Critical anthropomorphism

Last updated

Critical anthropomorphism is an approach in the study of animal behavior that integrates scientific knowledge about a species, including its perceptual world, ecological context, and evolutionary history, to generate hypotheses through the lens of human intuition and understanding. [1] This method contrasts with classical anthropomorphism, which often uncritically attributes human traits and emotions to animals. [2]

Contents

The term was introduced by Gordon Burghardt in the mid-1980s. Burghardt emphasized the importance of using feelings, perceptions, evolutionary knowledge, and careful behavioral descriptions to provide relevant insights into animal behavior. [1] This approach is seen as a practical application of ethology, the scientific study of animal behavior. [1]

Historically, the concept draws on the ideas of Jakob von Uexküll, who introduced the notions of umwelt (the perceptual world of an organism) and innenwelt (the inner world of an organism). These ideas highlight that different species perceive the world uniquely based on their sensory capacities. [1] Early ethologists like Nikolaas Tinbergen, Konrad Lorenz, and Karl von Frisch also considered the role of subjectivity in animal behavior research. [1] [3]

Critical anthropomorphism calls for an account of animal consciousness and cognition that acknowledges sentient creatures as having lived bodily experiences. This perspective allows researchers to generate objectively testable ideas about animal behavior by leveraging human intuition and knowledge of an animal’s natural history.

Historical Roots of Critical Anthropomorphism

The concept of critical anthropomorphism has its roots in the ideas of Jakob von Uexküll, who introduced the notions of umwelt (the perceptual world of an organism) and innenwelt (the inner world of an organism). These ideas emphasize that different species perceive the world uniquely based on their sensory capacities. [1] This perspective laid the groundwork for understanding animal behavior through their own perceptual experiences rather than solely through human observation.

Early ethologists like Nikolaas Tinbergen, Konrad Lorenz, and Karl von Frisch also contributed to the foundation of critical anthropomorphism by considering the role of subjectivity in animal behavior research. [1] They recognized that understanding animal behavior required acknowledging the animals’ perspectives and experiences.

Charles Darwin is another significant figure in the historical development of critical anthropomorphism. In his work, “The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals,” Darwin used everyday language to describe animal mentality, employing a form of critical anthropomorphism by ascribing mental states based on shared recognition and empirical knowledge. [1] This approach highlighted the continuity between human and animal emotions and behaviors, challenging the strict separation between humans and other animals.

The term “critical anthropomorphism” itself was introduced by Gordon Burghardt in the mid-1980s. Burghardt emphasized the importance of using feelings, perceptions, evolutionary knowledge, and careful behavioral descriptions to provide relevant insights into animal behavior. [1] This approach is seen as a practical application of ethology, the scientific study of animal behavior.

Overall, the historical roots of critical anthropomorphism are deeply intertwined with the development of ethology and the recognition of the importance of considering animals’ subjective experiences in understanding their behavior. [4] [5]

Implementation and Examples of Critical Anthropomorphism

Implementation

Critical anthropomorphism involves using a combination of scientific knowledge, natural history, and human intuition to generate hypotheses about animal behavior. This approach is implemented by carefully observing animals and considering their perceptual worlds, ecological contexts, and evolutionary histories. Researchers use their own feelings and perceptions, informed by scientific data, to make educated guesses about what animals might be experiencing or why they behave in certain ways. [1]

Examples

  1. Foraging Tactics in Snakes: Researchers studying snake behavior might use critical anthropomorphism to hypothesize how a snake perceives its environment while hunting. By considering the snake’s sensory capabilities and natural history, scientists can make informed guesses about how the snake detects prey and decides when to strike. [1]
  2. Courtship Behavior in Fruit Flies: In studying the courtship behavior of fruit flies, researchers might use critical anthropomorphism to understand the motivations behind certain actions. By considering the evolutionary pressures and sensory experiences of fruit flies, scientists can hypothesize why certain courtship behaviors have evolved and how they are perceived by the flies. [1]
  3. Conservation Planning for Wildlife Management: Critical anthropomorphism can be applied in conservation efforts to better understand the needs and behaviors of endangered species. For example, when planning a wildlife reserve, conservationists might use critical anthropomorphism to predict how animals will interact with their environment and each other, ensuring that the reserve meets their ecological and social needs. [6]
  4. Zoo Exhibit Design: Zoos can use critical anthropomorphism to design exhibits that cater to the perceptual and behavioral needs of animals. By considering how animals perceive their surroundings and what stimulates their natural behaviors, zoos can create environments that promote the well-being of the animals and provide educational experiences for visitors. [7]

These examples illustrate how critical anthropomorphism can be a valuable tool in understanding and predicting animal behavior, leading to more effective research, conservation, and animal care practices. [7]

Ethical Considerations of Critical Anthropomorphism

Critical anthropomorphism involves using human intuition and scientific knowledge to understand animal behavior, but it also raises important ethical considerations. Here are some key points:

  1. Avoiding Misrepresentation:
    • One of the primary ethical concerns is the potential for misrepresenting animals. Anthropomorphism can lead to projecting human emotions and motivations onto animals inaccurately. However, avoiding anthropomorphism entirely can result in mechanomorphism, where animals are viewed as mere machines. [6]
    • Critical anthropomorphism aims to strike a balance by using informed projections that are scientifically grounded and contextually appropriate. [6]
  2. Enhancing Empathy and Understanding:
    • When used carefully, critical anthropomorphism can enhance empathy towards animals. By considering animals’ perspectives and experiences, researchers and the public can develop a deeper understanding and appreciation of animal welfare. [8]
    • This approach can also improve the ethical treatment of animals in various settings, including research, zoos, and conservation efforts. [8]
  3. Communicative Strategy:
    • Anthropomorphism is an effective communicative strategy in animal ethics. It helps bridge the gap between human and animal experiences, making it easier to convey the importance of animal welfare to a broader audience. [6]
    • By using relatable human terms and emotions, critical anthropomorphism can make scientific findings more accessible and compelling. [6]
  4. Ethical Research Practices:
    • In research settings, critical anthropomorphism encourages scientists to consider the subjective experiences of animals. This can lead to more humane and ethical research practices, ensuring that animals are not merely treated as objects but as sentient beings with their own needs and experiences. [7]
    • It also promotes the development of research methodologies that minimize harm and stress to animals. [7]
  5. Legal and Policy Implications:
    • The ethical considerations of critical anthropomorphism extend to legal and policy frameworks. Recognizing animals as sentient beings with subjective experiences can influence laws and regulations related to animal welfare and rights. [7]
    • This perspective can drive changes in how animals are treated in industries such as agriculture, entertainment, and research. [7]

Overall, critical anthropomorphism, when applied thoughtfully, can lead to more ethical and empathetic interactions with animals. It encourages a nuanced understanding of animal behavior and promotes practices that respect and protect animal welfare. [8]

Contemporary Views on Critical Anthropomorphism

In recent years, critical anthropomorphism has gained traction as a valuable approach in the study of animal behavior and cognition. Here are some contemporary perspectives:

  1. Integration with Evolutionary Theory:
    • Contemporary researchers emphasize the importance of integrating critical anthropomorphism with evolutionary theory. This approach acknowledges that there is no clear evolutionary gap between humans and other animals, which supports the idea that animals can have complex mental states and experiences. [1]
    • By considering evolutionary continuity, scientists can make more informed and accurate attributions of mental phenomena and emotions to animals. [1]
  2. Balancing Objectivity and Subjectivity:
    • Modern ethologists and cognitive scientists recognize the need to balance objectivity with subjectivity. While traditional behaviorism focused solely on observable phenomena, critical anthropomorphism allows for the consideration of animals’ subjective experiences without falling into the trap of naive anthropomorphism. [9]
    • This balanced approach helps researchers generate hypotheses that are both scientifically rigorous and empathetic towards animals. [9]
  3. Ethical and Practical Applications:
    • Critical anthropomorphism is increasingly seen as an ethical and practical tool in various fields, including animal welfare, conservation, and zoo management. By understanding animals’ perspectives, professionals can design better environments and interventions that cater to the animals’ needs. [10]
    • This approach also promotes more humane treatment of animals in research and other settings, as it encourages scientists to consider the animals’ well-being and subjective experiences. [10]
  4. Challenges and Criticisms:
    • Despite its growing acceptance, critical anthropomorphism faces challenges and criticisms. Some scholars argue that it still risks anthropocentrism and may lead to over-interpretation of animal behavior. [9]
    • Others believe that while it is a useful heuristic, it should be applied cautiously and always backed by empirical evidence to avoid misrepresentation. [9]
  5. Future Directions:
    • The future of critical anthropomorphism lies in its continued refinement and integration with other scientific approaches. Researchers are exploring ways to combine it with advanced technologies, such as neuroimaging and machine learning, to gain deeper insights into animal cognition and behavior. [1]
    • There is also a growing interest in interdisciplinary collaborations, bringing together ethologists, psychologists, philosophers, and other experts to develop a more comprehensive understanding of animal minds. [1]

Overall, contemporary views on critical anthropomorphism highlight its potential to enhance our understanding of animals while promoting ethical and empathetic research practices. [3]

Key Figures and Works in Critical Anthropomorphism

1. Gordon Burghardt:

2. Jakob von Uexküll:

3. Charles Darwin:

4. Edward Chace Tolman:

5. Contemporary Researchers:

These key figures and their works have significantly shaped the field of critical anthropomorphism, providing valuable insights into the subjective experiences and cognitive abilities of animals.

Practical Applications of Critical Anthropomorphism

1. Animal Behavior Research:

2. Conservation Efforts:

3. Zoo and Aquarium Exhibit Design:

4. Animal Welfare and Ethics:

5. Education and Public Awareness:

These practical applications demonstrate how critical anthropomorphism can enhance our understanding of animals and improve their treatment across various domains. [6] [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethology</span> Scientific objective study of non-human animal behaviour

Ethology is a branch of zoology that studies the behaviour of non-human animals. It has its scientific roots in the work of Charles Darwin and of American and German ornithologists of the late 19th and early 20th century, including Charles O. Whitman, Oskar Heinroth, and Wallace Craig. The modern discipline of ethology is generally considered to have begun during the 1930s with the work of the Dutch biologist Nikolaas Tinbergen and the Austrian biologists Konrad Lorenz and Karl von Frisch, the three winners of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Ethology combines laboratory and field science, with a strong relation to neuroanatomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emotion</span> Conscious subjective experience of humans

Emotions are physical and mental states brought on by neurophysiological changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure. There is no scientific consensus on a definition. Emotions are often intertwined with mood, temperament, personality, disposition, or creativity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Konrad Lorenz</span> Austrian zoologist (1903–1989)

Konrad Zacharias Lorenz was an Austrian zoologist, ethologist, and ornithologist. He shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Nikolaas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch. He is often regarded as one of the founders of modern ethology, the study of animal behavior. He developed an approach that began with an earlier generation, including his teacher Oskar Heinroth.

Zoology is the scientific study of animals. Its studies include the structure, embryology, classification, habits, and distribution of all animals, both living and extinct, and how they interact with their ecosystems. Zoology is one of the primary branches of biology. The term is derived from Ancient Greek ζῷον, zōion ('animal'), and λόγος, logos.

Morgan's Canon, also known as Lloyd Morgan's Canon, Morgan's Canon of Interpretation or the principle or law of parsimony, is a fundamental precept of comparative (animal) psychology, coined by 19th-century British psychologist C. Lloyd Morgan. In its developed form it states that:

In no case is an animal activity to be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes if it can be fairly interpreted in terms of processes which stand lower in the scale of psychological evolution and development.

Comparative psychology is the scientific study of the behavior and mental processes of non-human animals, especially as these relate to the phylogenetic history, adaptive significance, and development of behavior. The phrase comparative psychology may be employed in a narrow and a broad meaning. In its narrow meaning, it refers to the study of the similarities and differences in the psychology and behavior of different species. In a broader meaning, comparative psychology includes comparisons between different biological and socio-cultural groups, such as species, sexes, developmental stages, ages, and ethnicities. Research in this area addresses many different issues, uses many different methods and explores the behavior of many different species from insects to primates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal cognition</span> Intelligence of non-human animals

Animal cognition encompasses the mental capacities of non-human animals including insect cognition. The study of animal conditioning and learning used in this field was developed from comparative psychology. It has also been strongly influenced by research in ethology, behavioral ecology, and evolutionary psychology; the alternative name cognitive ethology is sometimes used. Many behaviors associated with the term animal intelligence are also subsumed within animal cognition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jakob Johann von Uexküll</span> Baltic German biologist, zoologist, and philosopher (1864–1944)

Jakob Johann Freiherr von Uexküll was a Baltic German biologist who worked in the fields of muscular physiology and animal behaviour studies and was an influence on the cybernetics of life. However, his most notable contribution is the notion of Umwelt, used by semiotician Thomas Sebeok and philosopher Martin Heidegger. His works established biosemiotics as a field of research.

Cognitive ethology is a branch of ethology concerned with the influence of conscious awareness and intention on the behaviour of an animal. Donald Griffin, a zoology professor in the United States, set up the foundations for researches in the cognitive awareness of animals within their habitats.

Evolutionary ethics is a field of inquiry that explores how evolutionary theory might bear on our understanding of ethics or morality. The range of issues investigated by evolutionary ethics is quite broad. Supporters of evolutionary ethics have argued that it has important implications in the fields of descriptive ethics, normative ethics, and metaethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emotion in animals</span> Research into similarities between non-human and human emotions

Emotion is defined as any mental experience with high intensity and high hedonic content. The existence and nature of emotions in non-human animals are believed to be correlated with those of humans and to have evolved from the same mechanisms. Charles Darwin was one of the first scientists to write about the subject, and his observational approach has since developed into a more robust, hypothesis-driven, scientific approach. Cognitive bias tests and learned helplessness models have shown feelings of optimism and pessimism in a wide range of species, including rats, dogs, cats, rhesus macaques, sheep, chicks, starlings, pigs, and honeybees. Jaak Panksepp played a large role in the study of animal emotion, basing his research on the neurological aspect. Mentioning seven core emotional feelings reflected through a variety of neuro-dynamic limbic emotional action systems, including seeking, fear, rage, lust, care, panic and play. Through brain stimulation and pharmacological challenges, such emotional responses can be effectively monitored.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anecdotal cognitivism</span>

Anecdotal cognitivism is a method of research using anecdotal, and anthropomorphic evidence through the observation of animal behaviour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal consciousness</span> Quality or state of self-awareness within an animal

Animal consciousness, or animal awareness, is the quality or state of self-awareness within an animal, or of being aware of an external object or something within itself. In humans, consciousness has been defined as: sentience, awareness, subjectivity, qualia, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood, and the executive control system of the mind. Despite the difficulty in definition, many philosophers believe there is a broadly shared underlying intuition about what consciousness is.

Some of the research that is conducted in the field of psychology is more "fundamental" than the research conducted in the applied psychological disciplines, and does not necessarily have a direct application. The subdisciplines within psychology that can be thought to reflect a basic-science orientation include biological psychology, cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and so on. Research in these subdisciplines is characterized by methodological rigor. The concern of psychology as a basic science is in understanding the laws and processes that underlie behavior, cognition, and emotion. Psychology as a basic science provides a foundation for applied psychology. Applied psychology, by contrast, involves the application of psychological principles and theories yielded up by the basic psychological sciences; these applications are aimed at overcoming problems or promoting well-being in areas such as mental and physical health and education.

The intrinsic value of a human or any other sentient animal comes from within itself. It is the value it places on its own existence. Intrinsic value exists wherever there are beings that value themselves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marc Bekoff</span> American biologist (born 1945)

Marc Bekoff is an American biologist, ethologist, behavioral ecologist and writer. He is Professor Emeritus of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado Boulder and cofounder of the Jane Goodall Institute of Ethologists for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and cofounder of the Jane Goodall Roots and Shoots program.

Human ethology is the study of human behavior. Ethology as a discipline is generally thought of as a sub-category of biology, though psychological theories have been developed based on ethological ideas. The bridging between biological sciences and social sciences creates an understanding of human ethology. The International Society for Human Ethology is dedicated to advancing the study and understanding of human ethology.

Psychology encompasses a vast domain, and includes many different approaches to the study of mental processes and behavior. Below are the major areas of inquiry that taken together constitute psychology. A comprehensive list of the sub-fields and areas within psychology can be found at the list of psychology topics and list of psychology disciplines.

Trans-species psychology is the field of psychology that states that humans and nonhuman animals share commonalities in cognition (thinking) and emotions (feelings). It was established by Gay A. Bradshaw, American ecologist and psychologist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Balcombe</span> British ethologist

Jonathan Balcombe is an ethologist and author. He is formerly Director of Animal Sentience with the Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy, and Department Chair for Animal Studies with Humane Society University, in Washington, DC. He lectures internationally on animal behavior and the human-animal relationship. He also served as Associate Editor of the journal Animal Sentience from 2015 to 2019.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Humphreys, Rebekah (2023). "Critical Anthropomorphism". Animals, Ethics, and Language. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. pp. 45–64. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-32080-4_4. ISBN   978-3-031-32079-8.
  2. "Classical vs. Critical Anthropomorphism".[ self-published source? ]
  3. 1 2 "Facatativa Colombia January 2019 Stone Reproduction Stock Photo 1603782847".[ unreliable source? ]
  4. 1 2 3 Burghardt, Gordon M (2007). "Critical anthropomorphism, uncritical anthropocentrism, and naïve nominalism". Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews. 2 (1): 136–138. doi:10.3819/ccbr.2008.20009.
  5. Minteer, Ben A.; Manning, Robert E. (2005). "An Appraisal of the Critique of Anthropocentrism and Three Lesser Known Themes in Lynn White's 'the Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis'". Organization & Environment. 18 (2): 163–176. doi:10.1177/1086026605276196. JSTOR   26162006.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Karlsson, Fredrik (October 2012). "Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics". Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 25 (5): 707–720. doi:10.1007/s10806-011-9349-8.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tomlinson 2020, p. [ page needed ].
  8. 1 2 3 Russow, L.-M. (2002). "Ethical Implications of the Human-Animal Bond in the Laboratory". ILAR Journal. 43 (1): 33–37. doi:10.1093/ilar.43.1.33. PMID   11752729.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Wynne, C. D. L. (2007). "What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior". Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews. 2 (1): 125–135. doi:10.3819/CCBR.2008.20008. S2CID   17568051.
  10. 1 2 Bruni, Domenica; Perconti, Pietro; Plebe, Alessio (15 November 2018). "Anti-anthropomorphism and Its Limits". Frontiers in Psychology. 9: 2205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02205 . PMC   6249301 . PMID   30498465.
  11. Williams, Lisa A.; Brosnan, Sarah F.; Clay, Zanna (August 2020). "Anthropomorphism in comparative affective science: Advocating a mindful approach" (PDF). Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 115: 299–307. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.014. PMID   32497569.

Sources

Further reading