Reverse sexism

Last updated

Reverse sexism is a controversial term for discrimination against men and boys, or for anti-male prejudice. [1] [2] [3] The term has been used to claim that men have become the primary victims of sexism. [4] Specifically, opponents of affirmative action argue that men and boys are systematically discriminated against in employment and school admissions. [5]

Reverse sexism has been compared by sociologists to the concepts of "reverse racism" and "reverse ethnocentrism" in that both are a form of backlash by members of dominant groups (e.g., men, whites, or Anglos). [6] Reverse sexism is rebutted by analogy with the criticism of reverse racism as a response to affirmative action policies that are designed to combat institutionalized sexism and racism. [7] In more rigid forms, this stance assumes that the historic power imbalance in favor of men has been reversed, [8] and that women are now viewed as the superior gender or sex. [9]

Feminist theorist Florence Rush characterizes the idea of reverse sexism specifically as a misogynist reaction to feminism; men's rights activists such as Warren Farrell promote the idea of reverse sexism to argue that the feminist movement has rearranged society in such a way that it now benefits women and harms men. [10] In the preamble to a study on internalized sexism, Steve Bearman, Neill Korobov and Avril Thorne describe reverse sexism as a "misinformed notion", stating that "while individual women or women as a whole may enact prejudicial biases towards specific men or toward men as a group, this is done without the backing of a societal system of institutional power". [11]

See also

References

  1. Liotzis, Vangelis (2025). "The 'Reverse Sexism' Thesis: A Re-appraisal". Journal of Human Values. 31 (3): 278–290. doi:10.1177/09716858251322319. ISSN   0971-6858. [T]o date, [reverse sexism] has not been theorized adequately but has principally been controversial in the context of the digital public sphere and everyday discourse.
  2. Suedfeld, Peter (2002). "Postmodernism, Identity Politics, and Other Political Influences in Political Psychology". In Monroe, Kristen R. (ed.). Political Psychology. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 320–321. ISBN   978-1-135-64661-5 via Google Books.
  3. Johnson, Allan G. (1997). The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy . Philadelphia: Temple University Press. p. 170. ISBN   978-1-56639-518-2.
  4. Roden, Jessica (2022). "#MeToo Movement Backlash: How Evaluations of Women Advocates as More 'Sexist' Weaken Movement Support". Media Psychology. 25 (6): 763–778. doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2064877. ISSN   1521-3269. 'Reverse sexism' is the notion that men have replaced women as the victims of gender discrimination, despite ample evidence showing otherwise.
    • Masequesmay, Gina (2008). "Sexism". In O′Brien, Jodi (ed.). Encyclopedia of Gender and Society, Volume 2. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications. p. 750. ISBN   978-1-4522-6602-2 via Google Books. In a cultural backlash, the term reverse sexism also emerged to refocus on men and boys and their disadvantages, especially under affirmative action.
    • Masequesmay, Gina (11 June 2014). "Sexism | Sexism and the men's movement". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 17 March 2025.
  5. Renfrow, Daniel G.; Howard, Judith A. (2013). "Social Psychology of Gender and Race". In DeLamater, John; Ward, Amanda (eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. p. 496. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_17. ISBN   978-94-007-6772-0. There has also been some backlash, with members of majority categories sometimes asserting a reverse sexism (toward men), reverse racism (toward Whites), and/or reverse ethnocentrism (toward, say, Anglos).
  6. Garcia, J. L. A. (1997). "Racism as a Model for Understanding Sexism" . In Zack, Naomi (ed.). Race/Sex: Their Sameness, Difference and Interplay (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 46. doi:10.4324/9780203760604. ISBN   978-0-203-76060-4.
  7. "Sociological Abstracts: Supplement — Issues 67-77". International Review of Publications in Sociology: 202. 1977. ISSN   0038-0202.[ full citation needed ]
  8. Collins, Georgia; Sandell, Renee (1984). Women, art, and education. Reston, Va.: National Art Education Association. p. 14. ISBN   978-0-9376-5233-6.
  9. Rush, Florence (1990). "The Many Faces of Backlash". In Leidholdt, Dorchen; Raymond, Janice G. (eds.). The Sexual Liberals and the Attack on Feminism. Pergamon Press. pp. 168–169. ISBN   978-0-0803-7458-1.
  10. Bearman, Steve; Korobov, Neill; Thorne, Avril (2009). "The Fabric of Internalized Sexism" (PDF). Journal of Integrated Social Sciences. 1 (1): 10–47. ISSN   1942-1052.