Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform

Last updated

The Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) is an economics-oriented publishing and education centre based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [1]

Contents

Organization

COMER was co-founded by William Krehm [2] and John Hotson in the 1980s as a think tank out of concern for the "debt-based monetary system" described as unsustainable. [3] COMER says it studies the destabilization that current economic and monetary policies have caused, and are causing, for the citizens of Canada and other countries. COMER argues for a mixed economy, and changes in monetary policy through what it argues is the mandate under the Bank of Canada Act . Ann Emmett is the chair of the organization. [1]

Lawsuit against Bank of Canada

In 2011, COMER brought a lawsuit against the Canadian Government. [2] [1] COMER claimed that the Bank of Canada is mandated under the Bank of Canada Act to provide debt-free support for public projects undertaken by federal, provincial and city governments, as it did from its foundation in 1935 to 1974. [1] In order for them to join the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Canada has had to stop this policy. COMER argues that this move meant that Canada had unconstitutionally given up control over its ability to set its independent monetary policy to "secret" deliberations and control of the private foreign bankers at the BIS. [1] The organization is represented by Rocco Galati. [1] [4]

On August 9, 2013, COMER's claim was struck without leave to amend by Prothonotary Kevin R. Aalto. No costs were awarded. [5]

In 2014, on appeal, Judge Russell of the Federal court ruled that the claim should be struck in its entirety. He did grant leave to amend the claim. [6] This ruling was appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal by COMER over the ruling itself and cross appealed by the Crown over the granting of leave to amend the claim.

On January 26, 2015, the Federal Court of Appeal heard the appeals, and dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal without costs. COMER was given 60 days to file an amended statement of claim. [7]

COMER filed an amended statement of claim on March 26, 2015. On April 24 the Crown filed for an order striking the claim and dismissing the action. Arguments for and against the Crown motion were heard by Justice Russell on October 14, 2015. On February 8 in his ruling Justice Russell struck COMER's amended claim in its entirety and refused leave to amend the claim. Costs were awarded to the Crown. In his ruling, Justice Russell stated "their response convinces me that, for reasons given, they have no scintilla of a cause of action that this Court can or should hear." [8]

On March 3, 2016, COMER filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeal. [9]

On December 7, 2016, the Federal Court of appeal heard this latest appeal, and dismissed it with costs. [10]

On February 1, 2017 COMER filed an application for leave to appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada. [11]

On May 4, 2017 the Supreme Court dismissed COMER's application for leave to appeal. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

The False Claims Act (FCA), also called the "Lincoln Law", is an American federal law that imposes liability on persons and companies who defraud governmental programs. It is the federal government's primary litigation tool in combating fraud against the government. The law includes a qui tam provision that allows people who are not affiliated with the government, called "relators" under the law, to file actions on behalf of the government. This is informally called "whistleblowing", especially when the relator is employed by the organization accused in the suit. Persons filing actions under the Act stand to receive a portion of any recovered damages.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

Patriation is the political process that led to full Canadian sovereignty, culminating with the Constitution Act, 1982. The process was necessary because under the Statute of Westminster 1931, with Canada's agreement at the time, the British parliament had retained the power to amend Canada's Constitution Acts, and to enact more generally for Canada at the request and with the consent of the Dominion. That authority was removed from the UK by the enactment of the Canada Act 1982 on March 29, 1982, by the Parliament of the United Kingdom, as requested by the Parliament of Canada.

Garth Howard Drabinsky is a Canadian film and theatrical producer and entrepreneur. In 2009, he was convicted and sentenced to prison for fraud and forgery. The sentence was reduced from 7 to 5 years in prison, on appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear a subsequent appeal.

In Canadian law, a reference question or reference case is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an advisory opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation.

Rocco Galati is an Italian-born Canadian lawyer who specializes in cases involving constitutional law.

<i>R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co is an early constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Constitution's Trade and Commerce power.

<i>Oakwell Engineering Ltd v Enernorth Industries Inc</i>

Oakwell Engineering Ltd v Enernorth Industries Inc was an appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario by Enernorth Industries Inc. (Enernorth), a Canadian company, from a judgment of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granting an application brought by Oakwell Engineering Limited (Oakwell), a Singaporean company, for an order recognizing and enforcing in Ontario a judgment granted against Enernorth by the High Court of Singapore on October 16, 2003 and affirmed by the Court of Appeal of Singapore on April 27, 2004.

The Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan is the superior trial court for the Canadian province of Saskatchewan.

Helmut Oberlander German-Ukrainian alleged Nazi war criminal (1924–2021)

Helmut Oberlander was a naturalized Canadian citizen who was a member of the Einsatzgruppen death squads of Nazi Germany in the occupied Soviet Union during World War II. Oberlander was on the Simon Wiesenthal Center's list of most wanted Nazi war criminals. Beginning in 1994, the Government of Canada made several attempts to revoke Oberlander's citizenship on the basis of his misrepresenting his involvement with Nazi war crimes.

Hate speech laws in Canada Canadian laws relating to hate speech

Hate speech laws in Canada include provisions in the federal Criminal Code, as well as statutory provisions relating to hate publications in three provinces and one territory.

Section 121 of the Constitution Act, 1867 Provision of the Canadian Constitution

Section 121 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada relating to the entry of goods from one province into another.

<i>Canada v GlaxoSmithKline Inc</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Canada v GlaxoSmithKline Inc is the first ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada that deals with issues involving transfer pricing and how they are treated under the Income Tax Act of Canada ("ITA").

<i>Teva Canada Ltd v Pfizer Canada Inc</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Teva Canada Ltd v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the disclosure requirements for a patent in Canada.

<i>Daniels v Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development)</i> 2016 Supreme Court of Canada case

Daniels v Canada , 2016 SCC 12 is a case of the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that Métis and non-status Indians are "Indians" for the purpose of s 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

<i>Hryniak v Mauldin</i> Case of the Supreme Court of Canada

Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 is a landmark case of the Supreme Court of Canada that supports recent reforms to Canadian civil procedure in the area of granting summary judgment in civil cases.

<i>Canadian National Railway Co v Canada (AG)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Canadian National Railway Co v Canada (AG), 2014 SCC 40 is a significant case from the Supreme Court of Canada in the area of Canadian administrative law, focusing on whether the standard of review framework set out in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick applies to decisions of the Governor in Council of Canada, and whether it has authority to vary or rescind an administrative tribunal decision on questions of law or jurisdiction.

Robert P. Armstrong Canadian lawyer and retired judge

Robert Patrick Armstrong is a Canadian lawyer and retired judge. He served on the Court of Appeal for Ontario from 2002 until his retirement in 2013. Before serving on the bench, Armstrong was a partner at Torys and was lead counsel in the Dubin Inquiry on steroid use in Canadian sports. After leaving the bench, Armstrong joined Arbitration Place, a Canadian group specializing in alternative dispute resolution.

William Krehm was a Canadian author, journalist, political activist and real estate developer. He was a prominent Trotskyist activist in the 1930s and went to Spain where he participated in the Spanish Civil War. In the 1980s he co-founded the Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) in the 1980s and continued as the group's principal leader until his death. He died in April 2019 at the age of 105.

<i>York University v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

York University v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency , 2021 SCC 32 is a major decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the matters of the effectiveness of copyright collectives and of fair dealing in Canadian copyright law.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Whittington, Les (2015-03-23). "Renowned Toronto lawyer brings unusual case to change the way Canada's central bank operates". The Toronto Star. ISSN   0319-0781 . Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  2. 1 2 Popplewell, Brett (2008-05-17). "He has participated in some of the most important events of the 20th century. Now, at 93, William Krehm is preparing for one final march unto the breach". The Toronto Star. ISSN   0319-0781 . Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  3. ↑ "About Comer" (PDF). Comer.org. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
  4. ↑ "Meet the lawyer who's suing the Bank of Canada to loan out free money". CBC News. Retrieved 2016-02-23.
  5. ↑ "Committee For Monetary v. Canada, 2013 FC 855 (CanLII)". Canadian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2016-03-24.
  6. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen, 2014 FC 380". Federal Court. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  7. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen, 2015 FCA 20 (CanLII)". Canadian Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
  8. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen, 2016 FCA 147 (CanLII)". Canadian Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on 2016-08-17. Retrieved 2016-12-05.
  9. ↑ "COMMITTEE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC REFORM ("COMER") ET AL v. HMQ ET AL". Federal Court Proceedings. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  10. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen, 2016 FCA 312". Federal Court. Retrieved 2016-12-19.
  11. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen,". Supreme Court. Retrieved 2017-04-18.
  12. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen,". Supreme Court. Retrieved 2017-05-04.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.