Rocco Galati

Last updated
Rocco Galati
Born1959
Calabria, Italy
NationalityCanadian
OccupationLawyer
OrganizationConstitutional Rights Centre
Website https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca/

Rocco Galati (born 1959) is an Italian-born Canadian lawyer who specializes in cases involving constitutional law. [1] He is the founder and executive director of the Constitutional Rights Centre. [2] [3]

Contents

Early life and education

Galati was born in Calabria, Italy and his family immigrated to Canada in 1965. [4] He graduated from McGill University in 1984 with a Bachelor of Arts and then graduated from Osgoode Hall Law School in 1987.

Career

After his Call to the bar he worked at the federal Department of Justice.[ citation needed ]

Criminal cases

In 2001, Galati defended Delmart Vreeland at trial. [5]

Galati was Abdurahman Khadr's first lawyer. [6] In late 2003, Galati resigned from all national security cases after being the target of death threats. [6] Galati said a threat left on his answering machine stated: "Well, Mr. Galati. What's this I hear about you working with the terrorist now, helping to get that (expletive) punk terrorist Khadr off. You a dead wop." Galati requested 24-hour surveillance of his house; when the RCMP refused to provide this, he declared that "we now live in Colombia because the rule of law is meaningless" and later indicated he believed the call came from American intelligence. Mr Galati went on to claim: "The voice is similar and likely the same as a voice of someone who threatened one of our former clients," he said, adding later that "in that case, our client disappeared."' [7] [8] Galati later characterized the threats as "institutional" and "governmental" but did not elaborate. [6]

In 2006, Galati represented Ahmad Mustafa Ghany, a suspect in the 2006 Ontario terrorism plot. [9] In 2008, charges were stayed against Ghany and three other defendants. [9]

Nadon challenge

On October 7, 2013, Galati brought a court application that challenged the appointment of Justice Marc Nadon to the Supreme Court of Canada on the basis of Nadon being ineligible as under the Quebec provisions of the Supreme Court Act. [10] [11] [12] The Act requires that three members of the Supreme Court be from Quebec. The Quebec government announced that it would also challenge Nadon's appointment. [12]

The government responded to Galati's application on October 22, 2013 by amending the Supreme Court Act and bringing a reference question to the Supreme Court. [12] Galati was granted intervenor status at the hearing. [12]

On March 21, 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 that Nadon was ineligible under the Quebec provisions of the Act, and that changes to the Act required unanimous constitutional amendment. [12] [13] Nadon's appointment was voided. [13] The court did not accept Galati's argument that federal court judges from Quebec are not eligible for appointment to the permanent Quebec seats on the Supreme Court of Canada. [11] Galati agreed to end his own legal challenge following the ruling. [14]

The Federal Court of Canada later awarded Galati $5,000 for his fees in bringing his application. [14] Galati appealed, arguing he should be awarded $51,706.54 for his time spent arguing the case. [14] The Federal Court of Appeal disagreed, and issued a sharply worded decision that compared his arguments to the "gonzo logic of the Vietnam War era." [14] [15] The court ruled that Galati and his legal partner Paul Slansky were not legally successful in their application, even if they may have initiated a series of events leading to the reference question. [14] Galati and Slansky were ordered to pay $1,000 in legal costs to the government. [14]

Mainville challenge

After the Supreme Court ruled against the Nadon appointment, in June 2014 Galati brought an application challenging the appointment of Justice Robert Mainville to the Quebec Court of Appeal. [16] In April 2015, the court ruled unanimously that the justice department acted within its constitutional powers in the Mainville appointment. [17]

Bank of Canada case

In 2011, Galati brought a case against the Canadian government to restore the Bank of Canada as a lender to the government. [18] The case was brought on behalf of the Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform. [18] COMER argued that the Bank of Canada is mandated to provide debt-free financing for public projects undertaken by federal, provincial and municipal governments. [18]

COMER's claims were struck five times by the courts. On May 4, 2017, the Supreme Court dismissed COMER'S application for leave to appeal the most recent decision. [19]

On February 8, 2016 Justice Russell struck COMER's amended claim in its entirety and refused leave to amend the claim. Costs were awarded to the crown. In his ruling, Justice Russell stated "their response convinces me that, for reasons given, they have no scintilla of a cause of action that this Court can or should hear." [20]

On March 3, 2016 COMER filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeal. [19]

On December 7, 2016 the appeal was dismissed. [21] On May 4, 2017 the Supreme Court dismissed COMER's application for leave to appeal this decision. [22]

COVID-19

Galati has been a vocal opponent of COVID-19 vaccines and government measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. [23] In this regard, he has represented a range of individuals and organizations. Examples include Dr. Rochagné Kilian of Owen Sound, who is part of a group of Ontario doctors accused of freely dispensing vaccine exemptions, Action4Canada and Vaccine Choice Canada. [23] [24] [25]

On July 6, 2020, Galati filed a lawsuit on behalf of Vaccine Choice Canada challenging Canada's provincial and national COVID-19 response. Among the named defendants were the Government of Canada, Government of Ontario, the City of Toronto, and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). [26] Galati was also involved in the preparation of a lawsuit against COVID-19 vaccine mandates at the University of Waterloo, in coordination with the Canadian chapter of Children's Health Defense. [27] Prospective plaintiffs were instructed to prepare to pay $2,000 to join the suit, and that they may be "on the hook" for an additional $2,000 if the suit was unsuccessful. [28]

In January 2022, Galati was seriously ill in the ICU. [23]

In August 2022, Justice Alan Ross of the Supreme Court of British Columbia struck a COVID-19 vaccine mandate lawsuit brought by Galati against the Government of British Columbia, describing the claim as "bad beyond argument". [25] [29] Among other issues, Justice Ross noted in his decision that the civil claim included "improper allegations, including criminal conduct and ‘crimes against humanity.’" [24] A similar suit was struck by Federal Court Judge Simon Fothergill in February 2023 on the same grounds. [30]

In March 2023, Galati filed a class action lawsuit against the Regional Municipality of York and York Regional Police on behalf of employees fired or placed on leave as a result of the municipality's mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy. [29]

On December 11, 2023, Justice William Chalmers of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by Galati against multiple defendants, including the Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy (CSASPP), finding that the suit was intended to silence criticism of a proposed class action lawsuit related to COVID-19 restrictions. [31] [32]

On December 18, 2024, another proposed class action suit brought by Galati was rejected by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on the grounds that it lacked a reasonable cause of action, constituted an abuse of process, and that the court had no jurisdictional authority over the matter. [33] The suit was brought on behalf of 473 plaintiffs, many of whom were unionized and had not exhausted the mandatory arbitration process. [34]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Canada</span> Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Canada</span>

Same-sex marriage was progressively introduced in several provinces and territories of Canada by court decisions beginning in 2003 before being legally recognized nationwide with the enactment of the Civil Marriage Act on July 20, 2005. On June 10, 2003, the Court of Appeal for Ontario issued a decision immediately legalizing same-sex marriage in Ontario, thereby becoming the first province where it was legal. The introduction of a federal gender-neutral marriage definition made Canada the fourth country in the world, and the first country outside Europe, to legally recognize same-sex marriage throughout its borders. Before the federal recognition of same-sex marriage, court decisions had already introduced it in eight out of ten provinces and one of three territories, whose residents collectively made up about 90 percent of Canada's population. More than 3,000 same-sex couples had already married in those areas before the Civil Marriage Act was passed. In 2023, polling by Pew Research suggested that more than three-quarters of Canadian residents supported the legal recognition of same-sex marriage. Most legal benefits commonly associated with marriage had been extended to cohabiting same-sex couples since 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Beverley McLachlin</span> Chief Justice of Canada from 2000 to 2017

Beverley Marian McLachlin is a Canadian jurist and author who served as the 17th chief justice of Canada from 2000 to 2017. She is the longest-serving chief justice in Canadian history and the first woman to hold the position.

The Committee on Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) is an economics-oriented publishing and education centre based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

<i>M v H</i> Supreme Court of Canada case on same-sex couples

M v H [1999] 2 S.C.R. 3, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the rights of cohabiting same-sex couples to equal treatment under the law. The court found that the definition of spouse in section 29 of Ontario's Family Law Act, which extended spousal support rights to unmarried cohabiting opposite-sex couples but not same-sex couples, was discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Premiership of Stephen Harper</span>

The premiership of Stephen Harper began on February 6, 2006, when the first Cabinet headed by Stephen Harper was sworn in by Governor General Michaelle Jean. Harper was invited to form the 28th Canadian Ministry and become Prime Minister of Canada following the 2006 federal election, where Harper led his Conservative Party to win a plurality of seats in the House of Commons of Canada, defeating the Liberal government of Prime Minister Paul Martin. Harper led his Conservatives to win a larger minority government in 2008, and then a majority government in 2011. In the 2015 federal election, Harper's Conservatives lost power to a Liberal majority government led by Justin Trudeau.

Judicial appointmentsin Canada are made by the federal government or provincial government. Superior and federal court judges are appointed by federal government, while inferior courts are appointed by the provincial government.

Marc Nadon LL.L. is a supernumerary judge on the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal. He has practised law in both Quebec and the United Kingdom, focusing on maritime and transportation law. He was also an arbitrator and former lecturer in law at the Université de Sherbrooke. Nadon was nominated by Prime Minister Stephen Harper to be a puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada in October 2013. Following controversy about the appointment, the federal government referred the constitutionality of the appointment to the Supreme Court of Canada. In their decision in Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6, the Supreme Court quashed his appointment, concluding he did not meet the eligibility criteria provided in the Supreme Court Act.

Michael Moldaver is a former Canadian judge. He was a puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada from his 2011 appointment by former Prime Minister Stephen Harper until his retirement in 2022. Before his elevation to the nation's top court, he served as a judge at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal for Ontario for over 20 years. A former criminal lawyer, Moldaver is considered an expert in both Canadian criminal law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Wagner (judge)</span> Chief Justice of Canada since 2017

Richard Wagner is a Canadian jurist serving as the 18th and current Chief Justice of Canada since 2017. He previously served as a puisne justice of the Quebec Court of Appeal (2011–2012) and of the Supreme Court of Canada (2012–2017). For several months in 2021, following Julie Payette's resignation as Canada's governor general, Wagner was the administrator of the government of Canada as well as chief justice.

<i>Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6</i> Canadian constitutional law case – SCC

Reference ReSupreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, 2014 SCC 21 is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada concerning the eligibility of members of the Quebec courts and the Quebec Bar to be appointed to the three seats on the Supreme Court reserved for Quebec. The case also considers the constitutional status of the Supreme Court, holding that the Court has been constitutionally entrenched by the Constitution Act, 1982, and that the composition of the Court, including eligibility for appointment, can only be amended by unanimous consent of the House of Commons, Senate and all provincial legislative assemblies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms</span> Canadian legal advocacy organization

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) is a Canadian legal advocacy organization specializing in a social conservative approach to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The libertarian organisation has partnered with several right-wing backers in the United States.

Paul D.K. Fraser was a Canadian lawyer from British Columbia. He served as the Conflict Commissioner for the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia as well as the president of the Canadian Bar Association (1981–1982), the Commonwealth Lawyers Association (1993–1996), and of the Canadian section of the International Commission of Jurists. He also chaired a review of pornography and prostitution laws for the government of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vaccine Choice Canada</span> Canadian anti-vaccination group

Vaccine Choice Canada (VCC) is Canada's main anti-vaccination group. It was founded in 1986 under the name Association for Vaccine Damaged Children, became the Vaccination Risk Awareness Network in 1994 and adopted its current name in 2014. The group has been contributing to vaccine hesitancy in Canada, encouraging citizens to forgo immunization and legislators to support anti-vaccine regulations and legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">COVID-19 vaccination in Canada</span> COVID-19 vaccination programme in Canada

COVID-19 vaccination in Canada is an ongoing, intergovernmental effort coordinated between the bodies responsible in the Government of Canada to acquire and distribute vaccines to individual provincial and territorial governments who in turn administer authorized COVID-19 vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Provinces have worked with local municipal governments, hospital systems, family doctors and independently owned pharmacies to aid in part, or in full with vaccination rollout. The vaccination effort in full is the largest such immunization effort in the nation's history. The vaccination effort began December 14, 2020, and is currently ongoing.

<i>Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General)</i> 2021 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada

Toronto (City) v Ontario , 2021 SCC 34, is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on freedom of expression and unwritten constitutional principles. By a 5–4 majority, the court held that the Government of Ontario's decision to reduce the size of the Toronto City Council in the middle of 2018 municipal election campaign did not violate either section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the unwritten principle of democracy. The court further held that unwritten constitutional principles could not serve as an independent basis to invalidate legislation.

COVID-19 vaccination mandates in Canada are the responsibility of provinces, territories, and municipalities, and in the case of federal public services and federally-regulated transportation industries, the federal government. COVID-19 vaccines are taxpayer funded in Canada and made available free of charge through the public health care system. The federal government is responsible for procurement and distribution of the vaccines to provincial and territorial authorities; provincial and territorial governments are responsible for administering vaccinations to people in their respective jurisdictions. Mass vaccination efforts began across Canada on December 14, 2020. As the second vaccinations became more widely available in June 2021, Manitoba became the first province in Canada to offer a voluntary vaccine passport.

The following article is a broad timeline of the course of events surrounding the Canada convoy protest, a series of protests and blockades in Canada in early 2022. The protest, which was called the Freedom Convoy by organizers, was "first aimed at a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for cross-border truckers" when the convoy of hundreds of vehicles, including semi-trailers, headed towards Ottawa, Ontario the nation's capital, starting on January 22. The protesters quickly changed their messaging to include demands that all COVID-19-related public health restrictions be lifted.

Michelle O'Bonsawin is a Canadian jurist who is serving as a puisne justice on the Supreme Court of Canada since 2022. Before her appointment to the Supreme Court, she served as a judge on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice from 2017 to 2022. O'Bonsawin is the first Indigenous Canadian to serve as a Supreme Court justice.

References

  1. ↑ Hagan, Trevor (March 21, 2014). "Nadon challenger Rocco Galati wonders why he had to clean up 'mess'". CBC News . The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on December 26, 2022.
  2. ↑ Butler, Colin (May 4, 2021). "Group of Ontario police officers launches charter challenge of pandemic restrictions". CBC News . Archived from the original on May 4, 2021.
  3. ↑ "About Us". Constitutional Rights Centre. Archived from the original on October 11, 2020. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  4. ↑ Fine, Sean (August 22, 2014). "The lawyer who challenged the Harper government and won". The Globe and Mail . Archived from the original on August 23, 2014.
  5. ↑ "United States of America v. Vreeland". February 8, 2002. Archived from the original on October 4, 2002.
  6. 1 2 3 Quan, Douglas (July 4, 2014). "Lawyer who defended a Khadr and challenged Nadon appointment did it all to mess with the 'government machine'". National Post . Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  7. ↑ "Terror suspect lawyer quits cases over threat". CTV News . December 5, 2003.[ dead link ]
  8. ↑ Bourdeau, Valérie (February 2012). "Intimidation of Justice System Participants: General Overview of Literature and Reports" (PDF). Department of Justice Canada . p. 23. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 7, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  9. 1 2 Teotonio, Isabel (April 15, 2008). "Four have terror charges stayed". The Toronto Star . ISSN   0319-0781. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  10. ↑ Cheadle, Bruce (November 10, 2013). "Harper's sixth Supreme Court nomination leads to rare legal mess at top bench". National Post . The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on November 12, 2013.
  11. 1 2 "CanLII - 2014 SCC 21 (CanLII)".
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Kilpatrick, Sean (May 8, 2014). "The failed Supreme Court nomination of Marc Nadon: How it happened". CBC News . The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  13. 1 2 Payton, Laura (March 21, 2014). "Stephen Harper's Supreme Court pick Marc Nadon ruled not eligible". CBC News . Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Perkel, Colin (February 9, 2016). "Court Slams Lawyers Who Challenged Harper's Top Court Pick". The Huffington Post . The Canadian Press. Archived from the original on February 10, 2016.
  15. ↑ Perkel, Colin (2016-02-09). "Court slams 'gonzo logic' in nixing money claim over Harper judge battle". Times Colonist . Archived from the original on 2016-02-10. Retrieved 2016-02-10.
  16. ↑ Fitz-Morris, James; MacKinnon, Leslie (June 16, 2014). "Lawyer who sank Nadon's Supreme Court appointment challenges Quebec court pick". CBC News . Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
  17. ↑ Fine, Sean (April 27, 2015). "Supreme Court approves Robert Mainville judicial appointment". The Globe and Mail . Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved May 6, 2021.
  18. 1 2 3 Whittington, Les (2015-03-23). "Renowned Toronto lawyer brings unusual case to change the way Canada's central bank operates". The Toronto Star . ISSN   0319-0781. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved July 14, 2016.
  19. 1 2 "COMMITTEE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC REFORM ("COMER") ET AL v. HMQ ET AL". Federal Court Proceedings. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-07-14.
  20. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform (COMER) v. The Queen, 2016 FCA 147 (CanLII)". Canadian Legal Information Institute . February 8, 2016. Archived from the original on August 17, 2016. Retrieved July 14, 2016.
  21. ↑ "Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform v. Canada". Federal Court of Appeal. 10 September 2013. Retrieved 2017-01-02.
  22. ↑ "Judgments in Leave Applications". Supreme Court of Canada . May 4, 2017. Archived from the original on August 31, 2018. Retrieved May 4, 2017.
  23. 1 2 3 Mandel, Michele (January 7, 2022). "MANDEL: Anti-vaxx doctors fight investigation into their issuing vaccine exemptions". Toronto Sun . Archived from the original on January 8, 2022.
  24. 1 2 Dacre, Colin (September 1, 2022). "COVID-mandate lawsuit tossed for being 'bad beyond argument'". Business in Vancouver . Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
  25. 1 2 "Action4Canada v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2022 BCSC 1507 (CanLII)". Canadian Legal Information Institute . August 29, 2022. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  26. ↑ Butler, Colin (August 13, 2020). "Details emerge of Vaccine Choice Canada lawsuit over coronavirus response". CBC News . Archived from the original on January 4, 2024.
  27. ↑ "Open letter to UW officials: Repeal the COVID vaccination and testing mandates". University of Waterloo . August 26, 2021. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  28. ↑ "Update on the lawsuit against university mandates" (PDF). University of Waterloo . Archived (PDF) from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
  29. 1 2 Quigley, Joseph (March 6, 2023). "Region, police named in $126M class action vaccine mandate lawsuit". NewmarketToday. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  30. ↑ Johansen, Nicholas (February 24, 2023). "Massive lawsuit challenging COVID vaccination requirement for federal workers tossed by court". CastaNet. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  31. ↑ "Galati v. Toews et al, 2023 ONSC 7508 (CanLII)". Canadian Legal Information Institute . 2023-12-11. Archived from the original on 2024-02-17. Retrieved 2024-02-17.
  32. ↑ Blackwell, Tom (2024-02-15). "Controversial lawyer ordered to pay $132,000 to fellow lockdown foes". National Post . Archived from the original on 2024-02-15. Retrieved 2024-02-15.
  33. ↑ "Dorceus v. Ontario et al., 2024 ONSC 7087 (CanLII)". CanLII . Ontario Superior Court of Justice. 2024-12-18. Archived from the original on 2024-12-30. Retrieved 2024-12-30.
  34. ↑ Coxson, Doug (2024-12-27). "Hospital workers who refused COVID vaccine lose court battle". Sudbury.com. Archived from the original on 2024-12-30. Retrieved 2024-12-30.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.