Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies

Last updated
Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies, for the Purpose of Raising a Revenue, by Act of Parliament
Considerations on the propriety of imposing taxes in the British colonies.png
Title page of a London reprint of the pamphlet
Author Daniel Dulany the Younger
CountryBritish Empire
LanguageEnglish
Published1765

Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies was a pamphlet written by Daniel Dulany the Younger in opposition to the Stamp Act of 1765. [1] In the pamphlet, published in Annapolis in 1765, Dulany argued that the colonies could not be taxed by Parliament, as they were not represented in it. The pamphlet sold widely and was influential in the development of colonial opinion in the early stages of the American Revolution.

Contents

Background

In the aftermath of the British victory over France in the Seven Years' War, in 1763, the British government decided to permanently station troops in North America and the Caribbean. The British government looked to its American colonies to help finance the upkeep of these soldiers. [2] The Stamp Act of 1765 required various printed materials in the colonies to use stamped paper produced in London, and was effectively a tax on the colonies. [3]

The direct imposition of a tax on the colonies by Parliament was controversial, due to the common English belief that the people could only be taxed by their own representatives. British Prime Minister George Grenville acknowledged this principle, but argued that the colonies were virtually represented in the British Parliament. [4] Grenville argued that while the great majority of people in Great Britain—and entire towns such as Birmingham and Leeds—could not vote in Parliamentary elections, the members of Parliament were representatives of the entire nation, rather than of their particular constituencies. [4]

Dulany's Pamphlet

Daniel Dulany the Younger Daniel Dulaney the Younger.jpg
Daniel Dulany the Younger

Daniel Dulany, a Maryland politician and lawyer trained in the Middle Temple in London, was unsettled by the argument that the colonists were virtually represented in Parliament. In 1765, he published his Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies in Annapolis. In this pamphlet, Dulany accepted that inhabitants of England who could not vote were virtually represented by members of Parliament elected by others in England, who would presumably have similar interests. [4] However, Dulany argued that this principle could not extend across the Atlantic Ocean, as the interests of the colonists were too far removed from those of the inhabitants of England. [4] In England, Dulany wrote, the common interest of "the nonelectors, the electors, and the representatives, are individually the same, to say nothing of the connection among the neighbors, friends, and relations. The security of the nonelectors against oppression is that their oppression will fall upon the electors and the representatives. The one can't be injured and the other indemnified." [5] :167 Yet lacking this "intimate and inseparable relation" with electors in Great Britain, the colonists' interests were not protected in this manner, Dulany wrote. [5] :167

Dulany further argued that members of Parliament, though formally free to act according to their conscience, nevertheless faced pressure to follow the wishes of their constituents or else lose their mandates. As the colonists had no direct representatives, they could not exert this form of electoral pressure. [4] Dulany thus rejected the idea that the colonists were virtually represented in Parliament. [4] Dulany was not alone in rejecting the idea that the colonists were virtually represented. Many of his contemporaries, including British Parliamentarian Thomas Whately and Massachusetts politician James Otis, Jr., similarly criticized the concept and its application to the colonies. [5] :166–170

Dulany's pamphlet also set out to define the proper limits of Parliamentary power. In legalistic terms, he distinguished between legislation and taxation. In the former, Dulany viewed Parliament as supreme throughout the British Empire. However, following the principle that taxes are a free gift of the people, enacted through their representatives, Dulany held that Parliament only possessed the right to tax the people of England, Wales and Scotland. [4] Parliament thus had the right to regulate trade in its colonies, and might even collect "incidental Revenue" in doing so, but could not pass laws "for the single purpose of revenue". [4] [5] :212 This distinction between regulation and revenue-raising anticipated John Dickinson's legal argument in his influential Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania , published from 1767 to 1768. [1]

Though the pamphlet at times took on an angry tone, it proposed moderate measures to pressure Parliament into rescinding the Stamp Act. [4] Dulany encouraged his fellow colonists to reduce purchases of British manufactures and instead to turn to local products, which he believed would cause British merchants to lobby Parliament for repeal of the Act. [4]

Dulany's pamphlet achieved a circulation that few colonial pamphlets had ever reached before. [4] In the judgment of historians Edmund and Helen Morgan, "Its articulation and justification of [his countrymen's] own instinctive view of colonial rights delighted them." [4]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stamp Act 1765</span> 1765 British statute which taxed its American colonies use of printed materials

The Stamp Act 1765, also known as the Duties in American Colonies Act 1765, was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain which imposed a direct tax on the British colonies in America and required that many printed materials in the colonies be produced on stamped paper from London which included an embossed revenue stamp. Printed materials included legal documents, magazines, playing cards, newspapers, and many other types of paper used throughout the colonies, and it had to be paid in British currency, not in colonial paper money.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of Burgesses</span> Representative assembly in colonial Virginia

The House of Burgesses was the elected representative element of the Virginia General Assembly, the legislative body of the Colony of Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intolerable Acts</span> Series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774

The Intolerable Acts, sometimes referred to as the Insufferable Acts or Coercive Acts, were a series of five punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws aimed to punish Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest of the Tea Act, a tax measure enacted by Parliament in May 1773. In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts. They were a key development leading to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War in April 1775.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Declaratory Act</span> British legislation regarding the American colonies

The American Colonies Act 1766, commonly known as the Declaratory Act, was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain which accompanied the repeal of the Stamp Act 1765 and the amendment of the Sugar Act. Parliament repealed the Stamp Act because boycotts were hurting British trade and used the declaration to justify the repeal and avoid humiliation. The declaration stated that the Parliament's authority was the same in America as in Britain and asserted Parliament's authority to pass laws that were binding on the American colonies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colonial government in the Thirteen Colonies</span> Organization and structure of the British Colonial administration in the later US East Coast

The governments of the Thirteen Colonies of British America developed in the 17th and 18th centuries under the influence of the British constitution. After the Thirteen Colonies had become the United States, the experience under colonial rule would inform and shape the new state constitutions and, ultimately, the United States Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Townshend Acts</span> Political precursor to the American Revolution

The Townshend Acts or Townshend Duties were a series of British acts of Parliament passed during 1767 and 1768 introducing a series of taxes and regulations to fund administration of the British colonies in America. They are named after the Chancellor of the Exchequer who proposed the programme. Historians vary slightly as to which acts they include under the heading "Townshend Acts", but five are often listed:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stamp Act Congress</span> American colonial meeting against the British Stamp Act

The Stamp Act Congress, also known as the Continental Congress of 1765, was a meeting held in New York City in the colonial Province of New York. It included representatives from some of the British colonies in North America. It was the second gathering of elected representatives from British American colonies after the Albany Convention of 1754. The Congress sought to devise a unified protest against new British taxes by the British Parliament, which passed the Stamp Act, requiring the use of specialty stamped British paper for legal documents, playing cards, calendars, newspapers, and dice for virtually all business in the colonies starting on November 1, 1765.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sugar Act</span> British legislation imposing import duties on American colonies

The Sugar Act 1764 or Sugar Act 1763, also known as the American Revenue Act 1764 or the American Duties Act, was a revenue-raising act passed by the Parliament of Great Britain on 5 April 1764. The preamble to the act stated: "it is expedient that new provisions and regulations should be established for improving the revenue of this Kingdom ... and ... it is just and necessary that a revenue should be raised ... for defraying the expenses of defending, protecting, and securing the same." The earlier Molasses Act 1733, which had imposed a tax of six pence per gallon of molasses, had never been effectively collected due to colonial evasion. By reducing the rate by half and increasing measures to enforce the tax, Parliament hoped that the tax would actually be collected. These incidents increased the colonists' concerns about the intent of the British Parliament and helped the growing movement that became the American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">No taxation without representation</span> Political movement originating in the American Revolution

"No taxation without representation" is a political slogan that originated in the American Revolution and which expressed one of the primary grievances of the American colonists for Great Britain. In short, many colonists believed that as they were not represented in the distant British parliament, any taxes it imposed on the colonists were unconstitutional and were a denial of the colonists' rights as Englishmen.

A stamp act is any legislation that requires a tax to be paid on the transfer of certain documents. Those who pay the tax receive an official stamp on their documents, making them legal documents. A variety of products have been covered by stamp acts including playing cards, dice, patent medicines, cheques, mortgages, contracts, marriage licenses and newspapers. The items may have to be physically stamped at approved government offices following payment of the duty, although methods involving annual payment of a fixed sum or purchase of adhesive stamps are more practical and common.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts Circular Letter</span> Rodolfo. cabrer

The Massachusetts Circular Letter was a statement written by Samuel Adams and James Otis Jr., and passed by the Massachusetts House of Representatives in February 1768 in response to the Townshend Acts. Reactions to the letter brought heightened tensions between the British Parliament and Massachusetts, and resulted in the military occupation of Boston by the British Army, which contributed to the coming of the American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virtual representation</span> Concept that UK parliamentarians spoke on behalf of all imperial subjects

Virtual representation was the idea that the members of Parliament, including the Lords and the Crown-in-Parliament, reserved the right to speak for the interests of all British subjects, rather than for the interests of only the district that elected them or for the regions in which they held peerages and spiritual sway. Virtual representation was the British response to the First Continental Congress in the American colonies. The Second Continental Congress asked for representation in Parliament in the Suffolk Resolves, also known as the first Olive Branch Petition. Parliament claimed that their members had the well being of the colonists in mind. The Colonies rejected this premise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virginia Resolves</span> Series of resolutions passed by the Virginia House of Burgesses

The Virginia Resolves were a series of resolutions passed on May 29, 1765, by the Virginia House of Burgesses in response to the Stamp Act of 1765, which had imposed a tax on the British colonies in North America requiring that material be printed on paper made in London which carried an embossed revenue stamp. The act had been passed by the Parliament of Great Britain to help pay off some of its debt from its various wars, including the French and Indian War fought in part to protect the American colonies.

"On American Taxation" was a speech given by Edmund Burke in the British House of Commons on April 19, 1774, advocating the full repeal of the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767. Parliament had previously repealed five of the six duties of this revenue tax on the American colonies, but the tax on tea remained. The speech was given during the debates on the Coercive Acts, when Rose Fuller proposed that the Townshend duty on tea be repealed to decrease resistance to the new acts. Burke's speech was in support of this motion. According to historian Robert Middlekauff, "The speech is memorable for its wit and its brilliant reconstruction of the government's dismal efforts to bring order into colonial affairs without the advantage of a coherent policy."

<i>Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania</i>

Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania is a series of essays written by the Pennsylvania lawyer and legislator John Dickinson (1732–1808) and published under the pseudonym "A Farmer" from 1767 to 1768. The twelve letters were widely read and reprinted throughout the Thirteen Colonies, and were important in uniting the colonists against the Townshend Acts in the run-up to the American Revolution. According to many historians, the impact of the Letters on the colonies was unmatched until the publication of Thomas Paine's Common Sense in 1776. The success of the letters earned Dickinson considerable fame.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Dulany the Younger</span> American politician and lawyer

Daniel Dulany the Younger was a Maryland Loyalist politician, Mayor of Annapolis, and an influential American lawyer in the period immediately before the American Revolution. His pamphlet Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies, which laid out the grievances associated with the taxation without representation argument, it has been described as "the ablest effort of this kind produced in America".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Petition to the King</span> 1774 petition to George III seeking repeal of the Intolerable Acts

The Petition to the King was a petition sent to King George III by the First Continental Congress in 1774, calling for the repeal of the Intolerable Acts. The King's rejection of the Petition, was one of the causes of the later United States Declaration of Independence and American Revolutionary War. The Continental Congress had hoped to resolve conflict without a war.

The Braintree Instructions was a document sent on September 24, 1765 by the town meeting of Braintree, Massachusetts to the town's representative at the Massachusetts General Court, or legislature, which instructed the representative to oppose the Stamp Act, a tax regime which had recently been adopted by the British Parliament in London. The document is significant because, following the Virginia Resolves, it was among the earliest in British America to officially reject the authority of Parliament over the colonies in North America. The instructions were written by John Adams, who would ten years later become a key figure in the American Revolution and ultimately be elected the second President of the United States in 1796.

Zachariah Hood was an Annapolis businessman who in 1765 was given the job of stamp collector for the Province of Maryland, collecting the duty payable under the new Stamp Act. Returning to Maryland from England in August 1765, he was attacked by an angry mob, and was forced to flee to New York for his life, in what may have been the first forcible resistance in America to British taxation in the years preceding the American Revolution. Hood returned to Maryland but, finding himself persona non grata, he left for the West Indies. In 1774 he was appointed comptroller of the Port of Philadelphia, but he fared little better and in May 1775 he was forced again to flee, this time to England, where he was granted a salary by Prime Minister Lord North.

The Petition to His Majesty, The Memorial to the House of Lords and The Remonstrance to the House of Commons, commonly referred to collectively as the 1768 Petition, Memorial and Remonstrance, are a series of imprints that record a protest by the Virginia House of Burgesses in April 1768 that was sent to the British government by then-acting Lieutenant Governor John Blair.

References

  1. 1 2 Morgan, Edmund S. (2012). The Birth of the Republic, 1763-89 (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press. pp. 34–36. ISBN   9780226923437.
  2. Middlekauff, Robert (2007) [1982]. The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (revised ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 60–62, 160–162. ISBN   9780199740925.
  3. Morgan, Edmund S.; Morgan, Helen M. (1995). "Chapter 5: The Stamp Act". The Stamp Act Crisis: Prologue to Revolution. University of North Carolina Press, Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. p. 72. ISBN   0-631-21058-X. JSTOR   10.5149/9780807899793_morgan.7.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Morgan, Edmund S.; Morgan, Helen M. (1995). "Chapter 6: Daniel Dulany, Pamphleteer". The Stamp Act Crisis: Prologue to Revolution. University of North Carolina Press, Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. pp. 75–91. ISBN   0-631-21058-X. JSTOR   10.5149/9780807899793_morgan.8.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Bailyn, Bernard (2017) [1967]. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (3rd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN   978-0-674-97565-1.