Democracy in Chains

Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America
	First edition
Author	Nancy MacLean
Language	English
Genre	Non-fiction
Publisher	Viking Press
Publication date	2017
Publication place	United States
Pages	368
ISBN	978-1101980989
OCLC	1033429279

Last updated December 04, 2024

Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America is a 2017 nonfiction book by Nancy MacLean published by Viking Press.^[1] MacLean critically examines the school of economic thinking known as "public choice", focusing on its founder James M. Buchanan, who received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1986. According to McLean, Buchanan's work has had a significant influence on the libertarian movement and in the US Republican Party, including the political activities of the Koch brothers.

MacLean argues that Buchanan believed democracy must be suppressed for capitalism to flourish, which explains why the right wing, funded behind the scenes by secretive dark money networks, engages in anti-democratic behavior and policy-making, such as opposing unions and Social Security, supporting voter suppression and privatization, and placing impenetrable barriers to popular and social democracy. The book was a finalist for the National Book Award for Nonfiction. Reviewers received it mostly along partisan political lines.^[2]

Background and development

The idea for the book came about while MacLean was researching school segregation in Prince Edward County, Virginia. She was studying the closure of public schools by segregationists from 1959 to 1964 in reaction to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education , which held that laws establishing racial segregation in public schools were unconstitutional.^[3]^[4]

MacLean learned that Prince Edward County refused to appropriate funds for the County School Board, effectively closing all public schools rather than integrate them, in a strategy known as massive resistance, an attempt to get Virginia's white politicians to pass laws and policies to prevent public school desegregation. "Black students were locked out of any formal education while their white peers went off to private, segregation academies with school vouchers, essentially punishing the black community in Prince Edward for having been part of the Brown v. Board of Education case," she recalled.^[4]

Her research, which spanned a period of about ten years,^[5] led her to American economist Milton Friedman and his defense of school vouchers, and to American economist James M. Buchanan. After Buchanan died in 2013, MacLean gained access to his papers at the Buchanan House at George Mason University. She discovered documents supporting the Kochs' investment in Buchanan's Center for Study of Public Choice, and this led her to develop her hypothesis about right-wing politics in the U.S. for the book.^[6]^[3]^[4]

Content summary

This book focuses on the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences-winning political economist James M. Buchanan and his work developing public choice theory, as well as the roles of Charles Koch and others, in nurturing the libertarian movement in the United States. MacLean argues that these figures undertook "a stealth bid to reverse-engineer all of America, at both the state and national levels back to the political economy and oligarchic governance of midcentury Virginia, minus the segregation."^[7] According to MacLean, Buchanan represents "the true origin story of today’s well-heeled radical right."^[8]

Reception

The book was praised by liberal and progressive scholars and readers. In The Atlantic , Sam Tanenhaus called Democracy in Chains "A vibrant intellectual history of the radical right", writing that the book "is part of a new wave of historiography that has been examining the southern roots of modern conservatism" and that it "untangle[s] important threads in American history [...] to make us see how much of that history begins, and still lives, in the South."^[9] George Monbiot, climate science author and columnist for The Guardian , wrote that the book was "the missing chapter: a key to understanding the politics of the past half century."^[10] Colin Gordon, writing in Jacobin , called the book "a revelation, as politics and as history."^[11] MacLean was interviewed by Rebecca Onion in Slate ,^[8] Alex Shephard in The New Republic , and Mark Karl in Alternet about her "remarkable"^[12] and "groundbreaking"^[13] book. Bethany Moreton of Dartmouth College called the book "indispensable reading [that] adds a critical storyline to the complex and multi-causal conservative counterrevolution."^[14] For BillMoyers.com, Kristin Miller wrote that MacLean "has unearthed a stealth ideologue of the American right" whom Charles Koch "looked to for inspiration".^[15] For NPR, Genevieve Valentie wrote the book "feels like it was written with a clock ticking down" after a "sixty-year campaign to make libertarianism mainstream and eventually take the government itself."^[16] Marshall Steinbaum of the Roosevelt Institute described himself as "in sympathy with MacLean’s characterization of the Virginia School as profoundly antidemocratic and anti-academic" and called the book "an important warning, and it should be read by all despite its rhetorical shortcomings."^[17] Luke Darby of GQ called Democracy in Chains "one of the nine books to read before the next election."^[18] MacLean was an invited guest on several popular television and radio outlets, most notably Real Time with Bill Maher , where she appeared twice (in August and November 2018) to discuss contemporary politics and the history of the far right.^[19]

Democracy in Chains was also criticized by libertarian scholars and readers in a special Volokh Conspiracy series that ran through June and July 2017. David Bernstein disputed her portrayal of Buchanan and George Mason University, where Bernstein is and Buchanan was a professor,^[20]^[21]^[22] and questioned the accuracy of her depiction of Buchanan's influence on the libertarian movement.^[23] Jonathan H. Adler noted allegations of serious errors and misleading quotations in Democracy in Chains raised by Russ Roberts, David R. Henderson, Don Boudreaux and others.^[24] Adler, Ilya Somin^[25] and Georg Vanberg^[26] were all part of the Volokh Conspiracy series. Michael Munger, a libertarian political scientist at Duke University wrote that Democracy in Chains "is a work of speculative historical fiction".^[27] Phil Magness argued that MacLean had "simply made up an inflammatory association" about Buchanan and the Southern Agrarians.^[28]^[29]^[30]^[31] Steve Horwitz argued that it was "a book that gets almost everything wrong, from the most basic of facts to the highest of theory".^[32] Brian Doherty argued, contra MacLean, that Buchanan had upbraided his colleagues who supported the Chilean dictatorship.^[33]^[34]^[35] In response, MacLean said she was the target of a "coordinated and interlinked set of calculated hit jobs" by "the Koch team of professors who don't disclose their conflicts of interest and the operatives who work full time for their project to shackle our democracy".^[36]^[37]^[38] She said her book's ranking on Amazon was being spammed by negative reviews and rankings and urged people to post positive ones in response (this is against Amazon policy).^[39] Adler, Bernstein, Carden, and Magness responded to her, saying that any Koch relationship was already acknowledged.^[40]^[20] Vanberg noted two later private letters in which Buchanan discussed his work on school vouchers and condemned the "evils of race-class-cultural segregation."^[41]

Others who fell into neither "team Public Choice" or "team anti-Buchanan" offered mixed reviews. Henry Farrell and Steven Teles called the book a "conspiracy theory in the guise of intellectual history"^[42]^[2] and wrote, "while we do not share Buchanan's ideology ... we think the broad thrust of the criticism is right. MacLean is not only wrong in detail but mistaken in the fundamentals of her account."^[42]^[2] Similarly, Noah Smith agreed that MacLean had taken Tyler Cowen, whom he called "a staunch defender of democracy", out of context.^[43] Heather Boushey wrote that MacLean had shone "a light on important truths" but cautioned that "her overt moral revulsion at her subject can sometimes make it seem as if we're getting only part of the picture".^[44] Jack Rakove wrote that there "should be a thorough scholarly review of these points [raised by critics], and one suspects that MacLean will have to make a more concerted effort to justify her argument than she has yet provided". He concluded that "her questions remain important and well worth pondering".^[45] Katherine Timpf of the National Review criticized MacLean for remarks she made during a February 7, 2018, talk in New York City. MacLean was asked to explain Buchanan's motivations. She replied, "As an author, I have struggled with this, and I could explain it in different ways. I didn’t put this in the book, but I will say it here. It’s striking to me how many of the architects of this cause seem to be on the autism spectrum —you know, people who don’t feel solidarity or empathy with others, and who have difficult human relationships sometimes."^[46] In 2022, George Leef, writing in the National Review, called it "a screed" and "a brazenly dishonest book".^[47]

In her review for the academic journal History of Political Economy , Jennifer Burns wrote that "the narrative of American history [that Democracy in Chains] presents is insular and highly politicized, laying out a drama of good versus evil with little attention paid to the larger worlds—global, economic, or intellectual—in which the story nests."^[48] In a review for the academic journal International Social Science Review , Ben Sorensen wrote, "the leftist bias and the assertions of conspiracy render the book questionably credible, at best".^[49]

Accolades

Democracy in Chains was a finalist for the 2017 National Book Award for nonfiction,^[50] a finalist for the "Los Angeles Times Book Award in Current Interest",^[51] and the winner of the Lannar Foundation Cultural Freedom Award.^[52] The book was also named "Most Valuable Book of 2017" by The Nation.^[53] In 2018, Democracy in Chains won the Lillian Smith Book Award, for "books that are outstanding creative achievements, worthy of recognition because of their literary merit, moral vision, and honest representation of the South, its people, problems, and promises."^[54]

Related Research Articles

James McGill Buchanan Jr. was an American economist known for his work on public choice theory originally outlined in his most famous work, The Calculus of Consent, co-authored with Gordon Tullock in 1962. He continued to develop the theory, eventually receiving the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1986. Buchanan's work initiated research on how politicians' and bureaucrats' self-interest, utility maximization, and other non-wealth-maximizing considerations affect their decision-making. He was a member of the Board of Advisors of The Independent Institute as well as of the Institute of Economic Affairs, a member of the Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) and MPS president from 1984 to 1986, a Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Cato Institute, and professor at George Mason University.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe is a German-American academic associated with Austrian School economics, anarcho-capitalism, right-wing libertarianism, and opposition to democracy. He is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), senior fellow of the Mises Institute think tank, and the founder and president of the Property and Freedom Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lew Rockwell</span> American libertarian author, editor, and political consultant (born 1944)

Llewellyn Harrison Rockwell Jr. is an American author, editor, and political consultant. A libertarian and a self-professed anarcho-capitalist, he founded and is the chairman of the Mises Institute, a non-profit promoting the Austrian School of economics.

Paleolibertarianism is a right-libertarian political activism strategy aimed at uniting libertarians and paleoconservatives. It was developed by American anarcho-capitalist theorists Murray Rothbard and Lew Rockwell in the American political context after the end of the Cold War. From 1989 to 1995, they sought to communicate libertarian notions of opposition to government intervention by using messages accessible to the working class and middle class people of the time. They combined libertarian free market views with the cultural conservatism of paleoconservatism, while also opposing protectionism. The strategy also embraced the paleoconservative reverence for tradition and religion. This approach, usually identified as right-wing populism, was intended to radicalize citizens against the state. The name they chose for this style of activism evoked the roots of modern libertarianism, hence the prefix paleo. That founding movement was American classical liberalism, which shared the anti-war and anti-New Deal sentiments of the Old Right in the first half of the 20th century. Paleolibertarianism is generally seen as a right-wing ideology.

Neo-Confederates are groups and individuals who portray the Confederate States of America and its actions during the American Civil War in a positive light. The League of the South, the Sons of Confederate Veterans and other neo-Confederate organizations continue to defend the secession of the former Confederate States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugene Volokh</span> Ukrainian–American legal scholar (born 1968)

Eugene Volokh is an American legal scholar known for his scholarship in American constitutional law and libertarianism as well as his prominent legal blog, The Volokh Conspiracy. Volokh is regarded as an expert on the First Amendment, and the Second Amendment. He is the Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles, and is an affiliate at the law firm Schaerr Jaffe.

Constitution in Exile is a controversial term that refers to the situation resulting from provisions of the United States Constitution allegedly not having been enforced according to their "original intent" or "original meaning". Some originalists might argue, for example, that the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause do not authorize economic legislation dating back to the New Deal.

The Volokh Conspiracy is a legal blog co-founded in 2002 by law professor Eugene Volokh, covering legal and political issues from an ideological orientation it describes as "generally libertarian, conservative, centrist, or some mixture of these." It is one of the most widely read and cited legal blogs in the United States. The blog is written by legal scholars and provides discussion on complex court decisions.

David E. Bernstein is an American legal scholar at the George Mason University School of Law in Arlington, Virginia, where he has taught since 1995. His primary areas of scholarly research are constitutional history and the admissibility of expert testimony. Bernstein is a contributor to the legal blog The Volokh Conspiracy. Bernstein is a graduate of the Yale Law School, where he was a John M. Olin Fellow in Law, Economics and Public Policy, a Claude Lambe Fellow of the Institute for Humane Studies, and a senior editor of the Yale Law Journal. He received his undergraduate degree from Brandeis University.

In the United States, libertarianism is a political philosophy promoting individual liberty. According to common meanings of conservatism and liberalism in the United States, libertarianism has been described as conservative on economic issues and liberal on personal freedom, often associated with a foreign policy of non-interventionism. Broadly, there are four principal traditions within libertarianism, namely the libertarianism that developed in the mid-20th century out of the revival tradition of classical liberalism in the United States after liberalism associated with the New Deal; the libertarianism developed in the 1950s by anarcho-capitalist author Murray Rothbard, who based it on the anti-New Deal Old Right and 19th-century libertarianism and American individualist anarchists such as Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner while rejecting the labor theory of value in favor of Austrian School economics and the subjective theory of value; the libertarianism developed in the 1970s by Robert Nozick and founded in American and European classical liberal traditions; and the libertarianism associated with the Libertarian Party, which was founded in 1971, including politicians such as David Nolan and Ron Paul.

<i>Spiked</i> (magazine) British Internet-based magazine

Spiked is a British Internet magazine focusing on politics, culture and society. The magazine was founded in 2001 with the same editor and many of the same contributors as Living Marxism, which had closed in 2000 after losing a case for libel brought by ITN.

Louise Wensel, was a Doctor of Medicine and political candidate and activist.

In American politics, fusionism is the philosophical and political combination or "fusion" of traditionalist and social conservatism with political and economic right-libertarianism. Fusionism combines "free markets, social conservatism, and a hawkish foreign policy". The philosophy is most closely associated with Frank Meyer.

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a nonprofit foundation headquartered in Carmel, Indiana, which promotes the libertarian views of its founder, Pierre F. Goodrich through publishing, conferences, and educational resources. The operating mandate of the Liberty Fund was set forth in an unpublished memo written by Goodrich "to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals".

Charles G. and David H. Koch (1940–2019), sometimes referred to as the Koch brothers, have become famous for their financial and political influence in United States politics with a libertarian, more specifically, right-libertarian or American-style libertarian political stance. From around 2004 to 2019, with "foresight and perseverance", the brothers organized like-minded wealthy libertarian-oriented conservatives, spent hundreds of millions of dollars of their own money to build an "integrated" and "stealth" network of think tanks, foundations, "grassroots" movements, academic programs, advocacy and legal groups to "destroy the prevalent statist paradigm" and reshape public opinion to favor minimal government. As of mid 2018, the media has been encouraged to refer to the "Koch network" rather than the "Koch brothers".

Charles de Ganahl Koch is an American billionaire businessman. As of February 2024, he was ranked as the 23rd richest man in the world on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, with an estimated net worth of $64.9 billion. Koch has been co-owner, chairman, and chief executive officer of Koch Industries since 1967, while his late brother David Koch served as executive vice president. Charles and David each owned 42% of the conglomerate. The brothers inherited the business from their father, Fred C. Koch, then expanded the business. Koch Industries is the largest privately held company by revenue in the United States, according to Forbes.

Ilya Somin is an American legal scholar. He is a law professor at George Mason University, B. Kenneth Simon Chair in Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute, a blogger for the Volokh Conspiracy, and a former co-editor of the Supreme Court Economic Review (2006–2013). His research focuses on constitutional law, property law, migration rights, and the study of popular political participation and its implications for constitutional democracy.

Curtis Guy Yarvin, also known by the pen name Mencius Moldbug, is an American blogger. He is known, along with philosopher Nick Land, for founding the anti-egalitarian and anti-democratic philosophical movement known as the Dark Enlightenment or neo-reactionary movement (NRx).

Dawn Hayley Foster was an Irish-British journalist, broadcaster, and author writing predominantly on social affairs, politics, economics and women's rights. Foster held staff writer positions at Inside Housing, The Guardian, and Jacobin magazine, and contributed to other journals such as The Independent, The New York Times, Tribune, and Dissent. She regularly appeared as a political commentator on television and was known for her coverage of the Grenfell Tower fire.

Nancy K. MacLean is an American historian. She is the William H. Chafe Professor of History and Public Policy at Duke University. MacLean's research focuses on race, gender, labor history and social movements in 20th-century U.S. history, with particular attention to the U.S. South.

References

↑ MacLean, Nancy (2018) [2017]. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. New York: Penguin Books. p. 368. ISBN 978-1101980972. OCLC 1029879485.
1 2 3 Farrell, Henry; Teles, Steven (30 August 2017). "When Politics Drives Scholarship". Boston Review.
1 2 The Inspiration Behind 'Democracy in Chains'. Duke University. July 3, 2017. Retrieved December 14, 2021.
1 2 3 Democracy in Chains: An interview with author Nancy MacLean. SPLC. March 8, 2018. Retrieved December 14, 2021.
↑ "I have spent the better part of the past decade researching and unraveling the historical roots of the ideas that the radical libertarian right funded by Charles Koch and his network of dark money donors are applying to transform our country." See: After Janus v. AFSCME: Why Teachers and Workers are Fighting Back Against the Secret Money Campaign to Take Away Their Rights. Testimony of Dr. Nancy MacLean, William H. Chafe Professor of History and Public Policy, Duke University. Democratic Policy and Communications Committee (DPCC). Video.
↑ MacLean (2018), xxi–xxiii
↑ MacLean, Nancy (2017). Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. Penguin. ISBN 978-1101980989.^{[ page needed ]}
1 2 Onion, Rebecca (June 22, 2017). "What Is the Far Right's Endgame? A Society That Suppresses the Majority". Slate . ISSN 1091-2339 . Retrieved July 10, 2017.
↑ Tanenhaus, Sam. "The Architect of the Radical Right". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-07-06.
↑ Monbiot, George (July 19, 2017). "A despot in disguise: one man's mission to rip up democracy". The Guardian.
↑ Gordon, Colin (June 2017). "Democracy's Critics". Jacobin .
↑ Shephard, Alex (June 27, 2017). "The Right's War Against Liberal Democracy". The New Republic .
↑ Karlin, Mark (July 10, 2017). "This Libertarian Strategy to Make America as Screwed-Up as Texas". AlterNet .
↑ Moreton, Bethany (2017-08-10). "Kochonomics: The Racist Roots of Public Choice Theory". Boston Review. Retrieved 2018-04-04.
↑ "The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America". BillMoyers.com. Retrieved 2018-04-04.
↑ "'Democracy In Chains' Traces The Rise Of American Libertarianism". NPR.org. Retrieved 2018-04-04.
↑ Steinbaum, Marshall (14 August 2017). "The Book that Explains Charlottesville". Boston Review.
↑ Darby, Luke (2018-11-08). "9 Books to Read Before the Next Election". GQ. Retrieved 2018-11-17.
↑ "Duke professor Nancy MacLean appears on HBO's Real Time, discusses Koch brothers". The Chronicle. Retrieved 2018-11-17.
1 2 Bernstein, David (July 20, 2017). "Opinion: Did Nancy MacLean make stuff up in 'Democracy in Chains'?". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy. ISSN 0190-8286 . Retrieved April 2, 2022.
↑ Bernstein, David. "Opinion: Yet more dubious claims in Nancy MacLean's 'Democracy in Chains'". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy.
↑ Bernstein, David. "Opinion | Some dubious claims in Nancy MacLean's 'Democracy in Chains,' continued". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy.
↑ Bernstein, David (July 17, 2017). "Opinion:How influential was James Buchanan among libertarians?". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy.
↑ Adler, Jonathan. "Opinion: Does 'Democracy in Chains' paint an accurate picture of James Buchanan?". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy.
↑ Somin, Ilya (July 10, 2017). "Opinion: Who wants to put democracy in chains?". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy.
↑ Vanberg, Georg. "Opinion: Duke professor Georg Vanberg on 'Democracy in Chains'". Washington Post. The Volokh Conspiracy.
↑ Michael Munger. "On the Origins and Goals of Public Choice". The Independent Institute.
↑ Carden, Art; Geloso, Vincent; Magness, Phillip W. (July 25, 2017). "Situating Southern Influences in James M. Buchanan and Modern Public Choice Economics". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 3008867.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
↑ Magness, Phillip. "How Nancy MacLean Went Whistlin' Dixie". historynewsnetwork.org.
↑ "On Buchanan's Intellectual History and MacLean's Missing Leviathan". historynewsnetwork.org.
↑ Carden, Art; Magness, Phil (July 17, 2017). "Buchanan the Evil Genius". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 3004029.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
↑ Horwitz, Steven (July 24, 2017). "Confirmation Bias Unchained: Nancy Maclean on James Buchanan, the History of Public Choice Theory, and Libertarianism". Social Science Research Network. SSRN 3007751.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
↑ "What Nancy MacLean Gets Wrong About James Buchanan". Reason.com. July 21, 2017.
↑ "To Duke Historian Nancy MacLean, Advocating Free Markets Is Something 'The World Has Never Seen Anything Like...Before'". Reason.com. August 2, 2017.
↑ Farrant, Andrew; Tarko, Vlad (16 January 2018). "James M. Buchanan's 1981 visit to Chile: Knightian democrat or defender of the 'Devil's fix'?". The Review of Austrian Economics. 32: 1–20. doi:10.1007/s11138-017-0410-3. ISSN 0889-3047. S2CID 159003961.
↑ Parry, Marc (2017). "Nancy MacLean Responds to Her Critics". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
↑ Parry, Marc (July 19, 2017). "A New History of the Right Has Become an Intellectual Flashpoint". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
↑ Flaherty, Coleen (July 12, 2017). "Stealth Attack on Liberal Scholar?". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
↑ Zakaria, Rafia (9 October 2017). "How Amazon reviews became the new battlefield of US Politics". The Guardian.
↑ Adler, Jonathan H. (July 20, 2017). "Opinion | Nancy MacLean responds to her critics". Washington Post .
↑ "Opinion: Georg Vanberg: Democracy in Chains and James M. Buchanan on school integration". Washington Post.
1 2 Farrell, Henry; Teles, Steven (14 July 2017). "Even the intellectual left is drawn to conspiracy theories about the right. Resist them". Vox .
↑ "Be Clear-Eyed About Democracy's Weaknesses". Bloomberg.com. July 21, 2017.
↑ Boushey, Heather (15 August 2017). "How the Radical Right Played the Long Game and Won". The New York Times.
↑ Rakove, Jack. "Critical Inquiry". criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu.
↑ Timpf, Katherine (February 14, 2018). "Duke Professor: Libertarians 'Seem to Be on the Autism Spectrum'". National Review. Retrieved April 8, 2022.
↑ Leef, George (2022-06-20). "Welcome to the Brave New World of Leftist Scholarship". National Review.
↑ Burns, Jennifer (2018). "Book Review: Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean". History of Political Economy. 50 (3): 640–648. doi:10.1215/00182702-7023786. S2CID 149650365.
↑ Sorensen, Ben (2019-09-03). "Book Review: Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America by Nancy MacLean". International Social Science Review. 95 (2). ISSN 0278-2308.
↑ "2017 National Book Award finalists revealed". CBS News. October 4, 2017. Retrieved 2017-10-04.
↑ Schaub, Michael (21 February 2018). "L.A. Times Book Prize finalists include Joyce Carol Oates and Ta-Nehisi Coates; John Rechy receives lifetime achievement award". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved 2018-04-04.
↑ "Lannan Foundation". Lannan Foundation. Retrieved 2018-04-04.
↑ Nichols, John (2017-12-20). "The 2017 Progressive Honor Roll". The Nation. ISSN 0027-8378. Archived from the original on 2018-04-05. Retrieved 2018-04-04.
↑ "Lillian Smith Book Awards". www.libs.uga.edu. Hargrett Library : University of Georgia Libraries. Archived from the original on 2018-05-21. Retrieved 2018-05-20.