Critical systems thinking

Last updated

Critical systems thinking (CST) is a systems approach designed to aid decision-makers, and other stakeholders, improve complex problem situations that cross departmental and, often, organizational boundaries. CST sees systems thinking as essential to managing multidimensional 'messes' in which technical, economic, organizational, human, cultural and political elements interact. It is critical in a positive manner because it seeks to capitalize on the strengths of existing approaches while also calling attention to their limitations. CST seeks to allow systems approaches such as systems engineering, system dynamics, organizational cybernetics, soft systems methodology, critical systems heuristics, and others, to be used together, in a responsive and flexible way, to maximize the benefits they can bring.

Contents

History

CST has its origins in the 1980s with accounts of how the theoretical partiality of existing systems methodologies limited their ability to guide interventions in the full range of problem situations; [1] [2] [3] calls for pluralism in systems practice; [4] [5] and suggestions about how those disadvantaged by systems designs could be given a voice and have impact. [6] [3] CST was largely developed at the Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, based on research by Michael C Jackson, Paul Keys, and Robert L Flood. It came to prominence in 1991 with the publication of three books - Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, [7] Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, [8] and Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. [9] The first was a collection of papers, accompanied by a commentary, which traced the origins and outlined the major themes of the approach. It highlighted the contributions of authors such as Flood, Fuenmayor, Jackson, Mingers, Oliga and Ulrich. The second offered a critique of existing systems approaches from the perspective of social theory, made the case for CST and sought to demonstrate that it could take the lead in enriching theory and practice in the management sciences. The third was the first attempt to show how CST could be used in practice. Since 1991, CST has been taken forward by authors such as Robert L Flood, [10] [11] Michael C Jackson, [12] [13] [14] John Mingers [15] and Gerald Midgley. [16]

Recent developments

Recent developments have centered on the application of CST in practice - in particular Gerald Midgley's 'Systemic Intervention', [16] focusing on boundary critique, and Michael C Jackson's multiperspectival and multimethodological 'Critical Systems Practice' (CSP). [14] Adopting a pragmatist orientation, [17] Jackson has set out, in a series of papers, how the four commitments of CST can be applied in practice. [18] [19] [20] [21] CSP has 4 main stages - Explore, Produce, Intervene, and Check (EPIC) - and various sub-stages:

See also

Related Research Articles

Systems theory is the transdisciplinary study of systems, i.e. cohesive groups of interrelated, interdependent components that can be natural or human-made. Every system has causal boundaries, is influenced by its context, defined by its structure, function and role, and expressed through its relations with other systems. A system is "more than the sum of its parts" by expressing synergy or emergent behavior.

Within personality psychology, personal construct theory (PCT) or personal construct psychology (PCP) is a theory of personality and cognition developed by the American psychologist George Kelly in the 1950s. The theory addresses the psychological reasons for actions. Kelly proposed that individuals can be psychologically evaluated according to similarity–dissimilarity poles, which he called personal constructs. The theory is considered by some psychologists as forerunner to theories of cognitive therapy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Systems science</span> Study of the nature of systems

Systems science, also referred to as systems research, or, simply, systems, is a transdisciplinary field concerned with understanding systems—from simple to complex—in nature, society, cognition, engineering, technology and science itself. The field is diverse, spanning the formal, natural, social, and applied sciences.

Soft systems methodology (SSM) is an organised way of thinking that's applicable to problematic social situations and in the management of change by using action. It was developed in England by academics at the Lancaster Systems Department on the basis of a ten-year action research programme.

In planning and policy, a wicked problem is a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. It refers to an idea or problem that cannot be fixed, where there is no single solution to the problem; and "wicked" denotes resistance to resolution, rather than evil. Another definition is "a problem whose social complexity means that it has no determinable stopping point". Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. Due to their complexity, wicked problems are often characterized by organized irresponsibility.

Reflective practice is the ability to reflect on one's actions so as to take a critical stance or attitude towards one's own practice and that of one's peers, engaging in a process of continuous adaptation and learning. According to one definition it involves "paying critical attention to the practical values and theories which inform everyday actions, by examining practice reflectively and reflexively. This leads to developmental insight". A key rationale for reflective practice is that experience alone does not necessarily lead to learning; deliberate reflection on experience is essential.

Hard systems is a problem-solving approach in systems science. It is opposing soft systems. Although soft systems thinking treats all problems as ill-defined or not easily quantified, hard systems approaches assume that the problems associated with such systems are well-defined, they have a single, optimum solution, a scientific approach to problem-solving will work well, and that technical factors will tend to predominate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Management cybernetics</span> Application of cybernetics to management and organizations

Management cybernetics is concerned with the application of cybernetics to management and organizations. "Management cybernetics" was first introduced by Stafford Beer in the late 1950s and introduces the various mechanisms of self-regulation applied by and to organizational settings, as seen through a cybernetics perspective. Beer developed the theory through a combination of practical applications and a series of influential books. The practical applications involved steel production, publishing and operations research in a large variety of different industries. Some consider that the full flowering of management cybernetics is represented in Beer's books. However, learning continues.

Michael Christopher Jackson OBE is a British systems scientist, consultant and Emeritus Professor of Management Systems and former Dean of Hull University Business School, known for his work in the field of systems thinking and management.

Robert Louis (Bob) Flood is a British organizational scientist, former Professor of Management Sciences at the University of Hull, specialized in applied systemic thinking, particularly in the areas of strategic management, organizational behavior and organizational improvement.

Werner Ulrich is a Swiss social scientist and practical philosopher, and a former professor of the theory and practice of social planning at the University of Fribourg. He is known as one of the originators of critical systems thinking (CST) and in particular for the development of critical systems heuristics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cybernetics</span> Transdisciplinary field concerned with regulatory and purposive systems

Cybernetics is a wide-ranging field concerned with circular causal processes such as feedback. Norbert Wiener named the field after an example of circular causal feedback—that of steering a ship where the helmsman adjusts their steering in response to the effect it is observed as having, enabling a steady course to be maintained amongst disturbances such as cross-winds or the tide.

DSRP is a theory and method of thinking, developed by systems theorist and cognitive scientist Derek Cabrera. It is an acronym that stands for Distinctions, Systems, Relationships, and Perspectives. Cabrera posits that these four patterns underlie all cognition, that they are universal to the process of structuring information, and that people can improve their thinking skills by learning to use the four elements explicitly.

Gerald Robert Midgley is a British organizational theorist, professor of systems thinking, director of the Centre for Systems Studies at the University of Hull, and past president (2013-2014) of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. He is known for his work on "Systemic Intervention;" which he defined as "purposeful action by an agent to create change in relation to reflection upon boundaries."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Critical realism (philosophy of the social sciences)</span>

Critical realism is a philosophical approach to understanding science, and in particular social science, initially developed by Roy Bhaskar (1944–2014). It specifically opposes forms of empiricism and positivism by viewing science as concerned with identifying causal mechanisms. In the last decades of the twentieth century it also stood against various forms of postmodernism and poststructuralism by insisting on the reality of objective existence. In contrast to positivism's methodological foundation, and poststructuralism's epistemological foundation, critical realism insists that (social) science should be built from an explicit ontology. Critical realism is one of a range of types of philosophical realism, as well as forms of realism advocated within social science such as analytic realism and subtle realism.

Metacognitive therapy (MCT) is a psychotherapy focused on modifying metacognitive beliefs that perpetuate states of worry, rumination and attention fixation. It was created by Adrian Wells based on an information processing model by Wells and Gerald Matthews. It is supported by scientific evidence from a large number of studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Problem structuring methods</span>

Problem structuring methods (PSMs) are a group of techniques used to model or to map the nature or structure of a situation or state of affairs that some people want to change. PSMs are usually used by a group of people in collaboration to create a consensus about, or at least to facilitate negotiations about, what needs to change. Some widely adopted PSMs include soft systems methodology, the strategic choice approach, and strategic options development and analysis (SODA).

The Integrated Management Concept, or IMC is an approach to structure management challenges by applying a "system-theoretical perspective that sees organisations as complex systems consisting of sub-systems, interrelations, and functions". The most characteristic aspect of the IMC is its distinction between three particular management dimensions: normative, strategic, and operational management, which are held together by different integration mechanisms. The normative management dimension determines the general aim of the organization, the strategic dimension directs the plans, basic structures, systems, and the problem-solving behaviour of the staff for achieving it, and the operative level translates the normative missions and strategic programs into day-to-day organizational processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Systemic intervention</span>

Systemic intervention is a deliberate operation by intervening agents that seeks people to make alterations in their lives in psychology. This analyses how people deal with challenges in the contemporary era, including their power relations and how they reform relationship with others. Midgley ventured new approach to systems philosophy and social theory that could develop variety usage of the multiple strands of systemic thinking to systemic intervention. Scientific methods could be used as a segment of the intervention practice. However, it does not deal with all of the problems of systemic thinking as well as the science complexity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Applied epistemology</span> Application of epistemology in specific fields

Applied epistemology refers to the study that determines whether the systems of investigation that seek the truth lead to true beliefs about the world. A specific conceptualization cites that it attempts to reveal whether these systems contribute to epistemic aims. It is applied in practices outside of philosophy like science and mathematics.

References

  1. Jackson, Michael C (1982). "The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland". Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 9: 17–28.
  2. Mingers, J (1980). "Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology". Journal of Applied Systems Analysis. 7: 41–49.
  3. 1 2 Jackson, Michael C (1985). "Social systems theory and practice: the need for a critical approach". International Journal of General Systems. 10: 135–151. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-7351-9. ISBN   978-1-4471-7350-2. S2CID   26158105.
  4. Jackson, Michael C; Keys, P (1984). "Towards a system of systems methodologies". Journal of the Operational Research Society. 35 (6): 473–486. doi:10.1057/jors.1984.101. S2CID   62772311.
  5. Jackson, MC (1987-01-01). "Present positions and future prospects in management science". Omega. 15 (6): 455–466. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(87)90003-X. ISSN   0305-0483.
  6. Ulrich, W (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning. Bern: Haupt.
  7. Flood, R L; Jackson, Michael C, eds. (1991). Critical systems thinking: directed readings. Chichester: Wiley.
  8. Jackson, Michael C (1991). Systems methodology for the management sciences. New York: Plenum.
  9. Flood, R L; Jackson, Michael C (1991). Creative problem solving: total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.
  10. Flood, R L (1995). Solving problem solving. Chichester: Wiley.
  11. Flood, R L (1999). Rethinking the fifth discipline. London: Routledge.
  12. Jackson, Michael C (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  13. Jackson, Michael C (2003). Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. Chichester: Wiley.
  14. 1 2 Jackson, Michael C (2019). Critical systems thinking and the management of complexity. Chichester: Wiley.
  15. Mingers, John (2014). Systems Thinking, Critical Realism and Philosophy: A Confluence of Ideas. doi:10.4324/9781315774503. ISBN   9781317684626.
  16. 1 2 Systemic Intervention. Contemporary Systems Thinking. 2000. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4201-8. ISBN   978-1-4613-6885-4.
  17. Jackson, Michael C. (2022-10-04). "Rebooting the systems approach by applying the thinking of Bogdanov and the pragmatists". Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 40 (2): 349–365. doi:10.1002/sres.2908. ISSN   1092-7026. S2CID   252747377.
  18. Jackson, Michael C (2020). "CSP 1: Explore - starting a multimethodological intervention". Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 37: 839–858. doi:10.1002/sres.2746. S2CID   224962260.
  19. Jackson, Michael C. (2021). "Critical systems practice 2: Produce —Constructing a multimethodological intervention strategy". Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 38 (5): 594–609. doi:10.1002/sres.2809. ISSN   1092-7026. S2CID   239701175.
  20. Jackson, Michael C. (2022-09-30). "Critical systems practice 3: Intervene —Flexibly executing a multimethodological intervention". Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 39 (6): 1014–1023. doi:10.1002/sres.2909. ISSN   1092-7026. S2CID   252657680.
  21. Jackson, Michael C. (2022-10-10). "Critical systems practice 4: Check —Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention". Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 40 (4): 617–632. doi:10.1002/sres.2912. ISSN   1092-7026. S2CID   252832336.