Defence Production Sharing Agreement

Last updated

The Defence Production Sharing Agreement (DPSA) is a bilateral trade agreement between the United States and Canada that aims to balance the amount of military cross-border buying in order to avoid trade imbalances. Since its signing in 1956, it has led to a number of US companies sending military production to Canada in order to "offset" Canadian purchases of US military equipment. The Agreement has been amended on several occasions. The similar Defense Development Sharing Program organized sharing of military research and development.

Contents

Overview

The Canada-U.S. Defence Production Sharing Agreement (DPSA) was formalized in 1959 and codified specific measures to remove barriers to reciprocal procurement and integration of defense production, resulting in a “quid pro quo” arrangement. The U.S. waived the Buy American Act, putting Canadian industry on equal footing with U.S. firms when bidding on U.S. defense contracts. The U.S. also removed domestic price preference and import duties for Canadian defense goods produced for the Department of Defense and U.S. prime contractors. For the Canadians, the DPSA established “the US as producer of major defense systems and Canada as the producer of subsystems and components for the US market”, which inextricably linked U.S. and Canadian production capacity and supply chains of the joint industrial base. [1]

The Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC) is a Crown corporation that administers the DPSA on behalf of the Government of Canada. Under the DPSA, CCC acts as Prime Contractor on U.S. DoD contracts for purchases from Canada and supports Canadian export activity under the DPSA. The DPSA is CCC's core public policy mandate, which enables Canadian exporters to compete for contracts as part of the U.S. Department of Defense domestic supply base. In 2019–2020, CCC facilitated $928 million in sales to the US DoD under the DPSA. [2]

Objectives

The objectives of the Defense Production Sharing Agreement include:

(a) Achieving greater integration of both Canada’s and the United States’ military development and production capabilities while maintaining greater standardization of military equipment, wider dispersal of production facilities, and establishing a supply of supplemental sources. [3]

(b) Establishing Canada as a trusted acquisition partner, and ensuring that Canadian defense vendors are given equal and immediate consideration for U.S. Department of Defense (U.S. DoD) procurements—similar to American vendors—with certain exceptions. [4]

(c) Setting forth policies and procedures with respect to all contracts for supplies and services placed by the U.S. DoD with the Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC). [5]

Effect and Duration

The DPSA applies to all contracts placed, on or after October 1, 1956, by any U.S. military department with the Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC). It remains in force from year to year until terminated by mutual consent; however, it can be terminated by either party provided that six months' notice of termination has been given in writing. [5]

Costing

The DPSA includes provisions that place limits on the amount of profit that suppliers can gain from procurement contracts sourced under the Agreement; it also mandates that the CCC refund profits in excess of these amounts. The CCC is responsible for initiating audits to ensure costs and profits are in accordance with mutually agreed-upon practices, policies and procedures. The Agreement also states that the Canadian Government and its Departments and Agencies cannot profit from any contracts covered by the Agreement. Accordingly, contracts with the United States Department of Defense (U.S. DoD) are not subject to a CCC fee under the DPSA. The Agreement also excludes taxes and customs duties from being added to contracts awarded under the DPSA. [5]

Funding

As a part of the 2021 Federal Budget, the Government of Canada has reinstated an annual appropriation to CCC for the administration of the DPSA. [6]

Scope in Relation to Other Canada-U.S. Defence Trade Agreements

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)

While the DPSA removes barriers for Canadian companies selling to the U.S. DoD, the actual laws and regulations that govern purchases are detailed in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and more specifically the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS):

In addition, U.S. DoD Instruction 2035.01 recognizes Canadian companies as equal and valuable participants in the North American industrial base. [9]

Defence Development Sharing Agreement (DDSA)

Signed in 1963, eight years after the DPSA, the Defence Development Sharing Agreement (DDSA) allows Canadian companies to enter into U.S. DoD-led research and development projects, and is designed to provide Canada the same access to future U.S. DoD requirements for Research and Development projects as American companies. Canadian technologies created under the DDSA can be procured by the U.S. DoD under the DPSA. [10]

NASA Letter of Agreement

Following the establishment of the DPSA, in 1960 the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) signed a Letter of Agreement (LOA) with the CCC. The LOA institutes a similar level of support to NASA and sets forth policies and procedures with respect to the administration of contracts awarded to Canadian firms through the CCC. [11]

Economic Impact

Since the signing of the DPSA in 1956, the Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC) has acted as Prime Contractor for DPSA contracts totaling more than $30 Billion. [12]

In 2021–2022, the CCC facilitated contracts for 151 different Canadian companies and signed $868 Million in new export contracts with Canadian suppliers to deliver goods and services under the DPSA. [13]

From 2012 to 2021, the total value of DPSA contracts with different U.S. DoD military buying commands were: Department of the Air Force ($1.03 Billion), Naval Air Warfare Center ($651 Million), Tank-Automotive and Armaments Command ($521 Million), Development & Engineering Center ($502 Million), and the Naval Surface Warfare Center ($474 Million). [14] [ failed verification ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Dynamics</span> Defense manufacturing conglomerate

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American publicly traded aerospace and defense corporation headquartered in Reston, Virginia. As of 2020, it was the fifth-largest defense contractor in the world by arms sales, and fifth largest in the United States by total sales. The company is a Fortune 100 company, and was ranked No. 94 in 2022.

The Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace and defense manufacturer with worldwide interests. It was formed by the merger of Lockheed Corporation with Martin Marietta in March 1995. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C. area. As of January 2022, Lockheed Martin employs approximately 115,000 employees worldwide, including about 60,000 engineers and scientists.

International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) is a United States regulatory regime to restrict and control the export of defense and military technologies to safeguard national security and further its foreign policy objectives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defense Security Cooperation Agency</span> US military agency

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is an agency within the United States Department of Defense (DoD) which provides financial and technical assistance, transfer of defense materiel, training and services to allies, and promotes military-to-military contacts.

The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) is a wholly owned United States government corporation that was created in 1933 to "stabilize, support, and protect farm income and prices". The CCC is authorized to buy, sell, lend, make payments, and engage in other activities for the purpose of increasing production, stabilizing prices, assuring adequate supplies, and facilitating the efficient marketing of agricultural commodities.

In United States military contracts, the contract data requirements list is a list of authorized data requirements for a specific procurement that forms a part of the contract.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is the principal set of rules regarding Government procurement in the United States, and is codified at Chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 48 CFR 1. It covers many of the contracts issued by the US military and NASA, as well as US civilian federal agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defense industry of Japan</span> Overview of the defense industry of Japan

The Japanese defense industry is the part of the Japanese economy responsible for the procurement of military technology, primarily for the nation's own Self-Defense Forces, largely due to a strict policy on national exports.

In the United States, the processes of government procurement enable federal, state and local government bodies in the country to acquire goods, services, and interests in real property. Contracting with the federal government or with state and local public bodies enables interested businesses to become suppliers in these markets.

A Government Flight Representative (GFR) is a US Military Officer or similarly qualified US Government Civilian with the responsibility for aircraft operations conducted by commercial contractors using Department of Defense (DoD) aircraft.

Title 10 of the United States Code outlines the role of United States Armed Forces. It provides the legal basis for the roles, missions and organization of each of the services as well as the United States Department of Defense. Each of the five subtitles deals with a separate aspect or component of the armed services.

The arms industry of Russia, also known as the defense industry of Russia is a strategically important sector and a large employer in the Russian Federation. It employs approximately 3.5 million people nationwide and accounts for 20% of all manufacturing jobs in Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Commercial Corporation</span> Canadian crown corporation

The Canadian Commercial Corporation is a Canadian federal Crown corporation mandated to support the growth of international trade by helping Canadian exporters gain access to foreign government procurement markets and by helping government buyers abroad to obtain goods from Canada. The ability to enter into commercial contracts as a Government of Canada entity through CCC is designed to give Canadian exporters the opportunity to mitigate risks associated with foreign procurement and international contracting. Canadian businesses exported $2.92 billion in products and services through CCC contracts during the CCC’s 2020-2021 fiscal year.

Offsets are compensatory trade agreements, reciprocal trade agreements, between an exporting foreign company, or possibly a government acting as intermediary, and an importing entity. Offset agreements often involve trade in military goods and services and are alternatively called: industrial compensations, industrial cooperation, offsets, industrial and regional benefits, balances, juste retour or equilibrium, to define mechanisms more complex than counter-trade. Counter-trade can also be considered one of the many forms of defense offset, to compensate a purchasing country. The incentive for the exporter results from the conditioning of the core transaction to the acceptance of the offset obligation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military acquisition</span>

Military acquisition or defense acquisition is the "bureaucratic management and procurement process", dealing with a nation's investments in the technologies, programs, and product support necessary to achieve its national security strategy and support its armed forces. Its objective is to acquire products that satisfy specified needs and provide measurable improvement to mission capability at a fair and reasonable price.

Technical intelligence (TECHINT) is intelligence about weapons and equipment used by the armed forces of foreign nations. The related term, scientific and technical intelligence, addresses information collected or analyzed about the broad range of foreign science, technology, and weapon systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helicopter manufacturer</span>

Helicopter manufacturers belong to the broader category of aerospace manufacturers. It is useful to think of helicopter manufacturers as falling into two categories, those that can design, certify and manufacture new helicopter designs from scratch and those that can only manufacture extant designs under license. Boeing Vertol is an example of the first type and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, who license-produced Boeing Vertol designs for much of its recent history, is an example of the second type.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign Military Sales Act of 1968</span>

The Foreign Military Sales Act of 1968, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law  90–629, 82 Stat. 1320-2, enacted October 22, 1968, was supplemental legislation to the Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961 and the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. The Act discloses the United States commitment and sustainment to a world free from the dangers of armaments and the scourge of war.

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is an assessment framework and assessor certification program designed to increase the trust in measures of compliance to a variety of standards published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Navistar Defense LLC is a division of Navistar International that specializes in the manufacturing and design of military vehicles.

References

  1. Obecny, Kristinak; Sanders, Gregory; Ruedlinger, James; Ellman, Jesse (29 June 2017), U.S.-Canadian defense industrial cooperation (PDF), Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies / Rowman & Littlefield, ISBN   978-1-4422-8021-2
  2. "Government of Canada Committee of the Whole (House of Commons) 2021-22 Supplementary Estimates (B) December 7 and 8, 2021". December 7, 2021.
  3. Office of Technology Assessment (July 1991). "Appendix A: The North American defense industrial base: Canadian and Mexican contributions" (PDF). Redesigning defense: Planning the transition to the future U.S. defense industrial base (Report). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. OTA-ISC-500.
  4. Lasowski, Anne-Marie; Gatling, Marion; Slodkowski, Lillian; Cohen, Delores; Ferguson, Ian; Swierczek, Bob; Van Schaik, John (March 2022). Defense trade: Lessons to be learned from the country export exemption (PDF) (Report). United States General Accounting Office. GAO-02-63.
  5. 1 2 3 "Defence Production Sharing Agreement Between Canada and the United States of America" (PDF). Ottawa: Canadian Commercial Corporation. 2000 [1956].
  6. O'Brien, Alanna (2022-09-15). 2021-2022 First Quarter Financial Report (Unaudited) (PDF) (Report). Ottawa: Canadian Commercial Corporation.
  7. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
  8. Canadian Commercial Corporation (January 19, 2022). "What's a DFARS? & other secrets of selling to the U.S. DoD". Ottawa: Author. Archived from the original on 27 May 2022.
  9. Henry, Ryan (February 27, 2006). "Department of Defense Instruction 2035.01: Defense economic cooperation with Canada" (PDF). Washington, DC: United States Department of Defense.
  10. Drury, Charles M.; McNamara, Robert S. (21 November 1963). "Defence development sharing agreement between Canada and the United States of America". Ottawa: Government of Canada.
  11. "CCC and NASA: A relationship that's out of this world" (PDF). CanadExport. 20 (14). Ottawa: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade: 7. September 3, 2002. ISSN   0823-3330.
  12. Gagliardi, Alessandro (March 3, 2014). "Crown corporations as agents of the US foreign military sales program". NATO Association of Canada. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
  13. Canadian Commercial Corporation (2022-06-29). Promoting Canadian Export Resilience and Recovery: Annual Report 2021-2022 (PDF) (Report). Ottawa: Author.
  14. Canadian Commercial Corporation: U.S. DoD Prime Contractor