Kohl, Herbert (1992). "Uncommon Differences: On Political Correctness, Core Curriculum and Democracy in Education". The Lion and the Unicorn . 16 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1353/uni.0.0216. S2CID   145173687.
  4. Florence, Joshua (30 October 2015). "A Phrase in Flux: The History of Political Correctness". Harvard Political Review . Archived from the original on 22 August 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
  5. Chow, Kat (14 December 2016). "'Politically Correct': The Phrase Has Gone From Wisdom To Weapon". National Public Radio (NPR). Archived from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
  6. 1 2 3 Friedman, Marilyn; Narveson, Jan (1995). Political correctness : for and against. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN   978-0847679867. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Schultz, Debra L. (1993). To Reclaim a Legacy of Diversity: Analyzing the 'Political Correctness' Debates in Higher Education (PDF). National Council for Research on Women. New York. ISBN   978-1880547137. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 28 March 2016.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Whitney, D. Charles & Wartella, Ellen (1992). "Media Coverage of the "Political Correctness" Debate". Journal of Communication . 42 (2): 83. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00780.x.
  9. Duignan, Peter; Gann, L.H. (1995). Political correctness. Stanford, [Calif.]: Hoover InstitutionStanford University. ISBN   978-0817937430. Archived from the original on 7 October 2021. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  10. 1 2 Hughes, Geoffrey (2011). "Origins of the Phrase". Political Correctness: A History of Semantics and Culture. John Wiley & Sons. 1975 – Peter Fuller. ISBN   978-1444360295. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Ruth Perry, (1992), "A Short History of the Term 'Politically Correct'", in Beyond PC: Toward a Politics of Understanding, by Patricia Aufderheide, 1992, ISBN   978-1555971649
  12. 1 2 Schultz citing Perry (1992) p. 16
  13. 1 2 Willis, Ellen. "Toward a Feminist Revolution", in No More Nice Girls: Countercultural Essays (1992) Wesleyan University Press, ISBN   081955250X, p. 19.
  14. 1 2 Hall, Stuart (1994). "Some 'Politically Incorrect' Pathways Through PC" (PDF). S. Dunant (ed.) The War of the Words: The Political Correctness Debate. pp. 164–84. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2013.
  15. Ford, Becky R. (2017). An Empirical Test of the Effects of Political Correctness: Implications for Censorship, Self-Censorship, and Public Deliberation (Thesis). University of California, Santa Barbara. Archived from the original on 11 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wilson, John. 1995. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on High Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 26.
  17. 1 2 Messer-Davidow, Ellen (1995). "Manufacturing the Attack on Liberalized Higher Education: The Humanities and Society in the 1990s".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  18. Mink, Eric (6 October 2016). "Trump's Political-Correctness Con Job". Huffington Post . Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  19. "Conservative Correctness" chapter, in Wilson, John. 1995. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on Higher Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 57.
  20. "Don Williams comments – Dixie Chicks Were Right". mach2.com. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 20 May 2017.
  21. 1 2 Krugman, Paul (26 May 2012). "The New Political Correctness". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2013.
  22. Kaufman, Scott Barry (20 November 2016). "The Personality of Political Correctness; The idea of political correctness is central to the culture wars of American politics". Scientific American . Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2016.
  23. "political correctness". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  24. Safire, William (2008). Safire's political dictionary (Rev. ed.). New York [u.a.]: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0195343342.
  25. Bleifuss, Joel (February 2007). "A Politically Correct Lexicon". In These Times . Archived from the original on 29 June 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
  26. 1 2 Bellow, Allan Bloom; foreword by Saul (1988). The closing of the American mind (1st Touchstone ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN   978-0671657154. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  27. 1 2 Robinson, Sally (2000). Marked men white masculinity in crisis. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 17, 55–86. ISBN   978-0231500364. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
  28. Kamiya, Gary (22 January 1995). "Civilization & Its Discontents". San Francisco Chronicle Magazine . Archived from the original on 28 February 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2015.
  29. 1 2 Williams, Jeffrey (2013). PC Wars: Politics and Theory in the Academy. Routledge. p. 11. ISBN   978-1136656231. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  30. Gamson, Z.F. (1997). "The Stratification of the Academy". Social Text. 51 (51): 67–73. doi:10.2307/466647. JSTOR   466647.
  31. Platt, Tony. "Desegregating Multiculturalism: Problems in the Theory and Pedagogy of Diversity Education" (PDF). Pedagogies for Social Change. 29 (4 (90)). Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 October 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015 via Social Justice.
  32. 1 2 Berman, Paul, ed. (1992). Debating P.C. : the controversy over political correctness on college campuses. p. Introduction. ISBN   978-0307801784. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
  33. 1 2 Smith, Dorothy E. (1999). Writing the social : critique, theory, and investigations (Repr. ed.). Toronto (Ont.): University of Toronto Press. p. 175. ISBN   978-0802081353. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  34. 1 2 Schwartz, Howard S. (1997). "Psychodynamics of Political Correctness". Journal of Applied Behavioral Science . 33 (2): 133–49. doi:10.1177/0021886397332003. S2CID   144305581. Archived from the original on 3 October 2009. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  35. 1 2 Valdes, Francisco; Culp, Jerome McCristal; Harris, Angela P., eds. (2002). Crossroads, directions, and a new critical race theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 59, 65. ISBN   978-1566399302. Archived from the original on 30 July 2020. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  36. Browne, Anthony (2006). "The Retreat of Reason: Political Correctness and the Corruption of Public Debate in Modern Britain Archived 3 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine ". Civitas. ISBN   1903386500.
  37. 1 2 Bernstein, Richard (28 October 1990). "Ideas & Trends: The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 12 October 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  38. Cho, Sumi (1997). "Essential Politics". Harvard Law Review . 433.
  39. 1 2 McFadden, Robert D. (5 May 1991). "Political Correctness: New Bias Test?". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 23 October 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2017.
  40. D'Souza 1991
  41. Berman 1992
  42. Schultz 1993
  43. Messer Davidow 1993, 1994
  44. Scatamburlo 1998
  45. See:
  46. In The New York Times newspaper article "The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct", the reporter Richard Bernstein said that:
    The term "politically correct", with its suggestion of Stalinist orthodoxy, is spoken more with irony and disapproval than with reverence. But, across the country the term "P.C.", as it is commonly abbreviated, is being heard more and more in debates over what should be taught at the universities.
    The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct, NYT (28 October 1990) Bernstein, Richard (28 October 1990). "Ideas & Trends: The Rising Hegemony of the Politically Correct". The New York Times . Retrieved 22 May 2010.
    Bernstein also reported about a meeting of the Western Humanities Conference in Berkeley, California, on the subject of "Political Correctness" and Cultural Studies that examined "what effect the pressure to conform to currently fashionable ideas is having on scholarship". Western Humanities Conference Archived 15 December 2012 at archive.today
  47. 1 2 Kimball, Roger (1990). Tenured radicals : how politics has corrupted our higher education (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row – Originally The University of Michigan. ISBN   978-0060161903.
  48. For commentary see:
    • Lauter, Paul (1993). "'Political Correctness' and the Attack on American Colleges".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
    • Stimpson, Catharine R. (29 May 1991). "New 'Politically Correct' Metaphors Insult History and Our Campuses".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
    • James, Axtell (1998). The Pleasures of Academe: A Celebration & Defense of Higher Education.
    • Scatamburlo, Valerie L. (1998). Soldiers of Misfortune: The New Right's Culture War and the Politics of Political Correctness . ISBN   9780820430126.
    • Glassner, Barry (5 January 2010). The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things: Crime, Drugs, Minorities, Teen Moms, Killer Kids, Mutant Microbes, Plane Crashes, Road Rage, & So Much More.
  49. Tomlinson, Sally (2008). Race and education : policy and politics in Britain ([Online-Ausg.]. ed.). Maidenhead [u.a]: Open University Press. p. 161. ISBN   978-0335223077. Archived from the original on 30 July 2020. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  50. Dekker, Teun J. (2013). Paying Our High Public Officials: Evaluating the Political Justifications of Top Wages in the Public Sector. Research in Public Administration and Public Policy. Routledge. p. 119. ISBN   978-1135131265. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
  51. For Polly Toynbee see:
  52. Regarding Will Hutton see:
  53. Loury, G. C. (1 October 1994). "Self-Censorship in Public Discourse: A Theory of "Political Correctness" and Related Phenomena" (PDF). Rationality and Society . 6 (4): 428–61. doi:10.1177/1043463194006004002. S2CID   143057168. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 November 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  54. Hughes, Geoffrey. An encyclopedia of swearing: The social history of oaths, profanity, foul language, and ethnic slurs in the English-speaking world. Routledge, 2015, pp.348-349
  55. Heteren, Annette Gomis van (1997). Political correctness in context : the PC controversy in America. Almería: Universidad de Almería, Servicio de Publicaciones. p. 148. ISBN   978-8482400839. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
  56. D'Souza, Dinesh (1991). Illiberal education : the politics of race and sex on campus. New York: Free Press. ISBN   978-0684863849. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2015.
  57. "On the Follies of the Politically Correct Language Police | Psychology Today". www.psychologytoday.com. Archived from the original on 16 August 2022. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  58. Hess, Frederick M.; Maranto, Robert; Redding, Richard E. (2009). The politically correct university : problems, scope, and reforms. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press. ISBN   978-0844743172.
  59. Deresiewicz, William On Political Correctness Archived 2 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine , The American Scholar, 06/03/17, accessed 24/03/19
  60. Larson, Jennifer, Mark McNeilly, and Timothy J. Ryan. "Free Expression and Constructive Dialogue at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Archived 23 December 2020 at the Wayback Machine ." Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina (5 February 2020).
  61. Friedersdorf, Conor (16 February 2020). "Evidence That Conservative Students Really Do Self-Censor". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 11 November 2021. Retrieved 16 February 2020.
  62. See:
  63. Jay, Martin (2010), "Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment: The Frankfurt School as Scapegoat of the Lunatic Fringe". Salmagundi (Fall 2010–Winter 2011, 168–69): 30–40.
  64. Buchanan, Patrick. The Death of the West , p. 89.
  65. Lea, John (2010). Political Correctness and Higher Education: British and American Perspectives. Routledge. ISBN   978-1135895884. Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  66. McGowan, William (2003). Coloring the news : how political correctness has corrupted American journalism ([New postscript]. ed.). San Francisco, Calif.: Encounter Books. ISBN   978-1893554603.
  67. See:
  68. Sloan, David; Hoff, Emily (1998). Contemporary media issues. Northport: Vision Press, Indiana University. p. 63. ISBN   978-1885219107. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
  69. Wilson, John. 1995. The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on High Education. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. p. 7 ISBN   978-0822317135.
  70. "TidBits: The PC Manifesto". Fiction.net. Archived from the original on 7 October 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  71. "Book – Buy Now". Capc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 May 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  72. Anderson, Brian C. (Autumn 2003). "We're Not Losing the Culture Wars Anymore". City Journal . Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2007.
  73. For South Park's usage see:
  74. For Colbert's usage see:
  75. Bethell, Tom (2005). The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science. Washington, D.C: Regnery Publishing. ISBN   978-0895260314.
  76. Adams, Joshua (12 June 2017). "Time for equal media treatment of 'political correctness'". Columbia Journalism Review . Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
  77. Aly, Waleed; Simpson, Robert Mark (2018). "Political Correctness Gone Viral". In Fox, Carl; Saunders, Joe (eds.). Media Ethics, Free Speech, and the Requirements of Democracy. New York: Routledge. ISBN   9781138571921.
  78. Nowrasteh, Alex (7 December 2016). "The right has its own version of political correctness. It's just as stifling". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on 8 December 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2016.

Further reading