Condit Hydroelectric Project

Last updated
Condit Dam Condit Dam.jpg
Condit Dam

Condit Hydroelectric Project was a development on the White Salmon River in the U.S. state of Washington. It was completed in 1913 to provide electrical power for local industry, and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places as an engineering and architecture landmark.

Contents

PacifiCorp decommissioned the project due to rising environmental costs, and the dam was intentionally breached on October 26, 2011. [1] Condit Dam was the largest dam ever removed in the United States until the Elwha Ecosystem Restoration Project on the Olympic Peninsula removed the larger Elwha Dam and Glines Canyon Dam.

Overview and history

Map of the Condit Hydroelectric Project Condit Hydroelectric Project.png
Map of the Condit Hydroelectric Project

The White Salmon is a glacier-fed river originating on the slopes of Mount Adams and emptying into the Columbia River. Condit Dam is about 3.3 miles (5.3 km) upstream of the confluence. The area below the dam is part of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area, while parts of the river upstream belong to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers system. The area is famous for its natural environment and recreational activities such as whitewater rafting and fishing.[ citation needed ] Impoundment of the river in 1911 removed 33 miles (53 km) of steelhead habitat and 14 miles (23 km) of salmon habitat.

The Condit Hydroelectric Project, named after its lead engineer B.C. Condit, was built by Northwestern Electric Company in 1913. During the construction, all 242 workers at the project went on strike and voted unanimously for the strike to be managed by the Industrial Workers of the World. [2] [3] Their demands were 25-cent per day pay raise, better food and accommodations, and an end to discrimination against the workers. [4]

Once complete, electricity was primarily supplied to the Crown Willamette Paper Company in Camas, Washington, and surplus power was sold to Portland customers via a power line across the Columbia River. The project was acquired in 1947 by its current owner, PacifiCorp. [5]

The facility consisted of Condit Dam 45°46′02″N121°32′16″W / 45.76722°N 121.53778°W / 45.76722; -121.53778 in Klickitat County, and its impoundment, Northwestern Lake; a woodstave pipeline that transported water to a surge tank and auxiliary spillway; two penstocks; and the powerhouse. Two horizontally mounted Francis turbines and generators produced electrical power, and the exhausted water rejoined the river about a mile downstream of the dam.

The original design had fish ladders, which were twice destroyed by floods shortly after the dam's completion. The Washington State Fisheries Department then required Northwestern Electric to participate in a fish hatchery instead of rebuilding the fish ladders. This ended natural salmonid migration on the river.

In 1996, the federal government ordered PacifiCorp to alter the dam and add fish ladders to meet environmental codes. PacifiCorp deemed the modifications too expensive, and asked to decommission the dam, instead. The project operated under annual license extensions until the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved decommissioning. The dam was breached at noon (Pacific Time) on October 26, 2011 then was removed completely. [6]

At the time, it was the largest U.S. dam to be removed. The Elwha Ecosystem Restoration Project on the Olympic Peninsula has since removed the larger Elwha and Glines Canyon Dams.

Plant operations and specifications

River flow

Condit Dam was required to discharge at least 15 ft³/s (0.4 m³/s) to keep the river channel viable. Surplus water was used by the turbines for electrical power generation and returned to the river about a mile downstream. Additional flow beyond what the turbines could use was discharged through five tainter gates and two sluice gates. The dam crest had a pneumatically actuated hinged crest gate, which was designed to fail catastrophically as a safety relief when flow exceeds 18000 ft³/s (510 m³/s). The river averages 1125 ft³/s (32 m³/s), with flows up to 3500 ft³/s (99 m³/s) being fairly common.

Power production

The two turbines could use a maximum of 1,400 ft³/s (40 m³/s) and operate efficiently with as little as 1,100 ft³/s (31 m³/s). In this flow range, the plant operated as a run-of-river project. Inflow equaled outflow, and both turbines operated continuously to supply base load electricity.

When river flow was not quite enough for two turbines, operation was cycled between running one and both turbines, based on a daily reservoir draw-down and refill cycle. The cycling was timed to meet peak electrical demands; both turbines operated during hours of high electrical demand and the reservoir was drawn down. A single turbine operated during low electrical demand hours while the reservoir refilled. A similar cycle was used when inflow was less than enough for a single turbine. A weekly cycle was superimposed on the daily cycle that tended to draw down the reservoir during the week and allowed it refill during the weekend. In these cases, known as load factoring, the plant operated as a peaking plant. This mode of operation was greatly reduced through the 1980s and 1990s to appease lakefront cabin owners.

Licensing

Condit Powerhouse Condit Powerhouse.jpg
Condit Powerhouse

According to Federal Power Act of 1920, hydropower producers are periodically required to apply for license renewal from FERC. Condit's license was last reviewed in 1991, when it failed approval, and expired in 1993. From 1993 until 2011, PacifiCorp operated the plant under annual license extensions while it sought approval from FERC for the decommissioning. [7]

In December 2005, PacifiCorp filed an appeal of FERC's 1991 license rejection under the Bush administration's 2005 energy bill, which allows power producers to challenge licensing requirements retroactively. PacifiCorp explained the appeal as a backup plan in case decommissioning application failed. [8]

Specifications [9] [10]
FERC number2342
Dam type Gravity dam, 471 feet (144 m) long, 125 feet (38 m) high
LocationMile 3.3 (km 5.3)
Concrete used for construction30,000 cubic yards (23,000 m³)
Floodgates Five Tainter, two sluice, one hinged crest gate
Pipeline13.5 ft (4.1 m) dia, 5,100 ft (1,600 m) long, wood stave
Penstocks 2 x 9 ft (2.7 m) dia x 650 ft (200 m), steel and wood stave
Turbines 2 x Francis
Tailraceconcrete lined, 350 ft (110 m)
Maximum generating capacity14.7 MW
Maximum turbine hydraulic capacity1400 ft³/s (40 m³/s)
Hydraulic head 167.8 ft (51.1 m)
Operation modespeaking or baseload, depending on available flow
Normal lake maximum elevation above SL295.2
Reservoir capacity1,300 acre⋅ft (1.6 million m3)
Useful reservoir storage capacity665 acre⋅ft (820 thousand m3)
Surface area92 acres (370 thousand m2)
Average annual energy production (1936–1989)79,700 MWh
Annual operating costs$400,000
Annual power benefits$2,896,000
Annual value of power at consumer rates$4.8 million ($0.06/kWh)

Decommissioning

FERC proposals

After PacifiCorp's license application failed in 1993, FERC prepared an environmental impact statement that proposed installation of a state-of-the-art fish passage system as conditions for license renewal. The enhancements were to include fish ladders to allow upstream migrations of spawning salmon, and other modifications of the dam and operating procedures to allow a 95% survival rate of downstream migrating salmon. These conditions were based on National Marine Fisheries Service requirements. FERC's report also reviewed options to decommissioning the project, which it estimated would cost twice as much as the fish passage system. [11]

The investment needed to comply with the new requirements was estimated at $30 to $50 million, while at the same time reducing the amount of water available for power production. [12] PacifiCorp decided the project was no longer economically viable, and began negotiations for decommissioning. In 1999, PacifiCorp announced an agreement had been reached, at which point they applied to FERC for approval. The plan called for dam removal to begin in 2006 and capped PacifiCorp's liability at $17.5 million. In 2005, they applied for an operating extension to 2008, to earn another $3.3 million to help offset the cost of dam removal. The main parties involved in negotiations were federal regulatory bodies such as the National Marine Fisheries Service, Native American tribal governments with interests in the area, and a number of local and national environmental groups. [13]

PacifiCorp proposal

PacifiCorp's decommissioning plan differed from FERC's decommissioning proposal in how the sediment behind the dam is treated. FERC's plan was to dredge or bypass the sediment while PacifiCorp's plan used the demolition of the dam to quickly flush as much sediment as possible, thereby minimizing the amount of time the sediment plume harmed downstream aquatic life.

Breaching the dam involved cutting a 12 x 18 x 100-foot (30 m) tunnel in its base; the final 15 feet (4.6 m) was drilled and blasted. A dredge removed woody sediment from the dam's inside face, and when breached, the reservoir was expected to drain within six hours, but actually drained much faster, in only about 30 minutes. The rest of the dam was cut into blocks and removed for disposal or recycling on-site. As of the date of demolition, Condit dam was the largest dam ever removed for environmental reasons and the largest dam ever removed in the United States. [14]

The quick drainage of the reservoir flushed a large amount of sediment quickly, helping to create a new river channel above the dam. The remaining sediment will continue to erode until vegetation takes root. The sediment plume will harm the aquatic ecosystem temporarily; in the case of bull trout, it will be a negative influence for two years, after which it will be a positive influence due to improved ecosystem nutrition. [10] Also, a new sand bar is expected to form at the mouth of the White Salmon River, interfering with Native American fishing rights, for which PacifiCorp will pay a settlement.

Controversy

Opposition to the dam removal came from Klickitat and Skamania County governments. Objections revolved around the loss of lake-front property and water recreation, loss of wetlands and water habitat, and a perception that PacifiCorp was choosing the cheapest way to abandon the project, rather than paying for FERC's preferred solution (a fish passage system), which some believed was the best solution for all parties. [15]

The Klickitat Public Utility District Board of Commissioners investigated acquiring the project from Pacificorp to continue its operation as a power plant. A 2002 study commissioned from CH2M Hill calculated that purchasing and upgrading as required by FERC would have led to power production at $64 per MWh, and that for the project to be economically viable, it would have to have produced power at $45 to $50 per MWh. The report further stated that power produced at Condit would have been more expensive than a gas-fired plant for more than 20 years after its acquisition. [16]

In July 2006, KPUD and Skamania County announced a new effort to acquire the project from PacifiCorp and preserve the dam. Their plan relied on trucking spawning salmon around the dam as a less expensive alternative to fish ladders. This type of proposal was previously rejected by FERC. [17]

The sediment plume was expected to kill some aquatic life below the dam and displace fish as far downstream as Bonneville dam. It could also harm several generations of a threatened chum salmon population. [18]

Most environmental groups involved with the decommissioning plan, as well as the National Forest Service, believed that the long-term benefits of removing the dam far outweighed the short-term damage done by flushed sedimentation. [10] Some fish and environmental advocates see this case as an important precedent for dam removals to restore free-flowing rivers. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Link River Dam</span> Dam in Klamath Falls, U.S.

The Link River Dam is a concrete gravity dam on the Link River in the city of Klamath Falls, Oregon, United States. It was built in 1921 by the California Oregon Power Company (COPCO), the predecessor of PacifiCorp, which continues to operate the dam. The dam is owned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bull Run Hydroelectric Project</span> Dam in Oregon

The Bull Run Hydroelectric Project was a Portland General Electric (PGE) development in the Sandy River basin in the U.S. state of Oregon. Originally built between 1908 and 1912 near the town of Bull Run, it supplied hydroelectric power for the Portland area for nearly a century, until it was removed in 2007 and 2008. The project used a system of canals, tunnels, wood box flumes and diversion dams to feed a remote storage reservoir and powerhouse. The entire project was removed because of rising environmental costs. Marmot Dam on the Sandy River was demolished in 2007, and the Little Sandy Dam on the Little Sandy River was taken down in 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conowingo Dam</span> Dam in Cecil and Harford counties, Maryland

The Conowingo Dam is a large hydroelectric dam in the lower Susquehanna River near the town of Conowingo, Maryland. The medium-height, masonry gravity dam is one of the largest non-federal hydroelectric dams in the U.S., and the largest dam in the state of Maryland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">White Salmon River</span> American river in the state of Washington

The White Salmon River is a 44-mile (71 km) tributary of the Columbia River in the U.S. state of Washington. Originating on the slopes of Mount Adams, it flows into the Columbia Gorge near the community of Underwood. Parts of the river have been designated Wild and Scenic. The principal tributaries of the White Salmon River include Trout Lake and Buck, Mill, Dry, Gilmer, and Rattlesnake Creeks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elwha Dam</span> Dam in Washington, USA

The Elwha Dam was a 108-ft high dam located in the United States, in the state of Washington, on the Elwha River approximately 4.9 miles (7.9 km) upstream from the mouth of the river on the Strait of Juan de Fuca.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glines Canyon Dam</span> Dam on the Elwha River, Washington, US

Glines Canyon Dam, also known as Upper Elwha Dam, was a 210-foot (64 m) tall concrete arch dam that impounded Lake Mills reservoir on the Elwha River in Clallam County, Washington. As of 2015, it is the tallest dam ever to be intentionally breached.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dam removal</span> Process of demolishing a dam

Dam removal is the process of demolishing a dam, returning water flow to the river. Arguments for dam removal consider whether their negative effects outweigh their benefits. The benefits of dams include hydropower production, flood control, irrigation, and navigation. Negative effects of dams include environmental degradation, such as reduced primary productivity, loss of biodiversity, and declines in native species; some negative effects worsen as dams age, like structural weakness, reduced safety, sediment accumulation, and high maintenance expense. The rate of dam removals in the United States has increased over time, in part driven by dam age. As of 1996, 5,000 large dams around the world were more than 50 years old. In 2020, 85% percent of dams in the United States are more than 50 years old. In the United States roughly 900 dams were removed between 1990 and 2015, and by 2015, the rate was 50 to 60 per year. France and Canada have also completed significant removal projects. Japan's first removal, of the Arase Dam on the Kuma River, began in 2012 and was completed in 2017. A number of major dam removal projects have been motivated by environmental goals, particularly restoration of river habitat, native fish, and unique geomorphological features. For example, fish restoration motivated the Elwha Ecosystem Restoration and the dam removal on the river Allier, while recovery of both native fish and of travertine deposition motivated the restoration of Fossil Creek.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Restoration of the Elwha River</span> Dam removal and ecosystem restoration project in Washington, United States

The Elwha Ecosystem Restoration Project is a 21st-century project of the U.S. National Park Service to remove two dams on the Elwha River on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington state, and restore the river to a natural state. It is the largest dam removal project in history and the second largest ecosystem restoration project in the history of the National Park Service, after the Restoration of the Everglades. The controversial project, costing about $351.4 million, has been contested and periodically blocked for decades. It has been supported by a major collaboration among the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, and federal and state agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yale Dam</span> Dam in Washington, USA

Yale Dam is a 323-foot high earth-type hydroelectric dam on the Lewis River, in the U.S. state of Washington, owned by PacifiCorp. It is located on the border between Cowlitz County and Clark County. Its reservoir is called Yale Lake. The dam's power plant capacity is 134 megawatts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John C. Boyle Dam</span> Dam in Oregon, U.S.

The John C. Boyle Dam was a hydroelectric dam located in southern Oregon, United States. It was on the upper Klamath River, south (downstream) of Keno, and about 12 miles (19 km) north of the California border. Originally developed and known as Big Bend, the John C. Boyle dam and powerhouse complex was re-dedicated to honor the pioneer hydroelectric engineer who was responsible for the design of virtually all of the Klamath Hydroelectric Project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydropower policy of the United States</span>

Hydropower policy in the United States includes all the laws, rules, regulations, programs and agencies that govern the national hydroelectric industry. Federal policy concerning waterpower developed over considerable time before the advent of electricity, and at times, has changed considerably, as water uses, available scientific technologies and considerations developed to the present day; over this period the priority of different, pre-existing and competing uses for water, flowing water and its energy, as well as for the water itself and competing available sources of energy have changed. Increased population and commercial demands spurred this developmental growth and many of the changes since, and these affect the technology's use today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iron Gate Dam (California)</span> Dam in Siskiyou County, California

Iron Gate Dam was an earthfill hydroelectric dam on the Klamath River in northern California, outside Hornbrook, California, that opened in 1964. The dam blocked the Klamath River to create the Iron Gate Lake Reservoir. It was the lowermost of a series of power dams on the river, the Klamath River Hydroelectric Project, operated by PacifiCorp. It also posed the first barrier to migrating salmon in the Klamath. The Iron Gate Fish Hatchery was placed just after the dam, hatching salmon and steelhead that were released back into the river.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copco Lake</span> Reservoir in Siskiyou County, California

Copco Lake was an artificial lake on the Klamath River in Siskiyou County, California, near the Oregon border. The lake's waters were impounded by the Copco Number 1 Dam, which was completed in 1922 as part of the Klamath River Hydroelectric Project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John C. Boyle Reservoir</span> Artificial impoundment in the U.S. state of Oregon

John C. Boyle Reservoir was an artificial impoundment behind John C. Boyle Dam on the Klamath River in the U.S. state of Oregon. The lake was 16 miles (26 km) west-southwest of Klamath Falls along Oregon Route 66.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Potter Valley Project</span>

The Potter Valley Project is an interbasin water transfer project in Northern California in the United States, delivering water from the Eel River basin to turbines in the headwaters of the Russian River. The project is owned and operated by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). The main facilities are two dams on the Eel River, a diversion tunnel and hydroelectric plant. Average annual throughput is 159,000 acre⋅ft (196,000,000 m3), although this figure varies significantly with both the amount of precipitation in the Eel River basin and the demand on the Russian River.

The Klamath River Hydroelectric Project was a series of hydroelectric dams and other facilities on the mainstem of the Klamath River, in a watershed on both sides of the California-Oregon border.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Un-Dam the Klamath</span> American social movement

Un-Dam the Klamath (#UnDamtheKlamath) is a social movement in the United States to remove the dams on the Klamath River primarily because they obstruct salmon, steelhead, and other species of fish from accessing the upper basin which provides hundreds of miles of spawning habitat. The dams have also significantly harmed Native American communities such as the Hupa, Karuk, Klamath, and Yurok. Four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon are being advocated for removal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Umpqua Hydroelectric Project</span> Hydroelectric project in Douglas County, Oregon, U.S.

The North Umpqua Hydroelectric Project is a series of hydroelectric power generation facilities along the North Umpqua River in Douglas County, Oregon, United States. The project is owned and operated by PacifiCorp.

References

  1. ↑ Hole blasted in Condit Dam to restore endangered fish habitat, citing AP and KGW. Retrieved from MSNBC website 26 October 2011.
  2. ↑ Hanley, Michael. "IWW Yearbook 1912". IWW History Project. University of Washington. Archived from the original on 2 June 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
  3. ↑ "Construction Strike at White Salmon, Wash". Industrial Worker . Vol. 4, no. 13. 20 June 1912. p. 1.
  4. ↑ "I.W.W. Must Win at White Salmon". Industrial Worker . Vol. 4, no. 14. 27 June 1912. p. 1.
  5. ↑ PacifiCorp, Condit Hydro Project, An overview of the Condit Hydroelectric project and its proposed decommissioning 300 kB pdf
  6. ↑ https://www.opb.org/article/2021/10/16/with-condit-dam-removed-10-years-ago-hopes-have-flowed-with-the-restoration-of-the-white-salmon-river/
  7. ↑ PacifiCorp, Condit Settlement Agreement, Explanatory Statement (1999), 0.7 MB pdf
  8. ↑ Durbin, Kathie (27 December 2005), "PacifiCorp appeals old ruling on dam" Archived 2006-09-04 at the Wayback Machine , The Columbian, Vancouver, WA.
  9. ↑ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (June 2002), Supplemental, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Condit Hydroelectric Project, Washington, FERC Project No. 2342, 10 MB Pdf
  10. 1 2 3 Berg, Ken S. (6 September 2002), "Endangered Species Act Consultation Condit Hydroelectric Project, (P-2342)", U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  11. ↑ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (October 1996), Final Environmental Impact Statement, Condit Hydroelectric Project, Skamania and Klickitat Counties, Washington, 60 MB Pdf
  12. ↑ PacifiCorp, Condit Hydroelectric Project, The Relicensing Process and Decommissioning.
  13. ↑ PacifiCorp(25 February 2005), Memorandum of Agreement Modifying the Condit Hydroelectric Project Settlement Agreement, Includes current list of parties to the negotiations, 1.3 MB Pdf
  14. ↑ "Condit Dam's life extended 2 years" Archived 2006-09-04 at the Wayback Machine (12 February 2005).The Columbian, Vancouver, WA.
  15. ↑ White Salmon Conservation League, Environmental Jewel to be Sacrificed to 'Dam Removal God' Archived 2007-02-05 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ↑ Burkhardt, Jesse (4 December 2002), "Engineer's report shows Condit Dam not viable power resource for PUD" Archived 2006-09-27 at the Wayback Machine , The Enterprise, White Salmon, WA
  17. ↑ Durbine, Kathy (20 July 2006). "Klickitat PUD seeks to buy Condit Dam" Archived 2007-03-18 at the Wayback Machine .The Columbian
  18. 1 2 Durbine, Kathy (22 October 2005). "PacifiCorp appeals old ruling on dam" Archived 2006-09-04 at the Wayback Machine .The Columbian

45°46′02″N121°32′16″W / 45.76722°N 121.53778°W / 45.76722; -121.53778

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.