Decoy state

Last updated

Within quantum cryptography, the Decoy state quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is the most widely implemented QKD scheme. Practical QKD systems use multi-photon sources, in contrast to the standard BB84 protocol, making them susceptible to photon number splitting (PNS) attacks. This would significantly limit the secure transmission rate or the maximum channel length in practical QKD systems. In decoy state technique, this fundamental weakness of practical QKD systems is addressed by using multiple intensity levels at the transmitter's source, i.e. qubits are transmitted by Alice using randomly chosen intensity levels (one signal state and several decoy states), resulting in varying photon number statistics throughout the channel. At the end of the transmission Alice announces publicly which intensity level has been used for the transmission of each qubit. A successful PNS attack requires maintaining the bit error rate (BER) at the receiver's end, which can not be accomplished with multiple photon number statistics. By monitoring BERs associated with each intensity level, the two legitimate parties will be able to detect a PNS attack, with highly increased secure transmission rates or maximum channel lengths, making QKD systems suitable for practical applications.

Contents

Motivation

In the security proofs of QKD protocols, such as BB84, a single photon source is assumed to be used by the sender, Alice. In reality, a perfect single photon source does not exist. Instead, practical sources, such as weak coherent state laser source, are widely used for QKD. The key problem with these practical QKD sources lies on their multi-photon components. A serious security loophole exists when Alice uses multi-photon states as quantum information carriers. With multi-photon components, an eavesdropper, Eve, could in principle split the photons, keep one photon, and send the rest to Bob. After Alice and Bob announce the basis information, Eve can measure the intercepted photon to get the key information. When the channel is lossy, Eve can launch more sophisticated attacks, such as the photon number splitting attack. In order to minimize the effects of multi-photon states, Alice has to use an extremely weak laser source, which results in a relatively low speed of QKD. The decoy-state method is proposed to solve this multi-photon issue by using a few different photon intensities instead of one. With decoy states, the practical sources, such as a coherent-state source or heralded parametric down-conversion (PDC) source, perform almost as well as a single photon source. [1]

Development

The decoy-state scheme was proposed by Won-Young Hwang from Northwestern University. [2] Later, its security was proven by developing a photon number channel model and assuming the usage of an infinite number of decoy states. [3] A common practical decoy-state method only needs two decoy states, vacuum decoy and weak decoy. This vacuum+weak decoy state method was first proposed by Hoi-Kwong Lo from University of Toronto, [4] and then was analyzed by others. [5] [6] It has been shown that with only the vacuum and weak decoy states, the achieved key rate is very close to the infinite decoy state case. [6]

Experimental demonstrations

The first decoy state method experiment was performed by Hoi-Kwong Lo's group and their collaborator Li Qian, [7] where the one-decoy state method [6] is employed. The transmission distance is 15 km and the key generation speed is 165 bit/s. Then, a longer distance QKD is demonstrated with the vacuum+weak decoy state method via 60 km fiber. [8] Later, three experimental groups demonstrate the decoy-state method over 100 km distances. [9] [10] [11] There are many other demonstrations afterwards. [12] [13]

Decoy-state QKD using non-coherent-state sources

Decoy state QKD protocols with non-coherent-state sources have also been analyzed. Passive decoy state protocol, where the decoy states are prepared passively, is proposed as a parametric down-conversion source. [14] [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a secure communication method that implements a cryptographic protocol involving components of quantum mechanics. It enables two parties to produce a shared random secret key known only to them, which then can be used to encrypt and decrypt messages. The process of quantum key distribution is not to be confused with quantum cryptography, as it is the best-known example of a quantum-cryptographic task.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rydberg atom</span> Excited atomic quantum state with high principal quantum number (n)

A Rydberg atom is an excited atom with one or more electrons that have a very high principal quantum number, n. The higher the value of n, the farther the electron is from the nucleus, on average. Rydberg atoms have a number of peculiar properties including an exaggerated response to electric and magnetic fields, long decay periods and electron wavefunctions that approximate, under some conditions, classical orbits of electrons about the nuclei. The core electrons shield the outer electron from the electric field of the nucleus such that, from a distance, the electric potential looks identical to that experienced by the electron in a hydrogen atom.

Quantum networks form an important element of quantum computing and quantum communication systems. Quantum networks facilitate the transmission of information in the form of quantum bits, also called qubits, between physically separated quantum processors. A quantum processor is a small quantum computer being able to perform quantum logic gates on a certain number of qubits. Quantum networks work in a similar way to classical networks. The main difference is that quantum networking, like quantum computing, is better at solving certain problems, such as modeling quantum systems.

Oleg Sushkov is a professor at the University of New South Wales and a leader in the field of high temperature super-conductors. Educated in Russia in quantum mechanics and nuclear physics, he now teaches in Australia.

Jozef T. Devreese is a Belgian scientist, with a long career in condensed matter physics. He is Professor Emeritus of Theoretical Physics at the University of Antwerp.

In physics, the no-broadcasting theorem is a result of quantum information theory. In the case of pure quantum states, it is a corollary of the no-cloning theorem. The no-cloning theorem for pure states says that it is impossible to create two copies of an unknown state given a single copy of the state. Since quantum states cannot be copied in general, they cannot be broadcast. Here, the word "broadcast" is used in the sense of conveying the state to two or more recipients. For multiple recipients to each receive the state, there must be, in some sense, a way of duplicating the state. The no-broadcast theorem generalizes the no-cloning theorem for mixed states.

In quantum optics, a NOON state or N00N state is a quantum-mechanical many-body entangled state:

Quantum cloning is a process that takes an arbitrary, unknown quantum state and makes an exact copy without altering the original state in any way. Quantum cloning is forbidden by the laws of quantum mechanics as shown by the no cloning theorem, which states that there is no operation for cloning any arbitrary state perfectly. In Dirac notation, the process of quantum cloning is described by:

Atomtronics is an emerging type of computing consisting of matter-wave circuits which coherently guide propagating ultra-cold atoms. The systems typically include components analogous to those found in electronic or optical systems, such as beam splitters and transistors. Applications range from studies of fundamental physics to the development of practical devices.

The topological entanglement entropy or topological entropy, usually denoted by , is a number characterizing many-body states that possess topological order.

Quantum dimer models were introduced to model the physics of resonating valence bond (RVB) states in lattice spin systems. The only degrees of freedom retained from the motivating spin systems are the valence bonds, represented as dimers which live on the lattice bonds. In typical dimer models, the dimers do not overlap.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xiao-Gang Wen</span> Chinese-American physicist

Xiao-Gang Wen is a Chinese-American physicist. He is a Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Distinguished Visiting Research Chair at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. His expertise is in condensed matter theory in strongly correlated electronic systems. In Oct. 2016, he was awarded the Oliver E. Buckley Condensed Matter Prize.

Quantum cryptography is the science of exploiting quantum mechanical properties to perform cryptographic tasks. The best known example of quantum cryptography is quantum key distribution which offers an information-theoretically secure solution to the key exchange problem. The advantage of quantum cryptography lies in the fact that it allows the completion of various cryptographic tasks that are proven or conjectured to be impossible using only classical communication. For example, it is impossible to copy data encoded in a quantum state. If one attempts to read the encoded data, the quantum state will be changed due to wave function collapse. This could be used to detect eavesdropping in quantum key distribution (QKD).

Searches for Lorentz violation involving photons provide one possible test of relativity. Examples range from modern versions of the classic Michelson–Morley experiment that utilize highly stable electromagnetic resonant cavities to searches for tiny deviations from c in the speed of light emitted by distant astrophysical sources. Due to the extreme distances involved, astrophysical studies have achieved sensitivities on the order of parts in 1038.

Quantum illumination is a paradigm for target detection that employs quantum entanglement between a signal electromagnetic mode and an idler electromagnetic mode, as well as joint measurement of these modes. The signal mode is propagated toward a region of space, and it is either lost or reflected, depending on whether a target is absent or present, respectively. In principle, quantum illumination can be beneficial even if the original entanglement is completely destroyed by a lossy and noisy environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerhard Rempe</span> German physicist and professor

Gerhard Rempe is a German physicist, Director at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics and Honorary Professor at the Technical University of Munich. He has performed pioneering experiments in atomic and molecular physics, quantum optics and quantum information processing.

Jürgen Mlynek is a German physicist and was president of the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres from 2005 to 2015.

Bose–Einstein condensation of polaritons is a growing field in semiconductor optics research, which exhibits spontaneous coherence similar to a laser, but through a different mechanism. A continuous transition from polariton condensation to lasing can be made similar to that of the crossover from a Bose–Einstein condensate to a BCS state in the context of Fermi gases. Polariton condensation is sometimes called “lasing without inversion”.

Adrian Kent is a British theoretical physicist, Professor of Quantum Physics at the University of Cambridge, member of the Centre for Quantum Information and Foundations, and Distinguished Visiting Research Chair at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics. His research areas are the foundations of quantum theory, quantum information science and quantum cryptography. He is known as the inventor of relativistic quantum cryptography. In 1999 he published the first unconditionally secure protocols for bit commitment and coin tossing, which were also the first relativistic cryptographic protocols. He is a co-inventor of quantum tagging, or quantum position authentication, providing the first schemes for position-based quantum cryptography. In 2005 he published with Lucien Hardy and Jonathan Barrett the first security proof of quantum key distribution based on the no-signalling principle.

Bogdan Andrei Bernevig is a Romanian Quantum Condensed Matter Professor of Physics at Princeton University and the recipient of the John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship in 2017.

References

  1. Ma, Xiongfeng (2008). Quantum cryptography: from theory to practice (Ph.D.). University of Toronto. arXiv: 0808.1385 .
  2. Hwang, Won-Young (1 July 2003). "Quantum Key Distribution with High Loss: Toward Global Secure Communication". Physical Review Letters. 91 (5): 057901. arXiv: quant-ph/0211153 . Bibcode:2003PhRvL..91e7901H. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.057901. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   12906634. S2CID   19225674.
  3. Lo, Hoi-Kwong; Ma, Xiongfeng; Chen, Kai (16 June 2005). "Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 94 (23): 230504. arXiv: quant-ph/0411004 . Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94w0504L. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230504. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   16090452. S2CID   16938588.
  4. Lo, Hoi-Kwong (2004). Quantum key distribution with vacua or dim pulses as decoy states. Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. New York: IEEE Press. p. 137. doi:10.1109/ISIT.2004.1365174. ISBN   0-7803-8280-3.
  5. Wang, Xiang-Bin (16 June 2005). "Beating the Photon-Number-Splitting Attack in Practical Quantum Cryptography". Physical Review Letters. 94 (23): 230503. arXiv: quant-ph/0410075 . Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94w0503W. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.230503. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   16090451. S2CID   2651690.
  6. 1 2 3 Ma, Xiongfeng; Qi, Bing; Zhao, Yi; Lo, Hoi-Kwong (20 July 2005). "Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution". Physical Review A. American Physical Society (APS). 72 (1): 012326. arXiv: quant-ph/0503005 . Bibcode:2005PhRvA..72a2326M. doi:10.1103/physreva.72.012326. ISSN   1050-2947. S2CID   836096.
  7. Zhao, Yi; Qi, Bing; Ma, Xiongfeng; Lo, Hoi-Kwong; Qian, Li (22 February 2006). "Experimental Quantum Key Distribution with Decoy States". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 96 (7): 070502. arXiv: quant-ph/0503192 . Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96g0502Z. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.070502. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   16606067. S2CID   2564853.
  8. Zhao, Yi; Qi, Bing; Ma, Xiongfeng; Lo, Hoi-kwong; Qian, Li (2006). "Simulation and Implementation of Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution over 60km Telecom Fiber". 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. IEEE. pp. 2094–2098. arXiv: quant-ph/0601168 . doi:10.1109/isit.2006.261920. ISBN   1-4244-0505-X.
  9. Rosenberg, Danna; Harrington, Jim W.; Rice, Patrick R.; Hiskett, Philip A.; Peterson, Charles G.; Hughes, Richard J.; Lita, Adriana E.; Nam, Sae Woo; Nordholt, Jane E. (5 January 2007). "Long-Distance Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution in Optical Fiber". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 98 (1): 010503. arXiv: quant-ph/0607186 . Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98a0503R. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.010503. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   17358462. S2CID   1082713.
  10. Schmitt-Manderbach, Tobias; Weier, Henning; Fürst, Martin; Ursin, Rupert; Tiefenbacher, Felix; Scheidl, Thomas; Perdigues, Josep; Sodnik, Zoran; Kurtsiefer, Christian; Rarity, John G.; Zeilinger, Anton; Weinfurter, Harald (5 January 2007). "Experimental Demonstration of Free-Space Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution over 144 km". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 98 (1): 010504. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98a0504S. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.010504. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   17358463. S2CID   15102161.
  11. Peng, Cheng-Zhi; Zhang, Jun; Yang, Dong; Gao, Wei-Bo; Ma, Huai-Xin; Yin, Hao; Zeng, He-Ping; Yang, Tao; Wang, Xiang-Bin; Pan, Jian-Wei (5 January 2007). "Experimental Long-Distance Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution Based on Polarization Encoding". Physical Review Letters. 98 (1): 010505. arXiv: quant-ph/0607129 . Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98a0505P. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.010505. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   17358464. S2CID   45259447.
  12. Yuan, Z. L.; Sharpe, A. W.; Shields, A. J. (2007). "Unconditionally secure one-way quantum key distribution using decoy pulses". Applied Physics Letters. AIP Publishing. 90 (1): 011118. arXiv: quant-ph/0610015 . Bibcode:2007ApPhL..90a1118Y. doi:10.1063/1.2430685. ISSN   0003-6951. S2CID   20424612.
  13. Shams Mousavi, S. H.; Gallion, P. (24 July 2009). "Decoy-state quantum key distribution using homodyne detection". Physical Review A. American Physical Society (APS). 80 (1): 012327. arXiv: 1411.6155 . Bibcode:2009PhRvA..80a2327S. doi:10.1103/physreva.80.012327. ISSN   1050-2947. S2CID   119274803.
  14. Adachi, Yoritoshi; Yamamoto, Takashi; Koashi, Masato; Imoto, Nobuyuki (2 November 2007). "Simple and Efficient Quantum Key Distribution with Parametric Down-Conversion". Physical Review Letters. 99 (18): 180503. arXiv: quant-ph/0610118 . Bibcode:2007PhRvL..99r0503A. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.180503. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   17995389. S2CID   38698156.
  15. Ma, Xiongfeng; Lo, Hoi-Kwong (9 July 2008). "Quantum key distribution with triggering parametric down-conversion sources". New Journal of Physics. 10 (7): 073018. arXiv: 0803.2543 . Bibcode:2008NJPh...10g3018M. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073018 . ISSN   1367-2630.