Comments section

Last updated

The comments section is a feature on most online blogs, news websites, and other websites in which the publishers invite the audience to comment on the published content. This is a continuation of the older practice of publishing letters to the editor. Despite this, comments sections can be used for more discussion between readers. [1] [2]

Contents

History

Various methods have been used for written commentary on published works. In Germany during the 1500s it was common practice for academics to post copies of their ideas on public places, such as church doors (see for example Luther's Ninety-five Theses). Newspapers and magazines later came to publish letters to the editor. With the advent of computers, the bulletin board system allowed publication of information, and users to comment on or discuss posts.

The first online website to offer a comments section was Open Diary, which added reader comments shortly after its launch in October 1998. [3] Readers of blog posts on the site were able to post public or private comments to the authors directly on the page. The history of comment sections on news articles started in 1998 with The Rocky Mountain News , as they were one of the first newspapers to add online comments on the same page. [4]

While today comments sections are common, newspapers were hesitant to add them at first. [5] In the late 2000s, comments sections were rapidly added to news sites, between 2007 and 2008 there was a 42% growth in the number of top circulating news sites with comments sections. [4] In 2008, 75% of the top 100 most circulated newspapers had comments sections. [4] In 2010, The American Journalism Review stated that news sites should not have anonymous comments sections. [5] Following that statement Reuters, ESPN, The Huffington Post, Popular Science, Sporting News, and USA Today either made comments gated or removed them. [5] Online discourse is difficult to moderate. [6] Harassment and negative interactions are a growing trend which has led to the closing of many comments sections. [7]

Closing of comments sections

YouTube

In February 2019, YouTube began deleting and demonetizing channels and videos based on their comments section. [13] This came after Youtuber "MattsWhatItIs" made a video exposing a ring of videos exploiting minors. [14] He explained that videos featuring minors would have comments sections made up mostly of people making explicit and suggestive comments about those featured in the video and, in some cases, sharing links to child pornography. [13] [14] After advertisers began pulling ads off of the site, YouTube began deleting and demonetizing videos deemed "violating terms and services". [13] [14]

Types

There are two types of comment sections, gated and non-gated. Gated comments sections require users to give the website some information before they can post a comment. Many news websites such as The New York Times and most social media websites are gated, as users have to log in and post under a username that identifies them. [15] Comments sections can also be accessed in different ways, either directly attached to an article or video, or through a separate web page. [16] Websites such as The New York Times found that user participation increased when the comments section was located directly below. [16]

Non-gated comment sections don’t require users to provide information before posting. This lack of an entry barrier can allow more people to post and potentially lead to a discussion with more viewpoints covered. [15] This anonymity, however, is believed by some to lead to uncivil behavior and a higher likelihood of seeing or experiencing verbal aggression in the comments. [4] [5] In response to this, both the Illinois and New York State senates have considered bills to limit non-gated comment sections. [5] The Illinois bill would have incentivized websites to gate their comments requiring users to provide their real name, a home address and a confirmed IP address. [5] The New York Bill would have made websites remove anonymous commenting. [5]

Behavior and moderation

Comments section across the internet have gained a reputation for being rude, argumentative, and being generally described as "toxic". [1] Toxic comments refer to rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comments that are likely to make one leave a discussion. Comments sections have been known for frequent arguing and disagreements. [17] The reason for this may be due to the fact that those with strongly-held beliefs are more likely to comment and reply to others when the comments section is widely opposed to them. [17] Likewise, users tend to stay silent when their views are widely supported. [17] Furthermore, thanks to the internet's principle element being the ability to stay anonymous, many people realise they can be more aggressive to others without fear of real-world accountability. In addition to this, people are more likely to comment on news articles when they are more personally affected. [18] Participation in comments is usually low in frequency, as most will only comment on articles twice, and are more likely to comment on issues that have a determinable end. [18]

If a comment section is moderated, it is typically done in any one of the three ways: post-moderation, pre-moderation, or through a flagging system. [15] Comments that are post-moderated are checked after they've been posted. Pre-moderated comments are checked before they are made publicly visible. [15] This is typically performed by an automatic filtering tool. [19] Comments that are moderated with a flagging system can be marked, or "flagged", by other users for official website moderators to look at. [15] In some cases, both the publishers and users can offer varying degrees of moderation in comments sections through voting systems and reporting options. [1]

In February 2017, Google-founded technology incubator Jigsaw unveiled a tool based on artificial intelligence, called Perspective API, to identify toxic comments in online forums. [20]

In September 2017, Disqus, a company that provides comment-hosting services, analysed over 92 million comments written by 2 million people over 16 months, on about 7,000 forums that used its service, and concluded that 25% of all commenters made at least one toxic comment. The study was carried out using Google's Perspective API. In the United States, the time of the day at which maximum proportion of comments were toxic was 3 am. [21] However, Engadget denounced the underlying API, bringing attention to its discriminatory classifications – phrases like "I am a gay black woman" were scored as 87% toxic. It described the algorithm as "sexist, racist and ableist".

Comments sections have often been known for containing highly sexist and misogynistic statements. [22] In a study involving feminist articles on several news websites, it was found that many were not supportive or contributing to the feminist subject. [22] Many comments were found to be intentionally combative and considered some form of Internet trolling. [22] Comments sections have become a modern arena for racism. [23] Abusive language and hate speech have increased on Instagram. [24]

Good moderation of news websites is expensive. [25] However, most news sites do moderate. [26] Studies of newspaper website and blog comments have shown incivility to be present in as many as 25% of comments. [27] Most publishers and writers have been found to tolerate and accept incivility in the comments section. [1] This is due to the fact that incivility is subjective, and to remove those comments can lead to accusations of bias and unfair censorship. [1] On the other hand, the presence of toxic comments on a news article tends to reduce the perceived credibility of the main article, which has led many news websites since 2013 to remove their comments sections. [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

Flaming, also known as roasting, is the act of posting insults, often including profanity or other offensive language, on the internet. Flaming is distinct from trolling, which is the act of someone causing discord online or in person. Flaming emerges from the anonymity that Internet forums provide for users and which allow them to act more aggressively. Anonymity can lead to disinhibition, which results in the swearing, offensive, and hostile language characteristic of flaming. Lack of social cues, less accountability of face-to-face communications, textual mediation and deindividualization are also likely factors. Deliberate flaming is carried out by individuals known as flamers, which are specifically motivated to incite flaming. These users specialize in flaming and target specific aspects of a controversial conversation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Troll (slang)</span> Person who sows discord online

In slang, a troll is a person who posts deliberately offensive or provocative messages online or who performs similar behaviors in real life. The methods and motivations of trolls can range from benign to sadistic. These messages can be inflammatory, insincere, digressive, extraneous, or off-topic, and may have the intent of provoking others into displaying emotional responses, or manipulating others' perception, thus acting as a bully or a provocateur. The behavior is typically for the troll's amusement, or to achieve a specific result such as disrupting a rival's online activities or purposefully causing confusion or harm to other people. Trolling behaviors involve tactical aggression to incite emotional responses, which can adversely affect the target's well-being.

Slashdot is a social news website that originally billed itself as "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters". It features news stories on science, technology, and politics that are submitted and evaluated by site users and editors. Each story has a comments section where users can add online comments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kuro5hin</span> Technology-related discussion website (1999–2016)

Kuro5hin was a collaborative discussion website founded by Rusty Foster in 1999, having been inspired by Slashdot. Articles were created and submitted by users and submitted to a queue for evaluation. Site members could vote for or against publishing an article and once the article had reached a certain number of votes, it was published to the site or deleted from the queue. The site has been described as "a free-for-all of news and opinion written by readers". Around 2005, its membership numbered in the tens of thousands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet forum</span> Online discussion site

An Internet forum, or message board, is an online discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages. They differ from chat rooms in that messages are often longer than one line of text, and are at least temporarily archived. Also, depending on the access level of a user or the forum set-up, a posted message might need to be approved by a moderator before it becomes publicly visible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Content moderation</span> System to sort undesirable contributions

On websites that allow users to create content, content moderation is the process of detecting contributions that are irrelevant, obscene, illegal, harmful, or insulting, in contrast to useful or informative contributions, frequently for censorship or suppression of opposing viewpoints. The purpose of content moderation is to remove or apply a warning label to problematic content or allow users to block and filter content themselves.

Plastic.com (2001–2011) was a general-interest internet forum running under the motto 'Recycling the Web in Real Time'.

Incivility is a general term for social behaviour lacking in civility or good manners, on a scale from rudeness or lack of respect for elders, to vandalism and hooliganism, through public drunkenness and threatening behaviour. The word "incivility" is derived from the Latin incivilis, meaning "not of a citizen".

Newsvine was a community-powered, collaborative journalism online newspaper which drew content from its users and syndicated content from mainstream sources such as The Associated Press. Users could write articles, "seed" links to external content, and discuss news items in an online forum. These news items were submitted by both users and professional journalists. Newsvine, the company, was not a news bureau and exercised no editorial voice, but provided social news platform for the online community which had grown around it. Members decided with their online actions what news articles stay on the site and what news is removed. Newsvine was named the Top News Site of 2006 and one of the 50 Best Websites of 2007 by Time magazine.

An anonymous post, is an entry on a textboard, anonymous bulletin board system, or other discussion forums like Internet forum, without a screen name or more commonly by using a non-identifiable pseudonym. Some online forums such as Slashdot do not allow such posts, requiring users to be registered either under their real name or utilizing a pseudonym. Others like JuicyCampus, AutoAdmit, 2channel, and other Futaba-based imageboards thrive on anonymity. Users of 4chan, in particular, interact in an anonymous and ephemeral environment that facilitates rapid generation of new trends.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gatekeeping (communication)</span> Filtering process in communication

Gatekeeping is the process through which information is filtered for dissemination, whether for publication, broadcasting, the Internet, or some other mode of communication. The academic theory of gatekeeping may be found in multiple fields of study, including communication studies, journalism, political science, and sociology. Gatekeeping originally focused on the mass media with its few-to-many dynamic. Currently, the gatekeeping theory also addresses face-to-face communication and the many-to-many dynamic inherent on the Internet. Social psychologist Kurt Lewin first instituted Gatekeeping theory in 1943. Gatekeeping occurs at all levels of the media structure—from a reporter deciding which sources are presented in a headline story to editors choosing which stories are printed or covered. Including, but not limited to, media outlet owner and advertisers.

Arts journalism is a branch of journalism concerned with the reporting and discussion of the arts including, but not limited to, the visual arts, film, literature, music, theater, and architecture.

The online disinhibition effect refers to the lack of restraint one feels when communicating online in comparison to communicating in-person. People tend to feel safer saying things online that they would not say in real life because they have the ability to remain completely anonymous and invisible when on particular websites, and as a result, free from potential consequences. Apart from anonymity, other factors such as asynchronous communication, empathy deficit, or individual personality and cultural factors also contribute to online disinhibition. The manifestations of such an effect could be in both positive and negative directions; thus, online disinhibition could be classified as either benign disinhibition or toxic disinhibition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital journalism</span> Editorial content published via the Internet

Digital journalism, also known as netizen journalism or online journalism, is a contemporary form of journalism where editorial content is distributed via the Internet, as opposed to publishing via print or broadcast. What constitutes digital journalism is debated by scholars; however, the primary product of journalism, which is news and features on current affairs, is presented solely or in combination as text, audio, video, or some interactive forms like storytelling stories or newsgames, and disseminated through digital media technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paywall</span> System that prevents Internet users from accessing webpage content without a paid subscription

A paywall is a method of restricting access to content, with a purchase or a paid subscription, especially news. Beginning in the mid-2010s, newspapers started implementing paywalls on their websites as a way to increase revenue after years of decline in paid print readership and advertising revenue, partly due to the use of ad blockers. In academics, research papers are often subject to a paywall and are available via academic libraries that subscribe.

On the social news site Reddit, some communities are devoted to explicit, violent, propagandist, or hateful material. These subreddits have been the topic of controversy, at times receiving significant media coverage. Journalists, attorneys, media researchers, and others have commented that such communities shape and promote biased views of international politics, the veracity of medical evidence, misogynistic rhetoric, and other disruptive concepts.

/pol/, short for Politically Incorrect, is an anonymous political discussion imageboard on 4chan. As of 2022, it is the most active board on the site. It has had a substantial impact on Internet culture. It has acted as a platform for far-right extremism; the board is notable for its widespread racist, white supremacist, antisemitic, Islamophobic, misogynist, and anti-LGBT content. /pol/ has been linked to various acts of real-world extremist violence. It has been described as one of the "[centers] of 4chan mobilization", a title also ascribed to /b/.

PhysicsOverflow is a physics website that serves as a post-publication open peer review platform for research papers in physics, as well as a collaborative blog and online community of physicists. It allows users to ask, answer and comment on graduate-level physics questions, post and review manuscripts from ArXiv and other sources, and vote on both forms of content.

Social media as a news source is the use of online social media platforms rather than moreover traditional media platforms to obtain news. Just as television turned a nation of people who listened to media content into watchers of media content in the 1950s to the 1980s, the emergence of social media has created a nation of media content creators. Almost half of Americans use social media as a news source, according to the Pew Research Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iamhere (social movement)</span> International movement to counteract hate speech and misinformation on social media

#iamhere, also spelt #IAmHere, is a social movement that uses counter-speech to counter hate speech and misinformation on social media, mainly Facebook. It began as a Swedish Facebook group called #jagärhär, and the umbrella organisation for the movement is iamhere international, is headquartered in Sweden. Each affiliate is named in the language of the country, such as #IchBinHier in Germany, and followed by the country name when in English, such as #iamhere India.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Muddiman, Ashley; Stroud, Natalie (2017). "News Values, Cognitive Biases, and Partisan Incivility in Comments Sections". Journal of Communication. 67 (4): 586–609. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12312 .
  2. ↑ Scott, A. O. (May 5, 2024). "In the Comments Section, Writerly Discourse Awaits - A critic for the Book Review finds joy — and inspiration — in engaging with readers via the comments forums on his articles". The New York Times . Archived from the original on May 6, 2024. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  3. ↑ Erard, Michael (20 September 2013). "No Comments". The New York Times. Retrieved 2018-08-06.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Chen and Pain, Gina Masullo and Paromita (2017). "Normalizing Online Comments". Journalism Practice. 11 (7): 876–892. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1205954. S2CID   147879372.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wallsten, Kevin; Tarsi, Melinda (2016). "Persuasion from Below?". Journalism Practice. 10 (8): 1019–1040. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1102607. S2CID   146967882.
  6. ↑ Ntini, Eric; Mangeya, Hugh (2020-04-02). "A Dialogic Analysis of Audiences' Interactions on Online Media Sites in Zimbabwe". Communicatio. 46 (2): 64–80. doi:10.1080/02500167.2020.1762687. ISSN 0250-0167.
  7. ↑ Anderson, Monica (2014-11-20). "About 1 in 5 victims of online harassment say it happened in the comments section". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2024-04-26.
  8. 1 2 3 Green, Matthew (January 24, 2018). "No Comment! Why More News Sites Are Dumping Their Comment Sections". KQED . Archived from the original on 2018-10-22. Retrieved 2021-06-11.
  9. ↑ Smith, Jonathan (20 December 2016). "We're Getting Rid of Comments on VICE.com". Vice. Vice Media . Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  10. ↑ Jensen, Elizabeth (17 August 2016). "NPR Website To Get Rid Of Comments". NPR.org. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  11. ↑ Perez, Sarah (3 February 2017). "One of the worst comments sections on the internet is shutting down". TechCrunch. Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  12. ↑ Fischer, Sara (Jul 6, 2023). "MediaNews Group ends online comments for all newspapers". Axios . Retrieved 2023-08-03.
  13. 1 2 3 Shaban, Hamza (2019). "Youtube axes tens of millions of comments in crackdown on child sexual exploitation". The Washington Post.
  14. 1 2 3 Schwartz, Matthew (2019). "Advertisers Abandon Youtube Over Concerns That Pedophiles Lurk In Comments Section". NPR.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Steele, Noelle (2013). Trolls Under the Bridge: Anonymous online comments and gatekeeping in the digital realm (Master of Arts). ProQuest   1823607220.
  16. 1 2 Cynthia Peacock; Joshua M Scacco; Natalie Jomini Stroud (2017-07-04). "The deliberative influence of comment section structure - Cynthia Peacock, Joshua M Scacco, Natalie Jomini Stroud, 2019". Journalism. doi:10.1177/1464884917711791. S2CID   148648760.
  17. 1 2 3 Duncan, Megan; Pelled, Ayellet; Wise, David; Ghosh, Shreenita; Shan, Yuanliang; Zheng, Mengdian; McLeod, Doug (2020-01-01). "Staying silent and speaking out in online comment sections: The influence of spiral of silence and corrective action in reaction to news". Computers in Human Behavior. 102: 192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.026 . hdl: 10919/111595 . ISSN   0747-5632.
  18. 1 2 Patrick Weber (2013-07-08). "Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers' reader comments - Patrick Weber, 2014" (PDF). New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444813495165. S2CID   12046040.
  19. ↑ Russmann, Uta; Hess, Andreas (2023-03-16). "The Management of Uncivil and Hateful User Comments in Austrian News Media". Journalism Practice: 1–20. doi:10.1080/17512786.2023.2189152. ISSN 1751-2786.
  20. ↑ Wakabayashi, Daisuke (23 February 2017). "Google Cousin Develops Technology to Flag Toxic Online Comments". The New York Times. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  21. ↑ Bénichou, Lo. "Trolls Across America: Mapping the Most and Least Troll-Ridden Places in the U.S." WIRED. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
  22. 1 2 3 Kruschek, Gina (2019-12-01). "Stigma in the Comments Section: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Discussions Online". Computers and Composition. 54: 102515. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102515. ISSN   8755-4615. S2CID   202783120.
  23. ↑ Loke, Jaime (2012-07-20). "Public Expressions of Private Sentiments: Unveiling the Pulse of Racial Tolerance through Online News Readers' Comments". Howard Journal of Communications. 23 (3): 235–252. doi:10.1080/10646175.2012.695643. ISSN 1064-6175.
  24. ↑ Martutik; Santoso, Anang; Rani, Abdul; Prastio, Bambang; Maulidina, Ahsani (2024-12-31). "Exploring flaming in the discourse of negative judgment: invoked strategies used by Indonesian netizens in Instagram comments". Cogent Arts & Humanities. 11 (1). doi:10.1080/23311983.2024.2333601. ISSN 2331-1983.
  25. ↑ Wang, Shan (18 October 2016). "When are comments sections of news sites worth keeping alive? What are some options for taming them?". Nieman Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism . Retrieved 18 April 2017.
  26. ↑ WAN-IFRA (2016). The 2016 Global Report on Online Commenting. http://www.wan-ifra.org/reports/2016/10/06/the-2016-global-report-on-online-commenting
  27. ↑ Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments: Incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64, 658-679. doi:10.1111/jcom.12104
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.