Darwin's tubercle

Last updated
Darwin's tubercle
Darwin-s-tubercle.jpg
Left: Darwin's tubercle. Right: the homologous point in a macaque.
Details
Identifiers
Latin tuberculum auriculare
TA98 A15.3.01.020
TA2 194
FMA 61151
Anatomical terminology
Darwin's tubercle (helix) DarwinsTub.jpg
Darwin's tubercle (helix)

Darwin's tubercle (or auricular tubercle) is a congenital ear condition which often presents as a thickening on the helix at the junction of the upper and middle thirds.

Contents

History

Scan of Figure 2, from Darwin's Descent of Man, second edition, illustrating Darwin's tubercle Descent of Man - Burt 1874 - Fig 2.png
Scan of Figure 2, from Darwin's Descent of Man, second edition, illustrating Darwin's tubercle

This atavistic feature is so called because its description was first published by Charles Darwin in the opening pages of The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , as evidence of a vestigial feature indicating common ancestry among primates which have pointy ears. However, Darwin himself named it the Woolnerian tip, after Thomas Woolner, a British sculptor who had depicted it in one of his sculptures and had first theorised that it was an atavistic feature. [1]

Prevalence

The feature is present in approximately 10.4% of the Spanish adult population, 40% of adults in India, and 58% of Swedish school children. [2] [3] [4] [5] This acuminate nodule represents the point of the mammalian ear. The trait can potentially be bilateral, meaning present on both ears, or unilateral, where it is present on only one ear. There is mixed evidence in regard to whether the bilateral or unilateral expression is related to population, or other factors. Some populations express full bilateral, while others may express either unilateral or bilateral. However, bilateral appears to be more common than unilateral as it pertains to the expression of the trait. [3] [6] [7] [8] [9]

Inheritance

The gene for Darwin's tubercle was once thought to be inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with incomplete penetrance, meaning that those who possess the allele (version of a gene) will not necessarily present with the phenotype. [10] However, genetic and family studies have demonstrated that the presence of Darwin's tubercle may be more likely to be influenced by one's environment or developmental accidents than it is by genetics alone. [11] [12] [5] There is no clear argument for whether the trait has significance in sexual dimorphism studies or age related studies. In some studies, there is clear data that Darwin's tubercle is not associated with sex. [7] [6] In contrast, others indicate that there is a correlation with sexual dimorphism between men and women, where men tend to have the tubercle more than women in some populations. [3] Two studies indicate that older men tend to have greater expression of Darwin's tubercle than do older women. [13]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human evolution</span> Evolutionary process leading to anatomically modern humans

Human evolution is the evolutionary process within the history of primates that led to the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of the hominid family that includes all the great apes. This process involved the gradual development of traits such as human bipedalism, dexterity, and complex language, as well as interbreeding with other hominins, indicating that human evolution was not linear but weblike. The study of the origins of humans involves several scientific disciplines, including physical and evolutionary anthropology, paleontology, and genetics; the field is also known by the terms anthropogeny, anthropogenesis, and anthropogony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual dimorphism</span> Evolved difference in sex-specific characteristics

Sexual dimorphism is the condition where sexes of the same species exhibit different morphological characteristics, particularly characteristics not directly involved in reproduction. The condition occurs in most dioecious species, which consist of most animals and some plants. Differences may include secondary sex characteristics, size, weight, color, markings, or behavioral or cognitive traits. Male-male reproductive competition has evolved a diverse array of sexually dimorphic traits. Aggressive utility traits such as "battle" teeth and blunt heads reinforced as battering rams are used as weapons in aggressive interactions between rivals. Passive displays such as ornamental feathering or song-calling have also evolved mainly through sexual selection. These differences may be subtle or exaggerated and may be subjected to sexual selection and natural selection. The opposite of dimorphism is monomorphism, when both biological sexes are phenotypically indistinguishable from each other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vestigiality</span> Evolutionary retention of no longer needed structures in living organisms

Vestigiality is the retention, during the process of evolution, of genetically determined structures or attributes that have lost some or all of the ancestral function in a given species. Assessment of the vestigiality must generally rely on comparison with homologous features in related species. The emergence of vestigiality occurs by normal evolutionary processes, typically by loss of function of a feature that is no longer subject to positive selection pressures when it loses its value in a changing environment. The feature may be selected against more urgently when its function becomes definitively harmful, but if the lack of the feature provides no advantage, and its presence provides no disadvantage, the feature may not be phased out by natural selection and persist across species.

<i>Homo heidelbergensis</i> Extinct species of archaic human

Homo heidelbergensis is an extinct species or subspecies of archaic human which existed during the Middle Pleistocene. It was subsumed as a subspecies of H. erectus in 1950 as H. e. heidelbergensis, but towards the end of the century, it was more widely classified as its own species. It is debated whether or not to constrain H. heidelbergensis to only Europe or to also include African and Asian specimens, and this is further confounded by the type specimen being a jawbone, because jawbones feature few diagnostic traits and are generally missing among Middle Pleistocene specimens. Thus, it is debated if some of these specimens could be split off into their own species or a subspecies of H. erectus. Because the classification is so disputed, the Middle Pleistocene is often called the "muddle in the middle".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microtia</span> Medical condition

Microtia is a congenital deformity where the auricle is underdeveloped. A completely undeveloped auricle is referred to as anotia. Because microtia and anotia have the same origin, it can be referred to as microtia-anotia. Microtia can be unilateral or bilateral. Microtia occurs in 1 out of about 8,000–10,000 births. In unilateral microtia, the right ear is most commonly affected. It may occur as a complication of taking Accutane (isotretinoin) during pregnancy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earlobe</span> Part of the ear

The human earlobe, the lower portion of the outer ear, is composed of tough areolar and adipose connective tissues, lacking the firmness and elasticity of the rest of the auricle. In some cases the lower lobe is connected to the side of the face. Since the earlobe does not contain cartilage it has a large blood supply and may help to warm the ears and maintain balance. However, earlobes are not generally considered to have any major biological function. The earlobe contains many nerve endings, and for some people is an erogenous zone.

A vestigial response or vestigial reflex in a species is a response that has lost its original function. In humans, vestigial responses include ear perking, goose bumps and the hypnic jerk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shovel-shaped incisors</span> Possible shape of human incisor teeth

Shovel-shaped incisors are incisors whose lingual surfaces are scooped as a consequence of lingual marginal ridges, crown curvature, or basal tubercles, either alone or in combination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human vestigiality</span> Human traits which lost their original function through evolution

In the context of human evolution, human vestigiality involves those traits occurring in humans that have lost all or most of their original function through evolution. Although structures called vestigial often appear functionless, a vestigial structure may retain lesser functions or develop minor new ones. In some cases, structures once identified as vestigial simply had an unrecognized function. Vestigial organs are sometimes called rudimentary organs. Many human characteristics are also vestigial in other primates and related animals.

Sex-limited genes are genes that are present in both sexes of sexually reproducing species but are expressed in only one sex and have no penetrance, or are simply 'turned off' in the other. In other words, sex-limited genes cause the two sexes to show different traits or phenotypes, despite having the same genotype. This term is restricted to autosomal traits, and should not be confused with sex-linked characteristics, which have to do with genetic differences on the sex chromosomes. Sex-limited genes are also distinguished from sex-influenced genes, where the same gene will show differential expression in each sex. Sex-influenced genes commonly show a dominant/recessive relationship, where the same gene will have a dominant effect in one sex and a recessive effect in the other. However, the resulting phenotypes caused by sex-limited genes are present in only one sex and can be seen prominently in various species that typically show high sexual dimorphism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Posterior auricular muscle</span> Muscle that pulls the ear upward and backward

The posterior auricular muscle is a muscle behind the auricle of the outer ear. It arises from the mastoid part of the temporal bone, and inserts into the lower part of the cranial surface of the auricle of the outer ear. It draws the auricle backwards, usually a very slight effect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual dimorphism in non-human primates</span> Sexual differences in primates

Sexual dimorphism describes the morphological, physiological, and behavioral differences between males and females of the same species. Most primates are sexually dimorphic for different biological characteristics, such as body size, canine tooth size, craniofacial structure, skeletal dimensions, pelage color and markings, and vocalization. However, such sex differences are primarily limited to the anthropoid primates; most of the strepsirrhine primates and tarsiers are monomorphic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in humans</span> Evolutionary effects of sexual selection on humans

Sexual selection in humans concerns the concept of sexual selection, introduced by Charles Darwin as an element of his theory of natural selection, as it affects humans. Sexual selection is a biological way one sex chooses a mate for the best reproductive success. Most compete with others of the same sex for the best mate to contribute their genome for future generations. This has shaped human evolution for many years, but reasons why humans choose their mates are not fully understood. Sexual selection is quite different in non-human animals than humans as they feel more of the evolutionary pressures to reproduce and can easily reject a mate. The role of sexual selection in human evolution has not been firmly established although neoteny has been cited as being caused by human sexual selection. It has been suggested that sexual selection played a part in the evolution of the anatomically modern human brain, i.e. the structures responsible for social intelligence underwent positive selection as a sexual ornamentation to be used in courtship rather than for survival itself, and that it has developed in ways outlined by Ronald Fisher in the Fisherian runaway model. Fisher also stated that the development of sexual selection was "more favourable" in humans.

<i>Homo erectus</i> Extinct species of archaic human

Homo erectus is an extinct species of archaic human from the Pleistocene, with its earliest occurrence about 2 million years ago. Its specimens are among the first recognizable members of the genus Homo.

In human anatomy, the levator claviculae is a very rare accessory and vestigial skeletal muscle in the posterior triangle of the neck. It originates on the transverse processes of the upper cervical vertebrae and is inserted in the lateral half of the clavicle. Though a supernumerary muscle present in only 2–3% of all people, it is not an abnormality but a variant of normal human anatomy with an atavistic character.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Odontometrics</span> Measurement and study of tooth size

Odontometrics is the measurement and study of tooth size. It is used in biological anthropology and bioarchaeology to study human phenotypic variation. The rationale for use is similar to that of the study of dentition, the structure and arrangement of teeth. There are a number of features that can be observed in human teeth through the use of odontometrics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neanderthal anatomy</span> Anatomical composition of the Neanderthal body

Neanderthal anatomy differed from modern humans in that they had a more robust build and distinctive morphological features, especially on the cranium, which gradually accumulated more derived aspects, particularly in certain isolated geographic regions. This robust build was an effective adaptation for Neanderthals, as they lived in the cold environments of Europe. In which they also had to operate in Europe's dense forest landscape that was extremely different from the environments of the African grassland plains that Homo sapiens adapted to with a different anatomical build.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis</span>

Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis (MLIA) is lack of development (agenesis) of one or both of the maxillary lateral incisor teeth. In normal human dentition, this would be the second tooth on either side from the center of the top row of teeth. The condition is bilateral if the incisor is absent on both sides or unilateral if only one is missing. It appears to have a genetic component.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kewal Krishan (forensic anthropologist)</span> Indian forensic anthropologist (born 1973)

Kewal Krishan, an Indian forensic anthropologist, is a professor of physical anthropology and former Chair of Department of Anthropology at Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. He has recently been appointed as Dean, International Students, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. He has contributed to the development of forensic anthropology in India. He is one of the very few forensic anthropology experts of the nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neoteny in humans</span> Retention of juvenile traits into adulthood

Neoteny is the retention of juvenile traits well into adulthood. In humans, this trend is greatly amplified, especially when compared to non-human primates. Neotenic features of the head include the globular skull; thinness of skull bones; the reduction of the brow ridge; the large brain; the flattened and broadened face; the hairless face; hair on the head; larger eyes; ear shape; small nose; small teeth; and the small maxilla and mandible.

References

  1. Millard, D. Ralph; Pickard, Robert E. (1970-04-01). "Darwin's Tubercle Belongs to Woolner". Archives of Otolaryngology. 91 (4): 334–335. doi:10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040492005. ISSN   0003-9977. PMID   4909009.
  2. Ruiz, A. (1986). "An anthropometric study of the ear in an adult population". International Journal of Anthropology. 1 (2): 135–43. doi:10.1007/BF02447350. S2CID   85200552.
  3. 1 2 3 Singh, P.; Purkait, R. (2009). "Observations of external ear—an Indian study". HOMO: Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 60 (5): 461–472. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2009.08.002. PMID   19748090.
  4. Hildén, K. (1929). "Studien über das Vorkommen der darwinschen Ohrspitze in der Bevölkerung Finnlands". Fennia (52): 3–39.
  5. 1 2 "Myths of Human Genetics: Darwin's tubercle". udel.edu. Retrieved 2015-11-02.
  6. 1 2 Gurbuz, H.; Karaman, F.; Mesut, R. (2005). "The variations of auricular tubercle in Turkish people. Institute of Experimental Morphology and Anthropology". Acta Morphol. Anthropol. 10: 150–156.
  7. 1 2 Rubio, O.; Galera, V.; Alonso, M.C. (August 2015). "Anthropological study of ear tubercles in a Spanish sample". HOMO: Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 66 (4): 343–356. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2015.02.005. PMID   25916201.
  8. Bean, R.B. (1915). "Some characteristics of the external ear of American Whites, American Indians, American Negroes, Alaskan Eskimos, and Filipinos". American Journal of Anatomy. 18 (1915): 201–225. doi:10.1002/aja.1000180204.
  9. Singh, L. (1977). "Hypertrichosis pinnae auris, Darwin's tubercle and palmaris longus among Khatris and Baniyas of Patiala, India". Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. (Rome). 26 (1977): 183–184. doi: 10.1017/S0001566000010011 . PMID   596117.
  10. Spinney, Laura (2008). "Vestigial organs: Remnants of evolution". New Scientist. 198 (2656): 42. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(08)61231-2.
  11. Quelprud, T. (1936). "Zur erblichkeit des darwinschen höckerchens". Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie. 34: 343–363.
  12. Beckman, L (1960). "An evaluation of some anthropological traits used in paternity tests". Hereditas (46): 543–569.
  13. Vollmer, H. (1937). "The shape of the ear in relation to body constitution". Arch. Pediatr. 54 (1937): 574–590.