Communication apprehension

Last updated
Don't Panic Silhouette Silhouette-114436 1920.jpg
Don't Panic Silhouette

Communication apprehension is a degree or measure of the anxiety triggered by the real or anticipated communication act, as defined by James C. McCroskey. [1] The fear of judgment from the audience and self-image are two factors which fuel the anxiety. [2] Since communication can be oral or written, communication apprehension (CA) is divided into oral communication apprehension (OCA) and written communication apprehension (WCA). [3]

Contents

Communication apprehension can cause a variety of involuntary responses such as "stomach butterflies" which is your body shutting the digestive system down and going into the fight-or-flight response, shaking, nausea, sweating, forgetting the information, among many others.

The term oral communication apprehension is usually connected with stage fright; [4] however, this response is not necessarily connected with a delivery on a stage or in front of a large audience. [5] This anxiety can be caused by any of the four forms of communication: interpersonal, group, public, and mass communication. [6]

The most common and reliable test used to measure an individual's OCA level when exposed to these forms of communication is called the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension, also known as the PRCA-24 test, and it follows a survey format. [7] [8] WCA is commonly measured using versions of the WCA questionnaire developed by Daly and Miller. [9]

Types

There are different types of communication apprehension, each of these types represent a specific or general situation that presents a stimuli for this anxiety response. McCroskey argues that there are four types of communication apprehension:

Trait anxiety

Trait anxiety is considered a personality type, which represents that the individual has an orientation to feel anxiety during the communication act regardless of the situation, audience or context. [10] This type of people will avoid exposing themselves to a communication situation, since their communication apprehension is part of their daily behavior. [6]

McCroskey and Beatty argue that some people have a higher vulnerability factor for communication apprehension due to genetics, also known as communibiology. [11] Many researchers oppose this idea and argue that it cannot be solely inherited but rather a personality trait acquired; therefore, it can be changed. However, they can compromise that around 80% of communication apprehension is obtained within our neurological structures, which are determined genetically. Furthermore, only 20% is influenced by an environmental stimulus. [12] [11] Meaning that this type of communication apprehension can be improved with practice and other techniques; however, it will not be eliminated since it is inherited. [12]

Context anxiety

Context anxiety triggers communication apprehension due to a specific context. This is considered a psychological response caused by a specific context but not necessarily on others; a person can have no problem talking to her best friend but can get anxiety while talking in front of a class. The most known example for context anxiety is public speaking; almost 70% of students have a certain level of communication apprehension triggered by public speaking. [6] There are other contexts that can create a similar response such as speaking in front of class, small group discussions, or meetings. [5]

Audience anxiety

Audience anxiety is when a specific individual or group of people creates a problem on communication, or a reverse reaction. For some people, anxiety can be caused by familiar peers, while for others it can be caused by unfamiliar faces. [6] At the beginning of a speech class, the students tend to be fearful since they see new faces which increases the levels of communication apprehension. However, once the students get to know each other they feel comfortable; decreasing or eliminating their levels of apprehension. [13]

Situation anxiety

Situational anxiety is a psychological reaction of a person due to a specific situation that may not have any relation with the person or context. [10] This anxiety is triggered by a special combination of audience and context that involves different dimensions and creates a unique scenario. [2] For an example, on a first date a person may not have communication apprehension; however, the situation of being with a person that they have feelings for, on a new environment, and being the first time they experience this situation, can increase the stress levels and create communication apprehension.

Treatments

Peer Practice has been proven to be effective in combatting speech anxiety. A dissertation [14] written by a doctoral candidate studied the effect of peer practice on high school students. The study showed that peer practice was statistically significant in reducing overall CA in high school students. Students who did not utilize peer practice had higher overall levels of CA.  Another study [15] agrees with these findings and also stated that the presence of an audience is important while practicing because it provides an engaged audience for the speaker and provide constructive criticism which also helps the speaker prepare for speech day.  This study also showed the benefits of tutoring while also using peer practice which is also another way the speaker can receive feedback and improve on their speech so their anxiety level will be lowered.

Virtual Reality, VR, has also been a great help to those struggling with CA. Virtual Reality Therapy is a technology that enables users to enter computer-generated worlds and interact with them through sight, sound, and touch.[ citation needed ] VR may provide them with a sense of mastery or self-efficacy and, in turn, result in improved perception of performance and satisfaction with performance. [16] The VR Practice can help with the anxiety that is caused be CA and help the speaker feel more prepared overall. Often VR is used as exposure therapy in conjunction with Cognitive Behavior Therapy, CBT, to treat public speaking anxiety. [14]

Drug Therapies and meditation have also been successful in treating CA. SSRI's have been found to be successful treatment for speech anxiety. [15] SSRI's are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors which are used to treat depression and anxiety and that is why they are an option to treat speech anxiety. Vitamin C has also been shown to lessen the anxiety from CA. The results of a study indicated a possible role of vitamin C in decreasing the physiological signs of stress. [17] Meditation has been found to help significantly reduce anxiety in speakers naturally. One Study found that the speakers who did not meditate had increased stress even after multiple trials they did not have a habituation-related decreased level of stress. [18]

PRCA

The PRCA-24 is a test created to determine the communication comfort level of a speaker. [8] This test shows that communication apprehension is not limited to public speaking since it includes different situations that can trigger anxiety, these situations belong to an apprehension triggered by context, context anxiety. [13] The four situations that are presented on the test are: group discussion, meetings, interpersonal, and public speaking. [6] Currently, the PRCA-24 is the most preferred and reliable test above all others. [19] Recently, however, research conducted by Croucher, et al. [20] questioned the multi-national sustainability of the PRCA-24 and suggest more research was needed in different countries. Many different factors contribute to the accurateness of the results. The validity of the PRCA-24 should not be generally queried in intercultural contexts, the results should be interpreted with caution. While numerous national cultures have been studied, many are still left unexplored. [21] However, Hsiao [22] and Bankole, [23] who utilized this tool in foreign countries, have suggested that modifications to the PRCA-24 would make it more appropriate for non-western cultures.

This test provides an easy equation to obtain a score for each category, these scores are compared to the ranges provided at the end of the test; these ranges were obtained by a study of over 40,000 college students and over 3,000 non-students adults provided on a national sample. [1] By this comparison, the test taker can determine their level of communication apprehension for each scenario, ranking them with a low, moderate or high level of apprehension. The test is able to provide a diagnostic of context anxiety and overall communication apprehension by simply adding the sub scores and comparing the total score. Results of administration of the PRCA-24 in a variety of contexts generally reveal public speaking to be the mode of oral communication which generating the highest levels of apprehension. [8] [24]

Typical behavioral patterns

There are three typical behavioral patterns found in people who have a high level of CA.

Communication avoidance can be seen when people lead their lives in a way that avoids any communication as it would bring them discomfort. For example, they will avoid jobs that involve a lot of communication or choose to live in areas where the chances of communication opportunities are lower. [25]

The second behavioral pattern comes into play when people with CA are faced with a circumstance where they were not able to use communication avoidance. In this case, the individual would use communication withdrawal, which can be utter silence or the absolute minimal communication. Examples are only speaking when spoken to or to answer questions and keeping responses short. [25] The nonverbal messages, including standing or sitting away from others, frowning, avoiding eye contacts and standing with arms folded, can signal to others that a person is not interested in communicating and tend to reduce communication initiation attempts from others. [26]

The third behavioral pattern is communication disruption when a person with CA attempts to communicate, however, the discomfort is shown with their verbal disfluencies and poor communicative strategies. It happens when an attempt is made to take on an uncomfortable situation that involves communication. [27] It is often shown in the form of influent and unnatural or inappropriate verbal and nonverbal behaviors, all reflecting their CA. [28]

Notes and references

  1. 1 2 McCroskey, James C.; Beatty, Michael J. (1986). "Oral Communication Apprehension" (PDF). Shyness. pp. 279–293. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0525-3_21. ISBN   978-1-4899-0527-7.
  2. 1 2 "Publisher Information". Stand up, Speak out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking. University of Minnesota. 8 November 2016.
  3. ↑ Byrne, Marann; Flood, Barbara; Shanahan, Dan (2012). "A Qualitative Exploration of Oral Communication Apprehension". Accounting Education. 21 (6): 565–581. doi:10.1080/09639284.2012.725636. S2CID   143124970.
  4. ↑ McCroskey, James C. (1982). "Oral Communication Apprehension: A Reconceptualization" (PDF). In Burgoon, Michael (ed.). Communication Yearbook 6. pp. 136–170. doi:10.4324/9780203856246. ISBN   978-0-203-85624-6.
  5. 1 2 Holbrook, Hilary Taylor (1987). Communication Apprehension: The Quiet Student in Your Classroom (Report). ERIC   ED284315.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Dwyer, Karen Kangas (1 January 1995). Communication apprehension and individual learning style preference: Correlations and dimensions (Thesis). ProQuest   304210263.
  7. ↑ Payton, Karl E.; Scott, Joyce A. (2013). "Communication Apprehension among Homeschooled College Freshmen". FOCUS on Colleges, Universities & Schools. 7 (1): 1–10.
  8. 1 2 3 Shanahan, Dan (2012). "Oral Communication Apprehension: an Exploration in Addressing Fear of Public Speaking". Teaching Fellowships 31.
  9. ↑ Byrne, Marann; Flood, Barbara; Shanahan, Dan (2009). "Communication apprehension among business and accounting students in Ireland" (PDF). Accounting, Finance & Governance Review. 16 (2). doi:10.52399/001c.26996.
  10. 1 2 Witt, Paul L.; Brown, Kennaria C.; Roberts, James B.; Weisel, Jessica; Sawyer, Chris R.; Behnke, Ralph R. (April 2006). "Somatic Anxiety Patterns Before, During, and After Giving a Public Speech". Southern Communication Journal. 71 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1080/10417940500503555. S2CID   144416877.
  11. 1 2 McCroskey, James C.; Beatty, Michael J. (January 2000). "The communibiological perspective: Implications for communication in instruction". Communication Education. 49 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/03634520009379187. S2CID   144098520.
  12. 1 2 Boren, Justin; Veksler, Alice (1 January 2011). "A Decade of Research Exploring Biology and Communication". Communication.
  13. 1 2 Dwyer, Karen; Carlson, Robert; Dalbey, Jennifer (1 January 2003). "Impact of High School Preparation on College Oral Communication Apprehension". Basic Communication Course Annual. 15 (1).
  14. 1 2 Bowman, Ashley (1 May 2018). The Effect of Peer Practice on Communication Apprehension in High School Students: A Quantitative, Quasi-Experimental, Static-Group Study (Thesis).
  15. 1 2 Knight, Misty L.; Johnson, Karen Gabrielle; Stewart, Frances (2016). "Reducing Student Apprehension of Public Speaking: Evaluating Effectiveness of Group Tutoring Practices". Learning Assistance Review. 21 (1): 21–54.
  16. ↑ Villani, Daniela; Rotasperti, Chiara; Cipresso, Pietro; Triberti, Stefano; Carissoli, Claudia; Riva, Giuseppe (2017). "Assessing the Emotional State of Job Applicants Through a Virtual Reality Simulation: A Psycho-Physiological Study". EHealth 360°. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. Vol. 181. pp. 119–126. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49655-9_16. ISBN   978-3-319-49654-2.
  17. ↑ Al-fahham, Ali A (September 2019). "Effect of low dose vitamin C on public speaking stress during group presentation". Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1294 (6): 062054. Bibcode:2019JPhCS1294f2054A. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1294/6/062054 . S2CID   208443394.
  18. ↑ Hoge, Elizabeth A.; Bui, Eric; Palitz, Sophie A.; Schwarz, Noah R.; Owens, Maryann E.; Johnston, Jennifer M.; Pollack, Mark H.; Simon, Naomi M. (April 2018). "The effect of mindfulness meditation training on biological acute stress responses in generalized anxiety disorder". Psychiatry Research. 262: 328–332. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.006. PMC   5526744 . PMID   28131433.
  19. ↑ Aneakpoonsinsuk, Panyaporn (2017). Communication apprehension among Thai customs personnel at International Airports in Thailand (PDF) (Thesis).
  20. ↑ Croucher, Stephen M.; Kelly, Stephanie; Rahmani, Diyako; Jackson, Kelsea; Galy-Badenas, Flora; Lando, Agnes; Chibita, Monica; Nyiranasbimana, Venantie; Turdubaeva, Elira; Eskiçorapçı, Nadirabegim; Condon, Shawn Michael; Stanalieva, Gulzada; Orunbekov, Bakyt (15 April 2019). "A multi-national validity analysis of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension (PRCA-24)". Annals of the International Communication Association. 43 (3): 193–209. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1602783. S2CID   150515836.
  21. ↑ Rahmani, Diyako; Croucher, Stephen (2017). "Minority Groups and Communication Apprehension". Journal of Intercultural Communication. 2017 (43).
  22. ↑ Hsiao, Tsung-Yuan (August 2010). "Testing Rival Measurement Models of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension in Two Taiwanese Samples". Psychological Reports. 107 (1): 127–139. doi:10.2466/02.07.11.20.PR0.107.4.127-138. PMID   20923056. S2CID   38182225.
  23. ↑ Bankole, Emmanuel Temitope (1 April 2019). "Communication Apprehension, Age, and Education as Predictors of Marital Conflict Among Couples in Ado- Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria". Nigerian Journal of Social Psychology. 2 (1).
  24. ↑ Shanahan, Dan (2013). "High oral communication apprehensives: How can students be helped to reduce their fear of public speaking". Irish Journal of Academic Practice. 2 (1).
  25. 1 2 McCroskey, James (1986). "The Communication Apprehension Perspective" (PDF). In Daly, J. A.; McCroskey, J. C. (eds.). Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications. pp. 13–38.
  26. ↑ Anxiety of EFL employees when using English oral communication at workplaces in Hong Kong and in Bangkok, Thailand. Thammasat University. 2016. OCLC   1085452894.[ page needed ]
  27. ↑ Richmond, Virginia P. (2013). McCroskey, James C.; Wrench, Jason S. (eds.). Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. ISBN   9780205118045. OCLC   779877111.
  28. ↑ Babapoor, Maryam; Seifoori, Zohreh; Chehreh, Mahtaj (1 September 2018). "Intermediate EFL Learners' Shyness, Communication Apprehension, the Accuracy and Fluency of their Oral Performance". Research in English Language Pedagogy. 6 (2): 205–222. doi:10.30486/relp.2018.542580.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anxiety</span> Unpleasant state of inner turmoil over anticipated events

Anxiety is an emotion which is characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil and includes feelings of dread over anticipated events. Anxiety is different from fear in that fear is defined as the emotional response to a real threat, whereas anxiety is the anticipation of a future threat. It is often accompanied by nervous behavior such as pacing back and forth, somatic complaints, and rumination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acting</span> Story telling by enacting a character

Acting is an activity in which a story is told by means of its enactment by an actor who adopts a character—in theatre, television, film, radio, or any other medium that makes use of the mimetic mode.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public speaking</span> Performing a speech to a live audience

Public speaking, also called oratory, is the act or skill of delivering speeches on a subject before a live audience.

Glossophobia or speech anxiety is the fear of public speaking. The word glossophobia derives from the Greek γλῶσσα glossa (tongue) and φόβος phobos The causes of glossophobia are uncertain but explanations include communibiology and the illusion of transparency. Further explanations range from nervousness produced by a lack of preparation to, one of the most common psychiatric disorders, social anxiety disorder (SAD).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Listening</span> Hearing what others are saying, and trying to understand what it means

Listening is giving attention to a sound. When listening, a person hears what others are saying and tries to understand what it means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English as a second or foreign language</span> Use of English by speakers with different native languages

English as a second or foreign language is the use of English by speakers with different native languages, often with students whose native language is not English and are learning to speak and write English, commonly among students Language education for people learning English may be known as English as a foreign language (EFL), English as a second language (ESL), English for speakers of other languages (ESOL), English as an additional language (EAL), or English as a New Language (ENL), which refers to the practice of studying English in a country where it is not the dominant language. These programs, especially ESL, are usually an academic subject, course, or program designed to teach English to students who are not yet proficient in the language. While some people only refer to learning in an English-speaking country, learning this language can also entail learning in a non-English speaking or non-native nation.

Communicative language teaching (CLT), or the communicative approach (CA), is an approach to language teaching that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of study.

Selective mutism (SM) is an anxiety disorder in which a person who is otherwise capable of speech becomes unable to speak when exposed to specific situations, specific places, or to specific people, one or multiple of which serving as triggers. This is caused by the freeze response. Selective mutism usually co-exists with social anxiety disorder. People with selective mutism stay silent even when the consequences of their silence include shame, social ostracism, or punishment.

The evaluation apprehension theory was proposed by Nickolas B. Cottrell in 1972. He argued that we quickly learn that the social rewards and punishments that we receive from other people are based on their evaluations of us. On this basis, our arousal may be modulated. In other words, performance will be enhanced or impaired only in the presence of persons who can approve or disapprove of our actions.

Systematic desensitization, or graduated exposure therapy, is a behavior therapy developed by the psychiatrist Joseph Wolpe. It is used when a phobia or anxiety disorder is maintained by classical conditioning. It shares the same elements of both cognitive-behavioral therapy and applied behavior analysis. When used in applied behavior analysis, it is based on radical behaviorism as it incorporates counterconditioning principles. These include meditation and breathing. From the cognitive psychology perspective, cognitions and feelings precede behavior, so it initially uses cognitive restructuring.

Willingness to communicate (WTC) was originally conceptualised for first language acquisition, and seeks to demonstrate the probability that a speaker will choose to participate in a conversation of their own volition. Traditionally, it was seen as a fixed personality trait that did not change according to context. However, McCroskey and associates suggested that it is in fact a situational variable that will change according to a number of factors.

Communication accommodation theory (CAT) is a theory of communication developed by Howard Giles. This theory concerns "(1) the behavioral changes that people make to attune their communication to their partner, (2) the extent to which people perceive their partner as appropriately attuning to them." The basis of the theory lies in the idea that people adjust their style of speech to one another. Doing this helps the message sender gain approval from the receiver, increases efficiency in communication between both parties, and helps the sender maintain a positive social identity. This theory is concerned with the links between language, context, and identity. It focuses on both the intergroup and interpersonal factors that lead to accommodation, as well as the ways that power, macro- and micro-context concerns affect communication behaviors; emphasizing the important duplexity of both factors in predicting and understanding intergroup interactions. Accommodation is usually considered to be between the message sender and the message receiver, but the communicator also often accommodates to a larger audience – either a group of people that are watching the interaction or society in general. Communication accommodation theory (CAT) predicts and explains why communicants make adjustments to increase, decrease, or maintain social distance.

Test anxiety is a combination of physiological over-arousal, tension and somatic symptoms, along with worry, dread, fear of failure, and catastrophizing, that occur before or during test situations. It is a psychological condition in which people experience extreme stress, anxiety, and discomfort during and/or before taking a test. This anxiety creates significant barriers to learning and performance. Research suggests that high levels of emotional distress have a direct correlation to reduced academic performance and higher overall student drop-out rates. Test anxiety can have broader consequences, negatively affecting a student's social, emotional and behavioural development, as well as their feelings about themselves and school.

Communibiology is a term referring to a research paradigm that emphasizes the "neurobiological foundations of human communication behavior". Communibiologists take the nature side of the nature versus nurture debate in communication development. The communibiological paradigm was developed by Beatty and McCroskey as an alternative to the nature side supporting social learning paradigm. They believe genetics to be far more important in the development of communication behavior than learning processes and the environment. These researchers do concede, however, that genetic factors are not the sole source of communication behavior. One accepted ratio is 20% influence of cultural, situational, or environmental stimuli and 80% influence of inborn, neurobiological structures on behavior.

Speech and language impairment are basic categories that might be drawn in issues of communication involve hearing, speech, language, and fluency.

Foreign language anxiety, also known as xenoglossophobia, is the feeling of unease, worry, nervousness and apprehension experienced in learning or using a second or foreign language. The feelings may stem from any second language context whether it is associated with the productive skills of speaking and writing or the receptive skills of reading and listening.

Peer feedback is a practice where feedback is given by one student to another. Peer feedback provides students opportunities to learn from each other. After students finish a writing assignment but before the assignment is handed in to the instructor for a grade, the students have to work together to check each other's work and give comments to the peer partner. Comments from peers are called as peer feedback. Peer feedback can be in the form of corrections, opinions, suggestions, or ideas to each other. Ideally, peer feedback is a two-way process in which one cooperates with the other.

Fear of negative evaluation (FNE) or fear of failure, also known as atychiphobia, is a psychological construct reflecting "apprehension about others' evaluations, distress over negative evaluations by others, and the expectation that others would evaluate one negatively". The construct and a psychological test to measure it were defined by David Watson and Ronald Friend in 1969. FNE is related to specific personality dimensions, such as anxiousness, submissiveness, and social avoidance. People who score high on the FNE scale are highly concerned with seeking social approval or avoiding disapproval by others and may tend to avoid situations where they have to undergo evaluations. High FNE subjects are also more responsive to situational factors. This has been associated with conformity, pro-social behavior, and social anxiety.

Language power (LP) is a measure of the ability to communicate effectively in a given language, specifically one that is not native to the speaker.

Donald W. Klopf was an American intercultural communication researcher and speech communication educator. He was Professor Emeritus in the Department of Speech at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and in the Department of Communication Studies at West Virginia University. He was nationally and internationally known as the father of communication studies in the Pacific-Asian region.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.