Decisory oath

Last updated

A decisory oath or decisive oath [1] is a oath that can decide a fact at issue in a legal dispute. [2] A decisory oath that disclaims fault is also called an exculpatory oath.

Contents

Limited forms of decisory oath are found in some present-day civil law legal systems, where they are limited to civil litigation, and in some customary law systems. Historically decisory oaths enjoyed wide use, including in legal systems of Babylon and ancient Greece.

In civil law

Decisory oaths are specifically provided for in the civil codes of certain civil law systems, including France, [3] Italy, [4] [5] and Puerto Rico. [6] However, its modern use in these systems is largely tactical. [7] In these systems, when decisory oaths are allowed, they must be requested (or "referred") by the opposing party; having requested the oath, the requesting party is bound by it and is not permitted to present any proof that it is false.

If instead the second party requests that the first party demand the oath from it ("deferring" the oath), the first party does so, and the second party then refuses to swear, it is the second party that loses the case. [8]

According to John Henry Merryman, "The Decisory Oath worked in the following way: Party A could put Party B on his oath as to a fact at issue that was within Party B's knowledge. If Party B refused to swear, the fact was taken as conclusively proved against him. If Party B swore, the fact was taken as conclusively proved in his favor." [9] Mary Gregor explains that this procedure was "designed to protect the judge from threats from the wealthy and the powerful." [10]

Decisory oaths were abolished in Brazilian law in 1850 by the commercial litigation reform of Regulamento 737; prior to that, a creditor seeking to avoid prescription of a debt could defeat the presumption that the debt had been paid by demanding a decisory oath from the debtor. [11]

Decisory oaths play a significant role in many African systems of customary law, including those of Niger. [12] In the customary law of Nigeria, a person may swear a juju oath calling for themselves to be struck dead within the year if they are speaking falsely. [13]

Decisory oaths are also found in the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi [14] and are also mentioned in the Old Testament in chapter 22 of the Book of Exodus, which provides that someone who receives an animal for safekeeping that then dies can avoid any liability by swearing a decisory oath. [15] They are also found in Talmudic law. [16] Decisory oaths may also have served as a means of resolving criminal prosecutions in ancient Greek law. There is no historical record of a prosecution being ended in this way, but decisory oaths are mentioned in the Gortyn code. [17]

Notes

  1. Black's Law Dictionary (8th ed.). p. 1101. ISBN   0314151990.
  2. Merryman, John Henry; Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio (2007). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press. p. 119. ISBN   9780804755696.
  3. "SOUS-SECTION 1 Le serment décisoire". Code civil (in French). Retrieved 2024-10-30.
  4. "Effetti del giuramento decisorio" (in Italian). Studio Legale Sola. Retrieved 2024-10-30.
  5. "Giuramento". Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani (in Italian). Retrieved 2024-10-30.
  6. "§ 3298 - Weight of confession under decisory oath". 2023 Laws of Puerto Rico. Retrieved 2024-10-30.
  7. Merryman & Pérez-Perdomo 2007, p. 120.
  8. "décisoire / supplétoire". Juridictionnaire (in French). Government of Canada. Retrieved 2024-10-30.
  9. John Henry Merryman, The Civil Law Tradition (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969): 126, as cited in Immanuel Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996): 83n25 (emphasis added)
  10. Kant, loc. cit.
  11. Luiz Frederico Sauerbronn Carpenter (1919). Manual do Código civil brasileiro (in Portuguese). Vol. 4. J. Ribeiro dos Santos. p. 435.
  12. Kelley, Thomas A. III (2022). "Truth or Consequences (the Deadly Kind): Oath Swearing in Nigerien Customary Law" (pdf). North Carolina Journal of International Law. 47 (3): 331, 349.
  13. Kelley 2022, p. 351-352.
  14. Milhizer, Eugene R. (2009). "So help me Allah: An historical and prudential analysis of oaths as applied to the current controversy of the Bible and Quran in oath practices in America" (pdf). Ohio State Law Journal. 70: 1, 9 n.29.
  15. Milhizer 2009, p. 8 n.27.
  16. White, Thomas Raeburn (1903). "Oaths In Judicial Proceedings And Their Effect Upon The Competency of Witnesses" (pdf). American Law Register: 384 n.16.
  17. Leib, R.S. (2020). "I Nomi Degli Dei: A Reconsideration of Agamben's Oath Complex" (PDF). Law Critique. 31: 89 n.35. doi:10.1007/s10978-019-09253-8.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affidavit</span> Written legal statement, made under oath

An affidavit is a written statement voluntarily made by an affiant or deponent under an oath or affirmation which is administered by a person who is authorized to do so by law. Such a statement is witnessed as to the authenticity of the affiant's signature by a taker of oaths, such as a notary public or commissioner of oaths. An affidavit is a type of verified statement or showing, or in other words, it contains a verification, which means that it is made under oath on penalty of perjury, and this serves as evidence for its veracity and is required in court proceedings.

The adversarial system or adversary system or accusatorial system or accusatory system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth and pass judgment accordingly. It is in contrast to the inquisitorial system used in some civil law systems where a judge investigates the case.

A class action, also known as a class action lawsuit, class suit, or representative action, is a type of lawsuit where one of the parties is a group of people who are represented collectively by a member or members of that group. The class action originated in the United States and is still predominantly an American phenomenon, but Canada, as well as several European countries with civil law, have made changes in recent years to allow consumer organizations to bring claims on behalf of consumers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawyer</span> Practitioner of law

A lawyer is a person who is qualified to offer advice about the law, draft legal documents, or represent individuals in legal matters.

Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

Chinese law is one of the oldest legal traditions in the world. The core of modern Chinese law is based on Germanic-style civil law, socialist law, and traditional Chinese approaches. For most of the history of China, its legal system has been based on the Confucian philosophy of social control through moral education, as well as the Legalist emphasis on codified law and criminal sanction. Following the Xinhai Revolution, the Republic of China adopted a largely Western-style legal code in the civil law tradition. The establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 brought with it a more Soviet-influenced system of socialist law. However, earlier traditions from Chinese history have retained their influence.

A lawsuit is a proceeding by one or more parties against one or more parties in a civil court of law. The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today. The term "lawsuit" is used with respect to a civil action brought by a plaintiff who requests a legal remedy or equitable remedy from a court. The defendant is required to respond to the plaintiff's complaint or else risk default judgment. If the plaintiff is successful, judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, and the Court may impose the legal and/or equitable remedies available against the defendant (respondent). A variety of court orders may be issued in connection with or as part of the judgment to enforce a right, award damages or restitution, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to prevent an act or compel an act. A declaratory judgment may be issued to prevent future legal disputes.

A legal custom is the established pattern of behavior within a particular social setting. A claim can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted by law".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oath</span> Personal affirmation of a statement

Traditionally, an oath is a statement of fact or a promise taken by a sacrality as a sign of verity. A common legal substitute for those who object to making sacred oaths is to give an affirmation instead. Nowadays, even when there is no notion of sanctity involved, certain promises said out loud in ceremonial or juridical purpose are referred to as oaths. "To swear" is a verb used to describe the taking of an oath; to make a solemn vow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discovery (law)</span> Pretrial procedure in common law countries for obtaining evidence

Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a phase of pretrial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from other parties by means of methods of discovery such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and depositions. Discovery can be obtained from nonparties using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. Conversely, a party or nonparty resisting discovery can seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion for a protective order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil law (legal system)</span> Legal system originating in Western Europe

Civil law is a legal system originating in Italy and France that has been adopted in large parts of the world. Modern civil law stems mainly from the Napoleonic Code of the early 19th century, and it is a continuation of ancient Roman law. Its core principles are codified into a referable system, which serves as the primary source of law.

The legal origins theory claims that the two main legal traditions or origins, civil law and common law, crucially shape lawmaking and dispute adjudication and have not been reformed after the initial exogenous transplantation by Europeans. Therefore, they affect economic outcomes to date. According to the evidence reported by the initial proponents of such a theory, countries that received civil law would display today less secure investor rights, stricter regulation, and more inefficient governments and courts than those that inherited common law. These differences would reflect both a stronger historical emphasis of common law on private ordering and the higher adaptability of judge-made law.

The Law of the People's Republic of China, officially referred to as the "socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics," is the legal regime of China, with the separate legal traditions and systems of mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.

In law, a presumption is an "inference of a particular fact". There are two types of presumptions: rebuttable presumptions and irrebuttable presumptions. A rebuttable presumption will either shift the burden of production or the burden of proof ; in short, a fact finder can reject a rebuttable presumption based on other evidence. Conversely, a conclusive/irrebuttable presumption cannot be challenged by contradictory facts or evidence. Sometimes, a presumption must be triggered by a predicate fact—that is, the fact must be found before the presumption applies.

Compurgation, also called trial by oath, wager of law, and oath-helping, was a defence used primarily in medieval law. A defendant could establish his innocence or nonliability by taking an oath and by getting a required number of persons, typically twelve, to swear they believed the defendant's oath. The wager of law was essentially a character reference, initially by kin and later by neighbours, often 11 or 12 men, and it was a way to give credibility to the oath of a defendant at a time when a person's oath had more credibility than a written record. It can be compared to a legal wager, which is the provision of surety at the beginning of legal action to minimize frivolous litigation.

In common law jurisdictions and some civil law jurisdictions, legal professional privilege protects all communications between a professional legal adviser and his or her clients from being disclosed without the permission of the client. The privilege is that of the client and not that of the lawyer.

The legal system of South Korea is a civil law system that has its basis in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. The Court Organization Act, which was passed into law on 26 September 1949, officially created a three-tiered, independent judicial system. The revised Constitution of 1987 codified judicial independence in Article 103, which states that, "Judges rule independently according to their conscience and in conformity with the Constitution and the law." The 1987 rewrite also established the Constitutional Court, the first time that South Korea had an active body for constitutional review.

An examining magistrate is a judge in an inquisitorial system of law who carries out pre-trial investigations into allegations of crime and in some cases makes a recommendation for prosecution. Also known as an investigating magistrate, inquisitorial magistrate, or investigating judge, the exact role and standing of examining magistrates varies by jurisdiction. Common duties and powers of the examining magistrate include overseeing ongoing criminal investigations, issuing search warrants, authorizing wiretaps, making decisions on pretrial detention, interrogating the accused person, questioning witnesses, examining evidence, as well as compiling a dossier of evidence in preparation for trial.

Civil procedure in Brazil consists of the rules of civil procedure detailed in the Civil Procedure Code, which has been approved in March, 2015, and being in application since March, 2016, in substitution to the old code from 1973. As a civil law system, it is heavily influenced by Roman and German concepts of civil procedure. In Brazil, civil procedure regulates the hearings of conflicts based in various sectors of law, such as private law, social law, and public law.

The law of Mexico is based upon the Constitution of Mexico and follows the civil law tradition.